Archive for the ‘Tea Party’ Category

The military, called up after TikTok, the "tea war" comes out global – Your Mining News

(CNN) You will remember the tea party in Boston from 1773, when American revolutionaries famously walked the British, throwing boxes of tea in the port of Boston.

New spitting in the right way to make a cup has become a similar international incident, with the ambassadors of the United Kingdom and the United States sticking their spoons.

It all started in early May when an American TikTok user named Michelle from North Carolina stirred up a fierce twist on social media platforms with his controversial guide to making hot tea.

It included a microwave and a dishonest mix of milk, lemonade powder, cinnamon, Tang soft drink, industrial quantities of sugar, and an innocent tea that certainly deserved better things in life.

This was too much for British consumers, who are proud of their national drink with homes, with leaves imported mainly from Kenya, India and Malawi. The twins topics in the furious outpouring of comments were war crime and diabetes.

The fifth TikTok columnist has already garnered over five million likes for her efforts, but she has also sparked righteous anger in a nation close to the boiling point and with a lot of time in her hands.

Thats what Damn Karen Pierce, the British ambassador to the United States in Washington, called for in the military.

Yes, thats right, in a video released Monday, she got the boys from the British Army, Navy and Air Force to demonstrate how to make tea in a patriotic and popcorn way. There was even a nod to how to hold high tea at high altitude.

Pierce had gathered his forces behind him, but when Woody Johnson, the US ambassador to the United Kingdom, joined on Wednesday, he acted like Dirty Harry and went solo.

His strategy was smart. It continued after Britains weakness: coffee. When the UK is weak on continental-style caffeine consumption, how can it go wrong?

The problem with this Clint Eastwood cappuccino is that it makes what looks like an absolutely awful cup of coffee.

He commits the main sin in the use of instant coffee, raising hacks to any connoisseur faster than hot water dissolves dried granulated granules.

As people around the world have increased their gourmet emissions during the blockade, with their starter pots and AeroPress cold boils, there can only be one message for Johnson. Do better.

There are still no video responses from Rafaele Trombeta, Italys ambassador to the UK since 2018, and Armando Varicchio, Italys ambassador to the United States for the past four years.

Nor were there any comments on TikTok tea from Liu Xiaoming, Chinas ambassador to Britain, or Josefat Karanja and Gaytri I. Kumar, the high commissioners of Kenya and India in Britain, respectively.

Is the time for silence over?

Read the original post:
The military, called up after TikTok, the "tea war" comes out global - Your Mining News

Education the only cure – The News International

COVERSTORY

Zohra Shah, a young girl who was just eight years old, should have been playing in her garden, having a tea party for her dolls and running around with her friends and family. Unfortunately, however, she was employed as a slave-like domestic worker. Instead of having access to education, she was kept indoors, burdened with household chores, too heavy for her frail shoulders. She was brutally tortured - and killed - by her employers after she accidentally opened a birdcage, freeing the birds. Zohra was brought to the hospital after being beaten to an inch of her life, but succumbed to her injuries.

Her employers later admitted to hitting Zohra for releasing their parrots. To these cruel people, their parrots were more valuable than a human life. Zohra had no intention of harming anyone and causing an issue; yet, her life, education and childhood were ruthlessly snatched from her.

Instead of working, she should have been in school, getting an education and building a future for herself, but that was not to be: she is now gone and can never come back. This couple misused their power by abusing Zohra in a way which shocked our nation to its core. No one deserves to die in such a horrible way, especially a child who made an honest mistake! The people who work for you are there to make your life easier and to help you out. They are human beings and have rights. They deserve to be treated with kindness, consideration and respect!

A huge number of children is employed as domestic workers. Children of all ages, from as young as six to seven years of age to older teens, are hired as domestic servants. They are deprived of their right to education, and exposed to horrors like physical and mental abuse. The state has failed in its duty to protect them.

Child labour deprives children of their childhood, their future potential and dignity! Statistics show that in Pakistan, children between the age of ten to 14 are forced to work; of these, 61 percent are boys and 88 percent come from rural areas. Child labour is not acceptable under any circumstances. Child abuse is even worse, and killing an innocent human is completely and utterly unacceptable. This is not how we want our country to be perceived. We need change; we need justice and, most importantly, we need to stand together as a nation and educate ourselves in order to take action. As humans who care about our future, we should not remain silent and this cruelty should not be ignored.

It is sad that people feel like they are superior to others based on economic status, and that is completely immoral. The small population of Pakistani citizens with power, money and influence should be educating other children, feeding the homeless and donating to a good cause instead of murdering, torturing and performing other horrific acts upon those under their power. We all are human beings and economic status doesnt define us. Our society is becoming so egotistical that people feel like the only way to take action is with violence.

If you want to help us bring a change, this is the time to start now. Donating a small amount of money, community service and volunteering can really help. Our NGO, Educating our Future, works to bring awareness about the importance of education, because we believe that change can only be brought through education. Education alone can empower our citizens, and bring about the change we all want to see.

********************

Us talked to Alesha Faraz to learn more about the NGO, Educating our Future

Tell us about yourself and your organisation. What are your key achievements? How do you manage it, especially during this pandemic?

We started this organisation with the hope to educate underprivileged children all over Karachi. We are passionate about education, and feel it is a great privilege to be able to get a good education. So, we decided that every child deserves to be educated. Since starting this organisation in February, we have come quite a long way. Together we planned a fundraiser on the 16th of February. Many people showed up to support us and all in all it was a very successful event. Through this fundraiser, we managed to raise eight lakh rupees.

This money was used to buy necessities and school supplies for a conjoining orphanage and school. We supplied the orphanage with basic furniture, books, prayer mats, copies of Quran, cleaning supplies, mattresses, blankets and hygiene supplies.

For the school, we bought all the tools they needed to teach their children with ease such as notebooks, pencils, paper, books, etc. We also went to the school and gave a talk on the importance of hygiene. As we cant go to school, we have started doing a lot more online. We are in touch with the lady who is in charge there and we have made more goals for ourselves to raise money and awareness for them. We have submitted articles to many different places and have come up with different posts for our Instagram account about ongoing issues, so we can educate our audience. Using this quarantine time wisely, we have decided to write a book on education and its importance. These are our key accomplishments and we have planned to do a lot more in the upcoming future.

How do you people plan to support children? Tell us about your action plan.

Supporting a large number of children is not an easy task, but it is our goal to do so. We want to make education fun for the kids. We plan on hosting a lot more events in the future and use that money to improve the quality of education and supply the school with whatever they need to do that. Before the pandemic, we went to the school every weekend. We taught the children and played with them. We can organise activities for them and educate them on the real issues in the world. Along with that we will also help the teachers out with work. We are also planning to have more drives for collecting books, clothes and other necessities for the children. If the children ever need to talk or need advice with anything, we are always there for them to help out. As we want to Educate Our Future we will do anything and everything in our power to help these kids and make their lives easier along with providing them with education.

People usually think teenagers are carefree and apathetic when it comes to bad things happening in society! But, of course, this is not true! They also get affected. How do you guys feel? What encouraged you to step forward and start an NGO to serve this great cause?

We feel privileged because we study in one of the best schools in the country, and we want to give back. Just the thought of the kids on the streets being deprived of basic schooling makes us feel bad. This motivates us to work and help them get an education. Rich or poor, everyone should be given the opportunity to make something of themselves. We want to see a change in our country, and we want to help bring it. We want to see children becoming successful! In short, we want to make the world a better place. Together we can accomplish goals, but it wont happen without education.

Spreading awareness is a very important thing to do, so what are you doing about this issue?

We have done different things to spread awareness. For example, we have made an Instagram account where we post and update our followers about our NGO and issues related to children, like the tragic death of Zohra Shah. We also submit our articles to magazines and newspapers. Weve also been interviewed by Geo News about our fundraiser and about our NGO which encouraged more people to donate after it got published. We are trying our best to spread awareness in different ways so that we can reach out to people all over our country and everyone can see how the need to rise up and support others.

Who supports the NGO?

We are students of Karachi American School. We started our NGO because we believe education can greatly impact Pakistans progress, and we really want to try to improve the system. We are the future of Pakistan and we are very proud to call ourselves Pakistanis! We will fight to bring a change in our country. We hold fundraisers and events to support our NGO.

A word about your parents role?

Our parents have helped us through out, and without them it would have been very hard to manage everything. If we dont understand something, they guide us. We couldnt have renovated the orphanage without them. They played a major role in our NGO and we are extremely lucky to have parents like ours who encourage us to be better and stronger people. They are involved with other charities and orphanages and so they are in a better position to guide us. We appreciate them, and their help enormously.

Right now, social media is one of the biggest platforms where NGOs work gets recognition and we have seen that people do support good causes! In your case, how is the response? And tell us about the activities (donation drives, live interviews, etc.) you do on your social media to engage people. And what challenges do you face?

Some activities we have organised are book and clothes drives, an interview, etc. For our book and clothes drives, we put up posts on our Instagram, placed collection boxes in school and at our fundraiser. People sent books and clothes to our houses. We had shirts made which had Educate printed on them, and we sold over fifty shirts. All the money went to the orphanage and school that our NGO supports. On our social media, we started posting pictures of the orphanage and school. We cant go to the school anymore due to Covid 19, so that is a challenge.

Then, we started researching more about the lack of education and other issues being faced by our nation. We were shocked to learn that about 55 million children in Pakistan are unable to read or write. After researching, we started posting facts, so people could read them and realise whats going on. Another big challenge we really faced was we didnt have a big following, so our posts were not getting shared. We have started small, but we are determined to grow.

You can contact

[emailprotected] or go to their Instagram page @Educatingourfuture_ to donate and ask questions.

Read the original post:
Education the only cure - The News International

The Tea Party and the New Untamed – National Review

A woman wearing a face mask holds a placard as hundreds of supporters of the Michigan Conservative Coalition protest against the states extended stay-at-home order at the Capitol building in Lansing, Mich., April 15, 2020. (Seth Herald/Reuters)

My colleague Rich Lowry pens an excellent column that draws comparisons between those publicly protesting the excesses of the pandemic lockdowns and the Tea Party movement that erupted in 2009 in response to Big Governments push to get much bigger, and quickly.

The column serves as a timely opportunity to draw attention to a new study conducted by Anne Sorock Segal and Jack Sorock of the Frontier Center (I am a board member) on what they are calling the Reopen Movement. Their research seeks to understand and convey the motivations of citizens who are the strongest advocates including those engaged in defiant public protesting for reopening states under government-imposed stay at home orders. Segal and Sorock say that critics of the Reopen protestors are getting it wrong. Very much so.

The studys methods include polling (of 974 respondents) and, from a smaller contingent, behavioral event modeling a drill-down method that unveils the deep values that motivate either public action or vocal support for the protestors. In essence, the undertaking answers the fundamental question: Just who are these Reopeners? And the obvious comparison: Are they Tea Party 2.0? There are great similarities but also some major differences. Indeed, among the Reopeners, there is even a goodly amount of indifference to Tea Party 1.0.

Here are the four key finding the study (the abstract is here) has discovered:

This movement is not so much political as it is personal and self-definitional (a gut check on values that activate one to enter the public foray), selfless (this is not about getting my favorite bar back in the business of pouring pints), and also communal, all of it prompted by and occurring within a historical crisis for America. From the findings:

Reopeners said that, while this moment of crisis challenges their sense of who they are, their actions of defiance allow them to take pride in who they are. The tone of their defiance is bold, with two outcomes: First, their boldness works it causes authorities to back down. Second, their boldness matches the moment the scale and disposition of government action has been monumental, and Reopeners believe they are showing they understand the importance of this challenge to freedom. Reopeners say achieving a political victory in the short-term, though important, is secondary. The primary objective is to answer the question who am I? during what feels like a watershed moment. Reopeners are concerned they might not live up to the precedents of others who rose to meet similar moments in American and world history. For those who took action, they experienced boldness and courage, and learned they might be able to contribute or sacrifice going forward in ways that had never before been tested.

The study, which surveyed nearly 1,000 subjects, provides worthwhile numerical findings on make-up, where Reopeners stand politically, and on Trump, their views of the Tea Party, and more. Among the results:

Given the last point, it should not come as a surprise that the cancellation of church services on Easter played a big role in engendering this movement:

When Easter Sunday fell in the middle of the coronavirus shutdowns, many of the Reopener churchgoers took one of three paths: (1) they sought out a new church, often further away; (2) they held their own spiritual gathering in someones home, or; (3) they had time available to catch up on the news.

The research sought to get to the root of what made an individual actually take to the streets to protist. Numerous emotional factors and states of mind bear on this, but the study found that three events or circumstances in particular proved key to motivation. One is that Reopeners witnessed harm to others, which led them to take on the role of becoming advocates for others. Another: Reopeners formed the opinion that data and science presented to them were false, misleading, or inconclusive. And last: As the shutdowns provided people with time to reflect, investigate, and communicate, they increased the exchange of opinions with others, which in turn led them to seek out a broader community to evaluate the data, provide and receive support against hostility, and discuss next steps.

The studys appendix provides an interesting comparison of attributes between the Reopen Movement (required mental strength to defy) and the Tea Party (allows me to be proactive) and also with other recent mass movements, such as the antiScott Walker protests in Wisconsin, Occupy Wall Street, and Black Lives Matter. Its worth the read.

So, if its not Tea Party 2.0, then . . . how best to describe the Reopeners? Segal and Sorock suggest considering them as The New Untamed. Heres the studys conclusion:

The conventional media narrative is that America is a fractured nation, perhaps irreparably. Media characterize competing views about Coronavirus as a divide between the selfish and the selfless, and view Reopeners as putting their self-interests first. Study 2 shows that they are generally, in fact, isolated and seek out others to express dissent quietly so as not to be shamed for their questions. Based on the panel survey data, we conclude that the Reopen movement does not appear to be a re-hash of conservative mass movements like the Tea Party, and that Reopeners are strongly faith-driven and new to political activism.

This is consistent with an untamed mindset that the Frontier Center is tracking across many mass movements, ideologies, and topics. This mindset has many facets. Americans have been opting-out of safe and narrow paths in other areas, including by homeschooling, adopting cost-sharing plans to replace health insurance, and establishing home churches. The Frontier Center has also tracked a second pathway of compliance toward safety and peace of mind. Our values research with the Reopeners revealed a paradox: They find peace of mind through defiance, because it results in felt-freedom, understanding of their own mettle, holding authorities accountable, and standing up for others.

The data reveal that critics of the Reopen protesters are right that America needs renewed selflessness, but that they are wrong if they imagine that this results from compliance with flawed science and restricted freedom. A new selflessness can come from citizens who seek to remain untamed by authority. The Reopeners make clear that selflessness can be found in these everyday Americans who, while they do not seek to be political activists or agitators, feel compelled to act at what they believe is a defining moment in our history.

The protesters are demonstrating a new selflessness a sacrifice different from staying at home and closing nonessential businesses. Their selflessness requires moving into untamed territory, which in this case risks very real conflict with authorities. These Untamed are resisting out of duty to what they say is unlawful infringement of their rights based on unscientific, flawed premises that result in deeply troubling collateral damage to the American community.

The new untamed territory is a mindset. First, American society is profoundly divided over who is the hero and who is the antihero in our modern story. The threat of a pandemic reveals that selflessness based on fear isnt necessarily selflessness it may in fact be selfishness. Reopeners are demonstrating selflessness by their determination to overcome fear for what for them is a greater cause. The Frontier Center has found that this is a consistent factor in recent mass movements, and that the untamed mindset can be found across years, movements, political issues, and ideologies.

The New Untamed framework is critical for how we understand the meaning of the coronavirus conflict, and for what actions we take in the name of protecting America. Aggressive government efforts to stop the spread of Coronavirus makes sense if Americas health is defined by being protected from the virus. If that is an incorrect measure of Americas health, however, then shutdowns and restricting rights are counterproductive and harmful. They may weaken freedom, the true foundation of Americas health.

Far from being a threat to Americas health, Reopen protests may be its medicinesuggesting that American culture does not flourish by looking back but by retesting its convictions.

See more here:
The Tea Party and the New Untamed - National Review

Stop Using the Boston Tea Party to Justify Violence in Modern America – Daily Signal

Lawful protest in the American political process isnt the same as the lawless rioting, looting, and destruction of lives and property that became a threat to the public in the past week.

The death of a black man, George Floyd, at the hands of a white police officer May 25 in Minneapolis sparked widespread protests there and across America. Many of the demonstrations, despite the general lockdown and stay-at-home orders still in place during the coronavirus pandemic, have been peaceful.

However, in many cities, vandals and looters are destroying public and private property and ransacking minority-owned businesses among many others. Several people have been killed amid the violence.

Defacing a monument to the 54th Massachusetts, a regiment of all-volunteer black soldiers during the Civil War, hardly seems like an appropriate or reasonable protest of Floyds killing, or racism in America, or really anything else.

These shameful and destructive actions have been denounced by manyincluding Floyds familyand are a direct assault on the rule of law.

Unfortunately, some have taken to justifying the violence weve seen in recent days and have been making a direct comparison to the Boston Tea Party and other acts of rebellion in the American colonies leading up to the Revolutionary War.

The destruction of a police precinct is not only a tactically reasonable response to the crisis of policing, it is a quintessentially American response, and a predictable one, journalism professor Steven W. Thrasher at Northwestern University wrote in Slate, adding:

The uprising weve seen this week is speaking to the American police state in its own language, up to and including the use of fireworks to mark a battle victory. Property destruction for social change is as American as the Boston Tea Party.

The insinuation is that the destruction of the 3rd Precinct police station in Minneapolis, or looting and arson, is somehow in line with venerable American traditions and can lead to positive change within the American system of free government.

This is nonsense.

In the early 1770s, discontent was brewing in Boston and other parts of the British colonies in America in response to a series of acts passed in Parliament putting duties and taxes on various goods vital to the economy of the colonies.

The taxes were obnoxious enough, but what was truly intolerable to the American colonists was that they had no say in the laws, no avenue to have representation in the British Empires governing body.

The Tea Act of 1773, which led to the Boston Tea Party, actually was, in part, a lowering of a previous tax. This too was unacceptable. Yes, the taxes were bad enough, but the rate of taxation was not, ultimately, the issue at hand.

Instead, it was the colonists belief that they were living under an arbitrary and increasingly authoritarian government, that their pleas for change would be effectively ignored.

The American colonies, with a long history of self-rule and belief that they were British subjects just as much as those living in London, saw the actions of the British government as looming tyranny.

Instead of finding ways to accommodate the colonists fears, as some wiser statesmen such as Edmund Burke were imploring Parliament and King George IIIs ministry to do, the British government tightened the screws.

Confrontation was becoming inevitable.

Boston stewed with discontent in the winter of 1773. Colonists refused to let ships that brought tea owned by the East India Companyessentially a monopoly backed by Englandto be unloaded for sale in the city.

Its important to note too that colonists had negotiated for weeks simply to have the ships filled with tea sent back to England rather than force a confrontation. British law mandated that duties on goods aboard ships be paid within 20 days, or authorities would seize the ships and sell the items.

The owner of one of the tea-carrying ships, Francis Rotch, pleaded with the crown-appointed Massachusetts governor to allow him to sail back to England, but the governor repeatedly denied his request.

When Rotch returned to Boston on the evening of Dec. 26, 1773, and delivered the bad news to Bostons Committee of Correspondence that his request had been rejected, the die was cast.

A group of townspeople associated with a patriot group called the Sons of Liberty, many dressed as Mohawk warriors, went into action.

Historian Jack Rakove recounted what happened next in his book, Revolutionaries: Inventing an American Nation:

Once the Mohawks, numbering fifteen or twenty a vessel, boarded the ships, the crowd watched silently as 340 massive chests of East India Company tea were hauled on desk and whacked open with axes; then the contents were thrown overboard. By 9 P.M. a cargo valued at a hefty nine thousand pounds sterling was weakly brewing in the low-tide waters.

The Sons of Liberty carefully targeted their protest. They opposed an arbitrary and obnoxious tax, not a ship owner, and certainly didnt intend to harm Bostonians. They conducted themselves in as orderly afashion as possible.

In fact, Samuel Adams, one of the leaders of the Sons of Liberty, insisted that the protest occurred without the least Injury to the Vessels or any other property.

The Sons of Liberty broke a padlock to get to the tea inside, but replaced it the next day. They certainly didnt take that moment to rob their local businesses or burn buildings to the ground.

Not everyone was convinced. Notably, George Washington and Benjamin Franklin werent pleased with the property destruction, however justified, and disapproved when riots previously erupted in response to Parliaments Intolerable Acts, as they were called.

Franklin and Washington, like numerous other American colonists at the time, hoped that a lawful resolution was possible despite their opposition to the British governments actions in general.

Columnist Dan McLaughlin, writing in 2014 for The Federalist, was correct in saying the reason Americans so fondly remember the Boston Tea Party and other incidents of rebellion in the American colonies is not because rioting was morally justified or successful in bringing about its aims, but because we see the ultimate result that those outbursts led to the American Revolution.

The Boston Tea Party was an act of rebellion from a colony revolting against the use of arbitrary power, which the Declaration of Independence later explicitly cited as the reason for the colonies to separate from England.

The Constitution and the governing system created by the founding generation following the Revolution was designed to ensure that American citizens did not have to suffer arbitrary government. We, unlike the colonists of the 1770s, would have the chance to petition authorities, conduct elections, and seek representation in government.

Its worth noting that when groups of Americans organized militias to oppose taxes in the 1790s and threatened to topple local authorities in Pennsylvania, President George Washington personally led a military force to crush it.

Violent resistance to duly passed laws, whether good or not, would be met with force.

Laws may not change andas the world is not perfectinjustices will still occur under our system, but we have the tools to appeal to ballots over bullets that the colonists didnt. This is the cornerstone of liberty and self-government.

Associating the violent destruction of a police station and wanton looting of businesses this past week with the Boston Tea Party is an abuse of history. It makes a mockery of our constitutional, free government.

Read more:
Stop Using the Boston Tea Party to Justify Violence in Modern America - Daily Signal

‘You have to keep at it’: What Black Lives Matter demonstrators can learn from civil rights protests of the past – USA TODAY

George Floyd's family has called for protests in his honor to be peaceful, and many of them around the world are. Associated Press

SAN FRANCISCO Shahid Buttar, a Black Lives Matter activist running for Congress against fellow Democrat and House Speaker Nancy Pelosi,has been protesting in the streets for 20 years.

He knows the cost ofcivil dissent canbe high. Protesters can be injured or killed as evidenced by sometimesviolent confrontations between demonstrators and police in the ongoing national protests over the death of George Floyd, whodied after a Minneapolis police officer kneeled on his neck for roughly nine minutes on Memorial Day.

ButButtar is confident the time-honored tactic will once again spur societal change.

"This won't be a fast struggle," he says. "But we need to stay active and mobilize."

The United States has a long, storied history of protests and uprisings, starting withthe Boston Tea Party's rebellion against British rule. Fast forward two centuries later, public pressure is once again being brought to bear on a society that remains vexed by institutional racism born out of the nation's slave-owning roots.

When citizens clash with government forces, the effect is powerful, tugging at emotions and stealing headlines. But their power is not episodic but cumulative, historians say, with the most successful civil rights demonstrations creating change through incremental steps,building on one another to, at times, remakethe U.S. political landscape.

Protesters in downtown Detroit march and stop at the Detroit Police Station for a second night of protests on May 30, 2020.(Photo: Kelly Jordan, Detroit Free Press - USA TODAY Network)

Protest is the highest form of patriotism, its a way to say to our government, Hey, we are here! says Aaron Bryant, curator at the National Museum of African American History and Culture in Washington, D.C. Protests draw attention to needs, and then ideally other people become part of the movement, in boardrooms or museums or newspapers, and the dialog goes to another level.

The lesson for today's activists, experts say, is that protests should be seen asone tool in a box that must also include sustained grassroots organizing, meaningful change at the ballot box and shifts in cultural norms.

One need only look at the long road from overt Jim Crow discrimination to a more veiled racism that persists in American society today to see the struggle thats required to achieve lasting change,says Harold McDougall, a professor at Howard University Law School in Washington, D.C.

The first level of action is people in the streets saying we cant take it anymore, but we also need the help of those trained to fight within the system, says McDougall, who is at work on a book called Democracy at a Human Scale. More than anything, if youre going to move the dial, you have to keep at it.

The civil rights movement protests that flared in the mid-20th century have many signature moments that led to notable societal changes.

In 1954, protests helped spur the landmark Brown v. Board of Education ruling, in which the Supreme Court deemed racial segregation in public schoolsunconstitutional.

In 1955, Rosa Parks refused to relinquish her seat in the colored section of a Montgomery, Alabama, bus to a white passenger, eventually sparking a bus boycott led by a little known preacher named Martin Luther King, Jr.. A year later, the Supreme Court ruled against segregated public buses.

In this 1960 photo, student sit-in leader Rodney Powell, standing, talks with two of his companions after the lunch counter at a downtown Nashville Walgreen's Drug Store, which was closed by its owner when the sit-ins started. Protesters were aiming to desegregate such locales, and eventually succeeded as the nation's attention was drawn to their struggle. (Via OlyDrop)(Photo: Jimmy Ellis, Nashville Tennessean)

In 1960, black and white protesters staged sit-ins at segregated diners across the South, leading to a desegregation of public places in cities such as Nashville and Greensboro, North Carolina.

In 1963, 250,000 people joined King for his I Have a Dream speech at the March on Washington for equality and justice and focused a nation on the plight of black Americans and the poor.

And then a watershed: A year later, Democratic President Lyndon Johnson signed the Civil Rights Act, which was followed by the Voting Rights Act of 1965 and then the Fair Housing Act of 1968.

But as compelling as these results are, "it's not like someone does a dramatic protest action and policy changes the next day," saysDavid Meyer, professor of sociology at the University of California, Irvine and author of Politics of Protest: Social Movements in America.

"These actions only work in concert with some element of mainstream politics responding for its own reasons, whether they're morally or electorally motivated," he says. "With LBJ, you had both for example. The civil rights movement gave him political incentives to take action."

Meyer likens successful social protest movements to cracking a safe with multiple locks.

Its not about getting one lock to open, its opening multiple locks over time that ultimately leads to change," he says.

Indeed, those landmark legal cases and legislation came amidyears of protests and much death ranging from a bomb that killed four little girls in Birmingham to the assassination of King in 1968.

The Washington Memorial is seen behind the "Stone of Hope" statue at the Martin Luther King Jr. Memorial in Washington, D.C. on March 19, 2019.(Photo: MANDEL NGAN, AFP/Getty Images)

Andfoesunwilling to embrace the spirit of the new laws worked quickly to undermine them,says Peter Levy, professor of history at York College of Pennsylvania and author of The Great Uprising: Race Riots in Urban America During the 1960s.

Levy points out that after a wave of civil rights reforms and, in fact, likely because of these changes Americans voted in 1968 to electRepublican Richard Nixon, who ran on a law and order platform and launched the War on Drugs that sent hundreds of thousands of black people to prison in subsequent decades.

A general unwillingness of the nation to commit itself to undoing a legacy of discrimination in the education, employment and the justice system insured that systematic racism persisted, says Levy. In many ways, the issues on the streets today are the same issues that existed in the 60s and went unresolved.

Undaunted, activists persist, oftenfeeding their movement with a successful use of the media.

Sending shocking images around the nation and globe via television, magazines and newspaper stories in the 60s was critical to the success of Kings non-violent protest movement, says Todd Boyd, who holds the Katherine and Frank Price Endowed Chair for the Study of Race and Popular Culture at the University of Southern California in Los Angeles.

In this May 3, 1963 file photo, Walter Gadsden, 17, defies an anti-parade ordinance of Birmingham, Alabama, and is attacked by a police dog. Such images from the Civil Rights Movement played a big role in turning the nation's attention to the plight of African Americans and eventually led to the passage of a variety of laws meant to give people of color more rights.(Photo: Bill Hudson, AP)

His idea was, if people see this they might join our cause, Boyd says, referencing now infamous 1963 photographs and TV footage of police dogs and fire hoses being turned on black protesters by the police force in Birmingham, Alabama.

Decades later, when Rodney King was caught on tape being beaten by Los Angeles police officers in 1991, the images shocked most Americans if not black Americans.

Now, with the ubiquity of smart phones,nearly everyone has a camera in their pockets. Even if that hasnt stemmed the tide of death,its exposed whats already out there, but its made a difference," says Boyd. "Ive had a number of white people say that although they werent familiar with this sort of police behavior personally, this all is obviously very wrong.

As horrific as past incidents of police brutality against people of color have been, including the filmed shooting of Georgia jogger Ahmaud Arbery by armed white residents in February, the recent video of Floyd unsuccessfully begging for his life has shook the nation.

That video helps people try and walk in the shoes of their fellow African American citizens, says Omar Wasou, associate professor of politics at Princeton University in New Jerseyand a co-founder of the dot-com-era website, BlackPlanet. Theres no complexity. Its eightminutes and 46 seconds of a cop killing him before our eyes. Seeing that visceral and intimate act of state violence makes it hard to talk around.

Civil rights figures lead marchers across the Edmund Pettus Bridge during the recreation of the 1965 Selma to Montgomery march in Selma, Alabama, March 4, 1990. From left are Hosea Williams of Atlanta, Georgia Congressman John Lewis, Rev. Jesse Jackson, Evelyn Lowery, SCLC President Joseph Lowery and Coretta Scott King (glasses).(Photo: Jamie Sturtevant, ASSOCIATED PRESS)

Wasou studies protest movements and their impact on politics and elections. His analysis of the 60s civil Rights protests shows that activists then were trying to appeal to white moderates who wanted to promote racial equality but not at the expense of public order. By marching in southern cities apt to crack down on protesters, they were hoping to use television cameras to provoke a sense of outrage.

There are moments in all protest movements when theyre able to have their voices heard by a larger audience, because then as now, what the media covers has an effect on what the general public thinks, says Wasou.

For Janai Nelson, associate director and counsel for the NAACP Legal Defense Fund, todays protests seem familiar and like something new.

She says black America has always used protests to force the country to live up to its ideals, and often those protests have stemmed from killings.

The Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King Jr., head of the Southern Christian Leadership Conference, gestures during his "I Have a Dream" speech as he addresses thousands of civil rights supporters gathered in front of the Lincoln Memorial for the March on Washington for Jobs and Freedom in Washington, D.C., Aug. 28, 1963. Actor-singer Sammy Davis Jr. can be seen at extreme right, bottom.(Photo: ASSOCIATED PRESS)

There was Emmett Till, 14, lynched in 1955 for allegedly speaking to a white woman, a death that helped spur the civil rights movement. Jimmie Lee Jackson, 26, a civil rights activist killed by an Alabama State Trooper in 1965, which led to the Selma to Montgomery marches and later that year to the Voting Rights Act. And Trayvon Martin, 17, whose killing by neighborhood watchmanGeorge Zimmerman in 2012 led to the launch a year later of theBlack Lives Matter movement.

I truly hope this moment we are living through will continue, says Nelson. For the black people living this, they know if they relent it will be back to business as usual.

In many ways, activists and historians say, todays protests do feel noticeably different.

They are drawing a rainbow coalition of races and economic groups. And they are demanding systemic changes across a range of issues, from police reform to economic inequality, against a backdrop of the coronavirus pandemic and climate change,Buttar, the congressional candidate,said.

Shahid Buttar, who is running for Congress against fellow Democrat and House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, is shown here at a No War With Iran protest in San Francisco in January. Buttar is a veteran of 20 years of street protests.(Photo: Derrick Liu / Shahid Buttar for Congress Campaign)

The Internet is what makes these protests different from those in the 1960s, he says. It connects us and amplifies the message that this is a constitutional crisis in the middle of an economic and health crisis. Theres no pretense the status quo is OK.

Patrisse Cullors, co-founder of Black Lives Matter, saysstreets will stay filled until change comes. Until a poster that has meaning now but was spotted during the 1963 March on Washington We demand an end to police brutality now! no longer has relevance, she says.

Protests are a global signal that the collective has tried everything else and that hasnt worked, says Cullors, whose organizations name has come to embody the essence of the outrage from blacks and many whites alike over the plight of African Americans.

People being in the streets reminds us of our agency and our power, she says. Often were not safe out there. Not safe jogging, not safe driving, not safe walking. So when we challenge the status quo and step into those streets, were saying we are taking our power back.

Autoplay

Show Thumbnails

Show Captions

Read or Share this story: https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2020/06/05/george-floyd-and-black-lives-matter-protests-can-learn-1960-s/3124949001/

The rest is here:
'You have to keep at it': What Black Lives Matter demonstrators can learn from civil rights protests of the past - USA TODAY