Mediaboss Marketing

On Thursday morning, minutes after news broke of the worst quarterly economic collapse in U.S. history, U.S. President Donald Trump suggested delaying this years election.

With Universal Mail-In Voting (not Absentee Voting, which is good), 2020 will be the most INACCURATE & FRAUDULENT Election in history. It will be a great embarrassment to the USA. Delay the Election until people can properly, securely and safely vote??? he tweeted.

Trump has repeatedly railed against mail-in ballotswhich is how he casts his votesas an illegitimate form of voting, even though five states vote exclusively by mail and another 29 plus the District of Columbia allow no-excuse absentee ballots. (Which are, of course, sent by mail.) In the last presidential election, one-quarter of all votes cast were by mail. There is zero evidence that mail-in voting leads to increased voter fraud.

Trump doesnt have the authority to delay the electiononly Congress could do that, and even many Republican stalwarts in the House and the Senate were quick to shoot down Trumps suggestion on Thursday. But after almost four years of Trump, the idea that something cant happen just because it has never been tried or might be illegal doesnt reassure everyone.

To put Trumps suggestion in context, Foreign Policy spoke with Timothy Naftali, a presidential scholar at New York University. The interview has been edited for length and clarity.

FP: Is there any precedent for Trumps suggestion to delay the election?

Timothy Naftali: No. I think the way to frame this is to look at how the United States managed elections in the Civil War and in World War II: In 1864 and 1944, the United States had elections. In both cases, especially the Civil War, the country was convulsed. In World War II, that country was in the middle of a national emergency. And even so, the election happened as it was supposed to on the day it was supposed to.

There was no call for delay. Remember, no one but a man who lacks any historical knowledge or any commitment to the Constitution is calling for this. We have to keep in mind whats going on here. Theres no national call to delay the election. There are no local or state leaders of any number who are suggesting that the presidential election cannot be held as required in November. There is only one man with a Twitter finger.

This is a distraction by a man who is facing a massive political rejection. Theres no grounding or history for what hes suggesting. And thats why serious people in the last couple of hours responded by saying that this cant happen.

FP: If we look at not just Trump but the whole of the Republican Party, would you put this suggestion within the wider trends of the Republican Party or solely as a Trump phenomenon?

TN: Oh, thats an interesting question. I think theres a radical element on the American right that has sought to undermine democratic norms to hold on to power as a minority position in this country. And Donald Trump reflects that, but he didnt create that; he has benefited from it. The election of Donald Trump is a perfect storm of all of these various phenomena that weve seen in the last 20 years but especially since the Tea Party movement gained traction.

The irony of this moment is that the argument of Trumpists was that we needed a strict constructionist interpretation of the Constitution. And it is that which will save us from a presidential delay of a presidential election because the Constitution makes clear its up to the Congress to decide when we vote for the president. Its not up to the president to decide. So if you follow this strict constructionist approach, Trump is done on this issue, but I dont think theres any consistency in the Trump worldview, other than presenting power for Trump himself and access to power for his family.

And so theres now a struggle for the future of the Republican Party. I mean, will it be renamed the party of Trump? Should it be carrying [Abraham] Lincolns banner anymore? Its up to Republicans to determine that, but what we have seen on the right is systematic. We see on the right, as demographics have shifted in this country, and as public opinion has shifted on cultural and social issues, there have been those on the right who tried to use and find every institution and lever of power available to prevent democracy from being expressed in this country.

FP: I suppose the question is whether this is the Republican Party that tried and failed to repeal Obamacare or the party that managed to deprive Merrick Garland of a Supreme Court seat.

TN: Well, I think that were not talking about an organization. I dont think theres a central strategic core to this organization because theres no logical consistency to the ideas that Republicans have professed as an institution in the last 10 years. They went from being pro-free trade and pro-balanced budgets to protectionists and not seeming to care about the budget. Theyve been all over the map on immigration. Theyve been strict constructionists, but then many of them supported the use of the national emergency power to fund the wall [along the border with Mexico].

I dont see any logical consistency among professed Republican ideas in the last decade. The consistency is the desire for power and the desire to use whatever instruments are available to suppress the vote, to limit democracy, and to stay in office. And Trump is what seemed to be the perfect instrument. And Trump, of course, was very happy to have these ideas and tactics floating about because he likes to win.

Im not sure he ever really understood what it meant to be president. Im not sure he still understands it, because he doesnt seek a national mandate, but he loves winning. And he also doesnt mind cheating. And hes found people in the Republican Party who dont mind cheating either.

And so [Thursdays] tweet is hoping to find a way to cheat, but the Constitution gives the power to Congress and Congress is divided, and theres no way the House would approve this. And, listening to some of the GOP reactions, Im not sure that the Senate would approve shifting the date. So hes desperately looking for a way to cheat to avoid defeat in November. Im not saying whats going to happen, but the tea leaves suggest that if he doesnt cheat, hes going to lose.

Go here to see the original:
'The Tea Leaves Suggest That if He Doesn't Cheat, He's Going to Lose' - Foreign Policy

Herman Cain remembered the 1996 moment that changed his political trajectory as clearly as any in his life.

The businessman was advising Jack Kemps vice-presidential campaign and accompanied the boss to the iconic Sylvias soul food restaurant in Harlem for an event. A man in the crowd shouted out to Cain and his colleagues: Black Republicans? Theres no such thing. The same man, in Cains telling, called them Uncle Toms. The episode so angered Cain that when he got home from that campaign swing, he switched from a registered independent to a card-carrying member of the Republican Party. And over the next quarter-century, the child of the segregated South became one of the best-known Black Republicans in the country, briefly rising to be his partys presidential frontrunner for the 2012 nomination and remaining one of the most quotable stars in conservative media.

So committed to his partys stick-it-in-the-eye ethos was Cain that he flew to Tulsa, Okla., for President Donald Trumps first return to the campaign trail after 100,000 U.S. coronavirus deaths, despite dire warnings from public health experts. At that indoor rally on June 20, the stage 4 colon cancer survivor posed for pictures without wearing a mask and sat in the packed stands with fellow fans of the President. On June 29, Cain tested positive for the coronavirus. On July 2, his aides announced he had been hospitalized. While fighting the disease, his Twitter account continued to criticize mask-wearing and to promote unproven endorsements of hydroxychloroquine. On July 30, Cain aides announced he had died. From the White House, Trump attributed the death to the thing called the China virus. Cain, among the most prominent Americans to die during this pandemic, was 74.

In many ways, Cain and Trump were cut from the same cloth. Neither had been elected to any political post before running for the White House. Both delighted in needling the Republican Partys establishment and the mainstream press. They shot from the hip, campaigned in slogans and didnt much care to learn the details. Both men were dogged by allegations of sexual affairs and inappropriate behavior, and both denied the allegations; they proved disqualifying for Cainwho ended his bid in December 2011 under intense scrutinybut they did not derail Trump just one election cycle later. They were also both savvy exploiters of the media, often saying things they knew would provoke outrage and thus amplify the celebrity at the core of their bids. Indifference towardif not hostility againstwhat had come before was a cornerstone of their strategy, not a flaw.

Cain was born in Memphis in 1945 to a domestic worker mother and a janitor father. When his dad was hired to be the chauffeur for the head of Coca-Cola, the family moved to Atlanta, where Cain would graduate from Morehouse College. He then completed his graduate studies at Purdue University after civilian service in the Navy. From there, Cain moved from engineer to executive with Pillsbury and its subsidiaries of Burger King and Godfathers Pizza, where he would be its C.E.O. In 1988, he oversaw Godfathers buyout from Pillsbury. Throughout the same time, he held positions with the Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City. That part of his resum led Trump to consider Cain for a position in his Administration, a move that drew dissent from fellow Republicans who were not eager to revisit the allegations against Cain. For three years, Cain led the National Restaurant Association, a lobbying arm for the industry that paid settlements to at least two women who detailed Cains unwanted advances.

His was not a typical career in his post-C.E.O. years. Cain became a sought-after motivational speaker, an unsuccessful presidential candidate in 2000 and a Senate one in 2004. As the Tea Party movement started to organize after Barack Obamas election to the White House, Cain emerged as one of its strongest spokespeople. When the 2012 election cycle began, Cain decided to run the scrappiest of campaigns focused on an untraditional travel schedule that often seemed more like a book tour than an organizing effort. His novel 9-9-9 tax planproposing a 9% corporate business flat tax, a 9% personal income flat tax and a 9% national sales taxdrew eye-rolls from economists but curiosity from voters. Antipathy toward frontrunner Mitt Romney proved sufficient to give Cain a chance to rise in the late summer and fall of 2011, until his personal life just proved too much. But he didnt shrink from public life. Instead, he became a ubiquitous voice and reliable critic of Democrats.

Hell perhaps remain best known, though, for his tax plan that made little sense to most economists. Even with his death, the 9-9-9 sloganeering stayed on the front-burner. On Twitter, Romney took one last good-natured jab at the tax plan: St. Peter will soon hear 999! Keep up the fight, my friend.

For your security, we've sent a confirmation email to the address you entered. Click the link to confirm your subscription and begin receiving our newsletters. If you don't get the confirmation within 10 minutes, please check your spam folder.

Write to Philip Elliott at philip.elliott@time.com.

Read more here:
Herman Cain Helped Define the American Black Conservative Movement. He Also Set the Stage for Trump - TIME

With COVID-19 soaring out of control again in most of our states, and the national death toll climbing rapidly toward 200,000, what do we get from the self-proclaimed very stable genius in the White House?

Columns share an author's personal perspective and are often based on facts in the newspaper's reporting.

With COVID-19 soaring out of control again in most of our states, and the national death toll climbing rapidly toward 200,000, what do we get from the self-proclaimed very stable genius in the White House?

Another dose of hydroxychloroquine and an endorsement of some voodoo medical opinions, thats what.

The Chief Tweeter took to his favorite communications medium this past week to once again promote the multi-syllabic anti-malaria drug as an effective treatment for the disease caused by the coronavirus. Scientific studies have shown that hydroxychloroquine can actually do more harm than good when used to treat symptoms of COVID-19, but science matters not to the Chief Tweeter, who also recently said that 99 percent of the victims arent really very sick and recover very quickly.

Would he be so blas about a terrorist bomb blast that killed more than 150,000 people in and around the Trump Tower in New York City? Im trying to imagine his response to such a calamity and pair it with his cold-hearted dismissal of the COVID-19 death toll.

The Chief Tweeters source of medical expertise this time was some members of a group called Americas Frontline Doctors, who took part in an event sponsored by Tea Party Patriots Action, a dark money group that has helped fund a pro-Trump political action committee.

I think theyre very respected doctors, the Chief Tweeter said.

Really? Lets look at the credentials of the most outspoken of these very respected doctors. That would be Dr. Stella Immanuel, a Houston pediatrician who is also the spiritual leader of Fire Power Ministries, a church that preaches doctrine that would boggle the mind of even the most evangelical of evangelicals. Ah, yes; an industrious multi-tasker is Immanuel.

As a minister, Immanuel preaches that female gynecological disorders are caused by sexual intercourse with demons. These demons, that she calls spirit husbands and spirit wives, once walked the Earth in physical form, but they were not permitted aboard Noahs ark and consequently were drowned in the flood. Now, says Immanuel, these formless creatures visit humans during the night in sexy dreams, which are not really dreams but are actually spirit spouses having their way with their sleeping hosts.

According to Immanuel, these demons are responsible for diseases of the female reproductive system, male impotence, most financial troubles, marital discord and spiritual malaise.

And that aint all, folks. As a doctor, Immanuel also claims that some therapeutic drugs contain alien DNA, and that government scientists are working on a vaccine to prevent religious faith. This clinical claptrap is actually available for public perusal on YouTube.

You could also find Immanuels very respected advice on the Chief Tweeters Twitter feed, where she lauds the power of hydroxychloroquine as a COVID-19 cure and tells the public that masks are not needed to fight the pandemic. More than 10 million Americans read this advice from a very respected doctor before Facebook took down her page.

Immanuel responded to Facebooks action by threatening to have Jesus unplug Facebooks servers. My question: If Immanuel has so much influence with Jesus, why doesnt she ask him to banish the coronavirus to Hades?

This is the expertise that the Chief Tweeter and his son, Chief Tweeter Jr., shared on Facebook and Twitter. To their credit, both Facebook and Twitter removed the content in an effort to keep their sites free of potentially harmful information about the virus. Of course, this brought forth conservative claims of censorship.

Another of the very respected doctors, Simone Gold, complained about this so-called censorship by tweeting that there are always opposing views in medicine. Okay, thats why a second opinion is needed about the consumption of hydroxychloroquine and the wearing of masks.

This second opinion, which is extremely negative on the use of the drug and extremely positive on the wearing of the masks, has been offered numerous times by Dr. Anthony Fauci, the nations top infectious disease expert. This has made Fauci the target of several critical tweets by White House aides and conservative members of Congress, some of which have been retweeted by the Chief Tweeter.

Fauci said this past week that he will deal with the attacks by keeping his head down and doing his job. Imagine how much better life would be for all of us if only the Chief Tweeter would keep his head down and do his job for a change.

Glenn Ickler of Hopedale is a retired newspaper editor.

Go here to read the rest:
Column: If only the president kept his head down and did his job - Milford Daily News

For over 17 years WTR has brought the breaking news, strategic analysis, in-depth interviews and practical intelligence that truly matter to corporate and law firm trademark professionals. The latest delve into our unrivalled archive rediscovers issue 26 of the magazine, which was published 10 years ago this month.

Taking to the streets lessons in anti-counterfeiting

While trademark counsel rarely have the opportunity to take to the streets, valuable insights can be gained from the frontline experiences of investigators including the need to respect and understand

your enemy. Investigator Kris Buckner presented lessons from in the anti-counterfeiting trenches. Read more here.

Trademark infringement is there an app for that?

Apps are an accepted and valuable part of everyday life. A decade ago, though, Apples App Store and Google Play were just two years old. In 2010, the year the iPad was launched,WTRanalysis noted the need for software developers to walk a fine line between policing marks and allowing nominative use. Read morehere.

A web of confusion

A decade ago the question of how far Google could go when using third-party trademarks as keywords to trigger advertisements in its popular AdWords advertising programme was a hot topic. A recent decision in Europes highest court had seemingly clarified the position, but analysis suggested that, if you dug deeper, uncertainty remained. Read more here.

A celebration of corporate excellence

On 25 May 2010 WTR announced the winners of its fourth Industry Awards at an exclusive

ceremony in Bostons Harvard Club. We profiled the winners, with insights from the teams at Coty, Eli Lilly, Nokia, Pernod Ricard and many more. Read more here.

Inside the USPTO (July 2010)

David Kappos, then director of the USPTO, provided an update on operations at the office, outlined the Trademarks Next Generation project and discussed whether IP offices should get involved in anti-counterfeiting work. Read more here.

More than a tea party (2010)

Coming at the tail end of a global recession, the 2010 INTA Annual Meeting suggested that trademark practice was certainly rebounding; firm receptions and parties were in full swing and the conference had a discernible buzz. Read morehere.

Other instalments in the From the WTR archive series:

Follow this link:
From the WTR archive: A snapshot of trademarks a decade ago - World Trademark Review

Director and Writer: Kate Prince

Choreography: ZooNation

Commissioned to show alongside The Royal Ballets Alice in Wonderland, ZooNations The Mad Hatters Tea Party is the perfect companion piece to the now-classic ballet. As director, Kate Princes dance merges street and hip-hip with the anarchic feel of Lewis Carrolls novel.

We meet Ernest, a psychotherapist who is starting a new job. Working at the Institute for Extremely Normal Behaviour, Ernest is anxious to make a good first impression. Designed by Ben Stones, the Institute is a grey, numbing place devoid of colour and excitement. Normal here reads as bland, uneventful even conformist. Ernests challenge is to reform some newly-admitted patients, who claim to be from a place called Wonderland. He has one month to complete his task.

Holding a therapy session, Ernest (played by Tommy Franzen) isnt quite prepared for what he finds. The Wonderland patients tumble into the session, brimming with energy. The Institute, it is clear, has had little effect on them so far. Ernest struggles to maintain control of the room.

Part of the commission was for ZooNation to explore mental health issues, and The Mad Hatters Tea Party beautifully illustrates the individual struggles of Lewis Carrolls characters. The March Hare (a brilliant Bradley Charles) is unable to find love; Alice herself (a punk-ish energy from Kayla Lomas-Kirton) is dealing with an eating disorder. Ernest identifies their issues quickly, but finds himself asking whether naming the problem is enough. He begins to think beyond the Institutes fanaticism for normality. What if there is no normal? What if Wonderland really exists?

Princes dance language clearly delineates each character. We have hip-hop energy from The White Rabbit (Jaih Betote), the Ska influence of a fabulous Tweedle-Dum and Tweedle-Dee (Rowen Hawkins, Manny Tsakanika) and the Queen of Hearts wowing us with her grasp of ballroom (a commanding performance from the late Teneisha Bonner). By blending dance styles, Prince reminds us that one voice does not speak for everyone.

Right at the centre of the dance is of course, The Mad Hatter. Played by Isaac Baptiste, The Hatter is a calm, reassuring presence. In a performance loaded with charisma, Baptiste leads the story through its feverish beginning, clearing the way through conflict, to a resolution. He is the therapist Ernest longs to be.

In narrating their own stories, the characters leap out from the page. Being filmed, this production also gives us the advantage of getting up close to these performances. There is a psychological intensity to The Mad Hatters Tea Party that reminds us that Carrolls work was not only whimsical; it had a darker edge that ran against the cosy narrative of traditional childrens fiction. There is madness, there is loss, and there is no easy answer to either.

Accompanying this extraordinary range of contemporary dance, The Mad Hatters Tea Party is filled with music. Written by DJ Walde and Josh Cohen, we move from original songs, to pulsating beats that fill the theatre. Walde and Cohen mix and layer styles so that the music becomes another character, making this Tea Party a heady, exhilarating experience.

Finding something new in Carrolls text is a challenge. The dance looks beyond the curious tropes the fretful Rabbit, the grinning Cheshire Cat into what Carroll could not explicitly say, but instead inferred. Victorian England was its own Institute for Extremely Normal Behaviour, and any deviation from centre was regarded with great suspicion. In this suffocating atmosphere, Carroll wrote about the individual. Bizarre, contradictory and by definition, one of a kind. The Mad Hatters Tea Party not only explores the need for individualistic expression, but the role imagination has to play in our lives. It calls for a safer, kinder space; living without fear or judgement. In Carrolls time, as much as our own, its a message that bears repeating.

Available here until 14 August 2020

The Reviews Hub Score

The rest is here:
The Mad Hatter's Tea Party - #FromOurHouseToYourHouse, The Royal Opera House and The Roundhouse - The Reviews Hub