Mediaboss Marketing

This post may contain affiliate links; please read the disclosure for more information.

Mad Tea Party was an opening day attraction at both Disneyland (1955) and Walt Disney World (1971), and now, you can celebrate this dazzling, dizzying classic attraction with the newest Minnie Mouse: The Main Attraction collection for March, which includes a Minnie plush, pins, a mug, an ear headband, and more! You can check out the full collection below and click the item links to shop.

As a reminder, all Disney Stores are currently closed through the end of the month out of precaution for the ongoing Coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic. shopDisney has informed guests that while the collection is only available online for the time being, it will become available at Disney Parks and Disney Store upon their reopening.

Product Details:

Product details:

Heres a look at the interior fabric used in the backpack!

This months dizzyingly dapper entry is inspired by Mad Tea Party.

Created especially for Walt Disney World Resort and Disneyland Resort

Inspired by Mad Tea Party, this mugs design will send heads spinning for a second look.

Product details

This set, inspired by Fantasylands Mad Tea Party, makes the ultimate Un-Birthday gift for any collector!

Product details

Related

More here:
SHOP: New "Minnie Mouse: The Main Attraction" Mad Tea Party Collection for March Now Available on shopDisney - wdwnt.com

Elizabeth Shewell created a Facebook group called 2020 Social Distancing Tea Party

by: Briana Ray-Turner

Credit: Up-Free via Pixabay

BERLIN CENTER, Ohio (WKBN) A music teacher from Western Reserve Elementary is giving social distancing a new meaning.

Elizabeth Shewell created a Facebook group called 2020 Social Distancing Tea Party.

In the group, people can post pictures of whatever they are drinking as well as connect with and update each other on life.

Shewell says it all started when she was drinking tea everyday while staying at home.

The group started with only her close friends, but now it has over a thousand members, even including people from out of the county.

Its become really a supportive group of, you know, were in this together, and people arent seeing each other, but we can still share our days with each other, Shewell said.

She says her hopes are to reach even more people.

See the article here:
Western Reserve music teacher gets creative with social distancing - WKBN.com

Michael and Molly Talbot thought their 10th birthday on March 25 would be their worst yet. Their mother, Deborah, erected a sign outside their house on Maloon Avenue in Franklin Square telling passersby to honk for their birthday, but Michael was just planning on spending the day playing video games alone, and Molly figured she would just play on her iPad and watch television rather than have the American Girl Doll tea party she dreamed of.

But around 2 p.m., the Talbots heard a loud commotion outside, where dozens of their friends families passed by in their cars wearing costumes, honking their horns and wishing the twins a happy birthday.

That moment became the twins favorite part of their birthday, their father John, recounted. Michael said he loved it, and thought it was so fun, and Molly said, It blew my mind to see everyone come down the street.

She had spoken to her friend, Alana Freifeld, that morning, and told her how she was disappointed in her birthday this year, as New Yorkers are encouraged to self-isolate to stop the spread of COVID-19. Fortunately, Alanas mother, Dawn, overheard the conversation and immediately asked everyone in the childrens fourth-grade class at the Washington Street School if they could help make Michael and Mollys birthday special by driving by their house.

Lauren McManamy, another mother of a boy in the class, then reached out to the members of Cub Scout Pack 372, which Deborah Talbot is the assistant den mother of. In the end, she said, they had nearly a dozen cars drive down the street to celebrate the twins birthday.

I think it went well, McManamy said, despite the poor weather and the parade being planned in only about four hours.

In fact, she said, the birthday parade was extended beyond just visiting the Talbots house, as Pack Leader Dorine Dand directed the group to another fourth-graders house, a 6-year-olds house and another classmates house whose birthday was one week prior.

We all felt like we were doing something to make someones day special, said Dawn Freifeld, and that felt great.

She said she thought it was important to ensure that children are not feeling alone during the pandemic, and therefore created a Facebook group to organize more birthday parades for children in the Franklin Square community, based on the success of the Talbots parade.

It gets everyone involved, McManamy said of the group. But I think its super important in this time to let these kids know the community is here. We will get through this together, be here for one another, and if that means [putting on] a parade, well then thats what well do.

For more information about the birthday parade group, visit https://www.facebook.com/groups/199086638182516/.

Read the original post:
Franklin Square residents spread birthday cheer - liherald

Think Well, Think Different is a series of columns devoted to discussing trends in fintech, both from the consumer and founder points of view. Click here for previous columns.

For the last few years, we have heard that the establishment is under threat. Challenges from minority political ideologies, democratizing technology platforms and innovative employment and financial relationships.

Heres a nonexhaustive list of some of the major political, consumer, and societal trends that have lead us to where we are today: Tea Party, Uber, Occupy Wall Street, bitcoin, Facebook, Tyler Perry, Paypal-Venmo, rise of Square, Netflix, Airbnb, Spotify, Black Lives Matter, Twitter, Amazon, Donald Trump, Bernie Sanders, Tesla, #MeToo, Instagram, and finally, global pandemic, COVID-19.

It is not important to identify when these challenges began, but the key question is what happens next.

CEOs, investors, and politicians all try to predict where business/consumers/voters are headed (the third group significantly more poorly than the first two). Its pretty much the whole job. Steer the company, the fund, the country in the right direction while operationalizing the ability to react and respond as needed.

There was a time when it appeared the challengers had the establishment on its heels. Remember when Bernie Sanders was leading the Democratic Party primary to a potential run against Populist President Donald Trump. It seems like ages ago now, but it was only a few weeks ago. Trump, still President obviously, appears to be headed for a general election against establishment stalwart Joe Biden...assuming, that is, we have a General Election in November. Only kidding. Sort of.

The starts and stops of how the Challengers will upset the establishment go back well beyond the recent examples above. For a time, the gig economy was going to revolutionize how we work. The insurgency was decoupling work from singular W-2 employment with one employer.

Prior to the 1980s, success was found comfortably within the establishment of corporate America. Not only did working for the same company for ones entire career offer stability, but the company paid for retirement as a defined benefit (DB) to long-term employees. Here in Detroit, it is not uncommon to meet people whose father worked for the same auto manufacturer for 40 years (and, in some cases, that is the same company where the familys grandfather worked as well).

Starting in 1980, the proportion of private wage and salary workers participating in DB pension plans fell from about 40% to 20%, according to the Bureau of Labor Statistics. Though we spent the 2010s assuming it would be gig economy workers or freelance workers that defined the next 10 or more years of work, the increase in those workers, defined by a primary income source, did not materialize. Perhaps more salaried workers took on a second or side job, but between 2005 and 2015 the number of gig workers stayed relatively consistent at 5% of workers, at least based on tax filings.

Similarly, the threat of fintech on big banks has been framed as an attack on the establishment. In fintech, however, there have been more serious threats than those posed by gig workers on corporate America. Technology platforms connecting users with providers more efficiently have improved access and, in some instances, lower costs.

Certainly, peer-to-peer payment platforms saved time and money over the previous system of reconciling checks, removing cash from ATMs or simply owing someone $20 indefinitely. At the same time, direct deposits never really lost control over the primary source of cash. Cryptocurrency challenged central banking. Bitcoin, Ethereum, and Ripple offered alternatives to a sovereign currency and international money transfer, but regulators have pushed back.

The push and pull of establishment and insurgency is American history in many ways.

What makes 2020 different is a third threat. A true disruptor to everyone establishment and Insurgent alike.

COVID-19, the novel coronavirus, has everyone rethinking work, home, and even love. Thinking about COVID-19 in the context of a disruption makes sense because it demands we rethink how we do just about everything. From within our businesses to within our lives, everyone is asking the same question. How much will change after the COVID-19 threat subsides?

Story continues

For instance, a threat of this magnitude could scare consumers (and voters) back to safety, safety in the establishment. At the same time, a threat this fundamental to who we are and how we live could inspire consumers (and entrepreneurs) to take more chances. After all, life is short.

More than likely these choices will not be binary. It is wrong to prepare for EVERYTHING to change or NOTHING to change. The hard predictions (or bets) are which things stay the same and which change. As you evaluate your business and start to plan for the future, one helpful framework for trying to prepare for whats next is to consider the establishment or the insurgency? There is security in the establishment. There is energy in the insurgency.

Just as Donald Trump proved in 2016 that the insurgency can win (and take over the establishment), the COVID-19 crisis response might empower (and inspire) customers and creators alike to break free from traditional corporate America. Banks may find that customers move to fintech platforms or nonbank lenders more easily, especially if the perception is that the bank is not responsive or attentive during the crisis.

On the other hand, banks (even old traditional ones) that rise to meet the consumers need for flexibility and leniency may win back customers who had started to stray. In moments of crisis, many people look for comparisons. One common comparison I heard from financial services companies this week was lets use the policy we did after 9/11.

Right now, your customers are working from home, and, unless you are a hospital or a grocery store, your team is working from home too. It is said it takes anywhere from 22-28 days to form a new habit. Many of us are halfway there. What habits are your customers forming? How will your team and your business respond?

Step one watch the technology, market and social media trends over the next few weeks. Indicators on risk and anxiety will inform whether most people are looking for safety or an escape.

Step two offer small tests. Marketing and messaging are sensitive areas right now. As the crisis (hopefully) subsides, use discreet offers or, if possible, A/B tests to get a sense how customers might react differently when the restrictions are lifted.

Step three react quickly. The longer the work-from-home recommendations and social distancing protocols last, the greater the likelihood of changes from the pre-COVID-19 market. When you begin to gather insights and see consumer trends take shape, be early and slightly wrong (and adjust) than late and exactly right.

Theres no historical example from our lifetime to compare to this moment. One advantage we have is information. Historically, the establishment had the information. Today, the insurgency has the same information, a voice, and a stage. The true test is not whether the establishment is invincible, but whether the insurgency or the challengers will be able to overcome this threat to stability and emerge more capable. And if so, what will that mean for you, your products, and your business?

Photo byRyoji IwataonUnsplash

See more from Benzinga

2020 Benzinga.com. Benzinga does not provide investment advice. All rights reserved.

Excerpt from:
Think Well, Think Different: How Will COVID-19 Disrupt The Establishment? - Yahoo Finance

In 2009, the last time Washington aimed a trillion-dollar firehose at the distressed U.S. economy, the president, a Democrat, repeatedly coupled that act of temporary profligacy with the rhetorical aim of long-term budgetary sobriety.

"One of the central goals of this administration is restoring fiscal responsibility," Barack Obama asserted back then. "Even as we have had to spend our way out of this recession in the near term, we've begun to make the hard choices necessary to get our country on a more stable fiscal footing in the long run."

There were plenty of reasons for contemporaneous skepticism about Obama's claims, but even insincere nods toward a presumed virtue can contribute to a mild braking on vice. Policy battles over deficits, debt ceilings, and old-age entitlements dominated national politics through the end of 2013, and not merely because of then-ornery, now-quiescent Tea Party Republicans. Erskine Bowles, after all, was a Democrat.

But the twin rise of President Donald Trump and Sen. Bernie Sanders (IVt.), along with the strains of populism they channeled, chased deficit hawks to the despised corners of polite society by 2015. After that, the main questions left were how many zeroes would end up on the federal check when the next crisis inevitably hit.

George W. Bush's Emergency Economic Stabilization Act of October 2008 came with a $700 billion price tag. Add in Obama's $833 billion American Recovery and Reinvestmenty Act in February 2009, and we're talking a bailout/stimulus combo of $1.53 trillion, or $1.84 trillion in 2020 dollars.

By comparison, the bipartisan stimulus that was very temporarily held up by the near-universally despised Rep. Thomas Massie (RKy.), totals around $2.3 trillion, according to the bean-counters at the Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget. Even accounting for population increase (the U.S. had 307 million residents in 2009, around 331 million today), that's an inflation-adjusted per capita increase from around $6,000 11 years ago to $6,950 today.

How much is $2.3 trillion? In nominal terms, it's the same as the entire federal budget for Fiscal Year 2004. Adjusting for inflation gets you back to the federal government's $1 trillion outlay for 1987. Inflation and population together take you back to 1974. In short, Congress just approved a bailout/stimulus of $6,950 per person, which is more than the $6,600 per person in constant dollars that the entire federal government spent in Richard Nixon's final year in office.

The accumulated national debt in 1974 was $475 billion, or around $2.5 trillion in today's money ($11,700 per U.S. resident). George W. Bush inherited we-owe-yous of $5.67 trillion (which adjusts to $8.52 trillion and $30,200 per capita), and left for Obama a present of $10 trillion ($12 trillion/$39,600). As Trump readies his black sharpie for the rescue package, the debt clock stands at $23.6 trillion ($71,300 per person)and it was being goosed by trillion-dollar annual deficits even before COVID-19 hit the fan.

And unlike Obama in 2009, Trump doesn't currently feel the need to even rhetorically hint at future tradeoffs. The president reportedly said in late 2018 about any future fiscal crisis: "Yeah, but I won't be here." Add in the likelihood of future bailouts and stimuli, and basically we're all Modern Monetary Theorists now.

The annual budget deficit, which snapped an entire generation of conservatives into attention when it crossed the $1 trillion threshold a decade ago, is likely to top $2 trillion before the fiscal year is out. The Government Accountability Office and Congressional Budget Office were calling the country's long-term fiscal outlook "unsustainable" back when the good times were still rolling. Now revenues are taking a massive hit, demand for government service is going through the roof, and the U.S. Mint's going brrrrr.

Libertarians back in 2008-09 tended to make four types of predictions about the bailout/stimulus. Onethat the unpredented swooshing of cash and Federal Reserve intrusion into the economy would trigger long-dormant inflationdid not come to pass, and so many policy enthusiasts have taken that as a cue to ignore libertarians.

But there were three other forward-looking objections to socializing the failures of deep-pocketed losers during the financial crisis: that the ensuing debt load would unduly dampen the eventual recovery, that failing to fix the underlying government distortions that caused malinvestments in the first place would make bailouts an eternally recurring phenomenon, and that papering over problems with money would create new, even more dangerous bubbles.

With today's Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security (CARES) Act, Congress has cemented what we already suspected: that the federal government does not care about learning from directly relevant mistakes it made in the recent past.

There is no more politics of fiscal prudence in America, just a competition to see who can wag the biggest firehose. While the bodies begin to pile up in New York City and elsewhere, Washington has responded with a massive course of experimental economics. May we respond better than rats in a cage.

Follow this link:
How Much Is $2.3 Trillion? More Than Even Obama Could Imagine - Reason