Archive for the ‘Tea Party’ Category

Did Mitt Romney Save His Soul? – The New Yorker

Mitt Romney and his family are gathered inside a budget hotel room. It is January, 2008, and the New Hampshire primary is just days away. Romney, a candidate for the Republican Presidential nomination, sits in a high-backed chair, clad in his usual armor: a navy-blue tie, a gleaming white shirt with cufflinks, and dress pants. His wife, Ann, is seated next to him; two of his sons and a daughter-in-law are arrayed around them. Romneys campaign is going poorly. He lost badly to Mike Huckabee, the former Arkansas governor, in the Iowa caucuses, and in New Hampshire he appears on track to lose again, this time to Senator John McCain. Maybe you just wait a few years? one of Romneys sons suggests. Romney seems to dismiss the possibility. When this is over, Ill have built a brand name, he says. People will know me. Theyll know what I stand for. He pauses. The flippin Mormon, he says, his face broadening into a half smile. There are some titters from his family, more deflated than amused. Later, the clan kneels on the floor to pray. Romney bows his head, his elbows resting on the chair. In her prayer, Ann thanks God for His blessings and says that the family desires only to serve Thee and to bring greater light to this earth.

This moment, captured in the 2014 documentary Mitt, encapsulates the enduring paradox of Mitt Romney. After serving as a moderate governor in Massachusetts, where his signature accomplishment was enacting universal health care, he went through an ideological and tonal makeover as he labored, during two failed Presidential campaigns, to navigate the rightward lurch of his party. He never shed the aspersion that he was a flip-flopper, a man lacking true conviction. During a Republican candidate forum in New Hampshire, in 2008, McCain turned to Romney and said, We disagree on a lot of issues, but I agree you are the candidate of change. On the hustings, Romney often came across as starched and stiff, like his crisply ironed dress shirts. Voters struggled to get a genuine sense of him. And yet his core has always been evident to those granted entre to his world. It was evident in that New Hampshire hotel room, and its evident throughout McKay Coppinss instructive new biography, Romney: A Reckoning, in which the politicians Mormon faith emerges as the substrate that nourishes all else in his life.

It is no accident that both Coppins and Greg Whiteley, the director of Mitt, are fellow-members of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints. Coppins relies on dozens of interviews with Romney, as well as hundreds of pages of personal journals and private correspondence, to narrate Romneys interior journey as his ambitions and principles increasingly come into conflict. The result is a rare feat in modern-day political reporting: an account in which the subject engages in actual introspection. Romney spent years contorting himself for the hard-right elements in his party, eventually becoming the G.O.P.s standard-bearer during the 2012 election. In interviews, he spoke about the rationalizations hed made over the years and his capacity for self-justification, as Coppins puts it. But when Donald Trump won the Presidencythe moment of reckoning in the books titleRomney decided to fling himself into the fray. The forces of populism and outrage had already overtaken the Republican Party. The question was whether Romney could find redemption for himself.

The Epistle of James admonishes believers to be doers of the word, not just hearers. Without works, the epistle explains, faith is empty. The manner in which faith becomes works in politics, however, can be like an intricate knot, with many folds. Black evangelicals and white evangelicals share theological beliefs but diverge on their partisan affiliations. There is a rich social-justice tradition in Roman Catholicism, yet many conservative Catholics are foot soldiers of the right. Religion offers a compass but not a map. Universal health care? Balancing the budget? Protecting the border? The Scriptures and other religious texts are silent. One can identify broad principlesand sometimes even these are contradictorybut specific policies must emerge from human wisdom and processes.

Romneys process came from another deeply rooted identity: the data-driven businessman. In the nineteen-seventies, after graduating with joint M.B.A. and law degrees from Harvard, Romney began working in the burgeoning field of management consulting. He eventually landed at Bain & Company, where he quickly became a star. Bains leaders put him in charge of a new investment firm, Bain Capital, which identified ailing companies to invest in, overhauled them from within, then sold them for profit. The firm made Romney fabulously wealthy and helped to launch his political career. It also shaped his governing in Massachusetts, where he saw himself primarily as a partisan of pragmatism, not an ideologue. His approach to the health-care issue was illustrative. I dont look and say, Whats the conservative point of view on this? he told Coppins. I ask, What do I think is the right answer to a particular problem? When Romney began considering a run for the Presidency, pitching himself to conservative audiences, he had a new set of data points to consider. He remade himself into a crusader on social issues; a lifelong hunter, even though he had gone hunting only twice in his life; and a zealot on illegal immigration. Romney thought little about the authenticity of his new persona. It was a matter of simple math, Coppins writes.

Even as Romney was remaking himself on the stump, his faith remained an abiding presence. Evangelical Christians, a crucial voting bloc in Republican primaries, consider Mormonism to be a heresy. Some of Romneys supporters suggested that he distance himself from his faith. Romney declined. According to Coppins, it was perhaps the only part of his life that he refused to compromise on. He prayed on buses and before debates, read the Scriptures daily, and avoided scheduling campaign events on the Sabbath. Romney even arranged for the Churchs Boston temple to hold a late-night session for him and his family, an unusual accommodation. Romney craved the closeness to God he experienced during those sacred worship ceremonies, Coppins writes. Swapping his presidential-candidate costume for the simple white clothing of the temple that night, he felt fully, truly like himself.

Perhaps the most stirring moment in Romneys campaign came on December 6, 2007, when Romney decided to address concerns about his faith directly, in a speech at the George H. W. Bush Presidential Library and Museum, in College Station, Texas. I believe in my Mormon faith and I endeavor to live by it, he said. Some believe that such a confession of my faith will sink my candidacy. If they are right, so be it. But I think they underestimate the American people. Americans do not respect believers of convenience. Americans tire of those who would jettison their beliefs, even to gain the world. Two months later, Romneys campaign was over.

When it came time to decide whether to enter the 2012 Presidential campaign, Romney was conflicted. The press generally considered him the Republican front-runner, but most of his family opposed another bid. The right was undergoing a transformation. The Obama Presidency had helped to incite the anti-establishment Tea Party movement, and the G.O.P.s restive, grievance-fuelled grass roots didnt seem particularly hospitable to a patrician figure like Romney. He was also resolved to avoid the contortions of 2008. Of course, I would want to win, but feeling that I have been true to what I believe is even more important, Romney wrote in an e-mail to advisers.

The campaign decided to relentlessly focus on the economy; Romney had always been most comfortable making his case as a turnaround specialist. But, in Coppinss telling, Romneys advisers continued to nudge him to tend to the far right. His rhetoric on immigration verged on nativist; during one Republican debate, he suggested self-deportation for undocumented immigrants. He also sought the endorsement of Trump, who had spent months stoking baseless conspiracy theories about Obamas birthplace. Romney captured the nomination but was trounced by Obama in the election. That night, when one of his advisers raised the prospect of yet another campaign, he insisted, My time on the stage is over, guys.

Romney first encounters Donald Trump in the fourth chapter of Coppinss book. It is 1995, and Trump has invited Romney to spend the weekend at his extravagant estate at Mar-a-Lago. According to Coppins, Romney found the experience deeply weird, and figured he would never see Trump again. The magnates rise in the polls, during the 2016 nominating contest, befuddled him. He and Ann watched Trumps rallies, where the spectre of violence seemed omnipresent. Those people werent at our events, Ann said. When it became clear that Trump might win the Republican nomination, Romney scrambled to stop him, delivering a speech denouncing him as a phony, a fraud, and later working behind the scenes to send the nomination to the convention. He had predicted to friends that Trump would win the election. Even so, he was unprepared when it happened.

Yet Romneys resistance to Trump did not proceed in a straight line. He famously flirted with joining the Trump Administration as Secretary of State. When a photo of the two men meeting over dinner at Jean-Georges, the lavish restaurant inside the Trump International Hotel and Tower in New York, went viral, the flip-flopper memes returned. In the orange-and-yellow-hued image, Trump appears to be almost cackling; Romney looks chagrined, his eyebrows raised and his lips drawn together. He later insisted to Coppins that his expression had nothing to do with Trump. It had to do with the awkwardness of being in a public restaurant and cameras coming and taking pictures, he said. After the dinner, he told reporters that he had increasing hope that president-elect Trump is the very man who can lead us to a better future. According to Coppins, Trump called Romney and told him that he needed to come out with a stronger statement: Trump was terrific and would be a great president. Romney could suffer the pretense no longer. Maybe after so many years of allowing the petty indignities and moral compromises to pile up, he had finally reached his limit, Coppins writes.

Coppins details Romneys growing alarm during Trumps first few months in office: the travel ban; the exodus from the State Department; the statement, after a white-nationalist rally in Charlottesville, that there were very fine people on both sides. At one point, Romney jotted down a line from William Butler Yeatss poem The Second Coming, written after the First World War: The best lack all conviction, while the worst / Are full of passionate intensity. This was the new Republican Party, in Romneys mind. In the fall of 2017, he decided to return to politics, running for a Senate seat in Utah. Money is motivating when you dont have it and when you are young, he wrote in his journal. A purpose greater than self is what motivates now. That purpose was to become a counterweight to Trump.

In the Senate, Romney seemed to grow in stature and fortitude. Gone was the caution that had paralyzed him during his Presidential bids. He became one of the few in his party willing to criticize Trumps excesses. On December 18, 2019, the House voted to impeach the President over allegations that hed withheld military aid from Ukraine in order to pressure its President, Volodymyr Zelensky, into launching investigations that would benefit Trump politically. Preparing for the Senate trial, Romney studied Federalist No. 65, in which Alexander Hamilton argues that the Senate is the only institution with sufficient independence to handle a trial with necessary impartiality. The trial lasted just five days.

Romney was frustrated by his Republican colleagues. How unlike a real jury is our caucus? he wrote in his journal. One evening, after the Senate had recessed, Romney returned to his office, knelt on the floor, and prayed. Later, he listed in his journal the potential consequences of voting to convict Trump: he would be ostracized in the Senate; Fox News would tear into him, stoking up the crazies; the President would attack him mercilessly, or use the government to hurt his sons; Romney might need to move from Utah. That night, at his town house in Washington, he slept poorly, waking before dawn to review the case again. In his office, he convened his staff and told them that he had reached a verdict.

On February 5, 2020, Romney stood at the lectern in the Senate chamber to explain his decision to become the first senator in American history to vote to remove a President from his own party. As a Senator-juror, I swore an oath, before God, to exercise impartial justice, he said. I am profoundly religious. My faith is at the heart of who I am. Here, Romney paused for several seconds, his eyes downcast, seemingly overcome. I take an oath before God as enormously consequential, he went on. Disregarding that oath for a partisan end, he said, would expose his character to the censure of my own conscience. He acknowledged that many in his party and his state would disagree with the decision. He also acknowledged that his vote would not remove Trump from office. I will tell my children and their children that I did my duty to the best of my ability, he said, believing that my country expected it of me.

After the speech, Romney reached Ann by phone. She described watching his address as a spiritual experience. In the days that followed, as vitriol rained down on Romney, he thought of Parley Parker Pratt, an early Mormon missionary and a distant ancestor, who had toiled for months in New York City without winning any converts, but who one day received a vision of assurance from the Lordthat his labor had not been in vain, that his sacrifice had been accepted. Romney wrote in his journal that a huge weight had been lifted, that the anxiety is gone.

In the spring of 2021, Coppins and Romney began meeting weekly, in secret, for interviews that sometimes went on for hours. Several months had passed since the January 6th insurrection, and Coppins writes that Romney often sounded like a spy behind enemy lines. Romney confided that much of his party really doesnt believe in the Constitution. He was mulling difficult questions, including his own culpability in what had become of the G.O.P.: Was the rot on the right new, or was it something very old just now bubbling to the surface? And what role had the members of the mainstream establishmentpeople like him, the reasonable Republicansplayed in allowing that rot to fester?

Last month, Romney announced, at the age of seventy-six, that he would not seek relection in the Senate. He cited his age in his decision, declaring that it was time for a new generation of leaders. According to Coppins, Romney has had recurring premonitions of his death. His church teaches him that, one day, he will stand before God and face an accounting, for his thoughts, words, and works. He will have to explain his time in politicsthe positions he took, the compromises he made, where he chose to stand firm. If Romney is at a loss, he might bring along Coppinss record of his reckoning.

Read more:
Did Mitt Romney Save His Soul? - The New Yorker

Kevin McCarthy’s Downfall Is the Culmination of the Tea Party – POLITICO

The tea party that Skocpol was referring to no longer formally exists as a faction in Congress, its erstwhile allies having been subsumed into the far-right Freedom Caucus or into the generic America First wing of the GOP. But according to Skocpol, the history of the tea party remains essential to understanding the forces that ultimately led to McCarthys political demise.

It represents the culmination of [the tea party movement], said Skocpol. All the research that I and other political scientists have done on the movement shows that by the 2010s just before Donald Trump emerges the tea party had taken the shape of a just-say-no, blow-it-all-up, dont-cooperate, do-politics-on-Twitter faction and this is the perfect expression of it. This is where it leads.

In some respects, Skocpols argument is counterintuitive. In the late 2000s and early 2010s, McCarthy and the other Young Guns rose to power by harnessing the grassroots power of the tea party movement, promising to slash government spending, constrain federal power and foil the Obama administrations policy goals. But though McCarthy and the other Young Guns rose to prominence by allying themselves with the tea party movement, Skocpol said, their banishment from the GOP doesnt mark a break with the movements legacy. Instead, it shows that the Young Guns never really understood the forces that they helped unleash.

The fact that McCarthy and the other Young Guns were once called tea party people because they dallied with the movement, Skocpol said, does not mean that the tiger wasnt going to consume them in the end.

The following has been edited for clarity and concision.

Ian Ward: Youve written extensively about the history of the tea party movement and its aftereffects for the Republican Party. How does the vote to oust Speaker McCarthy fit into that history?

Theda Skocpol: Shortly into Barack Obamas presidency, we saw this explosion of tea party demonstrations and a remarkable degree of grassroots organizing a couple thousand local tea parties, according to our research. There was a lot of writing at the time claiming that this organization was motivated by the same thing that people now claim drives the Republican Party when they shut down the government cutting the deficit. But it was never about cutting the deficit. The popular side of the tea party was about anger and fear of a changing country in which a guy with Hussein as his middle name and black skin could be elected president. The tea party especially at the grassroots was trying to pressure the Republican Party and its elected leaders not to compromise with a changing country or with Democratic Party politicians in Washington.

Ward: How did the Young Guns fit into that mobilization?

Skocpol: The tea party mobilization made a big difference electorally in 2010 in installing a Republican Congress, and probably even more importantly in installing Republican-dominated state legislatures. But it was especially potent after that in undoing any effort at compromise over immigration. Our research shows that polarization over immigration between the two major parties has played out recently and piled on top of the polarization over the civil rights revolution of the 1960s. By the time you get to the period at the end of Barack Obamas presidency, hes trying to find a way to incorporate long-present immigrants from Mexico and Central America and give them a path to citizenship and that effort falls apart in 2013 and 2014. Remember that election in which David Brat in central Virginia shockingly felled Eric Cantor, who at that time was seen as the kind of rising golden boy on the Republican right? It was anger over the potential of immigration reform that played a big role in that.

And then you have Paul Ryan, who inherited a Congress where the Republican caucus was increasingly riven by the rise of this angry, just-say-no style that the tea party always favored. They wanted to make sure that people were angry about changes in the country and wanted to make sure Republicans were not compromising about those. Paul Ryan was [from] Mr. Kochs network. I think that House Republicans thought that by making him their leader, they would cement their right-wing Republican credentials and it did with the elites around the Republican Party at the time. But among the populist right who make up more than half of Republican base voters and the most loyal primary voters they never liked what he had to offer. So he was gone before long.

And now finally, we get to Kevin McCarthy, who is just an example of the final transmogrification of the tea party anger, which was given a national focus and much more potency by Donald Trump. Donald Trump didnt create all this. Hes just been very good, ever since 2015, at giving it permission and focus.

Ward: McCarthy and the other Young Guns who rose to power during that tea party moment in the late 2000s and early 2010s gave voice to one interpretation of the tea party movement that you mentioned, which is that it was all about fiscal conservatism and small government. Why do you think they so dramatically misunderstood the energies behind the movement?

Skocpol: We have to understand the radicalization of the Republican Party as a process that has been underway since 2000. Act 1 of that radicalization was the rise of the Koch network, which was itself motivated by displeasure with what the Republicans under Bush junior and senior had been doing for example, passing Medicare expenditures. The Koch network outflanked the Republican Party, and they put a lot of pressure on candidates and officeholders to hew the line on cutting taxes, cutting regulations and disabling public sector unions. These Young Guns were initially in tune with that and why wouldnt they be? They thought thats where the money came from and where the business community had gone.

But that wasnt satisfactory to a lot of base voters around the Republican Party, who were much angrier about social changes in the country and much more upset about immigration.

So I think the Republican Party was first hollowed out at the top, and then the tea party crystallized when Barack Obama was elected president and then it ended up being given further expression during the immigration reform battles and the rise of Donald Trump. I call it the bottom-up radicalization of the Republican Party, and I think it caught a lot of these Koch network darlings, including all three of these Young Guns, by surprise although in McCarthys case, I think he has done his best to ride the tiger. Hes tried to have it both ways.

Ward: Why do you think McCarthy was able to ride that tiger for longer than the other two?

Skocpol: Hes a shapeshifter, and thats given him staying power up until the moment he had Democratic votes to keep the government open and then went on TV over the weekend and trashed the Democrats.

The shape shifting is both a strength and a weakness. Its a strength in that, a little bit more effectively than Paul Ryan before him, hes been able to have it both ways to condemn Donald Trump and then embrace him, to say hes about cutting the deficit and hes about cracking down on the border. If the Republican Party really had wings and I dont think it does at this point he might have been able to bridge them. But by the end, he got to the point where nobody trusted him. I dont think anybody in the Republican Party trusted his word, and Democrats definitely couldnt.

Ward: Given the fact that McCarthy rose to power during the tea party moment, is there any sense in which his ouster represents a repudiation of the tea party legacy?

Skocpol: No it represents the culmination of it. I think most people in the in the media thought the tea party was about cutting the federal budget deficit because thats what a few elite spokesmen on TV said it was about. But our research always showed that at the grassroots, it was about popular anger over a changing country and fury at a Republican Party that was not responding to that desire. All the research that I and other political scientists have done on the movement shows that by the 2010s, just before Donald Trump emerges, the tea party had taken the shape of a just-say-no, blow-it-all-up, dont-cooperate, do-politics-on-Twitter faction and this is the perfect expression of it. This is where it leads. The fact that McCarthy and the other Young Guns were once called tea party people because they dallied with the movement does not mean that the tiger wasnt going to consume them in the end.

Ward: The conflict between the tea party and the Obama-era Republican Party reflected some real ideological differences between those two factions, especially on issues like immigration. Do you think the conflict between the far-right, anti-McCarthy wing of the party and McCarthys backers reflects a similarly robust ideological fissure? Or does it just boil down to rank obstructionism?

Skocpol: I think its post-ideological. One of the things that Trumps presidency accomplished was to give national expression to populist ethno-nationalism and anger at business as usual in Washington, D.C, and you get to a certain point where there arent many moderates at all in the Republican House caucus. There certainly are some people who are cross pressured because they come from Biden districts, but most of them have been enthusiastic supporters of the same kinds of issues that Matt Gaetz is speaking to. This is a disagreement over whether you should ever settle for less than 100 percent of what you want, even when youre in a position where you dont control more than one chamber.

Ward: So if the conflict is essentially about tactics and the real energies behind the far right are cultural, why do people like Gaetz still lean so heavily on the language of fiscal conservatism? After all, this most recent incident was partly set off by McCarthys unwillingness or inability to slash spending levels.

Skocpol: Youre not going to like the answer Im going to give you.

Ward: Try me.

Skocpol: It sells with the Washington press corps. Why anybody believes this is beyond me. Did you see what Donald Trump did when he was office? Did you see what Republicans did when they controlled the entire Congress? They dont cut anything, except taxes. And that keeps a certain number of billionaires and even Charles Koch himself happy.

There are two strands that have played out in the Republican Party during recent years. One of them I call McConnellism. McConnellism is clever. Its about using every lever of power to make sure Republicans get the federal judiciary full of judges who are going to disempower Democratic initiatives, and its about doing everything you can to shape the electorate, both by encouraging your own voters and discouraging the other guys voters. Its at the edge of whats legally and constitutionally legitimate. Then theres Trumpism, which at this point has gone from bullying and threatening to actual calls for violence. One of them is very powerful in the House, and the other is very powerful in the Senate.

But its a tactical difference. Its not as if theres a huge difference of policy. I think there might be some differences in policy over immigration, but those dont really come up because nobodys talking about legislating on immigration.

Ward: So what does all this mean for the future of the Republican Party? What are the ramifications of the argument that youre making that theres a fundamental continuity between the tea party movement and the MAGA movement?

Skocpol: Well, everything depends on whether Donald Trump is reelected president, and I dont think thats impossible. I really dont. As for the House of Representatives, I really do not know how theyre going to find a new Kevin McCarthy who can promise enough because the promises that are being demanded are impossible to fulfill.

Ward: Based on the traditional tea party playbook, though, what do you think the endgame here is for the far-right faction in the House?

Skocpol: Well, I think Matt Gaetz himself wants to get on TV, raise a lot of money and run for another office. Thats true of a number of the people who make up this very small group of people who were in a position to pull the hook on the grenade. But I dont think we know how this is going to come out. If youve got people in power who are backed by a large number of voters who are angry, fearful, limited in the information they get about whats going on and thinking that it would be better to blow America up than to save it I think youre in uncharted territory. We are in uncharted territory.

Read more here:
Kevin McCarthy's Downfall Is the Culmination of the Tea Party - POLITICO

Dress to impress at Frocktober Tea Party – Bundaberg Now

The community is invited to put the fun into fundraising at the Frocktober Tea Party at Childers Art Space as part of Seniors Month.

Community members are invited to serve up some looks alongside the cake and sandwiches at the Frocktober Tea Party at Childers Art Space on 12 October.

Now in its second year, Frocktober celebrates Seniors Month by encouraging visitors to enjoy a morning of friendship and fashion while helping to raise much needed funds for the Ovarian Cancer Research Foundation.

The event will take place in the gallery space and verandah overlooking historic Childers and tickets include a delicious morning tea as well as lucky door prizes, with raffle tickets also on sale.

All funds raised will be donated directly to the Ovarian Cancer Research Foundation.

Councils Arts, Culture and Events portfolio spokesperson Cr John Learmonth said the event was a great way for the community to connect while also raising awareness.

Frocktober was a great success last year and we are excited to be hosting it again as part of our Seniors Month line up, Cr Learmonth said.

This initiative serves as a wonderful way for residents to get out and have some fun while also supporting an important cause that affects so many women including those in our own community.

The third annual Queensland Seniors Month is currently underway, encouraging older residents to engage in social activities under the theme Connect Fest.

Alongside Council on the Ageing (COTA) Queensland, Bundaberg Regional Council has brought together a variety of activities to encourage community connectedness and honour the contributions made by senior residents.

For more information on the Seniors Month calendar, click here.

Frocktober Tea Party

When: 12 October, 10 am 12 pm

Where: Childers Art Space

Cost: $10, tickets available here.

Here is the original post:
Dress to impress at Frocktober Tea Party - Bundaberg Now

Opinion: Republicans plan to choose a new speaker with a party … – Chattanooga Times Free Press

John A. Boehner lasted five years as House speaker before he ran out of patience with his party's hard-line Freedom Caucus.

"Legislative terrorists," the Ohio Republican called its members after he quit in 2015. "They can't tell you what they're for. They can tell you everything they're against. They're anarchists. They want total chaos."

Next came Rep. Paul D. Ryan, R-Wis., who lasted three years. "The House is broken," he griped on his way out.

Rep. Kevin McCarthy, R-Calif., lasted all of nine months.

"They are not conservatives," he said of the Freedom Caucus after they led the drive to oust him as speaker last week. "They don't get to say they're conservative because they're angry and they're chaotic."

See a pattern?

Ever since the tea party movement of 2010 elected a wave of anti-establishment conservatives, House Republicans have not merely been divided, but downright dysfunctional.

Freedom

See the rest here:
Opinion: Republicans plan to choose a new speaker with a party ... - Chattanooga Times Free Press

The hardline ‘Nutjob Caucus’ holding Republican feet to the fire – Yahoo News

To supportersit is a conservative North Star -- that rare example of a political movement willing to put the little guy first and stand against corruption and waste in Washington.

To its detractors, the House Freedom Caucus is a far right, democracy-threatening cabal with a predilection for anarchy and nebulous aims beyond burning down the establishment.

Love it or loathe it, the renegade Republican faction is impossible to ignore. Just ask party leaders blaming its antics on Capitol Hill for a political deadlock that almost led this weekend to a damaging government shutdown.

Angered at the deal their party leader, House Speaker Kevin McCarthy, struck with Democrats late Saturday to prevent the shutdown, the group now intends to push for his ouster in the week ahead.

Birthed in the cauldron of ultra-conservative Tea Party politics in the Obama era, the invitation-only bloc launched in 2015 under the working title "The Reasonable Nutjob Caucus," according to founding member Mick Mulvaney.

The group of roughly 40 lawmakers -- it doesn't make its membership public -- accounts for just one-fifth of the House Republican conference.

But it wields outsize power as the party has a majority of just four seats, and it takes only a few lawmakers to throw the agenda of the House leadership into chaos.

Its members, moreover, tend to represent safe Republican seats, giving them the leeway to stir the kind of controversies that more precariously placed lawmakers would shy away from.

This gets them noticed on cable news, which in turn bolsters their online profiles, creating a feedback loop that keeps the fundraising dollars spinning.

Three of the bloc's most prominent members and allies-- Marjorie Taylor Greene, Matt Gaetz and Lauren Boebert -- are social media stars with a combined following on X, formerly known as Twitter, in excess of 10 million.

Whereas once they might have relied on the Republican National Committee or the Washington conservative establishment for help with fundraising, now they can appeal directly to their fans, giving them significant autonomy from the party whip.

- Rightward lurch -

This year alone, 19 Freedom Caucus members threatenedto sink McCarthy's bid for the speaker's gavel, and a handful forced a government debt crisis that almost led to a catastrophic US debt default.

The zealous pursuit by many of those same lawmakers of deep and unpopular spending cuts was behind this weekend's shutdown drama that would have disrupted the lives of millions of Americans.

Now they are furious with McCarthy for the stopgap compromise he made with Democrats to keep the government funded for another 45 days at current spending levels.

And McCarthy is vulnerable because, in order to secure the speaker's post, he had made a key concession to the caucus -- a rule allowing individual lawmakers to call a snap vote to remove him.

"I do intend to file a motion to vacate Speaker McCarthy this week," key caucus ally Gaetz told CNN on Sunday.

"I think we need to move on with new leadership that can be trustworthy," he said.

- Agent of chaos -

Latterly, the fringe group has inveigled itself into the upper echelons of the party, with founding member Jim Jordan becoming chairman of the powerful Judiciary Committee.

Jordan has been spearheading an impeachment investigation against President Joe Biden that has irritated mainstream colleagues, as witness after witness called by Republicans has undercut their narrative that the president is corrupt.

The Freedom Caucus is not immune from the schisms that beset every political grouping, with cracks emerging over alliances and tactics.

Membersvoted to boot out Greene, the far right Georgia flamethrower,in July for calling Boebert "a little bitch" during a caustic exchange on the House floor.

And Boebert herself reinforced the group's rabble-rousing image when she was thrown out of a performance of "Beetlejuice: The Musical" in Colorado in September after openly vaping and being disruptive at the family show.

Mulvaney argues, however, that some of the attention the group has received has been unfair and that its reputation as an agent of chaos is inaccurate.

"The Freedom Caucus has rules. Some are unwritten, but most exist in writing," he said in an op-ed for politics news outlet The Hill last week.

"I know because I wrote them."

ft/jh/bbk

See original here:
The hardline 'Nutjob Caucus' holding Republican feet to the fire - Yahoo News