Mediaboss Marketing

TAMPA The married couple stood on the sidewalk in front of the gleaming high rise, clutching pink posters as traffic zoomed by on West Kennedy Boulevard.

It was Valentine's Day, and Andrea Beley and Gaston Naranjo of Tampa had joined about 150 other demonstrators to send a message to U.S. Sen. Marco Rubio. This day, the group was largely focused on getting Rubio to hold a town hall meeting.

"I don't feel like I have a senator," said Beley, a 64-year-old retired university professor, as she held a holiday-inspired sign that read, "Rubio, Wherefore Art Thou?" "He seems like he's disappeared."

THE INDIVISIBLE GUIDE: Read the text of the how-to anti-Trump manual

The weekly demonstrations at Rubio's Tampa office are among the most visible signs of a national grassroots movement taking hold in Tampa Bay. The goal: Block President Donald Trump's agenda by pressuring members of Congress at home.

The activists are coalescing around the Indivisible Guide, a how-to manual written by ex-Democratic aides and modeled after the tactics that helped the tea party block President Barack Obama's agenda. It calls for putting a laser focus on representatives and senators in their districts by flooding town hall meetings, showing up at their offices and calling them out if they refuse to meet.

About two dozen groups in Hillsborough, Pinellas, Pasco and Hernando counties have registered on the Indivisible website in the last couple of months. Some are progressive groups that existed before Trump's election and have taken up the Indivisible tactics. Others formed in recent weeks under the Indivisible name.

They're using social media to connect and engage with every member of Congress, including Tampa Democrat Rep. Kathy Castor and Rep. Dennis Ross, a Republican who represents eastern Hillsborough County and served on Trump's transition team.

"I think we're at an important moment in American democracy," said Indivisible Tampa co-founder Michael Broache, a 32-year-old college professor who has never worked as an organizer before. "There's a troubling trend toward authoritarianism, and Congress is in place to act as a check and balance on the administration. We have an important role to play in reaching out to our elected officials and encouraging them to take that role seriously."

It started in a bar in Austin, Texas, a few days after Thanksgiving.

Ezra Levin, a former aide to Texas Democratic Rep. Lloyd Doggett, and his wife Leah Greenberg, a longtime aide to ex-Virginia Democratic Rep. Tom Perriello, were visiting family and lamenting the recent election results. By then, a resistance movement was already brewing and they wanted to help it along.

They created a Google document that would become the first draft of the Indivisible Guide, described as a set of "best practices for making Congress listen." The final version, posted at indivisible.com, is the product of input from about two dozen veteran Capitol Hill staffers and activists. Many of them saw firsthand how an ascendant tea party dogged their congressional representatives and emboldened the obstructionism.

"They implemented a basic but smart strategy, and they did it over and over again," said Levin, who lives in Washington, D.C.

"Trump is not popular," the guide states. "He does not have a mandate. He does not have large congressional majorities. If a small minority in the Tea Party could stop President Obama, then we the majority can stop a petty tyrant named Trump."

Groups that register must agree to three principles, Levin said: That Trump's agenda needs to be resisted; that at least part of a group's work will be carried out using strategies in the guide; and that it will endorse progressive, inclusive, non-violent values. The guide urges activists to be "polite but persistent."

Some 7,000 groups have registered on the website, including 300 in Florida, according to Levin. All but a small minority are newly formed groups. The rest, he said, are established civil rights and community activism groups.

The manual explains why the tactics will work: "MoCs want their constituents to think well of them, and they want good, local press. They hate surprises, wasted time, and most of all, bad press that makes them look weak, unlikable, and vulnerable. You will use these interests to make them listen and act."

This approach is making activist organizers out of people like David Higgins, a 35-year-old writer and editor for a marketing company who co-founded Indivisible St. Pete.

"It's not just signing petitions or marching in the streets," Higgins said. "It's direct, face-to-face, sustained engagement with your members of Congress. That's appealing because that's what we can do and that's how democracy works."

Higgins depends on the Affordable Care Act for insurance, and his wife Daina is a neuroscientist who cares deeply about funding for research.

"We're normal, everyday Floridians who are affected in very real ways by things that the federal government does, and we want to make sure our members of Congress know about and hear our voices, too, and not just professional lobbyists or corporations or big dollar donors," Higgins said.

Indivisible St. Pete had its first founders meeting a few weeks ago, and none of the five people there had been involved in activism before, Higgins said. The chapter now has about 475 members in its Facebook group.

They will be closely watching U.S. Rep. Charlie Crist, a Democrat and former Republican who has been all over the political map and beat Republican David Jolly in November for the District 13 seat that includes the southern half of Pinellas.

"He's relatively new to the Democratic party, so we're watching to see what that means to him," Higgins said.

Tampa's two Indivisible groups have an ally in Castor, who has criticized Trump policies such as the travel ban and the push to repeal the Affordable Care Act. But Levin, the Indivisible co-founder, said it's important to engage with progressive members, too, "to make them more bold and provide positive reinforcement to resist the Trump agenda."

Indivisible groups in Republican-dominated districts have bigger challenges ahead.

Ross, the Lakeland Republican, represents a swath of eastern Hillsborough that includes Brandon, portions of Riverview and Plant City. The former state lawmaker was sent to Washington in 2010 amid the tea party wave and has been an enthusiastic Trump supporter, speaking at two of his Florida rallies.

Ross will be a focus of Indivisible East Hillsborough, founded by Darlene Goodfellow. The 57-year-old Valrico real estate agent said she and her husband, who is self-employed, could be the "poster children" for the Affordable Care Act. Both have pre-exisiting medical conditions and worry about what will happen if the law is repealed a move Ross supports.

Until she formed the Indivisible group a few weeks ago, Goodfellow was a "keyboard warrior" who didn't attend political demonstrations, never mind organize them. But Trump spurred her to help rally progressives in a red district. Goodfellow has reached out to the Lakeland Indivisible group and plans to bring Hillsborough members to a town hall meeting Feb. 21 in Clermont.

"Taking down a congressman like Dennis Ross is a very high mountain to climb, but I still feel like it's a battle worth fighting," she said. "There are a lot of us out here. We've been too passive and haven't been organized, and that's what the Indivisible guide is all about, getting people together and making our voices heard."

A spokeswoman for Ross said he was unavailable for an interview last week.

Indivisible-inspired activism is beginning to make headlines.

It happened in New Port Richey this month when U.S. Rep. Gus Bilirakis hosted the second of two "listening sessions" on health care. The Palm Harbor Republican, who supports repealing and replacing the Affordable Care Act, arrived to an overflow crowd boosted by local Indivisible groups, carrying signs and lining up to voice their support for the health care law.

At least two national news networks showed clips of the crowd erupting into boos when a local GOP official raised the specter of ACA "death panels," a description that the Tampa Bay Times' PolitiFact declared its "lie of the year" in 2009.

In an interview last week, Bilirakis said he hadn't heard of the Indivisible movement until the town hall meetings. He said facing crowds who oppose his views gives him ideas to take back to Washington and won't discourage him from hosting future events.

"I have a duty to hear from my constituents, and they have a right to voice their opinion," Bilirakis said. "It's democracy in action."

Still to be determined is how much will these actions will really influence members such Bilirakis, Ross and fellow Tampa Bay area Republicans Dan Webster and Vern Buchanan, who have voiced support for Trump and represent comfortably Republican districts.

The answer depends largely on Trump, said James "Ed" Benton, a political science professor at the University of South Florida.

During the tea party wave of 2010, between the elections that put Barack Obama in the White House, Democrats lost 63 seats in Congress, Benton said. Republicans may see similar losses if dissatisfaction with Trump grows, he said.

"They could be a massive bloodletting in 2018 for Republicans who strongly support him if he continues on this path of seek and destroy," Benton said. "They may pay a price for his misdeeds," a prospect the Invisible movement is exploiting. "The message is, 'We're watching you, and we're going to hold you accountable if you don't hold the president accountable.'"

Sharon Calvert, founder of the Tampa Tea Party, said comparing Indivisible to the tea party is a flawed exercise.

While the tactics might be similar, the tea party was a more organic movement that grew outside the Republican party, while the current resistance movement is closely aligned with the Democratic party, Calvert said. She considers it too fixated on Trump and lacking in the focus that made the tea party successful.

"The tea party had a very succinct message about the bailouts, the stimulus package and Obamacare," she said. "What is their message? To maintain the status quo? To continue the policies that have been in place for the last eight years? If you have a different message every day, good luck."

In terms of sheer numbers and consistency, few members of Congress will feel the push of the Indivisible playbook more than Rubio.

Rubio sparred with Trump when they both ran for president, even calling him a "con man," but he later backed Trump and won reelection to his Senate seat. As a Republican senator, Rubio has the power to check Trump's agenda, but has gone along with it early in the term. He expressed concerns about Rex Tillerson, Trump's pick for secretary of state, but voted for the former Exxon executive anyway.

For weeks, activists have been flocking to demonstrate outside Rubio's offices in Orlando, Miami, Jacksonville, Palm Beach and Tampa. Their messages often align with issues in the news that day or week, so signs urge Rubio to vote down Trump's cabinet picks or call for an investigation into the administration's ties to Russia.

There has been some friction at Rubio's Tampa office, where the building management has put up barriers to keep anyone who doesn't have appointments with the senator's staff on the public sidewalk. At least two people have been banned from the building for refusing to leave.

In an email statement to the Tampa Bay Times, a Rubio spokeswoman said the Tampa location has two employees who serve multiple locations, "yet they have met with dozens of these liberal activists." The Rubio statement cited the Indivisible manual's strategy to raise specific issues on given days, dismissing the effort as "mass office calling."

"Their goal is to flood offices with calls and emails and then go to the press and claim they aren't getting a response," the statement said.

Some demonstrators said Rubio's staff has been more accommodating lately, taking comments and accepting appointments to meet with them. But that's not good enough for constituents who want face time with the senator. This week's congressional recess is a time when members of Congress typically hold events in back home but Rubio hasn't yet scheduled one.

At his Tampa office on Tuesday, demonstrators from as far away as Lakeland and Beverly Hills chanted "Town hall! Town hall!" and "This is what democracy looks like!"

The next day, Indivisible Tampa took a play from the guide's "Missing Members of Congress Action Plan" by scheduling their own town hall for Wednesday and posting the event on Facebook.

"Join fellow Tampa Bay constituents as our invited (yet unconfirmed) guest Senator Marco Rubio hears and responds to constituent questions, concerns and issues brought forth in a format of an organized Q&A style evening," the announcement said.

And if Rubio doesn't show up? The guide has some suggestions for that.

"Be prepared with a cardboard cutout or empty chair."

Contact Tony Marrero at tmarrero@tampabay.com or (813) 226-3374. Follow @tmarrerotimes.

Following tea party playbook, 'Indivisible' tries to nudge Congress away from Trump 02/18/17 [Last modified: Friday, February 17, 2017 2:29pm] Photo reprints | Article reprints

Go here to read the rest:
Following tea party playbook, 'Indivisible' tries to nudge Congress away from Trump - Tampabay.com (blog)

By Rich Lowry, San Antonio Express-News

Photo: LAUREN JUSTICE /NYT

Dems now following the tea party playbook

Its beginning to look a lot like August 2009 in reverse.

In that Summer of the Tea Party, conservative activists packed the town hall meetings of Democratic congressmen and peppered them with hostile questions. It was an early sign of the abiding opposition that Obamacare would encounter, and the prelude to Democratic defeats in 2010, 2014 and 2016.

Now, progressive activists are tearing a page from that playbook. The scenes are highly reminiscent of 2009, with Republican officeholders struggling to control unruly forums and leaving their town hall meetings early or not holding them in the first place.

The partisan temptation in this circumstance is always to dismiss the passion of the other side, which is what Democrats did to their detriment in 2009 and Republicans are doing now.

Its not often that White House Press Secretary Sean Spicer sounds like his predecessor Robert Gibbs, but on this, he might as well be reading leftover talking points. Gibbs dismissed the tea party town hall agitation eight years ago as manufactured anger reflecting the AstroTurf nature of grass-roots lobbying. Spicer says of the town hall protests, Its not these organic uprisings that weve seen through the last several decades the tea party was a very organic movementthis has become a very paid, AstroTturf-type movement.

What was true in 2009 is true today: In the normal course of things, its not easy even for a well-funded and well-organized group to get people to spend an evening at a school auditorium hooting at their congressman. If these demonstrations are happening in districts around the country, attention must be paid.

This is not to condone the more rancid elements of the lefts ferment (blocking Education Secretary Betsy DeVos from entering a Washington, D.C., school was petty thuggishness), nor is it to consider what is happening as nearly as significant as the tea party yet.

To become the lefts equivalent of the tea party, the protesters will have to persist despite the inevitable legislative defeats on the horizon; organize at the grass-roots level; play in Democratic primaries; make their own partys establishment miserable; and pick off a significant Republican seat in what seems like impossible territory the way Scott Brown did in the Massachusetts special election after the death of Ted Kennedy.

None of this is certain or necessarily likely. But Democrats deluded themselves in 2009 by disregarding the signs of fierce resistance to their agenda and paid the price. Republicans shouldnt make the same mistake.

There is nothing to suggest the lefts town-hall protestors represent anything like a majority of the country. Even an impassioned plurality can make a big impact, though. And if we have learned anything from the Obamacare debate, it is that disturbing the status quo in health care carries significant downside political risk. Democrats were in that position in 2009; Republicans are now.

The GOP cant and shouldnt back off its promise to repeal Obamacare. But the party should redouble its commitment to replace the law simultaneously with its repeal. At the prodding of President Donald Trump, congressional Republicans have been moving in this direction. It behooves the party to show its legislation wont lead to people losing their insurance and wont return to the pre-Obamacare status quo for people with pre-existing conditions.

With a consensus on replacement, Republicans would be much better equipped to push back at contentious town halls, and to potentially defuse some of the fear and anger engendered by their health care agenda. The alternative is to avoid town halls, and hope that after the repeal passes everything calms down. This was essentially the Democratic tack in 2009, and how did that work out?

comments.lowry@nationalreview.com

See original here:
Dems now following the tea party playbook - mySanAntonio.com

Fort Worth Star Telegram

The Trump effect: Are Texas Democrats now following Tea Party blueprint? Fort Worth Star Telegram President Donald Trump threatened to "destroy" the career of a Texas state senator in a meeting with sheriffs from around the country Tuesday. Sheriff Harold Eavenson of Rockwall County, Texas cited an unnamed state senator who backed a law making ... and more »

See the rest here:
The Trump effect: Are Texas Democrats now following Tea Party blueprint? - Fort Worth Star Telegram

A new liberal tea party? Really?

Donald Trumps presidency began with violent protests erupting on Inauguration Day, followed immediately by the Nasty Womens March Against Everything. Since then, Republican congressional town hall meetings across the country have experienced unprecedented massive disruptive protests. Media is quick to attribute this to the rising of a new grassroots liberal tea party movement.

I call that fake news.

Beyond the fact that about half the country was dismayed at the election results of 2008, 2012 and 2016, there is no similarity. Check the facts.

Who are these people? The tea party movement began as a real grassroots movement.

Citizen volunteers, upset with progressive policies and the direction of the country, banded together to make a positive difference and return the country to its constitutional center. They believe that liberty comes with personal responsibility. We are your neighbors, your family and friends, your co-workers. We may attend your church or synagogue. We come from many different walks in life: teachers, law enforcement, military, public service, small business, students, grandparents and parents.

Some are unemployed, some retired, but all care about their country.

The Alliance of Liberal Disrupters, as I like to call them, are orchestrated from the top. Much of the violence and mindless street protests we have seen receive funds through multiple groups sponsored by George Soros.

The Nasty Womens March, for example, received funding from 50 such Soros-funded organizations. The New York Post recently reported onOrganizing for Action: OFA, formerly Obama for America, has trained more than 10,000 leftist organizers, who in turn, are training more than 2 million youths in Alinsky street tactics, and they regularly hold organizing summits on college campuses. More funding and training comes through federally sponsored projects such as AmeriCorps, My Brothers Keeper and other nonprofit ACORN clones, who are being secretly bankrolled through Justice Department subprime settlement funds extracted from banks.

How do they differ?

Tea party groups encourage their members to first educate themselves on issues and the U.S. Constitution. They are encouraged to participate in governance at every level, in a constructive way working within the system, within the law. Many have run for office themselves. Their demonstrations are permitted, peaceful and respectful no violence, no looting or vandalism, no foul language. When the event is over, they leave the site as clean as it was before they arrived taking their signs with them.

On the other hand, the Alliance of Liberal Disrupters has no respect for our Constitution, our laws or law enforcement. They do not respect the rights and free speech of those who disagree with them. They accept no personal responsibility for their actions. Many cover their faces or wear masks as they protest and commit senseless violence and vandalism. They are anarchists, and intimidation and bullying are their hallmark.

While accusing conservatives of being fascists, it is these leftist groups that commit fascistactions themselves. Their goals can be summarized as overwhelm the system, disrupt, delay and destroy all that is America and replace it with chaos, anarchy and some sort of totalitarian control yet to be determined. Their minions are what communists would call useful idiots.

Where do you stand?

America has elected a new president who committed to restore the rule of law in our country, to secure our borders, to reduce burdensome bureaucratic regulations and to make America great again for all Americans. Are you going to stand by and watch this Alliance of Liberal Disrupters rule the day, overwhelm the system and destroy America, or are you willing to give him a chance, work together to make America great again?

Colleen Britton is a Vacaville resident and member of The Solano County Citizen/Taxpayer Group. Reach her by email at [emailprotected].

Original post:
No such thing as liberal tea party - Fairfield Daily Republic

BULLHEAD CITY Mohave County District 5 Sup. Steve Moss, R-Fort Mohave, said his main concerns at the moment are county roads and the state of law enforcement. Moss was the guest speaker at a recent Colorado River Tea Party Patriots meeting.

Moss, whose district includes Fort Mohave, Mohave Valley, Golden Shores and part of Lake Havasu City, described the Board of Supervisors as a countywide city council, controlling unincorporated areas including Fort Mohave and Mohave Valley.

Moss said the county needs $17 million to fix and maintain roads, and is coming up $5 million short, receiving about

$12 million in state Highway User Revenue funds, collected from the states gas tax. He said county Public Works is experimenting with different kinds of materials to pave roads, in order to save money. Roads in the worst shape are getting the most attention, Moss said.

Regarding the Mohave County Sheriffs Office, there are 78 sworn deputies when the county really needs 115, he said.

Recruiting new deputies is easy, but keeping them is a problem, Moss said, since they get hired away by neighboring police departments for higher wages.

Moss said the county has not raised its property tax in the past five years and there are no plans to raise it this year.

I cant say the same about the sales tax, he said, noting that a vote by the board to raise the tax must be unanimous.

Moss said only 17 percent of the property tax the county collects actually goes to the county, with the biggest amounts going to school and fire districts.

He said the people in the room at the Tea Party meeting could take over any school or fire board by getting three members elected to a given board.

Moss, who has won two elections to the Board of Supervisors, and several elections as a school board member, said Winning elections is not that difficult.

Moss, who delivered an animated presentation, received many questions and lots of feedback from audience members.

Originally posted here:
Moss outlines county's funding challenges to local tea party activists - Mohave Valley News