Archive for the ‘Tea Party’ Category

The Left Needs Its Own Tea Party – The Texas Observer

Christopher Hooks

Many progressives remember the tea party revolution of 2009-2010 as an extended exercise in unreason. Thats not wrong. But it was also, quite possibly, the most successful political organizing movement in the last half-century of American politics. The tea party transformed the GOP from a broken and battered political party to a ruthlessly effective organ in the body politic all in the space of about 18 months. As Democrats plot a path out of the wilderness, its important to consider how the right did it.

In those years, the tea party was full of scorn for Barack Obamas background as a organizer, and the feared name of Saul Alinsky was never far from conservative activists lips. But these right-wing rabble-rousers were much better organizers. For decades, the American left has dreamed about building a national movement of self-organizing cells by unifying political neophytes with disparate beliefs into a single, broad cause, and operating both within and outside its host political party. Conservatives realized that model. It worked. And Democrats still have nothing like it.

In Texas, there were tea party groups at the county, city and even neighborhood level. They were hyperlocal organizing engines whose events also offered camaraderie. They often met in churches, and many were involved with their own politically active congregations.

By creating a circuit where politicians such as Ted Cruz and Dan Patrick could speak directly to conservative activists, tea party groups changed the future of the state simply by existing. It became more important to tailor messages and political activity to these small crowds. The network was also an excellent way to train activists in more complex forms of organizing, such as block-walking and voter outreach, and a way for big conservative groups to reach local folks. It was all stunningly successful.

Democrats are supposed to be the party of the collective, but Democratic politics is intensely atomized, and many of its would-be voters are alienated from politics. Unions are capable of creating some energy, which is one reason theyve been so intensely targeted by the GOP. Same with groups like ACORN. But theyve all been decimated.

The social function of tea party groups was just as important as their organizing ability. Its in linking and threading social groups together that politics can become a part of a persons life, as it is in many other countries, instead of something to be argued about online. Its here where Democrats truly have nothing. In part, thats because there is no broader goal at the moment. Democrats have no fleshed-out answer to the exceptionally effective motivating ideologies of the tea party, no worldview that constitutes a cause.

Theres been ample and often deserved criticism of Obama for letting his own grassroots vehicle, Organizing for America, molder, and of the Democratic Party for losing sight of precinct-level activity. But the tea party wasnt the invention of the GOP. It couldnt be. Activists did it themselves.

Jen Reel

Ive often wondered if the key difference here is cognitive maybe conservatives, who value tradition, hierarchy and in-group identities, are simply better at this than centrists, who care about little but the status quo, and the left, inherently wary of power and each other. The 2016 Democratic primary changed my mind, partly. Theres evidently a tremendous hunger on the left, particularly among young people, to take part in something politically meaningful.

One organizing group, the Democratic Socialists of America (DSA), has seen its dues-paying membership quintuple since the start of Bernie Sanders campaign. Theyve seen growth in unlikely places like El Paso. Their chapters offer the social experience of the tea party, as well as focusing energy on local races, such as precinct chairmanships and community college trusteeships. But DSA is tiny, and the left needs a mass movement.

Many in the Democratic Party innately distrust this kind of talk. Some hated or distrusted Sanders. They hold essentially centrist policy beliefs, and find ideological talk icky. Their fear is misguided. The party needs all of the energy it can generate, and many different approaches can exist simultaneously. The belief that Donald Trumps party is too stupid or evil and will necessarily self-destruct is terrifically dangerous and must be quashed. (Texas Democrats have been using that line on each other since I was in elementary school.) The Trump era is something new in American politics, and only a new approach can counter it. The clock is ticking.

This article appears in the February 2017 issue of the Texas Observer. Read more from the issue or subscribe now.

Excerpt from:
The Left Needs Its Own Tea Party - The Texas Observer

This ‘Resistance’ Is No Tea Party – Wall Street Journal

This 'Resistance' Is No Tea Party
Wall Street Journal
Democrats don't like to think about Republicans if they can help it. But for those on the left now contemplating their own progressive tea party movement, they'd do well to contemplate one woman in particular: Christine O'Donnell. In 2010 Republicans ...

and more »

Originally posted here:
This 'Resistance' Is No Tea Party - Wall Street Journal

Having a tea party, fundraising to fight pediatric cancer all in a day’s work for Eli Manning – Metro.us

rG(l~EIPI"mID@PV#OhFUYUYYYYY/~fg/;LTklG+&lcvvngnfEI2$/4EIryzols:}_@79lU@MSGw[:WGxjb9l@& ([|Hv*?.v`jzwXt}63]u2ij[9nX&Um!N:/JiXVZi+KWJi*rV+c{]qK@gkE.pjReE>@u?r}~csKX namkC2b#1`}vG^X,SwlI UuA[sg1Qs}{ko4WnnnoG|u|Zl(RT}{.}]i!QR `]3| `Cf}${ _BWS=0/-X0Xt-;wkv L_!v9@bc1w jwwlL1d$bmB,gTcW g0nNVT/e;eeYlJ@L+oj+Z%LIdR5a%z&v`L)HW"sFhEx@,FQLxq4+4JbQhh1 LbP]ro4]Q]~e{?X_S&&wtzw!MV.zb8zVtAGM575)@+[35 V+'is(SEM"srRBB2N,Uu5^?T2XCbAg] 5|, ^qg'>ZEvz_Lj*,>E};AVXPXt["_B~*WKZ)-@H!6 2;u].;/me9tq:}ewEo$o(/T.g {Q o6MEok.<^B~b('XF"+ V"[^_c)"$x0lJ~ ~#W|Xn"Hp_b_31.~."b"v anVB:,K`]xYDx.;!~5"0?mCS_Weo#8,60}F2Q#]]9_`:lqVee^A[L>nJA?92^g:^$nIROA`UwFTKlcJ.98{H-D Z-._XD=,L4x!E(rk8 dK@=s"^] /k^9]p"xKO-*N#&l1.2]!!FV+=5_rg~gXu vkR>R'e7Pg@gr(WG;|- -:w(?P2qB,~M&'Xp>lqd+*r='a[QT@[<,!;Q<@U}L PVR}g8 J(0a| odW2l5Ydo|l<(7V&8f[D@S|"7n,TT |%|RJZ+[mjR"56eT2]jJA^ H"]`S,6nK*0]bUI)Wc28S3u:`@; .1@wS!8( >wjE_UoPsh%|oYX!eNQm+.Aqdp@4 SvH5NQD4k;frectlT7A*tb_^*eUcX~6=A~-TWSRk_(wfZt<)K9Itt=U2"cOOI+9*p9GK2,oD d%+(EP/ P^v q2/ajLS:(: .tp%W#Nn~PxZvL /v@g8/roc0V(t9e4R5Ptu@ZLi%xkmSh%eP`9plXw< eo);=>c/R=|UUWC>N5f9MM[D57h"~&s-*, 16q([q`MTQag>$FJHW*U!$Yj h GCjNHd]&A4&qWhj5B1-DV}hBR7m$p}eB ?'2mgwtO-:k;H ]]&m<>uF9FZf3(X#?TU%LU~fI,@I, jT=F;qgIlp2'r# Xz1v2Bq*lU }JGLuC;O3Q8%J*BWD t(Mk~5dO tTi~_%|bK u

df}3I1)#4H"~1ji,@(.$LjRlE?-`t,'Bs]5/f;M`).a-l5gw}6R=,F!SW-:irvKrd2`}#(mr4 E5=-F1c~mt18#^?mx[d?qw5o`r>:P@]/>oB5]lHH8U3`.2gymuE qt; Gbbr"d]BoV$T`nA(PMrXy'BBpz=H@p d,I81v 8%c$:2|zD0(Yxiy/x CQyb)lgD^9$9okD0*|_CVa;2t"h[fabALc )#rbZUC]q`8y=6nld2g?Ye000l ;R]6qN-x(b rk 8+ pY@4`vq,{@"1`l41z }2BXV!0tRfu>A,R6CvK8zw_d'.v(7Gr]4JPOga0Sht<rl A}m v`qm r OAAOsXJIFY l8Hl%RIv,sx-~8!!$VC`nOUN.px9!pI0Tc8kB%QS{#4G9dvz{jq@7ab!;GNKvXT/c .B<=3>%N1Sq"383*RD.DeH":NVA3C,Ws$RRRSMPm3BTL9AY<5} %U1$."='eFJ^S.V $C(,,(Ub=rdCSzdFD,6h7sh|FnF9Rxl`?.~ AQ Iq1[3t'Oo1%g>2QqrsYa%L Qx}Lhj(Jyw2TzK$vV 7Lue(SSHP(q.Tih }`~V_y[00X.#4]# m@"2p vTDl2eX}1^ckia]dKw5T^omle(I Sz'Lr-`2eg4f$N@-YGi0 I>:PQ8(QPHD U.:6`zzi#mP;I'W @yf~PE2a aKMftuR>17@:m9v4ryYN(bWF[4ji `4"lA#] dnAG=M34Dz*l(;x0^cX,*OW'5SZ:#t t`JZVI~CsS{tn<"k` `X4 "6%FneA/Q2^YfE*0<'[tK"f<^ZzuwSn5H N&.bkOD|#H3HMDH4EkTInAg]*k!)xD`Jt.$:Be 5A;xVM$_+0UIma*|K*yG:7^wo+xHQHp|zs2W[(Sj3lp1UU6&O_g6^a3c{ow^|`o_w'7w}:{ `]YoT6nuoV5mw+u{v]n>cKt8Y=}~r!S|@L`p ?+2@J5S<`z(+1%F yP8:%gp4lsw&2\4S/@?1LO'7%!W=kW58a4NL)Xf_;uh`0Jkxjg|qNI4f3i{%!,O7AAa:kGcTp"D1^2(`.pmsk5h~muEEg #2ctC3%:g{^lP UikG}D2Ufy=bf7Q:(2%p&XpAn,7N!=c'zI,w< N=G'2&{F{.e=OAC_{.*2 'YbMx**0G<$OWy!v86SyXbfycCc$1$8}'']s 0t9a7JJ@L>F?DU"O'<-q%&t6qpiwO4ymp@um-aecybQS-vYK86=6~0a;L7M~@v2Ovc.5FT-x/ ]a+1dq8UG 'WvwA6Gtag,Gt>OThB_2*l&.sH__1#'>R?B'hQ$dg{n$*U1mJq"q 5ltDoM?}qaSn(){IAT8LFA/o{sGch|/z.W`abKam]GAQLlU[{N 5tcig0,#]2YtS[nLEU'a$wDB^e@ak0!YSRJl*a[2&}CX-~.T8{=vztjJ uBuKq$=xUVN|MuWv niC;]VJ59'P+dROu'H[A)Z*9G"A`*3Wk .0{NINBS8mHYE5ZPpfK=Z3| bJ.9 'I>av/YnB@[++|a|i0E{hS;=mt;gy6t: TEDxAp9(;DH?pn{_6#3XaDaOa8^F^1Ix)pXNwa7V~;j8Zm>j{7ekZ ZGm?::$0Gs;x/~|_FgD>k0!&zBo#W))w55&) NvyzE=n[XA;0YK,2a&`zpG /'=;?S)Ka_Q/g:':+4wH/ rZEMNX*UV[S:N[{ H;T}cUTsntGmmz)l4T7En=X5Qg)-fe=`,xvZil JD 2'CNNP&)xecL ;e,$dElWFNOD~S)2&n>yWnO~!+j) ta2 RmT@(Tgs|evoUW^knj:[F~tm(}N?^{-u! h"`ua:' ci.5w3U^}yT9L9NwM9[j4SZ3;O3,47o-U1q_<T#N-M-O|")6XhBQSShiHW_wq]/%+;?=Gj-^7Yepkg&,Gm6 C29MACYLmmQXTdy:+((_`]T?5@@jy*j5)x}tz nAj]{U!SPG8g:7|qy o}]kx273yW+t]Q~(b@.L *XA: &:x:^f$u0m9VKxBq`wC#nLEb(,X@;)H5|p{BF>XR7/ Nu}3QcxE+#7AnD;7w!FK ws|{M7,G9|@GC>41O5Qx3gb-*&Ee6v7ivYt6%`yT c|@2Kjes`8:Fq:%[5_=WB>_(LeeL=jJM4 S*1 `Zzqywk}!vn!]Ck0s7wx+55x!Hcl2O &G`a ]o];uAua 0ELQ@SPpG7 ">S@g&6eQ(-[pZeUV*&.%O`tWjus/uMI_'MB ZIuSn]~/OcgDRN:Lk2l??.nKn_2]2fZT-o~1=$w8PD|j"p1 8X)>of//8LytyY17Az>k^7/tIMQtN)b* ts/U 5naUW<..33[yi.a]yK$%}R._U{U|:VcbK:*[c*;(V((@q(>sP<_`v^cx 0~Zg``BpEpcFp 7 {o.21F x {5cz!-LTVPIL~e u7RiCyG=1@/3>bjy(i9Eo~9**oT+-0l[FhGR--,UopWV`F"uHSZ Fk=J)@XNBxD4iiAK~j1(X4*MQohG2NW#OD,!E% Nw&.$iId sC7`o6O:YI6"9f:QX q$x+u#p1"[FQ?2DDWdC,%#$WDQuo[{+Nys.r$("4>2EHak2Y$d3)|w`-:Y#=2(8tLJ$;>]#bhNEXHnjKX,S"BDv1nk1;BWtjHwytx{hO-|tw/.JQw {@gusYPt(@JhR-2 R2M=6haHWr{$iU3R'Q4q")7zT YnTT.7qoQStq";`G=wu5uqm|21Ps_]zxxd[srLlP=hT&Die.&F3vRM~4Oz*x+}&w&dJ_Wf (]F uf5zJMt3.Fy5Y 3EufXYJD@+of]7Y$"L+2*dwx.Tx/ J"7j/SA F/>:sKOz^*kD6WeqRwwww7]zWmU W6+#4Ym=``M{L8061_E?IQ_fW]+Z0 @&lF0$VI=|b+h}&5n.*6Fv"y}jzU,KnwQe_[^./!~Ur-.FWUGWx5O .O&FT?+Ll,`VCT=q:Nb<@x:4/.'!gqV``a wnwr /KY-?LBmavllwXnh/U-<3U0 .^6r})Kt["^tA`[`#} a3$lYfZUvEzU1lwb"(^S,e}X*: vAy#*C7fR-e6s;qx}RuqjccL >S{x5K_tx]yJ8zZ1#`SZ}"{y$;"_(",xdKZB,? Xl+08yVZ)olfe7je`Zz7=Rh)SGBf{wF3x)^W ;,Wn"DLE+Hnlz!ued{!e,gwIOeZ`8D^-gl6sSWFc`_WSH5ZrqMS0Pl^3W7'T3wM5e',|Az0IIoW4KX^+=S&:`I9dl)WciL^b)J"L t@2{C=foPnONOtO)aINgXZioH"rN ?qIbR-K9 nnEDS^|sa&0$29-HyV0(jeH);>s;+M"b+[MnYFVwET!Hmm.'b"+_= {X_6H03.hEVByaNvJMD1]3okUkssQ&EK#yb (`2.O"d $>~"1OB04NF"&%(K`Xi~3SKC |0'F^u.tIMn`nU*z__ol7oU^85x 1c2WCl0)lt[qetR2 x8aA9W~0!^^_*jnlsWoV5VDe1m:Z9!;~Cq@dq@~%N";(*^VT}]#i>UCD/tfG~?$g0s+c_Nyly@3M_yw!z=x_"X/|R7G6tergEeCyW+ D9d @p3A>$@BmY+[6B ,qlm"1q56B+R3$rfq1PA1A]Q~ ,5z-=}'?|gqQqp%L/,W&]wv0" sk_GO|&66 ENNEF{t8T#Nk:TeILUf$qfLq?z$Cg>|u&|&~][]r=d~[ LV/tkvRmln,d8h5@)dz|_ 6OU9/3

Originally posted here:
Having a tea party, fundraising to fight pediatric cancer all in a day's work for Eli Manning - Metro.us

Democrats Consider Whether To Take A Page From The Tea Party’s Playbook – BuzzFeed News

Demonstrators protest on the National Mall in Washington, DC, for the Womens march on January 21, 2017. Andrew Caballero-reynolds / AFP / Getty Images

ID: 10455269

WASHINGTON Since President Donald Trumps election, massive protests have sprung up around the country and factions of the Democratic party have demanded that elected officials obstruct any and all of the presidents nominees and policies.

If that sounds familiar, its because the story resembles that of how the tea party came to be, loathe though Democrats may be to admit it. And while they bristle at the comparison, the similarities are striking enough that some members of the party say they could stand to take a page out of the tea partys playbook.

Especially appealing is the tea partys bottom-up approach to organizing and challenging the status quo, leading some Democrats to push for a renewed grassroots effort within the party one that appears to be occurring organically and, potentially changes in leadership.

Most notably, one progressive group is threatening to primary more establishment Democrats, a move used with great effect by tea party groups for years. Adam Green, co-founder of the Progressive Change Campaign Committee, said that is what the public can expect to see from progressives in future elections.

Its time for progressives and the grassroots to take matters into our own hands and craft the winning strategy, Green said, adding that progressives will not hesitate to make an example of some establishment Democrats particularly those facing reelection in red states, who may be incentivized to vote with the Trump administration on some issues.

There are others on the same page.

There is a growing divide in the party between those who want to echo the tea party by aggressively opposing Republicans proposals in order to capitalize on the obvious energy among liberals in the wake of Trumps inauguration and those who want to work with Republicans where they can to avoid bringing government to a screeching halt. The latter group fears earning the obstructionist label theyve often pinned on the tea party.

But for years the party has been consistently losing ground on the local, state and federal levels, and some Democrats say enough is enough.

What the tea party did to its credit is they organized. They went and got involved in school board elections, local select board elections, mayoral elections, so they organized at the local level, and that energy helped them win some successes a few years ago at the congressional and even senate level, Vermont Rep. Peter Welch told BuzzFeed News. Thats essential for us in the Democratic party to get back to our roots.

Others, including those in Democratic leadership, argue that their policies are in fact winning, pointing to Hillary Clintons popular vote victory as proof. The policies that we have promoted and pursued were supported by more Americans in this last election than supported Donald Trump. Period, House Minority Whip Steny Hoyer said. Sowe dont have to be concerned our policies did not enjoy the majority support.

If substantial party changes do not end up coming from the top down, there are signs that it will still come from within. Rep. Ruben Gallego told BuzzFeed News that he expects and hopes there will be more aggression from Democrats on policy moving forward, marrying everyday government functions to the partys election strategy.

We do not, as Democrats, receive any credit for half-measures. And I think the half-measures that weve done on policies for the last eight years for President Obamas tenure hasnt been rewarded politically. So doing a middle-of-the-road for the sake of doing middle-of-the-road legislation and policy is not recognized and does not end up being politically fruitful, Gallego told BuzzFeed News.

In no way should we be participating in anything that is just for the sake of for us to say that we are bipartisan. Those days are done.

South Carolina state Senator Vincent Sheheen, who ran his first failed bid for governor in 2010 against Nikki Haley, argued that now that Democrats have lost the White House, the inner rot of the party is more evident.

I think that nationally the party is disconnected from real America, and I dont think nationally the leadership has learned, and if it had, it would have changed, Sheheen said. Its an opportunity for the party to change now that the presidency is controlled by Republicans because before the problem for the party was really masked or hidden by the fact that a Democrat was the president.

Sheheen added that he thinks there is room for Democrats to learn from the tea party movement, particularly the idea that voters lose faith when the same people continue to be in charge.

Following the 2016 election, the top Democrats in Congress are now essentially the same: Sen. Chuck Schumer from New York and California Rep. Nancy Pelosi. Pelosi has been the top House Democrat since 2002 and Schumer, new to his position as Senate Minority Leader, has also long held leadership roles within the party. He was third in Senate leadership until the last Democratic leader, Harry Reid, retired at the end of 2016.

While Democrats have given progressive Sen. Bernie Sanders a seat at the table and opened up leadership opportunities in the House for some of the less-experienced politicians, only the chairmanship of Democratic National Committee, which is up for grabs, remains a seat where the party could see drastic change in leadership.

Even if Democratic elected officials are resistant to change, they may still be pulled further to the left by their base and peripheral organizations like PCCC in the vein of the ones the tea party used to fund and promote its brand.

Like many tea party groups early on in the movement, the PCCC has earned the ire of Washington Democrats, who often dismiss it as a loud voice thats too focused on causing a fuss and raising money than actually succeeding in shifting policy or electing Democrats.

PCCCs Green pointed to the Virginia gubernatorial primary later this year as a high-profile test. Former Rep. Tom Perriello, a one-term congressman, is running a populist campaign against a better-established opponent, Lt. Gov. Ralph Northam, who has the backing of current Gov. Terry McAuliffe and both of the states senators. The primary will take place in June.

Thats going to become a proxy battle versus the Democratic establishment and the new emboldened progressive movement within the Democratic party, Green said.

Green also put Democrats in red states on notice, saying that those with upcoming re-elections stand to lose if they do not vote against Trumps agenda and nominees.

Blue state Democrats may not escape the PCCCs ire either. The group put out a statement criticizing Delaware Sen. Chris Coons for saying that Trumps Supreme Court nominee should get a hearing and a vote in the Senate, calling on Democrats to call his office and let Coons know this is NOT what Democratic backbone needs to look like.

The PCCC did not respond to multiple requests for comment, however, on if theyd do the same to Massachusetts Sen. Elizabeth Warren, whom the group has labeled their North Star in the past. Warren has been criticized by liberals on social media for voting for another Trump nominee Ben Carson to head the Department of Housing and Urban Development.

House Democratic Leader Nancy Pelosi insists there is not a division within the party between establishment Democrats who want to play ball with Republicans where they can and progressives who want push further to the left.

Obviously we pledged to the American people a responsibility to find common ground with the Republicans as we did with President Bush, Pelosi said at a press conference, adding that Democrats stand ready to do so with Republicans. When we dont find common ground, well stand our ground. On the Affordable Care Act, we are standing our ground. But theres no division, no.

For very different reasons, like President Obama did for the tea party, President Trump has given liberals a cause to unite against. Democrats rush to point to the Womens March on Washington, one of the largest protests in DCs history, as a sign that their voters have been set in motion. Since the march, protesters have continued to gather across the country to rail against Trump and his administration.

House Democrats will continue to discuss how we can harness the energy we saw on Saturday, and we are unified in representing the plurality of Americans who did not vote for Donald Trump and his agenda, Hoyer said in a statement to BuzzFeed News after the march took place.

Even before the inauguration and the march, constituents have been showing up to representatives district offices and events to protest the repeal of the Affordable Care Act.

Tyler Law, spokesman for the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee, said in a statement to BuzzFeed News that they are working to harness and sustain that energy ahead of the 2018 elections.

The DCCC is focused on engaging voters on the importance of the midterms, so that we get people to channel their energy and organizing abilities towards wins at the ballot box in 2018, Law said.

The Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee did not respond to a request for comment.

Were not going to oppose something just because the name Trump is on it, Schumer said in a statement to BuzzFeed News. But when he proposes things that are against our values and there are many different issues where that will be the case then we will oppose him tooth and nail.

Many Democrats are game to stick to that strategy, in part because they fear the outcome of what a full-blown tea party movement of the left would bring.

There is a strong temptation to take exactly the same path. But I would submit to you that that path got us to Donald Trump, Texas Rep. Joaquin Castro said in a BuzzFeed Brews interview. I believe that we should resist his bad policies, we should strongly resist them, but whatever course we take, we cant end up with a counterpart on the left like him.

Go here to read the rest:
Democrats Consider Whether To Take A Page From The Tea Party's Playbook - BuzzFeed News

Rachel Maddow Drops Truth Bomb on the Right: Trump Resistance … – AlterNet

Photo Credit: YouTube/MSNBC

The anti-Trump resistance movement stretches far beyond major cities, or even states Trump lost. It's also nearly twice as popular as its right-wing counterpart.

"Take a look at the shot from Mount Desert Island in Maine," MSNBC host Rachel Maddow pointed out, showing a photo of a newly formed "indivisible" activist group gathered for a meeting earlier this week.

"55 people here at the first meeting of MDI Indivisible. Not bad for a town of 5,000," tweetedthe photographer, Jennifer S Booher.

"You see the hats that they're wearing? Those are little statue liberty crowns," Maddow noted. They were, incidentally, the same hats worn by Tea Party membersa trend set by high-profile members like Virginia "Ginny" Thomas.

"I remember back in 2010 at the start of the Tea Party movement that sprung up on the right to oppose President Obama... when we discovered that one of the high-profile organizers of that effort was the wife of a sitting Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas' wife, Ginny Thomas. [Ginny] was a Tea Party activist and in a very involved way; she founded something called Liberty Central."

Liberty Central was a conservative activist group founded in 2009 with over half a million dollars from undisclosed donors.

"They tried to get all the Tea Party people to wear these Statue of Liberty foam crowns [and] around the time that Clarence Thomas' wife Ginny was raising money from undisclosed donors for the Tea Party movement by selling those foam crowns... the Washington Post did a national poll asking Americans whether or not they had ever heard about this Tea Party movement that was taking shape."

That was in October 2010, when 54 percent of Americans were aware of the Tea Party.

"That compares roughly with the percentage of Americans right now who say they've heard about those women's marches that took place in protest of the new president, Donald Trump (57 percent)," Maddow pointed out.

"However, at the height of the Tea Party's power, the proportion of Americans who said they supported or leaned toward supporting the Tea Party was 39 percent. Right now the number of Americans who say they support or lean toward supporting the women's marches is sixty percent," the host added.

The Washington Post poll was taken in 2010, one month before the midterm elections of November 2010 when Republicans captured the House. It was a major turning point for the right, but also the decline of their movement.

"Americans, broadly speaking, are equally aware of those two movements," Maddow hammered. "A big solid majority of America approves of the women's marches that happened in protest of Donald Trump, and they are supported by Americans at a rate that outstrips support for the Tea Party at its apex by more than 20 points."

Watch:

Alexandra Rosenmann is an AlterNet associate editor. Follow her@alexpreditor.

See more here:
Rachel Maddow Drops Truth Bomb on the Right: Trump Resistance ... - AlterNet