Mediaboss Marketing

Locals can drink tea with the cast of the Aiken Civic Ballet's next production during the "Mad Hatter Tea Party" this weekend.

The Aiken Civic Ballet will present "Alice in Wonderland" this spring.

Guests to the tea party will not only get to meet cast members but will also be able to get photos taken with them.

Tea refreshments will be served, and attendants will be able to make a craft.

The tea party will be at Pitter Patter Children's Boutique, 151 Laurens St. S.W., on Sunday at 1:30 and 3 p.m.

Admission is $10, and reservations are recommended as space is limited.

For more information or to reserve a spot, call 803-643-8000.

The Aiken Civic Ballet's production of "Alice" will be April 15 at 1 and 7 p.m. at USC Aiken's Etherredge Center, 471 University Parkway.

Tickets will be available online starting March 15.

For more information, visit http://www.aikenballet.org.

Stephanie Turner is the features reporter with the Aiken Standard, where she covers health topics, the arts, authors and restaurants. She graduated from Valdosta State University in 2012.

Continue reading here:
Meet 'Alice in Wonderland' cast at tea party Sunday - Aiken Standard

Western Nevada County residents shocked and distressed over the election of Donald Trump have been frustrated by an inability to show their anger, mainly because Rep. Doug LaMalfa hasn't held any town meetings that would give them an excuse to let loose.

But LaMalfa gave local lefties a chance to join in the national protests by scheduling an appearance Feb. 24 at a meeting of an outfit hardly anybody outside the industry knows about, the Mountain Counties Water Resources Association.

LaMalfa was joined by Rep. Tom McClintock, a survivor of two recent raucous town hall meetings, and some elected Republicans farther down the food chain to discuss the "The New Trump Administration A view from the Top." Even state Senator Ted Gaines, who rarely makes an appearance in this neck of the woods, attended the Auburn event.

The demand for tickets exceeded anything association executive director John Kingsbury had ever experienced before. "Normally, we don't have anybody register," he told The Union. Apparently suspicious that the newcomers were more interested in making a political statement than delving into the intricacies of water policy, Kingsbury refunded the $40 price of admission to non-members of the organization.

That prompted protests from the likes of Nevada City Council member Reinette Senum, Caleb Dardick, executive director of SYRCL, the Nevada City Rancheria Tribal Council, and various outfits that apparently don't understand the meaning of the word "indivisible."

That didn't stop them and several hundred others from showing up at the semi-posh Ridge Golf Course and Events Center to voice their concern over water policy, the fate of Obamacare, and various other issues that are vexing people who didn't vote for Trump.

Many Republicans including Trump dismiss the demonstrations as the work of professional organizers and paid activists, partly because MoveOn, Organizing for Action, Planned Parenthood, and other liberal groups have offered help.

Several state and national groups are working to connect these activists online. They publicize meetings and events, and host online seminars on ways to influence members of congress. Many are first-timers who echo in passion, though not politics, the people who emerged early in the Tea Party movement in 2009. Some wags have referred to the protests as the Herbal Tea Party movement.

Conservatives who dismiss the movement as a nefarious plot bankrolled by George Soros conveniently forget how well organized the "spontaneous" Tea Party demonstrations were. They were guided in part by a Tea Party Patriots memo encouraging people attending town meetings to scream loudly, be disruptive and make clear that a significant portion of the audience did not support the congressman's agenda.

"Every few minutes, people at the end of every few rows of seats would spring to their feet, then turn to rows immediately behind them and urge others to stand like orchestrating a wave at a baseball game," recalled Steve Israel, then a Democratic congressman from Long Island, N.Y. "It was the first time I witnessed syncopated booing."

While lefties are by definition disorganized (see Will Rogers), the Nevada County Democratic Party Central Committee offered some suggestions on how to organize and carry out the Auburn demonstration. Among the nuggets of advice offered:

Protest signs: "ResistanceUS has called the event 'Stand Up to Climate Deniers LaMalfa and McClintock'," so it was recommended that water-themed signs be created;

Fashion statement: Wear blue so the group is easy to recognize and can project solidarity. "We are discouraging the color pink. If we look like a whole new group of people, the press can't dismiss us as 'those crazy women.' Don't be afraid to add red and white accents;"

"Be orderly, be polite Folks should arrive with empty bladders in the morning."

Participants estimated 500 demonstrators showed up, but it didn't seem to sway the opinions of Republican officials who addressed water agency officials. Generally they called for more dams and less environmental regulation, which upset Nevada County Supervisor Heidi Hall.

"Very disappointed to hear a highly partisan, extremist speech filled with alternative facts about a dark dystopian future created by evil environmentalist lefties at what was billed as a non-political northern region water symposium," Hall wrote on her Facebook page.

Maybe that's why she wasn't invited to a little get together with LaMalfa arranged by Barbara Jones of Indivisible Women of Nevada County. Senum and Dardick were among those who attended the affair. Everybody got a chance to articulate their pet gripe, but it's unlikely any minds were changed. Senum gave LaMalfa credit for being respectful and listening to his constituents.

The demonstration broke up with no arrests and nobody being hurt. The Sacramento Bee ignored the event, but The Union and some other media covered it so the protesters got some leverage out of their effort. The next opportunity locals have to join the national protest will come in April, when LaMalfa said he'll hold a town meeting. For those so inclined, it will be another opportunity to participate in the great American tradition of political theater.

But there's evidence to suggest that opposition to Trump is more substantial than just people venting their frustration at public demonstrations. A woman I know who attended the Indivisible Women of Nevada County meeting at Miners Foundry two days after the Auburn demonstration reports that the venue was jammed, the women focused on bringing about meaningful change rather than theatrics.

Trump and his acolytes have an interesting four years ahead of them.

George Boardman lives at Lake of the Pines. His column is published Mondays by The Union.

Here is the original post:
George Boardman: 'Herbal Tea Party' movement more than traditional political theater - The Union of Grass Valley

There is a direct lineage between the Occupy Wall Street movement, the enormous and historic contribution that Sen. Bernie SandersBernie SandersMoral outrage shrouds reality of Russian hacking case Left wing protests only strengthen the Right Sanders, Occupy Wall Street and the liberal Tea Party surge MORE (I-Vt.) made in the 2016 presidential campaign, and what some call the progressive Tea Party movement that, along with other Americans, has besieged Republican officeholders at town meetings across America.

The Sanders campaign for president was a defining moment in American political history one that has continuing impact on his work in the Senate today, the creation of groups such as Our Revolution that supports his agenda, and Sanders's coming role in the 2018 midterm elections and the 2020 presidential campaign.

The continuing power of the Sanders movement results from the fact that not only did he inspire a large number of citizens to participate in politics, but revolutionized campaign finance by inspiring small donors. Those donors broke the old politics paradigm of seeking large contributions and special interest money that usually paid for consultant-driven negative television ads.

In 2016 Sanders inspired, motivated and organized a continuing political movement based on progressive ideas, institutional reform and the kind of dramatic change that voters hunger for.

Before the Sanders campaign, there was the Occupy Wall Street movement, and today, there is the so-called progressive version of the Tea Party movement reminiscent of the movement that brought conservatives and Republicans to power beginning in the 2010 midterms.

The Occupy Wall Street movement, which I strongly supported and continue to support, was a frontal challenge to the power exercised by the 1 percent, who do so at the expense of the 99 percent who are the heart and soul of America.

The mistake many Democrats made, including the Obama White House, was that they felt threatened by Occupy Wall Street. After all, President Obama was not elected in 2008 to name Timothy Geithner, a close ally of the largest financial institutions of the world, as his Treasury secretary. But Obama did.

The mistake Occupy Wall Street made understandably so, but still a tactical mistake was to respond by rejecting involvement in electoral politics.

Sanders and his campaign filled this gap, brought together grassroots action and direct political involvement, and brought large numbers of new people into politics who remain active and engaged in politics today.

The continuing Sanders movement embodied by Our Revolution is critical to the future of American politics, and the so-called liberal Tea Party movement is similar and also important by forcing Republican officeholders to publicly answer questions they would rather duck at town meetings.

With two critical elections approaching in 2018 and 2020, it is important to fully understand and act on the differences between presidential elections and midterm elections just as I mentioned in my last column on the anti-Trump wave that could define the midterm elections in 2018.

In the 2020 presidential election, Democrats and all Americans will have the opportunity to elect a transforming progressive president. In the midterm elections, though, the prime directive is to elect the progressive and moderate Democrats needed to put a brake on the power of President Trump and the Republican Congress.

The anti-Trump wave extends far beyond the traditional Democratic base. It includes the huge number of Americans who now realize they will be hurt by repeal or destruction of ObamaCare; the huge number of Americans who are angered and fearful of attacks against a free press; those appalled by the key members of the Trump administration who bear false witness about meetings with the Russians who attack our democracy; and those who reject the "swamp" in Washington that has actually gotten worse, since a number of Trump officials embody the special interests of political "swamp" Trump falsely claimed he would drain.

Democrats and progressives have an opportunity in 2018 to restore and widen our traditional coalition, maintain the momentum of the Sanders movement, inspire voters who stayed home in 2016, and end the one-party monopoly of power that the GOP now holds.

This will require supporting progressive Democrats and also supporting moderate, red-state Democrats, and, above all, finding new and appealing challengers to take the fight to Republicans in every district and state across the nation.

Brent Budowsky was an aide to former Sen. Lloyd Bentsen (D-Texas) and former Chief Deputy Majority Whip Bill Alexander (D-Ark.). He holds an LL.M. degree in international financial law from the London School of Economics. He is a longtime regular columnist for The Hill and can be contacted at brentbbi@webtv.net.

The views of contributors are their own and not the views of The Hill.

Go here to see the original:
Sanders, Occupy Wall Street and the liberal Tea Party surge - The Hill (blog)

March 1, 2017 AtlantaIf this was a Trump-era reprise of the tea party, it was a distinctly less energized one than eight years ago, when a horseback Paul Revere delighted a huge crowd of self-described patriots outside the Georgia Capitol.

On Monday in Atlanta, veteran tea party organizers were among about 150 people who gathered to wave placards, including one depicting fake news media personalities with their hair on fire while President Trump smiles in the background.

On Feb. 25, Mr. Trump had tweeted, Maybe the millions of people who voted to MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN should have their own rally. It would be the biggest of them all!

But the Atlanta rally, though festive, portrayed an oddly subdued optic for a president who has repeatedly measured his popularity not by polls but by crowd sizes. Similar events in Louisiana and Colorado, part of a wave of some 70 "Spirit of America" rallies this week, also had only modest attendance in contrast with the large, rowdy crowds that have turned out to protest the Trump administration.

While the largest gatherings are expected Saturday, the relatively small turnout of these pro-Trump rallies so far underscores concern that the largely white, middle-class conservatives who led an insurgency against the Washington establishment have yet to demonstrate as much strength in empowering Mr. Trump and other outsiders now that they're in government.

In some ways, that's only natural, say experts.

Protests, even rallies, are tactics by people feeling disenfranchised the tea party worked largely because the Democrats had the White House and Congress so it makes sense now that the resistance [to Trump] movement is the one gaining traction, says University of Maryland sociologist Dana Fisher, who studies social movements and civic participation. So it seems a bit of a rookie move to call people to go to the streets to support you when you have all the power, because that strategy is hard to be successful at.

But those allied with the tea party movement defend the somewhat counterintuitive bid by the tea party movement to essentially "make the establishment great again after spending the bulk of eight years knocking it down. We are now in a position to be a positive working force for this country, says B.J. Van Gundy, a former state GOP vice chair.

Eight years after at least 30,000 people took to the streets and 1,000 tea party groups bloomed in the wake of President Obamas election and the 2008 Wall Street bailout, the tea party can in many ways claim not just Trump the bull-in-a-china-shop outsider who speaks of a leaner American government but a broader ideological victory. It has transformed the Republican Party while pushing the Democrats to the margins of power, except in the big cities.

Yet the mood at Mondays Atlanta rally was less euphoric than defensive.

Tea Party Patriots founder and national political coordinator Jenny Beth Martin said complacency could lead to disappointment for conservatives, given a rising opposition tide. We cant just step back and expect Trump to make it all happen by himself, she says.

To tea party leaders like Georgia state Sen. Josh McKoon, the movement's message is relevant not just in support of Mr. Trump, but also the continued necessity to keep both parties honest.

After all, he says, the tea party rose up as a Republican insurgency and succeeded even as similar movements on the left, including Occupy Wall Street and the Bernie Bros largely failed, at least electorally.

This push to protect basic rights for Americans is not controversial, and the vast majority of people are with us, says Senator McKoon. But they need encouragement. This goes deep, and its beyond any single party.

Nevertheless, the tea party and Trump, some activists admit, are hardly a perfect fit. Trumps policies threaten to drive up national debt, which the tea party sought to slash. And his administration has vowed to reassert federal authority on states rights issues like marijuana legalization.

At the same time, We cant have purity tests when it comes to politics, says Mr. Van Gundy, who helped usher tea party candidates into the Georgia legislature. Trump is headed in the right direction on a lot of things.

After Trumps speech to Congress on Tuesday night, the Tea Party Express issued a statement saying that their usual annual rebuttal to the president's address wasn't necessary because Trump essentially did their work for them.

President Trump delivered an eloquent address, where he clearly and deliberately laid out his conservative vision for America, the statement said. "It should now be clear to everyone that the Tea Party movement is more than rallies and protests. We have arrived in D.C., through our elected representatives, to fulfill our mission and finally rein in government."

Indeed, political scientists say the sparse attendance at Trump rallies underscores that theres not much energy on the right, because their grass-roots are kind of satisfied O.K., we got our guy in there, and weve got Congress while the reluctant Trump voters are trying to absorb all this and figure out what it means, says Emory University political scientist Alan Abramowitz. Meanwhile, [many Republicans] dont realize they might be in trouble.

In Georgias hotly contested Sixth Congressional District, for example, Trump beat Hillary Clinton by only 1 percentage point, a potential problem since its a conservative-leaning suburban district.

Add the galvanizing effect of constituent town halls on many voters, and that's created an opening for Jon Osoff, a 30-something Democrat with what the Daily Beast's Patricia Murphy calls an economy-first pragmatism buttressed by unqualified support for liberal causes.

Conservatives in office find themselves pressured by town halls, and the trouble such voter discontent may spell for 2018 midterm elections.

Rep. Darrell Issa (R) of California, usually a conservative bulldog, pushed for a substantial investigation into Russian election interference despite Trump's dismissal of such claims as unfounded. In a recent US News & World Report piece, Yale University political scientist John Stoeher saw in that decision aa sign of concern about a looming pushback at the voting booth. Mr. Issas district, Mr. Stoeher pointed out, is on the outskirts of Los Angeles and ... dramatically favored Clinton.

But now that the populist movement spawned by the tea party finds itselfin power, critics would be remiss by reading too much into low attendance at such events, political scientists say.

More telling is whether a revived tea party can turn itself into a relevant counter-movement to what Ms. Fisher, the University of Maryland sociologist, says is a building resistance from the left to the new Trump establishment.

Counting numbers does tell you some things, including that getting 150 people out to support an incumbent administration on a Monday is a fair amount, says Michael Heaney, a political sociologist at the University of Michigan in Ann Arbor. The key thing is that its an opportunity for people to talk to one another and build a political organization. Its really about how these rallies feed into their ability to plan future events.

Continued here:
Tea party's bid to 'make the establishment great again' - CSMonitor ... - Christian Science Monitor

This presents a crucial test to the tea party movement that has reshaped American politics since 2008. The most obvious challenge is that Trump has chosen to leave Social Security and Medicare alone, two of the biggest components of the federal budget and two prime targets for conservatives like Speaker Paul Ryan.

Trump is going to assure Congress that the draconian cuts to domestic programs like the Environmental Protection Agency, reductions which tea party Republicans love, will balance out the huge increase in military spending. But the reality will be different.

President Ronald Reagan learned in the early 1980s that cutting government programs is extremely hard in practice. When Reagan slashed income taxes and boosted military spending, promising to balance the budget with domestic cuts, he failed. Reagan also backed away from cuts to Social Security and Medicare when he faced a political backlash for trying.

In the end, deficits skyrocketed in the 1980s. Reagan faced a Democratic House. Yet we have seen that Trump is already learning how hard it is to cut government, even in a moment of united partisan control, as he backs away from eliminating increasingly popular parts of the Affordable Care Act. In his speech to Congress, he also promised to move forward with a $1 trillion infrastructure bill, which surely won't sit well with fiscal conservatives in his party.

Finally, this increase in military spending is a significant expansion of the federal government. While tea party Republicans might want to distinguish national security from the rest of government, in reality if they swallow this proposal they are revealing that conservatism really is about what kind of government to support, not whether big government is bad.

Tea party Republicans insisted that they would be different and for much of the time that they have had representation in Congress since 2008 they have been true to the word. They have been an intensely ideological coalition, insisting on a commitment to purity on policy that left the Obama administration deeply frustrated and tied up in knots.

Added to all this is the curveball that the president threw when he announced that he is open to immigration reform that would allow a large number of undocumented immigrants to remain in the country. Despite his continued attacks on undocumented immigrants in his address, the mere mention of a proposal to liberalize policy is anathema to many Tea Party Republicans who represent constituencies that are sympathetic to hardline anti-immigration sentiment.

The Republicans went to great lengths to fight Obama on spending cuts. When Obama sought compromise, they stood their ground in the budget battles of 2011, threatening to send the federal government into default. Hawkish Republicans were equally frustrated with their tea party colleagues when Congress could not reach agreement on spending in 2013 and as a result of the rules put into place in 2011, forced the implementation of budget sequestration that imposed caps on military and not domestic spending.

When Republican leaders like former Speaker John Boehner showed that they were willing to give even an inch to the Democrats, the tea party toppled them from power.

The current Speaker, Paul Ryan, has built much of his career around promising tea party Republicans that he would move forward with "entitlement reform" (meaning Social Security, Medicare and Medicaid cuts) despite the political risks. He has been a zealot on this issue and hoped that this moment of unified government would offer an unprecedented opportunity. A frustrated Speaker Ryan, who said after the election that Trump had a "mandate," has now warned: "I've been a big time entitlement reformer for a long time because if you don't start bending the curve in the out years, we are hosed."

By supporting Trump, tea party Republicans would also put themselves on the record as being in favor of big increases in certain kinds of government spending.

Tea party Republicans will soon discover that President Trump's budget doesn't really add up. They will be receiving numbers from a Republican administration, which generally is sympathetic to their goals on most major issues, that will contradict their promise to the reddest constituents that they would hold firm on the anti-government cause. Jim DeMint, the former South Carolina senator, said, "America cannot wait any longer before we get serious about balancing the budget."

Trump is putting the Republican Party in a difficult spot at a moment of united government that could easily have turned into a period of triumph. If tea party Republican members of Congress swallow what the President has sent them, they will quickly reveal to their supporters that they are as craven and opportunistic as anyone else in Washington. They will place themselves at risk to be "tea partied" out of office and they will greatly damage their own credibility with the electorate in the coming election cycle.

If they hold to principle, as they did under President Obama, then the Republicans as a party will be facing a dangerous moment. A Republican President, who has shown that he doesn't have much loyalty when it comes to people getting in the way of his success, will be facing off against a huge portion of the congressional Republicans. The Freedom Caucus, with about 32 votes, has the numbers in the House to tie up the administration.

Will Republicans unite and make the most of their control of Congress and the White House? Or will many of them remain true to their small government philosophy and risk war with a White House that wants to reshape Washington?

Continue reading here:
Trump's huge challenge to the tea party - CNN.com - CNN