Archive for the ‘Tea Party’ Category

From red bastion to blue bulwark: What the political shift in Colorado … – Las Vegas Sun

By Mark Barabak

Monday, March 27, 2023 | 2 a.m.

DENVER Kevin Priola was a Republican before he could even vote.

Inspired by Ronald Reagan, he preregistered with the GOP at age 17. He joined the College Republicans at the University of Colorado Boulder a true act of faith in that liberal stronghold and was elected to the Legislature in 2008, where hes served ever since.

But Priola slowly grew estranged from the GOP, seeing it as more authoritarian than conservative, and last August he became a Democrat.

I couldnt stomach it, Priola said of his old party, and associate with that style and brand of politics.

Hes hardly alone.

In the last two decades, the Republican ranks in Colorado have shrunk drastically, to just a quarter of registered voters, as the once reliably red state has turned a distinct shade of blue.

The transformation is part of a larger political shift. Once a Republican bulwark, the West has become Democratic bedrock. That, in turn, has reshaped presidential politics nationwide.

With a big chunk of the West California, Colorado, New Mexico, Oregon, Washington seemingly locked up, Democrats are free to focus more heavily on the perennial battlegrounds of the Midwest and venture into once-solidly Republican states such as Georgia.

The changes didnt just happen, like the snow embroidering the Rockies in winter, or the runoff that swells Colorados icy rivers in the spring. It took money, strategy, demographic changes and, not least, a sharp rightward turn by Republicans.

No state in the region has changed its partisan coloration as emphatically over the last two decades as Colorado. From a Western swing state, it has become a Democratic stronghold, said pollster Floyd Ciruli, whos sampled public opinion in Colorado for more than 40 years.

In 2004, Democrats essentially gave up and wrote the place off; theyve carried Colorado in every presidential contest since. In 2020, Joe Biden romped to a 13-point win over President Donald Trump, the largest Democratic victory here in more than half a century.

Patrick Winkler helped change the political complexion of Colorado.

In the last 20 years, the state has gained more than 1.3 million residents, most settling like Winkler in Denver or the suburbs along the Front Range.

Winkler moved three years ago from California, in part because the 29-year-old real estate agent wanted to own a home and knew his money would go further in Colorado.

The political views he imported are typical of Winklers cohort, which tends toward left of center. He voted for Biden in 2020 and Democratic Gov. Jared Polis last November, largely because of his contempt for the GOP and a particular dislike for Donald Trump.

It was less a personal opinion about the candidates, said Winkler, who wound up buying a three-story townhouse near downtown Denver. It was about the general outlook of the parties and what they stand for.

The influx of young arrivals is not a new phenomenon. Colorado has long been a magnet for 20- and 30-somethings, drawn by the states mouthwatering scenery, outdoorsy lifestyle and, more recently, its thriving tech and service industries.

What has changed are those whove found their home in the Democratic Party: They are younger, more affluent, better educated, and more liberal on issues such as abortion and gay rights.

In short, Democrats are now much more in tune with Colorado, one of the best-educated and socially liberal states in the country, as the Republican base has gotten older, less educated, more evangelical and more Trumpy.

When Lori Weigel moved to Denver in 1997, she recalled, the Broncos always won and the Republican Party always won.

Now, the GOP strategist lamented, we have a losing football team and, statewide, a losing Republican brand.

Gov. Polis sits in his spacious office in the state Capitol, his 13-year-old terrier mix, Gia, curled in a chair by his side. His dress gray suit and a purple polo shirt with matching Nike sneakers is a mash-up of tech bro and standard-issue government executive.

At 47, Polis has been a multimillionaire for over two decades. He made a fortune in the frothy days of the commercial internet, founding, among other flourishing businesses, an online flower delivery service.

Before seeking elected office, Polis played a key role in Colorados makeover as one of the gang of four a quartet of rich donors who spent millions, starting in the early 2000s, building a political support system and recruiting and funding Democratic candidates.

Colorados shift, he said, is not due to funding. And thats true to a large extent, though the cash infusion didnt hurt. More important is the branding of Democrats in Colorado as the party of the center.

The state is not a playground for the fringe left, said Chris Hughes, a former Colorado Democratic Party chairman.

Polis, who boasts of cutting taxes and wielding a light hand during the COVID-19 pandemic, is the latest in a string of statewide Democratic officeholders whove bucked the national partys leftward shift.

There was the cowboy-hatted U.S. Sen. Ken Salazar, who made bipartisanship a calling card in Washington. Before Polis came the relatively centrist Govs. Bill Ritter, an ex-prosecutor, and John Hickenlooper, a former oil company geologist.

Meantime, Republicans offered candidates from the tea party movement and fire-breathers like the anti-immigration crusader Tom Tancredo.

For Polis, who disdains hard-liners in both parties, ideology is something of a four-letter word. Hes quick to point out that Democratic registration has fallen in Colorado alongside that of the GOP. Though not nearly as much.

Colorado Republicans have fared worse than Democrats, Polis said, because GOP candidates have focused too much on culture-war issues and plunged down rabbit holes like Trumps bogus claims of a stolen election. (This month, the Colorado Republican Party chose an election denier as its chairman.)

Any candidate who wants to win in Colorado has to talk about and have solutions for the issues that matter most to everyday Coloradans, Polis said, ticking those off: education, affordable housing, traffic, congestion.

Casi Smigelsky works in tech sales in Denver and, like most Coloradans, belongs to no political party.

The 33-year-old considers herself a fiscal conservative and is not a Biden fan too much of a relic, she says of the 80-year-old president. But Smigelsky has an even harsher view of the GOP.

Theyve become a party of hate, she said, and a party of taking rights away.

Though Smigelsky could see herself voting for a moderate Republican for president, if one somehow won the nomination in 2024, there is no way she will cast a ballot for Trump, the early GOP front-runner.

Absolutely not, she said. Absolutely never.

Republicans were in decline in Colorado well before Trump bulled his way into the White House. The former presidents deceit and the mayhem he spawned hastened the free fall.

Dick Wadhams, a fourth-generation Coloradan and longtime GOP campaign consultant, said its hard these days for Republicans to even get an impartial hearing from voters, regardless of a candidates personal qualities and beliefs.

He imagines typical Colorado voters saying to themselves, Were not going to entrust these offices to the Republican Party, even if these individuals look like theyre solid, because the party is crazy overall.

Pam Anderson can speak to that.

Anderson was featured on Time magazines cover last October as one of the defenders fighting to save democracy after she bested a Trump loyalist and election denier to win the GOP nomination for secretary of state, the overseer of Colorados balloting.

I was a vocal opponent of everything Trump said about elections, Anderson said at a Denver coffee bar. Everything.

Still, she said, opponents ran millions of dollars in commercials saying I was too MAGA for Colorado. She leaned back, as if still reeling. I couldnt raise enough money to combat that.

Anderson shrugged. She threw up her hands.

She lost by double digits, gone in a tide that delivered Democrats all four statewide offices and underscored a sea change that has remade Colorado and dramatically refashioned the West.

Mark Barabak is a columnist for the Los Angeles Times.

Read this article:
From red bastion to blue bulwark: What the political shift in Colorado ... - Las Vegas Sun

Opposition demand caste-based census, skip Shindes tea party on eve of budget session – Hindustan Times

Opposition demand caste-based census, skip Shindes tea party on eve of budget session  Hindustan Times

View post:
Opposition demand caste-based census, skip Shindes tea party on eve of budget session - Hindustan Times

Boston Tea Party | Facts, Summary, & Significance | Britannica

Top Questions

Did the Boston Tea Party happen during the American Revolution?

The Boston Tea Party took place on the night of December 16, 1773, a few years before the start of the American Revolution in 1775. It was an act of protest in which a group of 60 American colonists threw 342 chests of tea into Boston Harbor to agitate against both a tax on tea (which had been an example of taxation without representation) and the perceived monopoly of the East India Company.

How did the Boston Tea Party start?

The passage of the Tea Act (1773) by the British Parliament gave the East India Company exclusive rights to transport tea to the colonies and empowered it to undercut all of its competitors. The leaders of other major cities in the colonies cancelled their orders in protest, but the governor of the Massachusetts Bay Colony allowed tea to arrive in Boston. In response, several colonists stormed the tea ships and tossed the cargo overboard.

What did the Boston Tea Party lead to?

The Boston Tea Party pushed Britains Parliament to assert its authorityand it passed the Intolerable Acts in 1774. These punitive measures included closing Bostons harbour until restitution was made for the tea, reducing the Massachusetts Bay Colony to a crown colony with appointed, rather than elected, officials, and allowing the quartering of troops in vacant buildings across British North America. The measures became the justification for convening the First Continental Congress later in 1774.

Boston Tea Party, (December 16, 1773), incident in which 342 chests of tea belonging to the British East India Company were thrown from ships into Boston Harbor by American patriots disguised as Mohawk Indians. The Americans were protesting both a tax on tea (taxation without representation) and the perceived monopoly of the East India Company.

The Townshend Acts passed by Parliament in 1767 and imposing duties on various products imported into the British colonies had raised such a storm of colonial protest and noncompliance that they were repealed in 1770, saving the duty on tea, which was retained by Parliament to demonstrate its presumed right to raise such colonial revenue without colonial approval. The merchants of Boston circumvented the act by continuing to receive tea smuggled in by Dutch traders. In 1773 Parliament passed a Tea Act designed to aid the financially troubled East India Company by granting it (1) a monopoly on all tea exported to the colonies, (2) an exemption on the export tax, and (3) a drawback (refund) on duties owed on certain surplus quantities of tea in its possession. The tea sent to the colonies was to be carried only in East India Company ships and sold only through its own agents, bypassing the independent colonial shippers and merchants. The company thus could sell the tea at a less-than-usual price in either America or Britain; it could undersell anyone else. The perception of monopoly drove the normally conservative colonial merchants into an alliance with radicals led by Samuel Adams and his Sons of Liberty.

In such cities as New York, Philadelphia, and Charleston, tea agents resigned or canceled orders, and merchants refused consignments. In Boston, however, the royal governor Thomas Hutchinson determined to uphold the law and maintained that three arriving ships, the Dartmouth, Eleanor, and Beaver, should be allowed to deposit their cargoes and that appropriate duties should be honoured. On the night of December 16, 1773, a group of about 60 men, encouraged by a large crowd of Bostonians, donned blankets and Indian headdresses, marched to Griffins wharf, boarded the ships, and dumped the tea chests, valued at 18,000, into the water.

In retaliation, Parliament passed the series of punitive measures known in the colonies as the Intolerable Acts, including the Boston Port Bill, which shut off the citys sea trade pending payment for the destroyed tea. The British governments efforts to single out Massachusetts for punishment served only to unite the colonies and impel the drift toward war.

Link:
Boston Tea Party | Facts, Summary, & Significance | Britannica

No compromise in attending T.N. Governors tea party: CM Stalin – The Hindu

No compromise in attending T.N. Governors tea party: CM Stalin  The Hindu

Link:
No compromise in attending T.N. Governors tea party: CM Stalin - The Hindu

Boston Tea Party (political party) – Wikipedia

Political party in United States

The Boston Tea Party (BTP) was a United States political party named after the event known as the Boston Tea Party of 1773.

The political party's ideology was libertarian. A group of former Libertarian Party (LP) members founded the party in 2006. They criticized the LP for its "abdication of political responsibilities", saying that "Americans deserve and desperately need a pro-freedom party that forcefully advocates libertarian solutions to the issues of today".[2]

The party effectively disbanded in July 2012.[3]

The Boston Tea Party supported reducing the size, scope and power of government at all levels and on all issues and opposed increasing the size, scope and power of government at any level for any purpose.[citation needed]

The party's 20082010 program the four points of Ron Paul's Campaign for Liberty[4] advocated, among other things, the withdrawal of all American troops from around the world, including Korea, Japan, Europe and the entire Middle East; an immediate and complete end to warrantless searches and seizures, warrantless surveillance, and other practices that encroach on personal freedom; and an audit of the Federal Reserve.[5] The program was deliberately adopted from Ron Paul's Campaign for Liberty.[6]

On December 2, 2009, the national committee passed a spoon in Support of Honest Money.[7] One week later Ron Paul introduced H.R. 4248: Free Competition in Currency Act of 2009, a bill 'To repeal the legal tender laws, to prohibit taxation on certain coins and bullion, and to repeal superfluous sections related to coinage.'[8][9]

The party's members adopted their 20102012 program at their online convention held in May 2010. Its five main points are 1) End the Wars of Aggression and withdraw US troops from around the world, 2) End the Federal Reserve Banking System, 3) End the War on Drugs, 4) End Abuses of Liberty such as the Patriot Act and Military Commissions Act, 5) End the Immigration Fiasco by eliminating government restrictions on human migration.[10]

The 2010 Boston Tea Party convention passed resolutions: calling for an independent investigation into the events of September 11, 2001; opposing intervention in Colombia; in support of the "Liberty Amendment"; and renouncing government in all forms.[11] On July 5, 2010, the National Committee passed a resolution opposing "Top Two".[12] On August 8, 2010, the National Committee passed a resolution to join the Coalition Against War Spending.[13]On November 19, 2010, the Boston Tea Party National Committee passed resolutions; opposing the TSA, naked porno-scanners & enhanced pat-downs and supporting the 2nd & 9th Amendments to the Constitution of the United States of America.[14]On February 4, 2011, the Boston Tea Party National Committee passed a resolution of support for the Tunisian and Egyptian people as well as the "rights of all peoples wishing to alter or abolish their present form of government."[15]On March 1, 2011, the Boston Tea Party National Committee passed a resolution supporting War Crimes trials for every person that has violated the 'law of war'. The BTP National Committee also passed a resolution condemning government censorship and any press organization and/or members of the media that intentionally distort and/or misrepresent facts.[16]

The final program adopted on May 2, 2012 read: "1. Monetary policy reform: Repeal legal tender law, allow for free competition of currency, and prohibit federal and state taxes on precious metal coins and bullion.2. Real budgetary reform: Abolish all subsidies/entitlements, drastically cut military spending, cut salary of all federal employees (including elected and appointed officials) and liquidate all government assets other than necessary office buildings.3. Pass the Downsize DC agenda of Congressional reforms: Read the Bills Act, One Subject at a Time Act, Write the Laws Act, and Enumerated Powers Act.4. End the Wars Abroad: immediately cease all foreign intervention and bring home troops stationed abroad.5. End the Wars at home: war on drugs, war on poverty, war on civil liberties."[17]

The party was founded in objection to new policy changes by the Libertarian Party announced at its Oregon convention in 2006.[18]

In September 2008, the libertarian website LewRockwell.com posted an article by libertarian economist Walter Block. In it, Block proclaimed his preference for the Boston Tea Party's candidates over those of the LP.[19] Block and other libertarians expressed discomfort over the "unlibertarian" history of the LP's 2008 presidential candidate, Bob Barr, a former Republican congressman.[citation needed]

On the April 19, 2011, episode of Jeopardy! the BTP was a $2,000 clue in a category called "The Mad Tea Party".[20]

On July 22, 2012, Darryl Perry announced his resignation as chair of the party.[21] As there were only two remaining members of the BTP National Committee at that time, Perry's resignation effectively disbanded the party.[citation needed]

Charles Jay was the party's first presidential nominee. He received the BTP presidential nomination in the 2008 general election. He was on the ballot in Florida, Tennessee and Colorado[22] and was a write-in candidate in more than ten other states. Thomas L. Knapp was the party's vice presidential nominee.[23] Knapp was also a candidate for US Congress as a Libertarian Party candidate in the same election.[24] However, alternate running mates included Marilyn Chambers (Arkansas, Hawaii, Louisiana, Nevada, New Mexico, Oklahoma, South Carolina, South Dakota, and Utah), Barry Hess (Arizona), Dan Sallis, Jr. (Colorado), John Wayne Smith (Florida) and Thomas J. Marino (Washington).[25][26]

In the 2008 presidential election, Jay received 2,422 votes, putting him in 15th place.[27]

On December 23, 2011, after a two-day Presidential Nominating Convention which took place online and was open to all BTP members, Tiffany Briscoe of Maryland was chosen as the 2012 BTP presidential nominee on the first round of voting with 13 out of 20 votes.[28] Kimberly Johnson Barrick of Arizona was chosen as the vice presidential nominee on the 2nd round of voting.[29]

On March 6, 2012, the party membership removed Briscoe as the BTP presidential nominee, replacing her with NOTA.[30]

On March 20, 2012, the party membership passed a motion to hold a new presidential nominating convention, which began on March 30, 2012.[31] Jim Duensing of Nevada was nominated on the 4th round of balloting.[32] Barrick remained the VP nominee.

Ultimately, the BTP did not run a candidate in the general election as the party disbanded in July 2012.[33]

See the rest here:
Boston Tea Party (political party) - Wikipedia