Archive for the ‘Ukraine’ Category

OPEC is on the wrong side of history in sticking with Russia, Ukraine’s Naftogaz CEO says – CNBC

Naftogaz CEO Yuriy Vitrenko says OPEC is on the wrong side of history in choosing to stick with Russia.

Future Publishing | Future Publishing | Getty Images

The chief executive of Ukrainian state energy giant Naftogaz says oil producer group OPEC is on the wrong side of history in choosing to stick with Russia to stabilize energy markets.

Speaking to CNBC's Hadley Gamble at the World Economic Forum in Davos on Monday, Naftogaz CEO Yuriy Vitrenko warned the Middle East-dominated group of exporting countries to recognize the Kremlin's onslaught in Ukraine as a challenge to their wealth.

When asked whether OPEC was in danger of being out of sync with the international community over Russia's widely condemned invasion, Vitrenko replied: "Yes, it seems like they are on the wrong side of history."

"They have a vested interest in the economic development of the world, in the sustainability of the world and Putin is challenging this sustainability. He is challenging their wealth. Maybe they don't understand it at the moment but if we live in the world that Putin wants us to live in, there will be no wealth for the Gulf countries," he continued.

"Again, everything they have been building for years will just disappear. They have to be fully aware of it," Vitrenko said.

A spokesperson for OPEC was not immediately available to comment.

Governments around the world have imposed a barrage of unprecedented punitive sanctions and severed economic ties with Russia in response to President Vladimir Putin's war with Ukraine. However, OPEC does not appear willing to take similar action against Moscow.

Russia is a key partner in the wider OPEC+ energy alliance and is itself a major exporter of oil.

OPEC kingpin Saudi Arabia has previously said the group would keep politics out of its output decisions.

Speaking to CNBC in late March, Saudi Arabia's Energy Minister Prince Abdulaziz bin Salman bin Abdulaziz said that OPEC's very existence was dependent on the separation of its mission to stabilize oil prices from other geopolitical factors.

CNBC's Elliot Smith contributed to this report.

Follow CNBC International onTwitterandFacebook.

Read more here:
OPEC is on the wrong side of history in sticking with Russia, Ukraine's Naftogaz CEO says - CNBC

YouTube removes more than 9,000 channels relating to Ukraine war – The Guardian

YouTube has taken down more than 70,000 videos and 9,000 channels related to the war in Ukraine for violating content guidelines, including removal of videos that referred to the invasion as a liberation mission.

The platform is hugely popular in Russia, where, unlike some of its US peers, it has not been shut down despite hosting content from opposition figures such as Alexei Navalny. YouTube has also been able to operate in Russia despite cracking down on pro-Kremlin content that has broken guidelines including its major violent events policy, which prohibits denying or trivialising the invasion.

Since the conflict began in February, YouTube has taken down channels including that of the pro-Kremlin journalist Vladimir Solovyov. Channels associated with Russias Ministries of Defence and Foreign Affairs have also been temporarily suspended from uploading videos in recent months for describing the war as a liberation mission.

YouTubes chief product officer, Neal Mohan, said: We have a major violent events policy and that applies to things like denial of major violent events: everything from the Holocaust to Sandy Hook. And of course, whats happening in Ukraine is a major violent event. And so weve used that policy to take unprecedented action.

In an interview with the Guardian, Mohan added that YouTubes news content on the conflict had received more than 40m views in Ukraine alone.

The first and probably most paramount responsibility is making sure that people who are looking for information about this event can get accurate, high-quality, credible information on YouTube, he said. The consumption of authoritative channels on our platform has grown significantly, of course in Ukraine, but also in countries surrounding Ukraine, Poland, and also within Russia itself.

YouTube did not provide a breakdown of the taken-down content and channels but Mohan said much of it represented Kremlin narratives about the invasion. I dont have the specific numbers, but you can imagine a lot of it being the narratives that are coming from Russian government, or Russian actors on behalf of the Russian government, he said.

Sign up to First Edition, our free daily newsletter every weekday morning at 7am BST

YouTube has an estimated 90 million users in Russia, although it no longer allows advertising on the platform in the country. The decision by YouTubes parent company, Google, has drawn protests from Navalny, who said well-targeted ads helped counteract Kremlin propaganda.

YouTube remains the largest video-sharing site up and running in Russia itself, said Mohan. So YouTube is a place where Russian citizens can get uncensored information about the war, including from many of the same authoritative channels that we all have access to outside of the country. We remain an important platform for Russian citizens themselves as this crisis continues to evolve.

Last week, the Russian minister for digital development, Maksut Shadaev, said the country would not block YouTube, despite disputes over content that have resulted in the platform being fined in court for not removing banned videos.

Shadaev indicated that blocking Russias most popular social media platform would affect users. We are not planning to close YouTube, the minister said. Above all, when we restrict something, we should clearly understand that our users wont suffer.

YouTube has also placed a worldwide ban on channels associated with Russian state media, including Russia Today and Sputnik. Facebook and Instagram are banned in Russia and access to Twitter has been restricted, in response to the platforms own bans on Russian state-owned media.

See the original post:
YouTube removes more than 9,000 channels relating to Ukraine war - The Guardian

Ukraine war: Russia’s blockade will increase starvation and global instability, UN organisation warns – Sky News

Russia's blockade of Ukraine will lead to worsening starvation, famine and instability around the world if it cannot be lifted, the World Food Programme has said.

The warning came as Sky News gained rare access to Odesa port on Ukraine's Black Sea coast.

The port should be busy exporting tens of thousands of tonnes of grain but its huge grain elevators stand idle.

Sky was shown a huge grain cargo vessel loaded with 60,000 tonnes.

It should have sailed for Egypt in February but remains moored up thanks to Russia's naval blockade.

Opposite the ship, 30 huge silos stand full of grain.

A quarter of a million tonnes has been sitting there for months with no means of getting it out to sea.

Matthew Hollingworth is World Food Programme emergency co-ordinator for Ukraine.

He says unless something gives the impact will be devastating around the world.

'Public dissatisfaction' predicted in Russia after death toll claim - live Ukraine war updates

"There's no question it's going to mean areas of starvation in the world are going to get worse. That famine will get worse.

"And we're in a situation where the world's economies are only partially getting better from COVID-19 and this situation is going to tip many countries over the edge."

They call Ukraine the breadbasket of the world.

Its rich black earth is among the best soil in the world. Its fertility allows Ukraine to export 70% of its crops. Its harvest last year fed an extraordinary 400 million people.

Dutch farmer Kees Huizinga came here to Odesa to farm 20 years ago.

His farm is vast by British standards, stretching over 37,000 acres.

He has managed to export some of last year's harvest overland by truck, but it's a six-day wait at the border and will only shift a fraction of his grain.

If the naval blockade is not lifted he says, it will be disastrous for those who depend on him and millions around the world.

He said: "For us, for the company, it means bankruptcy and 400 employees without a job and me without a job and for the world it means a huge gap in the world food supply.

"I mean more than 70% of Ukrainian crops are meant for export and people who really need them in the poor countries, they won't receive it, so they're going to die."

Even if the EU opened up its land borders to Ukrainian grain, two million tonnes at the most could be exported a month.

Between five and seven million tonnes needs to be getting out.

Ukraine says it needs NATO to take action to escort cargo ships through the blockade or be given weapons to let it attack Russia's navy instead.

That would risk confrontation between NATO and Russia.

But the alternative could be global instability, civil unrest elsewhere, possibly revolution and war.

Western governments are wrestling with the problem but three months in they have not found a solution and time is running out.

Ukraine's next harvest is in a month or two's time. If Ukrainian farmers cannot sell their harvest by then, they will go bankrupt and will be unable to buy seed or fertiliser.

Then the world's breadbasket will see its agricultural sector become a basket case with potentially disastrous consequences for hundreds of millions.

More:
Ukraine war: Russia's blockade will increase starvation and global instability, UN organisation warns - Sky News

As the French Open Begins, the War in Ukraine Roils the Locker Room – The New York Times

PARIS The idea by the mens and womens tennis tours was to take a strong stand against Wimbledons decision to keep out players from Russia and Belarus, then let tennis and competition move the conversation away from politics and the invasion of Ukraine.

It has not worked out that way.

On Monday, the second day of the French Open, the politics of tennis and Russia reared its head once more. The professional tours announcement Friday night that they would not award rankings points this year at Wimbledon, essentially turning the most prestigious event in tennis into an exhibition and punishing players who did well there last year, has roiled the sport, igniting a sharp debate over the games role in a deeply unpopular war and dominating the conversation at the years second Grand Slam.

Lesia Tsurenko of Ukraine spoke emotionally about the invasion, saying it has made her care little about winning or losing. Iga Swiatek, the world No. 1, talked of the sport being in disarray. Naomi Osaka, one of the biggest stars, said she was leaning toward skipping Wimbledon if the decision not to award rankings points for match victories there stands.

I feel like its not united, Swiatek said after defeating Tsurenko, 6-2, 6-0, in her opening match while wearing a Ukraine pin on her cap, as she has for the past three months. Its all the people who are organizing tournaments, like, for example, WTA, ATP and I.T.F., they all have separate views, and its not joint. We feel that in the locker room a little bit, so its pretty hard.

Swiateks comments came shortly after Tsurenko described how lost she has been since late February. Tsurenko, who was ranked as high as No. 23 in 2019, said she at first wanted simply to go home and figure out how she could help with the war effort, but she decided to keep playing and competed in important tournaments in Miami and Indian Wells, Calif.

Then, after an early loss at a tournament in Marbella, Spain, and no tournament on her schedule for another three weeks, she realized she had nowhere to live or train. With the help of another player from Ukraine, Marta Kostyuk, she landed at the Piatti Tennis Center in Italy, but the psychological challenge remains of balancing her career while her country faces an existential threat.

I just want to enjoy every match, but at the same time, I dont feel that I care too much, she said. Im trying to find this balance between just go on court and dont care versus try to care. In some cases it helps.

After feeling emboldened by Wimbledons decision to bar players from Russia and Belarus, Tsurenko and her compatriots were disheartened by the WTAs decision to strike back.

When its not in your country you dont really understand how terrible it is, Tsurenko said. Compared with what she and her country have been through, giving up the chances for rankings points seems like a small price to pay, she said. For them, they feel like they are losing their job, she said of the players who are barred. I also feel many bad things. I feel a lot of terrible things, and I think, compared to that, losing a chance to play in one tournament is nothing.

She hates the propaganda used by the Russian government to disparage her country. She said no more than five players had expressed their support for her since the start of the war. She dreads being drawn against a Russian player in a tournament.

Dayana Yastremska, who is also from Ukraine and who also lost Monday, said the decision to withhold points for Wimbledon was not fair to players from Ukraine.

We are not a happy family right now, said Yastremska, who still does not have a training base and was unsure where she would spend the next weeks.

In an interview this month, Steve Simon, the chief executive of the WTA Tour, said the organization had to live up to its principle that access to tournaments for players should be based on merit alone. He also said that discriminating against a player because of the actions of her countrys government was not acceptable.

I cant imagine what the Ukrainian people are going through and feeling at this moment, and I feel bad for these athletes who are being asked to take the blame for someone elses actions, Simon said.

Russian players have expressed disappointment in Wimbledons decision and appreciation for the tours support in protecting what they view as their right to play, though no player has sought relief in the Court of Arbitration for Sport. Jeffrey Kessler, a lawyer with experience in right-to-play cases, said tennis players from Russia and Belarus would most likely have a strong case.

We are professional athletes, we put effort every day in what we do and basically want to work, said Karen Khachanov of Russia, who won his opening-round match Sunday and was a semifinalist at Wimbledon last year.

One of the few players not to express an opinion was Victoria Azarenka of Belarus, a former world No. 1 and member of the WTA Players Council, but her distress over the disagreement was clear.

I say one thing, its going to be criticized; I say another thing, its going to be criticized, said Azarenka, who once had a close relationship with President Aleksandr Lukashenko of Belarus.

In its statement Friday, the ATP said its rules and agreements existed to protect the rights of all players as a whole: Unilateral decisions of this nature, if unaddressed, set a damaging precedent for the rest of the tour. Discrimination by individual tournaments is simply not viable on a tour that operates in more than 30 countries.

The tangible impact of the ATP and WTA decisions on the sport was evident Monday as Osaka made her feelings known about possibly skipping Wimbledon. She is not a fan of grass surfaces to begin with, and without an opportunity to improve her ranking, she might struggle to find motivation.

The intention was really good, but the execution is kind of all over the place, Osaka said.

Swiatek, who is from Poland, which has supported Ukraine perhaps more than any other country, said locker room conversations, which might once have been about changing balls during matches, have shifted to discussions of war, peace and politics. She stopped short of overtly stating her position, but she hardly masked her sentiments.

All the Russian and Belarusian players are not responsible in whats going on in their country, Swiatek said. But on the other hand, the sport has been used in politics and we are kind of public personas and we have some impact on people. It would be nice if the people who are making decisions were making decisions that are going to stop Russias aggression.

Read the original here:
As the French Open Begins, the War in Ukraine Roils the Locker Room - The New York Times

"Looking Over The Italy Peace Plan To End War In Ukraine": Russia – NDTV

The Ukrainian and Russian foreign ministers met for inconclusive talks in Turkey in March. (File)

Russia today said it was looking over an Italian peace plan proposal to end the conflict in Ukraine.

"We have received it recently and are studying it," Deputy Foreign Minister Andrei Rudenko told reporters. He declined to provide any details, saying Russia would comment at a later stage.

"It has not been discussed between Russia and Italy," he said in comments carried by Russian news agencies. Talks between Russia and Ukraine to end the hostilities have essentially ground to a halt.

Russia's lead negotiator Vladimir Medinsky said yesterday that Russia was willing to resume negotiations but the onus was on Kyiv.

"Freezing the current negotiations and putting everything on pause is not our initiative," Mr Rudenko said.

"We will be ready to resume as soon as Ukraine shows a constructive position and at least provides a reaction to the proposals submitted to it."

Talks between Russian and Ukrainian delegations have been held regularly, both in person and via video-link, since the Russian military offensive began on February 24.

The Ukrainian and Russian foreign ministers met for inconclusive talks in Turkey in March, followed by a meeting of the delegations in Istanbul, which also failed to bring about concrete results.

(Except for the headline, this story has not been edited by NDTV staff and is published from a syndicated feed.)

Waiting for response to load...

Read the original here:
"Looking Over The Italy Peace Plan To End War In Ukraine": Russia - NDTV