Archive for the ‘Ukraine’ Category

Russia is facing severe sanctions for Ukraine threats. Heres what that could mean – Globalnews.ca

Growing tensions between Moscow and Western powers have raised the prospect of new sanctions being imposed on Russia, possibly the most severe yet, if it attacks neighboring Ukraine.

U.S. Senate Democrats have unveiled a bill to impose sweeping sanctions on the Russian government and military officials including President Vladimir Putin as well as Russian banking institutions if Moscow engages in hostilities against Ukraine.

If Russia is using its conventional military to acquire land in Ukraine, that will meet a severe economic response, a senior White House official said on Wednesday.

Russia has massed tens of thousands of troops near Ukraines borders in what Kyiv and its allies fear could be preparation for a new military offensive.

Story continues below advertisement

Russia, which denies planning to attack Ukraine, has been subject to sanctions since its 2014 annexation of Crimea from its neighbor. Further punitive measures were added after a former Russian spy was poisoned in Britain in 2018 and following an investigation into alleged Russian meddling in the 2016 U.S. presidential election won by Donald Trump.

Russia has denied any role in the poisoning of ex-spy Yuri Skripal and his daughter, and denies trying to interfere in foreign elections.

Here are some ways financial sanctions could target Russia.

Sanctions could target semiconductor chips

The White House has told the U.S. chip industry to be prepared for new restrictions on exports to Russia if Moscow attacks Ukraine, sources said.

This includes potentially blocking the countrys access to global electronics supplies.

Story continues below advertisement

Similar measures were deployed during the Cold War, when the United States and other Western nations maintained severe technology sanctions on the Soviet Union, keeping it technologically backward and crimping growth.

Sanctions could hit Russia's big banks, assets

The United States and the European Union already have sanctions on Russias energy, financial and defense sectors.

The White House is floating the idea of curbs on Russias biggest banks and has previously mooted measures targeting Moscows ability to convert roubles into dollars and other currencies. Washington could also target the state-backed Russian Direct Investment Fund.

Sanctions applied to individual firms often cause sector-wide pain, according to former U.S. State Department economist Mark Stone, as they make investors worry that the curbs will be widened or that they will be unable to differentiate.

Story continues below advertisement

Sanctioning all transactions with Russian banks and freezing assets would be more impactful and more targeted than a cut-off from the SWIFT global messaging system, said Brian OToole, a fellow at the Atlantic Council think tank.

Targeting Russias access to SWIFT, which is widely used in international financial transactions, would become useful really only following broad financial sanctions by the United States, Britain and the European Union, OToole said.

Trending Stories

Sanctions could zero in on individuals with bans, freezes

Sanctioning individuals via asset freezes and travel bans is a commonly used tool and can sometimes resonate widely.

Britain imposed sanctions in April 2021 on 14 Russians under a new law giving the UK government the power to penalize those it says are credibly involved in the most serious corruption abroad.

Story continues below advertisement

The bill unveiled last week by Senate Democrats foresees sweeping sanctions on top Russian government and military officials, including Putin.

Kremlins spokesman Dmitry Peskov said the idea of imposing sanctions on the Russian president would be tantamount to severing relations between Moscow and Washington.

Sanctions could target access to SWIFT

One of the harshest measures would be to disconnect the Russian financial system from SWIFT.

SWIFT, used by more than 11,000 financial institutions in over 200 countries, is a Belgium-based cooperative governed by a 25-member board, including Eddie Astanin, chairman of Russias Central Counterparty Clearing Centre (NCC).

There is a precedent: In March 2012, SWIFT disconnected Iranian banks as international sanctions tightened against Tehran over its nuclear program a move that saw the country lose half its oil export revenues and 30 per cent of foreign trade, according to think tank Carnegie Moscow Center.

Story continues below advertisement

Irans economy is smaller and not as linked-up internationally as the Russian economy, whose interconnectedness with the West has worked as a shield.

The United States and Germany would stand to lose the most, as their banks are the most frequent SWIFT users with Russian banks, according to Maria Shagina at the Carnegie Moscow Center.

Calls to cut Russias SWIFT access were mooted in 2014 when Moscow annexed Crimea, prompting Moscow to develop an alternative messaging system, SPFS.

The number of messages sent via SPFS reached around 2 million, or one-fifth of Russian internal traffic, in 2020, according to the central bank, which aims to increase this to 30 per cent in 2023. However, the SPFS system, which has size limits on messages and is operational only on weekdays, has had a hard time picking up foreign members, Shagina wrote in a 2021 paper.

The Atlantic Councils OToole said cutting Russia off from SWIFT would cause immediate disruption but the impact would diminish over time.

Story continues below advertisement

Some payments would be delayed and there may be increased cost in making new ones, but broadly speaking there is unlikely to be a massive collapse of Russian trade so long as that trade remains legal/not sanctioned, OToole said.

Russian bonds may also face curbs

Access to Russian bonds has become increasingly restricted and curbs could be tightened further, with a ban on secondary market participation floated as one option.

In April 2021, U.S. President Joe Biden banned U.S. investors buying new Russian rouble bonds OFZs as they are known over accusations of election meddling.

Sanctions imposed in 2015 made future Russian dollar debt ineligible for many investors and indexes such as JPMorgans EMBI Global.

Those measures have cut Russias external debt by 33 per cent since early 2014 from $733 billion to $489 billion in the third quarter of 2021.

Story continues below advertisement

Lower debt improves a countrys balance sheet on the surface, but deprives it of financing sources that could contribute to economic growth and development.

See more here:
Russia is facing severe sanctions for Ukraine threats. Heres what that could mean - Globalnews.ca

Understanding the Russia-Ukraine crisis | Stanford News – Stanford University News

By stepping up its military presence along the Ukrainian border, Russian President Vladimir Putin hopes that Ukraine and the West will make concessions and Ukraine will realign itself back to Moscow, says Stanford scholar Steven Pifer. But nothing has alienated Ukraine more than Kremlin policy over the past eight years, particularly Russias military seizure of Crimea in 2014 and its role in the Donbas conflict that has claimed more than 13,000 lives, he said.

Stever Pifer (Image credit: Damian M. Marhefka)

Here, Pifer, the William J. Perry Fellow at Stanfords Center for International Security and Cooperation (CISAC), discusses what Putin hopes to accomplish by amassing military troops along the Ukrainian border and why Ukraines democratic ambitions pose such a threat to Russias authoritarian leader.

Pifers research focuses on nuclear arms control, Ukraine, Russia and European security. Pifer spent more than 25 years working with the U.S. State Department, where he focused on Americas relations with the former Soviet Union and Europe, as well as arms control and security issues. He served as deputy assistant secretary of state in the Bureau of European and Eurasian Affairs with responsibilities for Russia and Ukraine (2001-2004), ambassador to Ukraine (1998-2000), and special assistant to the president and senior director for Russia, Ukraine and Eurasia on the National Security Council (1996-1997).

How likely is it that Putin will start a war with Ukraine?

The short answer: We dont know. It may well be that Mr. Putin has not yet decided. The Kremlin undoubtedly hopes that just the threat of a new attack on Ukraine will prompt Kyiv [the Ukrainian capital city] and the West to make concessions.

I believe the costs to Russia of attacking Ukraine would significantly outweigh the benefits. However, Mr. Putin seems to operate on a different logic, and officials in Washington and European capitals have expressed real alarm about the prospect of Russian military action. Western officials would be wise to assume the worst and do everything they can to try to dissuade the Kremlin from war.

What does Putin hope to achieve by amassing a strong military presence along the Ukrainian border?

Ideally, Mr. Putin wants Kyiv to abandon its Western course and turn back to Moscow. However, nothing has done more to push Ukraine away from Russia and toward the West than Russian policy over the past eight years, in particular, Russias seizure of Crimea and its role in the conflict in Donbas that has claimed more than 13,000 lives. As a result, more and more Ukrainians see membership in institutions such as the European Union and NATO as necessary for their security.

Mr. Putin also wants NATO to rethink policies, such as enlargement and the deployment of relatively small battlegroups on the territory of Poland and the Baltic states. Nothing suggests that NATO will make those changes.

What diplomatic options are available to prevent conflict from escalating further? Biden has warned Russia with economic sanctions should they take any further military action Ukraine. Is this enough of a deterrent?

The Biden administration has responded to the crisis with a mix of deterrence and dialogue. It has spelled out the costs that would ensue if Russia attacks Ukraine punishing new sanctions, more military assistance to Kyiv and a stronger NATO military presence in member states near Russia, to say nothing of the casualties the Ukrainians would inflict on Russian troops. At the same time, the administration has expressed a readiness to discuss Russian concerns, making clear that Western and Ukrainian concerns about Russian behavior must also be addressed.

Mr. Putin has demanded security guarantees for Russia, a bit ironic since Russia has the worlds largest nuclear arsenal and the most powerful conventional military in Europe. In mid-December, the Russian foreign ministry proposed draft NATO-Russia and U.S.-Russia agreements incorporating those demands. Many provisions in those agreements are unacceptable, as the Russian officials who drafted them undoubtedly knew. Other elements could offer a basis for discussion and even negotiation, if Moscow is prepared to address reciprocal concerns.

The big question about the draft agreements: Does the Kremlin regard them as an opening bid in what would be a serious and complex negotiation, or does the Kremlin seek rejection, which it could then add to its list of pretexts for assaulting Ukraine? We dont yet know.

As the former ambassador to Ukraine and a scholar of the region, what do you think leaders in the Kremlin misunderstand about Ukraine, its people and its desire for sovereignty?

Mr. Putin apparently does not understand the desire of Ukrainians to live in a sovereign state and to choose their own course. He regularly refers to Russians and Ukrainians as one people, which is an utterly tone-deaf comment that many Ukrainians hear as a denial of their culture, history and language. The Kremlins lack of understanding is one factor that has resulted in a policy that has produced a major strategic failure for Russia; it has pushed Ukraine away and fueled great animosity there toward the Russian state.

How has Russias military seizure of Crimea transformed diplomatic relations in the region and with the world at large, especially the U.S., the EU and NATO?

Russias illegal seizure of Crimea in 2014 was the biggest land grab in Europe since World War II, and it violated many commitments that Russia had made to respect Ukraines territorial integrity. The Kremlin then provoked and supported, in some cases with regular units of the Russian army, the conflict in Donbas. Those actions had major negative repercussions for Russias relations with the West, and the West reacted. For example, the United States and Europe coordinated on sanctions targeting the Russian economy. NATO, which had drawn down its military power since the early 1990s, reversed course; member states agreed to increase their defense spending, with a target of 2 percent of gross domestic product by 2024. Moreover, NATO began deploying ground forces in member states on its eastern flank.

Next week will see talks between Russian and U.S. officials on Jan. 10, a NATO-Russia convening on Jan. 12, and a meeting of the Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe (OSCE) on Jan. 13. How do you anticipate discussions about Ukraine unfolding at these events? What would make these discussions successful?

The Russia-Ukraine crisis and broader European security issues will come up in all three meetings. When U.S. officials meet their Russian counterparts, they will undoubtedly discuss these issues but will insist there can be no negotiations about European security or Ukraine without Europeans and Ukrainians at the table. U.S. officials will also make clear that Russia needs to de-escalate the military situation. NATO allies will all be taking part in the meeting with Russian officials on Jan. 12. The Jan. 13 OSCE meeting will be the one in which all relevant parties, particularly the Ukrainians, are present.

Following those meetings, Russian officials should return to Moscow with a good sense for which parts of their draft agreements could provide a basis for negotiation and which are non-starters. That gets back to the big question: Does the Kremlin intend its draft agreements as an opening bid in a negotiating process in which its extreme demands will not be met, or does it want a rejection to add to its narrative for war?

Is there anything else you would like to add?

Moscow has sought to frame this crisis as one between Russia and NATO, but the Kremlins primary focus is Ukraine. This is partly about geopolitics and Moscows desire for a sphere of influence in the post-Soviet space. However, it is also very much about Russian domestic politics. A Ukraine that charts its own course, consolidates its democracy and enacts reforms that realize the full potential of its economy poses a nightmare for the Kremlin: That Ukraine would cause Russians to ask why they cannot have the same political voice as Ukrainian citizens and perhaps even challenge Mr. Putins authoritarianism.

See more here:
Understanding the Russia-Ukraine crisis | Stanford News - Stanford University News

Poroshenko vows to return to Ukraine on Jan 17 – Ukrinform. Ukraine and world news

European Solidarity party leader and former Ukrainian President Petro Poroshenko has said that he will return to Kyiv on January 17.

"As I promised, I will return to Kyiv on January 17 to show up in court and meet with the prosecutor general, using my right of a people's deputy," Poroshenko wrote on Facebook.

Before that, on January 10-15, he said he would "work in Europe to protect Ukraine from Russian aggression and support democracy in our country," adding that despite a long holiday season, much needs to be done to step up Western support for Ukraine.

Poroshenko earlier announced that he would return to Ukraine from a foreign trip in the first half of January. He left abroad on December 17.

On December 20, Acting Prosecutor General Oleksiy Symonenko signed a notice of suspicion for Poroshenko in the case of coal supplies from the occupied territories.

Kyiv's Pechersky District Court received a petition requiring that Poroshenko be remanded in custody.

According to Ukraine's State Bureau of Investigation, Poroshenko is suspected of "aiding the activities of the terrorist organizations 'LPR' and 'DPR' by acting in collusion with a group of individuals, including representatives of the top leadership of the Russian Federation."

In September-November 2021, an incumbent MP and a former energy minister were declared suspects in the case.

They are suspected of buying coal from non-government-controlled areas in Donetsk and Luhansk regions using state funds. According to the investigation, through their actions they made Ukraine's energy sector dependent on Russia and terrorist organizations, which, in turn, undermined the economic security of the state in 2014-2015, depriving it of any opportunities for diversification of energy sources and providing Russia with greater opportunities for further interference in the internal affairs of Ukraine and subversive activities against the country.

op

Go here to read the rest:
Poroshenko vows to return to Ukraine on Jan 17 - Ukrinform. Ukraine and world news

The ‘mystery’ of the missing Ukraine ambassador – Politico

The Embassy of the United States of America is pictured on Oct. 1, 2019 in Kyiv, Ukraine. | Sean Gallup/Getty Images

With help from Daniel Lippman

Send tips | Subscribe here | Email Alex | Email Quint

Nearly a full year into JOE BIDENs presidency, the U.S. ambassadors chair in Kyiv remains empty and WTF-laden whispers are swirling around Washington.

On Tuesday, a reporter asked White House press secretary JEN PSAKI why Biden had yet to tap someone. Psaki responded that the president absolutely plans to offer a name, but [j]ust like any position, hes always looking to find the right person to nominate to fill the role an important one.

Still, our contacts remain puzzled and frustrated about why its taking so long, especially as Russian President VLADIMIR PUTIN threatens a renewed invasion of its neighbor. Even some of the most Ukraine-focused lawmakers are in the dark about the nomination, a sign that the right person hasnt been found yet.

Ive continuously raised to State Department officials the urgent need for this post to be filled in Ukraine, Sen. JEANNE SHAHEEN (D-N.H.), chair of the Senate Foreign Relations Subcommittee on Europe and Regional Security Cooperation, told NatSec Daily. Putins persistent provocations along the Ukraine border and increasing belligerence underscore the importance of having a U.S. ambassador seated in Kyiv to support our Ukrainian partners at this critical moment.

It is a mystery why no one has been named, said WILLIAM TAYLOR, a former U.S. ambassador to Ukraine now at the U.S. Institute of Peace. Its inexplicable, and his high-level contacts in the administration cannot give me an answer.

I asked as recently as Monday, he told NatSec Daily.

The name most often floated for the role is BRIDGET BRINK, a seasoned veteran of the Foreign Service whos currently the U.S. ambassador to Slovakia. A less-mentioned option is GEOFFREY PYATT, now Americas ambassador in Greece who led the Ukraine mission from 2013 to 2016. And STEVEN PIFER, a former U.S. ambassador in Ukraine, told us that the current charg daffaires in Kyiv, KRISTINA KVIEN, is doing a superb job. Why not nominate her? (Taylor enthusiastically agreed with this suggestion.)

I can think of several other career Foreign Service officers who would make excellent nominees. This is an oversight the administration should correct as soon as possible, Pifer continued in an email. After all, its been more than two years since the U.S. last had a Senate-confirmed ambassador in Ukraine when President DONALD TRUMP removed MARIE YOVANOVITCH over umm policy disagreements.

A senior administration official said nothing nefarious is going on here: the delay simply stems from the Biden teams careful, deliberative process.

In other words (not theirs), its either indecision or the pains of bureaucracy.

Others have their own theories. One is that the administration didnt want a pick to languish during a historic block of nominees by Republican Senators, potentially giving GOP lawmakers leverage in the standoff over Nord Stream 2 policy. (Sen. TED CRUZ, however, has called on Biden to fast-track a Ukraine ambassador.)

Another is that Biden's team has struggled to find a career diplomat capable enough to handle a tough portfolio but still wants to keep their promise of minimizing political appointees in key posts.

Whatever the reason, no one disputes that taking a year to name an ambassador to Ukraine is exceedingly long, in Taylors words.

[I]n this case the Biden administration has only itself to blame, former top U.S. diplomats DAVID KRAMER and JOHN HERBST wrote in a Tuesday Washington Post op-ed. Failing to arrange for an ambassador in Kyiv is not just a bad way to conduct foreign policy. It also indicates the administrations disrespect however unintentional for Ukraine.

Asked for comment, the State Department referred us to the White House. The NSC pointed us to Psakis remarks.

FIRST IN NATSEC DAILY USAGM CONSIDERING CUBA BROADCASTING DOWNSIZE: The U.S. Agency for Global Media is looking into a potential downsizing of its Office of Cuba Broadcasting, per our own DANIEL LIPPMAN, its hands forced by an ever-shrinking budget.

Yesterday USAGM notified Congress of its intention to evaluate a potential Reduction-in-Force (RIF) within the OCB through consultation with experts within the Office of Personnel Management, UASGM said in a statement to Lippman. USAGM and OCB leadership continue to explore all options for cost reductions without compromising the ability to achieve its mission, including personnel reductions, to operate within the funding levels set by the Congress in recent years and to meet the Presidents 2022 budget request for OCB of $13m.

The budget for OCB has seen a steady decline in recent years, with the office spending nearly $29 million in fiscal year 2019, then almost $25 million in 2020 and nearly $20 million in 2021. As a result, USAGMs acting CEO, KELU CHAO, informed Sen. CHRIS COONS (D-Del.) of the push for workforce shaping services in a Tuesday letter.

The move is likely to face stiff bipartisan resistance by some on the Hill, even though OCB has provided some taxpayer-funded embarassments, such as an anti-Semitic segment.

As OCB undergoes reforms, now is not the time to cut critical services supporting the free flow of information into and out of the island, Sen. BOB MENENDEZ (D-N.J.), chair of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, told Lippman. I will ensure that any restructuring and staffing decisions dont undermine the work of Radio and TV Marti, or the new technologies and internet freedom tools from the Office of Cuba Broadcasting.

Its outrageous that the Biden administration wants to cut funds for Radio and TV Mart, a critical and independent source of information in support of democracy and Cubans on the island. Its shameful and embarrassing, especially following last years historic protests. My office is in contact with USAGM and I will do everything I can to prevent this unjustified cut, said Sen. MARCO RUBIO (R-Fla.), a longtime critic of the Cuba regime.

NORTH KOREA LAUNCHES MISSILE: The U.S. Indo-Pacific Command has confirmed North Koreas firing of a ballistic missile Wednesday, a launch which comes after leader KIM JONG UN pledged at a ruling party conference last week to further strengthen Pyongyangs military capability.

While we have assessed that this event does not pose an immediate threat to U.S. personnel or territory, or to our allies, the ballistic missile launch highlights the destabilizing impact of the DPRKs illicit weapons program, U.S. INDOPACOM said in a statement. The U.S. commitment to the defense of the Republic of Korea and Japan remains ironclad.

Other Indo-Pacific powers also weighed in on the launch North Koreas first in roughly two months. South Korean Defense Minister SUH WOOK said the launch is seen as part of North Koreas military buildup, but that South Korea is analyzing whether it had any political intention, per The Associated Press HYUNG-JIN KIM.

In Japan, Prime Minister KISHIDA FUMIO said it is truly regrettable that North Korea has continued to fire missiles since last year. And as for China, Foreign Ministry spokesperson WANG WENBIN said all parties concerned should keep in mind the big picture [and] be cautious with their words and actions.

ISRAELS MIL INTEL CHIEF FAVORS IRAN DEAL: Axios BARAK RAVID reports that Israels military intelligence chief, Maj. Gen. AHARON HALIVA, told the countrys Security Cabinet Sunday that Jerusalem would be better off if the Iran deal remained intact.

Haliva, who was appointed as the head of military intelligence in October, told the Cabinet that a deal in Vienna would serve Israels interests by providing increased certainty about the limitations on Iran's nuclear program, and it would buy more time for Israel to prepare for escalation scenarios, Ravid reported. Furthermore, two Cabinet members including Foreign Minister YAIR LAPID said Israel shouldnt criticize the Biden administration openly should a deal be reached in the coming weeks.

"It will be a big surprise if some kind of deal doesnt emerge from Vienna," a senior Israeli official told Ravid.

The Axios reporter also wrote that national security adviser JAKE SULLIVAN told his Israeli counterparts on Dec. 22 in Jerusalem that the threat of snapback sanctions should be used if Iran pushes toward weapons-grade uranium.

Sullivan said in the U.S.-Israel meeting that if no agreement is reached in Vienna within weeks and the Iranians aren't negotiating in good faith, the U.S. should walk away from the talks, the Israeli officials said, Ravid added.

A message from Lockheed Martin:

Our mission is to prepare you for the future by engineering advanced capabilities today, so you can protect what matters most.

Many of todays military systems and platforms were designed to operate in a different technological era and are behind the digital connectivity found in everyday life. Through our 21st Century Warfare vision, Lockheed Martin is accelerating the adoption of leading-edge networking and related technologies into our national defense enterprise, while enhancing the performance of our major platforms to provide unmatched situational awareness, command and control across land, sea, air, space and cyber. Learn More

HORN OF AFRICA ENVOY TO RESIGN: JEFFREY FELTMAN will step down as U.S. Special Envoy for the Horn of Africa and be replaced by DAVID SATTERFIELD, the outgoing U.S. ambassador to Turkey, according to Reuters HUMEYRA PAMUK.

Feltmans decision to resign after more than nine months on the job comes as the veteran diplomat remains engulfed in U.S. efforts to resolve Ethiopias civil war; he is scheduled to travel to the country yet again Thursday. Since assuming the special envoy post last April, Feltman also has dealt with the fallout from Sudans military coup last October.

Per Reuters, Feltman took the role with an intention to serve for less than a year, a source familiar with the matter said. The source said Satterfield will provide continued U.S. focus, necessary because of ongoing instability and inter-connected challenges in the region.

U.S. SANCTIONS BALKAN LEADER: The Treasury Departments Office of Foreign Assets Control has designated MILORAD DODIK, one of the three members of the presidency of Bosnia and Herzegovina, and a media platform under his control in response to Dodiks corrupt activities and continued threats to the stability and territorial integrity of the southern European nation.

In a news release, the department accused Dodik of undermining his countrys institutions by calling for the seizure of state competencies, as well as by using his official position to accumulate personal wealth through graft, bribery, and other forms of corruption.

Dodiks divisive ethno-nationalistic rhetoric reflects his efforts to advance these political goals and distract attention from his corrupt activities, the department charged. Cumulatively, these actions threaten the stability, sovereignty, and territorial integrity of [Bosnia and Herzegovina] and undermine the Dayton Peace Accords, thereby risking wider regional instability.

MOST OHIO GOP CANDIDATES AGAINST 2SS: Five of the six candidates vying for the Ohio Republican Senate nomination refused to endorse a two-state solution for Israelis and Palestinians should they eventually get the job, Jewish Insiders MATTHEW KASSEL reports.

Out of six candidates who submitted answers to a range of questions, just one, former GOP state party chair JANE TIMKEN, directly endorsed a two-state solution, even as she put forth caveats. Others, including State Sen. MATT DOLAN and Cleveland businessmen BERNIE MORENO and MIKE GIBBONS, suggested favoring the approach in theory but were pessimistic about the possibility or desirability of pursuing negotiations at present. J.D. VANCE, the Hillbilly Elegy author and venture capitalist, was largely ambivalent and said he would defer to Israel on the matter. Former Ohio State Treasurer JOSH MANDEL went a step further than his opponents, rejecting the idea entirely a position that few Republicans have been willing to adopt publicly, Kassel wrote.

The survey results are yet another sign of the Republican Partys turn away from a long-standing and bipartisan American policy, stemming largely from the Trump administrations rejection of it.

IT'S WEDNESDAY: Thanks for tuning in to NatSec Daily. This space is reserved for the top U.S. and foreign officials, the lawmakers, the lobbyists, the experts and the people like you who care about how the natsec sausage gets made. Aim your tips and comments at [emailprotected] and [emailprotected], and follow us on Twitter at @alexbward and @QuintForgey.

While youre at it, follow the rest of POLITICOs national security team: @nahaltoosi, @woodruffbets, @politicoryan, @PhelimKine, @BryanDBender, @laraseligman, @connorobrienNH, @paulmccleary, @leehudson, and @AndrewDesiderio.

KAZAKHSTAN IN CHAOS: Kazakhstani President KASSYM-JOMART TOKAYEV threatened to act as toughly as possible to quash protests across the Central Asian nation, shortly after accepting the governments resignation and introducing a state of emergency in several provinces, report The Guardians SHAUN WALKER and NAUBET BISENOV.

Also on Wednesday, Kazakhtelecom, the countrys largest telecommunications company, shut off the internet as protesters first mobilized last weekend after a sharp increase in fuel prices continued to clash with law enforcement. The presidential residence in Almaty, Kazakhstans largest city, was engulfed in flames, while armed demonstrators stormed another government building, per the AP.

Walker and Bisenov note that the images of Kazakhstani police being overpowered by protesters are likely to cause alarm in the Kremlin, as another country neighbouring Russia succumbs to political unrest. Kazakhstan is part of an economic union with Russia and the two countries share a long border. Tokayev has reportedly asked Putin for military assistance to squash the protests, but the troops that might be called upon to assist currently are busy just outside Ukraine.

KATIE PUTZ, a managing editor at The Diplomat and an expert on Central Asia, tweeted that the demonstrations were long in the making: The current protests in Kazakhstan definitely qualify as unprecedented in scale & timing [but] the protests in 2016 and 2019 in KZ were precursors and, for the authorities, missed off-ramps.

FRANCE OPENS TERROR PROBE AFTER SAUDI ARABIA BLAST: Prosecutors in France are opening a terrorism investigation into the explosion last week at the Dakar Rally race in Saudi Arabia that wounded PHILIPPE BOUTRON, the French driver of a support vehicle for the Sodicars Racing team, per BBC News.

Boutrons vehicle was damaged by the blast as it left a hotel near Jeddahs international airport just two days before the start of the race. Boutron suffered serious leg injuries and was placed in a medically-induced coma after being repatriated to France. Another five French citizens who also were in the vehicle were unharmed.

French anti-terrorism prosecutors have announced a preliminary investigation into multiple attempted killings in connection with a terrorist group, and the French foreign ministry has warned its citizens in Saudi Arabia to exercise maximum vigilance following the explosion.

ISRAELS CYBER CHIEF STEPS DOWN: YIGAL UNNA, head of the Israel National Cyber Directorate, will step down from his role after four years in charge, The Jerusalem Posts YONAH JEREMY BOB reports.

Unna was the third leader of Israels cyber agency, but the first with defensive and other broad powers previously held by the Shin Bet.

It has been a great and rare honor to serve the State of Israel and to protect its security, Unna said. Our fundamental mission of defending critical infrastructure was fully realized. Despite the drastic and escalating efforts by different [cyber] attackers, we succeeded at blocking thousands of cyber attacks in time and before they caused broad damage to the civilian sector.

There is currently no planned successor for Unna, so his deputy will lead the agency for the time being.

NAVY COMPLETES UNMANNED MINESWEEPER TRIAL: Naval Sea Systems Command successfully completed a shock test of its new unmanned minesweeper, moving the surface vessel one step closer to full use this year.

The test demonstrates the survivability of the Unmanned Influence Sweep System, LCS Mission Modules Program Manager Capt. GODFREY GUS WEEKES said in a news release.

Capable of being hosted from littoral combat ships (LCS), operated from shore, or vessels of opportunity, UISS provides acoustic and magnetic minesweeping coupled with the unmanned, semi-autonomous, diesel-powered, aluminum-hulled mine countermeasures unmanned surface vehicle (MCM USV), the release continued.

The UISS is projected to replace the Navys aging Avenger-class minesweeping ships and MH-53Es Sea Dragon helicopters.

A message from Lockheed Martin:

Our mission is to prepare you for the future by engineering advanced capabilities today, so you can protect what matters most.

For generations, customers have counted on Lockheed Martin to help them overcome their most complex challenges. To align with the priorities of our customers in the decades ahead, Lockheed Martin has developed a concept for accelerating American and allied military modernization and preserving global deterrence called 21st Century Warfare.

Many of todays military systems and platforms were designed to operate in a different technological era and are behind the digital connectivity found in everyday life. Through our 21st Century Warfare vision, Lockheed Martin is accelerating the adoption of leading-edge networking and related technologies into our national defense enterprise, while enhancing the performance of our major platforms.

With a portfolio that spans every branch of the military, Lockheed Martins unique insights into enabling joint all-domain operations helps us build the technologies that enable unmatched situational awareness, command and control across all domains. Learn More

CAPITOL SECURITY OFFICIALS REVEAL POST-INSURRECTION REFORMS: The Capitol Police Board has laid out a lengthy list of reforms that it says have changed the way law enforcement will protect congressional lawmakers in the aftermath of last years violence on Jan. 6, per our own NICHOLAS WU and KYLE CHENEY.

But the boards 10-page report also addressed what it described as the Capitol Polices biggest challenge: a staffing shortage of roughly 447 officers. The fastest option to fix that problem, according to the report, involves contracting private security officers in posts where a Capitol Police officer might not be necessary or where the department needs a tactical advantage.

In addition, the report states that Capitol Police are close to completing a nationwide search for an intelligence chief. And in a call with lawmakers Tuesday, Capitol Police Chief J. THOMAS MANGER and House Sergeant at Arms WILLIAM WALKER detailed some other proposals under consideration such as enhanced screening for Capitol visitors, similar to the White Houses system, as well as plans to beef up security at entrance checkpoints.

Meanwhile, the White House concluded that a lack of high-level intelligence sharing and imagination of how bad the protest could be led to the horrific scenes last January, per The Washington Posts DEVLIN BARRETT, ASHLEY PARKER and AARON DAVIS.

SECRET AFGHANISTAN BRIEFING: Defense Secretary LLOYD AUSTIN and Secretary of State ANTONY BLINKEN will privately brief members of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee next week on the administrations Afghanistan policy, the panel announced.

The briefing, which will be conducted in a secret Senate facility, will touch upon continuing evacuation efforts, terrorist gains in the country and the Talibans rule.

EXPERTS SLAM OVER-THE-HORIZON PLAN: The Biden administrations over-the-horizon capabilities in Afghanistan and elsewhere around the globe are unlikely to yield any strategic victory in combating terrorism in the long term, TORE HAMMING and COLIN P. CLARKE write in Foreign Policy savaging the presidents preferred tactic for exerting American military force in the Middle East.

Hamming and Clarke pinpoint two key analytic flaws in the over-the-horizon strategy. First is the issue of intelligence collection to inform kinetic operations. Human sources, they argue, minimize the risk of flawed information if managed correctly. Furthermore, the errant drone attack in Kabul last August will likely prompt the Pentagon to be more hesitant in ordering similar strikes in the future resulting in a reticence to strike terrorist networks as they reconstitute, ceding the advantage to violent extremists as they seek to recruit, recuperate, and rearm.

Second, Hamming and Clarke highlight the dubious effectiveness of leadership decapitation, or the targeting of principal figures in militant Islamic networks during the past two decades. While losing a leader or a key network hub may represent a setback for a group, they write, history shows that those individuals over time are replaced. The strategy also runs the very real risk of helping militants to recruit and mobilize, using collateral damage to further their cause and rally the population to their side.

NATHAN SALES has joined the Soufan Group as a senior adviser. During the Trump administration, Sales was the acting undersecretary of State for civilian security, democracy, and human rights as well as the ambassador-at-large and coordinator for counterterrorism.

KELLY GRIECO has joined the Atlantic Councils Scowcroft Center for Strategy and Security as a senior fellow within the New American Engagement Initiative. She previously was an assistant professor at the Air Command and Staff College, Air University, where she also served as a course director for war theory and the director of instruction in international security.

DAVID FRUM, The Atlantic: How to Disable Putins Energy Weapon

TOM OCONNOR and NAVEED JAMALI, Newsweek: A Year After 1/6, Ukraine's War Draws U.S. Far-Right to Fight Russia, Train for Violence at Home

KEJAL VYAS, The Wall Street Journal: Venezuelas U.S.-Backed Opposition Frays as Nicols Maduro Tightens Grip

The president and the vice president will deliver remarks to mark one year since the Jan. 6 Capitol insurrection, per the White House.

The Intelligence and National Security Alliance, 9 a.m.: Coffee and Conversation With MARK ANDRESS

The Brookings Institution, 10 a.m.: The January 6 Insurrection: One Year Later with KATIE BENNER, SEAMUS HUGHES, QUINTA JURECIC, ROGER PARLOFF and BENJAMIN WITTES

The Atlantic Council, 11 a.m.: What Is Russias Endgame in Ukraine? with WESLEY CLARK, OLEKSANDR DANYLIUK, EVELYN FARKAS, MELINDA HARING, JOHN HERBST and HARLAN ULLMAN

The Middle East Institute, 11 a.m.: The Future of Maritime Security in the Gulf and the Red Sea with CINZIA BIANCO, KEVIN DONEGAN, SASKIA M. VAN GENUGTEN, MIRETTE F. MABROUK and BILAL Y. SAAB

The Jewish Democratic Council of America, 12 p.m.: One Year Later: Reflecting on Trumps Insurrection and the State of Our Democracy with SHARON BROUS, BEN CARDIN, MIKE LEVIN, KATHY MANNING, BRAD SCHNEIDER, DEBBIE WASSERMAN SCHULTZ and SUSAN WILD

New America, 12 p.m.: Mapping the Capitol Attack and Its Aftermath: Tech, Extremism and Jan. 6 with BEN DALTON, RYAN GOODMAN, JUSTIN HENDRIX, SHANNON HILLER, JARED HOLT, MARY MCCORD, CANDACE RONDEAUX, SHAWN WALKER and ERIC WARD

CNN, 8 p.m.: Live from the Capitol: January 6th, One Year Later with LIZ CHENEY, JASON CROW, HARRY DUNN, VERONICA ESCOBAR, MICHAEL FANONE, RUBEN GALLEGO, AQUILINO GONELL, DANIEL HODGES, DAN KILDEE, NANCY PELOSI, JAMIE RASKIN, LISA BLUNT ROCHESTER, BENNIE THOMPSON and SUSAN WILD

Have a natsec-centric event coming up? Transitioning to a new defense-adjacent or foreign policy-focused gig? Shoot us an email at [emailprotected] or [emailprotected] to be featured in the next edition of the newsletter.

And thanks to our editor, Ben Pauker, whos upset hes not on the Ukraine ambassador shortlist.

Continue reading here:
The 'mystery' of the missing Ukraine ambassador - Politico

U.S. embassy congratulates Ukraine church on third anniversary of autocephaly – Ukrinform. Ukraine and world news

The U.S. Embassy in Kyiv has congratulated the Orthodox Church of Ukraine on the third anniversary of receiving a tomos of autocephaly.

According to Ukrinform, the embassy announced this on Twitter.

"Congratulations to the Orthodox Church of Ukraine on the third anniversary of receiving the Tomos of Autocephaly! Ukrainians should be free to worship as they choose, without external influence," the embassy said.

Today, January 6, marks the third anniversary of the granting of a tomos of autocephaly to the Orthodox Church of Ukraine.

On April 19, 2018, the Verkhovna Rada endorsed the appeal to the Archbishop of Constantinople, Ecumenical Patriarch Bartholomew, with a request to issue a tomos of autocephaly of the Orthodox Church in Ukraine.

On October 11, the Holy Synod of the Ecumenical Patriarchate decided to grant a tomos of autocephaly to the Orthodox Church in Ukraine.

On December 15, 2018, the Unification Council took place at St. Sophia Cathedral in Kyiv. The clergy of the Ukrainian Orthodox Church-Kyiv Patriarchate, the Ukrainian Autocephalous Orthodox Church, and representatives of the Ukrainian Orthodox Church-Moscow Patriarchate created a single local Orthodox Church of Ukraine, approving its charter and electing its primate - Metropolitan Epiphanius of Kyiv and All Ukraine.

op

Excerpt from:
U.S. embassy congratulates Ukraine church on third anniversary of autocephaly - Ukrinform. Ukraine and world news