Archive for the ‘Ukraine’ Category

Why giving Ukraine lethal weapons would be a massive mistake – Washington Post

By Charles Kupchan By Charles Kupchan August 7 at 11:43 AM

Charles A. Kupchan, a professor of international affairs at Georgetown University and a senior fellow at the Council on Foreign Relations, served on the National Security Council from 2014 to 2017.

The Trump administration is in the midst of making a decision on whether to transfer lethal weaponry to Ukraine. This potential move is intended to give Ukraines military the ability to impose new costs on the Russians and their proxies engaged in a separatist revolt in the countrys eastern region of Donbass, thereby persuading the Kremlin to give up the fight.

But the result would likely be the opposite an escalation in the conflict that would lead to further losses of Ukraines territory and compromise its political stability. Russia enjoys insurmountable military superiority over Ukraine. The United States should not encourage Ukraine to engage in an escalatory confrontation with Russia. Washington knows full well that Ukraine cannot prevail.

The urge to give Ukraine lethal arms most likely in the form of anti-tank weapons is understandable. Since 2014, the Russians have occupied and illegally annexed Crimea and sustained a separatist rebellion in Donbass that has claimed more than 10,000 lives. Moreover, Russia has engaged in these acts of aggression in order to block Ukraines desire to leave Moscows sphere of influence and join the community of Western democracies.

Under these circumstances, the United States should continue helping Ukrainians defend themselves by assisting with defense reforms and training Ukrainian forces. So why not take the next step and give Ukraine lethal weapons?

For starters, the notion that Russian President Vladimir Putin would give up his hold on Donbass if a few more Russians come home in body bags is to dramatically misread the Kremlin. Putin is a master at manipulating the Russian public, especially when it comes to the Ukraine conflict and would hardly fold his hand if Russian casualties were to increase.

On the contrary, he would likely double down, blaming the United States and Ukraine for the intensified fighting and taking steps to offset the improvement in Ukraines military capability. The Russians have so far effectively countered Ukrainian military successes in some instances, retaliating with devastating effect. When Ukrainian forces in the summer of 2014 advanced into Donbass and took the strategically located city of Ilovaisk, Putin promptly called in his own crack troops, which quickly decimated the Ukrainian unit that had taken the town.

Should Putin decide to escalate in response to a U.S. decision to transfer lethal weapons to Ukraine, Washington would have few arrows in its quiver. Even if the Trump administration were to take another step up the ladder of escalation, Russia would go at least one step further. Russia shares a 1500-mile land/sea border with Ukraine, making the Kremlin far more invested in the fate of Ukraine than Washington. Russia has greater interest in putting skin in the game.

Rather than playing to Russias principal strength its military advantage over Ukraine the United States should continue to play to Russias main vulnerability its economic weakness. On this front, the United States and its European allies, not the Kremlin, hold the cards. The loss of income due to the low price of fossil fuels and the international sanctions imposed in response to its aggression in Ukraine have taken a serious toll on the Russian economy. Keeping sanctions in place and, if necessary, increasing them, is the Wests best source of leverage for pushing Russia to a diplomatic solution. Congress seems to realize as much, having just imposed on the White House legislation tightening U.S. sanctions against Russia.

Sending lethal weapons to Ukraine has one further downside it would cause a rift between the United States and its main European allies. Germany and France have been leading diplomatic efforts to find a diplomatic solution for Donbass and both have long opposed sending lethal weapons to Ukraine because of its potential to escalate the conflict.

The United States and Europe have moved in lock step since the beginning of the conflict, closely coordinating non-lethal military assistance to Ukraine as well as economic sanctions against Russia. Transatlantic solidarity has arguably been the Wests strongest suit, confronting Putin with a united front and keeping Russia in the penalty box despite pressure from parties on both sides of the Atlantic to drop sanctions and reap the accompanying commercial benefits.

Europeans are already on edge due to Congresss recent sanctions legislation, which imposes measures not coordinated with the European Union and that have the potential to cause undue harm to European companies. If Washington decides to head off on its own and send lethal weapons to Ukraine, solidarity on Ukraine may well come to end.

Putin has been working hard to achieve just this end. Washington would be making a serious strategic mistake if it hands to the Kremlin the transatlantic bust-up for which Moscow has long been hoping.

The conflict in Ukraine promises to poison Russias relations with the West until a diplomatic resolution is reached. But sending lethal weapons to Ukraine is a recipe for military escalation and transatlantic discord. The best way to bring peace to Ukraine is through transatlantic unity aimed at maintaining Russias political and economic isolation until it makes a deal at the negotiating table.

See more here:
Why giving Ukraine lethal weapons would be a massive mistake - Washington Post

Ukraine Arms Deal Deals Blow to Putin Backed Rebels – Newsweek – Newsweek

This article first appeared on the Daily Signal.

Kiev, UkraineOn the front lines against Russia and its separatist proxies in eastern Ukraine, Ukrainian soldiers have, throughout the past three years of relentless combat, frequently turned to symbols of America to both intimidate and annoy their enemiessometimes, in eclectic and creative ways.

Ukrainian soldiers have raised U.S. flags over their front-line trenches and fortstypically to the retort of sniper or mortar fire from across no mans land.

Daily Emails and Alerts - Get the best of Newsweek delivered to your inbox

Sometimes, to really get under the enemys skin, an English-speaking Ukrainian soldier will radio commands in English over unencrypted channels, pretending to be a member of SEAL Team Six.

At the front-line village of Krymske in 2015, just outside the separatist stronghold of Luhansk, Ukrainian troops renamed a street from that of a Soviet luminary to John McCain Street.

When Canadian journalist and filmmaker Christian Borys asked the soldiers when they were going to name a street after then-President Barack Obama, the soldiers replied, When he sends us weapons.

Since the war in the Donbas region began in April 2014, Russian propaganda has spun yarns about U.S. military forces actively participating in the war. Consequently, Ukrainian soldiers know that flaunting American military support for Ukraine is a potent psychological weapon against their enemies.

A Ukrainian soldiers fires a machine-gun on the front line at the industrial zone of the government-held town of Avdiyivka, Ukraine, May 22, 2017. Oleksandr Klymenko/reuters

Any instance of U.S. military support for Ukraine is also a powerful morale booster for Ukrainian troops as they continue to grind out a 3-year-old war against a combined force of Russian troops and pro-Russian separatists.

U.S. support lets the Ukrainians know the stronger guy is on their side, Mamuka Mamulashvili, commander of the pro-Ukrainian Georgian National Legion, told The Daily Signal in an interview.

Now, after three years of war, Ukrainian troops may soon have at their disposal the one tangible affirmation of U.S. military support theyve wanted the mostweapons.

On July 31, The Wall Street Journal reported that the Defense and State departments have drafted a proposal to sell Ukraine lethal defensive weapons, including the Javelin anti-tank missile. Congress has already approved sending Ukraine such weapons for defensive purposes.

According to news reports, it could take months for President Donald Trump to make a final decision about sending weapons to Ukraine. Ukrainian troops, however, treated the news as a positive development.

Support from the United States of our struggle for independence undoubtedly raises the fighting spirit of our soldiers, Alexander Pochynok, a Ukrainian sniper, told The Daily Signal. And the supply of advanced weapons systems such as Javelin will only accelerate our victory and the death of Russia.

The U.S. has provided non-lethal military assistance for Ukraine since 2014, the year Russia invaded and annexed Crimea, and then started a proxy war in Ukraines southeastern Donbas region.

To date, Trump has not deviated from Obamas decision to not arm Ukraine.

Lethal weapons deliveries, however, would signal a major U.S. policy shift, and one that would further sour U.S.-Russia relationswhich already have hit a post-Cold War nadir. Ukrainian troops and outside experts agree that, if approved, the true value of U.S. weapons transcends the battlefields of the Donbas.

Actually, the weapons themselves will not have a decisive impact on the course of combat operations, Ukrainian army Lt. Andrei Mikheychenko told The Daily Signal.

Deliveries of lethal weapons, in my opinion, will primarily have psychological significance for both the Ukrainian army and the terrorists it fights, Mikheychenko, a member of the Ukrainian armys 93rd Mechanized Brigade, said. This demonstrates the seriousness of U.S. support for Ukraine as a strategic partner.

Mamulashvili commands a unit of 130 foreign soldiers who have fought for three years to defend Ukraine in the Donbas against combined Russian-separatist forces. True to its name, the Georgian National Legion mainly comprises Georgian military veterans, many of whom have combat experience from Russias 2008 invasion of the former Soviet republic, as well as alongside U.S. troops in Afghanistan and Iraq.

But the Georgian National Legion also includes soldiers from other countries, including the United States, Austria, Armenia, Azerbaijan, Germany, Hungary, Moldova, Russia, and Chechnya.

Our common motivation is to fight against the aggressor, Mamulashvili said.

I understand the role of foreigners in this war, he said. Ukrainian soldiers are motivated when they see foreigners helping them. It makes the Ukrainians feel like they havent been abandoned.

When asked about the potential impact U.S. lethal weapons would have on the war, Mamulashvili replied: If the U.S. sends weapons, it would completely change the war the next day.

The Georgian commander singled out the U.S. Javelin as a weapon that had both symbolic significance as well as a practical utility on the battlefield.

The Javelin is not just a morale booster, its the weapon we need the most, Mamulashvili said. Theres a lot of Russian technology on the front lines. So we need it.

The two Russian-backed separatist territories in eastern Ukraine are among the most militarized parcels of land on earth. According to Ukrainian intelligence officials, combined Russian-separatist forces in eastern Ukraine currently wield 675 tanks, 478 of which are operational.

In the Donbas, Russia and its separatist proxies also have about 1,300 armored personnel carriers, 81 artillery pieces, 95 multiple-launch rocket systems, and 4,075 air defense systems.

The total manpower strength of combined Russian-separatist forces comprises about 34,000 separatists and foreign mercenaries, as well as about 3,000 Russian soldiers who serve, for the most part, in command and control positions.

Additionally, Russia has roughly 100,000 troops staged within its own territory near the Ukrainian bordera sword of Damocles portending a persistent threat of invasion in the eyes of both Ukrainian and U.S. officials.

Russia is already in Ukraine, they are already heavily armed, U.S. Special Envoy for Ukraine Kurt Volker told Radio Liberty in a recent interview after he visited the front-line town of Avdiivka in eastern Ukraine.

There are more Russian tanks in there than [tanks] in Western Europe combined, Volker said in the interview. It is a large, large military presence. An even larger contingent is concentrated at the borders of Ukraine.

Kiev, for its part, has about 60,000 troops deployed to the eastern war zoneknown as the Anti-Terrorist Operation zone, or ATO, among Ukrainian officials.

With so much military hardware and so many troops already concentrated in an area that comprises only about 5 percent of Ukraines overall land mass, U.S. weapons are not likely to tip the overall momentum of the conflict in Ukraines favor, Luke Coffey, director of The Heritage Foundations Allison Center for Foreign Policy Studies, told The Daily Signal.

The delivery of U.S. weapons like the Javelin would send a symbolic message of support to Ukraine, Coffey said. However, U.S. policymakers should understand that weapons are not the silver bullet to resolve the crisis in Ukraine. Providing such material should be done only as one part of the larger strategy to rein in Russian ambitions.

Moreover, according to The Wall Street Journal, any U.S. weapons delivered to Ukraine would be quarantined from the front lines. Presumably, this would be so that Ukraine would not antagonize Russia into tit-for-tat reprisals that escalate the conflict.

Even if the proposed U.S. weapons deliveries are kept clear of the front lines as promised, Ukrainian troops insist the move would still be a psychological win for their country.

Moral support is very important for us now we are feeling that we are not alone in our struggle, Sergiy Tsyhipa, a former Ukrainian special forces major and a war veteran, told The Daily Signal.

U.S. weapons would also mean more to Ukraines war effort than simply boosting morale. This year, Russia and its separatist proxies have used tanks more aggressively to attack Ukrainian positions, Ukrainian military officials have said. One common line of thinking among Ukrainian soldiers is that U.S. anti-tank weapons like the Javelin would deter more tank attacks.

From my point of view, the U.S. supporting us with weapons has two targets, said Tsyhipa, who, in addition to his service in Ukraines special operations forces, served in the Red Army in the 1980s.

Firstits a diplomatic breakthrough, a kind of diplomatic pressure on Russia. The Kremlin really didnt believe that the White House could do this, Tsyhipa said. Secondthis is a real help in the war, because Russians really are afraid of Javelins. Their tanks have recently become quite insolent, really. Maybe now they would think differently, and will remember the retribution waiting for them.

Mikheychenko, the Ukrainian army lieutenantwho has faced Russian tanks in combat on multiple occasionsalso said the Javelin would help defend against and deter combined Russian-separatist tanks.

Of course having the latest generation of weapons like the Javelin would make the terrorists forget tank attacks, Mikheychenko said, referring to combined Russian-separatist forces.

After three years, two failed cease-fires, and more than 10,000 fatalities, the war in eastern Ukraine continues to kill and wound soldiers and civilians on both sides of the conflict almost every day.

The February 2015 cease-fire, called Minsk II, has not stopped the fighting. It simply quarantined the war along about a 250-mile-long front line. Russia continues to supply the separatist territories with weapons and its own troops, according to NATO and Ukrainian officials, as well as years of independent news reports.

Moscow, for its part, has steadfastly denied sending weapons or troops into Ukraine.

Today, combat is mostly fought at a distance, using artillery, mortars, tanks, rockets, and snipers. Reconnaissance patrols and sabotage units sometimes slip across no mans land, too. But mostly the war is fought from within World War I-style trenches, and from ad hoc forts ensconced on the perimeters of artillery-razed villages.

The Ukraine conflict began on April 6, 2014. Spurred by Russian security agents and special operations troops, two Russian-backed breakaway territories in eastern Ukraine declared their independence from Kiev during the following weeks.

A combined force of pro-Russian separatists and Russian regulars was on the march in eastern Ukraine in 2014, and there were worries then that Ukraine could be split in two, or that Russia might launch a large-scale invasion. At that time, Ukraines regular army was in shambles due to decades of corruption and deliberate weakening from successive pro-Russian governments in Kiev.

With Ukraines regular army on its heels, civilian volunteer soldiers banded into partisan militias and set out for the front lines. This grassroots war effort, supported by civilian volunteers who ferried supplies out to the front lines, successfully parried the combined Russian-separatist advance. By July 2014, Kiev had retaken 23 out of the 36 districts it had previously lost.

The army was collapsed and demoralized, Pochynok, the Ukrainian sniper, said, referring to the opening weeks of the war in 2014. They gave [away] Crimea without any shots fired, and continued to surrender eastern Ukraine. But then came the volunteers, the patriots of Ukraine.

Pochynok, 37, achieved the rank of captain when he first served as a volunteer soldier in Ukraines regular army from 2000 to 2003. After years as a businessman, in 2014 he took up arms once again, volunteering to serve with Ukraines paramilitary units.

So in 2014 with my own weapons I went to war! Pochynok said.

I felt like this was my war, too, Mamulashvili said, explaining why, as a citizen of Georgia, he came to Ukraine to fight against Russian aggression. Ill stay as long as there is war here, and then Ill go fight Russia somewhere else.

Since 2014, Ukraine has radically reformed its military into a more capable fighting force.

In 2013, about 1 percent of Ukraines gross domestic product went to defense. Today, Kievs defense budget represents roughly 6 percent of its GDP. During the past three years, Ukraines active-duty ranks have increased from 150,000 to 250,000 troops.

Ukrainian officials and outside experts agree that Russia would overpower Ukraine in a direct confrontation. Russia, which has three times the population of Ukraine and 10 times its gross domestic product, has an active-duty force of about 800,000 soldiers with a reserve force of 2 million more. Russias 2015 defense budget was about $65 billionroughly 10 times that of Ukraine.

But, with a battle-tested standing army of about 250,000 active soldiers and stockpiles of Soviet-era weapons that could conceivably last for years, the Ukrainian military is now capable of mounting a formidable defense against Russiacertainly a much more robust one than in 2014.

Moreover, Ukraines grassroots war effort in 2014 is a bellwether for a protracted guerilla war if Russia ever tried to invade and occupy more Ukrainian territory.

Based on Ukraines stalwart resistance to Russias proxy war in the Donbas, some say that Ukraines military has proven its battlefield mettle and therefore deserves more substantial U.S. military aid.

Look at how Ukraine has defended itself to date without any support of U.S. weapons, Andrew Futey, president of the Ukrainian Congress Committee of America, told The Daily Signal.

They are fighting with outdated weapons and ammunition, Futey said. They have held their own. What is needed is the requested anti-tank, anti-mortar, anti-radar, and modern weapons to drive off the Russian invader and aggressor. Give the Ukrainian army and navy the proper tools and they will succeed.

Since 2014, Ukraine has embarked on a crash course revamp of its military-industrial complex. Now, the country is developing modern weapons systems such as new tanks, armored personnel carriers, and aircraft, which further boost its overall combat strength.

Ukraine was the worlds ninth-largest arms exporter from 2011 to 2015. And last week, Ukraines military-industrial conglomerate, Ukroboronprom, announced that its revenue from arms sales increased by 25 percent in the last yearup from $570 million to $770 million.

Ukraine has always been a peaceful country, but today its territory is a hotbed of hybrid warfare, Ukroboronprom Director Roman Romanov said at the European Defense Procurement Summit in February 2017, according to a statement on Ukroboronproms website.

We believe that all conflicts should be settled by political and diplomatic means only, Romanov said. But according to the current situation in Donbas and occupied Crimea, achieving this goal is possible only in case of parity of arms.

The delivery of U.S. lethal weapons, consequently, is not a do-or-die crossroads for Ukraines overall ability to defend itself.

Ukraine itself produces various types of weapons from small to anti-tank and missile, armored vehicles, and tanks, Mikheychenko said. The stocks of Soviet weapons in warehouses are also significant these stocks will last for a long time. Therefore, in the first place, the supply of [U.S.] weapons will have psychological and political consequences.

The U.S. has already provided Ukrainian troops with nonlethal military equipment and training, which has been valuable to troops on the front lines, Mikheychenko said.

The U.S. provides significant support to the Ukrainian army, including our 93rd Mechanized Brigade, Mikheychenko said. This concerns both the training of our soldiers by American instructors, and the supply of equipment: counterbattery radar, radio stations, vehicles, night vision scopes and thermal imaging, and much more.

The U.S. military, along with contingents from other NATO countries, have trained Ukrainian soldiers at a base in western Ukraine since 2015. Since 2014, the U.S. has sent special operations and Air Force advisers to Ukraine.

The FBI and CIA have, for years, assisted Ukrainian law enforcement and intelligence authorities in various investigations and operations. And U.S. law enforcement personnel trained Ukrainian police officers during a post-2014 revamp of the force.

Yet, despite congressional approval, successive U.S. presidential administrations have not followed through on sending Ukraine lethal weapons. The oft-cited reasoning is a fear of escalating the war, or inciting Russia to pursue more destabilizing aggression in the region.

However, a common line of thinking among Ukrainian troops and the foreign soldiers fighting on Ukraines behalf is that Russian aggression cannot be appeased through soft power diplomacy. Those soldiers believe they are fighting a war to keep Russian aggression at baynot only for Ukraines sake, but on behalf of the United States and the rest of Europe as well.

You have to know that [Russian President Vladimir] Putins separatist troops in the Donbas will fight regardless of whether the United States helps Ukraine or not, Tsyhipa, the former Ukrainian special forces major and Red Army soldier, said.

Ukraine is the border between the civilized world and barbarism, Mamulashvili said. Ukraine is the only country that stands in the way of the barbarians invading farther into Europe.

Futey, who leads the largest organization representing Ukrainian Americans, said Ukraine is an invaluable partner for the United States, and supplying Ukraine with lethal weapons is a prudent hedge against more destabilizing Russian aggression in Eastern Europe and the Middle East.

With such support, a democratic, independent Ukraine can and will stand together with the United States as stabilizing partners of the Euro-Atlantic security structure, Futey said.

By sending Ukraine lethal weapons, he added, the U.S. will once again reaffirm its leadership role in the world and stand side by side with the Ukrainian nation and people.

In the week from July 27 to Aug. 2, three Ukrainian soldiers were killed in action, and 21 were wounded. On July 20 alone, nine Ukrainian soldiers died in combat. It was the deadliest day of the war so far this year.

The war isnt over. And, ultimately, Ukrainian soldiers believe their own perseverance will be more important to achieving victory than U.S. weapons.

Sooner or later we will win, even without your help, Tsyhipa said. We must do it even at the cost of our own lives.

Nolan Peterson, a former special operations pilot and a combat veteran of Iraq and Afghanistan, is The Daily Signals foreign correspondent based in Ukraine.

View post:
Ukraine Arms Deal Deals Blow to Putin Backed Rebels - Newsweek - Newsweek

The Latest: Tillerson says Russia willing to discuss Ukraine – ABC News

The Latest on U.S. Secretary of State Rex Tillerson's meeting with Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov in the Philippines (all times local):

11:30 a.m.

U.S. Secretary of State Rex Tillerson says Russia is showing "some willingness" to start talking about a resolution to the crisis in Ukraine.

Tillerson made the comment after meeting with Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov. After the meeting, the Russian diplomat announced that the Trump administration was sending its new special representative for Ukraine negotiations to Moscow for talks.

Tillerson says the U.S. has been deliberate about coordinating with all the parties involved in the crisis. He says that's to avoid the perception the U.S. is trying to cut a side deal that would undermine any group's interests.

Tillerson says the U.S. has deep differences with Russia including on Ukraine, but that it's not a good idea to "just cut everything off on one single issue."

He says the U.S. and Russia still have important national security issues to discuss.

10:30 a.m.

U.S. Secretary of State Rex Tillerson says the U.S. will respond by Sept. 1 to Russia's move to force a major reduction in American diplomatic staff.

Tillerson is speaking to reporters during a visit to the Philippines. He says he communicated U.S. plans to respond by that deadline to Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov in their meeting in Manila on Sunday.

Tillerson says he told Lavrov that the U.S. still hasn't decided how it will respond. He says he asked Lavrov "several clarifying questions" about the act of Russian retaliation in response to new sanctions passed by Congress.

Russia said recently it was forcing the U.S. to cut its embassy and consulate staff in Russia by 755 people. But there's been confusion because the U.S. is believed to have far fewer than 755 American employees in Russia.

8:20 p.m.

Russia is anticipating difficulties in ensuring a cease-fire in the last of the four safe zones in Syria.

That's what Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov (sir-GAY' lahv-RAWF') has said in televised comments after his meeting with U.S. Secretary of State Rex Tillerson in Manila on Sunday.

Russia, Iran and Turkey agreed on a plan in May to establish four "de-escalation" zones in Syria, and they pressed the Syrian air force to halt flights over those areas.

Russia and Iran back Syrian President Bashar Assad. Turkey supports rebels fighting Syrian government forces.

Lavrov says he thinks "it will be difficult" to hammer out the details of the truce around the Syrian town of Idlib. He says Moscow hopes for a compromise to ensure the cease-fire if each country that wields influence in Syria including the United States can get the armed groups to comply.

7:50 p.m.

Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov (sir-GAY' lahv-RAWF') says U.S. Secretary of State Rex Tillerson has asked him for details about Moscow's recent action to retaliate against American sanctions.

Lavrov who met with Tillerson in the Philippines on Sunday says he explained how Russia will carry out its response. But Lavrov isn't giving out details.

The Kremlin says the U.S. must cut its embassy and consulate staff in Russia by 755 people. But there's been confusion because the U.S. is believed to have far fewer than 755 American employees in the country.

Russia also closed a U.S. recreational retreat on the outskirts of Moscow.

Lavrov says he met with Tillerson because there's no alternative to dialogue.

There's no immediate reaction to the meeting from the U.S. side.

7:30 p.m.

Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov (sir-GAY' lahv-RAWF') says President Donald Trump's special representative for Ukraine negotiations will soon make his first trip to Moscow.

Lavrov says U.S. Secretary of State Rex Tillerson made that commitment during their meeting Sunday in the Philippines.

Lavrov says American Kurt Volker will travel to Russia to discuss the conflict in eastern Ukraine. Volker will meet with Vladislav Surkov, the Russian envoy for the Ukraine crisis.

The Trump administration named Volker to the position in July. Volker made his first trip to eastern Ukraine last month.

Lavrov also says Tillerson agreed to continue a dialogue between U.S. Undersecretary of State Thomas Shannon and Russian Deputy Foreign Minister Sergey Ryabkov. That channel was created to address hot spots, but Russia suspended it after the U.S. tightened sanctions on Russia.

6 p.m.

The top American and Russian diplomats are meeting for the first time since President Donald Trump reluctantly signed into law a package of new sanctions targeting Moscow.

U.S. Secretary of State Rex Tillerson and Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov (sir-GAY' lahv-RAWF') are sitting down in Manila, Philippines, on the sidelines of a regional gathering.

The two diplomats smiled and exchanged pleasantries but made no substantive remarks as journalists were allowed in briefly for the start of their meeting.

Visit link:
The Latest: Tillerson says Russia willing to discuss Ukraine - ABC News

Namibian students attacked in Ukraine – New Era

Albertina Nakale

Windhoek-Two Namibian students were among the five African students in Ukraine who survived a savage mob attack, which has been described as an xenophobic assault on Africans by Ukrainian nationals.

The students were attacked by a group of about 40 Ukrainians while taking a stroll in a public park in central Lutsk, a green city on the Styr River in northwestern Ukraine.

The attack happened last week Thursday evening and has left Namibian students fearing for their lives. The students allege the terrifying incident looked like it was a planned attack as the mob had gardening tools such as rakes, spades and wood, ready to attack and kill.

Two of my fellow students were beaten and left unconscious; two managed to escape with minor injuries and one was left bleeding. They are in a bad state and were back from the hospital without any medical assistance.This has left us traumatized and feeling threatened, one of the students narrated to New Era over the phone. The students who were assaulted are from Algeria, Libya, Namibia, Nigeria, and Senegal.

The Permanent Secretary in the Ministry of International Relations and Cooperation, Selma Ashipala-Musavyi, confirmed the ministry has received reports of the attack.

Namibia is now waiting for a full official report from its embassy in Russia, which is responsible for Ukraine, on the health and safety of Namibian students in that country.

We heard about the attacks. We have contacted our embassy in Moscow because its the one accredited to Ukraine. They are trying to establish the facts. As soon as I have the facts I will inform the public. They are in contact with our students in Ukraine, Ashipala-Musavyi said.

The students are further aggrieved by the fact that the police had not arrested any of the people who attacked them.

Furthermore, the students also complained there are many agencies in Ukraine that overcharge students as much as N$60,000 for language courses, which they say is way too much.

Ukraineis a multi-ethnic and multicultural nationwhereracism and ethnic discriminationare arguably largely a fringe issue.

However, incidents of violence have been recorded where the victimsraceis widely thought to have played a role. Those incidents receive extensive media coverage and are usually condemned by all mainstream political forces. But Human Rights Watch has reported that racism and xenophobia remain entrenched problems in Ukraine.

Read more here:
Namibian students attacked in Ukraine - New Era

Ukraine boosts its sugar exports sixfold in 11 months – Ukrinform. Ukraine and world news

Having entered the markets of Asia and Africa, Ukraine boosted its sugar exports almost sixfold in September 2016 - July 2017 (current marketing year) compared to the figures for the entire 2015/2016 MY.

Ukrinform learnt this from the Ukrtsukor National Association of Sugar Producers of Ukraine.

"Although the current marketing year has not ended yet, domestic sugar producers have already increased deliveries to the foreign markets almost sixfold, up to 751,000 tons, compared to the previous marketing year (132,200 tons in 2015/2016 MY). This is a big victory for producers which managed to enter completely new and unfamiliar markets and sell their products around the world," commented Ruslana Butilo, the head of the Associations analytical department.

As noted, Ukrainian sugar has entered the markets of Africa and Asia this marketing year. In particular, Ukraine has started to supply sugar to the markets of Sri Lanka, Libya, Myanmar, Cote d'Ivoire, Turkey, Somalia, Guinea and Togo.

Earlier, the Ukrtsukor forecasted that 2.0 million tons of sugar would be produced in Ukraine in 2017/2018 MY.

In 2015/2016 MY, 1.43 million tons of sugar were produced in Ukraine.

ol

Read more here:
Ukraine boosts its sugar exports sixfold in 11 months - Ukrinform. Ukraine and world news