Archive for the ‘Ukraine’ Category

Ukraine seeks to avoid being a bargaining chip between Washington and Moscow – CBC.ca

As former law professor, Oksana Syroyid is used to educating people.

She has found that to be a useful skill these days.

As deputy Speaker of Ukraine's parliament, Syroyid took to educating Canadian and U.S. lawmakers during a recent visit, walking them through the labyrinth of politics in her country and Eastern Europe.

As with any tutoring, there needed to be a healthy dose of repetition and connecting the dotssomething Syroyid believes is critical as Ukraine tries to avoid becoming a bargaining chip between Washington and Moscow.

During a recent appearance at the House of Commons foreign affairs committee, Syroyid appealed to Canadian politicians to help her educate the new U.S. administration about the geopolitical significance of her country.

In Washingtonshe found,much like her Canadian counterparts,an official vacuum with many key positions still unfilledand ill-defined policy that has been punctuated by contradictory campaign speeches and errant Donald Trump tweets.

"We have the same challenge," Liberal MP John McKay told her.

"Thank God we are not alone," she said.

It might be said, with looming trade disputesover softwood lumber and aerospace subsidies,thatCanadians are having the same trouble educating Americans.

For the Canada-U.S. relationship, the stakes are enormous, particularly on the economic scale, but arguably they are not existential.

The stakes are far higher in Ukraine, with its eastern districts in the midst of a Russian-backed insurgency.

Syroyid chuckled when asked about having to repeat the same message all over the world.

"We do it in different capitals," she told CBC News. "We do it in Paris. We do it in Berlin. We do it Brussels. Anywhere we can reach, we do the same talk."

There is, however, a growing sense of gravity to the discussion as witnessed last week when former Ukrainian prime minister Arseniy Yatsenyuk also made the rounds in Ottawa.

Former Ukrainian prime minister Arseniy Yatsenyuk says he is somewhat reassured Ukraine is still on the U.S. administration's radar. (Sean Gallup/Getty Images)

He sees a renewed opportunitywith the election of the Trump administration to obtain modern military equipment for his country. Following a meeting with U.S. Secretary of State Rex Tillerson, Yatsenyuksays he is somewhat reassured Ukraine is still on the administration'sradar.

Aside from Washington's jumbled foreign policy, there are some places in Europe where there is pressure for trade-offs because the Ukrainian crisis is measured in dollars and cents.

"People want to do business with Russia," Syroyid said.

But recent events in eastern Ukraine, largely ignored in the West, may prove meaningful in the conflict, which occasionally seems to unfold in slow motion.

Ukraine's national energy company cut off electricity to separatist-occupied regions of Donbass on April 25, and within an hour the lights were back on.

Russia's power grid is now supplying the energy, at what local media estimates is a cost of $53 million US ayear.

This is where it gets complicated and downright opaque.

The move would appear, on the surface, to be another step towards secession in the contested region.

The Ukrainian utility, which was until 2014 a state-run enterprise, apparently counts a Russian oligarch among its biggest investors, she said.

The company, according to Syroyid, has not explained its decision other than to say it was no longer willing to underwrite the millions of dollars in unpaid bills from the breakaway regions.

"It's a game. It's a play," she said.

Russian ownership of key Ukrainian businesses is a matter of burgeoning political concern.

Syroyid describes it as the fourth wave in Russia's ongoing attempt to "colonize" her country.

The first wave was direct military intervention to annex Crimea.

The second wave was the backing of separatists in economically depressed eastern regions.

The third wave was what she describes as "political colonization" through an attempt to have Ukraine's constitution rewritten under the Minsk agreements.

Those separate accords were an attempt by the international community to stop the fighting in the breakaway regions regions of Donetsk and Luhansk.

Members of the separatist, self-proclaimed Donetsk People's Republic army collect parts of a destroyed Ukrainian army tank in the town of Vuhlehirsk. (Baz Ratner/Reuters)

But Syroyid says the political intention was "actually to colonize Ukraine back to Russia without any further shooting."

That is not the view of France, Germany, Belarus, Russia and even her own government, which signed on to the accord.

But her comments represent a further hardening of political resolve within Ukraine.

"The people of Ukraine didn't want it," she said. "They realized it was just a trick and any treaties with Russia make no sense."

The economic investment pro-Russian forces have made in her country, the so-called "controlled enterprises on the uncontrolled territory of Ukraine", represent the latest and perhaps greatest threat, she says.

They are legitimate businesses that pay taxes, but take their marching orders from Moscow, according to Syroyid.

Ukrainian army veterans and political activists who've fought in the stalemated eastern war have been applying political pressure on the government of President Petro Poroshenko to cut trade ties with the breakaway region.

Despite the trenches and daily shelling, shipments of coal, steel and other commodities still travel between the breakaway regions and Ukraine.

Syroyid says the message from soldiers, some who have blockaded railway lines, has been,"Stop the support of those who are killing us."

It is an elaborate set of circumstances that the Ukrainians believe bears repeating, particularly in Washington.

"We are ready to explain as long as somebody is willing to listen to us," Syroyid said.

Original post:
Ukraine seeks to avoid being a bargaining chip between Washington and Moscow - CBC.ca

Another View: Russia’s aims still drive friction as attention to Ukraine … – Press Herald

Ukraine has receded from world attention since its peak in 2014, when it changed presidents, Russia annexed Crimea and fighting was active in its east. The world reacted, for the large part, with words rather than actions.

Independent since 1991 in the wake of the Soviet Unions dissolution, Ukraine, Europes second-largest country, with a population of 45 million, is in the center of a tough region, with borders on Belarus, Hungary, Moldova, Poland, Romania, Russia and Slovakia. None of these seven countries is particularly prosperous. Russia is far and away Ukraines most important trading partner, taking 18 percent of its exports and providing 22 percent of its imports.

Russias annexation of Crimea, and its continued military involvement in Ukraines rebellious east, is the current cause of tension, intermittent fighting and complex relations between the two. It bears noting that Crimea was part of Russia until 1954 and that 60 percent of the population of Crimea is Russian speaking.

Russia and President Vladimir Putin, seeking to bolster his popular political support through successful aggression in Ukraine, are very much the villains of the piece in the trouble in eastern Ukraine, the annexation of Crimea and Western European and American reaction, including economic sanctions against Russia.

Seeking to make lemonade from the lemon of current relations, the Russians and the Trump administration could serve as the vehicle through which the Ukraine problem, as a regional issue, could be cleaned up. The U.S. could stop pushing to incorporate Ukraine into Western Europe through NATO and the European Union, Russia could withdraw its military support for the eastern Ukrainian rebels, and Crimea could become some sort of internationally observed territory as a step toward restoring it to Ukraine.

Putin and Trump need to meet soon, in any case. Ukraine has to be on the agenda.

Excerpt from:
Another View: Russia's aims still drive friction as attention to Ukraine ... - Press Herald

Russian TV host issues extraordinary rant calling Ukraine’s citizens ‘slaves to the EU’ – Express.co.uk

A Russian TV presenter mocked the Ukrainian President, Petro Poroshenkoin an angry tirade in which he claimed Ukranian's were becoming slaves to the European Union.

During his rant, the host targeted Ukraine's President suggesting his decision to join a visa waiver agreementis negatively impacting his citizens.

Speaking to Vesti News, Dmitry Kiselyov, said: Previously [Mr Poroshenko] called a visa-free tourism to the EU a national idea of the Ukrainians.

Now, he said that a final divorce was completed with Russia.

YOUTUBEVESTINEWS

If you look at the price of this visa-free regime, there will be no giggles.

You would be horrified.

The TV host then claimed the Ukrainian President was turning his citizens into slaves for the EU.

He added: According toofficialdate of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Ukraine, four million of their citizens germanely reside in Russia.

Approximately the same amount of Ukrainian migrant workers reside in the West.

The visa-free regime... turns his citizens into slaves for the European Union

Russian TV host

The visa-free regime that made Poroshenko giggle so much, turns his citizens into slaves for the European Union.

Tourists from Ukraine dont get the right to work or study in the EU, and their stay there is limited, 90 days within six months.

The European Union approved visa-free travel for Ukrainians following a long-awaited decision.

The host also criticised Ukraine for the way they managed the Eurovision song contest.

The European performance cost the Ukrainian treasury 30million, while better Eurovision music shows, for example, held in Sweden or Estonia, cost three times less, he said.

EPA

1 of 11

Jean-Claude Juncker jokes and gives Margaritis Schinas a slap before the weekly college meeting of the European Commission

The TV presenter, who in 2013 was appointed by Vladimir Putin to head the countrys government-owned news agency, finished by claiming the EU was the most corrupt country in Europe.

He said: Following the results ofthe 2016,the Accounting Court of Auditors of the European Union, official recognised Ukraine as the most corrupt country in Europe.

There, bribes are a common thing and are accepted everywhere. Everyone can be bribed.

In February 2015, the warring parties to the Ukrainian conflict signed the Minsk agreement in order to bring an end to violence in the region.

Earlier this month, Angela Merkel told Vladimir Putin that EU sanctions would be lifted if Moscow fully implemented the Minsk Agreement.

Read this article:
Russian TV host issues extraordinary rant calling Ukraine's citizens 'slaves to the EU' - Express.co.uk

EU-Ukraine civil society denounce persisting impunity for crimes against journalists in Ukraine – EU News

The weak legislation on protection of the environment was also high on the agenda

The 4th meeting of the EU-Ukraine Civil Society Platform (CSP) in Brussels held a debate to assess the progress in the implementation of the EU-Ukraine Association Agreement. The discussions focused on environmental protection, media freedom and the first year of the EU-Ukraine Deep and Comprehensive Free Trade Agreement.

Opening the meeting, co-chair Alfredas Jonuka, member of the EESC welcomed the reforms carried out by Ukraine to implement the EU-Ukraine Association Agreement (AA), and said he hopes that these demanding reforms continue to be as determined and consistent.

The co-chair from the Ukrainian side, Zoriana Mishchuk, expert of the Ukrainian Environmental NGO "MAMA-86", began a debate which welcomed the Councils adoption of the Commission's proposal for visa-free travel regime for the citizens of Ukraine for up to 90 days.

The CSP meeting assessed the state of play in the implementation of the EU-Ukraine Association Agreement. On the DCFTA, the participants stated that the EU and Ukraine should closely monitor its implementation and assess the impact on trade and investments, on labour, environmental and human rights issues.

Media freedom

The Platform declared its satisfaction with the significant improvements in the media environment in Ukraine since 2014 including transparency and strengthening the legislative environment for journalists and media outlets. However, the Platform regretted that impunity for crimes committed against journalists in Ukraine persists; including undue political interference on content and violence, harassment, and other abuse of journalists. It recommended that journalist organisations and overseeing bodies increase the ethical standards for media, and invest into the competences of both journalists and managers of media outlets competence exchange and on-the-job training programmes in the media outlets and institutions of the EU Member States. Serious challenges remain, such as: fragmentation of reforms, lack of strategic vision in reforming mass media and public broadcasting, lack of unified position of responsible authorities, and the absence of effective control over public authorities on information disclosure. Journalistic investigations lead not to punishment for misuses, but, to aggressions against journalists.

Environmental protection

The CSP noted that environmental issues are of low priority on the agenda of the Ukrainian government and parliament, resulting in limited progress. The adoption of laws on environmental governance was vetoed by the President and reforms have been undermined by vested interests, weak governance, political instability and lack of leverage on the part of the EU. It therefore called upon the government to speed up the update of its National Strategy on environmental policy until 2020 and to adopt its National Action Plan. The joint declaration expressed concern regarding the absence in Ukraine of legal acts to ensure the implementation of crucial environmental policy tools, such as Environmental Impact Assessment and Strategic Environmental Assessment.

The Platform adopted its joint declaration which will be forwarded to the EU-Ukraine Association Council, the Association Committee, the Parliamentary Association Committee and other relevant bodies both in Ukraine as well as in the EU.

Background

The EU-Ukraine Civil Society Platform, established in April 2015, is one of the joint bodies established under the EU-Ukraine Association Agreement. It allows civil society organisations from both sides to monitor the implementation process and submit their recommendations to the relevant authorities. Its previous meeting on 8-9 November 2016 in Kyiv addressed labour market regulation and antidiscrimination legislation issues.

The Platform has 15 members on both sides. On the EU side, it comprises 9 members of the the European Economic and Social Committee (EESC) in Brussels and 6 permanent observers from European civil society networks (Eurochambres, BusinessEurope, ETUC, Copa-Cogeca, Cooperatives Europe, EaP Civil Society Forum).

Read the rest here:
EU-Ukraine civil society denounce persisting impunity for crimes against journalists in Ukraine - EU News

Ukraine also faced monument removal challenges – WWL

With emotions still raw from the removal of New Orleans' Confederate monuments, it can be helpful to look at how other countries have dealt with the changing symbols of history.

David Hammer, WWL 12:40 PM. CDT May 21, 2017

NEW ORLEANS -- With emotions still raw from the removal of New Orleans' Confederate monuments, it can be helpful to look at how other countries have dealt with the changing symbols of history.

From the joyous fall of the Berlin Wall in 1989, to U.S Marines toppling a massive Saddam Hussein statue when they took Bagdhad in 2003, historic symbols of oppression often come down when regimes change. But in the American South, its been a much longer, more painful process.

It took 152 years after the Confederacy lost the Civil War, more than 100 years after Jim Crow-era leaders erected statues honoring heroes of the so-called Lost Cause and more than 50 years after the fall of Jim Crow for New Orleans to take down three Confederate monuments of President Jefferson Davis and Gens. Robert E. Lee and P.G.T. Beauregard and a fourth dedicated to an uprising of white supremacists at the Battle of Liberty Place.

The closest comparison may be in Ukraine, where it took 25 years after Ukrainian independence to take down more than 1,300 statues of Vladimir Lenin, the Soviet leader who conquered Ukraine in 1921.

Investigative journalist Oleg Khomenok said thats because when Ukraine re-asserted its independence with the fall of the Soviet Union in 1991, it remained under Communist control.

Actually, the first Ukrainian president was the chief of the Central Committee of the Communist Party of Ukraine, and there was no way to get rid of this legacy, Khomenok said.

It took decades for Ukraine to truly emerge from under Russias thumb. The Orange Revolution of late 2004 helped undo a rigged presidential election and get a pro-Western government. But the pro-Russian candidate, Viktor Yanukovych, took back control in 2010.

Khomenok knows first-hand about toppling regimes. He led a television news investigation into Yanukovychs corruption and was among a group of journalists who chased the disgraced president out of his opulent Mezhyhirya palace in 2014.

Another pro-Western government took over and finally passed a law to remove the Communist monuments and change more than 52,000 street and town names.

Since then, Russia has seized the Crimean peninsula and made military incursions into eastern Ukraine. But Khomenok says resistance to the law removing Communist symbols and names has not been seriously challenged.

One argument that was made against the law sounds a lot like those made recently against removing the Confederate monuments in New Orleans.

The Communist Party leaders were talking this shouldnt be done because this is the history and is part of our past, Khomenok said.

But that didnt fly.

Actually, the Communist Party of Ukraine was also banned as a part of this law, Khomenok said. The website Raining-Lenins.Silk.co tracks whats called the Lenin-Fall movement in Ukraine. It keeps photos and maps of all the Lenin statues around the world, including four in the U.S. -- in a park in Seattle, atop a building in New Yorks East Village and at casinos in Las Vegas and Atlantic City.

Earlier this year, Khomenok came to New Orleans to meet with reporters and got to see the Confederate monuments in person. When he heard about the debate, he found the motivation to take down symbols of American slavery reminiscent of the passions that drove the Lenin-Fall movement.

They were mad that these people who were guilty (of) a million peoples deaths would be standing on the squares in the cities, to be looking (like) glorious heroes of the country, he said.

2017 WWL-TV

Originally posted here:
Ukraine also faced monument removal challenges - WWL