When Russia invaded Ukraine in 2022, Kyivs maritime prospects    looked bleak. Ukraine had inherited a small number of ships    when the Soviet Union broke apart, but Russia destroyed or    confiscated most of these when it occupied Crimea in 2014.    Then, in 2018, Russia seized three of Ukraines remaining    vessels and prevented its civilian ships from entering the    Kerch Strait, the waterway separating the Crimean Peninsula    from mainland Russia. Russia quickly reopened the strait and    eventually returned the ships, but the moves laid bare    Ukraines naval impotence. By the time of the next invasion,    the Ukrainian navys flagshipan aging frigateled a meager    force consisting of one small warship, several small missile    boats, and a handful of helicopters. Two weeks after the war    began, Ukrainian commanders were compelled to scuttle the    flagship, lest it fall into Moscows hands. Russia sank many of    the smaller vessels.  
    Over the next year and a half, however, Ukraine    turned the naval war around. Using drones, cruise missiles, and    a variety of unconventional techniques, Ukraine had, by October    2023, driven the Russian fleet from its main base in Crimea to    the eastern corner of the Black Sea. The countrys navy    succeeded in sinking nine major Russian ships and even    reoccupying some lost territory. These victories have been a    bright spot for a country that is under continual air attack    and stuck in a costly stalemate on the ground.  
    Kyivs maritime accomplishments will not win the war, but those    victories will help the country succeed more broadly. Winning    at sea has allowed Kyiv to take troops that were stationed    along the coast and send them to the front. It has secured    shipping lanes that are crucial to exporting grain and    complicated Russian efforts to supply and reinforce     Crimea. Over time, Ukraine can build on this success,    increasing its leverage in future peace negotiations. For this    strategy to succeed, however, Kyiv will require an    uninterrupted flow of military aid from the West.  
    When the invasion began, the Russian Black Sea Fleet was far    mightier than its Ukrainian equivalent, consisting of the    battle cruiser Moskva, five frigates, six modern    submarines, 13 tank landing ships, and many smaller vessels    suitable for coastal defense. Fighter jets, patrol aircraft,    and helicopters supported the fleet. With this overwhelming    force, the Russian navy encroached on the Ukrainian coast,    launching missiles at Ukrainian cities, and landing forces at    the port ofMariupol. To prevent a landing near Odessa,    Ukraine had to stationan infantry brigade and a powerful    armored brigadealong the coasttaking 5,000 trained    troops and 100 tanks out of play as fighting raged around the    countrys two largest cities, Kharkiv and Kyiv.  
    But Russias early success did not last. A month into the war,    Ukrainian missiles fired from drones sank several Russian    patrol boats. In the most spectacular episode of the Ukrainian    comeback, two antiship missiles launched from the Ukrainian    coaststruck the Moskva in April 2022. The    Russian navy tried to tow the damaged ship to its base in    Crimea, but the vessel sank en route. It was the largest    warship sunk in battle since the British torpedoed the    Argentine cruiser Belgrano in 1982 during the    Falklands War.  
    Two months later, after the Moskvas demise,    theUkrainian military pushed Russian forces off Snake    Island, which is located along shipping lanes near Ukraines    southern coast. The island became famous in the early days of    the war after its Ukrainian defenders sent an expletive-laden    message of defiance as Russia took the island. But after    repeated Ukrainian missile attacks on resupply vessels, the    Russian troops stationed on the island were forced to withdraw    in June 2022.  
    According to calculations from the Center for Strategic and    International Studies, Russia has lost about 40 percent of its    naval tonnage in the Black Sea since February 2022. In addition    to the Moskva, Ukrainian missiles and drones have    destroyed or severely damaged two frigates, five tank landing    ships, and a submarine. Strikes on Russian naval headquarters,    shipyards, airfields, and air defense facilities in Crimea have    weakened the fleets shore-based defenses, command-and-control    networks, and logistical support. To protect its remaining    ships, Russiamoved most of themto its naval base at    Novorossiysk, in the eastern part of the Black Sea. But even    there, far away from the action, the ships were not safe. In    August 2023, a Ukrainian sea drone crossed the Black Sea and    damaged a Russian warship in the harbor.  
    Many of the weapons Ukraine has been using against the Russian    fleet, although not new, had not been tested in a prolonged    naval campaign. Ukraine has shown they can be remarkably    effective. Two types of missiles have proved particularly    useful. The first is the long-range antiship missile. Ukraine    produces some of these missiles domestically and receives some    from the United States. They have a range of 100 to 200 miles,    enough to keep Russian ships far offshore, lest they suffer the    same fate as the Moskva. Although the missiles were    originally designed to be placed on ships, Ukraines military    has adapted them for land-based launchers to reduce their    vulnerability to counterstrikes. The second missile    varietythelong-range, land-attack missilecomplements    Ukraines antiship capabilities. Produced largely by the United    States, the United Kingdom, France, and Ukraine itself, these    weapons are fired at static locations and were designed for    ground operations, not for striking highly mobile naval    targets. By aiming at stationary ships in harbor, however, the    Ukrainians have used these land-attack missiles to take out    five of the nine major vessels that Russia has lost during the    war.  
    Ukraines use of sea drones is an especially novel development    in naval warfare. Operated remotely and difficult to spot,    these weapons can reach deep into an adversarys maritime    domain while carrying large payloads. And because operators    follow the vessels movements via video link, they can adjust    course, evade countermeasures, and even switch targets if the    initial target is unavailable. According to the Ukrainian    defense ministry, one such sea drone managed to sink a Russian    ship stationed near Crimea in January 2024.  
    Accurate targeting information has been key to the success of    the weapons systems Ukraine uses at sea. GPS-guided munitions    must be programmed to hit the correct location at the correct    time; hitting the dock after the ship leaves is a waste of a    missile that Kyiv cannot afford. Even munitions that can adjust    course midflight must be launched with enough accuracy for the    missiles guidance system to find the target. The farther away    that target is, the harder the task becomes. The advanced    satellite, electronic surveillance, and other intelligence    capabilities that the United States and other partners provide    are critical.  
    Ukraine has won the battle for the Black Sea. Yet it will be    some time before the full implications of this victory become    clear, for the current war and for modern naval combat more    broadly. The Ukrainian militarys routing of a vastly stronger    navy could indicate that conventional surface ships have become    obsolete, or it could merely serve as a warning to future naval    combatants that without sound tactics and appropriate defensive    systems, they, like Russia, will be vulnerable to attack.  
    Ukraines naval success does not spell an end to a war fought    primarily on the ground. It does, however, give Kyiv several    important advantages.One is political and psychological.    Defeating the Russian fleet at sea boosts morale among    Ukrainian civilians and military forces. And as Ukrainian    President Volodymyr    Zelensky makes the case for continued outside support for    his countrys war effort, he can highlight this success.    Ukraines backers, discouraged by the stalemate on the ground    and relentless Russian attacks from the air, can point to the    naval victory as evidence that military success is    possible.  
    With Russian ships driven far from Ukrainian shores, the threat    of an amphibious attack is gone. Ukraine has therefore been    able to redistribute the ground forces that had been guarding    the shoreline and leave coastal defense to local militias.    Ukrainian ports and coastal settlements are safer, too, easing    the anxiety felt earlier in the war when gunfire and missile    attacks from offshore Russian warships were a feature of    everyday life.  
    Another benefit is the logistical challenge Russia    now faces. Moscow is having an increasingly difficult time    sending supplies to Crimea as Ukrainian missile attacks    threaten Russian transport vessels and periodically shut down    the Kerch Strait bridge, which connects the peninsula to    mainland Russia. Although Russia can still send barges across    the strait, this workaround strains an already troubled    logistics system. Moreover, supply chain interruptions bring    suffering to the Crimean population. The peninsulas increasing    vulnerability may persuade Moscow to settle more quickly when    peace negotiations finally begin. Otherwise, a weakened Russian    military may be unable to fend off Ukrainian incursions, and a    suffering population on the peninsula may choose reunification    with Ukraine rather than continued hardship under Russian rule.  
    Finally, Ukraine has reducedbut not yet eliminatedRussias    ability to interfere with grain exports from Odessa. Pushing    back the Russian navy has allowed coastal traffic to move    again. Although Russia backed out of a 2022 agreement allowing    Ukrainian cargo ships carrying critical shipments of grain    through the Black Sea, it has not tried to stop shipments from    leaving Ukrainian ports. Moscow could still change its mind.    But with its navy forced out of the area, it has only two    remaining methods for blocking Ukrainian shipments: laying    mines and using its submarines to attack cargo ships. Ukraines    control of the sea makes these alternatives more difficult.    Russia would need to have ships or aircraft to lay mines, and    both would be vulnerable to Ukrainian countermeasures as they    approach the Ukrainian coast. Submarine attacks on cargo ships,    meanwhile, would invite global condemnation, including among    developing countries that rely on imported grain and whose    support Russia seeks.  
    Ukraine needs help from its allies to sustain these advantages.    Although Kyivs supply of antiship missiles is likely    sufficient for now, given their relatively infrequent use, the    Ukrainian military will certainly need more land-attack    missiles from France, the United Kingdom, and the United    States. Ukraine will also continue to rely on intelligence    support from the United Kingdom, the United States, and other    partners to identify targets and Russian vulnerabilities.  
    To build on its success, Ukraine will need to do more than    reinforce its current capabilities. Most urgently, the country    needs better equipment and training to clear sea mines. Russian    mines still constrain Ukrainian operations by confining ships    to a few easily interdicted channels. Western powers can    provide small boats and equipment to find and eliminate mines    at all depths. If Ukraine can neutralize Russias ability to    block grain shipments through the Black Sea and can keep    shipping lanes open, Moscow will lose a powerful source of    leverage in any future peace negotiations.  
    The Ukrainian military must also learn to conduct antisubmarine    warfare. Russias submarines in the Black Sea are essentially    invulnerable; they can fearlessly strike any target at will. So    far, Moscow has not used its submarines because of a lack of    military targets, as there is nothing left in the Ukraines    navy worth attacking, and it is reluctant to risk sinking other    countries cargo ships. But submarines remain Russias trump    card in naval combat; Moscow need only choose to play it.    Ukraine, then, needs to figure out how to neutralize this    threat.  
    Kyiv will have to get creative. It cant waste time and money    trying to replicate the multibillion-dollar systems of    sophisticated surface vessels, submarines, and aircraft that    Western navies use to hunt enemy submarines. Ukraines fight    does not echo the vast scale and existential stakes of    submarine battles in the North Atlantic during World War    II or NATOs massive efforts to counter hundreds of Soviet    submarines during the Cold War. Kyiv just needs to exert enough    pressure to make the five Russian submarines operating in the    Black Sea pull backsomething it could accomplish with U.S. and    NATO antisubmarine weapons and detection equipment adapted to    operate on readily available small vessels. That would reduce    threats to Ukrainian shipping and ease economic pressure on the    Ukrainian government to make concessions in any eventual peace    negotiations.  
    Finally, Ukraine should build a modest amphibious capability    that can threaten Russian positions in Crimea and the Russian    rear areas along the Black Sea coast. Small craft, which are    available immediately from the United States and other NATO partners,    would be sufficient tokeep Russian forces looking over    their shoulders. Moreover, such small craft can be transported    quickly overland, avoiding Russian submarines, as well as the    complication of the Montreux Convention, a 1936 diplomatic    agreement that allows Turkey to prevent the passage of warships    through the straits that lead to the Black Sea. With an    amphibious force poised near Russian-controlled territory,    Ukraine could draw Russian troops away from the frontlines to    defend the coastthe same tactic Russia used against Ukraine at    the beginning of the war.Eventually, Ukraine might also    use this amphibious capability as part of a campaign to retake    Crimea.  
    Such an offensive is not possible today. Crimea is strongly    defended, and an amphibious assault on it would be extremely    complex. Instead, periodic raids into Crimea, such as those    Ukraine has conducted in the nearby Kherson region, would make    the amphibious threat credible and distract the Russians from    the key ground battles inland.  
    Ukraines naval success is dramatic and unprecedented, but the    tide of victory could ebb if the United    States and other Ukrainian partners cut their assistance.    If Ukraine cannot replace the munitions it fires and the    equipment it loses in battle, Russian forces will again    encroach on Ukrainian coasts and reestablish secure supply    lines through Crimea. Were that to happen, Ukraines victory at    sea could be fleeting.  
    Loading...    Please enable JavaScript for this site to    function properly.  
Excerpt from:
Ukraine's Victory at Sea: How Kyiv Subdued the Russian Fleetand What It Will Need to Build on Naval Success - Foreign Affairs Magazine