Archive for the ‘Ukraine’ Category

Latest from the OSCE Special Monitoring Mission to Ukraine (SMM), based on information received as of 19:30, 1 May … – Reliefweb

This report is for the media and the general public.

The SMMs operations in Donetsk and Luhansk regions remained restricted following_the fatal incident of 23 April near Pryshyb; these restrictions continued to limit the Missions observations, including of ceasefire violations. The Mission recorded more ceasefire violations in both Donetsk and Luhansk regions, compared with the previous 24-hour period. The SMM continued monitoring the disengagement areas near Stanytsia Luhanska, Zolote and Petrivske. Its access remained restricted there and elsewhere.* Small-arms fire occurred close to the SMM inside the Stanytsia Luhanska disengagement area. The Mission continued to monitor the withdrawal of weapons. The SMM monitored two border areas currently not under government control. In Kyiv, Kharkiv, Dnipro and Odessa, the Mission monitored gatherings marking 1 May._

In Donetsk region the SMM recorded moreceasefire violations, [1]including about 220 explosions compared withthe previous 24-hourperiod (100 explosions).

On the evening of 30 April, while in government-controlled Svitlodarsk (57km north-east of Donetsk), the SMM heard about ten explosions assessed as impacts of mortar (120mm) rounds and over 80 bursts of heavy-machine-gun fire, all 3-5km south-east. On 1 May, at the same location, the SMM heard 123 explosions, of which 85 were assessed as impacts of mortar (120mm) and artillery (122mm) rounds and 38 outgoing recoilless gun (SPG-9, 73mm) rounds, and about 140 bursts and shots of infantry fighting vehicle (IFV) (BMP-2) cannon (30mm) and small-arms fire, all 2.5-4km south-east and east.

On the night of 30 April-1 May the SMM camera at the DPR-controlled Oktiabr mine (9km north-west of Donetsk city centre) recorded, in sequence, two undetermined explosions, 17 tracer rounds in flight from north to south, three projectiles in flight from south-west to north-east and one illumination flare in vertical flight. Approximately four hours later, the camera recorded 92 projectiles in flight from west to east, one east to west, followed by aggregated totals of 63 projectiles in flight from north to south, 14 south to north, three west to east, all 8-10km north-east.

On the evening and night of 30 April-1 May the SMM camera in government-controlled Avdiivka (17km north of Donetsk) recorded one projectile from south to north, one undetermined explosion and one projectile in flight from north to south, followed by aggregated totals of three undetermined explosions and 20 projectiles in flight (15 north to south, three south to north and two west to east), all 3-5km east-south-east. The following day, positioned in Avdiivka for about five hours, the SMM heard 36 explosions (24 assessed as outgoing rounds and the remainder undetermined) and about ten bursts of heavy-machine-gun and small-arms fire, all 2-4km south-east. Later the same day, the camera recorded 23 explosions assessed as impacts and three projectiles in flight from north-east to south-west, all 3-5km east-south-east.

On the evening and night of 30 April-1 May, the SMM camera in Shyrokyne (20km east of Mariupol) recorded an explosion assessed as an outgoing round and a rocket-assisted projectile in flight from west to east, at unknown distances north, followed by a total of: seven undetermined explosions, 60 tracer rounds in flight (51 from east to west and nine from west to east), two rocket-assisted projectiles in flight (one east to west and one west to east) and one illumination flare in vertical flight, all at undetermined distances north.

In Luhansk region the SMM recorded more ceasefire violations, including, however, fewer explosions (about 65), compared withthe previous 24-hour period(75 explosions).

On 1 May, positioned in LPR-controlled Sentianivka (formerly Frunze, 44km west of Luhansk), the SMM heard over 50 undetermined explosions 5-7km east-north-east. On the same day, positioned in government-controlled Prychepylivka (50km north-west of Luhansk), the SMM heard five undetermined explosions and about ten bursts of heavy-machine-gun fire, all 5-8km south-east.

The SMM continued tomonitor the disengagement process and to pursue full access to the disengagement areas of Stanytsia Luhanska (16km north-east of Luhansk), Zolote (60km west of Luhansk) and Petrivske (41km south of Donetsk), as foreseen in theFramework Decision of the Trilateral Contact Group relating to disengagement of forces and hardwareof 21 September 2016. The SMMs access remained restricted but the Mission was able to partially monitor them.*

On 1 May, positioned about 140m south of the Stanytsia Luhanska bridge, the SMM heard three shots of small-arms fire 0.5-0.7km north-east and what were assessed as the consequent impacts 60-70m east of its position. Both the outgoing shots and the impacts were assessed as inside the disengagement area. The SMM left the area immediately. The SMM informed the Joint Centre for Control and Co-ordination (JCCC) about the incident and requested that it follow up.

On 1 May, positioned north of LPR-controlled Pervomaisk (58km west of Luhansk), the SMM heard five explosions at least 2km west, assessed as outgoing rounds of multiple launch rocket system (MLRS) (BM-21_Grad_, 122mm). Positioned north-west of the disengagement area near Zolote (60km north-west of Luhansk), the SMM heard three undetermined explosion 8-10km west-south-west. All the ceasefire violations were assessed as outside the disengagement area.

The SMM continued to monitor thewithdrawal of weapons, in implementation of the Memorandum, the Package of Measures and its Addendum.

In violation of withdrawal lines in non-government-controlled areas, the SMM again observed, on 1 May, seven MLRS (BM-21), seven self-propelled howitzers (2S1Gvozdika, 122mm), ten towed howitzers (five D-30Lyagushka, 122mm; and five 2A65Msta-B, 152mm), and seven tanks (T-72) at an aerodrome in the south-eastern outskirts of Luhansk city; and one tank (T-64) near Nikishyne (60km north-east of Donetsk).

The SMM observed weapons that could not be verified as withdrawn, as their storage does not comply with the criteria set in the 16 October 2015 notification. On 1 May, in government-controlled areas, the SMM observed that eight holding areas continued to be abandoned with the following weapons missing: 51 towed howitzers (33 2A65 and 18 2A36Giatsint-B, 152mm) and 30 tanks (T-64).

The SMM observed anarmoured combat vehicle[2]and new trenches in the security zone. In government-controlled areas the SMM saw again on 1 May an armoured personnel carrier (BTR-4) near Makarove (19km north-east of Luhansk).

In non-government-controlled areas, 1km south-west of Sentianivka, the SMM observed newly dug trenches of at least 10m in length located 5m from the road. The SMM had not seen the trenches during its last patrol in the area on 26 April.

The SMM continued to monitor thesituation of civilians living near the contact line. Ten residents in LPR-controlled areas north and north-west of Luhansk city, including Kruta Hora, Raivka, Vesela Hora and Zhovte (17 and 18km north-west of Luhansk, respectively) and Obozne (19km north of Luhansk) separately told the SMM that water was being regularly supplied. (SeeSMM Daily Report 14 April 2017).

The SMM monitored twoborder areas currently not under government control. On 1 May, at a border crossing point in Dovzhanskyi (84km south-east of Luhansk), in about one hour, the SMM saw 20 civilian cars (eleven with Ukrainian licence plates, eight with Russian Federation licence plates and one with DPR plates), one covered truck with Ukrainian licence plates, one bus (marked Krasnyi Luch-Rostov, carrying about 50 people) and 13 pedestrians exit Ukraine. It also observed 19 civilian cars (ten with Russian Federation, eight with Ukrainian and one with Georgian licence plates), two covered trucks (one with Ukrainian and one with Belarusian licence plates) and 16 pedestrians enter Ukraine.

At the border crossing point in Izvaryne (52km south-east of Luhansk), in about one hour, the SMM saw 19 civilian cars (ten with Ukrainian licence plates, seven with Russian Federation licence plates, two with DPR plates), five covered trucks (three with Russian Federation, one with Ukrainian and one with Belarusian licence plates), one bus with Ukrainian licence plates (with a sign Pervomaisk-Moscow, carrying about 50 people) and twelve pedestrians in a queue to exit Ukraine.

The SMM monitoredgatherings and events on the occasion of 1 May in Kyiv, Kharkiv, Dnipro and Odessa. In Kyiv, the SMM observed two separate gatherings marking 1 May: one with about 1,000 people, including families with children, around the Independence Square, while about 2,500 people (mostly women 50-70 years old) gathered around Parliament and Mariinskyi Park. During the Missions presence, no incidents were observed.

The SMM continued monitoring in Kherson, Ivano-Frankivsk and Chernivtsi.

*Restrictions of SMMs freedom of movement or other impediments to fulfilment of its mandate

The SMMs monitoring and freedom of movement are restricted by security hazards and threats, including risks posed by mines,unexploded ordnance (UXO) and other impediments which vary from day to day. The SMMs mandate provides for safe and secure access throughout Ukraine. All signatories of the Package of Measures have agreed on the need for this safe and secure access, that restriction of the SMMs freedom of movement constitutes a violation, and on the need for rapid response to these violations. They have also agreed that the JCCC should contribute to such response and co-ordinate mine clearance.

Denial of access:

Delay:

[1]Please seethe annexed tableforcomplete breakdown of the ceasefire violations as well as map of the Donetsk and Luhansk regions marked with locations featured in this report.

[2]This hardware is not proscribed by the provisions of the Minsk agreements on the withdrawal of weapons.

Contacts

Alexandra Taylor

Head of Press and Public Information Unit

OSCE Special Monitoring Mission to Ukraine

26 Turhenievska Street

01054 Kyiv

Ukraine

Mobile: +380 67 650 31 57

alexandra.taylor@osce.org

smm-media@osce.org

Mariia Aleksevych

Senior Press Assistant

OSCE Special Monitoring Mission to Ukraine

26 Turhenievska Street

01054 Kyiv

Ukraine

Office: +380 44 392 0832

Mobile: +380 50 381 5192

Mobile: +380 93 691 6790

mariia.aleksevych@osce.org

smm-media@osce.org

Originally posted here:
Latest from the OSCE Special Monitoring Mission to Ukraine (SMM), based on information received as of 19:30, 1 May ... - Reliefweb

Turkey-Ukraine defense industry ties are booming – Al-Monitor – Al-Monitor

Ukraine's Foreign Minister Pavlo Klimkin (R) and his Turkish counterpart, Mevlut Cavusoglu, attend a news conference in Kiev, Ukraine, Feb. 10, 2017.(photo byREUTERS/Valentyn Ogirenko)

Author:Metin Gurcan Posted May 1, 2017

It looks likeUkraine is becomingTurkey's new go-to defense technology partner.Strategic ties between Turkey and Ukraine in the fields of defense and military cooperation are flourishing. The latest development was the April 19-22visit to Turkey of the commander of the Ukrainian navy, Vice Adm. Ihor Voronchenko, and his delegation.

TranslatorTimur Gksel

Voronchenko visited Golcuk shipyards, where Turkey built theAda-class SW corvettes TCG(Turkiye Cumhuriyeti Gemisi,or "Ship of the Turkish Republic")Heybeliada,Buyukada and Burgazada and delivered them to the Turkish navy in 2011 and 2013; the TCG Kinaliada is under construction there. Turkish and Ukrainian navy personnel participated in the Eurasia Partnership Maritime Interdiction Operations held April 3-7 in Ukraines port ofOdessa.The Turkish navy visited Batum,Georgia;Novorossiysk,Russia;Constanta,Romania; andVarna,Bulgaria, and heldjoint air defense exercises with the Ukrainian navy at Odessa.

Meanwhile, high-level defense industry visits between Turkey and Ukraine have become frequent. The volume of trade between the countries, which was $3.7 billionin 2016, is expected to reach $20 billion in five years now that they have signed afree-trade accord. Their mutual defense industry projects involve satellite technology, warships and navigation systems, radars, engine technology, phased space rockets and ballistic missilesystems, solid fuel rocket engines, long-range ballistic missiles and even cruise missiles.

Recently, when Austria restrictedtechnological support for the engine of the Altay mainbattle tank Turkey designed and is producing using mainly local technologies, Ankara turned to Ukraine.Ukrainian Prime Minister Vladimir Groysmanvisited Turkey on March 14, and the two countries signed a preliminary memorandumof understanding in whichUkraine is proposing its 6TD-3 enginefor the Turkish tank.

What encouraged this rapidly developing defense industry and military technology cooperation between Turkey and Ukraine?

The first reasonis geographical: Unlike other NATO and European countries, Turkey is a neighborof both Russia and Ukraine and is therefore always careful to balance its relations with both.

The other reason is Black Sea geopolitics. According to Devrim Yaylali, an expert on the naval defense industry who spoke with Al-Monitor, although the Black Sea appears to be an inland sea, it still has vibrant, heavy traffic coming from the rivers of Europe and Russia and also from Turkeys straits. Russia's invasions ofGeorgia in 2008 and Crimea in 2014 have added to the complexity of security politics of the Black Sea.Ukraine has a long Black Sea coast, andthe country's contribution to Black Sea security is important for Turkey.

For Ukraine, Turkeys role in restraining Russia in the Black Sea and supporting Ukraines membership in NATO are important assets.

Yaylali added: Turkey doesnt want any other navies in the Black Seaother than those of [coastal]countries. That is why it is crucial for Turkey to maintain good relations particularly with naval and coast guard forces of all [coastal]states. This was demonstrated by the Turkish navys visit to all the Black Sea countries" during the 2017 Sea Star exercises.

Another motive for Turkey and Ukraine to cooperate: Both countries want to share military technology to expandand strengthen theirnational defense industries.Neither has a self-sufficient defense industry.

Yaylali says Ukraine's navy is weak. He explained: Since the collapse of the Soviet Union, Ukraine has not added any new vessels to its navy. After Russias occupation of Crimea in 2014 and its seizure of some of the Ukrainian navy vessels, Ukraine doesnt have a navy to speak of. Before 2014, Ukrainian warships had gone to the Mediterranean and twice to the Gulf of Aden to support NATO operations. But today, for Ukrainian ships to move out of the Black Sea is only a dream.

To defend its naval interests, Ukraine will haveto make a major investment. Itcould buysecondhand military vessels from NATO countriesor build them in Ukraine. This explains Ukraines interest in the experience Turkey has gained in constructing warships locally. Turkey can provide Ukraine with technical support to design and produce a warship in its own shipyards. Turkey can also provide standard NATO weapons systems, sensors and radars for vessels Ukraine can build.

Turkeys interest in the Ukrainian defense industry is basically in satellite technologies, diesel engines, ballistic missile solid fuel engines and cruisemissiles. It is interesting to learn, based on their joint projects,that Turkey is particularly interested in cruise missiles.

According to defense industry expert Arda Mevlutoglu, Ukraine has advanced capabilityin electronic warfare, radar technology and engines. Mevlutoglu said Turkeys most urgentneeds from Ukraine are diesel engines.

When Turkeys sale of self-propelled howitzers to Azerbaijan didnt materialize after Germany, for political reasons, blocked sales of engines for the howitzers Turkey began looking to Ukraine as the alternative source of engines, Mevlutoglu added.

Ukraine also hassignificant knowledge and experience in basic sciences such as mathematics, physics andchemistry, and their applications. Turkey seriously lags in these fields. The two countries last year launched projects to develop joint sonar systems. They also havestudent exchange programs, especially in the engineering fields needed in the defense industry.

Of course, not to be ignored is Ukraine's geopolitical importance;most of the natural gas Ankara buys from Russia reaches Turkey via pipelines passing through Ukraine.

What is becoming apparent is that Ukraine is the nearest and most willing potential partner to help Turkey overcome the interruptions in military technology transferfrom the United States and Europebecause offrequent political disagreements. However,Ukraine suffered tremendous economic and human resources losses with ongoing clashes since 2014 and Russias annexation of Crimea,"Mevlutoglu said."Much of its defense industry was either looted by Russian intelligence services or simply fell into Russian hands because they were in Crimea. That is why we have to wonder if Ukraine can deliver its promises of strategic cooperation. That is why it would be wiser if Ankara focuses on what Ukraine can do instead of what it promises.

Read More: http://www.al-monitor.com/pulse/originals/2017/05/turkey-ukraine-cooperation-defense-booming.html

View original post here:
Turkey-Ukraine defense industry ties are booming - Al-Monitor - Al-Monitor

Ukraine ambassador: Belarus enables necessary conditions for Ukrainian migrants – Belarus News (BelTA)

MINSK, 2 May (BelTA) Belarus enables the necessary conditions for Ukrainian migrants, Ambassador Extraordinary and Plenipotentiary of Ukraine to Belarus Igor Kizim said in an interview with the Belarus 1 TV channel, BelTA has learned.

I would like to thank our fraternal nation, the Belarusian state and the Belarusian president personally for what is being done for the people temporarily displaced from Ukraine. It is very important to help them and create the conditions to live and work here. Belarus provides such possibilities, Igor Kizim noted.

The Ukrainian diplomat commended the current state of Ukraine-Belarus trade and economic cooperation. According to him, it is showing positive results.

Igor Kizim also touched upon the topical issue of the Minsk process on the settlement of the Ukrainian crisis and the role of the Minsk platform. The ambassador believes that Minsk II has not run its course yet. Those who do not want peace may not be comfortable with the Minsk platform. I think that the Minsk process has not yet been exhausted. It has proved its topicality. I have taken part in the work of the trilateral contact group and in a Normandy format meeting. Although difficult the process is moving forward. All the sides scrupulously defend their interests but at the same time manage to find compromises, Igor Kizim underlined. He also remarked that the talks about Minsk III are untimely.

More here:
Ukraine ambassador: Belarus enables necessary conditions for Ukrainian migrants - Belarus News (BelTA)

Seven suspected illegal immigrants from Ukraine discovered on a … – Telegraph.co.uk

The five men and a woman were detained by UK Border Force staff who were lying in wait after tracking the yacht across the North Sea. They were all later deported

CCTV which covers the quay and the riverside at Orford was upgraded in 2015 with a grant of 2,660 from Suffolk's Police and Crime Commissioner, Tim Passmore.

He said that the grant was aimed at reducing petty crime and discouraging the use of the quay as "a drop-off point for illegalimmigrants".

Mr Passmore added: "Suffolk's coastline is vulnerable to people-trafficking, as is the whole of the south and east coast, so we made sure the CCTV system was suitable for the UK Border Force, which is responsible for the security of our coastline, to obtain evidence if required.

"Whilst Suffolk Constabulary is not responsible for border control, it is clear we need to work together to protect our coastline.

"Orford Quay is an isolated area so it is important we do all we can to reassure local residents that their community is safe particularly during the hours of darkness."

Last September six suspected illegalimmigrantswere smuggled on a yacht which landed them at nearby Bawdsey.

The group of men and women were seen getting into a Range Rover and then dropped off in a pub car park at Bromeswell near Woodbridge.

CCTV images of the car park showed them fleeing out of the car as soon as it stopped.

Stuart Bacon, 84, who owns a craft shop in Orford said last year: "This area has been used for smuggling for hundreds of years.

More here:
Seven suspected illegal immigrants from Ukraine discovered on a ... - Telegraph.co.uk

Following earlier snub, Ukraine’s Jewish PM to visit Israel in May – The Times of Israel

Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu will meet with his Ukrainian counterpart during an upcoming visit to Israel next month, after a previously scheduled visit was nixed in protest over Kievs support for a UN Security Council resolution against Israeli settlements, the Foreign Ministry said Sunday.

Volodymyr Groysman, who became Ukraines first Jewish prime minister last year, will arrive for a two-day visit in Israel on May 14, in what Hebrew media reports said will mark a formal end to the tensions between Jerusalem and Kiev.

The Ukrainian prime minister was originally scheduled to arrive in Israel for a two-day visit in December, that was set to include meetings with Netanyahu, President Reuven Rivlin and other top officials.

However, after Ukraine voted in favor of United Nations Security Council Resolution 2334 in late December, which labeled Israeli settlements as having no legal validity and a flagrant violation under international law, Jerusalem disinvited Groysman to protest Kievs support for the resolution, which Israel denounced as shameful.

Following the cancellation of Groysmans visit, Ukraine reacted angrily to the slight by summoning Israels ambassador, Eli Belotserkovsky, to the Foreign Ministry in Kiev for a dressing-down.

However, a February phone call between Netanyahu and Ukrainian President Petro Poroshenko effectively put an end to tensions between Jerusalem and Kiev, with a statement from the Prime Ministers Office at the time saying the two leaders agreed to resume their efforts to further strengthen the friendship between Israel and Ukraine.

Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu speaks during a special plenary session held in honor of visiting Ukrainian President Petro Poroshenko (R) at the Knesset, Jerusalem, on December 23, 2015. (Flash90/Hadas Parush)

In the wake of the passage of the Security Council measure, Ukraine defended its vote in favor of Resolution 2234 by hinting at its own conflict with Russia as a driving force behind the decision.

Without explicitly mentioning Moscows annexation of Crimea and a civil war in the countrys east with Russian-backed separatists, the Ukrainian Foreign Ministry said it experienced itself the tragic consequences brought by the violation of international law, effectively drawing a parallel between Israeli building in the West Bank and East Jerusalem and Russian policies.

After the measure was passed, the Israeli government took a number of retaliatory measures against countries that supported its passage, including an official dressing-down of the Security Council members ambassadors to Israel.

The Security Council resolution, which passed 14-0 with only the United States abstaining, also called on Israel to immediately and completely cease all settlement activities in the occupied Palestinian territory, including East Jerusalem, while also expressing its grave concern that continuing Israeli settlement activities are dangerously imperiling the viability of the two-state solution.

See the rest here:
Following earlier snub, Ukraine's Jewish PM to visit Israel in May - The Times of Israel