Studies show that great workplaces enjoy lower turnover and    better financial performance than industry peers. But do these    companies really achieve greater financial success over the    long haul? Here I'll examine whether companies praised by their    employees also receive applause from shareholders.  
    The listFortune magazine    publishes a list of the "100 Best Companies to Work For" every    year. In order to make the list, the companies are evaluated    using a model developed by the Great Place to Work Institute.    The model claims that employees value six attributes: trust,    credibility, fairness, pride, respect, and camaraderie. The    companies are rated based on what actions they take to foster    these attributes in their work environments.  
    Just less than half of the companies on the list operate as    either private businesses or non-profit entities. Some private    businesses, such as Wegmans Food Markets, Container Store, and    Edward Jones, have materialized near the top of the list for    more than a decade. For my cursory analysis, I concentrated on    the publically traded companies.  
    Crunching the numbersFor the 51 publically    traded companies on the list, I homed in on the ones that    consistently secured spots on the Fortune list over    the past decade. That left me with a tidy group of 13    companies: five tech companies, four consumer goods producers,    two financial-services providers, one retailer, and one    telecom. I compared the performance of the five tech stocks to    PowerShares QQQ, a surrogate for the NASDAQ    100 that takes dividend reinvestment into account, over the    one-year, three-year, five-year, and 10-year periods. I    compared the remaining eight non-tech stocks to the    SPDR S&P 500 (NYSE:    SPY) ,    which I used as a proxy for the S&P 500.  
    The tech stocks outperformed the PowerShares ETF in the    one-year and 10-year periods. Over the 10-year period, the    basket of tech stocks outperformed the PowerShares ETF by    nearly 60 percentage points -- 183% total return, versus 125%.  
    For the non-tech stocks, the SPDR ETF actually outperformed in    each period except the 10-year period, when the basket returned    107% total return, versus 58% for the SPDR ETF.  
    Blue ribbons    Google (Nasdaq: GOOG) --    so prevalent it's a verb -- secured the coveted No. 1 spot on    Fortune's list. Applauded by employees for its nap    rooms and onsite haircuts, the leading Internet search provider    grew its workforce by 33% last year. And its stock performance    has been nothing shy of amazing: It has quadrupled the    performance of the PowerShares ETF since Google went public in    2004. The advent of Google Drive, the company's foray into    cloud computing, positions the company well for the future.  
    Feel-good food retailer Whole Foods Market    (Nasdaq: WFM) also    displayed impressive growth. Amazingly, Whole Foods pays 100%    of its employees' health care premiums. The company posted    performance five times better than the SPDR ETF during the    one-year, three-year, and 10-year periods -- and an incredible    20 times better than the SPDR ETF during the five-year period.    This grocer, known for good deeds among its employees and    customers, continues to post impressive same-stores sales    numbers and is positioned well for further growth.  
    Not too shabbyToymaker    Mattel's (Nasdaq:    MAT) stock    appreciated significantly over the past decade with a 119%    total return, pummeling the SPDR ETF's 58% total return. Mattel    employees benefit from a compressed workweek schedule and    on-site child care. Mattel continues to     focus diligently on its international expansion and has    been rewarded success, as overseas sales grew nearly 12% in    2011. And since the stock price recently pulled back, consider    adding shares while the stock's on sale.  
    You gotta be kidding meDespite its recent    floggings in the press, I was shocked to find Goldman    Sachs (NYSE: GS) not    only resting comfortably in the No. 33 spot for this year, but    consistently appearing on the Fortune list. Not    surprisingly, the biggest benefit cited was the pay; the    average annual salary for a non-exempt professional employee is    $139,200. The company lost a lot of ground in the one-year,    three-year, and five-year periods, when its stock price dropped    precipitously due to poor business decisions and a grave    macroeconomic environment. Over the 10-year period, the    financial-services company saw a total return of 60%, which    only slightly edged out the SPDR ETF's 58% return during the    same time period.  
More here:
Do Happier Employees Yield Healthier Stocks?