Why Do So Many Blacks Relate To The Stripper, Whore, Thug & Gang Culture?
follow me on twitter http://www.twitter.com/tjsotomayor
Read this article:
Why Do So Many Blacks Relate To The Stripper, Whore, Thug & Gang Culture?
follow me on twitter http://www.twitter.com/tjsotomayor
Read this article:
Why Do So Many Blacks Relate To The Stripper, Whore, Thug & Gang Culture?
call 347-989-8310
Read this article:
2nd Why Do So Many Blacks Relate To The Stripper, Whore, Thug & Gang Culture
Gloria Marie Steinem was born on March 25th, 1934 in Toledo, Ohio. Her mother Ruth, was of Scottish and German descent, and her father Leo, was the son of Jewish immigrants from Germany and Poland.
The Steinem's lived and traveled in a trailer, while Leo plied his trade as a traveling 'antiques dealer'. Needless to say, oftentimes the family lived 'hand to mouth'. Before Gloria was born, Ruth had a nervous breakdown when she was 34. This made her an invalid and prone to delusional bouts that sometimes turned violent. Ruth spent long periods in and out of sanitariums, before she and Leo separated when Gloria was ten.
When Leo went to California to find work, he left Gloria and her mother to live by themselves. Ruth tried desperately to get employed, but her mental condition often resulted in her never being able to keep a job over the long haul. Gloria felt her mother's inability to stay employed was the result of an american chauvinism towards working women, and she saw the medical community's lack of empathy towards her mother, as evidence of the same.
On top of this, Gloria's paternal grandmother, Pauline, was chairwoman of an educational committee calling itself the 'National Woman's Suffrage Association', and Pauline was also a delegate to the 1908 'International Council of Women'.
These incidences are said to have contributed to Gloria's 'belly fire' when it came to combating social injustices against women. This set her on a path towards becoming a prominent 'spokesperson' for the american 'Women's liberation' and 'Feminist' movements.
Now, what the keepers of the american social order don't want us to know, is that Gloria rose to political prominence by means of being an agent for the CIA. Her spying on Marxist student's in europe, and her disruptions of their meetings, was something she was tasked to do by them...and to put it more plainly, there was nothing organic about Gloria's rise to becoming an american political figurehead.
Not only did the CIA help her become a celebrity, but they also made her editor of 'Ms.' magazine, which was also directly funded by them.
Now, what neither Gloria nor the american public realizes, is the real agenda behind the 'Woman's liberation' and 'Feminist' movements. To make a long story short, white fascists funded these movements not to empower women, but to get them into the workforce, because those same fascists stated how they couldn't TAX half the country if women were staying home and being housewives.
Moreover, these women's movements had an added bonus for the white fascist agenda, which was this: With BOTH parents out of the home, white fascists would have an easier time conditioning their kids through TV, which would ultimately become their babysitters.
Oh, you wily white fascists...
Now, fast forward nearly two decades after the new millennium...
A large number of men see the objectives of 'Women's lib', morphing into an america that's doing its level best to become an oppressive force against them.
Many men feel that what's being mainstreamed in america, is a cultural paradigm where women aren't held accountable for their actions. Meaning, a woman can genuinely be a bad mother, but in a divorce settlement, nine times out of ten, she'll get rewarded alimony and custody of her children. And sometimes a woman may genuinely consent to sex with a man, but if she feels slighted by him in any way, she can yell rape, and nine times out of ten, that man will wind up in the penitentiary system, until he can prove his innocence.
As a result of this, the 'Men Going Their Own Way', or 'MGTOW' movement was born.
Now, I can somewhat understand where these men are coming from, in terms of laws being unfairly in favor of women, but for Black men reading this and belonging to this movement, I hope you're smart enough to realize, THIS MOVEMENT HAS NOTHING TO OFFER YOU! JUST LIKE WHITE FEMINISM HAS NOTHING TO OFFER BLACK WOMEN!
Let me explain...
The MGTOW movement is mainly comprised of white men who've got two things in common...THEY'RE HEART-BROKEN AND THEY'RE CLOSETED HOMOSEXUALS!
See, at the nucleus of the MGTOW message, is that women arecompletely untrustworthy, unscrupulous, over-sexed and self-involved, and they've been made this way by the american status quo. MGTOW men say the only thing they can count on any woman being, is conniving to a fault. But what they're not seeing, is how adopting this ideology is keeping them in a permanent state of adolescence.
Now, let me expound on that point...
Let's start with this fact...EVERYONE GETS THEIR HEART BROKEN! That's just par for the course of being human.
But in terms of manhood, what separates men from boys, is when a man experiences heart-break, he LEARNS from it and determines he'll make better choices in the future. When a boy gets his heart broken, he stays stuck in those emotions and doesn't value the the lesson(s) it taught him.
And let me put it in more layman's terms, just cause you get your heart-broken by one woman, doesn't mean you should cast aspersions on the whole of womanhood. That's stupid.
One thing MGTOW men should ask themselves is this: Behind my last heart-break,DID I LEARN WHO I'M ATTRACTING AND WHO I'M ATTRACTED TO?
And if you can't answer this question, then you heart-break will have been in vain.
Now, for the Black men reading this, here's three more reasons why you should disassociate yourself from this social order.
One, this movement is yet another attempt to keep Black men and women apart. PERIOD! If Black men follow the edicts of this insipid collective, they'll more than likely swear off any serious relationships with a Black woman for good. Now, you might be thinking, well, if the majority of MGTOW members are white men, why would they have any influence over the Black Diaspora?
The simple answer is, cause the majority of the world doesn't LOOK LIKE THEM!
The majority of the world is Black and brown. So white fascists know any cultural movement that gets mainstreamed, has the potential to effect more of us, than them.
Two, this movement is yet another attempt by white fascists to mainstream homosexuality. You already know the implications this has on our Diaspora fam! If Black men swear off women for good, they'll be less of us for white fascists to deal with. And again, if you're wondering why I think this will affect more Black people than white, go back to my aforementioned statement about which kind of person is mostly populating this world.
And three, this generation of white men has no business feeling oppressed in any capacity, especially in this world's 'developed countries'. To any white man reading this, if you really want social change, why don't you get in the ears of your white male peers in government and make some. This smacks to me of gay white bigotry, in so much as, gay white men want to be seen as an oppressed minority, yet they're still some of the biggest bigots on the planet, especially when it comes to Black men...and on top of this, they still enjoy the white male privilege whether they know it or not.
Also, this is the reason white fascists have (Uncle) Tommy Sotomayor extolling the virtues of this movement. Remember, celebrity is nothing but a white fascist construct used as a means of population control. So who better than this buck-dancin', certified pre-owned, self-hating negro, to sing this movement's praises. Especially when he owes them his celebrity.
Also, remember what I've said about a Black person's most valuable asset when it comes to anything involving the white fascist social order, and that's DISCERNMENT!
As a 'conscious', or 'deeper-thinking' Black person, it behooves you to see beneath the superficial layers of what this group is offering, to qualify whether it will help or hurt you.
So brothas...if and when a MGTOW recruitment agent pays you a visit, I hope this post shows you, how you should show him the door...and how afterwards, you should slam it in his face.
Trust me, you'll be glad ya' did!
Later...
MontUHURU Mimia
Here is the original post:
The Cinematic Symbolism blog
Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images
by Breitbart News13 Mar 20160
Cruz suggested Trumps campaign bears responsibility for violent protesters threatening Trump and his supporters, as social media revealed images of a policeman bleeding from his head and anecdotes of peaceful attendees terrorized by agitators. As reported by Breitbarts Katie McHugh, this statement angered many Cruz supporters:
I think a campaign bears responsibility for creating an environment, when the candidate urges supporters to engage in physical violence to punch people in the face. The predictable consequence of that is that it escalates and today is unlikely to be the last such instance. We earlier today in St. Louis over thirty arrested. Thats not how our politics should occur, Cruz said Friday. You know, the City of Chicago in 1968 saw some ugly days when politics descended into hatred and incivility and even violence and it is my hope that in 2016 that we can appeal to our better angels and avoid going down that road once again.
Coulter said Cruzs statement to Fox was evidence of a unified oligarchy, especially resonant after reports of a secret confab between elites from the Republican establishmentand the tech world gathering to create an anti-Trump electoral strategy just days before the Chicago mayhem.
Big Government, Big Journalism, 2016 Presidential Race, Donald Trump, FOX NEWS, Ted Cruz, Ann Coulter
View original post here:
Ann Coulter: Ted Cruz, Fox News 'Traitors,' Formed 'Unified ...
Jason, you said: If a couple decides to bring a life into this world, then that is not a responsibility that they should just walk away from if the relationship ends.
I agree with that 100%!
However, I disagree with you100% when it comes to locking someone up for non payment. I dont give a rats if it is for child support or anything else.
You stated: Because there are those jackasses out there that wont care what you do to them as punishment.
I agree with that 100% too, which means locking them up will have zero effect on them and the money thieving govt will still never see any money, neither will the woman, so its probably best she gets off her backside and go earn the money.
And I want to make something clear here. If the woman has a job and is earning enough money to raise the child, then they should not have to chase the father up for money. SHE DOESNT NEED IT! Especially if the mother is preventing access. She deserves not a bloody cent.
In fact she should be put in prison for committing a heinous act against an innocent child victim!
The only reason they do chase a father up for child support when the mother is already earning enough, is purely a de facto alimony. Nothing else!
Too many men and women have been demanding that MEN are locked up for every conceivable crime, no matter what it is or who it affects. That is an abuse against mens human rights and it has to stop.
I agree with Paul Elam when he said that a vote of guilty as a juror in a rape case, would not happen. I am the same. The whole process of collecting evidence right the way through to what the judge has forced the jury to consider and to not consider, is so full of lies, deception and manipulation, that there is no way anyone could safely come to a guilty verdict.
The same applies to calling any man a deadbeat then locking him up, because he resolutely refuses to pay the extortion money to the woman.
There are a myriad of Tees to cross and Eyes to dot, before you could even consider if the father is a mongrel or not. The likelihood that the child is not his, is very high. Can you believe anything that comes out of the mouth of the mother?
The doubt is there my friend.
Until they clean up the whole system by getting rid of the family.sorry, divorce court, child support depts and alimony payments, then there is no way any man can be expected to pay anything and neither should he be punished if he chooses to not pay.
And let me point out as my parting comment as I hit the fart sack down here in the southern hemisphere.
The number of men who would be that cold that they would knowingly abandon their own flesh and blood, would be less than some ridiculous number like .0000000001% of the male population. And yep, thats a ridiculous guess!
On the contrary though, a very large proportion of mothers would abandon their own flesh and blood to save their own skin and they would not give a seconds thought at doing it either. They know they can punch out another kid anytime they like. Fathers on the other hand, cant do a damn thing without the permission of a woman.
So every child is worth much more to men than they are for women!
Original post:
Tommy Sotomayor says No One Should Ever Be Arrested For Not ...