Archive for the ‘Uncategorized’ Category

New technology helps plow drivers adjust to conditions

Interstate-29 from Fargo to the South Dakota border is back open after being closed by the snowstorm. To open the road the North Dakota DOT is using a whole new set of tools.

As North Dakota DOT plow hit the highways today some of them have an extra set of eyes traveling along.

Bruce Nord North Dakota DOT: They're all in line. This is a new photo.

Some of the plows are now equipped with cameras that allow supervisors back at the base to watch the road with them.

Bruce Nord: "We know what it's like down there right now, and its just another tool."

It's not just to check on road conditions, it can help make decisions that keep the drivers safe.

Bruce Nord: "Ive got some guys that, it's really, really got to get bad before they pull the pin and go back to the barn or they'd just stay out there.

Technology is not only helping the DOT monitor road conditions it's also helping them decide when to apply salt and chemicals. Tyler Rupp's plow is equipped with a GPS, but it's not like the one that's on our cars.

Tyler Rupp ND DOT Plow Driver: It doesn't guide me but it tracks what I do, so how long it takes me to plow, how much material I put down. All that goes into data.

That GPS data is combined with other factors.

Here is the original post:
New technology helps plow drivers adjust to conditions

'Homemade? I've had my fill of cupcake fetishism, twee polka-dot aprons and smug TV bakers'

Until last week, I had no idea that something called a Pie Shield existed. I was flicking through a Lakeland catalogue I found on a colleague's desk when I spotted a cherry-red segmented silicone ring. "New product!" exclaimed the accompanying text. "The crust is always the first part of your pie to burn," it went on to explain. "So instead of spending time fashioning foil to try and protect it, place one of these reusable silicone Pie Shields around the edge of your pastry before baking and you'll have beautiful golden-brown results with no sign of scorching."

Having never made a pie, I can't tell how troubling a scorched crust might be. But to someone out there, it must be quite a trial the smallest sized Perfect Crust Pie Shield costs 7.99. And given that you could buy two short-crust steak pies in Sainsbury's for 3, each with a perfectly golden unsinged pastry margin around the outside, why on earth would you need to go and buy a dedicated crust protector?

But then, I would say that. Because, between you and me, I don't really believe in baking. I'll eat the fruits of other people's ovens and I'm very fond of bread, buns and baps but making them myself? When there are at least seven perfectly good shops that sell baked goods within a two-minute walk from my front door? No, thank you.

No thank you to the trolley dash that every occasional baker will know, where you can't remember the difference between baking powder and bicarb, buy both, plus all the extras you've forgotten you have at home (alive with weevils, mind), some muffin cases, a sheaf of greaseproof paper and end up spending 40 on eight leaden fairy cakes. No thank you to the zero-tolerance "science" of baking. Screw up a tsp or tbsp and you end up with an inedible bread Frisbee that even the birds (and those other denizens of the back garden, rats) won't touch.

And I'd also like to politely decline the invitations from every TV channel and bookshop to give baking a bash. Having managed to dodge both series of The Great British Bake Off, I now feel as though I'm under siege. In January, the photogenic Herbert siblings took to TV screens with a series devoted to baking accompanied by a cookbook, The Fabulous Baking Boys. A 13-part series recently started on the Good Food Channel featuring "young, sexy" (no, Food Channel, they really, really aren't) chefs Paul Hollywood and James Martin "delving into the world of speciality breads and the food that goes with them", while later this month, The Big Book of Baking by the Hairy Bikers hits shelves and screens, followed by the second series of Baking Mad on Channel 4.

The promotional material informing me about the latter needlessly points out that British baking is booming. With all this TV evangelising, is there any wonder? Caster sugar sales are up by 7 per cent, icing sugar by 14 per cent and vanilla extract by 20 per cent. The market intelligence wonks at Mintel saw all this coming in a 2006 report, which predicted (warned?) that sales of home-baking products would reach 550m by 2011. By 2010 it had actually reached 576m, no doubt because of the 28 per cent of us baking from scratch using raw ingredients at least once a week.

Cooking anything from scratch is, of course, a good thing. Well done that 28 per cent. But might now be a good time to take a small step away from the butter cream? I don't mind what anyone gets up to in their own kitchens, but I do mind the baking-is-a-virtue mindset. A pile of homemade cakes is every bit as obesity-causing as a stack of shop-bought ones. Yes, they will have fewer mystery ingredients (mmm, corn syrup) and they will taste lovely fresh from the oven, but come on, we have spent hundreds of years trying to escape from the tyranny of being chained to the stove. It feels a bit Marie Antoinette-ish, this playing at baking. Or maybe it reminds me of Valium-numbed1950s' housewives baking endlessly because there was nothing else they could do.

It's the Fifties' housewife vibe that also bothers me about all the pastel-hued, labour-saving baking devices that sit alongside things like the Pie Shield in kitchenware shops (you wouldn't need to labour-save if you just went to Greggs, after all). It's the cake-levelling doo-dah that gives you an even surface for your icing. It's the terminally twee stamps for home bakers that imprint the message "homemade" on any biscuits they craft, even though everyone can tell they're homemade because they look rubbish. It's the unnerving feel of silicone baking moulds in the shape of rabbits. It's polka-dotted aprons and retro-style mixers and all the other lifestyle baking tat that manufacturers and marketeers are pushing. Every time I see a cupcake stand, a part of me dies inside.

Baking doesn't have to be this way. Even a flour-dodger like me has a great deal of admiration for those who are pushing the boundaries of what you can do with a bit of Battenberg. I watch the Food Channel show Charm City Cakes and marvel at what can be done with icing sugar, imagination, some sponge and a few wooden struts. Then there's the evil genius of British creative Miss Cakehead, a PR and events expert turned Dr Frankenstein offondant. She provides cakes for big-name clients that are more Nightmare on Elm Street than I Dream of Jeannie. "I want to challenge the medium with cake you can get away with anything," she says, while telling me about how to decorate a cake to make it look blood-spattered, as well as the edible beach she's working on for this year's Cake and Bake Show in September. "We made an edible autopsy out of cake and got a pathologist to come in and dissect it." That's my kind of cake making. She is also no fan of the all-conquering cupcake, either. "There was a horrendous outbreak of cupcakes suddenly becoming so trendy about five years ago. They're the equivalent of painting by numbers compared with Peter Blake." See her work at staypuft.cc or follow her antics on Twitter @miss_cakehead.

But if you love baking, you won't care what I think about it. For many people baking is useful, joyful, relaxing, fun. For some, it's life-saving: the chick-lit writer Marian Keyes published Saved by Cake: Over 80 Ways to Bake Yourself Happy last month, a very personal cookbook in which she reveals that in the throes of a nervous breakdown, she turned to cake-making: "Baking... gets me through. To be perfectly blunt about it, my choice sometimes is, I can kill myself or I can make a dozen cupcakes."

More:
'Homemade? I've had my fill of cupcake fetishism, twee polka-dot aprons and smug TV bakers'

Angelina Jolie leg sweeps the Internet – Video

29-02-2012 03:38 http://www.nma.tv On Oscar night, Angelina Jolie struck an awkward pose on-stage. She showed off her right leg through a slit in her dress. The move was judged instantly in the court of social media. The verdict probably wasn't what Jolie had in mind. A fake Twitter account claiming to belong to Jolie's leg was created. It now has over 26000 followers. In an Internet phenomenon known as "Legbombing," people are Photoshopping Jolie's leg onto other celebrities. But what if Angelina Jolie's leg becomes too powerful? What Internet meme will be able to stop it?

Excerpt from:
Angelina Jolie leg sweeps the Internet - Video

McCain: No Internet Takeover in GOP Cybersecurity Bill

Assuring potential critics that the government doesnt need to take over the Internet in order to protect it, Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz., joined a bevy of other Republican committee leaders on Thursday to introduce cybersecurity legislation.

The only government actions allowed by our bill are to get information voluntarily from the private sector and to share information back, McCain told reporters. We have no government monitoring, no government takeover of the Internet, and no government intrusions.

Lawmakers working on bills relating to the Internet are walking a fine line after the backlash over controversial antipiracy measures scuttled two bills in January. But McCains comments were also aimed at the Cybersecurity Act of 2012, recently introduced by the top members of the Senate Homeland Security, Intelligence, and Commerce committees.

McCain and the seven other cosponsors of the Strengthening and Enhancing Cybersecurity by Using Research, Education, Information, and Technology Act (SECURE IT) criticized the Cybersecurity Act as too heavy-handed and said their alternative bill takes a more industry-friendly approach to cybersecurity.

Now is not the time for Congress to be adding more government, more regulation, and more debt especially when it is far from clear that any of it will enhance our security, said Senate Intelligence Vice Chairman Saxby Chambliss, R-Ga. Our bill offers the right solution to improving our nations cybersecurity by encouraging collaboration, investment, and innovation.

Specifically, the SECURE IT Act would allow companies to voluntarily share information about cyberthreats; limit liability for companies that take steps to protect their networks; and limit the type of information that can be shared in order to protect privacy. The bill would also reform federal cybersecurity standards.

The proposals earned praise from some industry groups like USTelecom and the Internet Security Alliance, which called the bill not just a step in the right direction but several steps in the right direction.

McCain said he plans to offer his bill as a substitute when the Cybersecurity Act is brought to the floor sometime in the next few weeks. The extent of support for either bill is not clear, but the dueling legislation could split support from industry as well as complicate efforts to pass a matching bill in the House.

Homeland Security Chairman Joe Lieberman, ID-Conn., spearheaded an effort to develop and draft the comprehensive Cybersecurity Act of 2012, which, in addition to increasing information sharing, would give the Homeland Security Department more authority to make sure certain critical infrastructure is protected.

Lieberman and his cosponsors, Commerce Committee Chairman Jay Rockefeller, D-W.Va., Homeland Security Committee ranking member Susan Collins, R-Maine, and Intelligence Committee Chairwoman Dianne Feinstein, D-Calif., said they welcome the new proposals.

Read more:
McCain: No Internet Takeover in GOP Cybersecurity Bill

Fla. House votes to ban so-called Internet cafes

TALLAHASSEE, Fla. (AP) The Florida House on Thursday voted to shut down more than 1,000 storefront operations known as Internet cafes that sprouted across the state in the last five years.

Backers of the legislation say the measure will eliminate gambling operations that exploited a loophole in the law to set up shops that target the poor and the elderly in the state.

"These are truly the crack cocaine of gambling," said Rep. Scott Plakon, R-Longwood and sponsor of the bill (HB 3).

Internet cafes sell customers either phone cards or Internet time. But they also offer customers a chance to redeem electronic sweepstakes on computers that use software that mimics casino-styled games.

Sweepstakes such as those handed out by fast-food restaurants like McDonald's have been legal for decades. But the explosion of Internet cafes has triggered a debate about whether or not they are actually a form of illegal gambling. Some counties have tried to shut down the operations completely, while others have chosen to pass ordinances that regulate them.

Gov. Rick Scott, Attorney General Pam Bondi as well as prosecutors and sheriffs across the state have called for legislators to ban the operations.

But the push to ban the Internet cafes may go nowhere.

So far the Florida Senate has refused to move a Senate bill that calls for a ban.

Senators instead say they want to pass a bill that would regulate the cafes instead. They contend that banning the cafes now would result in the loss of thousands of jobs for those who now work at them.

But Plakon and other supporters of the ban warn that regulating the operations could threaten payments the state is now receiving from the Seminole Tribe of Florida.

Originally posted here:
Fla. House votes to ban so-called Internet cafes