Archive for the ‘Uncategorized’ Category

What Digital Non-Profits Can Learn From Companies Like Google

Daniel Atwood works with organizations in the social sector to craft meaningful experiences for customers and constituents, and to find innovative product, campaign and messaging ideas in unexpected places.

We live in a world where new digital products are solving problems daily -- from managing our finances to remembering the groceries. Often, they're solving problems we didn't know we had, like the need to connect several times a day in 140 characters or less. Occasionally, they're creating new problems (but that's a topic for another conversation).

[More from Mashable: Connected Cars: How to Accelerate Mainstream Adoption]

What we're just starting to see, and what is for many the most exciting trend in technology, is the emergence of digital products designed specifically to provide social services at scale. This isn't a rant about the death of the traditional non-profit, but a birth announcement. Non-profits (and other organizations aimed at making a social impact) are taking new approaches that look less like direct service and more like Google. These aren't just brochure websites. They're tools -- proprietary, unique and scalable. And this means there’s an increased need for talented digital product managers in the social sector.

Let’s take a quick look at where organizations have been focused for the past several years; we’ll call it Non-profit Digital Engagement 1.0.

[More from Mashable: Hands On With Google Chrome for Android]

In this phase, a handful of tools came to dominate our understanding of how non-profits could engage in the digital space. Specifically, these were tools that enabled people to email Congress, sign a petition, tell-a-friend, send a letter to the editor or make a donation. This toolset focused on two activities: fundraising and advocacy -- raising money and making noise. Those activities are important for most organizations, but they represent only a small slice of how non-profits actually aim to create change. And partly as a result, too many organizations were applying the same tools to engage people around wildly different problems.

So, what’s next? In short, less focus on tools that aim to engage more people with causes, and more focus on a new wave of customized digital tools that provide social services at scale to constituents.

Some examples:

Kiva: This is an early one, but one worth noting. Kiva created a digital platform to connect small-dollar funders with nascent social entrepreneurs. This let it scale its model in a way that would have been nearly impossible had it not put a significant focus on technology. Brighter Planet: Actually a for-profit company, Brighter Planet is a great example of using digital thinking to find new ways of adding value to social causes. It created the CM1 platform to calculate carbon impact and opened it up with APIs that allow others to plug in and do the same. MasterCard has signed on and will soon be providing carbon impact reports to its corporate clients based on its employees' travel habits. Brighter Planet has focused on a specific need, and it's offering a scalable solution for it. Google’s Haiti Person Finder: When an earthquake hit Haiti in January 2010, Google teamed up with the State Department to rapidly create a tool that let people submit and search for information about missing loved ones. It has since deployed it several times for other disasters, including the 2010 earthquake in Chile and the 2011 earthquake and resulting tsunami in Japan.

These examples go beyond the traditional paradigm of raising more money and sending more emails to Congress. They are each providing a real service in a constituent-centric, scalable way that would have been impossible just a few years ago.

A corollary to this promising growth in digital services is that it’s going to require more money invested in work that is traditionally viewed as ‘overhead’ in the non-profit world; namely, the significant staff time, design and development costs associated with creating and maintaining great digital products. Donors will have to think differently about investing in these types of projects. And organizations that hope to undertake them will have to lead the way by educating and inspiring donors in new ways.

For those groups that do want to create and scale digital services like these, the key to success will be putting the right people with the right power in the right positions. There is still a dire need for campaigners and organizers -- no question about it. But as often happens in this still-evolving field, we’re seeing a new core role emerge naturally: the digital product manager. Product managers -- people who can envision, build and market digital tools that add real value -- will play an increasingly critical role. Good product managers thrive on strategic thinking, but are also obsessed with ensuring that the final detail is just right. They care as much about design as about sustainable coding. They are tireless, tenacious and patient.

As many have already noted, we can't solve all of our problems with technology. But technology has opened up new opportunities for organizations to create scalable, innovative services in the social sector. And we're just beginning to realize the implications of that shift.

Image courtesy of iStockphoto, TommL

This story originally published on Mashable here.

Follow this link:
What Digital Non-Profits Can Learn From Companies Like Google

Lionsgate reaps big money from digital distribution of shows like 'Weeds'

LOS ANGELES, Feb 12 (TheWrap.com) - Lionsgate's most recent quarter was hardly cause for celebration -- revenue fell 23 percent at the company -- but its digital and video-on-demand revenue was certainly impressive.

Digital and on demand revenue jumped 80 percent to $62.4 million during its third fiscal quarter. Theatrical brought in only $8.4 million during the period.

Licensing deals for the studio's television programming, particularly the licensing of the first five seasons of "Weeds" to digital platforms, kept the money flowing over the three-month period. Vancouver-based Lionsgate has licensing deals with Netflix, Hulu and Amazon Prime.

"We've created a whole new revenue stream for serialized shows," Lionsgate co-chairman and chief executive officer Jon Feltheimer told analysts on Friday.

Overall revenue dropped to $323 million during a period in which the studio released no new films. There was a decrease of nearly $100 million from the same quarter last year. Lionsgate also announced losses of $1.7 million.

"The Hunger Games," its hotly anticipated adaptation of Suzanne Collins' best-selling novel, cannot come soon enough for the studio. Box-office prognosticators are predicting big things for the movie, but in the short term Lionsgate can comfort itself with having adroitly manipulated emerging home entertainment platforms.

In recent quarters, digital revenue and video-on-demand have actually been more consistent performers than theatrical releases. Revenue from Lionsgate's digital business increased 123 percent in the previous quarter to a record $65 million. Theatrical revenue was $22.3 million during the period, with "Abduction" and "Conan" both failing to hit it big.

In October, Lionsgate released "Margin Call" on video-on-demand at the same time the well-reviewed Wall Street drama debuted in theaters. The Roadside Attractions movie has grossed over $5 million at the domestic box office -- a figure the studio said it expected to match on demand.

It reportedly plans a similar release strategy with its recent Sundance acquisition "Arbitrage," a hedge-fund drama starring Richard Gere.

View original post here:
Lionsgate reaps big money from digital distribution of shows like 'Weeds'

Lionsgate reaps big money from digital distribution of shows

LOS ANGELES, Feb 12 (TheWrap.com) - Lionsgate's most recent quarter was hardly cause for celebration -- revenue fell 23 percent at the company -- but its digital and video-on-demand revenue was certainly impressive.

Digital and on demand revenue jumped 80 percent to $62.4 million during its third fiscal quarter. Theatrical brought in only $8.4 million during the period.

Licensing deals for the studio's television programming, particularly the licensing of the first five seasons of "Weeds" to digital platforms, kept the money flowing over the three-month period. Vancouver-based Lionsgate has licensing deals with Netflix, Hulu and Amazon Prime.

"We've created a whole new revenue stream for serialized shows," Lionsgate co-chairman and chief executive officer Jon Feltheimer told analysts on Friday.

Overall revenue dropped to $323 million during a period in which the studio released no new films. There was a decrease of nearly $100 million from the same quarter last year. Lionsgate also announced losses of $1.7 million.

"The Hunger Games," its hotly anticipated adaptation of Suzanne Collins' best-selling novel, cannot come soon enough for the studio. Box-office prognosticators are predicting big things for the movie, but in the short term Lionsgate can comfort itself with having adroitly manipulated emerging home entertainment platforms.

In recent quarters, digital revenue and video-on-demand have actually been more consistent performers than theatrical releases. Revenue from Lionsgate's digital business increased 123 percent in the previous quarter to a record $65 million. Theatrical revenue was $22.3 million during the period, with "Abduction" and "Conan" both failing to hit it big.

In October, Lionsgate released "Margin Call" on video-on-demand at the same time the well-reviewed Wall Street drama debuted in theaters. The Roadside Attractions movie has grossed over $5 million at the domestic box office -- a figure the studio said it expected to match on demand.

It reportedly plans a similar release strategy with its recent Sundance acquisition "Arbitrage," a hedge-fund drama starring Richard Gere.

Here is the original post:
Lionsgate reaps big money from digital distribution of shows

12 annoying fees Canadians should avoid

Fees may be a fact of life but that doesn’t mean you have to simply accept them. Fees can easily be overlooked when it’s just a few dollars, but even small fees can really bust your budget.

Here are a few fees that can be avoided:

    MORE RELATED TO THIS STORY
            — How stores trick you into overspending
            —What your Starbucks habit really costs you
            —4 risky places to swipe your debit card

1. Gym sign-up fees

Fitness centres are known for pushing this fee on new customers. Initiation fees can run up to $129 or more and are pure profit for the fitness centre. The fitness market is extremely competitive, so shop around for a gym that will waive the sign-up fee.

            —Your own worst investing mistakes
            —Are credit cards for kids a good idea?

2. Mortgage life insurance

If you own a home, chances are you were offered mortgage life insurance. This insurance is not required and must not be a prerequisite for qualifying for a mortgage.

Term life insurance is much cheaper and offers greater protection than mortgage life insurance offered by your bank. Mortgage insurance is the one financial product which declines in value as you continue to pay. [More: Why you shouldn’t buy mortgage insurance]

3. Give up your landline

About 2 million Canadian households no longer have a landline, opting for wireless service.

There are some risks — 911 emergency services have a harder time identifying your location, monitored alarms and other services require either a landline or added-cost wireless technology, and during bad weather, call volumes can increase exponentially causing disruptions to cell phone service.

But if the phone is mainly used to receive telemarketing calls at dinner time, consider dropping your landline service to reduce household expenses.

Skype, Google Voice, and Voice Over IP services can often drop phone service costs down to just a few dollars a month.

4. Cellphone roaming fees

Talk to your mobile carrier about a pre-paid long-distance/roaming package before travelling to the U.S. or elsewhere.

Paying a bit up front could save you hundreds of dollars, and they usually last for 30 days so if you don’t use them on a first trip you have them for the remainder of the month. But beware - data and text roaming may not be covered, and there are other pitfalls to avoid.

5. Cellphone cancellation fees

Cancelling a cell phone contract or a cable package before the end of the contract (or “service agreement”) can bring fees of several hundred dollars.

Bell and Rogers both charge up to $400 to cancel a cell phone contract early — plus additional fees if you have a data plan. Be aware of the fine print in your service agreement and choose your time to change contracts wisely, or don’t sign a contract in the first place.

6. Annual credit card fees

Platinum and gold reward cards can carry annual fees of $75 to $120 for features you don’t use, unless you are a high spender or business user.

They offer faster accumulation of reward points like Air Miles or Aeroplan, but if it takes you more than two years to earn enough to fly, you’ve already paid a hefty amount of your reward in fees.

There are no-fee credit cards that offer rewards. They include MBNA Smart Cash MasterCard (3 per cent cash back on groceries and gas, 1 per cent cash back on everything else), or the President’s Choice Financial MasterCard (points toward groceries).

Don’t carry around extra credit cards. You can be hit with fees for forgetting to make a monthly payment on a card you rarely use. [More: Choosing the best reward credit card]

7. Prepaid credit cards

Visa, MasterCard and American Express offer prepaid gift cards that can be used just like credit cards at merchants across the country. Unlike regular gift cards, prepaid credit cards come with a host of unnecessary fees.

There’s a $3.95 fee just for purchasing an RBC Visa gift card. After six months, a $1.50 fee will be charged monthly until the balance reaches zero.

Stick to buying regular store gift cards that come without the fees and expiry dates. [More: Are pre-paid credit cards good for students]

8. Banking fees and ATM fees

Banks and credit unions usually offer accounts that waive monthly fees if you maintain a minimum monthly balance. Online banks like ING Direct and PC Financial offer no-fee chequing accounts and don’t require a minimum balance.

Avoid non-bank cash machines in convenience stores, bars and plazas. You are charged $1.50 to $2.50 at the machine and often another levy by your own bank for a total of up to $4.50 a transaction.

Plan ahead, use a smart-phone app to locate your bank’s own closest machine or be aware of other locations.

CIBC customers, for example, can use President’s Choice machines and ATMs in most Mac’s Milk outlets without fees. Credit unions have their own extensive shared ATM network. [More: How to fight your bank and win]

9. Airline fees

Pack carefully — Air Canada and WestJet charge $20 for checking a 2nd bag, and bags that exceed the maximum weight or size can cost you an additional $50. And book your tickets online to avoid a telephone booking charge. [More: Correcting credit scores takes tons of work]

10. Coin-counting fees

Rolling loose change is a chore. Many people use coin-counting kiosks, found in grocery stores and malls, which quickly convert your loose change into paper currency. This convenience comes at a steep price, however, with companies like Coinstar charging a hefty 11.9 per cent processing fee.

Skip this fee and roll your change at home. You can buy coin wrappers at a discount store, or buy a small coin-counting machine for home use.

If you insist on hauling your loose change out of the house, most banks offer free coin counting to their customers. Bank of Montreal Coin Counters are free to use for both BMO and non-BMO customers.

11. Probate fees

These are charged by provincial governments to prove that a will and executor have been certified by a court, which can help avoid potential disagreements in dealing with an estate.

These fees (really taxes) vary by province and with the size of the estate — in Ontario, the fee on a $500,000 estate amounts to $7,000. But there are ways to reduce the amount of probate fees paid, with some planning. [More: How does probate work?]

12. Credit report

Under Ontario law, you are allowed to check your credit report to see what information financial institutions are sharing about your credit history.

It’s a good idea to make sure the information is correct before you apply for a loan or mortgage. But as Moneyville columnist Ellen Roseman has pointed out, the consumer reporting agencies want you to pay $15, despite the fact it’s your right to get it for free once every 12 months.

Read more from the original source:
12 annoying fees Canadians should avoid

Judging the choices for the Eastern Conference All-Star team reserves

Joe Johnson and Luol Deng (Getty Images)

Can we start off by reintroducing ourselves to the idea of how ridiculous this is? The NBA is hosting an All-Star game in the midst of a 66-game season, with the starters picked after just one month of play and the reserves selected after most teams had played about a third of their season. With every bit of that third being used to get into the sort of shape that the typical month-long training camp and exhibition season only helps to nearly take care of.

Then, the league mandates that coaches select a center, two forwards, two guards and two wild cards. Apparently the "wild cards" must be eligible NBA players, so it's not as if coaches could select a demolitions expert or wacky neighbor. This is silly in itself, because sometimes the centers or guards or even forwards aren't great. So, to force positional categorization in an exhibition game like this … OK, we'll stop.

We are the judging types, though. So click the jump for our take on who the coaches got it right with, and what they fell short on. Our take on the West can be found here.

Eastern Conference

Chris Bosh, Miami Heat

Bosh, really, should be starting this game. It does seem a bit odd the Heat would have three deserved All-Star starters (with Dwyane Wade, Bosh and LeBron James) and only the East's second-best record, but this is what happens when you run a top-heavy outfit. Free from some of the criticism that dogged him last season, Bosh has actually dipped a bit in the rebounding department (per-game and percentage-wise), but his 19-point and eight-rebound averages (with 51 percent shooting) make him the best big forward in the East right now.

Luol Deng, Chicago Bulls

This is a tough one, and I'm pretty sure you know where I'm heading with this.

Luol Deng might be my favorite person in the NBA. That's not throwaway praise, as I dismiss his credibility as an NBA All-Star. Also, in terms of pure aesthetics? I might not have a player I enjoy watching more. He does everything. Absolutely everything. Defends like mad, holds his team together regardless of the four on the court with him, plays through injury, plays through pain, plays and plays and plays.

Topping all those intangibles is the fact that even though it often ranks as an intangible, defense is half the game and Luol is an all-league defender in ways that don't show up in typical box scores. His Chicago Bulls have held up in his absence, and that easy-ish schedule has helped, but he means the world to them. There's a reason for all this fawning.

I don't think he's been amongst the 12 best players in the Eastern Conference this season, even though defense counts for a full 50 percent of how we should be judging things. I don't think he's far off, but I don't think he's been better than Tyson Chandler, perhaps Rajon Rondo, or even at times Luol's polar opposite in Orlando's Ryan Anderson. Toss in the fact that he's missed a quarter of Chicago's games, and this makes his inclusion a dodgy one in my eyes.

Nasty bits, over.

Luol Deng is an All-Star. He contributes in enough ways to make his inclusion a deserved one. At Deng's best (and when he's not tired and has legs to shoot with), his offensive gifts make him a borderline All-Star and his defensive acumen puts him over the top. The idea of rewarding players for being part of a great team (each of Chicago's players, every damn one of them, have a Player Efficiency Rating in double figures) with a great record with All-Star berths is a silly one. You shouldn't be handed a certain amount of All-Star berths for every 100 percentage points you are over .600, but I'm fully on board with the idea that Luol Deng, at his absolute best, does enough on either side of the ball to have earned this selection.

Roy Hibbert, Indiana Pacers

Hibbert, even to pivot play freaks like us, is not the most thrilling watch in the NBA. He does a lot of stuff correctly, he comes and goes as a game-changing passer and he holds his own on either end while limiting the foul trouble that severely plagued his first few years in the NBA. I wouldn't have taken him over Tyson Chandler, who has just about completely reformed the New York Knicks defensively. Per-minute? Hibbert has played quite well in the middle this year, but he still only churns out 30 minutes a contest. And he needs the rest at times, if you know what I mean.

Don't sleep on the guy as an All-Star game factor, though. Yes, these exhibitions are lob-fests, out of tune with Hibbert's at-times plodding play, but we're just eight years removed from another only-picked-because-we-had-to-pick-a-center choice in Jamaal Magliore dropping 19 points and eight rebounds in the 2004 All-Star Game mainly by just hanging around the paint while everyone else tried to connect on 3-pointers and alley-oop dunks.

Andre Iguodala, Philadelphia 76ers

Frankly, 'Dre hasn't deserved an All-Star berth thus far in his career. He's been close more than a few times, essentially a coin flip guy that fell short in most seasons save for 2010-11, but I'm more than OK with leaving him off the roster until now.

Until about Jan. 9 or so, actually. Because Iguodala has been absolutely brilliant on both sides of the ball this season for a surprise Philadelphia team that is on pace to set all sorts of records defensively. If the coaches selected Iguodala because he's the most famous player on what has turned into a great team, that's a shame, because he's more than earned this selection regardless of Philly's sterling record.

And he's going to be great -- GREAT -- in this game.

Joe Johnson, Atlanta Hawks

Johnson, to me, is a dodgy pick only in relation to selecting him over teammate Josh Smith. Smith might turn coaches off with his shot selection at times, but it's a pity that (deserved) reputation covers up the other 90 percent of the game that he plays at an All-Star level on both sides. Choosing Joe (and, to a greater extent, Luol Deng) over Smith is an oversight.

Joe, as usual, is right there. He's scoring 18 points per game on a pretty good team, and that's often enough. It isn't the worst oversight, but the combination of factors that happens to include a more-deserving teammate makes this a tough one. And Rajon Rondo, Brandon Jennings, Ryan Anderson and even Greg Monroe should raise a hackle or two as well.

Paul Pierce, Boston Celtics

Rajon Rondo has missed eight of his team's games, and Paul Pierce has cobbled together a terrific all-around season in spite of a tough start and heel issue that you know hasn't gone away. I understand that teammates should be judged against each other with these seven spots to fill, but it does make for a tidy column point.

We've spent quite a bit of time discussing Pierce's career and impressive season this week, but it bears repeating this guy continues to find new ways of adding to his overall game. Pierce probably doesn't have many 40-point games left in him, but he's also going to slide over defensively, find someone with the perfect pass and start the break with the needed leak-out lob.

He might have an All-Star game MVP left in him.

Deron Williams, New Jersey Nets

Struggling with a terrible Nets team, Wil
liams has actually played down to their level at times this season. But he's also dribbled around the perimeter, into the paint and back out looking for anyone that remotely resembles not just an NBA starter, but a rotation-worthy teammate. And, by and large save for fleeting moments from Kris Humphries, reserve Jordan Farmar and MarShon Brooks (on offense, at least) they just aren't there.

Williams has forged ahead, though. He's a sound pick over Rajon Rondo even if Rondo had played in more games, and he's on par with Brandon Jennings once you factor in Jennings' marvelous defense. Williams, as a former All-Star, clearly won this coin flip over the much-improved Bucks guard. We'll just have to see who pulls out ahead the next time Milwaukee and New Jersey play.

Or, you'll have to see who wins that one. Because there's no way we're sitting through a Milwaukee-New Jersey game.

More sports news from the Yahoo! Sports Minute:

Read more:
Judging the choices for the Eastern Conference All-Star team reserves