Mediaboss Marketing

In a recent blog post, Vitalik Buterin expressed his opinions on three key issues regarding the decentralization of Ethereum: MEV, liquid staking, and node hardware requirements.

Buterin explained that many of the concerns related to the centralization of Ethereum can be addressed through smart protocol designs and updates, some of which are already being implemented.

Lets see below all the details.

As anticipated, Vitalik Buterin, co-founder of Ethereum, responded to the criticisms directed at the blockchain in a detailed blog post, analyzing three fundamental issues for the centralization of Ethereum.

MEV (Miner Extractable Value), liquid staking and hardware costs for managing a single node are the three key points.

Buterin has observed that concerns about the design of Ethereum in these three key areas are widely shared and added:

These are concerns I have personally had on many occasions.

However, according to Buterin, these problems might not be as difficult to overcome as some argue.

In his post, published on May 17th, Buterin first addresses the issue of MEV, which is the financial gain that sophisticated node operators can obtain by reordering transactions within a block.

Buterin distinguishes two approaches to MEV: minimization (reducing MEV through the design of intelligent protocols, like CowSwap) and quarantine (attempting to reduce or eliminate MEV altogether through in-protocol techniques).

Although the MEV quarantine may seem like an appealing option, Buterin notes that this perspective carries some risks of centralization:

If builders have the power to completely exclude transactions from a block, attacks can easily arise-

However, Buterin has supported builders working on MEV quarantine through concepts like transaction inclusion lists, which take away the builders ability to completely exclude transactions from a block.

I think that the ideas in this direction really pushing the quarantine box to be as small as possible are really interesting, and I am in favor of going in that direction.

Vitalik Buterin has addressed the issue of the low number of solo stakers on Ethereum.

In particular explaining that many prefer to use centralized staking providers like Coinbase or decentralized solutions like Lido and RocketPool.

This choice is due to the complexity, hardware requirements, and the minimum of 32 ETH needed to run an Ethereum node independently.

While acknowledging the progress made in reducing the costs and complexity of managing a single node, Buterin emphasized that there is still more that we could do.

Suggesting the possibility of reducing the time required to withdraw ETH in staking or lowering the minimum requirement of 32 ETH to become a solo staker, as stated:

Incorrect answers could lead Ethereum down a path of centralization and recreation of the traditional financial system with additional steps; correct answers could create a shining example of a successful ecosystem with a wide and diversified set of individual stakers and highly decentralized staking pools.

Regarding the high hardware requirements for nodes, Buterin admitted that the issue is more complex.

However, he acknowledged that with the implementation of Verkle Trees and the upcoming EIP-4444, the hardware requirements of a node could plausibly eventually decrease to less than one hundred gigabytes, and perhaps almost to zero if we completely eliminate the responsibility of storing the history (perhaps only for non-staking nodes).

Buterin concluded his post urging the Ethereum ecosystem to confront difficult questions rather than avoid them:

We should have a deep respect for the properties that make Ethereum unique and continue to work to maintain and improve those properties as Ethereum grows.

In a post on X, Buterin added that he is happy to see a civil debate among community members:

I am really proud of the fact that Ethereum does not have a culture that tries to prevent people from expressing their opinions, even when they have very negative feelings towards important things in the protocol or ecosystem. Some wave the ideal of open discourse as a flag, others take it seriously.

Go here to read the rest:

Vitalik Buterin is concerned about the decentralization of Ethereum - The Cryptonomist

Ethereum, the worlds second-largest blockchain by market capitalization, faces a complex challenge known as MEV (Miner Extractable Value). This issue has emerged as a significant concern for both users and developers on the Ethereum network. But what exactly is MEV, and why is it causing such a stir?

Dissecting MEV: Understanding the Block Builders Advantage

MEV stands for Miner Extractable Value. In simpler terms, it refers to the additional profit that miners or, in the upcoming Proof-of-Stake system, validators, can extract beyond the standard block rewards offered by the network. This profit stems from their ability to reorder transactions within a block.

Heres how it works: When a block is produced, miners (or validators) have some flexibility in choosing which transactions to include. This seemingly minor detail creates an opportunity. Certain transactions, like arbitrage opportunities or liquidations, can be strategically positioned within a block to yield the validator additional profits. For instance, a validator could reorder transactions to get the best price on a token swap or prioritize transactions that benefit their own holdings.

While MEV can be a source of profit for validators, it has several negative consequences for the Ethereum network:

Recognizing the detrimental effects of MEV, Ethereum co-founder Vitalik Buterin has proposed a set of solutions to mitigate the issue. Here are some of the key ideas:

Also, read How The Intriguing Spot Ethereum ETF Could Reshape The Crypto Market In 2024 And Beyond?

The proposed solutions from Vitalik Buterin are just the beginning of a conversation. Implementing these ideas will require extensive discussion and collaboration within the Ethereum community. Developers, researchers, and users will need to weigh the trade-offs of each solution and determine the best path forward.

Here are some key aspects to watch in the coming months:

The quest to tackle MEV is a crucial step in ensuring the long-term health and fairness of the Ethereum network. By addressing these challenges, Ethereum can pave the way for a more decentralized, efficient, and user-friendly blockchain platform.

Read more from the original source:

The MEV Maze: Vitalik Buterin Proposes Solutions For Ethereum's Block Building Woes - Blockchain Magazine

In his blog post titled "The Near and Mid-Term Future of Improving the Ethereum Network's Permissionlessness and Decentralization," Vitalik Buterin outlines significant advancements for Ethereum's network. The primary focus is on developing strategies and implementing key protocol enhancements to enhance the experience for node operators and users on both Layer 1 and Layer 2.

The Ethereum community and developers are continually questioning whether the network's development is aligned with the right goals. Concerns about the network's decentralization, along with the technical capacity to ship large and significant features, are being addressed, with many of these improvements already in progress. The focus now is to address the concerns raised by the community and provide viable solutions.

Miner Extractable Value (MEV), a revenue form that only can be gained by executing complex strategies within various DeFi protocols, has caused concern within the Ethereum community. This form of revenue has led to large actors gaining a higher return per block due to their ability to optimize extraction algorithms. Ethereum researchers are working to minimize this issue by limiting the power of builders while still allowing them to optimize arbitrage and other forms of MEV collecting. The goal is to reduce the builder's power to exclude or delay transactions, thereby preventing certain types of attacks.

Most Ethereum staking is currently done by various providers, including centralized operators and DAOs like Lido and RocketPool. However, solo stakers still make up a relatively small percentage of all Ethereum staking. The Ethereum community is researching ways to increase solo staking by reducing the minimum deposit size and simplifying the setup process. The goal is to make solo staking more accessible and economically viable for a wider range of participants.

The accessibility of running a node has been a contentious issue within the blockchain community for a decade. While running a node is currently challenging and requires significant resources, Ethereum is working on solutions to reduce the hardware requirements. Implementations of Verkle trees and EIP-4444 could potentially decrease node hardware requirements to less than a hundred gigabytes. Future developments could possibly reduce these requirements even further.

Ethereum is taking steps to move away from reliance on a small number of large-scale actors for network operations. Current protocol proposals are emphasizing the need for a truly decentralized network, with developments such as stateless nodes, MEV mitigations, and single-slot finality already underway. However, there is still much work to be done to further enhance Ethereum's decentralization and permissionlessness.

. . .

Here is the original post:

Vitalik Buterin on Ethereum's Future: Improving Decentralization and Permissionlessness - Blockchain.News

Benzinga - by Aniket Verma, .

Ethereum (CRYPTO: ETH) co-founder and one of the biggest names in the cryptocurrency space, Vitalik Buterin, sounded a cautionary note on the ills of "Superintelligent AI" and urged people to push back against those rooting for it.

What Happened: The man behind the world's most-invested blockchain network called superintelligent AI systems "risky" in an X post.

He went one step further and remarked, "No $7T server farms plz," an obvious dig at OpenAI chief Sam Altman's ambitious $7 trillion investment plan to achieve the companys artificial general intelligence goals.

A strong advocate of decentralization in technologies, Buterin's criticism was also directed at the concentration of power in the AI industry. He batted for an ecosystem of open models running on consumer hardware rather than a few central servers controlled by a small cohort of conglomerates.

Such models are also much lower in terms of doom risk than both corporate megalomania and militaries," Buterin asserted.

Why It Matters: Buterin's remarks come amid Altman's aggressive push to secure a massive $7 trillion in funding in his quest to build artificial general intelligencea disruptive AI technology broadly more capable than humans at a range of tasks.

However, the capacity needed to build a model of such scale has been deemed out of reach in the current scenario.

That said, Altman has expressed a firm commitment to building the technology, regardless of the financial implications.

Buterin's latest views come following his comment last week where he mentioned OpenAI's GPT-4 passing the Turing test a benchmark for evaluating an AI system's humanness.

Read Next: Vitalik Buterin Says Proud Ethereum Doesnt Censor Critical Views, Social Media Users Complain The Reality Is Opposite

Photo by Alexey Smyshlyaev on Shutterstock.

2024 Benzinga.com. Benzinga does not provide investment advice. All rights reserved.

Read the original article on Benzinga

Continued here:

'No $7T Server Farms Plz:' Ethereum Creator Vitalik Buterin Thinks OpenAI Chief Sam Altman's Vision For Rushing Into ... - Investing.com UK

Vitalik Buterin, the co-founder of Ethereum, has released a new blog post discussing a new cryptographic proving system that can make zero-knowledge proofs more efficient.

The proving system, called Binius, is designed to operate directly over binary code on computers. Binary code is a language understood by computers, and it is used to store information and represents data using the symbols zero and one, otherwise known as bits.

Although there are some similarities between STARKs and Binius, Buterin explains that the mathematical tricks that enable these different proving systems are very different.

Generally speaking, STARKs is a technology that has enabled complicated statements to be easily cryptographically verified. It is designed in a way that can easily compute numbers when they are of small value, when there are large values, STARKs generate extra values, which can lead to inefficiency.

Unlike STARKs that arithmetize a statement into a polynomial equation a mathematical expression which model a relationship between variables in a block Binius treats data as a hypercube and grid, and uses multilinear polynomials to perform cryptographic proofs.

Binius converts individual values into bits and places them in a hypercube and a square. This hypercube is then converted into a grid and computations are performed in order to receive an output matrix.

A verifier will then perform its own computational calculations to ensure that the information itself matches and ensure that the compute columns returns a value claimed by the prover.

I highly encourage people to understand and explore! Lots of innovations have been happening in ZK-proving recently. And I expect lots more to come soon, Buterin wrote in an X post.

Start your day with top crypto insights from David Canellis and Katherine Ross. Subscribe to the Empire newsletter.

See the original post:

Vitalik Buterin talks ways to make zk proofs more efficient - Blockworks