Archive for the ‘Vitalik Buterin’ Category

Polygon: among the most searched PoS crypto – The Cryptonomist

Polygon is the second most searched Proof-of-Stake (PoS) crypto in the US, after Ethereum. This was revealed by the study conducted by TheMoneyMongers, which analyzed Google Trends data over the past 90 days.

The study conducted by TheMoneyMongers revealed that Polygon (MATIC) has captured the interest of Americans, becoming the second most searched Proof-of-Stake crypto on Google.

In essence, analyzing Google Trends over the past 90 days across the top 5 PoS crypto, Polygon is second only to Ethereum, which recently switched to this consensus mechanism.

Specifically, 18 states in the US, or 35.3%, are interested in Polygon, which has quickly become Ethereums competitor due to its superior ability to scale on the blockchain.

By contrast, in the case of Ethereum, the study states that it is 54.9%, meaning as many as 28 states in the US that are interested in researching it on the search engine giant.

Next followed other crypto assets, also chosen based on their market capitalization and specifically because they are Proof-of-Stake: Cardano, Solana and Polkadot.

Respectively, the study states that Cardano is researched by 7.8% and that is 4 states in the US, Solana by only one state, and Polkadot in scattered way.

Cardano is reported to have captured the interest of residents of Delaware, the District of Columbia, Rhode Island, and South Dakota. Solana is highly sought after by residents of Maine, and for Polkadot it appears that some residents of Tennessee, Connecticut, Massachusetts, and Wisconsin are somewhat interested.

Apparently, Polygon has not yet managed to overtake Ethereum, not only in terms of market capitalization and price performance, but also Google searches in the US.

The thing is that while Polygon started out as a Proof-of-Stake crypto, Ethereum has become one ever since its last fork called The Merge, completed with the latest network update called Shanghai/Capella (or also called Shapella).

And indeed, Ethereum is saying goodbye to mining in an official way, implementing Ethereum Improvement Proposal (EIP) 4895 and allowing validators and users to withdraw their staked ETH on the network.

The enabling of withdrawals, which took place a few days ago, completed Ethereums transition from the Proof-of-Work consensus mechanism to the more sustainable so-called Proof-of-Stake mechanism.

In this regard, Sudhir Khatwani, co-founder of TheMoneyMongers.com, commented on the results:

With Ethereums Shanghai Upgrade, Ethereum has become the most popular Proof Of Stake cryptocurrency because users who had earlier staked 32 ETH, can unstake and withdraw their Ether, as staking and unstacking is a critical part of Proof of Stake consensus mechanism.

Despite these movements of Ethereum, TheMoneyMongers study states that Polygon remains the most attractive PoS crypto in the following states: Alabama, Indiana, Kansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, Minnesota, Nebraska, New Mexico, North Carolina, Ohio, Oklahoma, Tennessee, Texas, Utah, Virginia, West Virginia, Wisconsin, and Wyoming.

Recently, Polygon launched its new mainnet, the zkEVM. The event saw Ethereum co-founder Vitalik Buterin being a special guest and in particular the one who first made the first transaction on the new network, hiding a message of his own.

Basically, Buterin agreed to perform the first ever symbolic transaction on the Polygon zkEVM with a message converted to hexadecimal code that said:

Millions of constraints for man, unconstrained scalability for mankind

The zkEVM network was created by Polygon together with Immutable, and is a new platform dedicated to developers in the crypto world.

Specifically, the zkEVM is intended to be an advancement in blockchain-based gaming that integrates the use of ZK technology that will serve to accelerate the development of Web3 games.

Related postsMore from author

Original post:

Polygon: among the most searched PoS crypto - The Cryptonomist

Moving beyond the blockchain trilemma: L1 vs. L2 – Cointelegraph

As of February 2023, over 44.15 million unique addresses have a non-zero balance of Bitcoin (BTC). While this may seem impressive, lets face it blockchain technology has come a long way since Bitcoins inception in 2009.

Bitcoin addresses with a non-zero balance. Source: Glassnode

However, as the technology continues to evolve and gain mainstream adoption, scalability remains one of the biggest challenges facing the industry. Bitcoin and Ethereum, two of the largest blockchain networks, are highly decentralized, with thousands of nodes operating on each network (17,553 nodes for Bitcoin and 7,099 nodes for Ethereum as of April 14, 2023).

Ethereum mainnet statistics. Source: Ethernodes

While this decentralization provides greater security, it also results in slower transaction speeds and scalability issues due to the significant computational resources required to maintain the continuously growing sum of nodes.

Hence, the blockchain trilemma, coined by Vitalik Buterin, suggests that blockchains can only have two out of three properties: scalability, security and decentralization. As a result, this fundamental trade-off represents a significant barrier to the widespread adoption of blockchain technology.

There are two primary strategies that have been introduced to tackle the scalability challenge: layer-1 (L1) and layer-2 (L2) solutions. While L1 solutions seek to optimize the base layer of a blockchain, L2 solutions provide an additional layer on top of the base layer to facilitate faster and more affordable transactions. Needless to say, this has sparked an ongoing battle between the two approaches as each demonstrates unique strengths and weaknesses.

Layer-1 blockchains, such as Bitcoin and Ethereum, are designed to optimize the foundational layer of a blockchain protocol to increase transaction throughput and reduce fees. Their maximum capacity is often limited by network congestion and other factors, so L1 scaling solutions directly extend the blockchain protocol to improve scalability.

A prominent example of this is the introduction of Ethereum 2.0 and the subsequent development of (dank) sharding. Sharding aims to increase Ethereums transaction processing speed and reduce fees by splitting the network into smaller, more manageable shards. Each shard can then process transactions in parallel, significantly increasing the networks overall speed.

Layer-2 blockchains, on the other hand, refer to a network or technology that operates on top of an underlying blockchain protocol with the aim to improve scalability too. The idea behind L2s is to shift transactions from the base layer blockchain to an adjacent system architecture that is able to process the majority of the data and then report back to the base blockchain to finalize the result.

For instance, Ethereum is a layer-1 network, and a number of layer-2 solutions have been built to improve transaction speeds on the Ethereum network, including Polygon (MATIC), Optimism (OP) and Arbitrum (ARB).

Undoubtedly, the scalability battle has come to the forefront with recent developments in L1 and L2 blockchains. While this may be the case, understanding the differences between L1 and L2 blockchain networks is crucial to gain insight and distinguish the primary differences between both layers.

Layer-1 blockchains and layer-2 scaling solutions differ not only in their purpose but also in their fundamental design and architecture. L1 blockchains are designed to be self-sufficient, meaning that all the necessary layers for data availability, consensus, and execution are integrated into a single system. This design is intended to provide the security, decentralization, and immutability, that are the hallmarks of blockchain technology.

In contrast, layer-2 scaling solutions are designed to enhance the performance of L1 blockchains rather than operate as independent blockchains. Layer-2 scaling solutions use off-chain techniques such as state channels, nested blockchains, rollups and sidechains to process transactions faster and more efficiently. In this way, layer-2 scaling solutions can increase the transaction throughput of L1 blockchains without compromising their security and decentralization.

Another significant difference between L1 and L2 scaling solutions lies in their scalability methods. L1 blockchains depend on various techniques such as consensus mechanism changes, chain forking and sharding to boost their transaction throughput. While these methods can improve transaction speeds, they can also lead to network congestion, security risks and fragmentation. L2 scaling solutions, on the other hand, process transactions off-chain, allowing for increased speed and efficiency while still relying on the primary network for security and decentralization. This approach reduces the risk of network congestion, minimizes fragmentation and enhances the overall performance of the blockchain ecosystem.

The Nakamoto coefficient is an important metric to consider when evaluating the level of decentralization in a blockchain network. It is crucial to consider the trade-off between scalability and decentralization when measuring up the difference between L1 and L2 solutions.

Often, L1 solutions such as Near protocol (NEAR) or Solana (SOL) have a higher coefficient because they offer a high degree of decentralization due to their reliance on a large number of validators. On the other hand, L2 solutions such as Opside or zkSync could offer improved scalability through the use of off-chain processing, but in turn, would be less decentralized due to their reliance on a smaller set of validators.

The ongoing battle between L1 and L2 solutions has its fair share of pros and cons. While L1 blockchains offer superior security and decentralization, they suffer from scalability issues. In contrast, L2 solutions offer scalability and lower fees, but may come at the cost of compromising the security and decentralization of the underlying blockchain.

Evidently, L2 solutions are not a one-size-fits-all solution to the scalability challenge. They rely on the base layers security and decentralization, and if the base is compromised, it could affect the very foundation of the layer-2 solutions in question.

Needless to say, as blockchain technology continues to mature, the outcome of this showdown will likely determine the path forward for scaling the technology to meet the demands of real-world applications. In the meantime, it is vital for both L1 and L2 solutions to work together to effectively address the scalability challenge.

Digi516 has been a crypto researcher and NFT enthusiast for almost a decade, with experience in educating and managing several crypto communities. Now, as head of community lead at XGo, Digi516 is on a mission to onboard the next 100 million users to Web3 and empower sovereign financial freedom.

Disclaimer. Cointelegraph does not endorse any content or product on this page. While we aim at providing you with all important information that we could obtain, readers should do their own research before taking any actions related to the company and carry full responsibility for their decisions, nor can this article be considered as investment advice.

Read the original:

Moving beyond the blockchain trilemma: L1 vs. L2 - Cointelegraph

Blockchain: Cartesi ready for mainnet – The Cryptonomist

Cartesi is a project that is developing a Virtual Machine on blockchain based on Linux and Ethereum, through which rollups and dApps can be created.

A few days ago it announced that the launch of the mainnet is approaching.

Cartesi Rollups is approaching a stage of development ready for the launch of the mainnet.

In reality, from a strictly technical point of view, it would not be accurate to refer to it as a mainnet in this case, since it is a specific execution environment that can be deployed as layer 2 or layer 3, but is not a layer 1 blockchain or dApp.

However, dApps created using Cartesi will actually go on the mainnet.

Thus, Cartesi Rollups will be mainnet-ready with the launch on mainnet of the first Cartesi-based dApp, which will be Honeypot.

Honeypot is a dApp that will be launched on the Ethereum mainnet for the purpose of launching and running a hacking challenge.

Indeed, it will contain real assets with the dual goals of creating a financial benchmark for secure asset management, and providing a gamified battleground for the community.

Unlike classic bug finder bounties, and capture-the-flag events, to win this challenge you will not need to submit a hacking recipe, and there will be no hidden elements to discover. Simply piercing the honeypot (honey jar) will allow you to take home the entire loot, no strings attached.

Cartesi is a rollup execution layer specifically for applications with a Linux runtime.

Cartesi rollups can be implemented as layer 2, for example on Ethereum, or as layer 3, for example on Optimism, Arbitrum, zkEVM chains, or even as sovereign rollups. It serves to open up the design space to more expressive and computationally intensive blockchain applications.

Since dApps in this way are deployed on their own customizable rollup chains specific to the applications themselves, they do not compete with each other within the ecosystem for resources. This provides Ethereum and its Layer 2s with several orders of magnitude more computational capacity.

Cartesi also has its own token, called CTSI, present on the Ethereum blockchain as well as on the Arbitrum blockchain and BSC chain.

Since the announcement of the approaching launch of the mainnet, its market value has jumped from $0.15 to $0.29, nearly doubling within two days. It subsequently fell to the current $0.24.

Although this is still 86% lower than the high of May 2021, when it even surpassed $1.7, it is nevertheless significantly higher than the $0.05 it had before the start of the last big bull run.

It is worth noting that the initial launch price in April 2020 was below $0.04, or six times less than the current level.

After also falling below $0.10 during 2022, it has posted an excellent +136% so far in 2023, with the market capitalization back above $240 million.

This is a low level of capitalization, though not very low, which puts this token in the fourth or fifth tier. It is enough to consider that, for example, Arbitrums ARB capitalizes over $2 billion, almost ten times as much.

In early 2023 Cartesi launched its Community Grants Program (CGP), with the goal of expanding the network of its contributors who are building its ecosystem.

One million dollars has been made available for the CGP in 2023 alone, and to encourage idea sharing, foster greater collaboration, increase transparency, and attract new contributors the Cartesi Foundation encourages all grantees to engage with others on its public Discord channels.

The first to argue that rollups could be an important part of the development of the Ethereum ecosystem is co-founder Vitalik Buterin himself.

Indeed, layer 2s are not enough, precisely because they consume a lot of resources and can be bottlenecks.

Rollups, like Cartesis, can use their own resources, without burdening those of layers 1 or 2 on which they rely.

Moreover, hundreds, if not thousands, of them can coexist, increasing the computational potential of the ecosystem by several orders of magnitude.

However, they must be based on secure layer 1 or layer 2, otherwise one of the major advantages of decentralized blockchains is lost.

Cartesi however is not the only project working on rollups on Ethereum. In fact, there are already even more advanced ones. The beauty is precisely the extreme openness and freedom of decentralized ecosystems, thanks to which there can be a lot of positive competition that directs developers to try to do better than others, thus ending up creating benefits for everyone.

Related postsMore from author

Visit link:

Blockchain: Cartesi ready for mainnet - The Cryptonomist

Ethereum Creator Vitalik Buterin Abruptly Sends 500 ETH to Little-Known DeFi Protocol – The Daily Hodl

Ethereum (ETH) founder Vitalik Buterin is catching the attention of crypto sleuths after moving 500 ETH to an under-the-radar decentralized finance (DeFi) project.

Blockchain security firm PeckShield first spotted the transaction and revealed that a wallet controlled by Buterin transferred the ETH stack to DeFi protocol Reflexer.

Reflexer is a platform designed to enable users to mint stablecoins by using their crypto as collateral.

The protocol issues RAI, a crypto asset backed by Ethereum that aims to maintain a stable value in order to protect holders from the volatility of the markets.

According to PeckShield, Buterin used the 500 ETH to accumulate stablecoins.

The blockchain security firm shows that the Ethereum founder used the ETH trove as collateral on Reflexer to mint 150,000 RAI tokens. Buterin subsquently exchanged 132,500 RAI for 378,500 USD Coin (USDC). The remaining 17,500 RAI was swapped for 50,000 Dai (DAI).

PeckShield says that the conversion of ETH to stablecoins USDC and DAI all took place within three hours.

Blockchain-tracking service Etherscan also witnessed the transactions. According to Etherscan, Buterin initially transferred 200 ETH to Reflexer to mint 100,0000 RAI. Immediately after, Buterin sent 300 ETH to Reflexer to mint 50,000 RAI.

Etherscan reveals that Buterin paid more than $200 to process both transactions.

At time of writing, Ethereum is trading for $1,596, up over 10% in the last 24 hours.

Featured Image: Shutterstock/The Creative Factory

Read this article:

Ethereum Creator Vitalik Buterin Abruptly Sends 500 ETH to Little-Known DeFi Protocol - The Daily Hodl

Ripple (XRP) Price Prediction 2025-2030: Assessing if XRP will fly after the lawsuit – AMBCrypto News

Disclaimer: The datasets shared in the following article have been compiled from a set of online resources and do not reflect AMBCryptos own research on the subject.

XRP is a cryptocurrency that was developed by Ripple Labs, a company that provides financial settlement and payment services to banks and other financial institutions. XRP is used by Ripple Labs as a means of facilitating cross-border payments and has gained significant adoption in the financial industry.

One reason for XRPs relatively strong performance may be its strong adoption in the financial industry. Many banks and financial institutions have begun using XRP as a means of facilitating cross-border payments, which has helped to increase demand for the cryptocurrency. Additionally, Ripple Labs has made significant efforts to promote the adoption of XRP, which has helped to increase its credibility and appeal.

In the early years of XRP, its price was relatively stable, with some periods of growth and others of stagnation. However, in the past year or so, the price of XRP has seen some significant fluctuations. In late 2020, XRPs price experienced a significant bull run, reaching an all-time high of over $3 in December of that year.

Read Price Prediction for XRP for 2023-24

According to data from CoinMarketCap, at press time, XRP was worth $0.36. The tokens market capitalization of $17.6 billion made it the sixth-largest cryptocurrency in the world.

The XRP ledger uses distributed ledger technology, which is different from the more commonly used blockchain technology. This technology allows bank and non-bank actors to incorporate the Ripple protocol into their own systems, as the protocol is completely open and accessible to anyone without prior approval from Ripple Labs.

In 2017 and early 2018, XRP reached an all-time high of $3.40, marking a 51,709% increase from its original price at the beginning of that year. Although it has since declined, XRP remains a significant player in the cryptocurrency market and is consistently ranked among the top ten coins in terms of market capitalization. The team behind XRP and Ripple continue to work on the development of the XRP ledger and its potential use cases in the global financial system. Overall, XRP remains a significant and influential cryptocurrency in the world of finance and technology.

In 2020, the US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) sued Ripple, alleging that the company sold $1.3 billion in unregistered securities through its XRP cryptocurrency. Ripple denies the allegations, claiming that XRP is not a security and does not meet the criteria for the Howey Test.

A report by CoinShares indicated that investors are confident of Ripples victory in the landmark case against the SEC. This is based on the fact that XRP investment products have seen consistent inflows for three consecutive weeks.

On the business front, Ripple revealed key developments pertaining to its European expansion. The company shared its progress with Paris- based Lemonway and Xbaht in Sweden. Businesses in France and Sweden will now be able to leverage Ripples On-Demand Liquidity (ODL).

On 15 November, Ripple announced that it partnered with MFS Africa, a leading fintech firm with the largest mobile money footprint in the continent. This joint venture seeks to streamline mobile payments for users in 35 countries.

In other news, Ripple CTO David Schwartz took to Twitter to offer former employees of the troubled crypto exchange FTX, a place at Ripple. However, this offer only stands for employees who were not involved with compliance, finance, or business ethics.

Ripples tie-up with Tokyo Mitsubishi Bank in 2017 was a major milestone. Following the same, it became the second-largest crypto by market capitalization for a brief period. A year later, Ripple was in the news again for its partnership with international banking conglomerate Santander Group for an app focusing on cross-border transactions.

In terms of rivals, Ripple has close to none at the moment. They are the leading crypto firm catering to financial institutions around the world. As the number of partnerships grows, XRP will reap the benefits. After all, it is the medium of exchange for all cross-border transactions enabled by RippleNet.

Ripple has been capitalizing on the need for quick transactions and another untapped potential in emerging economies, given that nations in Latin America and Asia-Pacific regions are more likely to realize the value of blockchain and its tokens compared to their first-world counterparts. With the rise of central bank digital currencies (CBDC), it is likely that developing countries looking to explore this option will go for Ripple since it already offers a well-established cross-border framework. Increased adoption of CBDCs will also lead to banking institutions considering integrating crypto into their services. This will work out very well for Ripple since RippleNet is already associated with a number of banks.

Blockchain solutions being offered to Ripples Central Bank partners wanting to venture into CBDCs include the option to leverage the XRP ledger using a private sidechain.

Ripple is predicted to develop rapidly over the forecast period, as it can be used for a variety of functions like accounting, investment, smart contract implementation, and decentralized programming.

XRP has an edge over its rivals due to its low cost of entry. The fact that a few dollars will buy tens of XRP seems appealing to new investors, especially those who prefer little investment.

According to a Valuates report, the cryptocurrency markets size is expected to hit $4.94 billion by 2030, growing at a CAGR of 12.8%. A number of crypto-firms will benefit from this, Ripple among them.

The growth in the cryptocurrency market is spurred by an increase in the demand for operational efficiency and transparency in financial payment systems, as well as an increase in demand for remittances in developing nations.

The general idea is that RippleNets adoption by financial institutions will increase, leading to more recognition of the platform as well as its native token. This has also been factored in while calculating predictions for 2025 and beyond.

At press time, XRP was trading at $0.3696, according to TradingView.

XRPs press time price was a far cry from its all-time high of $3.84 in January 2018. As a matter of fact, its price was closer to its launch price than its all-time high.

Although XRP gained somewhat over the last 3 months, its recent returns have investors worried.

On 22 December 2020, the U.S Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC)filed a lawsuit against Ripple Labs. The lawsuit alleged that Ripple had raised $1.3 billion through the sale of unregistered securities (XRP). In addition to this, the SEC also brought charges against Ripples top executives, Christian Larsen (Co-founder) and Brad Garlinghouse (CEO), citing that they had made personal gains totaling $600 million in the process.

The SEC argued that XRP should be considered security rather than a cryptocurrency and as such, should be under their purview.

A verdict in favor of the SEC will set a rather unpleasant legal precedent for the broader crypto market. This is why this case is being closely observed by stakeholders in the industry.

It is evident that developments in the lawsuit have a direct impact on XRPs price. Following the news of the lawsuit in 2020, XRP tanked by almost 25%. In April 2021, the judge handed Ripple a small victory by granting them access to SECs internal documents, which caused XRP to rise over the $1-mark A threshold that the crypto hadnt crossed in 3 years.

According to a tweet by Defense Attorney James Filan on 15 August 2022, the U.S District Court for the Southern District of New York dealt yet another blow to the SEC when Judge Sarah Netburn granted Ripples motion to serve subpoenas to obtain a set of video recordings for the purpose of authentication, dismissing the regulators claim that Ripple was trying to reopen discovery. This was in response to Ripples motion filed on 3 August 2022.

In the Opinion & Order published earlier in July, Judge Sarah Netburn condemned the SEC for its hypocrisy and actions which suggested that the regulator was adopting its litigation positions to further its desired goal, and not out of a faithful allegiance to the law.

The lawsuits verdict, whatever it is, will have a lasting impact on XRPs value. It is important to note that a verdict in favor of the SEC would make XRP security only in the U.S because the regulator does not have jurisdiction across the countrys borders. This should offset some of the damage to Ripple, given that it has a substantial amount of business globally

Carol Alexander, Professor of Finance at the University of Sussex, believes that XRP is unlike any other crypto. She believes that if Ripple manages to beat the SEC lawsuit, it could start taking on the SWIFT banking system. SWIFT is a messaging network that financial institutions use to securely transmit information and instructions.

In an interview with CNBC, Ripple CEO Brad Garlinghouse talked about the possibility of an IPO after the case with the SEC is resolved. Ripple going public will have a significant impact on XRPs price action in the following years.

In an interview with Axios at Collision 2022, Garlinghouse further stated that the current price of XRP has already factored in Ripple losing the case. If Ripple loses the case, does anything change? Its basically just status quo, he added.

As for his personal opinion on the verdict, Garlinghouse is betting that it will be in favor of Ripple. Im betting that because I think the facts are on our side. Im betting that because the law is on our side, he remarked.

Curiously, support for Ripple and XRP hasnt been universal really, with Ethereums Vitalik Buterin recently commenting,

XRP already lost their right to protection when they tried to throw us under the bus as China-controlled imo

Ripple and the SECs lawsuit is not just restricted to the courtroom. The matter is often covered by the media with both parties having been featured in multiple op-eds, often criticizing each other. Just this month, the market watchdog and the crypto firm were the subject of a heated exchange through pieces published by the Wall Street Journal.

On August 10, SEC Chairman Gary Gensler reiterated his stance on the definition of crypto assets and their oversight in his op-ed piece featured in The Wall Street Journal. Make no mistake: If a lending platform is offering securities, it . . . falls into SEC jurisdiction.

Chairman Gensler went on to cite the $100 million settlement that the regulator had reached with BlockFi, stating that the crypto markets must comply with time-tested securities laws. As per the terms of the settlement, BlockFi has to rearrange its business to comply with the U.S Investment Company Act of 1940 in addition to registering under the Securities Act of 1933 to sell its products.

In response to Chairman Genslers op-ed, Stu Alderoty published his own piece in The Wall Street Journal and did not mince his words while taking a shot at the regulator. Alderoty accused Gensler of side-lining fellow regulators (CFTC, FDIC etc.) and overreaching its jurisdiction, as opposed to the executive order by U.S President Joe Biden, which directed agencies to coordinate on regulations for crypto.

What we need is regulatory clarity for crypto, not the SEC swinging its billy club to protect its turf at the expense of the more than 40 million Americans in the crypto economy, Alderoty added.

A controversial article authored by Roslyn Layton in Forbes on 28 August pointed out that since 2017, the SECs Crypto Assets Unit has been involved in 200-odd lawsuits. According to Layton, this figure suggests that instead of coming up with clear regulations to ensure compliance, the regulator would rather engage crypto firms with lawsuits in an attempt to regulate by enforcement.

Ripple CTO David Schwartz found himself in a stand-off with Ethereum Co-Founder Vitalik Buterin earlier this month, after Buterin took a dig at XRP on twitter. Schwartz hit back and responded to Buterins tweet, comparing miners in the PoW ecosystems like Ethereum to stockholders of companies like eBay.

I do think its perfectly fair to analogise miners in PoW systems to stockholders in companies. Just as eBays stockholders earn from the residual friction between buyers and sellers that eBay does not remove, so do miners in ETH and BTC, Schwartz added.

Now, putting an accurate figure on the future price of XRP is not an easy job. However, as long as there are cryptocurrencies, there will be crypto pundits offering their two cents on market movements.

Changelly has gathered an average prediction of $0.47 for XRP by the end of 2022. As for 2025, Changelly has provided a range between $1.47 to $1.76 at max for XRP.

Finders conclusion from a panel of thirty-six industry experts, is that XRP should be at $3.61 by 2025. It should be noted that not all of those experts agree on that forecast. Some of them believe that the crypto wont even cross the $1 threshold by 2025. Keegan Francis, the global cryptocurrency editor for Finder, does not agree with the panel of experts. He predicts that XRP will be worth $0.50 by the end of 2025 and, surprisingly, a mere $0.10 in 2030.

According to data published on Nasdaq, the average projection for 2025 is around $3.66.

Are your XRP holdings flashing green? Check the profit calculator

Finders experts had a rather conservative figure for XRP in 2030. They believe that the crypto could hit $4.98 by 2030. In a statement to Finder, Matthew Harry, the Head of Funds at DigitalX Asset Management, revealed that he doesnt see any utility in XRP other than the speculation element.

According to data published on Nasdaqs website, the average projection for 2030 is around $18.39.

Year-to-date (YTD) figures from Ripples Quarter 2 earnings report have made it clear that despite the drop in XRPs price, demand for their On-Demand Liquidity service not only remained undeterred but actually grew by nine times year-over-year (YoY) with ODL sales totalling $2.1 billion in Q2. The report further stated that Ripple has pledged $100 million for carbon removal activities, in line with their carbon neutral objective and sustainability goals.

Ripples Crypto Trends report claims that NFTs and CBDCs are still in their nascent stages and as their potential is gradually realized, its impact on Ripples network and on the broader blockchain space will be visible.

It should be noted that while various experts have predicted XRPs price to increase in the following years, there are some who believe that XRP will lose all value by the end of the decade.

The major factors that will influence XRPs price in the coming years are:

Predictions are not immune to changing circumstances, and they will always be updated on new developments.

With the Fear and Greed index leaning towards fear at press time, it implies that more investors were experiencing confidence regarding Ripple.

Read this article:

Ripple (XRP) Price Prediction 2025-2030: Assessing if XRP will fly after the lawsuit - AMBCrypto News