Archive for the ‘Wikipedia’ Category

ChatGPT and GPT4: Wikipedia 2.0 or a fresh starting point for society? – IT-Online

The history of the internet is awash with cautionary tales. Stories of catastrophe that never came to pass like the millennium bug to widely lauded, future-altering innovations that have faded to become a mere stitch in the tapestry of the worlds digital footprint.

By Joe Baguley, vice-president and chief technology officer of VMware EMEA

The nature of technology and its cycle of self-perpetuating betterment means that there will always be the next big thing. In this regard, step forward ChatGPT and its subsequent updates such as GPT4.

The claxon of caution

Since the tail end of 2022, ChatGPT has been that thing. The white knight to solve the ills of modern society. Depending on which news source you read, it will improve; how we study, write, research, code, work, create and evolve in the workplace. There is more, of course, because the potential use cases are endless, but there are also grounds to sound the klaxon of caution.

For a start, weve been here before. People of a certain age will recall the fanfare to which Wikipedia arrived. That too was going to revolutionise how we learn and research. That too was going to change the world. And did it? Im afraid not quite.

What happened is what is almost certain to happen to ChatGPT and the innovations that follow after it. That it evolved to become a tool, albeit an incredibly useful one. A tool in the box that helps our day-to-day lives alongside the other incredible tools that have been developed in recent years, like Alexa or next-day delivery. On its own, will it change how we operate? Almost certainly. Will it change the world? Almost certainly not. Like Wikipedia, we will grow to learn its limits.

An AI-infused world

Perhaps the key question is, where and how far will it catapult society? The excitement around ChatGPT stems from what it is, not necessarily what it does. By consumerising an artificial intelligence (AI) product into something everyone can use it has opened our eyes to the realities of an AI-infused world.

The fact is, that this is happening already in sectors such as healthcare (for early detection, image scanning and analysis and predictive care to name a few examples) and manufacturing (for instance, to increase production capabilities and cut emissions) but those applications are limited only to a select few, hence the massive disparity in reaction.

The reality is, we are already in an AI-infused world of which ChatGPT is simply the next chapter and it wont be the last. It is, however, a very clear signpost as to where we go from here. The Genie is out of the bottle as far as the positive impacts AI can have but beyond the excitement and appetite to use it as a digital travelator to get to the next point more quickly, society needs to harness it appropriately.

This means starting at an education-level. Were already seeing reports of it being used in exams. In a recent test, it passed law exams in four courses at the University of Minnesota and another exam at University of Pennsylvanias Wharton School of Business, according to a story on CNN.

Unsurprisingly, were also seeing tools being developed to detect and prevent its usage. This creates a developmental cat and mouse whereby students will want to use it both because they cant, and because they shouldnt. But this sends out a wrong message and arguably fuels the fire of scepticism around AI. Knowing that theyre here to stay, we should accept ChatGPT and other AI tools into education and encourage people on how to best engage with them.

Essentially, to use every tool in the box to get the job done better and quicker because this is the world of work they will walk into.

Embrace AI to do something better

The same message applies to businesses. It is far too linear to suggest that these types of AI advances alone will kill job X or Y while that, in and of itself, isnt the end of the chain anyway. Just because ChatGPT can create job adverts, brand copy or legal letters does not mean businesses ought to dismiss their HR, marketing and legal teams.

Far from it. These teams are more vital than ever because their years of experience, diverse backgrounds, soft human skills and unique personalities are not only what is required to get a job done today, theyre the foundation of society tomorrow.

The cleverest businesses and the ones who will come out on top in the end will be the ones who get to grips with these types of innovation. To learn them, incorporate them into day-to-day operations and evolve the skills of their teams accordingly and in lockstep with any new development.

Microsofts new 365 Copilot is just another example of such tech rapidly being integrated into existing business tools. The leaders will be the companies that embrace AI to do something better than they are doing today without jettisoning the people and skills required to adapt to our ever-changing world.

Another way to look at it is that early machine code developers didnt disappear because we invented compilers what in fact happened was that more and more people could access the power of computing as coding became progressively easier and easier with each generation; with generative AI such as GPT4 now generating code and creating websites from sketches it will just enable even more people to engage and create.

Understanding limitations

We will, of course, reach a point where enough is enough as far as AI is concerned. Perhaps in years to come well reach that moment and identify this period as the start of that journey, but it is a long way from now. What it will look like is an age-old question. A moral and societal issue far too deep to cover here, though Professor Stuart Russell did so expertly in his 2021 Reith Lectures.

All we have now is a new technology, no more, no less. ChatGPT is a computer system taking big steps forward in communication and generation, and that is an amazing advancement, but using this tool and combining it with other tools alongside the scientific method and human intelligence is where the real excitement is. In short order we are already discovering its flaws and limits.

Thinking critically about combinations and application is how and where we can realise the potential of AI to change lives for the better. Once again we should look at how technology augments humans and advances us all. In order to do that, we first have to understand limitations and that were always in the middle of history, never the end.

Related

Continued here:
ChatGPT and GPT4: Wikipedia 2.0 or a fresh starting point for society? - IT-Online

Letters for April | Letters to the Editor – The Critic

This article is taken from the April 2023 issue of The Critic. To get the full magazine why not subscribe? Right now were offering five issues for just 10.

Plane untrustworthy

A sincere thank you for the helpful, fact-filled (unlike Wikipedia) and ultimately depressing article WHO WATCHES THE WIKIPEDIA EDITORS? (MARCH).

As an example, I would like to point readers to the Wikipedia entry for Norwich City Station (checked 20 March 2023). It states, The station was further damaged when a badly damaged USAF B24 Liberator bomber was deliberately crashed there to avoid greater loss of life, with no reference to check this.

Suffice it to say that proper history books, for instance A J Wrottesleys The Midland and Great Northern Joint Railway, and N J L Digbys The Stations and Structures of The Midland and Great Northern Joint Railway: Volume 2, Norwich to Peterborough and Little Bytham, a magisterial work of great depth and erudition, fail to mention this at all.

While there are many easily found photos of the bombing raid, one would have thought that such a significant event as a deliberately crashed bomber would have been of great interest. How do you deliberately aim a badly damaged bomber at a specific site in the middle of a lot of housing with no recorded loss of life from crew or civilians on the ground?

In our house Wikipedia is avoided as much as possible, and rudely labelled Wankipedia as it is load of old cock.

R Lincoln

Groby, Leicestershire

Green screen

In his interesting article about Henry Green (AN OFF-KILTER VISIONARY, MARCH), Alexander Larman stated that there is no definitive biography.

I would be interested to learn of what he thinks are the shortcomings of Jeremy Treglowns biography, Romancing, published in 2000.

He also believes that none of Greens books has been filmed. However, a film of Loving was made by BBC Northern Ireland in 1996, starring Mark Rylance.

Graeme Creffield

Hemel Hempstead, Herts

A swift correction

Fergus Butler-Gallie (SOUNDING BOARD, MARCH) quotes Jonathan Swifts Gullivers Travels but misplaces the condemnation of humans as the most pernicious race of little odious vermin.

This does not occur in Book IV of the novel as might be expected with its portrayal of the Yahoos but at the close of Book Two Chapter VI where the King of Brobdingnag draws his scathing conclusion after listening to Gulliver eulogising his homeland.

Swifts irony is so pointed that at the beginning of the next chapter (Book Two Chapter VII) he has Gulliver point out that I artfully eluded many of his questions and gave to every point a more favourable turn by many degrees than the strictness of truth would allow which results in the reader wondering just how savage the Kings conclusions would have been had he been told the truth by Gulliver.

Tony Macilwraith

Worcester

Figures and form

Please remind Simon Heffer (HAVE WE LOST OUR MINDS? MARCH) that 29 Labour MPs were elected in 1906 three years before the Peoples Budget, not two.

On the subject of Russian aggression (Mark Almond, THE BALLOON GOES UP, MARCH), India has form. She failed to condemn Moscow over Hungary in 1956 or Czechoslovakia in 1968.

Mark Taha

Ealing, London

Failing the test

I enjoyed reading Christopher Snowdons balanced perspective on grammar schools (THE ROOTS OF SCHOOL RAGE, MARCH). One of the issues mentioned, but not contested, was Hitchens champions selection by ability. There is no psychological reason that a test should be set at eleven years, it is for administrative purposes. The idea that development is set in stone at this age is untenable.

The belief that one test, on one day, can accurately measure academic ability is problematic. For example, an individual may be ill or nervous, and fail to fulfil their potential. There is also confusion about the construct validity of the test: does it actually measure academic skills/intelligence? (Never mind the excessive private tutoring for the test which tests the idea of selection by ability.)

In a democratic country there would need to be some overwhelming reason to segregate people, and if that community is not even prepared to set up a comprehensive and valid diagnostic tool as the starting point, there may always be many people who will be critical of grammar schools.

Michael Moore

Loughton, Essex

Sideways mobility

Christopher Snowdon has some telling observations in his piece on grammar schools. The head of my South London grammar school wrote in his autobiography that he had seen an important part of his job being to turn working-class boys into middle-class men. One of my old schoolmates observed when I told him this, Not necessary in my case. Not necessary in most cases.

Harry Harmer

Shrewsbury, Shropshire

Original post:
Letters for April | Letters to the Editor - The Critic

Sprouts Permanently Closing Major California Location at the End of … – NewsBreak Original

The company has blamed performance-related issues for the closure.

Authors Note

This article is based on corporate postings and accredited media reports. Linked information within this article is attributed to the following outlets: Wikipedia.org, ScrapeHero.com, and ABC10.com.

Introduction

Wikipedia features a comprehensive overview of the Sprouts Farmers Market chain, that was founded in July of 2002: Sprouts Farmers Market, Inc., is a supermarket chain headquartered in Phoenix, Arizona, U.S. The grocer offers a wide selection of natural and organic foods, including fresh produce, bulk foods, vitamins and supplements, packaged groceries, meat and seafood, deli, baked goods, dairy products, frozen foods, natural body care and household items. Sprouts employs more than 35,000 workers and operates more than 380 stores in 23 states. A typical store is around 30,000 square feet.

California presently hosts the most Sprouts locations in the United States.

For an up-to-date location count, according to ScrapeHero.com: There are 394 sprouts retail stores in the United States as of March 27, 2023. The state with the most number of sprouts locations in the U.S. is California, with 134 retail stores, which is about 34% of all sprouts retail stores in the U.S.

Now comes word that a deluxe California location will soon be permanently closing its doors.

Let us explore further.

Sprouts, 2023

According to a report from Sprouts Closing Roseville Location Near Costco, the entity is permanently shuttering due to performance-based issues.

As excerpted from the report: Sprouts Farmers Market is closing one of its Roseville locations at the end of April. Sprouts, located near Costco on 6760 Stanford Ranch Road, will close Sunday, April 30. The store will be open seven days a week from 7 a.m. to 10 p.m. until it closes for good. Lucas Larson, a Regional Vice President of Sprouts, said in a statement this location is about 30% larger than other locations and underperformed financially.

Conclusion

This is a developing story. In the event of pertinent updates to this matter, inclusive of official announcements of potential replacement stores, I will share them here on NewsBreak.

Thank you for reading.

View post:
Sprouts Permanently Closing Major California Location at the End of ... - NewsBreak Original

Who owns the Water? The Tragedy of Commons! BigWire – Big Wire, news that matters

Share

Share

Share

Email

Who owns the Water?- remaining within the cuddle of my grandfather, I asked this question to my genius, non-digital Wikipedia.

In those early childhood days, my grandfather used to be my one-stop solution, having answers to all the queries as well as ready to fulfill all my wishes.

If I get caught up by any issues or messed up with any puzzle then I looked at him for the solution. On one occasion, while playing football I felt thirsty as I had forgotten to carry my water bottle to the playground.

I asked my friend Rohit, to lend me his water bottle to which he vehemently refused by saying that I wont give it to you, this is my Virat Kohli Wala Black Water.

I felt offensive by his rejection; however, I held my emotion at that point of time and converted that unhappiness to philosophical one during my story time with grandpa.

Smilingly he said, no one owns the water my dear, it is a free good, a gift from Mother Nature to all her children.

You can only collect it and use it but cannot own it. Each species on this earth should have equal access to this pollution free and natural free good as it is the primary requirement to hold life on this planet.

This validation by my paladin erupted the underneath anguish and gloominess.

Immediately I asked him then why did Rohit said, it is my water and did not lend me to drink?

May be he could understood the pain of denial of few sip of water during intense thirst for which his casual grip around me converted to a hold, filled with warmth.

His voice got infused with kindness, compassion and he said, Rohit didnt do the right thing by denying water to a thirsty boy. You know dear, in our time declining the request for water to a thirstful person used to be a very bad manner.

To move on from that sorrow and misery of mine he shifted the conversation to a higher philosophical engagement.

You see! Claiming ownership over water is a modern day concept propelled by the market oriented temperament.

Water exists on earth in all its three forms and rotation in these stages of water making completion of hydrological cycle thus balances the availability of water for consumption by different species.

Mostly when it remains in the liquid form, it flows towards the sea and along its path it quenches the need of different species like trees, animals, birds and humans.

Off all the species, humans have discovered the ways to harness the maximum benefit out of it along with polluting, exhausting and claiming ownership over the waterbodies.

Further continuing his dialogue with me he said, Half a century back, water sources used to be venerated with great respect and utmost care were taken to refrain from polluting the water bodies.

Springs were considered to be the most prized possessions of communities and rivers as well as big water bodies were treated as holy and place of worship.

However, the reverence and respect for the water bodies slowly disappeared over time with the supply of tap water at home.

Instantly a question pop-up in my head, did you have tap water as well in your childhood days?

We used to drink water directly from our open wells.

Listening to my question a nostalgic smile emerged on his face as if he was remembering his old days. With a fixed gaze somewhere, as if he were encountering his old good days, he said, we didnt have any tap water in our village rather open wells were our supplier of water for household consumption and for cattle, agricultural purpose we were dependent on ponds and flowing river channels.

A sudden rush of happiness emerged in grandpas face, looking straight into my eyes he said, Our open well water used to be very cool and pleasant during summer and during winter it used to be slightly warm and regarding taste, it had a poignant, sweet taste, sweetest among all the village households.

My mother used to complain that as I drank too much water my stomach got filled and I barely feed anything. A happy smile surfaced on his face while my mind got encapsulated with another question.

So abruptly I intervened in to his dialogue by saying, but grandpa, water is color less, odorless and tasteless, then how come your water was so tasty and cool without refrigeration?

With a convincing smile he said, What you are saying are text book writings, but practically the taste and smell varies depending upon the source of water that you are drawing from.

If you take tap water, the taste and odor remains the same across most of the regions as it is being processed in a standard procedure in a purified plant.

But if you take water from a well, depending on the layer of stone that the water has travelled through, the taste changes.

Different layers of mineral stone have their add-on effect on the water quality and taste.

The stream water, the pond water and the water from river has their own unique taste, odour because of the presence of different mineral component.

With regard to color, as the water travels through the soil or rock it gathers the color of the material. Black Water, as your friend mentioned, is blackish in color as it passes through fulvic minerals and captures the black color.

In our childhood days to purify the river water we used to adopt this method of cleaning the water by passing it through sand and charcoal.

In order to make me understand the importance of water he caressed my head and said, You know dear, water is a very prominent component in our daily life. Without food we can survive for a couple of days but without water it is very difficult to survive even two days.

That is why the erstwhile wealthy people used to dug ponds and wells for the larger cause of the humanity.

Liquid water is a gift of Mother Nature to all her children inclusive of all the species.

While celebrating the World Water Day on 22nd March, the erstwhile conversation with my grandfather cropped up in my mind.

The water scarcity is looming large over the earth due to mismanagement of surface water and un-mindful drawing up of groundwater.

It is high time that the humanity should work together to ensure water conservation is promoted so that there is enough water available for each and every species.

If we fail in saving enough water, probably the days are not far ahead that we may end up in war for water only.

See the original post here:
Who owns the Water? The Tragedy of Commons! BigWire - Big Wire, news that matters

Wikipedia’s new sound logo had a seriously ambitious design brief – Creative Bloq

Most designers will have received some tough briefs in their time, but Wikipedia's call for proposals for a sound logo was a particularly tall order. The community-run online encyclopaedia wanted nothing less than "the sound of all human knowledge" for its new audio identifier.

And it thinks it's found it in a sonic logo that will be rolled out from mid-year. So what does the sound of all human knowledge sound like? Well, it's a mix of traditional and contemporary sources of learning: a flutter of pages turning and frantic typing followed by some chirpy electronic chimes (see our pick of the best logos for inspiration for visual identities).

Strictly speaking, a logo is a visual identity, but sound idents are frequently called sound logos or sonic logos, since they serve much the same function. And they can be hugely effective. Just think of Apple's start-up chime, Intel's signature 'bong' or Netflix's 'ta-dum'. Hear them, and you instantly recall the brands (see our pick of the best audio logos for more examples).

Wikipedia wanted something similar to serve for "projects when visual logos are not an option". True to its collaborative community-sourced nature it opened the quest up to the public through a contest, which opened in September. Six months on, it's picked a winner from over 3,200 submissions received from 2,094 people in 135 countries.

The winning audio logo was created by nuclear scientist Thaddeus Osborne, who wins $2,500 for his creation and will be flown to a professional recording studio in London to help produce the final version. He says that music has always been a huge part of his life and "a way for me to 'travel the world from my small town backyard."

Osborne's creation sounds both novel and somehow familiar. The combination of fluttering pages and clicking keys feels apt to communicate the concept of a digital encyclopedia, while the rising synthesizer chimes feel optimistic and comfortingly, almost like something we already know. The Wikipedia Foundation says it hopes to have the final sound ready for use by June.

Making your own sound logos? See our pick of the best laptops for music production. We also have a guide to the best audio editing software.

Read more:

Read this article:
Wikipedia's new sound logo had a seriously ambitious design brief - Creative Bloq