Archive for the ‘Wikipedia’ Category

Art+Feminism Wikipedia Edit-a-Thon Returns to Museum of Modern Art – artnet News

As part of its celebration of Womens History Month in March, New Yorks Museum of Modern Art will host its fourth annual Art+Feminism Wikipedia Edit-a-Thon on March 11.

Given the current political climate, the organizers believe that the event is more crucial than ever. Weve been deeply disturbed by the sheer amount of fake news on social media, and its possible influence on the recent US election, said Art+Feminism organizers Sin Evans, Jacqueline Mabey, McKensie Mack, and Michael Mandiberg in a statement.

Wikipedia is something that belongs to all of us, they added. Its not a privately held resource, its content isnt motivated by the whims of any owners. When you have a government actively pushing alternative facts, improving the reliability and completeness of Wikipedia is an important act of everyday resistance.

In addition to providing tutorials for inexperienced Wikipedia users and reference materials about female artists, the organizers will host programming throughout the day.

Kimberly Drew. Courtesy Kimberly Drew.

Kimberly Drew, the social media manager of New Yorks Metropolitan Museum of Art, will kick things off at 10 a.m., moderating a panel with writer Joanne McNeil and Data & Society Research Institute fellow Zara Rahman about how to accurately find and disseminate reliable sources on difficult-to-accessnews items.

The MoMA is just one of a number of edit-a-thons from Art+Feminism happening across the world this March, at sites including the Art Gallery of Ontario; the Aspen Art Museum, Colorado; the Institute of Contemporary Art, Boston; and the National Museum of Women in the Arts (NMWA), Washington, DC, and beyond.

Other art-themed initiatives promoting Womens History Monthinclude the second year of the NMWAs popular social media campaign. BeginningMarch 1, the worlds only major museum honoring womens contributions to the arts will again promote the hashtag #5WomenArtists, challenging participants to see if they can even namefive artists who are female.

Over 11,000 individuals and 400 institutions from 20 countries shared their favorite women artists using the hashtag, helping publicize the need forgender parity in the arts. For 2017, 150 institutions from 41 states, 16 countries, and five continents have already announced their planned participation. To learn more about women artists, keep an eye on NMWAs Facebook, Twitter,Instagram,website, and blogthroughoutthe month.

Art+Feminisms fourth annual Wikipedia Edit-a-thon will take place at the Museum of Modern Arts Dorothy and Lewis B. Cullman Education and Research Building, 4 West 54 Street, New York on Saturday, March 11, 2017,10 a.m.5 p.m.

Continue reading here:
Art+Feminism Wikipedia Edit-a-Thon Returns to Museum of Modern Art - artnet News

A young Wikipedia editor withstood a decade of online abuse. Now she’s fighting back on Wikipedia itself. – Backchannel

A young Wikipedia editor withstood a decade of online abuse. Now shes fighting backon Wikipedia itself.

The fuck you project crystallized one Friday night last year. As Emily Temple-Wood video-chatted with friends, an email pinged in her inbox:

There are alternate realities where I raped you and got away with it, it read. In those realities its legal for me to rape you as long as I want and as hard as I want. I am dead serious.

The note came from someone with a history of harassing the 22-year-old medical student. This man hates women, Temple-Wood thought to herself. Then she had another thought. What do misogynists hate more than successful women?

Nothing.

Shed been receiving vicious emails for a decade. Sometimes she sought solace by commiserating with friends, or by stomping off to do something else, or occasionallyafter the cruelest messagesby lying on her bed and crying. Temple-Wood became a frequent target of abuse merely because she is the rare female Wikipedia editor who has been active on the site for years. She manages to let much of the harassment slide off her. But many women eventually find the bullying to be too much, and leave the site.

Across the internet, trolls disproportionately target women and members of other underrepresented groups. On Twitter, Reddit, YouTube, Wikipedia, and other open platforms, victims of harassment are forced to make a difficult choicego silent and preserve their mental health, or try to ignore the abuse and continue expressing themselves openly online. As the wounds deepen, that latter choice becomes harder and harder to justify.

When people get forced off the web, their voices disappear from the internets public squares. The ideas and memes that dominate skew even further toward a white male perspective. The web becomes less interesting, less representative, less valuable. We all lose.

But on that Friday night, Temple-Wood had an idea. For every harassing email, death threat, or request for nude photos that she received, she resolved to create a Wikipedia biography on a notable woman scientist who was previously unknown to the free online encyclopedia. She thought of it as a giant fuck you to the anonymous idiots seeking to silence her.

Temple-Wood didnt want to give up her voicethe web was the only place where she felt free to be herself. Growing up in suburban Chicago, Temple-Wood was the type of middle schooler who refused to stand for the Pledge of Allegiance, because she thought the idea of making children swear a loyalty oath was bizarre. Her rebellious streak didnt win her many friends, and she found herself yanked up by the elbows by her classmates and chided by adults at assembly.

The first time she tried editing Wikipedia, in 2007, she created a page under an anonymous account to taunt her younger sister. Sophie is a butt-headby Emily! she wrote. To her, it was a fun little prank. To the tiny minority of web users who constantly edit Wikipedias millions of articles, it was something else entirely: vandalism. They saw Temple-Woods edits as not all that different from scratching windows on a public bus or spray painting someones front fence. (They quickly erased the butt-head page.)

Oblivious to the unseen legions powering that online resource, Temple-Wood continued exploring Wikipedia in the hours after she got home from school. With a shock, one day she realized there were actual people creating and maintaining the site, for free. Sitting in front of her home computer, she started to regret her prank. I felt bad for wasting somebodys time, she says. So I thought, Ill do something to make up for it.

Temple-Wood decided to tackle the nuts-and-bolts of article categorization. I discovered easy ways to contribute; things that your average smart, motivated 12-year-old could do, she recalls.

Under the username Keilana, her account history shows that her first edit took place on April 30, 2007: a minor category tweak to an article about a Taiwanese pop stars fourth Mandarin studio album. Four days later, Temple-Wood added a snippet of information about the naming of the asteroid 1952 Hesburgh, and left this comment for her fellow editors: Added more info, needs to be expanded a lot; nasa.gov has a lot of tables and such, but since Im not an astronomer, I cant decipher them. Perhaps someone could? Thanks.

Bit by bit, she slowly sculpted and rearranged material so that the resource became easier for everyone to use. In short order, she threw herself into reverting vandalism as well as fixing typos, creating talk pages for new users, sorting and tagging stubs, and rewriting articles concerning, say, Powderfinger albums or the Kurukh language, which is spoken by millions of people in south Asia. When youre 12, pretty much everyone is better than you at certain things, she tells me over Skype. Yet by the end of 2007, she was a site administrator, having quickly earned a favorable reputation among the editorial community. Few of her fellow editors realized their newest admin was a 12-year-old girl.

In this unique community of intellectuals, geeks, subject-matter experts and sharp wits, Temple-Wood found a playground where, for the first time, she fit right in. Here, she was judged by the accuracy and quality of her work, rather than by her age, gender, or appearance. Known only as Keilana, this outsider had discovered her tribe.

Over time, Keilanas confidence grew, but her outspoken, high-achieving nature made her a target for hateful emails and messages from anonymous trolls, both on-Wiki and off. People have been harassing me since the first vandal figured out I was a lady, she says, Which was within a month or so of my joining the site.

Wikipedia, which started in 2001, has about 30,000 people who are classed as active English-language editors, meaning theyve logged on to make at least five changes in the last month. As with any large and intellectually robust online community, an undercurrent of hostility is never far away. Minor disagreements can flare into harassment if theyre not dealt with promptly and transparently.

When Keilana first started receiving nasty messages, their contents came as a shock. Theres only so many Youre a faggot bitch Nazi Illuminati slut! comments you can take at that age, she says. In 2008, when she was 14, her userpage became a regular target for vandals, who would replace its contents with I am a fat lonely bitch. Or: I have no friends. Or: DISREGARD THAT I SUCK COCKS.

She admits that her reaction to these attacks, either on-Wiki or in private message, was usually unproductiveI stayed up all night getting in stupid internet fights a couple times, because I was so irritated by people. Keilana elected to keep these battles private. Meanwhile, she was also dealing with real-life bullying in middle school. I was a kiddo, so I wasnt super great at coping, she reflects. There was lots of crying.

In November 2012, after more than five years of dealing with online filth, Temple-Wood decided enact her revenge. Ive always been a shit stirrer, she says. I had to do something with that angry energy, and let it off in a productive way.

As Temple-Wood well knew, it takes a special kind of person to invest their free time in improving this free resource, and for this reason, biases abound. About 90 percent of Wikipedias editors are male, so the encyclopedias 5.32 million articles tend to skew toward the achievements and interests of men. So to thumb her nose at her harassers, she started the Women Scientists WikiProject, to improve the quality and coverage of biographies of notable achievers in this field. Unfortunately, part of Wikipedias systemic bias is that women in science are woefully underrepresented. Lets change that! reads a note at the top of the project page. The community now includes 90 editors.

Shes not the only person leading an effort to increase diversity on Wikipediapublic gatherings to promote inspirational women, African American artists and LGBT-related content, known as edit-a-thons, pop up sporadically. But Aaron Halfaker, a principal research scientist at Wikimedia Foundation, noticed that starting in mid-2013about six months after Temple-Wood kicked off the WikiProjectarticles about women scientists began to grow much faster than the rest of Wikipedia.

In the process of creating almost 400 articles, many of which concern notable women scientists, Temple-Wood has learned how historys great women overcame their own challenges. Reading and writing about women who dealt with so much garbage helps me deal with garbage, she says, offering an example from 1878: Caroline Still Anderson was told that she couldnt have an internship in Boston because she was a lady and she was black, and black ladies couldnt be doctors. She marched in, and lectured them until they let her do it! Alright, I feel better now!

As her online profile grew, she set up filters to deal with the influx of emails from unknown senders. Vandals have made edits to the Wikipedia article in her name, such as: Temple is trying to get all male scientists to take estrogen on a monthly basis in order to better become to Temples likeness. Or: Wood has blow up dolls of her favorite female scientists that she has fun with a lot.

Patrick Earley, a member of Wikimedia Foundations seven-person Support and Safety team, believes that many misunderstandings and bad interactions arise because people on the site communicate solely in text. Some people write drive-by comments that contain horrifically insulting or violent stuff, says Earley. The community is very supportive, and it will generally be removed quite quickly, but the psychological effect of it is there.

There are definitely times where I cry and lose it, or feel really bad and let it get to me, says Temple-Wood. All of us who handle harassment well have times where we dont. We snipe at loved ones, or we sit in the shower and cry.

Jake Orlowitz, the head of The Wikipedia Library, was at the annual Wikimedia conference in Mexico City in July 2015 when he witnessed Temple-Woods anger and frustration boil over. Out of nowhere, Emily turns red and chucks her cell phone against the wall, recalls Orlowitz. She was not in the mood for another death threat, and thats what had come to her inbox. But at this point, its very clear that somehow, Emily is fueled by every challenge.

That day, they were about to head into a closed-doors discussion about how Wikipedia can better handle online harassment. Of that incident, Temple-Wood says, That was the last time I really felt that awful. It gets better.

Until he met her in person, Orlowitz only knew Temple-Wood by her username, and he remains a friend and admirer. Its incredibly dangerous to invite attention from misogynist internet trolls; its not trivial, he says. But she did it in such a graceful, badass, strong and clever way, and I think its one of the best fuck yous Ive seen. Its exciting to watch her turn that pattern of harassment on its head and say, Come at me, bros! Send me your emails from wherever youre hiding from, and each time you do, a little more money is going to go into the Bank of Women!

In her decade of editing Wikipedia, Temple-Wood has made more than 57,600 edits. Her extensive contributions to articles concerning endometrial and ovarian cancers are read by hundreds of thousands of people each year. In June 2016, she became a joint recipient of the Wikipedian of the Year award, alongside Rosie Stephenson-Goodknight, a 60-year-old health care administrator in California who is similarly active in combating harassment and increasing the encyclopedias coverage of notable women.

Temple-Wood is now studying medicine at Chicagos Midwestern University, but in her spare moments she chips away at the Women Scientists WikiProject. In mid-November, for instance, she expanded a stub shed started in late August on Cuchlaine King, a British geomorphologist known for her work in glaciology.

Temple-Wood taunts the trolls by ensuring that great achievers arent forgotten. Because of her and her fellow project membersand the unrelenting abuse she has receivedits now a fact that strong, smart, and resilient women scientists are becoming more visible online. She takes the trolls energy, and deftly sculpts it into something more lasting. Or as she puts it: We have to polish those turds as best we can!

Creative Art Direction: Redindhi Studio Illustration by: Laurent Hrybyk

Originally posted here:
A young Wikipedia editor withstood a decade of online abuse. Now she's fighting back on Wikipedia itself. - Backchannel

There’s a Major War Brewing Over the Acupuncture Wikipedia Page – Observer

There have been any number of illicit Wikipedia edits in recent years, mostly to the pages of celebrities like Taylor Swift and Rudolph the Red-Nosed Reindeer. But the latest Wikipedia war centers on medical science, specifically the efficacy of acupuncture.

Currently theWikipedia page for this form of traditional Chinese medicine (TCM)in which thin needles are inserted into the body contains the sentence TCM theory and practice are not based upon scientific knowledgeand acupuncture is a pseudoscience.

Wikipedia further defines pseudoscience as claims, beliefs, or practices presented as being plausible scientifically, but which are not justifiable by the scientific method and lists astrology, alchemy and creationism as examples of said beliefs.

Physicians around the world are outraged that Wikipedias editors have grouped acupuncture with these disciplines. Li Jingxin, vice president of the Chinese Association of Acupuncture, told the website ChinaQWthat acupuncture is widely practiced and accepted, andjust because Western medicine is scientific is no reason to call Chinese medicineunscientific.'

A commenter on the Chinese blogging site Weibo was more blunt:Why isnt the research into the unknown by that fuckingHawking and his gang of scientists labelled pseudoscience?

But the main issue most people have with acupunctures classification is that it seemingly violates Wikipedias policy on neutral point of view, which reads that writers and editors should gatherfairly, proportionately and, as far as possible, without editorial bias, all of the significant views that have been published by reliable sources on a topic.

According to the articles edit history, the battle over the neutrality of acupuncture has been going on for at least two months. Some of the choice comments include:

The Acupuncture Now Foundation, an advocacy group, is so passionate about this issue that it started a Change.org petition to combat the Wikibias. The online appeal, which has almost 3,600 signatures (its goal is 5,000), accuses Wikipedia of denialism and censorship, linking to message board posts from annoyed editors. It then asks co-founder Jimmy Wales to clean up the administration of the article.

Admittedly acupuncture is not a cure-allChinese actressXu Tingdied of cancer last year after choosing alternativetherapies like acupuncture over chemotherapy.

But as the petition points out in a direct plea to Wales, cases like this are in the minority and dont represent the general acupuncture experience.

Wikipedia is not remotely covering acupuncture appropriately, by your or any reasonable definition, the letter reads.

See original here:
There's a Major War Brewing Over the Acupuncture Wikipedia Page - Observer

Blunt’s Wikipedia page briefly changed to attack his support of DeVos as education secretary – STLtoday.com

WASHINGTON The Wikipedia biography of Sen. Roy Blunt, who has been receiving high volumes of social media protests over his plan to vote for Donald Trumps education secretary nominee, was temporarily changed to cast Blunts support for that nominee in a negative light.

The Missouri Republican has said he will vote for Betsy DeVos, the former Michigan Republican Party chair, whose views on charter schools and public education have drawn intense opposition from some educators and teachers unions. The vote is expected sometime Tuesday in the Senate and could be very close.

Two Republicans Lisa Murkowski of Alaska and Susan Collins of Maine have said they will oppose DeVos. That means that the best-case scenario for Trump to get his nominee through would come on a tie-breaking vote by Vice President Mike Pence.

Democrats have been trying to put pressure on one Republican to flip. On Monday, Sen. Patty Murray, D-Wash., on the Senate floor urged opponents to "keep making your voices heard" and said Senate Democrats would "double down" to try to get one more Republican to vote with them.

On Friday, two passages were added to Blunts biography on Wikipedia, an open-content, online encyclopedia. Wikipedia requires registration to begin an entry but not to edit one. The same unidentified user apparently added both lines, according to Wikipedia logs.

In a session about Blunts early life and pre-Washington career, one that mentioned his presidency of Southwest Baptist University, this line was added:

Mr. Blunt so despised his tenure in education that he supported the 2017 nomination of Betsy DeVos.

Later, a new section titled, Controversy, the following language was added:

In 2017, Senator Blunt faced backlash for his support of Betsy DeVos' nomination as Secretary of Education. DeVos and her organization All Children Matter contributed a total of at least $234,352.33 to the Senator and his causes. Despite her unpopularity and lack of experience in educational roles, Blunt declared his intention to support her candidacy. This resulted in thousands of constituents submitting their written and verbal disagreements.

About an hour after a story on the edits appeared in the Post-Dispatch, those passages were removed.

The source given for the amount of money was from an anti-Blunt blog post by a former teacherand journalist, and actually said that Blunt had received about $38,000 from DeVos or members of her family over multiple elections. The bulk of the larger figure was from a DeVos-supported activist group reported spending against Sen. Claire McCaskill, D-Mo., when McCaskill ran for governor against Roy Blunt's son, Matt, in 2004

Matt Blunt won that election by about 3 percentage points.

Sen. Roy Blunts Facebook page has lit up with opposition to the nomination, with many of the nearly 2,000 comments on a recent thread referring to opposition to either DeVos or Trump adviser Steve Bannon. Others opposing DeVos have been calling his Senate offices. And protesters against Trump's policies and nominees have gathered near Blunt's offices in the state.

Our offices, and all congressional offices, are seeing large call volumes that oppose the current administration on several issues, Blunt's communications director, Brian Hart, said. We have also seen increased efforts by support groups to call in as well.

Hart told the Post-Dispatch that the new material on Wikipedia breaks the rules of the site because it does not provide sources for the first claim, and that it is not objective in that it appears to copy an anti-Blunt blog post in the second.

Hart predicted the two recently added passages will likely be challenged and removed because of that lack of sourcing.

He said he and other members of Blunts Senate office are prohibited, by Wikipedia rules, from removing the material he considers incorrect. Otherwise we would help on a host of things that are posted incorrectly, Hart said.

Last week, Blunt, who chairs a Senate Appropriations subcommittee with jurisdiction over the Department of Education, issued this statement when he announced he would support DeVos:

I believe Betsy DeVos understands that decisions about education need to be made much closer to where kids are. I look forward to working with her to find ways to get those decisions back to local school boards, and moms and dads.

All Senate Democrats and independents, including Sens. Claire McCaskill, D-Mo.; Tammy Duckworth, D-Ill.; and Dick Durbin, D-Ill.; are expected to vote against DeVos.

In an email to supporters and potential donors last week, McCaskill wrote: Betsy DeVos never attended a public school. Shes never worked at a public school. She likes to talk about siphoning resources away from public schools so families have a choice but in rural Missouri, good public schools are often the only choice families have. Our small towns dont have the kinds of options available in urban centers.

Teachers opposed to DeVos were picketing outside Blunts Columbia office on Monday, during lunchtime on a professional development day.

I have colleagues who have never even called their representative or sent a letter suddenly every single teacher at my lunch table has done those things, MacKenzie Everett-Kennedy, an English teacher at Columbia's Hickman High School, said while protesting outside Blunts office there.

Everett-Kennedy said she and her fellow teachers watched DeVos confirmation hearing and that she was rankled that DeVos, who did not attend public school, seemed unfamiliar with testing standards or federal laws on educating people with disabilities. During her hearing, DeVos also said the federal government should let districts decide whether to allow guns in schools, for instance to protect from potential grizzlies.

I teach high school where I have the six-foot-tall football players who can overpower me. I dont want a gun in my classroom but she thinks bears are a concern, Everett-Kennedy said, adding that Blunts support for DeVos in spite of educators concerns is deeply insulting for the teachers in this state, especially considering he himself was a teacher.

Be informed. Get our free political newsletter featuring local and national updates and analysis.

See more here:
Blunt's Wikipedia page briefly changed to attack his support of DeVos as education secretary - STLtoday.com

Only 8.5pc of Wikipedia editors are women. How do we fix the … – YourStory.com

Women-related articles are generally shorter, more prone to deletion, and more likely to be peripheral pieces under male-centric articles.

I was beginning an introduction session at a college in Vijayawada. While my audience (mostly female students) was giggling, I wrote down a simple question on the whiteboard:

I see more men than women in _____

The response was some more shy giggling until some students slowly raised their hands. Sports! Technology companies! Conferences! In governments! When I am in my class. There is no denying that we all observe the underrepresentation of women at some points and occasions in our lives. However, it is much harder to imagine and notice that Wikipedia, the most used online encyclopaedia and the 7th most visited website worldwide, also poses a problematic imbalance in its content and editor demographics.

In 2011, a survey carried out by the Wikimedia Foundation found that only 8.5 percent of Wikipedia editors were female. Since then, the awareness has risen; many have found the editor demographic imbalance is a strong reflection of what the encyclopaedia does or does not cover, how the written language and discourse were constructed on the pages, and how discussion flows on article talk pages[1].

For example, scholars discovered that women-related articles are generally shorter, more prone to deletion, and more likely to be peripheral pieces under male-centric articles. To elaborate, in the network structure of Wikipedia articles, womens pages lack centrality as they often provide links and mention related male figures in their writing but not the other way around. A glass ceiling also exists for the notability criteria. The threshold for a woman to be notable enough (from the perspective of a male-dominant community) to deserve a Wikipedia page is higher than that of male figures. Thus, the lack of women editors and an already male-centric structure pose a threat not only to the diversity of content but also to the very definition of knowledge.

For years, the foundation and local communities have tried to discover the reasons behind the gender gap and solutions to it. Former Wikimedia Foundation Executive Director Sue Gardner posted on her blog nine reasons that are off-putting for women when they edit Wikipedia.

In India and other parts of the world, various reasons can also contribute to the problem. Awareness, for example, is the first barrier to betackled. Many women did not know that Wikipedia is editable or that there are Indian language versions that they can contribute to. Internet access and facilities are a couple more reasons. In case someone does not have a personal computer, a woman is usually more cautious and skeptical when using a public internet caf and staying out late. Similarly, families of young women editors can be more concerned about their daughters participation in men-organised/male-dominant communities, especially when there are offline (on-site) activities. The roots of the issue are not merely at the community level, but also sociopolitical and cultural.

Many events and initiatives have been carried out from local to global community levels. Women in Red (WiR), for example, is a global initiative to bring more women-related articles online. It encourages editors to turn red links (non-existing pages) into blue links (existing Wikipedia page). The project has helped increase female biographies from 15 percent (November 2014) of total biographies on English Wikipedia to 16.75 percent (November 2016)[2]. In March, Wikipedia communities around the globe also celebrate Womens History Month, when edit-a-thons (marathons for Wikipedia editing) are held to help create more womens articles online as well as to recruit more female volunteers and spread awareness. However, is this enough?

As we are raising more awareness, integrating gender gap issues into the communitys strategy plans and coming up with more intervention ideas to reach more potential women editors, it is time to revisit the meaning behind the work. In my early research time, I was to believe that retention rate (whether female participants will stay active after an event), number of articles created, and the event continuation potentials are the key factors in determining whether an event can be called successful. But the ideas have slowly changed as I have got to reach more female participants.

As a matter of fact, Wikipedia is about voluntary contribution and negotiating for consensus in quality knowledge creation as well as maintaining a friendly and open environment for all. In other words, we can nudge people into Wikipedia editing but we should not (and need not to) push them to do it. Especially in the situation of a wide gender gap, we should not make women feel like they are tokenised in the process that we are targeting them due to their gender and that they should contribute more because they are female, the minority. When asked about the existing problems in the current gender gap interventions, an active Wikipedian once explained to me:

Say if you are writing the biography of someone then you should be familiar with and interested in that persons work. Thats why sometimes those gender-specific edit workshops backfire... If you are creating a bio just because this person is a woman, then I think it is missing the whole point of Wikipedia.

In my opinion and through discussions with several female Wikipedians, I have realised that there should be a new debate and investigation on how intervention goals should be set and what these actions long-term results would be. While focusing on the retention rate of a new Wikipedian after an intervention, we limit ourselves in the frame of time and numbers. We should, instead, understand more about new members experiences and feedback to pinpoint the good motivations and expected barriers for them. With this information, we should help establish the motivation in event follow-ups and to minimise their barriers as much as the community can. Secondly, article quality should be stressed upon even if it takes more time to publish her/his first article, it is a much more fruitful learning experience to understand the responsibility of a Wikipedian. After all, low-quality articles not only do not contribute to Wikipedia content but also lead to more deletion, which can be a discouraging experience for those who are new.

For event continuation, we should guide the participants to community engagement and support them to carry out more event ideas that can suit their interests and goals. In short, it is about creating involvement, discussion, and a sense of community instead of continuously pushing events on our end and have the women be passive participants. When asked about how one can define a successful gender gap-bridging event, one of the active organisers told me:

For me, it is when conversations are happening. It is when we have both men and women, and that we can openly have a discussion about the issue and the difficulties and how we want to see changes.

To put it simply, I believe that we should look at experiences more than numbers, focus on quality more than quantity, and try to reach people (both men and women) to stimulate discussion more than being fixated on the contents needed to balance out the asymmetry.

How to fix the Wikipedia gender gap is never an easy question to ask, but what I am sure about is that Wikipedia and its communities should be empowering rather than result-oriented and that our learning still has a long way to go.

[1] A talk page is attached to each Wikipedia article (found on the top-left corner of an article), where editors can hold discussions and debates or leave comments during the editing process.

[2] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:WikiProject_Women_in_Red

Visit link:
Only 8.5pc of Wikipedia editors are women. How do we fix the ... - YourStory.com