Mediaboss Marketing

Updated 10:30 17 May 2024 GMT+1Published 10:31 17 May 2024 GMT+1

While Assassin's Creed Shadows was only announced two days ago, rogue elements of the Assassin's Creed fandom, and gaming as a whole, have been spotted vandalising the Wikipedia page for Yasuke, the real person who is serving as one of two main playable characters in the upcoming title.

As is visible by viewing previous versions of the Wikipedia article for the man, a new paragraph was added (before it was promptly deleted, the article itself locked so people can't edit it) that read:

"It is important to note that despite popular myth and modern depictions there are no historical writings nor evidence that Yasuke was ever granted the rank or title of samurai, he was never given a fief nor referred to as one in any writings. Most of our knowledge of his life comes from these messages written by missionaries and locals."

What is worth noting, as previously indicated, is that this paragraph simply did not exist on the page prior to the reveal of the upcoming Assassin's Creed game, and seems to have been added by gamers who have a problem for some reason with the character being so prominently displayed in the title.

It's also important to note that the changes to the Wikipedia page in question only came about after popular online agitator and former game developer Mark Kern tweeted about the game, claiming that developer Ubisoft changed the title in order to be more diverse. Kern later backtracked on this, however, stating that he's heard this was the plan all along, and Yasuke has been the protagonist of the game throughout development. Kern has not deleted his previous claim.

Topics:Ubisoft, Assassins Creed

Link:
Assassin's Creed Shadows 'critics' have started vandalising IRL protagonist Yasuke's Wiki page - GAMINGbible

The Wikipedia page for Yasuke has been the subject of an edit war afterAssassins Creed Shadows released their first look at Yasuke as one of the games protagonists.

Yasuke is a historical figure claimed to be the first black samurai. The Wikipedia page as it reads now, paints a more ambiguous picture as records of Yasuke appear to be few and far between (the article even says he waslikely of African origin). However the real excitement is happening in the Talk page for the article.

Users are currently having a back and forth about a particular line which clarifies Yasukes alleged status as a samurai rather than a retainer. The line currently reads.

It is important to note that despite popular myth and modern depictions there are no historical writings nor evidence that Yasuke was ever granted the rank or title of samurai, he was never given a fief nor referred to as one in any writings. Most of our knowledge of his life comes from these messages written by missionaries and locals.

The line comes with these two linked sources 1,2.

Users who disagree with this addition feel its racist backlash to Yasukes role inAssassins Creed Shadows meanwhile editors who support the addition claim its needed to prevent the spread of misinformation. Wikipedia editor Ezios Assassin explains:

I support the idea that Wikipedia needs to make it clear on the article that theres no evidence that Yasuke was granted the rank of samurai. Many random articles on the internet keep calling him a samurai (probably the effect of him being falsely portrayed as such in modern media). And now many people use those articles as a source to back their claim for political reasons. If that misinformation keeps spreading, it will become a fact eventually. If just one reliable source starts calling Yasuke a samurai, people will use that as a source to edit it on Wikipedia.

Meanwhile on more public forums of discourse, Twitter users are posting screenshots of Japanese users questioning the choice and pointing out the potential racism of a foreigner slaughtering Japanese in their country.

Assassins Creed Shadows is expected to release on November 15 for Xbox Series X/S, PlayStation 5, and PC.

Read the original post:
Assassin's Creed Shadows sparks Wikipedia edit war over Yasuke - Niche Gamer

What started as a series of lyrical jabs between the two hip hop moguls Drake and Kendrick Lamar soon escalated into a full-blown feud incorporating several diss tracks. Following constant subtle shots, the feud reignited with Lamars aggressive verses on his various tracks, including Like That and Euphoria, prompting a back-and-forth rap battle between the two.

And for the fans, who are eager to delve into the intricacies massive feud, Wikipedia has facilitated a homage with a page sharing the details and timeline of the rap battle. However, it seems that Wikipedia has gone a bit far in its attempt to capture the essence of the feud, formatting more akin to the chronicles of a war.

While Wikipedia might not always be the most trusted source of information, the renowned website has recently caught the attention of fans for a page chronicling the details and timeline of the rap battle between Drake and Kendrick Lamar.

The page goes into the intricate details surrounding their background and initial collaboration in the early 2010s and how it recently escalated into a much broader feud involving the two hip-hop heavyweights.

It also features several other celebrities who have been named or have supported either of the rappers in the conflict. One of the music stars who supported the 37-year-old singer-rapper included J.Cole. He released a song in April 2024 responding to Lamars Like That.

However, he issued a public apology and retracted his diss track, 7 Minute Drill, just two days after its release. This move marked his withdrawal from the ongoing feud between Drake and Lamar and is summarized on the Wikipedia page with the detail Until April 7, 2024.

Fans cant help but share some amusing responses to the details mentioned on the Wikipedia page, describing the ongoing feud as 1 month, 2 weeks and 1 day long and exchanging serious allegations against each other by employing the methods of diss tracks.

The depiction of Drake and Kendrick Lamars feud on Wikipedia has sparked humorous and amusing responses from fans, particularly how it states J. Coles involvement in the feud. Taking to X (Twitter), one user said, how the page made J. Cole look like he died in the war.

Many even demanded to see the 39-year-old rapper on both sides, considering his initial diss for Lamar and later apologizing for the same. Put J.Cole on both sides, one fan argued. Others found amusement in the detailed information provided on the page, including the specific duration of the feud being noted as 1 month, 2 weeks, 1 day long.

Another fan stated how Not even Jay Z n Nas got a Wiki page like this LMAOO this so crazy. Along with sharing their amusing reactions, fans have also expressed unwavering support for their favorite rapper in the ongoing feud.

The feud does not seem to be taking a break anytime soon, with Drake recently releasing another diss track, The Heart Pt. 6 in response to Lamars Meet the Grahams and Not Like Us, as he debunked the allegations about his daughter and shifted the focus on Lamars girlfriend, Whitney Alford.

Read the original post:
Made J. Cole look like he died in the war: Drake vs Kendrick Lamar Rap Battle Gets a World War 2 Styled Wikipedia ... - FandomWire

Did you miss the members of Mastodon playWikipedia: Fact or Fiction?

Don't fret. We've had a ton of rockers on the series over the years, so it can be hard to keep track of what episodes we have, especially if you're a recent reader and subscriber. So we've been making compilation episodes, organizing them either by artist or by genre, so that fans can see all of their favorites in one video.

GuitaristBill Kelliher and bassist Troy Sanders both participated in our video series at different points, so we combined clips from each of their episodes into one video, which you can check out below.

"What is this, is this someone's thought or opinion?" Sanders asked during the video. "It's written, so it must be true."

You'll hear about the basics, such as the members' upbringings, how they formed Mastodon and so on, but also some fun facts like how they ended up being invited to appear inGame of Thrones.

READ MORE:Guns N' Roses Play 'Wikipedia: Fact or Fiction?'

And if you're itching to see Mastodon live, they're set to head out with Lamb of God starting in July for a North American Ashes of the Leviathanrun with Kerry King and Malevolence. Check out all the dates on their website.

Loudwire's picks for the best rock and metal albums from 2000 to present.

Gallery Credit: by Loudwire Staff

Here is the original post:
Mastodon Play 'Wikipedia: Fact or Fiction?' - Loudwire

Toto Wolff has contacted Max Verstappen to explain his much-discussed Wikipedia statements. The Mercedes team boss stressed that his comment belongs in a certain context and that he does respect such records.

When Verstappen took his tenth Formula 1 victory in a row at the Italian Grand Prix, he broke the record, which until then was held by Sebastian Vettel. The Mercedes team boss caused a stir by stating that records did not interest him that much and that they were "only interesting for Wikipedia, which nobody reads anyway".

Wolff soon realised that he might not have been better off making that statement, as he was frequently asked about it two weeks later in Singapore. Even then, the 51-year-old Austrian acknowledged that he has made more intelligent statements before, but now he also reveals that he contacted the three-time world champion that same weekend.

Article continues under ad

"I sent Max a message to explain and he was OK with it," Wolff said in conversation with De Telegraaf. "If you don't know the context, it seems like I don't recognise such a great record. But the point was that Niki Lauda used to always laugh at records with us. He called it a relic of the past and always looked forward. That's the story behind it, but it wasn't the most intelligent thing I ever said."

Read more:
Wolff contacted Verstappen to explain Wikipedia statement - GPblog