Personal Time With Greg: Wikipedia #39;s Troubles
Help keep us going by donating or visiting our store! http://www.dawnsomewhere.com/store/ We also have a Patreon account: http://www.patreon.com/DawnSomewher...
By: FiMFlamFilosophy
Visit link:
Personal Time With Greg: Wikipedia's Troubles - Video
UNESCO World Heritage Sites in Serbia - Tentative List
Thanks for watching.... 1. Justiniana Prima : http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Justiniana_Prima 2. erdap national park : http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/%C4%90erdap_national_park 3. Stecak : http://en...
By: Planetedge
Read the original here:
UNESCO World Heritage Sites in Serbia - Tentative List - Video
It's hard to imagine a world without Wikipedia how else would we fall down the rabbit hole of celebrity relationships and somehow end up reading about the life cycle of the butterfly? Simple, straightforward, and seemingly infinite, it's easy to forget that Wikipedia's content is generated entirely by an army of volunteers. Anyone can edit Wikipedia's articles, which has led to a legion of middle school teachers berating students: "Don't believe everything you read on Wikipedia!"
But just because anyone canedit Wikipedia's articles doesn't mean everyone does. In response to a 2011 surveyrevealing thatless than 13 percent of Wikipedia contributors identify as female, New York City activists hosed the first Art+Feminism Edit-A-Thonlast February at Eyebeam Art and Technology Center. This campaign led to the creation of over 100 new pages about women in art.This weekend, Edit-A-Thons will take place all over the world (and online, of course) to correct, expand, and create articles for Wikipedia's much-neglected female artists.
In the East Bay, artist and UC Berkeley professor Jill Miller and student Anna Carey will co-host a publicEdit-A-Thon in the Berkeley Center for New Media Commonsthis Saturday, March 7, from 11 a.m. to 4 p.m, featuring training sessions throughout the day and refreshments. "Wikipedia is a reflection of our reality and our collective knowledge, and it's important that it be accurate," said Carey, who lamented that "you can Google more obscure [women] artists and there might just be one paragraph, whereas for a well-known artist or a male artist there will be entire sections."The California College of the Arts in Oakland will host their own Edit-A-Thon on the same day, from 2 to 6 p.m. No prior experience necessary just bring your laptop and get ready to change the world, one Wikipedia page at a time.
Read more:
East Bay Schools to Host Art and Feminism Wikipedia Edit-A-Thons
Working With Wikipedia
A brief tutorial on how to use and edit content on Wikipedia, the free online encyclopedia. Download the PDF from our website: http://mlmf.org/?attachment_id=225.
By: Michael LoVerme Memorial Foundation
Continued here:
Working With Wikipedia - Video
Wikipedia is an online encyclopedia and, as a means to that end, an online community of individuals interested in building and using a high-quality encyclopedia in a spirit of mutual respect. Therefore, there are certain things that Wikipedia is not.
Wikipedia is not a paper encyclopedia, but a digital encyclopedia project. Other than verifiability and the other points presented on this page, there is no practical limit to the number of topics Wikipedia can cover or the total amount of content. However, there is an important distinction between what can be done, and what should be done, which is covered in the Encyclopedic content section below. Consequently, this policy is not a free pass for inclusion: articles must abide by the appropriate content policies, particularly those covered in the five pillars.
Keeping articles to a reasonable size is important for Wikipedia's accessibility, especially for dial-up and mobile browser readers, since it directly affects page download time (see Wikipedia:Article size). Splitting long articles and leaving adequate summaries is a natural part of growth for a topic (see Wikipedia:Summary style). Some topics are covered by print encyclopedias only in short, static articles, but Wikipedia can include more information, provide more external links, and update more quickly.
Information should not be included in this encyclopedia solely because it is true or useful. An encyclopedia article should not be a complete exposition of all possible details, but a summary of accepted knowledge regarding its subject.[1] Verifiable and sourced statements should be treated with appropriate weight. Although there are debates about the encyclopedic merits of several classes of entries, consensus is that the following are good examples of what Wikipedia is not. The examples under each section are not intended to be exhaustive.
Wikipedia is not a dictionary, or a usage or jargon guide. Wikipedia articles are not:
Wikipedia is not a place to publish your own thoughts and analyses or to publish new information. Per our policy on original research, please do not use Wikipedia for any of the following:
Wikipedia is not a soapbox, a battleground, or a vehicle for propaganda, advertising and showcasing. This applies to usernames, articles, categories, files, talk page discussions, templates, and user pages. Therefore, content hosted in Wikipedia is not for:
Non-disruptive statements of opinion on internal Wikipedia policies and guidelines may be made on user pages and within the Wikipedia: namespace, as they are relevant to the current and future operation of the project. However, "[a]rticle talk pages should not be used by editors as platforms for their personal views on a subject." (see, Wikipedia:Talk page guidelines).
Wikipedia is neither a mirror nor a repository of links, images, or media files.[3] Wikipedia articles are not merely collections of:
Wikipedia is not a social networking service like Facebook or Twitter. You may not host your own website, blog, wiki, or cloud at Wikipedia. Wikipedia pages are not:
Go here to see the original:
Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not - Wikipedia, the free ...