Archive for the ‘Wikipedia’ Category

The Best Wikipedia Features Still In Beta

Wikipedia has quietly been working on a variety of features behind the scenes as part of its beta program. If youre feeling adventurous, heres how you can make researching on Wikipedia even better.

To use Wikipedias beta features, start by setting up an account with Wikipedia. Youll need to be logged in for the features to work (obviously). You can set up a new account here. Once youve made an account and logged in, head to the beta features page here. There are a range of features you can enable (anyone whos ever used Google Labs will feel at home); well highlight some of the best ones.

One of the most dangerous traps of the internet is the Wikipedia rabbit hole, where you endlessly click through related interesting links. Hover Cards makes it easier to sate your curiosity without opening a bunch of new tabs. When enabled, cards will appear when you hover over a link and display a summary of that page. If all you needed from that page was a quick primer or a picture, this saves you a click. Or twelve.

Wikipedia isnt the only Wiki around. You may have stumbled on projects like Wikiquote or Wikimedia Commons, but they tend to be fairly segregated. The other projects sidebar adds links to related content. So, for example, if youre reading up on William Shakespeare, it will provide you with a quick link to Wikiquotes collection of quotes from Shakespeares plays. Handy.

Wikipedias tweaks arent just user-facing. You can also enable HHVM (which stands for Hip Hop Virtual Machine), which claims to boost page loading times for large articles. Small articles and stubs probably wont be affected much, but larger pages like Ebola load much, much faster.

Wikipedia hasnt always had the best track record with search results. In fact, most of us would probably prefer to use Google. The company is clearly aware as the New Search project aims to fix the problem. Sometimes its just easier to click on the search box in Wikipedia itself if youre already there. If thats the case for you, enabling this beta feature should hopefully give you better results without substantially altering the interface itself.

Editing Wikipedia may not be for everyone, but if you contribute, youll appreciate some tweaks to the interface. The Visual Editor adds something that Wikipedia has sorely needed: a WYSIWIG editor. Now, you can type and see how the page will look immediately. There are also additional plugins for the video editor that you can add to make managing languages or formulas easier.

See the original post here:
The Best Wikipedia Features Still In Beta

Ne-Yo – Wikipedia: Fact Or Fiction – Part 1 – Video


Ne-Yo - Wikipedia: Fact Or Fiction - Part 1
If you #39;re new, Subscribe! http://bit.ly/subscribe-boombox Ne-Yo separates the fact from the fiction on his Wikipedia page in the latest episode. Go here http://theboombox.com/ Like...

By: The Boombox

Read the original:
Ne-Yo - Wikipedia: Fact Or Fiction - Part 1 - Video

Complemento: Wikipedia en Firefox [1080p HD] – Video


Complemento: Wikipedia en Firefox [1080p HD]
Extensin WiktionaryMultiLanguageDictionary para Firefox Add-on WiktionaryMultiLanguageDictionary for Firefox Al seleccionar una palabra te muestra una ventana o pop-up con la pgina de...

By: blinkiu76

See more here:
Complemento: Wikipedia en Firefox [1080p HD] - Video

Your Wikipedia searches can reveal national flu trends

Tuesday November 4, 2014 03:47 PM

The Associated Press

(c) 2014, The Washington Post.

The next time you look up flu symptoms on Wikipedia, you might be helping experts track the virus' spread. Researchers are reporting success in using Wikipedia traffic -- specifically the traffic on pages related to flu -- to predict the infection trends of a flu season.

The Centers for Disease Control and Protection isn't great at tracking flu trends. Its data, which comes from the reporting of healthcare providers around the country, is always about two weeks behind -- so the agency gets a great picture of the flu season once it's over, but can't see spikes in diagnoses in real-time.

And even when health officials look at the big picture, CDC data only includes flu patients who sought treatment, leaving out the many who suffered through the virus at home. Since the flu takes anywhere from 3,000 to 49,000 U.S. lives each year, catching the actual peaks of infection can make a big difference.

A year ago, the CDC launched a competition to find better flu models, especially those using social media and Internet data. This recent model, led by Kyle Hickman of the Los Alamos National Laboratories, uses an algorithm to link flu-related Wikipedia searches with CDC data from the same time.

Once the researchers taught their algorithm how searches and diagnoses were connected, the model was able to predict the 2013-2014 flu season in real time.

This isn't the first successful use of Wikipedia in flu-tracking. In April, a PLOS Computational Biology study (by a different group of researchers) boasted a Wikipedia-based model. It was more accurate than Google's popular flu trend monitoring, which uses Google searches to predict cases of the flu. Google is generally considered the best real-time alternative to CDC data, but its results can be skewed by media hype: When lots of people are Googling "swine flu" because they've heard it's a threat, they'll trick Google Flu Trends into recording a much higher spike in infection.

It's possible, the PLOS researchers suggested, that people are more likely to go to Wikipedia articles when they're concerned about symptoms they have -- while Google might just be the first place to go when you're looking for news about a possible pandemic.

Link:
Your Wikipedia searches can reveal national flu trends

How-To Add To An Existing Wikipedia Article – Video


How-To Add To An Existing Wikipedia Article

By: Online Research

Originally posted here:
How-To Add To An Existing Wikipedia Article - Video