Archive for the ‘Wikipedia’ Category

Envolver – Wikipedia

"Envolver"[A] is a song by Brazilian singer Anitta from her fifth studio album Versions of Me. It was released as the fourth single from the album through Warner Records on November 11, 2021.[1] A reggaeton and Latin pop song that hints to desiring a sexual relationship in a casual way, the lyrics incorporate several sexualinnuendos and double entendres. A remix of the song featuring American singer Justin Quiles was released on February 17, 2022.[3]

The song and its music video, self-directed by Anitta, went viral in March 2022, after it gained popularity on TikTok, where its "booty-grinding" dance became one of the most replicated. "Envolver" broke a string of records, including theSpotify record for most streamed song in a single-day in 2022 (7.278 million) at the time, biggest streaming day for a female Latin song, as well as the first song by a Brazilian artist and first solo Latin song to reach the top of the Spotify Global Daily chart.[4][5] Additionally it also became the first song ever to place inside the top 50 of all Latin countries on Spotify. It also broke the record for most one-day streams in Brazil with over 4.5 million plays, a record that was previously held by herself with "Vai Malandra" (2.1 million streams).[6]

Commercially, the song achieved international success, it reached number 70 on the Billboard Hot 100 chart issue dated April 16, 2022, becoming Anitta's highest career peak. She also had her highest entries on the Billboard Global 200 and Billboard Global Excl. U.S., at numbers two and one, respectively.[7] With the former, "Envolver" claimed the highest peak for a Latin female soloist; meanwhile, for the latter, Anitta became the first Latin female solo act to reach the top. The song topped charts in Brazil, where it was certified triple platinum, and number six on Billboard's Hot Latin Songs chart, and has charted in the Top 10 of Bolivia, Chile, Colombia, Ecuador, Dominican Republic, Honduras, Mexico, Paraguay, Panama, Peru, Portugal and Puerto Rico, and figured within the record charts of twenty others, including Argentina, Canada, El Salvador, Greece, Ireland, Luxembourg, Netherlands, Italy, Spain and Switzerland and top 80 in United States and France.

On November 8, 2021, Anitta released a teaser of the song through her social medias.[8] On the following days, the single cover art and a small snippet of the music video were also revealed.[9] The self-directed music video of "Envolver" was released along with the song on November 11st. It features Anitta dancing sensually with Moroccan dancer and model Ayoub Mutanda.[10]

A remix featuring American singer Justin Quiles was released on February 17, 2022.[3]

Read the original post:
Envolver - Wikipedia

Fast Radius – Wikipedia

Fast Radius, LLC was formed in 2014 by Rick Smith and Mitch Free, and in 2017, Fast Radius, LLC merged with Fast Radius, Inc.[6][7] Fast Radius, Inc. was co-founded by Lou Rassey, Pat McCusker, Bill King, and John Nanry in a partnership with the shipping and logistics company UPS in an effort to leverage additive manufacturing as a supply chain solution.[8] Since its founding, the company has grown to more than 240 full-time employees and has expanded from supply chain solutions[buzzword] to all manner of parts manufacturing.[3][9]

Currently, Fast Radius specializes in manufacturing industrial-grade metal and plastic parts for applications including consumer goods, medical devices, automotive, aerospace, industrial equipment, and electronics, along with product development and design services.

Its Chicago headquarters, which has been in operation since 2018, is home to the largest public install base of Carbon DLS 3D printers in North America.[3] It was named a Lighthouse Factory, a distinction honoring the best digital factories in the world, by the World Economic Forum.[10]

In addition, Fast Radius has a large footprint of HP Multi Jet Fusion (MJF) equipment, Formlabs Stereolithography (SLA) printers, and the Desktop Metal Studio System.[11] Fast Radius also has a robust presence of Stratasys FDM printers co-located at the UPS World Port facility in Louisville, Kentucky.[12][13] The company is technology-agnostic, and works with a global network of manufacturers to provide CNC machining, injection molding, and urethane casting services.

Notable customers include Satair (an Airbus Services Company), Curtiss Motorcycles, Axial3D, Bastian Solutions (a Toyota Advanced Logistics Company), Rawlings, Yanfeng, Aptiv,[14][15] Danfoss, and Steelcase.[16][17][18][19]

In 2019, Fast Radius raised $48 million in a Series B funding round led by UPS and assisted by Drive Capital.[5][9]

During the COVID-19 pandemic, Fast Radius designed a 3D-printed respirator mask in response to the nationwide PPE shortage. The company released the design files and instructions online as an open-source resource. Fast Radius also produced face shield kits for frontline healthcare workers. They also worked with the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign to design and patent a microfluidics chip for a point-of-care COVID-19 testing solution.[buzzword][1][20][21]

In 2022, the company became listed on Nasdaq through a merger with ECP Environmental Growth Opportunities Corp.[22]

Read more:
Fast Radius - Wikipedia

Wikipedia gets it wrong again, and there is nothing Vivek Agnihotri can do about it – Opinion News , Firstpost – Firstpost

As per Wikipedia, Vivek Ranjan Agnihotri's The Kashmir Files is a fictional storyline that is centered around an exodus of Kashmiri Hindus.

If Wikipedia is to be believed and its sickening and frightening how this self-help quick fix cocky rack of righteous knowledge is taken as the gospel truth by billions across the worldthen The Kashmir Files, the film that has drastically revised decades-old mindsets on the savage slaying of Kashmiri Pandits in the 1990s, is nothing but a flickering fiction, a pack of lies, a web of deceit.

We could turn around and say the same about Wikipedias dubious authenticity, its arrogant show of I-know-best knowledge for a civilization looking for instant knowledge. Wikipedia is Karma Cola with more fizz than substance. What comes out of customized encyclopedic sources need not always be true. In fact, the number of times Ive caught Wikipedia on the foot would make for an interesting encyclopaedia.

Its comments on The Kashmir Files rake up the ache and take the cake. According to Wiki Darling, and I quote, The film presents a fictional storyline centered around an exodus of Kashmiri Hindus in the disputed region of Kashmir. It depicts the early 1990s exodus.to be a genocide,. a notion that is considered to be widely inaccurate.

Wiki Darling then goes on to concede grudgingly that The Kashmir Files is a commercial success, seemingly benefitting from promotion by India's ruling Hindu nationalist Bharatiya Janata Party. but the storyline attracting criticism for attempting to recast established history and propagating Islamophobia.

Now, let us pause Wise Wikis welter of quick wisdom and ask them: where did you get these facts on The Kashmir Files from? Certainly not from any source that knows anything about the film business. The 340-odd crores that the film has earned worldwide couldnt possibly be manipulated by any governmental machinery. At the most, the BJP run states can encourage potential moviegoers to see the film by providing free tickets. Even that is a long shot. Prime Minister Modi and his close allies have better things to do than to promote a film which they may feel to be beneficial to them in the next elections.

And even if we presume that the ruling government is soft on The Kashmir Files, how do we explain its success in non-BJP states? How do we account for its phenomenal reach across the world? Simultaneously opening up wounds of and debates on a race that nearly got wiped by bestial acts of terrorism? How do we explain to Indians who hadnt been inside a movie theatre for 40-50 braving Covid and inflation to see The Kashmir Files in movie theatres?

When Wikipedia makes irresponsible comments it shows an arrogant misuse of the power that it has over impressionable minds across the globe. When Wiki declares, Across the country, BJP legislators have bought out screens for audiences to watch the movie for free it shows a blatant disregard for basic common sense: you can buy shows in theatres, but you cant buy the audience and force it to watch the film.

But then Wikipedia prides itself on being what they feel to be the definition of truly democratic. To them, this means that any Ram Rahim or Richard can go and edit the facts on the page as per his political leanings.

Today it is The Kashmir Files. Tomorrow it may be Nehrus Discovery Of India or that book which Mr Ambedkar wrote, that Wikipedia declares to be drama.

Welcome to the era of mutating history and gamely facts.

Subhash K Jha is a Patna-based film critic who has been writing about Bollywood for long enough to know the industry inside out. He tweets at @SubhashK_Jha.

Read all theLatest News,Trending News,Cricket News,Bollywood News,India NewsandEntertainment Newshere. Follow us onFacebook,TwitterandInstagram.

Read this article:
Wikipedia gets it wrong again, and there is nothing Vivek Agnihotri can do about it - Opinion News , Firstpost - Firstpost

PIL in SC seeking removal of defamatory references on Ayurveda from Wikipedia – ThePrint

New Delhi [India], May 5 (ANI): A Public Interest Litigation (PIL) has been filed in the Supreme Court to direct the Respondent the Ministry of Ayush and the Ministry of IT and Electronics to take necessary steps that compel Wikimedia Foundation to remove references from the articles regarding Ayurveda published on its website.

The PIL further sought direction to the respondent Ministry of Ayush to consider the representation dated October 2, 2021, sent by the petitioners.

The petitioner, Ayurvedic Medicine Manufacturers Organisation of India (AMMOI), is an association registered under the Travancore-Cochin Literary, Scientific and Charitable Societies Act, 1955 was established to find remedies to the common problems of manufacturers of Ayurvedic medicines. The Association was registered at Trichur, Kerala.

The petitioner organization, through its petition moved by advocates Shweta Garg, Robin Raju, Deepa Joseph and Blessan Mathews, has highlighted an article that is published about Ayurveda on Wikipedia as maligning, defamatory and biased.

The contents of the matter shown on Wikipedia totally malign the natural system of

medicine which has a history of more than 3,000 years and is widely respected and accepted the world over, the petitioner said, pointing out the fact that the incumbent Government of India has also constituted a separate Ministry named AYUSH for Ayurveda and other alternative medicine systems.

The petition further stated that the Constitution of a separate ministry is an acknowledgment of this ancient stream of medicine, the petition said.

The petition said that the matter of concern for the petitioner is that the second line of the article published on Wikipedia, which is hosted by the Respondent Wikimedia Foundation, terms Ayurveda as a pseudoscientific, and needlessly at the start of the article cites the statement of Indian Medial Association that describes Ayurvedic practitioners as Quacks. The referred article has unnecessarily and purely with the intent to tarnish Ayurveda, the plea said.

That the matter of concern is that this utterly absurd, poorly researched and prejudiced article pops up as the first article when Ayurveda is searched on Google, The petition said.

This article also affects the morale of the thousands of Ayurvedic practitioners in India and the World over. The article published does more harm to a natural system of medicine which has legacy and acceptance for thousands of years, the petition said.

It reiterated that the contents of the article do harm to the hard-earned reputation of Ayurveda, built through sheer dedication and constant research over a substantial span of time.

The said articles clearly overlook the fact that there are numerous Ayurvedic Medical colleges in the country where Millions have been invested and innumerable people visit for treatment, the petition said. (ANI)

This report is auto-generated from ANI news service. ThePrint holds no responsibility for its content.

View post:
PIL in SC seeking removal of defamatory references on Ayurveda from Wikipedia - ThePrint

Tories and Labour accused of covering up Better Together coalition in Wikipedia edit – The National

THE Tories and Labour have been accused of attempting to hide their coalition on West Lothian Council days before the local election after an anonymous user removed their partnership from the local authoritys Wikipedia page.

The edit was picked up by Livingston South Green candidate Cameron Glasgow who noticed the Conservative part of the coalition formed in 2017 had been removed from a table showing the councils electoral history, leaving it to just say Scottish Labour Party.

An anonymous user thought to be from the Edinburgh area according to the IP address had made the change just before 10pm on Sunday.

Glasgow said on social media the low move showed the Tories wanted to hide the fact they chose to team up with Labour to form an administration in 2017 just before voters go to the polls on Thursday.

While sharing a screenshot of the edit, he tweeted: I know the @ScotTories dont like to acknowledge the agreement with @ScottishLabour in West Lothian Council, but editing Wikipedia at night to hide the fact is a low move.

The electoral history table was edited to look like this

In a panel down the right-hand side of the Wikipedia page, it still says only Labour form the administration and the Conservatives are under other parties.

Once Glasgow spotted the edit, he swiftly corrected it to make sure residents were clear on the facts before heading to the ballot box.

The edit history shows the change was made on Sunday night

Anyone can edit Wikipedia pages at any time.

Glasgow added: Labour and the Conservatives have been in an alliance in West Lothian for around 10 years, although both are very keen to deny this.

The joint administration have continually used the constitutional debate to block any opposition.

Both Labour and the Tories have distanced themselves from each other in West Lothian but trying to rewrite history like this is shocking.

READ MORE:New Labour grandees in London Wetherspoons bash for '97 anniversary

I'm glad I managed to catch this and change it back as it's important that people know the facts that voting Labour in West Lothian is a vote for the Conservatives.

Greens will never go into any kind of agreement with the Tories. Our focus is on building a fairer, greener future and securing the first Green councillors in West Lothian.

Although his tweet only accuses the Tories of making the edit, Glasgowtold the National he felt it could've been either group attempting to cover up the alliance.

READ MORE:BBC refuses to say why it hasn't covered Tory peer Michelle Mone's London house raid

The Tories have since hit back and said a conspiracy theory has been conjured up and they are completely unaware of any activity on the Wikipedia page.

A Scottish Conservative spokesperson said: We've not got the slightest idea what's happened on the West Lothian Wikipedia page and we won't be looking into any conspiracy theories on that front either.

There's an important election on Thursday and we're going to focus on that."

Scottish Labour have refused to comment.

Here is the original post:
Tories and Labour accused of covering up Better Together coalition in Wikipedia edit - The National