Archive for the ‘Wikipedia’ Category

How volunteers created Wikipedia’s world-beating Covid-19 coverage – The Spinoff

Wikipedias coverage of the Covid-19 pandemic has outdone most media companies in both content output and page views. Josie Adams spoke to Wikipedian Mike Dickison about what makes the organisation so good at covering these events.

There are more than 5,200 articles about Covid-19 on Wikipedia. One defines the disease, and another the virus that causes it. Articles describe the viruss impact on everything from disc golf to human rights. Timelines abound; you can follow Covid-19s progress day by day, or country by country.

In New Zealand, there are pages for the Marist College and Ruby Princess clusters, for the contact tracing app and, of course, for Dr Ashley Bloomfield. The Covid-19 pandemic in New Zealand page, created in March under a different name, has been visited more than a million times. The detail in it is both comprehensive and precise: it contains statistics from clusters and cases, definitions of essential services and alert levels, and more Covid-19-adjacent information about things like the George Floyd protests, church services and the pig surplus.

Mike Dickison is one of thousands of volunteers working on these pages. He said that while New Zealands Covid-19 numbers are important, the colour surrounding our experience of the pandemic is also worth preserving.

When lockdown first happened, I put out a call to encourage people to try and record the temperature of the time, he said. Signs, teddy bears in the windows, empty streets, that sort of thing. I was trying really hard to capture some of that ephemeral stuff that was happening publicly, because I knew that as soon as we got out of lockdown wed just throw that all away and try to return to normal.

Dickison, who has his own Wikipedia page, was New Zealands first Wikipedian-at-large. Funding from the Wikimedia foundation allowed him to take up residency in scientific institutions and universities spreading the word of the good e-book. Hes a museum curator and zoologist; an academic by (and about) nature.

Mike Dickison at Wellingtons BioBlitz in 2019. (Photo: Wikipedia)

Although not all volunteers working on the Covid-19 Wikipedia edits are medical experts, Dickison said they do have an understanding of what makes good information.

Anyone can edit an article, but its important to note that articles on medical topics have especially stringent conditions on their edits, he said. Its very hard to sneak any kind of vandalism or false information in there, because there are edits happening every minute or two.

Edits made by someone whos a first-timer or anonymous will automatically generate a red flag in the software, alerting what Wikipedians call vandalism patrols to come and double-check the edit as soon as possible. The Covid-19 pandemic in New Zealand page is one referred to as semi-protected, meaning users must meet a threshold of edits before being allowed to edit it.

Dickison said what makes for a good source is defined in crushing detail. What youre looking for in a reliable source is ideally a peer-reviewed publication thats been through an editorial process, and preferably a proofreading and fact-checking process as well, he said. Newspapers, scientific journals, and sometimes radio are the main sources youll see at the end of an article. Even then, some newspapers are flagged as unreliable, including papers like The Sun. Some of the British tabloids, those references are routinely deleted, he said. That doesnt meet our standards.

The Covid-19 pages are checked for error more than most Wikipedia articles due to the massive number of views they get; there are more than 424 million page views between them so far.

Dickison feels the free encyclopedia is well-placed to handle news coverage of events like the Covid-19 pandemic because of its large army of responsive volunteers. In many ways, Wikipedia handles this kind of breaking news coverage better than the media, because its a synthesis of different media outlets, he said. The Wikipedians will be ruthless in trying to find corroborating sources and suppress anything that looks like it might not be well-founded.

Its got an immune system against falsehood, so its actually quite resilient to hoaxing and fake news and bad information.

Toby Morris and Siouxsie Wiles collaborations have been translated (here into Turkish) and uploaded to Wikimedia Commons for anyone to use. (Image: Wikipedia)

The problem with information in the time of a pandemic is that normally reliable sources begin to show cracks. A study published in The Lancet that claimed the antimalarial drug hydroxychloroquine could actually be harmful to Covid-19 patients was retracted due to several anomalies in the data, but not before its publication put a halt to drug trials around the world.

There are lots of studies coming out very fast, and not all of them seem to be reputable, said Dickison. So [volunteers] tend to use review papers or any kind of publication that does meta-analysis of a whole bunch of other studies. Those are considered better than hot-off-the-press brand new studies.

Governments, too, can have their data questioned. On the Wikipedia page for Covid-19 in the United States, the statistics section comes with a caveat that multiple sources note that statistics on confirmed coronavirus cases are misleading, since the shortage of tests means the actual number of cases is much higher than the number of cases confirmed. The sources, of course, are provided. There are over 550 sources listed on this one page, many of them corroborating others.

The speed and the size of some of those articles is just amazing, said Dickison. Its really a pretty incredible piece of work.

According to the Wikimedia foundation, 67,554 editors have worked on the Covid-19 pages in 175 different languages. The Covid-19 pandemic in New Zealand page has more than 1,800 edits made to it by 219 editors. This information is all free and easy to access.

Considering the manpower and rigour behind Wikipedias coverage of Covid-19, it can be frustrating for editors like Dickison to hear people repeat decade-old warnings about the website: anyone can edit it, so its not a reliable source.

They might be a little bit out of date, said Dickison. But if you do a comparison between Wikipedia and most other published, referenced sources, youll find that it stacks up pretty well, particularly in the areas of science, medicine, computer technology and history.

Most people use Wikipedia almost every day, and I would say youd want to know where that information is coming from and how much you can trust it, wouldnt you?

The Spinoff Daily gets you all the day's best reading in one handy package, fresh to your inbox Monday-Friday at 5pm.

Read the original post:
How volunteers created Wikipedia's world-beating Covid-19 coverage - The Spinoff

Will observe Mangal Pandey”s birth anniversary on Jan 30 from next year: UP minister – Outlook India

Ballia (UP), Jul 21 (PTI) Uttar Pradesh minister Anand Swaroop Shukla on Tuesday said the birth anniversary of freedom fighter Mangal Pandey will be observed on January 30 from next year while pitching for a correction in the date on popular website Wikipedia.

The minister claimed that the website has wrongly mentioned the birth date of Magal Pandey, who played a role in the 1857 rebellion against the British, as July 19,1827.

This creates a lot of problems in observing his birth anniversary, the minister said, adding that the freedom fighters actual date of birth is January 30, 1831.

Documents in this regard have been collected from his family here and the state chief minister will be apprised of it on Wednesday after which a letter on behalf of his relatives and relevant papers will be sent to the Wikipedia, Shukla said.

From the next year onwards, the birth anniversary of Mangal Pandey will be observed on January 30, he added.

The president of Shaheed Mangal Pandey Vichar Manch, Krishnakant Pathak, said Basic Shiksha Parishad books also state January 30, 1831 as the date of birth and Nagwa village as the freedom fighter''s native place. PTI CORR SAB RDKRDK

Disclaimer :- This story has not been edited by Outlook staff and is auto-generated from news agency feeds. Source: PTI

See the original post here:
Will observe Mangal Pandey''s birth anniversary on Jan 30 from next year: UP minister - Outlook India

Army ban on war crime comments during Twitch stream may have violated First Amendment, lawyers say – Alton Telegraph

Sgt. David Blose competes online in "Rainbow Six Siege" as a representative of the Army Esports Team at the USA Skills Conference in Louisville, Ky., on June 25, 2019.

Sgt. David Blose competes online in "Rainbow Six Siege" as a representative of the Army Esports Team at the USA Skills Conference in Louisville, Ky., on June 25, 2019.

Photo: U.S. Army Photo By Devon Suits

Sgt. David Blose competes online in "Rainbow Six Siege" as a representative of the Army Esports Team at the USA Skills Conference in Louisville, Ky., on June 25, 2019.

Sgt. David Blose competes online in "Rainbow Six Siege" as a representative of the Army Esports Team at the USA Skills Conference in Louisville, Ky., on June 25, 2019.

Army ban on war crime comments during Twitch stream may have violated First Amendment, lawyers say

The Army's official video gaming team is battling criticism of its online conduct, traced back to a single emoji-laden tweet.

The military, recognizing the enormous appeal of video game streaming, has a team that plays popular games such as "Call of Duty" and "Valorant" to showcase a slice of Army life and to reach potential recruits.

But trolls and activists have bombarded the Army's esports team's chat channel and Twitch streams with references to wartime atrocities committed by the United States. About 300 of those Twitch users have been barred, the Army said.

Legal experts say the bans are unconstitutional.

"The government can't try to engineer the conversation of the public by saying only people who agree with us can respond," said Katie Fallow, a senior staff attorney at Columbia University's Knight First Amendment Institute. "The First Amendment means the government can't kick someone out or preclude them based on their viewpoint."

The issue has strained the Army's efforts to rely more on digital recruiting through venues such as Twitch, where their prime targets for candidates - mostly young men and boys - hang out in droves. Twitch can get their streams in front of 80% of U.S. teenage males, the company has said, and users watched 5 billion hours of streaming content in the second quarter of 2020.

By comparison, Netflix users streamed 6.1 billion hours in April. (Twitch is owned by Amazon, whose chief executive, Jeff Bezos, owns The Washington Post.)

The Army can trace the beginning of the controversy to its own public awareness efforts and viral tweets. On June 1, the Army esports team responded to the chat app Discord on Twitter with heart emoji and uWu, an emoticon used to express happiness or defiance.

It was retweeted more than 20,000 times, perhaps by some perplexed that the military was dipping so far into Internet culture and others angry about the recruiting strategy. By that evening, users went on a speedrun to see how fast they could get barred from the Army's channel, with some posting Wikipedia links to U.S. wartime atrocities.

The bans on Twitch, in real time with commentary from soldiers, was spotlighted by activists and the streaming community. Jordan Uhl, a political consultant and activist, jumped on the stream on July 8, when Joshua "Strotnium" David, a Green Beret on the Army esports team, was streaming a round of the battle royale game "Call of Duty: Warzone."

"whats your favorite u.s. war crime?" Uhl asked. The filter blocked the phrase.

"what's your favorite u.s. w4r cr1me?" Uhl wrote, before posting Wikipedia's war crime entry.

"You little Internet keyboard monsters," David said. "I won't stand for that. I'm bigger than you." Uhl was kicked off seconds later.

"Have a nice time getting banned, my dude," David said on the stream.

Uhl told Vice News that he was frustrated by the ban and the recruiting effort. "Kids have at least a right to know what the military does and has done," he said. His similar efforts on the Navy's Twitch stream earned a ban there, too, he said on Twitter.

The Army defended the bans, saying the comments fell in line with harassment, which is forbidden by Twitch terms of service, said Lisa Ferguson, an Army spokeswoman. Many of the accounts used were newly created, pointing to an effort to throw the channel into turmoil and not discuss relevant topics, Ferguson said.

"The Army eSports Team does not regulate viewpoints of participants on its social media forums," Ferguson said. "The Army may reasonably regulate the time, place and manner of discussions on its recruiting social media sites. Army eSports social media sites are nonpolitical forums for sharing information about joining the Army."

The team has stopped streaming while it reviews "internal policies and procedures, as well as all platform-specific policies," Ferguson said.

Vera Eidelman, a staff attorney at the American Civil Liberties Union, focused on speech and technology, said the Army's defense is eroded by the relevance of the topic and the openness of the public forum. A private host would face fewer constraints, she said, but in this case, the host is the government.

"Clearly at issue is that they didn't like the viewpoint and questions," she said. "That is precisely what the Constitution prohibits."

Eidelman and Fallow pointed to relevant court rulings as examples. The Knight First Amendment Institute argued in court that President Donald Trump could not block individual users on Twitter because it was a government-led banishment on a public forum. Appeals courts upheld the ruling.

A main thrust of the government's defense was that social media is an avenue for the president to speak, said Fallow, one of the attorneys who represented blocked users. But the institute said the tweets occur on an inherently active medium where dialogue takes place.

"This is even clearer," Fallow said of the Army ban, because the conversations unfolded in real time in full public view.

The incident teased out another issue that landed the Army in hot water over its merchandise giveaway that appeared to be little more than a fish for recruitment leads.

Uhl had noticed a link put out by the Army that advertised a contest for a free and pricey controller. A link led to a recruiting page with no specifics about the contest, Uhl wrote in The Nation.

"Once we became aware of the issues, we requested immediate removal," a Twitch spokesperson said.

The Army acknowledged that the content was pulled down due to lack of transparency. "The team is exploring options to use platforms for giveaways that will provide more external clarity," the Army said.

Continue reading here:
Army ban on war crime comments during Twitch stream may have violated First Amendment, lawyers say - Alton Telegraph

Andrea Orcel and the importance of having a positive Wikipedia page – eFinancialCareers

If you're a senior banker, how important is it that you have a glowing Wikipedia entry? Many in the industry may not have given it much thought. However,someone claiming to be acting on behalf of Andrea Orcel has been taking an interest in his own particulary entry.

For anyone who hasn't visited it, Orcel's Wikipedia pageis a work of art. Running to nearly 4,000 words it details everything you could want to know about a banker who it says has, "consolidated an enduring legacyof being one of the most successful investment bankers of his generation." Alongside a description of theSantander saga, there are words on Orcel's time atUBS, a detailed dealmaking list and a section entitled 'Public Image and Legacy.'

Orcel's lengthy entry might simply be because he is "widely known"as the "Ronaldoof investment banking" (in the words of his page).

However, it couldalso be because people acting in Orcel's interest have been contributing.According to the revision history for Orcel's page, a Wikipedia editor 'MAaR11Aa 2019' restructured the 'profile' in April 2020to "make it simpler and more organized." The editor claims thathe or shemade the changes, "at the request of Mr Orcel." The same editor has made around 26 other amendmentssince February 2019. It's not clear that the changes were genuinelymade at the request of Orcel or not.

Some of the most recent changes include: replacing the word 'controversial' with 'leading' in the sentence, 'Orcel is a controversial figure in European business and international banking;' removing a sentence that said Orcel had been criticized for an abrasive management style, overworking subordinates and being hyper-competitive;and removing a claim that Orcel received $12m in advisory fees for the RBS-ABN AMRO deal of 2007, plus the fact that the deal was subsequently dubbed "disastrous" by the Daily Telegraph. The pages created byMAaR11Aa 2019in April arevisible hereand here.

It's not clear whoMAaR11Aa 2019is. The editor may have nothing to do with Orcel, despite claiming to act on his behalf.Many of the changes made in late April weresubsequentlyreversed by other Wikipedia users and proved onlytransitory. If you're a senior banker interested in managing your public profile, this might seem a bit of a shame. It will be interesting to see whether further edits follow.

Have a confidential story, tip, or comment youd like to share? Contact: sbutcher@efinancialcareers.com in the first instance. Whatsapp/Signal/Telegram also available. Bear with us if you leave a comment at the bottom of this article: all our comments are moderated by human beings. Sometimes these humans might be asleep, or away from their desks, so it may take a while for your comment to appear. Eventually it will unless its offensive or libelous (in which case it wont.)

Photo by Muhamad Reza Junianto on Unsplash

Go here to read the rest:
Andrea Orcel and the importance of having a positive Wikipedia page - eFinancialCareers

Meet Wikipedias Ayn Rand-loving founder and Wikimedia Foundations regime-change operative CEO – The Grayzone

This is part 2 in a series of investigative reports on the systemic problems with Wikipedia. Read part 1 here: Wikipedia formally censors The Grayzone as regime-change advocates monopolize editing

Internet encyclopedia giant Wikipedia has listed The Grayzone as a deprecated source, censoring the independent organization, alongside several other news websites, on an official blacklist of taboo media outlets.

The blacklisting is the result of a long-running campaign run by a coterie of regime-change activists who have effectively hijacked Wikipedia, scrubbing the site of information that runs counter to their sectarian agenda and editing their political adversaries out of existence.

At no point has this cabal of editors pointed to a pattern of errors or fabrications by The Grayzone. Instead, they have argued for its blacklisting on the grounds of the political views of its writers, a wholesale violation of Wikipedia guidelines that demand neutrality in editing.

As detailed in part one of this series, Wikipedia founders and the Wikimedia Foundation have done nothing to address the fundamental corruption of the internet encyclopedia they oversee by a gang of hyper-partisan censors.

That might be because the founder of Wikipedia, Jimmy Wales, and the executive director of the Wikimedia Foundation, veteran US regime-change operative Katherine Maher, share the interventionist and corporate agenda that disproportionately powerful, neoconservative-oriented editors advance under their watch.

Born from seemingly humble beginnings, the Wikimedia Foundation is today swimming in cash and invested in many of the powerful interests that benefit from its lax editorial policy.

The foundations largest donors include corporate tech giants Google, Microsoft, Apple, and Craigslist. With more than $145 million in assets in 2018, nearly $105 million in annual revenue, and a massive headquarters in San Francisco, Wikimedia has carved out a space for itself next to these Big Tech oligarchs in the Silicon Valley bubble.

It is also impossible to separate Wikipedia as a project from the ideology of its creator. When he co-founded the platform in 2001, Jimmy Jimbo Wales was a conservative libertarian and devoted disciple of right-wing fanatic Ayn Rand.

A former futures and options trader, Wales openly preached the gospel of Objectivism, Rands ultra-capitalist ideology that sees government and society itself as the root of all evil, heralding individual capitalists as gods.

Wales described his philosophy behind Wikipedia in specifically Randian terms. In a video clip from a 2008 interview, published by the Atlas Society, an organization dedicated to evangelizing on behalf of Objectivism, Wales explained that he was influenced by Howard Roark, the protagonist of Rands novel The Fountainhead.

Wikipedias structure was expressly meant to reflect the ideology of its libertarian tech entrepreneur founder, and Wales openly said as much.

At the same time, however, Wikipedia editors have upheld the diehard Objectivist Jimmy Wales, as the New York Times put it in 2008, as a benevolent dictator, constitutional monarch, digital evangelist and spiritual leader.

Wales has always balanced his libertarian inclinations with old-fashioned American patriotism. He was summoned before the US Senate Committee on Homeland Security and Government Operations in 2007 to further explain how Wikipedia and its related technologies could be of service to Uncle Sam.

Wales began his remarks stating, I am grateful to be here today to testify about the potential for the Wikipedia model of collaboration and information sharing which may be helpful to government operations and homeland security.

At a time when the United States has been increasingly criticized around the world, I believe that Wikipedia is an incredible carrier of traditional American values of generosity, hard work, and freedom of speech, Wales continued, implicitly referencing the George Bush administrations military occupation of Iraq.

The Wikipedia founder added, The US government has always been premised on responsiveness to citizens, and I think we all believe good government comes from broad, open public dialogue. I therefore also recommend that US agencies consider the use of wikis for public facing projects to gather information from citizens and to seek new ways of effectively collaborating with the public to generate solutions to the problem that citizens face.

In 2012, Wales married Kate Garvey, the former diary secretary of ex-British Prime Minister Tony Blair. Their wedding, according to the conservative UK Telegraph, was witnessed by guests from the world of politics and celebrity.

Wales status-quo-friendly politics have only grown more pronounced over the years. In 2018, for instance, he publicly cheered on Israels bombing of the besieged Gaza strip and portrayed Britains leftist former Labour Party leader Jeremy Corbyn as an anti-Semite.

Jimmy Wales and the Wikimedia Foundation claim to have little power over the encyclopedia itself, but it is widely known that this is just PR. Wikimedia blew the lid off this myth in 2015 when it removed a community-elected member of its board of trustees, without explanation.

At the time of this scandal, the Wikimedia Foundations board of trustees included a former corporate executive at Google, Arnnon Geshuri, who was heavily scrutinized for shady hiring practices. Geshuri, who also worked at billionaire Elon Musks company Tesla, was eventually pressured to step down from the board.

But just a year later, Wikimedia appointed another corporate executive to its board of trustees, Gizmodo Media Group CEO Raju Narisetti.

The figure that deserves the most scrutiny at the Wikimedia Foundation, however, is its executive director Katherine Maher, who is closely linked to the US regime-change network.

Maher boasts an eyebrow-raising rsum that would impress the most ardent of cold warriors in Washington.

With a degree in Middle Eastern and Islamic Studies from New York University, Maher studied Arabic in Egypt and Syria, just a few years before the so-called Arab Spring uprising and subsequent Western proxy war to overthrow the Syrian government.

Maher then interned at the bank Goldman Sachs, as well as the Council on Foreign Relations and Eurasia Group, both elite foreign-policy institutions that are deeply embedded in the Western regime-change machine.

At the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR), Maher says on her public LinkedIn profile that she worked in the US/Middle East Program, oversaw the CFR Corporate Program, and Identified appropriate potential clients, conducted outreach.

At the Eurasia Group, Maher focused on Syria and Lebanon. According to her bio, she Developed stability forecasting and scenario modeling, and market and political stability reports.

Maher moved on to a job at Londons HSBC bank which would go on to pay a whopping $1.9 billion fine after it was caught red-handed laundering money for drug traffickers and Saudi financiers of international jihadism. Her work at HSBC brought her to the UK, Germany, and Canada.

Next, Maher co-founded a little-known election monitoring project focused on Lebanons 2008 elections called Sharek961. To create this platform, Maher and her associates partnered with an influential technology non-profit organization, Meedan, which has received millions of dollars of funding from Western foundations, large corporations like IBM, and the permanent monarchy of Qatar.

Meedan also finances the regime-change lobbying website, Bellingcat, which is considering a reliable source on Wikipedia, while journalism outlets like The Grayzone are formally blacklisted.

Sharek961 was funded by the Technology for Transparency Network, a platform for regime-change operations bankrolled by billionaire Pierre Omidyars Omidyar Network and billionaire George Soros Open Society Foundations.

Maher subsequently moved over to a position as an innovation and communication officer at the United Nations Childrens Fund, UNICEF. There, she oversaw projects funded by the US Agency for International Development (USAID), an arm of the US State Department which finances regime-change operations and covert activities around the globe under the auspices of humanitarian goodwill.

Soon enough, Maher cut out the middleman and went to work as a program officer in information and communications technology at the National Democratic Institute (NDI), which was created and financed directly by the US government. The NDI is a central gear in the regime-change machine; it bankrolls coup and destabilization efforts across the planet in the guise of democracy promotion.

At the NDI, Maher served as a program officer for internet freedom projects, advancing Washingtons imperial soft power behind the front of boosting global internet access pursuing a strategy not unlike the one used to destabilize Cuba.

The Wikimedia Foundation CEO says on her LinkedIn profile that her work at the NDI included democracy and human rights support as well as designing technology programs for citizen engagement, open government, independent media, and civil society for transitional, conflict, and authoritarian countries, including internet freedom programming.

After a year at the NDI, she moved over to the World Bank, another notorious vehicle for Washingtons power projection.

At the World Bank, Maher oversaw the creation of the Open Development Technology Alliance (ODTA), an initiative that uses new technologies to impose more aggressive neoliberal economic policies on developing countries.

Mahers LinkedIn page notes that her work entailed designing and implementing open government and open data in developing and transitioning nations, especially in the Middle East and North Africa.

At the time of her employment at the World Bank, the Arab Spring protests were erupting.

In October 2012, in the early stages of the proxy war in Syria, Maher tweeted that she was planning a trip to Gaziantep, a Turkish city near the Syrian border that became the main hub for the Western-backed opposition. Gaziantep was at the time crawling with Syrian insurgents and foreign intelligence operatives plotting to topple the government of President Bashar al-Assad.

Just two months later, in December, she tweeted that was was on a flight to Libya. Just over a year before, a NATO regime-change war had destroyed the Libyan government, and foreign-backed insurgents had killed leader Muammar Qadhafi, unleashing a wave of violence and open-air slave markets.

Today, Libya has no unified central government and is still plagued by a grueling civil war. What Maher was doing in the war-torn country in 2012 is not clear.

Mahers repeated trips to the Middle East and North Africa right around the time of these uprisings and Western intervention campaigns raised eyebrows among local activists.

In 2016, when Maher was named executive director of the Wikimedia Foundation, a prominent Tunisian activist named Slim Amamou spoke out, alleging that Katherine Maher is probably a CIA agent.

Amamou briefly served as secretary of state for sport and youth in Tunisias transitional government, before later resigning. He noted that Maher traveled to the country several times since the Arab Spring protests broke out in 2011, and he found it strange that her affiliations kept changing.

Maher replied angrily, seriously, Slim? Youve welcomed me in your home.

Amamou shot back, you gave me the impression that you were not who you claimed to be back then.

Maher denied the accusation. Im not any sort of agent, she said. You can dislike me, but please dont defame me.

Amamou responded, I dont dislike you. Im doing my duty of protecting the internet.

Amamou lamented that the Wikimedia foundation is changing.. and not in a good way.

Its sad, because rare are organisations that have this reach in developing world, he added.

In April 2017, in her new capacity as head of the Wikimedia Foundation, Katherine Maher participated in an event for the US State Department.

The talk was a Washington Foreign Press Center Briefing, entitled Wikipedia in a Post-fact World. It was published at the official State Department website.

Maher spoke about the libertarian philosophy behind Wikipedia, echoing the Ayn Randian ideology of founder Jimmy Wales.

When journalists asked how Wikipedia deals with highly charged topics, where some entities sometimes countries, sometimes various other entities are often engaged in conflict with each other, Maher repeatedly provided a non-answer, recycling vague platitudes about the Wikipedia community working together.

The Grayzone has clearly demonstrated how Wikipedia editors overwhelmingly side with Western governments in these editorial conflicts, echoing the perspectives of interventionists and censoring critical voices.

A few months later, in January 2018, Maher appeared on a panel with Michael Hayden, the former director of both the CIA and NSA, and a notorious hater of journalists, as well with a top Indian government official, K. VijayRaghavan.

The talk, entitled Lies Propaganda and Truth, was held by the organization behind the Nobel Prize.

The moderator of the discussion, Mattias Fyrenius, the CEO of the Nobel Prizes media arm, asked Maher: There is some kind of information war going on and maybe you can say that there is a war going on between the lies, and the propaganda, and the facts, and maybe truth do you agree?

Yes, Maher responded in agreement. She added her own question: What are the institutions, what is the obligation of institutions to actually think about what the future looks like, if we actually want to pass through this period with our integrity intact?

Hayden, the former US spy agency chief, then blamed the Russians for waging that information war. He referred to Moscow as the adversary, and claimed the Russian information bubble, information dominance machine, created so much confusion.

Maher laughed in approval, disputing nothing that Hayden said. In the same discussion, Maher also threw WikiLeaks (which is blacklisted on Wikipedia) under the bus, affirming, Not WikiLeaks, I want to be clear, were not the same organization. The former CIA director next to her chuckled.

Today, Maher is a member of the advisory board of the US governments technology regime-change arm the Open Technology Fund (OPT) a fact she proudly boasts on her LinkedIn profile.

The OPT was created in 2012 as a project of Radio Free Asia, an information warfare vehicle that the New York Times once described as a worldwide propaganda network built by the CIA.

Since disaffiliating from this CIA cutout in 2019, the OPT is now bankrolled by the US Agency for Global Media, the governments propaganda arm, formerly known as the Broadcasting Board of Governors.

Like Mahers former employer the National Democratic Institute, the OPT advances US imperial interests in the guise of promoting internet freedom and new technologies. It also provides large grants to opposition groups in foreign nations targeted by Washington for regime change.

While she serves today as the executive director of the Wikimedia Foundation, Katherine Maher remains a fellow at the Truman National Security Project, a Washington, DC think tank that grooms former military and intelligence professionals for careers in Democratic Party politics.

The Truman Project website identifies Mahers expertise as international development.

As The Grayzones Max Blumenthal reported, the most prominent fellow of the Truman Project is Pete Buttigieg, the US Naval intelligence veteran who emerged as a presidential frontrunner in the Democratic primary earlier this year.

The extensive participation by the head of the Wikimedia Foundation in US government regime-change networks raises serious questions about the organizations commitment to neutrality.

Perhaps the unchecked problem of political bias and coordinated smear campaigns by a small coterie of Wikipedia editors is not a bug, but a deliberately conceived feature of the website.

Ben Norton is a journalist, writer, and filmmaker. He is the assistant editor of The Grayzone, and the producer of the Moderate Rebels podcast, which he co-hosts with editor Max Blumenthal. His website is BenNorton.comand he tweets at @BenjaminNorton.

See more here:
Meet Wikipedias Ayn Rand-loving founder and Wikimedia Foundations regime-change operative CEO - The Grayzone