Archive for the ‘Word Press’ Category

How To Move WordPress Blog To Another Server Easily Part 1 – Video

24-09-2011 17:04 How To Move Your WordPress Blog Part 1 http://www.davidbatterson.com Watch How To Move Your WordPress Blog Part 2 http How To Move Your WordPress Blog Part 1 This video tutorial will teach you how to transfer a blog installation from one domain and hosting account to another, or from one directory to another on the same server. Using the XML export option to save the entire blog database to your computer for uploading to your new install directory. This is part 1 of 2.

View original post here:
How To Move WordPress Blog To Another Server Easily Part 1 - Video

WordPress Tutorial For Beginners Part 5 – Appearance Settings, Menus and Widgets – Video

20-09-2011 13:28 desireadifference.com | In this fifth WordPress tutorial for beginners, I run you though changing your site's appearance by showing you how to install and search for themes for your WordPress website. I also show you how to customize your WordPress website menu and installing widgets. Make sure to view the rest of my "WordPress Tutorials for Beginners" video series on YouTube and subscribe to my channel. If you would like help in your business, contact me at http

See original here:
WordPress Tutorial For Beginners Part 5 - Appearance Settings, Menus and Widgets - Video

Oil and gas industry says 'fracking' a nasty slur

 

Published Thursday, February 02, 2012 12:14 AM By JONATHAN FAHEY
Associated Press

Gillie Waddington of Enfield, N.Y., raises a fist during rally last month against hydraulic fracturing of natural gas wells at the Legislative Office Building in Albany, N.Y. President Barack Obama didnÕt use the F-word during his recent State of the Union speech nor did he mention the technology used to get it, known commonly as fracking. That's because the word has become a lightning rod.

NEW YORK -- A different kind of F-word is stirring a linguistic and political debate as controversial as what it defines.

The word is "fracking" -- as in hydraulic fracturing, a technique long used by the oil and gas industry to free oil and gas from rock.

It's not in the dictionary, the industry hates it, and President Barack Obama didn't use it in his State of the Union speech -- even as he praised federal subsidies for it.

The word sounds nasty, and environmental advocates have been able to use it to generate opposition -- and revulsion -- to what they say is a nasty process that threatens water supplies.

"It obviously calls to mind other less socially polite terms, and folks have been able to take advantage of that," said Kate Sinding, a senior attorney at the Natural Resources Defense Council who works on drilling issues.

One of the chants at an anti-drilling rally in Albany earlier this month was "No fracking way!"

Industry executives argue that the word is deliberately misspelled by environmental activists and that it has become a slur that should not be used by media outlets that strive for objectivity.

"It's a co-opted word and a co-opted spelling used to make it look as offensive as people can try to make it look," said Michael Kehs, vice president for Strategic Affairs at Chesapeake Energy, the nation's second-largest natural gas producer.

To the surviving humans of the sci-fi TV series Battlestar Galactica, it has nothing to do with oil and gas. It is used as a substitute for the very down-to-Earth curse word.

Michael Weiss, a professor of linguistics at Cornell University, says the word originated as simple industry jargon, but has taken on a negative meaning over time -- much like the word "silly" once meant "holy."

But "frack" also happens to sound like "smack" and "whack," with more violent connotations.

"When you hear the word 'fracking,' what lights up your brain is the profanity," says Deborah Mitchell, who teaches marketing at the University of Wisconsin's School of Business. "Negative things come to mind."

Obama did not use the word in his State of the Union address Tuesday night, when he said his administration will help ensure natural gas will be developed safely, suggesting it would support 600,000 jobs by the end of the decade.

In hydraulic fracturing, millions of gallons of water, sand and chemicals are pumped into wells to break up underground rock formations and create escape routes for the oil and gas. In recent years, the industry has learned to combine the practice with the ability to drill horizontally into beds of shale, layers of fine-grained rock that in some cases have trapped ancient organic matter that has cooked into oil and gas.

By doing so, drillers have unlocked natural gas deposits across the East, South and Midwest that are large enough to supply the U.S. for decades. Natural gas prices have dipped to decade-low levels, reducing customer bills and prompting manufacturers who depend on the fuel to expand operations in the U.S.

Environmentalists worry that the fluid could leak into water supplies from cracked casings in wells. They are also concerned that wastewater from the process could contaminate water supplies if not properly treated or disposed of. And they worry the method allows too much methane, the main component of natural gas and an extraordinarily potent greenhouse gas, to escape.

Some want to ban the practice altogether, while others want tighter regulations.

The Environmental Protection Agency is studying the issue and may propose federal regulations. The industry prefers that states regulate the process.

Some states have banned it. A New York proposal to lift its ban drew about 40,000 public comments -- an unprecedented total -- inspired in part by slogans such as "Don't Frack With New York."

The drilling industry has generally spelled the word without a "K," using terms like "frac job" or "frac fluid."

Energy historian Daniel Yergin spells it "fraccing" in his book, The Quest: Energy, Security and the Remaking of the Modern World. The glossary maintained by the oilfield services company Schlumberger includes only "frac" and "hydraulic fracturing."

The spelling of "fracking" began appearing in the media and in oil and gas company materials long before the process became controversial. It first was used in an Associated Press story in 1981. That same year, an oil and gas company called Velvet Exploration, based in British Columbia, issued a press release that detailed its plans to complete "fracking" a well.

The word was used in trade journals throughout the 1980s. In 1990, Commerce Secretary Robert Mosbacher announced U.S. oil engineers would travel to the Soviet Union to share drilling technology, including fracking.

The word does not appear in The Associated Press Stylebook, a guide for news organizations. David Minthorn, deputy standards editor at the AP, says there are tentative plans to include an entry in the 2012 edition.

He said the current standard is to avoid using the word except in direct quotes, and to instead use "hydraulic fracturing."

That won't stop activists -- sometimes called "fracktivists" -- from repeating the word as often as possible.

"It was created by the industry, and the industry is going to have to live with it," says the NRDC's Sinding.

Dave McCurdy, CEO of the American Gas Association, agrees, much to his dismay: "It's Madison Avenue hell," he says.



More here:
Oil and gas industry says 'fracking' a nasty slur

Word on Alstom bids expected in March

Officials and former employees waiting for news on whether more work is coming to Alstom will have to hold their breath for another month.

Both Mayor Shawn Hogan and Hornell IDA Executive Director Jim Griffin said they’re waiting for word on several contracts the transit giant bid on in 2011, and that they knew only what Alstom officials had told them.

Griffin is expecting to hear whether Alstom will secure a contract with the Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority in March. He initially believed the contract would be awarded in February.

He wasn’t sure what caused the delay in awarding the contract, but said such delays are common.

“We feel confident Alstom will get it. Apparently (the contract) isn’t high on the priority list for the MBTA board,” said Griffin. “They put them off, put them off, put them off, then they get them done. There’s nothing we can do about it.”

In early October, city officials said Alstom was submitting best and final offers with the MBTA, the Metropolitan Transit Authority in New York City, and the Bay Area Rapid Transit District in San Francisco. The MBTA contract is expected to last four or five years, said Griffin in October.

With the submission of best and final offers, officials expected Alstom to receive word on whether they received a contract early in 2012. So far, they’re still waiting.

Hogan said the New York City contract is expected to be awarded in late winter or early spring in 2012.

“Hopefully we’ll get some good news at the end of February or in early March,” said Hogan.

While Alstom is chasing new contracts, work on 120 Delaware River Port Authority PATCO transit fleet cars started in March 2011 at the Hornell facility. As many as 40 employees were expected to be hired to work on the PATCO cars once the project is in full swing.

That still left most of the 500 workers laid-off in 2010 from the Hornell plant without immediate employment opportunities with the transit company. In 2008, the company employed as many as 1,100 people in the Hornell area.

The last of the PATCO cars is expected to be delivered in three years. Alstom was awarded the contract in December 2010.

The PATCO contract was a bright spot for Alstom at the tail-end of 2010, after losing out on bids with the Washington Metro Area Transit Authority and Amtrak, while another bid with Societe de transport de Montreal was split between Bombardier Transportation and Alstom.

A call to Chuck Wochele, vice president for Industry and Government Relations for Alstom, wasn’t returned by press time.

In previous stories, Tim Brown, director of communications for Alstom’s North American Region, said the company wouldn’t comment until contracts have been finalized.

Continued here:
Word on Alstom bids expected in March

No Word From Family Of MN Couple Missing In Wreck

(credit: U.S. Embassy In Rome)

WHITE BEAR LAKE, Minn. (AP) — There has been no word from the family of a Minnesota couple missing in the Italian cruise ship disaster since the search for missing people was called off.

Members of the Jerry and Barbara Heil family of White Bear Lake did not immediately return phone calls from The Associated Press on Tuesday. The family website has not been updated since last Wednesday.

The Heils are members of St. Pius X church in White Bear Lake. Parish administrator Larry Erickson says he has not heard from family members recently but that parishioners have been keeping the couple in their prayers.

Italian emergency officials decided to end the search due to the danger to rescue workers.

Seventeen bodies have been recovered. Sixteen people are listed as missing but are presumed dead.

(© Copyright 2012 The Associated Press. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.)

See original here:
No Word From Family Of MN Couple Missing In Wreck