Archive for the ‘Word Press’ Category

Police give fans Y-word warning

The Met Police has warned fans heading to this weekend's Premier League clash between Spurs and West Ham they may face arrest if they chant the Y-word.

One Tottenham Hotspur supporter has been arrested for allegedly using the Y-word in chants at today's home game.

He was held on suspicion of committing a section 5 public order offence at half time in the stadium's East Stand.

Tottenham Hotspur fans have defied police warnings not to use the Y-word in chants.

The Metropolitan Police said they would be "on the look out" for football supporters who used the word during today's home game against West Ham at White Hart Lane.

The Spurs supporters chanted "We'll sing what we want" and "Yid Army" at this afternoon's match.

The Met said that as of 5pm, no arrests had yet been made. Officers had been speaking about the issue with fans on their way into the stadium.

I'm at West Ham United to talk to Sam Allardyce about the Met Police announcement that those caught using the Y-word at Spurs on Sunday could face arrest.

Sam Allardyce says: "You've got to be very aware about what you choose to chant and what you choose to sing. If they're made aware of it, you've got no excuse. It's something that our society is hugely involved in. Support the team, support the lads on the field, and forget about everything else.

"It is very important that those who use the word suffer the consequences."

Read more here:
Police give fans Y-word warning

Obama open to name change for Washington Redskins

WASHINGTON (AP) President Barack Obama says he would "think about changing" the Washington Redskins' name if he owned the football team as he waded into the controversy involving a word many consider offensive to Native Americans.

Obama, in an interview with The Associated Press, said team names such as the Redskins offend "a sizable group of people." He said that while fans get attached to the names, nostalgia may not be a good enough reason to keep them in place.

"I don't know whether our attachment to a particular name should override the real legitimate concerns that people have about these things," he said in the interview, which was conducted Friday at the White House.

An avid sports fan who roots for his hometown Chicago Bears, Obama said he doesn't think Washington football fans are purposely trying to offend American Indians. "I don't want to detract from the wonderful Redskins fans that are here. They love their team and rightly so," he said.

But he appeared to come down on the side of those who have sharply criticized the football team's name, noting that Indians "feel pretty strongly" about mascots and team names that depict negative stereotypes about their heritage.

The team's owner, Dan Snyder has vowed to never abandon the name.

NFL Commissioner Roger Goodell said last month that the league should pay attention to those offended by the name - a subtle change in position for Goodell, who had more strongly supported the name in his previous statements this year.

Lanny J. Davis, an attorney for the Redskins, said the team's fans don't intend to "disparage or disrespect" anyone.

"The name `Washington Redskins' is 80 years old. It's our history and legacy and tradition," Davis said in an emailed statement in which he also identified himself as an Obama supporter. "We Redskins fans sing `Hail to the Redskins' every Sunday as a word of honor, not disparagement."

Other professional sports teams have Indian names, including football's Kansas City Chiefs and baseball's Atlanta Braves and Cleveland Indians. Davis referred to fans of those teams and hockey's Chicago Blackhawks in his statement, saying Redskins fans "love our team and its name and, like those fans, we do not intend to disparage or disrespect a racial or ethnic group."

See the original post here:
Obama open to name change for Washington Redskins

Start the Presses: Inside story on a political hit piece

On my desk sits a pink-and-black political mailer that screams that Assemblyman Mike Gatto is "Porn's Best Friend." Inside is a nearly 1,000-word piece, taken word-for-word, and without permission, from the Glendale News-Press. Perhaps you're received a copy.

The mailer, in politician-speak, is a hit piece, and a massive copyright violation besides. The people that put this out, the AIDS Healthcare Foundation, should be ashamed of themselves. Supporting AIDS research and helping those suffering from HIV and AIDS things the foundation does are worthy. How it prosecutes or persecutes its causes should be examined, as should the head of its president, Michael Weinstein.

There are plenty of worthy causes out there, Michael, and ripping off our content and putting the News-Press in a bad light is a sure way to lose friends. And in your case, donations, when people read this and hopefully decide to support more reputable organizations.

Some background: A few weeks back, Ron Kaye wrote a column an opinion piece sharply critical of Gatto's actions in regard to a bill that would have required condoms in all adult filming statewide, a bill strongly supported by the AIDS foundation. (Los Angeles County voters recently approved a similar measure for porn shoots locally.)

In short, Kaye felt Gatto used parliamentary measures and excuses to kill the bill. Gatto claimed it was the state Senate that killed the bill, not him. Fine.

We covered this on the news side in only the briefest manner. As far as I know, no group has pulled a porn permit in Burbank, Glendale, Montrose or La Caada in the history of film, making the issue somewhat moot locally.

However, because our area has but one assemblyman, and that happens to be Gatto, I gave Kaye the go-ahead to vent his spleen. Often, I hear from Gatto's people if they dislike something we do. I heard nary a peep.

Then came this mailer, and the fecal matter hit the whirling device.

On Tuesday, I left a pointed voicemail for Weinstein, demanding he explain himself. Instead, I got a call from the foundation's lawyer, Tom Myers. For his part, he was unfailingly professional, and said he understood my concerns. When he asked what I might want, I responded directly and simply:

Put out another mailer, sent to the same households that received the first one, stating the AIDS Healthcare Foundation did not have permission to use the piece and apologizing for doing so.

Go here to see the original:
Start the Presses: Inside story on a political hit piece

How to install WordPress 3.6? – Video


How to install WordPress 3.6?
See this video and easily install word press in local host. http://worldcomputerinfo.blogspot.com.

By: Izaj Ahmed

Excerpt from:
How to install WordPress 3.6? - Video

Fans warned over Yid chants

Fans warned over Yid chants

7:27pm Thursday 3rd October 2013 in National News Press Association 2013

Tottenham Hotspur fans could be arrested if they use the word Yid at Sunday's home match against London rivals West Ham United.

Scotland Yard said both sets of supporters will be watched by officers and warned them they may be committing an offence if they use the word.

The issue has caused a race row because Spurs fans use the word Yid - a term for Jew which is often considered derogatory - to describe themselves and their north London team.

However, the word is also used by opposing sets of supporters to taunt the Lilywhites.

Prime Minister David Cameron recently weighed into the debate when he told the Jewish Chronicle: "There's a difference between Spurs fans self-describing themselves as Yids and someone calling someone a Yid as an insult.

"You have to be motivated by hate. Hate speech should be prosecuted, but only when it's motivated by hate."

Comedian David Baddiel - a Chelsea fan - has long campaigned for fans to stop using the term.

Scotland Yard said its officers will be taking action to "stamp out" chants featuring the word, and said that while it has historically been perceived by some as acceptable, it causes "harassment, alarm or distress to others".

Go here to see the original:
Fans warned over Yid chants