Congress members intervene in Google censorship of life-saving Abortion Pill Reversal – Pregnancy Help News
A group of U.S. senators challenged Google over the tech giants double standard and censorship of pro-life Abortion Pill Reversal (APR) ads while advertisements for deadly abortion pills are still allowed on the search engine.
We are deeply concerned by Googles decision to ban Live Actions pro-life ads promoting Heartbeat Internationals Abortion Pill Reversal (APR) hotline, the senators wrote in a letter Thursday. Googles pro-life censorship is out of step with the science and reflects an unacceptable bias against pro-life views. We insist that you immediately reverse this decision.
Google pulled APR ads from pro-life group Live Action Tuesday following a report from a group named Center for Countering Digital Hate (CCDH). The report was publicized in an article from The Daily Beast parroting abortion industry anti-APR narratives such as that the APR protocol is dangerous and not based on science. Abortion proponents regularly attack APR legislatively, in the courts, and in the media.
Quashing APR ads on the internet or social media means women seeking a second chance at choosing life for their child will be blocked from obtaining the information necessary for them to have that second chance and choice.
[Click here to subscribe to Pregnancy Help News!]
Google first approved Live Actions APR ads let them run for more than four months, the senators noted, at a cost of more than $170,000 and directing thousands of people to the APR hotline.
Then, their letter states:
On September 13, Google unexpectedly shut down these ads without warning or evidence, citing its unreliable claims policy. Google has subsequently indicated that it took this action after reviewing a one-sided pro-abortion report provided by a left-leaning news agency. Google has also since stated that it censored APR ads because they made unproven medical claims, citing serious concerns from the pro-abortion American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG). It is shameful that Google has acted to appease pro-abortion activists by silencing pro-life voices, rather than considering all the evidence and following the science.
Montana Sen. Steve Daines (R) spearheaded the letter to Google CEO Sundar Pichai. Daines is the founder and chair of the Senate Pro-Life Caucus and was joined in sending the memo by Senators Cindy Hyde-Smith (R-Miss.), Roger Wicker (R-Miss.), Marsha Blackburn (R-Tenn.), Mike Braun (R-Ind.), Marco Rubio (R-Fla.), Mike Lee (R-Utah), Ted Cruz (Texas), Tom Cotton (R-Ark.), James Lankford (R-Okla.) and Jim Inhofe (R-Okla.).
Google disingenuously cites unreliable claims as their reason to ban the promotion of Abortion Pill Reversal, but has obviously failed to understand the FDA-approved treatment that the reversal technology uses, Live Action said in a statement. Live Action and pro-life medical professionals across the country are proud to promote the Abortion Pill Reversal regimen, which involves an FDA-approved, bioidentical pregnancy hormone called progesterone that has been used for dozens of years to prevent miscarriage and has already saved thousands of lives.
Heartbeat International, the largest network of pregnancy help organizations in the world, manages the Abortion Pill Rescue Network (APRN), made up of some 1,000 medical professionals and pregnancy help centers who facilitate APR.
Heartbeat President Jor-El Godsey said there was no issue with a policy restricting unreliable claims, however the problem is that this policy is being abused.
Unfortunately, how this policy is being implemented by Google protects Big Abortion and forces women to go through with an abortion that they no longer want, Godsey said.
Tweet This: Googles pro-life censorship is out of step with the science and reflects an unacceptable bias against pro-life views"-Group of US senators
Chemical abortion, or the abortion pill, also known as medical abortion, RU-486, DIY, or self-managed abortion, is a two-drug process.
The first drug, mifepristone, destabilizes a womans pregnancy by blocking progesterone, the natural hormone necessary to sustain a womans pregnancy. This typically ends her unborn childs life.
The second drug, misoprostol, is taken a day or so later and causes the mother to deliver her deceased child, provided the chemical abortion is successful.
The abortion pill has numerous possible side effects associated with it, some severe. If complications from the abortion pill do occur, the woman is typically at home, often alone to deal with the (at times severe) side effects.
However, if a woman regrets starting a chemical abortion and she acts soon enough, she may be able to save her unborn child with APR.
The protocol entails administering progesterone to counter the first abortion drug and is an updated application of a treatment used safely since the 1950s to prevent miscarriage. A 2018 peer-reviewed study showed positive results with APR, with 64%-68% of the pregnancies saved through the protocol, no increase in birth defects and lower preterm delivery rate than the general population.
The Abortion Pill Rescue Network answers more than 150 mission-critical calls each month from women who regret their abortion decision. Women consistently report having found the APRN online after starting the chemical abortion process and seeking answers for how to reverse the abortion pill's effects. Statistics show that more than 2,500 lives have been saved (and counting) through the Abortion Pill Reversal protocol.
Live Actions ads with Baby Olivia, a medically accurate animation of human development in the womb, were pulled as well. The pro-life group has been censored on social media in the past for its pro-life message.
Missouri Senator Josh Hawley (R) wrote Pichai one day earlier about Google pulling Live Actions ads and ads from Choose Life Marketing, a Missouri-based company. Hawley noted that Planned Parenthood advertising that violated Googles stated policy prohibiting using keywords related to getting an abortion were allowed by Google.
In a dramatic and unprecedented move, Google has sided squarely with extremist pro-abortion political ideology, banning the pro-life counterpoint and life-saving information from being promoted on their platform, Lila Rose, founder and president of Live Action said. They arent hiding their bias anymore: Googles censorship baldly reveals that the corporation is in the pocket of the abortion industry.
The double standard decried by Live Action, Heartbeat, and the U.S. senators hinges on the fact that abortion drugs are still sold on the internet, despite the many safety risks. U.S. Food and Drug Administration health standards in place since the FDA approved the abortion pill in 2,000 stipulate an in-person exam and prescription by a certified healthcare professional in a clinical setting.
The group of 11 senators reference the abortion pills dangers and the double standard in the letter.
While banning pro-life APR ads, Google continues to allow ads for purveyors of the deadly abortion pill mifepristone by mail, despite the fact this drug has resulted in at least 24 mothers tragic deaths and at least 1,042 mothers being sent to the hospital, they wrote. Googles double standard on abortion is disingenuous and an egregious abuse of its enormous market power to protect the billion-dollar abortion industry.
The practical consequence of Googles abortion distortion is that pregnant mothers in crisis will only have the option to be marketed abortion drugs through Googles ad platforms, they said, while life-affirming alternatives are suppressed.
Tweet This: The practical consequence of Googles abortion distortion is that pregnant moms in crisis will only be marketed abortion drugs
Both Hawley and the 11 senators questioned Pichai about whether Google had recent contact with any pro-abortion entities. The Daines group wanted to know names if there was contact.
Hawley also asked about the rate at which ads from pro-life organizations are deemed ineligible and how Google ensures that its widely reported internal progressive bent does not affect ad eligibility decisions.
The Daines letter asked whether experts were on both sides of the abortion issue were consulted in the decision to ban the APR ads, or only those who promote abortion, and whether Google will also remove ads for the abortion pill mifepristone.
Again, we urge you to reverse Googles unjust and indefensible decision to suppress these pro-life life-saving APR information ads, the senators wrote, and we look forward to your prompt response to the above questions.
Editor's note: Heartbeat International manages theAbortion Pill Rescue Network (APRN) and Pregnancy Help News.
Read the original:
Congress members intervene in Google censorship of life-saving Abortion Pill Reversal - Pregnancy Help News
- DeepSeek is giving the world a window into Chinese censorship and information control - CNN International - February 1st, 2025 [February 1st, 2025]
- Executive Order to the State Department Sideswipes Freedom Tools, Threatens Censorship Resistance, Privacy, and Anonymity of Millions - EFF - February 1st, 2025 [February 1st, 2025]
- ADF presses five major universities for records on government censorship - ADF Media - February 1st, 2025 [February 1st, 2025]
- Why We Should Fear Trump Silencing Science and What We Can Do About It - U.S. News & World Report - February 1st, 2025 [February 1st, 2025]
- Researchers are terrified of Trumps freeze on science. The rest of us should be, too. - Vox.com - February 1st, 2025 [February 1st, 2025]
- Conservative law firm launches probe into five major universities for alleged 'censorship regime' - Fox News - February 1st, 2025 [February 1st, 2025]
- Some of the most ingenious ways people are bypassing DeepSeeks censorship: Using emojis might work - AS USA - February 1st, 2025 [February 1st, 2025]
- Comment | Censorship in the US is rearing its ugly head againbut the art world isn't taking it lying down - Art Newspaper - February 1st, 2025 [February 1st, 2025]
- Seizure of Sally Mann photographs in Texas revives old debates about obscenity, free expression - Free Speech Center - February 1st, 2025 [February 1st, 2025]
- Chinese films dodging censors have no place to go. Can they crack into Taiwan? - Los Angeles Times - February 1st, 2025 [February 1st, 2025]
- Meta back in the tent after agreeing to settle Trumps $25M censorship lawsuit - SiliconANGLE News - February 1st, 2025 [February 1st, 2025]
- We tried out DeepSeek. It worked well, until we asked it about Tiananmen Square and Taiwan - The Guardian - February 1st, 2025 [February 1st, 2025]
- Library Director Rachel Winner speaks on the role of libraries, Censorship. - Sullivan Daily Times - February 1st, 2025 [February 1st, 2025]
- Day 3: USC Conference on Censorship in the Sciences - Why Evolution Is True - February 1st, 2025 [February 1st, 2025]
- DeepSeek Starts to Explain Tiananmen Square Massacre, Then Gets Caught by Built-In Censorship System - Futurism - February 1st, 2025 [February 1st, 2025]
- A White House order claims to end 'censorship.' What does that mean? - NPR - January 27th, 2025 [January 27th, 2025]
- DeepSeek is the hottest new AI chatbotbut it comes with Chinese censorship built in - Fortune - January 27th, 2025 [January 27th, 2025]
- Opinion | Conservatives Have No Interest in Censorship - The Wall Street Journal - January 27th, 2025 [January 27th, 2025]
- Donald Trump and Elon Musk appear in Ben & Jerry's censorship lawsuit against Unilever, its parent company. Here's why. - Business Insider - January 27th, 2025 [January 27th, 2025]
- Disinformation experts blast Trumps executive order on government censorship as direct assault on reality - CNN - January 27th, 2025 [January 27th, 2025]
- Ben & Jerry's is accusing its parent company of censorship because it allegedly blocked a post that mentioned Donald Trump - Fortune - January 27th, 2025 [January 27th, 2025]
- 'This is censorship': Trump freeze on communications forces medical journal to pull HHS authors' article - STAT - January 27th, 2025 [January 27th, 2025]
- Analysis | Trumps anti-censorship order has a blind spot - The Washington Post - January 27th, 2025 [January 27th, 2025]
- The TikTok Ban: Foreign Influence Through Censorship, Propaganda, and Espionage - Independent Women's Forum - January 27th, 2025 [January 27th, 2025]
- DeepSeek: This is what live censorship looks like in the Chinese AI chatbot - Trending Topics SEE - January 27th, 2025 [January 27th, 2025]
- Why President Donald Trump signed an executive order banning government 'censorship' - USA TODAY - January 27th, 2025 [January 27th, 2025]
- Government Officials Who Engaged In Censorship Must Be Held Accountable - The Daily Wire - January 27th, 2025 [January 27th, 2025]
- Statement from the Kids Right to Read Project on the U.S. Department of Educations Dismissal of Book Bans as a "Hoax" - Blogging Censorship - January 27th, 2025 [January 27th, 2025]
- JD Vance says big tech firms still very much on notice for censoring conservatives: Face the consequences - New York Post - January 27th, 2025 [January 27th, 2025]
- Trump talks free speech while moving to muzzle those he disagrees with - Los Angeles Times - January 27th, 2025 [January 27th, 2025]
- Trump targets government censorship with new executive order - WXLV - January 27th, 2025 [January 27th, 2025]
- What's behind a White House order ending 'federal censorship' - KUOW News and Information - January 27th, 2025 [January 27th, 2025]
- Trump Takes Aim at Social Media 'Censorship' With Executive Order - CNET - January 27th, 2025 [January 27th, 2025]
- EU doubles down on social media censorship that will not be confined to Europe following concerns about Musks free speech policy on X - ADF... - January 27th, 2025 [January 27th, 2025]
- Is TikTok Turning Into a Censorship Machine? Users Witness New Restrictions After Trump's Order - Benzinga - January 27th, 2025 [January 27th, 2025]
- FIRE to University of Texas at Dallas: Stop censoring the student press - Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression - January 27th, 2025 [January 27th, 2025]
- Students concerned over censorship, career instability in wake of TikTok ban - Daily Free Press - January 27th, 2025 [January 27th, 2025]
- TikTok Users Now On RedNote Are Starting To See One Very Big Problem With the App - Mic - January 27th, 2025 [January 27th, 2025]
- Tweeting the truth: Should social media companies have the right to censor content? - berkeleyhighjacket.com - January 27th, 2025 [January 27th, 2025]
- Kiehl's won't beat around the bush following ad censorship - Marketing Interactive - January 27th, 2025 [January 27th, 2025]
- Press freedom in Turkey declined further in 2024 amid censorship, arrests and intimidation: report - Stockholm Center for Freedom - January 27th, 2025 [January 27th, 2025]
- America Is No Longer the Home of the Free Internet - The Atlantic - January 19th, 2025 [January 19th, 2025]
- Call for censorship culture to end as Unity Mitfords German diary is revealed - The Guardian - January 19th, 2025 [January 19th, 2025]
- Banning TikTok enables online censorship - Freedom of the Press Foundation - January 19th, 2025 [January 19th, 2025]
- Zuckerbergs conservative pivot fogs our understanding of censorship - Kansas Reflector - January 19th, 2025 [January 19th, 2025]
- The TikTok ban isnt about national security its censorship and government control - The Hill - January 19th, 2025 [January 19th, 2025]
- How the Trump administration threatens internet freedoms - Al Jazeera English - January 19th, 2025 [January 19th, 2025]
- Censorship or common sense? - Editor And Publisher Magazine - January 19th, 2025 [January 19th, 2025]
- TikTok refugees flock to another (heavily censored) Chinese app - The Washington Post - January 19th, 2025 [January 19th, 2025]
- Bill Burr on Adapting His Ahole Vibe, Wanting a Hostile Crowd for New Hulu Special and How a Rabbi Changed His Perspective on Censorship (EXCLUSIVE) -... - January 19th, 2025 [January 19th, 2025]
- In Russia, Reading Can Be Harmful To Your Health - Air Mail - January 19th, 2025 [January 19th, 2025]
- The Media Is Giving Away Its Rights Even Before Trump Tries to Take Them - The Nation - January 19th, 2025 [January 19th, 2025]
- How Trumps Return Is Pushing the Media to Self-Censor - Mother Jones - January 19th, 2025 [January 19th, 2025]
- From Russia to the EU: The high stakes of Metas content moderation shift - Global Voices - January 19th, 2025 [January 19th, 2025]
- Meta is getting rid of fact checkers. Zuckerberg acknowledged more harmful content will appear on the platforms now - CNN International - January 9th, 2025 [January 9th, 2025]
- Mark Zuckerbergs excuse for ending fact-checking program is a hoax, say experts: It is a lie that we are censors - EL PAS USA - January 9th, 2025 [January 9th, 2025]
- Legislative Efforts Heat Up on Book, Curricular Censorship Attempts | Censorship News - School Library Journal - January 9th, 2025 [January 9th, 2025]
- Ok, Zuck: So You Say You're Going To Stop Censoring Conservatives; Call Me Skeptical | Tomi Lahren - Outkick - January 9th, 2025 [January 9th, 2025]
- Meta follows Musks lead on censorship but ad industry keeps its distance from panic - Digiday - January 9th, 2025 [January 9th, 2025]
- How games might be the key to avoiding digital censorship - EurekAlert - January 9th, 2025 [January 9th, 2025]
- The tyranny of woke censorship is finally over and its all thanks to Donald Trump - The Telegraph - January 9th, 2025 [January 9th, 2025]
- If Supreme Court upholds TikTok ban, U.S. will see first-of-its-kind act of censorship | Opinion - Sacramento Bee - January 9th, 2025 [January 9th, 2025]
- Disney under pressure from conservative shareholders to disavow ad censorship - Washington Times - January 9th, 2025 [January 9th, 2025]
- Meta is Getting Rid of Fact-Checkers to Reduce Censorship on Facebook and Instagram - PetaPixel - January 9th, 2025 [January 9th, 2025]
- Mark Zuckerberg's Meta is moving moderators from California to Texas to combat concerns about bias and censorship - Business Insider - January 9th, 2025 [January 9th, 2025]
- Zuckerberg says Facebook will stop censoring and allow more political free speech: X effect - Must Read Alaska - January 9th, 2025 [January 9th, 2025]
- Students in every country have the right to free speech! Oppose the censorship of the Sri Lankan IYSSE! - WSWS - January 9th, 2025 [January 9th, 2025]
- Is the end of the Big Tech industrial censorship upon us? - The Spectator World - January 9th, 2025 [January 9th, 2025]
- Dont let Facebook off the hook for its pro-censorship past so easily - New York Post - January 9th, 2025 [January 9th, 2025]
- Mark Zuckerberg rolls back Meta censorship ahead of Donald Trump's return to White House - Washington Times - January 9th, 2025 [January 9th, 2025]
- Grounds of Getty Museum in LA Catch Fire, The Washington Posts Cartoonist Quits Over Censorship: Morning Links for January 8, 2025 - ARTnews - January 9th, 2025 [January 9th, 2025]
- Is this the end of the Big Tech censorship industrial complex? - The Spectator - January 9th, 2025 [January 9th, 2025]
- Comedian ended her 'Stockholm Syndrome' with the left, says it's become 'party of censorship' - Fox8tv - January 9th, 2025 [January 9th, 2025]
- Facebook Reverses Course On Censorship, Plus Is The Left Driven By Empathy Or Hate? with Dr. Gad Saad | Will Cain Show - Fox News - January 9th, 2025 [January 9th, 2025]
- Combating The Rising Threat Of Censorship In 2025 - The Daily Wire - January 1st, 2025 [January 1st, 2025]
- Social Media Companies Face Global Tug-of-War Over Free Speech - The New York Times - January 1st, 2025 [January 1st, 2025]
- Elon Musk accused of censoring right-wing X accounts who disagree with him on immigration - Sky News - January 1st, 2025 [January 1st, 2025]
- Conservatives continue to accuse Musk of censorship amid row over immigration - Anadolu Agency | English - January 1st, 2025 [January 1st, 2025]
- Conservatives Score Major Victory Against D.C. Censorship Cartel - AMAC Official Website - Join and Explore the Benefits - January 1st, 2025 [January 1st, 2025]
- Deepseek's V3 is the latest example of state-controlled censorship in Chinese LLMs - THE DECODER - January 1st, 2025 [January 1st, 2025]