Govt says fact-check body to curb misinformation, critics allege censorship – The Indian Express
It all started in January this year, when, out of the blue, a completely new and unrelated clause was added as a postscript to the draft online gaming rules. The clause proposed that the Centres Press Information Bureau can flag and instruct online intermediaries if a piece of information online relating to the government was deemed as fake. Intermediaries would then have to act and take it down.
On Thursday, that proposal was notified by the Ministry of Electronics and IT. Though the reference to the PIB was removed in the final rules, with the government saying it will notify a fact-check unit, the spirit of the legislation remained the same.
As a consequence, online intermediaries social media platforms like Facebook, YouTube and internet service providers like Airtel and Jio will be faced to make a key decision: whether to abide by the government fact-check units version of the truth and take down any content the unit labels as fake, or decide not to take the content down and risk facing litigation.
While the government is billing it as an important measure to curb some amount of misinformation on the Internet, critics are calling it a tool to widen the scope of online censorship in the country, asking the Centre to withdraw them.
Experts believe that the rules could potentially impact a range of stakeholders, including opposition political parties and journalists. Unsurprisingly, the Congress and several other Opposition parties, including the TMC, RJD and CPI(M), have come down heavily on the government over its decision. So have digital rights activists and press associations like the Editors Guild of India, which has called the rules draconian.
Studies have shown that misinformation is a big issue on every major social media platform. In many cases, it is the content that most often goes viral on these sites, thanks to their own algorithms, and users with varying motivations who share such information. But, these platforms have also become an important tool for people particularly from marginalised groups to exercise their right to free speech.
Minister of State for Electronics and IT Rajeev Chandrasekhar has assured that the government-backed fact check body will work in a credible way, in a bid to address the concerns. When we notify the agency, we will certainly be very clear that any doubts in the mind of people that the power will be misused on behalf of the government will be addressed when we notify the agency. There will be a list of dos and donts that it will have to adhere to, he earlier told The Indian Express.
Unfortunately, there is a high probability that this will be used to suppress free speech and stifle criticism of the Union government, and its policies. This may happen today, tomorrow, or ten years in the future, but once there are rules/laws which can be misused, selectively enforced, they will, Prateek Waghre, policy director at the Internet Freedom Foundation told The Indian Express.
The issue at hand is complex. To break it down, it is first important to understand what these rules are not: these fresh amendments do not give the Centre direct powers to order content takedowns. It already enjoys that authority and exercises it frequently under Section 69 (A) of the IT Act, 2000.
However, what the rules say is that intermediaries will have to make reasonable efforts to not host content that will be marked as fake or false or misleading by the governments to-be-notified fact-check unit if they wish to retain their safe harbour, which is legal immunity from third-party content.
The question that arises then is if social media companies will exercise their agency to decide whether they should let a piece of content labelled fake by the government on their platform. If they do, they could lose safe harbour and attract a lawsuit; and if they dont, they will become party to a censorship exercise.
In plain English, it means that if they choose to continue hosting the content despite it being labelled as misleading, they will lose their safe harbour, which would open an option for the government to take them to court, an option that was previously unavailable. Digital rights experts believe that social media companies will err on the side of caution.
Namrata Maheshwari, Asia Pacific policy counsel for the global rights body Access Now said that if platforms have to make the choice between removing content flagged by the government, and being taken to court, they are most likely to choose the former. Litigation, and potentially several cases in multiple courts, would simply be too resource-intensive and high-risk. For its part, the government has tried to circumvent the concerns by saying that the fact-check body will follow a list of d0s and donts and adhere to standards of fact-checking. The standards, however, are currently not known.
There is also a concern around the government changing course on different provisions in the same law. Earlier this year, it established three committees that would hear appeals filed by users of social media companies if they feel that their grievances have not been satisfactorily dealt with by the companies officials.
The idea here was that not everyone might have the option to go to court to challenge content moderation decisions taken by platforms, and hence there needs to be a forum which can offer an additional avenue of recourse to users. But the new rules point to a dichotomy. For government-branded misleading content that has been taken down by a platform, the entity or person who posted it will have no option but to go to court should she decide to appeal the result. There is no in-between.
If a court challenge is the only recourse available to aggrieved parties, then the net result of this amendment is that it has given the government a shortcut to take content down, while increasing the burden on potentially aggrieved parties, Waghre said.
The overarching question around the new rules is if the government should, and can, be the judge, jury and executioner. The governments argument is that since the rules concern misinformation around businesses of the Centre, it is the most well placed to take a call on content that relates to it, since only it has the right data to prove its case.
Critics have, however, pointed to a potential conflict of interest that might arise when a government-appointed body has the final say in information directly related to the government. The independence of the body had been called into question.
for a fact-checking setup to be credible, it must be independent, possess the necessary capacity (technical, journalistic, etc.) to verify information, have an established track-record, and most importantly, not have a conflict of interest about the accuracy of the content it is supposed to vet, Waghre said.
The claim that only the government has the data to prove whether information about it is true or false reflects the need for it to be more open, transparent, objective in its own assessments about its performance so that these determinations can be made independently, he added.
Read more:
Govt says fact-check body to curb misinformation, critics allege censorship - The Indian Express
- Sharyn Rothstein looks at censorship through the eyes of a badass librarian - DC Theater Arts - April 1st, 2025 [April 1st, 2025]
- The dangers of censorship: The harm of book banning - Collegiate Times - April 1st, 2025 [April 1st, 2025]
- Can Controversy and Censorship Ever Be Good for Artists and Their Art? - observer.com - April 1st, 2025 [April 1st, 2025]
- Why is X suing the Indian govt over censorship? Musks heft within US administration could play a part - The Straits Times - April 1st, 2025 [April 1st, 2025]
- Explained: What is the Sahyog Portal that X has called out for censorship? - MediaNama - April 1st, 2025 [April 1st, 2025]
- Censorship and the question of artistic freedom - Times of India - April 1st, 2025 [April 1st, 2025]
- Art Censorship: Between Restriction and Sharpening Idea of Freedom of Expression - Universitas Gadjah Mada - April 1st, 2025 [April 1st, 2025]
- Mass surveillance and censorship/ What is DPI, intended for use by the government? - cna.al - April 1st, 2025 [April 1st, 2025]
- The Freckled Face of Censorship or How Book Bans Are Restricting Our Freedoms - U.S. News & World Report - March 26th, 2025 [March 26th, 2025]
- Spice Girls latest victims of woke censorship as iconic '90s song has 'offensive' lyric removed by BBC and other stations - GB News - March 26th, 2025 [March 26th, 2025]
- MEDIA ADVISORY: HFAC Subcommittee Hearing on the Censorship-Industrial Complex - House Foreign Affairs Committee - March 26th, 2025 [March 26th, 2025]
- Durbin Questions Witnesses In Judiciary Subcommittee Hearing On Censorship - RiverBender.com - March 26th, 2025 [March 26th, 2025]
- Hawley Exposes Big Tech as Willing Collaborators in Censorship: They Own It - Josh Hawley - March 26th, 2025 [March 26th, 2025]
- Scientists Respond to FTC Inquiry into Tech Censorship - R Street - March 26th, 2025 [March 26th, 2025]
- Venice Title Pooja, Sir: Rajagunj Released in Nepal After Extensive Censorship Battle: An Attack on the Fundamental Right to Freedom of Speech... - March 26th, 2025 [March 26th, 2025]
- 'Assault on the 1st Amendment': Expert buries Trumps 'censorship' argument in 60 seconds - AlterNet - March 26th, 2025 [March 26th, 2025]
- Billboard Chris fined, threatened with arrest in Brisbane days ahead of ultimate court challenge against government online censorship - ADF... - March 26th, 2025 [March 26th, 2025]
- Exclusive - Laughter Chefs 2's Rahul Vaidya on current scenario of comedy in India and Samay Raina; says - The Times of India - March 26th, 2025 [March 26th, 2025]
- Banned books of Alabama. These 25 face censorship in local libraries throughout AL - Montgomery Advertiser - March 26th, 2025 [March 26th, 2025]
- Beauty and the Beast: New book sparks censorship row in France - BBC.com - March 25th, 2025 [March 25th, 2025]
- Opinion: The day free speech began to retreat - The Globe and Mail - March 25th, 2025 [March 25th, 2025]
- CT library meeting on censoring LGBTQ+ content canceled after large crowd shows up - Hartford Courant - March 25th, 2025 [March 25th, 2025]
- Local leaders in Suffield accused of censorship following proposed library policy - Eyewitness News 3 - March 25th, 2025 [March 25th, 2025]
- USAID Coordinated With Censorship Agency, Documents Show - Daily Signal - March 25th, 2025 [March 25th, 2025]
- The EU wants to censor the global internet - Spiked - March 25th, 2025 [March 25th, 2025]
- Federal Governments Growing Banned Words List Is Chilling Act of Censorship - PEN America - March 25th, 2025 [March 25th, 2025]
- United States of Censorship - Marist College The Circle - March 25th, 2025 [March 25th, 2025]
- America First Legal Exposes Censorship Scheme by USAID and Global Engagement Center, Working With UK Government and Media Firms, to Use AI Censorship... - March 25th, 2025 [March 25th, 2025]
- Liberal Documentarians Panic as Industry Goes Trump-Friendly, but Conservatives Say Theyre Getting a Taste of Censorship and Its Satisfying - Variety - March 25th, 2025 [March 25th, 2025]
- OPINION | Censoring 'No Other Land' won't make the issue go away - The Jewish News of Northern California - March 25th, 2025 [March 25th, 2025]
- Miami Beach mayors censorship of No Other Land is yet another authoritarian move to shield Israel - Mondoweiss - March 25th, 2025 [March 25th, 2025]
- Elon Musks X sues union government over alleged censorship and IT Act violations - The Hindu - March 25th, 2025 [March 25th, 2025]
- Cartoonist accuses French Education Ministry of censorship for canceling his 'Beauty and the Beast' - Le Monde - March 25th, 2025 [March 25th, 2025]
- What are anti-censorship features and how is Proton VPN leading the way? - Tom's Guide - March 25th, 2025 [March 25th, 2025]
- Local opinion: Banning bones and books - Arizona Daily Star - March 25th, 2025 [March 25th, 2025]
- Coalition led by PEN Florida lobbies in Tallahassee to undo the harms of censorship - PEN America - March 25th, 2025 [March 25th, 2025]
- Beauty and the Beast comic book cancelled in France's 'worst ever censorship case' as 'inappropriate' Belle depicted as dark-skinned Mediterranean... - March 25th, 2025 [March 25th, 2025]
- Former Meta director says Mark Zuckerberg worked hand in glove with Beijing to build a censorship tool - Fortune - March 13th, 2025 [March 13th, 2025]
- RI Voices: Censorship harms those we should be trying to protect - The Boston Globe - March 13th, 2025 [March 13th, 2025]
- Opinion | Think Twice Before Using These Words - The New York Times - March 13th, 2025 [March 13th, 2025]
- World Day Against Cyber Censorship: RSF Collateral Freedom project restores access to BBC News in countries where it is blocked - Reporters sans... - March 13th, 2025 [March 13th, 2025]
- FCC To Investigate Alleged Faith-Based Discrimination at YouTube TV as It Ramps Up War on the Censorship Cartel - The New York Sun - March 13th, 2025 [March 13th, 2025]
- DW defies censorship with innovative solutions - DW - March 13th, 2025 [March 13th, 2025]
- Florida Coalition to Speak Out March 11 in Support of Freedom to Learn Act to Reverse Harmful Censorship in Public Schools - PEN America - March 13th, 2025 [March 13th, 2025]
- Mark Zuckerberg Offered China Full Censorship Control And User Data Access, Says Meta Whistleblower: 'Working Hand In Glove With The Chinese Communist... - March 13th, 2025 [March 13th, 2025]
- Censorship at heart of FST's 'Bad Books' - Yoursun.com - March 13th, 2025 [March 13th, 2025]
- Interview: Tackling Censorship and Artistic Freedom - Everything Theatre - March 13th, 2025 [March 13th, 2025]
- Censorship and Australias Venice Biennale pavilion, a controversial AI auction, and Elizabeth Catlett in Washingtonpodcast - Art Newspaper - March 13th, 2025 [March 13th, 2025]
- Trumps censorship Czar orders NPR and PBS investigation - MR Online - March 13th, 2025 [March 13th, 2025]
- Meta Is All About Free SpeechExcept They Built a Censorship Tool for China - VICE - March 13th, 2025 [March 13th, 2025]
- Huntington Beach residents will vote on book censorship, library control in June - LAist - March 7th, 2025 [March 7th, 2025]
- Trump Calls On Congress To Pass The Take It Down ActSo He Can Censor His Critics - EFF - March 7th, 2025 [March 7th, 2025]
- Turning the Page on Literary Censorship in the US - SUNY The New Paltz Oracle - March 7th, 2025 [March 7th, 2025]
- Escalating violent conflict in eastern DRC: journalists and HRDs targeted; censorship and internet cuts - Civicus - March 7th, 2025 [March 7th, 2025]
- This World Book Day, lets fight for the freedom to read - Index on Censorship - March 7th, 2025 [March 7th, 2025]
- RI 'Freedom to Read' bill would protect librarians from censorship prosecution. What to know. - The Providence Journal - March 7th, 2025 [March 7th, 2025]
- NCAC Expressed Deep Concern Over DOEs Recent Dear Colleague Letter on Race and Teaching Practices - Blogging Censorship - March 7th, 2025 [March 7th, 2025]
- The ACLU of Delaware urging colleges across the state to reject Trumps censorship policy - WMDT - March 7th, 2025 [March 7th, 2025]
- French University to Fund American Scientists Who Fear Trump Censorship - 404 Media - March 7th, 2025 [March 7th, 2025]
- How nationwide book banning, censorship are impacting students and libraries across the country - The Panther Newspaper - March 7th, 2025 [March 7th, 2025]
- Increased TikTok Censorship Under the Trump Administration? - The Pioneer - March 7th, 2025 [March 7th, 2025]
- Ormond Beach citizens push back against 'censorship' of mayor, commissioners work to put issue to rest - Palm Coast Observer and Ormond Beach Observer - March 7th, 2025 [March 7th, 2025]
- Journalisms Resistance: Reporting Beyond Censorship - Word In Black - March 7th, 2025 [March 7th, 2025]
- Solo Leveling's Censorship Is Quickly Becoming a Massive Problem for the Anime - CBR - March 7th, 2025 [March 7th, 2025]
- Jim Jordan Demands Alphabet Hand Over Docs Citing Evidence That Youtube 'Coerced And Colluded' With Biden Admin - LatinTimes - March 7th, 2025 [March 7th, 2025]
- Sandeep Reddy Vanga reacts to criticism on violence in his films: 'The censor officer told me not to worr - TOI Etimes - March 3rd, 2025 [March 3rd, 2025]
- Baroness Bertin's porn review: 'This isn't me driving a tank onto the lawn of censorship' - PoliticsHome - March 3rd, 2025 [March 3rd, 2025]
- Freedom forgone: The concerning rise of censorship in Israel - comment - The Jerusalem Post - March 3rd, 2025 [March 3rd, 2025]
- Jerry Moore: The Gulf of Censorship - NNY360 - March 3rd, 2025 [March 3rd, 2025]
- House Judiciary Committee subpoenas Alphabet, Meta, other tech giants over 'foreign censorship' of speech - CNBC - March 1st, 2025 [March 1st, 2025]
- Hunter Biden, Covid, and censorship? Fired reporter Catherine Herridges explosive CBS revelations: Atta - The Times of India - March 1st, 2025 [March 1st, 2025]
- 'Craven. He's Fearful of Trump': Marty Baron Slams Jeff Bezos' Censorship of Post Opinion Section - Zeteo - March 1st, 2025 [March 1st, 2025]
- 'Free speech is dying!' British nationals told they could be BANNED or DEPORTED from US amid censorship row - GB News - March 1st, 2025 [March 1st, 2025]
- Seven things to know about the student press - Poynter - March 1st, 2025 [March 1st, 2025]
- Child protection or censorship? The legal battle between the Court of Justice of the EU and Hungary - Euronews - March 1st, 2025 [March 1st, 2025]
- Matt Taibbi: The Collapse of the Censorship Regime - Reason - March 1st, 2025 [March 1st, 2025]
- Community Group and Huntington Beach Residents Sue City Over Library Censorship - ACLU of Southern California - March 1st, 2025 [March 1st, 2025]
- Book Bans in Schools Sweep Across Reading Levels, Genres and Topics, While Censorship Erases Stories about People of Color and LGBTQ Topics Most Often... - March 1st, 2025 [March 1st, 2025]
- House Judiciary Committee subpoenas tech platforms over foreign censorship of Americans - Washington Times - March 1st, 2025 [March 1st, 2025]
- MAGA on a writing spree to protect tech from censorship - EURACTIV - March 1st, 2025 [March 1st, 2025]