Govt says fact-check body to curb misinformation, critics allege censorship – The Indian Express
It all started in January this year, when, out of the blue, a completely new and unrelated clause was added as a postscript to the draft online gaming rules. The clause proposed that the Centres Press Information Bureau can flag and instruct online intermediaries if a piece of information online relating to the government was deemed as fake. Intermediaries would then have to act and take it down.
On Thursday, that proposal was notified by the Ministry of Electronics and IT. Though the reference to the PIB was removed in the final rules, with the government saying it will notify a fact-check unit, the spirit of the legislation remained the same.
As a consequence, online intermediaries social media platforms like Facebook, YouTube and internet service providers like Airtel and Jio will be faced to make a key decision: whether to abide by the government fact-check units version of the truth and take down any content the unit labels as fake, or decide not to take the content down and risk facing litigation.
While the government is billing it as an important measure to curb some amount of misinformation on the Internet, critics are calling it a tool to widen the scope of online censorship in the country, asking the Centre to withdraw them.
Experts believe that the rules could potentially impact a range of stakeholders, including opposition political parties and journalists. Unsurprisingly, the Congress and several other Opposition parties, including the TMC, RJD and CPI(M), have come down heavily on the government over its decision. So have digital rights activists and press associations like the Editors Guild of India, which has called the rules draconian.
Studies have shown that misinformation is a big issue on every major social media platform. In many cases, it is the content that most often goes viral on these sites, thanks to their own algorithms, and users with varying motivations who share such information. But, these platforms have also become an important tool for people particularly from marginalised groups to exercise their right to free speech.
Minister of State for Electronics and IT Rajeev Chandrasekhar has assured that the government-backed fact check body will work in a credible way, in a bid to address the concerns. When we notify the agency, we will certainly be very clear that any doubts in the mind of people that the power will be misused on behalf of the government will be addressed when we notify the agency. There will be a list of dos and donts that it will have to adhere to, he earlier told The Indian Express.
Unfortunately, there is a high probability that this will be used to suppress free speech and stifle criticism of the Union government, and its policies. This may happen today, tomorrow, or ten years in the future, but once there are rules/laws which can be misused, selectively enforced, they will, Prateek Waghre, policy director at the Internet Freedom Foundation told The Indian Express.
The issue at hand is complex. To break it down, it is first important to understand what these rules are not: these fresh amendments do not give the Centre direct powers to order content takedowns. It already enjoys that authority and exercises it frequently under Section 69 (A) of the IT Act, 2000.
However, what the rules say is that intermediaries will have to make reasonable efforts to not host content that will be marked as fake or false or misleading by the governments to-be-notified fact-check unit if they wish to retain their safe harbour, which is legal immunity from third-party content.
The question that arises then is if social media companies will exercise their agency to decide whether they should let a piece of content labelled fake by the government on their platform. If they do, they could lose safe harbour and attract a lawsuit; and if they dont, they will become party to a censorship exercise.
In plain English, it means that if they choose to continue hosting the content despite it being labelled as misleading, they will lose their safe harbour, which would open an option for the government to take them to court, an option that was previously unavailable. Digital rights experts believe that social media companies will err on the side of caution.
Namrata Maheshwari, Asia Pacific policy counsel for the global rights body Access Now said that if platforms have to make the choice between removing content flagged by the government, and being taken to court, they are most likely to choose the former. Litigation, and potentially several cases in multiple courts, would simply be too resource-intensive and high-risk. For its part, the government has tried to circumvent the concerns by saying that the fact-check body will follow a list of d0s and donts and adhere to standards of fact-checking. The standards, however, are currently not known.
There is also a concern around the government changing course on different provisions in the same law. Earlier this year, it established three committees that would hear appeals filed by users of social media companies if they feel that their grievances have not been satisfactorily dealt with by the companies officials.
The idea here was that not everyone might have the option to go to court to challenge content moderation decisions taken by platforms, and hence there needs to be a forum which can offer an additional avenue of recourse to users. But the new rules point to a dichotomy. For government-branded misleading content that has been taken down by a platform, the entity or person who posted it will have no option but to go to court should she decide to appeal the result. There is no in-between.
If a court challenge is the only recourse available to aggrieved parties, then the net result of this amendment is that it has given the government a shortcut to take content down, while increasing the burden on potentially aggrieved parties, Waghre said.
The overarching question around the new rules is if the government should, and can, be the judge, jury and executioner. The governments argument is that since the rules concern misinformation around businesses of the Centre, it is the most well placed to take a call on content that relates to it, since only it has the right data to prove its case.
Critics have, however, pointed to a potential conflict of interest that might arise when a government-appointed body has the final say in information directly related to the government. The independence of the body had been called into question.
for a fact-checking setup to be credible, it must be independent, possess the necessary capacity (technical, journalistic, etc.) to verify information, have an established track-record, and most importantly, not have a conflict of interest about the accuracy of the content it is supposed to vet, Waghre said.
The claim that only the government has the data to prove whether information about it is true or false reflects the need for it to be more open, transparent, objective in its own assessments about its performance so that these determinations can be made independently, he added.
Read more:
Govt says fact-check body to curb misinformation, critics allege censorship - The Indian Express
- Trumps aggressive actions against free speech speak a lot louder than his words defending it - The Conversation - April 25th, 2025 [April 25th, 2025]
- Bowen Yang Rants About SNL Censors: This Is the Real World - The Daily Beast - April 25th, 2025 [April 25th, 2025]
- Government censorship comes to Bluesky, but not its third-party apps yet - TechCrunch - April 25th, 2025 [April 25th, 2025]
- Time to re-read The Masses, the 1910s literary magazine crushed by government censorship. - Literary Hub - April 25th, 2025 [April 25th, 2025]
- Operation Caged Bird Seeks to Unban Books from Naval Academy: Book Censorship News, April 25, 2025 - Book Riot - April 25th, 2025 [April 25th, 2025]
- 12 Moments Of Anime Censorship That Became Bizarrely Hilarious - SlashFilm - April 25th, 2025 [April 25th, 2025]
- I faced censorship and attacks at MIT for trying to teach about Palestine. This reflects the rising fascism in higher education. - Mondoweiss - April 25th, 2025 [April 25th, 2025]
- Opinion | The Naval Academy Canceled My Lecture on Wisdom - The New York Times - April 25th, 2025 [April 25th, 2025]
- University suspects big tech Google and Meta censoring ads just because its Catholic - The College Fix - April 25th, 2025 [April 25th, 2025]
- Netflix Co-CEO Says Theyre Not in China Because Not a Single Episode Cleared the Censorship Board - IndieWire - April 25th, 2025 [April 25th, 2025]
- Republicans, beware: Censorship by the right is no better than by the left | Opinion - USA Today - April 25th, 2025 [April 25th, 2025]
- DITV: YAF Brings in CEO of Babylon Bee to Speak About Censorship - The Daily Iowan - April 25th, 2025 [April 25th, 2025]
- There are medieval roots to modern attempts to censor controversial literature - KJZZ - April 25th, 2025 [April 25th, 2025]
- Barbra Streisand can tell you: Censorship is not the answer - The Frederick News-Post - April 25th, 2025 [April 25th, 2025]
- Meta Oversight Board Fumes As Facebook Ends Censorship Initiatives - The Daily Wire - April 25th, 2025 [April 25th, 2025]
- Bluesky Just Bowed to Censorship Demands in Turkey, but Theres a Loophole - Gizmodo - April 25th, 2025 [April 25th, 2025]
- Censorship is getting louder: Metas fine is just the echo - Pearls and Irritations - April 25th, 2025 [April 25th, 2025]
- Trump Administration Blasts Biden, Fauci for Outright Censorship on Revamped Covid-19 Website - Yahoo - April 21st, 2025 [April 21st, 2025]
- Book censorship: Why its not going to stop with the books, no matter how you spin it - DMNews - April 21st, 2025 [April 21st, 2025]
- Wall Streets silent protest: censorship in the age of Trump - The Irish Times - April 21st, 2025 [April 21st, 2025]
- Digital Blasphemy: Netflixs Controverial Censorship of Mel Gibsons The Passion for Easter - Bleeding Fool - April 21st, 2025 [April 21st, 2025]
- Censorship in STEM: A Recap of the Heterodox Academy STEM Community Meeting at USC April 24 - University of Nevada, Las Vegas | UNLV - April 21st, 2025 [April 21st, 2025]
- Top Ultra-processed Foods Researcher at NIH Resigns, Citing Censorship - Civil Eats - April 21st, 2025 [April 21st, 2025]
- Trump-style book censorship is spreading just ask British librarians | Alison Hicks - The Guardian - April 21st, 2025 [April 21st, 2025]
- Why would he take such a risk? How a famous Chinese author befriended his censor - The Guardian - April 21st, 2025 [April 21st, 2025]
- Grandpas advice for the new wave of American censors - FIRE | Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression - April 21st, 2025 [April 21st, 2025]
- Trump admin accused of censoring NIHs top expert on ultra-processed foods - Ars Technica - April 21st, 2025 [April 21st, 2025]
- 100 mph speeders, 4/20 sales, RI lobbyist expenses, RISD censorship: Top stories this week - The Providence Journal - April 21st, 2025 [April 21st, 2025]
- 'Wuthering Waves' Developer Responds to Backlash Over Censorship - The Gooner Rage is Real - VICE - April 21st, 2025 [April 21st, 2025]
- State Department shuts down agency that pushed censorship of conservative news sites - Must Read Alaska - April 21st, 2025 [April 21st, 2025]
- DrainMore Than FightAuthoritarianism and Censorship - The Fulcrum - April 21st, 2025 [April 21st, 2025]
- Theyre Coming For Us: Media Censorship in the Age of Palestinian Genocide - Counterpunch - April 21st, 2025 [April 21st, 2025]
- Censorship or Caution? The ACSA's Gaza Journal Controversy Exposes a Field at War With Itself - Architect Magazine - April 21st, 2025 [April 21st, 2025]
- Why deregulating online platforms is actually bad for free speech - The Conversation - April 21st, 2025 [April 21st, 2025]
- We Took on Book Bans in Our Small Conservative Community and Won - Teen Vogue - April 21st, 2025 [April 21st, 2025]
- MAJOR VICTORY Trump Administration Declassifies the Biden Administrations Secret Domestic Surveillance and Censorship Strategy, Following AFLs... - April 21st, 2025 [April 21st, 2025]
- Banned Books and Censorship: Who Gets to Decide What We Read? - The Teen Magazine - April 21st, 2025 [April 21st, 2025]
- Nina Jankowiczs censorship bull, onshoring risks are manageable and other commentary - New York Post - April 5th, 2025 [April 5th, 2025]
- Opinion: If US schools are censored, students will struggle to form their own opinions - The Asheville Citizen Times - April 5th, 2025 [April 5th, 2025]
- Lonely Island surprised 'Jizz in My Pants' wasn't censored on SNL : 'There's still potentially kids watching' - Entertainment Weekly - April 5th, 2025 [April 5th, 2025]
- Censoring Santosh and the grim truth of police torture - Hindustan Times - April 5th, 2025 [April 5th, 2025]
- The Antitrust Division Hosts a Big-Tech Censorship Forum - Department of Justice (.gov) - April 5th, 2025 [April 5th, 2025]
- Is the future of censorship-resistant VPNs, no VPNs? - TechRadar - April 5th, 2025 [April 5th, 2025]
- The VPN industry must change or face losing the battle against censorship - Tom's Guide - April 5th, 2025 [April 5th, 2025]
- DOJ, FTC listen to Big Tech censorship concerns - Global Competition Review - April 5th, 2025 [April 5th, 2025]
- CIF Becomes the Official Sponsor of Dirty Mouths, turning censorship into sponsorship. - Marketing Communication News - April 5th, 2025 [April 5th, 2025]
- India quietly censored a White Lotus Season 3 scene; even HBO didnt see this coming - The Indian Express - April 5th, 2025 [April 5th, 2025]
- Journalists in Haiti defy bullets and censorship to cover unprecedented violence - The Independent - April 5th, 2025 [April 5th, 2025]
- CEO of Babylon Bee visits campus, gives talk about dangers of censorship - The Crimson White - April 5th, 2025 [April 5th, 2025]
- One White Lotus Scene Was Conspicuously Missing in India, and Its Part of a Bigger Censorship Issue - IndieWire - April 3rd, 2025 [April 3rd, 2025]
- Australian tribunal to rule on whether using biologically accurate pronouns online is grounds for censorship - Alliance Defending Freedom... - April 3rd, 2025 [April 3rd, 2025]
- Its About Censorship, Erasure, and Control: the GOPs Push for Parental Rights - The Texas Observer - April 3rd, 2025 [April 3rd, 2025]
- Mastercard agrees to eschew pressure to engage in censorship of ads - adfmedia.org - April 3rd, 2025 [April 3rd, 2025]
- 'Stories About Overthrowing the Government Are No Longer Allowed': Anime Censorship Overseas Adding to Broadcast Woes - Comic Book Resources - April 3rd, 2025 [April 3rd, 2025]
- Media apathy makes Schmitts hearing on government censorship all the more vital - Read Lion - April 3rd, 2025 [April 3rd, 2025]
- Mastercard, Facing Pressure Over Role In Global Censorship Effort, Agrees To Major Change - The Daily Wire - April 3rd, 2025 [April 3rd, 2025]
- Launch: New OONI Explorer thematic censorship pages - Open Observatory of Network Interference | OONI - April 3rd, 2025 [April 3rd, 2025]
- Jersey City Library Set to Welcome 'The Hammer' to Talk on Censorship, Book Bans - TAPinto - April 3rd, 2025 [April 3rd, 2025]
- Anime Is Booming, But New Censorship Rules Are About to Threaten Some of Its Top Shows - Screen Rant - April 3rd, 2025 [April 3rd, 2025]
- Twitter Files journalist Matt Taibbi spars with Bidens disinfo czar in censorship hearing: We dont need a truth squad - New York Post - April 3rd, 2025 [April 3rd, 2025]
- From censorship to curiosity: Pope Francis appreciation for the power of history and books - The Conversation - April 3rd, 2025 [April 3rd, 2025]
- Oppenheimer Now Streaming Uncensored on Netflix in India After Theatrical Censorship - IGN India - April 3rd, 2025 [April 3rd, 2025]
- What is Sahyog, which Elon Musk-owned X called a censorship portal? - The Indian Express - April 3rd, 2025 [April 3rd, 2025]
- Mark Zuckerberg-Led Meta Set To Face 'Truth' At Senate Hearing Over China Operations And Communist Party Censorship Efforts - Meta Platforms... - April 3rd, 2025 [April 3rd, 2025]
- Sharyn Rothstein looks at censorship through the eyes of a badass librarian - DC Theater Arts - April 1st, 2025 [April 1st, 2025]
- The dangers of censorship: The harm of book banning - Collegiate Times - April 1st, 2025 [April 1st, 2025]
- Can Controversy and Censorship Ever Be Good for Artists and Their Art? - observer.com - April 1st, 2025 [April 1st, 2025]
- Why is X suing the Indian govt over censorship? Musks heft within US administration could play a part - The Straits Times - April 1st, 2025 [April 1st, 2025]
- Explained: What is the Sahyog Portal that X has called out for censorship? - MediaNama - April 1st, 2025 [April 1st, 2025]
- Censorship and the question of artistic freedom - Times of India - April 1st, 2025 [April 1st, 2025]
- Art Censorship: Between Restriction and Sharpening Idea of Freedom of Expression - Universitas Gadjah Mada - April 1st, 2025 [April 1st, 2025]
- Mass surveillance and censorship/ What is DPI, intended for use by the government? - cna.al - April 1st, 2025 [April 1st, 2025]
- The Freckled Face of Censorship or How Book Bans Are Restricting Our Freedoms - U.S. News & World Report - March 26th, 2025 [March 26th, 2025]
- Spice Girls latest victims of woke censorship as iconic '90s song has 'offensive' lyric removed by BBC and other stations - GB News - March 26th, 2025 [March 26th, 2025]
- MEDIA ADVISORY: HFAC Subcommittee Hearing on the Censorship-Industrial Complex - House Foreign Affairs Committee - March 26th, 2025 [March 26th, 2025]
- Durbin Questions Witnesses In Judiciary Subcommittee Hearing On Censorship - RiverBender.com - March 26th, 2025 [March 26th, 2025]
- Hawley Exposes Big Tech as Willing Collaborators in Censorship: They Own It - Josh Hawley - March 26th, 2025 [March 26th, 2025]
- Scientists Respond to FTC Inquiry into Tech Censorship - R Street - March 26th, 2025 [March 26th, 2025]
- Venice Title Pooja, Sir: Rajagunj Released in Nepal After Extensive Censorship Battle: An Attack on the Fundamental Right to Freedom of Speech... - March 26th, 2025 [March 26th, 2025]
- 'Assault on the 1st Amendment': Expert buries Trumps 'censorship' argument in 60 seconds - AlterNet - March 26th, 2025 [March 26th, 2025]