Unchecked Big Tech Censorship is a Serious Problem – Drexel University The Triangle Online
PHILADELPHIA, PA Freedom of expression is among the most important civil liberties enjoyed by members of a free society. By allowing these members to question authority, freedom of expression enables a community to check itself, to make sure that the ship is pointed in the right direction and to course-correct if needed. Not only is it vital for maintaining a healthy diversity of views and opinions, but it also allows peopleincluding journaliststo stand in the public square and share ideas and information with their fellow citizens.
Over the past year, and particularly over the past several months, we have seen more and more instances of major tech companies suppressing peoples speech through censorship, eroding their ability to express themselves by revoking access to this public square.
For example, mid-October, Twitter and Facebook coordinated a campaign to censor a New York Post article that exposed emails obtained from a laptop allegedly belonging to Hunter Biden, President Joe Bidens son. The two companies took steps to limit the spread of the story by warning users that the article may contain unsafe material and locking the Post out of its own Twitter account.
Regardless of whether the article which thus far has not been debunked, and parts of which have been corroborated contains truly critical information or not, it was (and may still be) an important and legitimate news story. For Twitter and Facebook to try to shut down the story in the run-up to a major presidential election was grossly irresponsible, and it shows a concerning willingness to silence journalists in the name of safety.
During a Senate hearing on censorship involving Facebook, Google and Twitter in late October, it was revealed that Google had been suppressing content from the World Socialist Website in its search results. The revelation backs up a 2019 Wall Street Journal investigation that detailed the use of algorithms by Google to alter users search results. It also reconfirms suspicions that the tech giant has been effectively censoring WSWS articlessuch as its critical coverage of the New York Times 1619 Projectdating as far back as 2017.
While using algorithms to dictate search results may make search engines more efficient and convenient for users, it also makes it much easier to manipulate results so that they suppress certain viewpoints or information. If people who rely heavily on the Internet for news or research (as, I assume, most of us do) are only exposed to select viewpoints and publications, it is far more difficult to determine facts and gain a well-rounded understanding of the world we live in.
In another instance, YouTube announced in December that it would begin removing videos and accounts of users claiming that there was widespread election fraud in the 2020 presidential election and questioning the results.
It is highly unlikely that the election was stolen, and the lawsuits (pushed by both Donald Trump and his allies) to overturn the results have flopped. However, YouTubes decision to block this content limits users ability to assess the information presented and decide for themselves what they believe, in addition to further entrenching the beliefs of those convinced the election was stolen.
In the United States, free speech is often referenced in tandem with the First Amendment, which guarantees American citizens the right to freedom of religion, expression, assembly and petition by preventing Congress from restricting any one of these actions in public forums. But freedom of speech is more than just a law as defined under the First Amendment; it is a core tenet of liberal philosophy that promotes the right of the individual to access the public square of discourse. It is an important part of individual freedom and is invaluable in ensuring that the groups that hold the most power, be they governments or trillion-dollar industries, cannot control the discourse of their constituents.
A handful of private tech companies hold an ever-growing monopoly over the internet and social media, which have become the new public square in our society; the increasing normalization of political censorship by these organizations is a problem. Its true that the millions of people who share this public square should not and cannot be forced to listen to the ramblings of any yahoo standing on a soapbox, but to take away someones voice for the crime of sharing information that may be politically inconvenient, expressing views that may be controversial, or for simply being wrong only encourages more authoritarian behavior.
One might argue that if someone doesnt like the speech policies of one social media network or another, they can simply move to another or create their own. This is true, and that is exactly what happened earlier this year. Parler, a social network founded for the purpose of promoting freedom of expression, briefly became the most downloaded app in the country, with users jumping ship from Twitter and Facebook citing claims of censorship following Bidens presidential victory.
This was short-lived, though, as Parler was quickly booted from the internet after being removed from Apple and Googles app stores, as well as from Amazon Web Services, for a lack of moderation regarding content promoting the violent riots at the Capitol Building on Jan. 6. In contrast, similar content was also spreading across significantly larger networks, such as Twitter and Facebook, for weeks leading up to the Electoral College vote, but they faced no such action. Parler is now back online since striking a new deal with the Russian-owned DDos-Guard, after having spent a week struggling to find a new host.
So yes, you can jump to other social networks or even form your own if you disagree with the speech policies set by the largest companies in the world. But if your network does not abide by the standards of content moderation set by those companies, it runs the risk of being shut down. This is not to say that it is unreasonable to make content encouraging violence against your guidelines. But so long as the content is not illegal, a platform should not be faced with a dogpile of tech giants for choosing to let its users speak their minds.
That said, the pressure to conform with certain speech policies and standards of moderation does not come from tech companies exclusively. During congressional antitrust hearings on the tech monopolies held by Amazon, Apple, Google and Facebook, some U.S. senators argued for social media companies to be even more aggressive in taking down posts. Threats of litigation can be leveraged against tech companies by the government, encouraging them to pursue policies that may be preferred by certain officials or agencies.
So, is there anything that can actually be done to combat political censorship by tech companies? Maybe. The largest legal protections that tech companies have are those provided under the Communications Decency Act Section 230:
No provider or user of an interactive computer service shall be treated as the publisher or speaker of any information provided by another information content provider.
In a nutshell, this means that tech companies cannot be held liable for the actions of their users, i.e. you cannot sue Twitter for slander based on the statements made by Twitter user @FakeName37.
By and large, this is a good thing. A social media company that acts as a service provider should not be held responsible for the independent actions of its users. However, there is an argument to be made that companies such as Twitter, Facebook or Google by choosing to take responsibility for the speech of their users out of concern for things like disinformation in the cases of the New York Post or election fraud conspiracy theorists have now invalidated those protections. By deciding that certain kinds of political speech are not acceptable, they have effectively become publishers of content as opposed to simply service providers.
This is where the road starts to get a bit rocky. As I stated, it is very possible for the federal government to use threats of litigation as a way for tech companies to pursue policies it finds favorable. In early 2020, I wrote about one such case: the EARN IT Act, proposed legislation that would have threatened to remove Section 230 protections if tech companies did not sacrifice user data encryption and potentially even send all user messages to law enforcement agencies to be scanned for child sex abuse material. If Section 230 protections were to be revoked, this could still open a pathway to more authoritarian speech controls.
I stand by my opposition to the EARN IT Act for its intent to undermine end-to-end data encryption. However, with the increasingly apparent authoritarian censorship by tech companies (particularly in the past year), something may need to be done to preserve individuals freedom of political expression. Taking a good hard look at exactly who should be protected under Section 230 could be one solution, albeit a risky one.
According to the current interpretation of Section 230, companies like Google, Twitter and Facebook are protected from the threat of mass litigation by their users. But to allow tech companies to continue to abuse their monopolies over the public square of discourse unchecked is a serious mistake and one that needs to be addressed. If faced with no other option, rethinking Section 230 protections may just be a risk worth taking.
Read more here:
Unchecked Big Tech Censorship is a Serious Problem - Drexel University The Triangle Online
- Censorship accusations loom over Big Tech hearing on election threats - The Verge - September 21st, 2024 [September 21st, 2024]
- Brooklyn Public Library leads charge against book censorship with events and national day of action - Brooklyn Paper - September 21st, 2024 [September 21st, 2024]
- Ending Censorship, Forever Wars, and Chronic Disease: A Transcript of Robert F. Kennedy, Jr.s August 23, 2024 Speech Endorsing Former President Donald... - September 21st, 2024 [September 21st, 2024]
- Examining whether a U.S. ban on TikTok would be censorship - KUOW News and Information - September 21st, 2024 [September 21st, 2024]
- Banned book give-away planned in central Iowa this weekend - Radio Iowa - September 21st, 2024 [September 21st, 2024]
- Censorship everywhere in America - Elon Musk - News.Az - September 21st, 2024 [September 21st, 2024]
- Lifeline, Cash-Grab, Tool for Censorship: Three Incarcerated Readers on eBooks in Prison - Literary Hub - September 21st, 2024 [September 21st, 2024]
- TVUSD Board Presiding Officer Wiersma fights censorship from board members and staff over parental rights policy - Valley News - September 21st, 2024 [September 21st, 2024]
- Who holds the pen on scrutinising the most powerful? - Index on Censorship - September 21st, 2024 [September 21st, 2024]
- Swedish Professor: Disinformation Label Used To Limit Free Speech - The European Conservative - September 21st, 2024 [September 21st, 2024]
- This Technology Was Supposed to Help People in Prison. Its Backfiring in a Big Way. - Slate - September 19th, 2024 [September 19th, 2024]
- New data reveals exactly when the Chinese government blocked ChatGPT and other AI sites - Rest of World - September 19th, 2024 [September 19th, 2024]
- Hillary Clinton, queen of disinformation, issues two-faced call for censorship - New York Post - September 19th, 2024 [September 19th, 2024]
- Black authors speak ahead of Banned Book Week - Afro American Newspaper - September 19th, 2024 [September 19th, 2024]
- American Library Association to Host Historic Intellectual Freedom Summit at the Library of Congress - ala.org - September 19th, 2024 [September 19th, 2024]
- Why Im So Desperate for the Return of Microsoft Word to Our Prison Library - Slate - September 19th, 2024 [September 19th, 2024]
- Iranian filmmakers pull it out of the bag - Index on Censorship - September 19th, 2024 [September 19th, 2024]
- Opinion | Bureaucrat Who Threatened To Censor X Announces Resignation on X - The Wall Street Journal - September 19th, 2024 [September 19th, 2024]
- RFK Jr., Tulsi Gabbard blast Dems as 'warmongers,' 'party of censorship' while stumping for Trump in Arizona - New York Post - September 19th, 2024 [September 19th, 2024]
- Queens, Brooklyn and New York Public Libraries To Mark Banned Books Week September 22 to 28 with Talks, Exhibitions and More - City Life Org - September 19th, 2024 [September 19th, 2024]
- With A Spiking Crisis of School Book Bans, PEN America Draws Writers, Readers and Advocates Together to Champion the Freedom to Read; Events in Cities... - September 19th, 2024 [September 19th, 2024]
- Private Wires These companies are profiting off of censoring speech online - Big Brother Watch - September 19th, 2024 [September 19th, 2024]
- Government censorship is a greater threat than disinformation - New York Post - September 14th, 2024 [September 14th, 2024]
- EXCLUSIVE America First Legal Obtains New Internal CDC Documents Revealing Foreign Collusion in Biden-Harris Government Censorship Regime - America... - September 14th, 2024 [September 14th, 2024]
- We Called on the Oversight Board to Stop Censoring From the River to the Sea And They Listened - EFF - September 14th, 2024 [September 14th, 2024]
- Russia Invests $660 Million to Boost Internet Censorship and Block VPNs - CircleID - September 14th, 2024 [September 14th, 2024]
- NCLA Suit Demands End to Govt Censorship of Support Groups for Victims of Covid Vaccine Injuries - GlobeNewswire - September 14th, 2024 [September 14th, 2024]
- Banned Books Week educates about threat of censorship - Mid Florida Newspapers - September 14th, 2024 [September 14th, 2024]
- Media in Exile is Defeating Censorship in Cuba, Nicaragua, and Venezuela - Confidencial - September 14th, 2024 [September 14th, 2024]
- EXCLUSIVE: Open letter to Brazilian Congress demands an ended to censorship amid ongoing X ban - AOL - September 14th, 2024 [September 14th, 2024]
- 'We wanted 13PG': Zapiro shares the story behind the censorship battle of 'The Showerhead' - News24 - September 14th, 2024 [September 14th, 2024]
- Russia is willing to spend some $660 million to bolster internet censorship - TechSpot - September 14th, 2024 [September 14th, 2024]
- EXCLUSIVE: Open letter to Brazilian Congress demands an end to censorship amid ongoing X ban - Fox News - September 12th, 2024 [September 12th, 2024]
- Tracie D. Hall, the librarian speaking out against censorship and book bans that threaten learning and access to information - University of... - September 12th, 2024 [September 12th, 2024]
- Biden administration and Kamala Harris increase funding for digital censorship - Zenit.org - September 12th, 2024 [September 12th, 2024]
- Stand with the Banned Read-Out Promotes Awareness of Censorship - Town Topics - September 12th, 2024 [September 12th, 2024]
- America First Legal Launches Investigation into the Biden-Harris Administrations Knowledge of Social Media Censorship by Brazils Leftist Government -... - September 12th, 2024 [September 12th, 2024]
- The White House calls on Amazon and Google to help defeat online censors in these countries - Fast Company - September 12th, 2024 [September 12th, 2024]
- Up Late With The Apprentice Director Ali Abbasi: Censorship, Toothless Hollywood and Donald Trump | Exclusive - TheWrap - September 12th, 2024 [September 12th, 2024]
- Trump Proposes Anti-Censorship Order, Change to 25th Amendment at Wisconsin Rally - NTD - September 12th, 2024 [September 12th, 2024]
- Original Cowboy Bebop Gets One-of-a-Kind Inquiry Into '90s Network Censorship & More in New Release - CBR - September 12th, 2024 [September 12th, 2024]
- Key Takeaways from Zuckerbergs Tell-All - Daily Citizen - September 12th, 2024 [September 12th, 2024]
- Media Pretend That Systematic Government Censorship Is a Nothingburger - National Review - September 2nd, 2024 [September 2nd, 2024]
- Jack Dorsey Backs Bitcoin And Nostr To Cut Censorship With Free Speech - Forbes - September 2nd, 2024 [September 2nd, 2024]
- Half-Breed and Brown Sugar Vanished: Why Classic Artists Are Censoring Themselves - Rolling Stone - September 2nd, 2024 [September 2nd, 2024]
- We are in the middle of Europe, and we are under censorship, anti-Putin filmmaker says - Semafor - September 2nd, 2024 [September 2nd, 2024]
- Protecting Floridas children in the fight against censorship and the erosion of rights - Tallahassee Democrat - September 2nd, 2024 [September 2nd, 2024]
- Brazil's top judge gives X until Thursday evening to comply with order or face nationwide ban - Axios - September 2nd, 2024 [September 2nd, 2024]
- Durov, Musk, and Zuckerberg: Tech Oligarchs Cry Censorship and What It All Means - Just Security - September 2nd, 2024 [September 2nd, 2024]
- Zuckerberg regrets bowing to government pressure on Covid-19 censorship - ZAWYA - September 2nd, 2024 [September 2nd, 2024]
- Mark Zuckerbergs empty censorship apology: Letters to the Editor Aug. 30, 2024 - New York Post - September 2nd, 2024 [September 2nd, 2024]
- IC 814 controversy: Kangana Ranaut slams OTT platforms over censorship bias amid stalled release of her 'E - The Economic Times - September 2nd, 2024 [September 2nd, 2024]
- Meta CEO Zuckerberg admits he was part of the Biden-Harris censorship scheme. You've been warned, America - Fox News - September 2nd, 2024 [September 2nd, 2024]
- Opinion | European Censorship, Elon Musk and the Telegram Arrest - The Wall Street Journal - August 29th, 2024 [August 29th, 2024]
- Zuckerberg says Biden officials pressured Meta to censor content: What to know - The Hill - August 29th, 2024 [August 29th, 2024]
- Alex Berenson to amend suit against Biden, Pfizer after Zuckerberg admitted government pushed censorship - Fox News - August 29th, 2024 [August 29th, 2024]
- Zuckerberg's Biden-Harris censorship bombshell could be pivotal in First Amendment suit and more top headlines - Fox News - August 29th, 2024 [August 29th, 2024]
- Telegram And Youtube Censorship Show Bitcoin And Nostr Are Critical - Forbes - August 29th, 2024 [August 29th, 2024]
- Former Parler CEO reacts to news that Biden White House pressured Meta to censor Americans: 'Not surprising' - Fox Business - August 29th, 2024 [August 29th, 2024]
- Mark Zuckerberg Says Biden Administration Pressured Meta To Censor Covid Content, In Gift To House Republicans - Deadline - August 29th, 2024 [August 29th, 2024]
- Zuckerberg admits Biden admin pressured Facebook to censor COVID content, says it was wrong to suppress The Posts Hunter laptop coverage - New York... - August 29th, 2024 [August 29th, 2024]
- Yes, Mark Zuckerberg coming clean on Facebook censorship truly matters, as it cuts down Harris-Walz, experts claiming to fight misinformation - New... - August 29th, 2024 [August 29th, 2024]
- Tulsi Gabbard blasts champion of freedom Kamala Harris for her administrations record of censorship - Washington Examiner - August 29th, 2024 [August 29th, 2024]
- In case you were wondering if the U.S. Government engages in censorship by proxy, read Zuckerberg's letter - Gript - August 29th, 2024 [August 29th, 2024]
- Mark Zuckerberg says he regrets bowing to COVID-19 censorship pressure - Cointelegraph - August 29th, 2024 [August 29th, 2024]
- Tornado Cash Is One Step Away from Full Censorship (and a Solution) - hackernoon.com - August 29th, 2024 [August 29th, 2024]
- Mark Zuckerberg: Covid censorship was wrong and I wish Id fought it - The Telegraph - August 29th, 2024 [August 29th, 2024]
- Mark Zuckerberg exposes extent of the Biden censorship campaign to control social media - Washington Times - August 29th, 2024 [August 29th, 2024]
- Mark Zuckerberg needs to spill all on how FBI censored Americans - New York Post - August 29th, 2024 [August 29th, 2024]
- Zoya Akhtar on Censorship: 'Women Were Sexually Assaulted on Screen, But You Couldn't See a Kiss...' - News18 - August 29th, 2024 [August 29th, 2024]
- The science of Russian Internet censorship and surveillance - Meduza - August 25th, 2024 [August 25th, 2024]
- RFK Jr. cleared to take on Biden censorship after Supreme Court punted issue - Washington Examiner - August 25th, 2024 [August 25th, 2024]
- Bitter San Francisco Officials "Joyful" That X is Leaving City: Without Censorship, It's Just Not the Same! - WebProNews - August 25th, 2024 [August 25th, 2024]
- Slap in the face Israel Censors News of Damage from Hezbollah Attacks - Palestine Chronicle - August 25th, 2024 [August 25th, 2024]
- Leave It to Beaver Went to War with Network Censors to Show a Toilet on TV - Cracked.com - August 25th, 2024 [August 25th, 2024]
- RFK Jr.: '16 Months of Censorship' Led to Suspending Race - Newsmax - August 25th, 2024 [August 25th, 2024]
- Judge rules RFK Jr. can sue Biden administration over alleged censorship of charity that questions vaccines - MSN - August 25th, 2024 [August 25th, 2024]
- Why Project 2025 is a threat to a free media - Index on Censorship - August 25th, 2024 [August 25th, 2024]
- Are You Registered to Vote?: Book Censorship News, August 23, 2024 - Book Riot - August 25th, 2024 [August 25th, 2024]
- Censoring the Internet Wont Protect Kids - Reason - August 22nd, 2024 [August 22nd, 2024]