Opinion | How big should the House of Representatives be? Here’s the right size. – The Washington Post
Contributing columnist|AddFollow
March 28, 2023 at 8:52 a.m. EDT
Comment
We all know that democracy is about words and law, oratory and policy. But democracy is also about math. This is one of its most interesting features.
First, thats because you have to count the people. While many ancient societies counted people for taxation, we get the word census from the ancient Romans. Part of their government was based on a popular sovereignty principle. In addition to using the numbers for purposes of taxation, they also used the census to organize voters. The modern census appeared with the American invention of constitutional democracy and the constitutional requirement for a decennial census. It is now a fixture of modern political and policy administration. Over time, the census became the basis for much of the work in social statistics that provides the foundation for modern policymaking.
Democracy is also about math because you use math for decision-making. Which decisions will be decided by a simple majority vote by 50 percent plus one? Which will require a supermajority? And should that supermajority be a two-thirds or a three-quarters threshold?
The general idea is that you use a simple majority for matters of ordinary, passing and contingent concern. Supermajorities should be reserved for matters that rise to a constitutional level. (Here this, O ye Senate: Your filibuster does not accord with centuries of best practice in democratic design.)
And democracy is about math because of the principle of one person, one vote.
But even here matters can get complicated. For instance, humans arent spread out over geographical space in mathematically neat ways. The original design of the House of Representative aimed for a ratio of 30,000 constituents per representative. But state populations dont come in neat multiples of 30,000, or any other number. There is always a remainder, and what do you do with that? Round up and allocate an extra seat, or round down and increase the number of constituents per representative in that state?
Originally, using a rounding-down method, congressional districts had a ratio of constituents to representative ranging from 33,159 (New York) to 55,540 (Delaware), according to independent scholar Michael Rosin. This was the plan developed by Thomas Jefferson. Alexander Hamilton, rounding up, proposed a more representative plan with ratios ranging from 27,770 (Delaware) to 35,418 (Georgia). But the Jefferson approach won out. These plans were as close as the designers could get to 30,000 constituents per representative given population distribution.
Now, however, with the growing population and the House frozen at 435 seats, the spread runs from about 500,000 constituents for each of Rhode Island and Montanas members and 580,000 constituents for Wyomings single member, to 755,000 for each of Californias 52 representatives and 778,000 for each of Floridas 28.
As I explained in my previous column, the Founders never envisioned districts so large, and their gradual expansion over a century is a major reason our politics have become so dysfunctional.
To get our politics working again, we need a system that delivers energy (the ability for the government to get things done), republican safety (protection of our basic rights), popular sovereignty (adaptive responsiveness to the will of the people) and inclusion (all voices should be synthesized in the national voice of our House of Representatives). Real proximity of representatives to their constituents is necessary for delivering on all those design principles. For that, we need a bigger, and continuously growing, House of Representatives. We need smaller districts and fairer representation between more- and less-populous places.
But how big should the House be? That is also to ask how small should a district be. And based on what math? And on what principle of growth?
Scholars and advocates have been working on this question for decades. There are seven basic options, all compiled in a report on enlarging the House by the American Academy of Arts and Sciences commission on the state of our democracy, which I co-chaired. Those options would increase the size of Congress from 435 to between 572 to 9,400. They are as follows:
The Wyoming Rule. Peg the size of a district to the population of the least-populous state, which is currently Wyoming (with about 580,000 people). Thats 180,000 fewer constituents than todays average of 762,000 and would yield a House of 572 members. The difficulty with this rule, though, is that it could cause the number of members to fluctuate dramatically depending on the growth patterns of the smallest states. One way to address that would be to pick the current number (580,000) as a stable ratio going forward. But that would lead to speedy growth in the size of the House over time.
The Deferred Maintenance Rule. When the size of the House was capped in 1929, new seats could shift to growing areas only by taking them away from other areas. The number of seats lost by particular states since 1929 through this method is 149. If we restored those seats and added one more to keep the total an odd number, then reallocated to achieve even districts, we would have a new base of 585 seats. This method is clean and yields districts slightly smaller than the current population of Wyoming. However, we would still need to figure out a principle of growth under this method. Would we take district sizes after such a reform as the standard ratio, and simply let the House grow in relation to it? This, too, would result in relatively fast growth.
The Cube Root Law. This method was developed to ensure that growth is slow and steady. Instead of picking a fixed number of House seats and establishing it as the target ratio for constituents to representatives, we would use the cube root of the national population to establish the number of legislators, then apportion across the states in proportion to state populations. Whenever the national population grows, so too would the number of representatives, but slowly compared with the other options. At our current population, this rule would give us 692 seats.
Here is a chart laying out the number of representatives you would have over time on three different growth principles, given population increases:
The U.S. population is projected to cross the 400 million mark in 2058. This means the pressure to add seats to the House will only increase and slow, steady upward movement is probably better than fast. It would also be better than making a one-time move, only inevitably to face the same problem very soon thereafter.
When one recognizes the implications of projected population growth, the cube-root method comes to seem the simplest, soundest method for managing growth over time.
Its biggest problem is that its initially hard to understand, because most of us dont have intuitions about cube roots. It sounds like a bad dental experience. So advocates worry that it would be hard to sell to the American public. But, hey, America! Can we handle the math, or what?
The Least Variation in District Size Rule. From 2010 to 2020, Rhode Island had two representatives and Montana had one, even though Rhode Islands population was only slightly larger. This method would address that by prioritizing districts that are roughly the same size across the country. At our current population, this rule would produce a House of between 909 and 1,014 seats, as per the American Academy of Arts and Sciences report.
Restore the 1913 Ratio. Another option would be to use the fixed ratio that characterized the House when the 435-seat number was established in 1913. At that time, there were 211,000 constituents per member. If we returned to that today, we would have a House of 1,572.
The James Madison Rule. Or we could be even more ambitious and use an even older aspirational ratio. In an amendment to the Bill of Rights as originally proposed, Madison sought a ratio of no more than 50,000 constituents per representative. His amendment is still out there, available for ratification. This would give us a House of roughly 6,500 members.
Restore the Original Ratio. Or we could be even more ambitious than that and restore the first actual ratio used: 35,000 constituents per representative. That would give us about 9,400 members. (If we wanted to add an eighth option, we could opt for George Washingtons rule of no more than 30,000 constituents per representative. That would yield 11,000 members.)
As I wrote in my last column, two current representatives have introduced bills to increase the size of the House. Rep. Sean Casten (D-Ill.) has introduced a bill using the Wyoming Rule. Rep. Earl Blumenauer (D-Ore.) has offered one employing the deferred maintenance rule.
Of those, Id go with Blumenauers bill out of concern for the instability of the denominator used to create the ratio for the Wyoming bill. But the Blumenauer bill provides only a one-off solution. It doesnt give us a smooth way to resize the House over time. For that reason, and given the anticipated scaling up of our population, I do think the cube-root rule is best.
Perhaps it would be good for our collective math skills, too.
Which of the options do you think makes the most sense and why? Can you come up with something better? Id love to know your thoughts in the comments below.
Danielle Allen on renovating democracy
See the original post:
Opinion | How big should the House of Representatives be? Here's the right size. - The Washington Post
- 45 pro-democracy activists face sentencing in Hong Kong. Heres who some of them are - The Associated Press - November 21st, 2024 [November 21st, 2024]
- Rifle and Coal Ridge High students dive into democracy as student election judges - Glenwood Springs Post Independent - November 21st, 2024 [November 21st, 2024]
- Is social media doing more harm than good to democracy? | The Hindu parley podcast - The Hindu - November 21st, 2024 [November 21st, 2024]
- Amir Alis Civil Rights Experience Will Strengthen Our Judiciary and Democracy - Civilrights.org - November 21st, 2024 [November 21st, 2024]
- The Daily Heller: Democracy, Where Art Thou? - PRINT Magazine - November 21st, 2024 [November 21st, 2024]
- Is social media doing more harm than good to democracy? - The Hindu - November 21st, 2024 [November 21st, 2024]
- Diverse Democracy: Reflections Covering Religion and the 2024 Elections - Interfaith America - November 21st, 2024 [November 21st, 2024]
- Is the EUs Democracy Defence Package Enough to Counter Disinformation and Cyber Threats? - Visegrad Insight - November 21st, 2024 [November 21st, 2024]
- Hong Kong sentences 45 pro-democracy leaders to prison terms of up to 10 years - The Washington Post - November 21st, 2024 [November 21st, 2024]
- Senegals elections were a triumph for democracy what went right - The Conversation Indonesia - November 21st, 2024 [November 21st, 2024]
- International outrage over sentencing of 45 pro-democracy activists in Hong Kong - The Guardian - November 21st, 2024 [November 21st, 2024]
- After the elections, whats next for democracy? - Brookings Institution - November 21st, 2024 [November 21st, 2024]
- Daughter of Political Prisoner in Azerbaijan: Govt Is Using COP29 as Chance to Enrich the Regime - Democracy Now! - November 21st, 2024 [November 21st, 2024]
- Without access to the truth, we cannot have a democracy, says GW law professor - MSNBC - November 21st, 2024 [November 21st, 2024]
- Democracy first: In Guyana, PM Modi says never moved forward with expansionist vision - The Indian Express - November 21st, 2024 [November 21st, 2024]
- The Trump Cabinet picks who seriously threaten democracy and the ones who dont - Vox.com - November 21st, 2024 [November 21st, 2024]
- Trump Goes Dark MAGA and Calls Harris Threat to Democracy - The Daily Beast - October 14th, 2024 [October 14th, 2024]
- Nikole Hannah-Jones, Center for Journalism and Democracy Host Third Annual Democracy Summit - The Dig - October 14th, 2024 [October 14th, 2024]
- Democracy requires us to consider the hypotheticals all of them - Star Tribune - October 14th, 2024 [October 14th, 2024]
- The Militarys Role in Democracy the topic Oct. 22 at URI Rhody Today - The University of Rhode Island - October 14th, 2024 [October 14th, 2024]
- Dr. Heather Cox Richardson on Democracy Awakening: Notes on the State of America, Part 1 of 2 - Brene Brown - October 14th, 2024 [October 14th, 2024]
- Opinion | Lies, liars and lying threaten democracy and lives - The Washington Post - October 14th, 2024 [October 14th, 2024]
- October 21 Safeguarding Democracy Project Webinar: "A.I., Social Media, the Information Environment and the 2024 Elections" (Klonick, Nyhan,... - October 14th, 2024 [October 14th, 2024]
- US Supreme Court term opens with the stench of a democracy in shambles - WSWS - October 14th, 2024 [October 14th, 2024]
- Opinion | The project to bring democracy west of Pittsburgh - The Washington Post - October 14th, 2024 [October 14th, 2024]
- Be well informed to make best vote for democracy - Polkio.com - October 14th, 2024 [October 14th, 2024]
- Is the Constitution threatening democracy? Former UCI law dean argues it is - Inland Valley Daily Bulletin - October 14th, 2024 [October 14th, 2024]
- Democracy and reality are on the ballot - The Hill - October 14th, 2024 [October 14th, 2024]
- Motaz Azaiza, Acclaimed Journalist from Gaza, on Photographing War & Making Art from the Pain - Democracy Now! - October 14th, 2024 [October 14th, 2024]
- Proving Democracy's Resolve and Resilience: Forum 2000 opens in Prague - Radio Prague International - October 14th, 2024 [October 14th, 2024]
- Stanford Olivier Nomellini Senior Fellow speaks on the global crisis of democracy - The Tiger - October 14th, 2024 [October 14th, 2024]
- In an Era of Mistrust and Upheaval, Democracy Seeks a Path Forward - The New York Times - October 14th, 2024 [October 14th, 2024]
- Over a billion have voted in 2024: has democracy won? - The Economist - October 7th, 2024 [October 7th, 2024]
- Whats at stake is the world: Nobel winner Maria Ressa warns U.S. election a tipping point for democracy - POLITICO - October 7th, 2024 [October 7th, 2024]
- Why trying to protect freedom may work better than campaigning to protect democracy - The Fulcrum - October 7th, 2024 [October 7th, 2024]
- Editorial: Democracy doesnt have to be a beast of burden - TBR News Media - October 7th, 2024 [October 7th, 2024]
- Spreading Democracy May Not Be In The United States Best Interest OpEd - Eurasia Review - October 7th, 2024 [October 7th, 2024]
- Opinion: Trump lost the respect of veterans including me. He's a risk to our democracy. - USA TODAY - October 7th, 2024 [October 7th, 2024]
- Dont panic: AI can strengthen democracy too - College of Social Sciences and Humanities - October 7th, 2024 [October 7th, 2024]
- Mathews: Democracy is not in decline, but the global nation-states are - The Mercury News - October 7th, 2024 [October 7th, 2024]
- Rooks: Republicans join the battle to save democracy - Seacoastonline.com - October 7th, 2024 [October 7th, 2024]
- Everything your kids wont learn in school about our democracy: Can parents fill the void? - KCRW - October 7th, 2024 [October 7th, 2024]
- Saed drives the last nail in the coffin of Tunisian democracy - Institute for Security Studies - October 7th, 2024 [October 7th, 2024]
- JD Vance is the handpicked leader of the anti-democracy movement in the US - The Guardian - October 4th, 2024 [October 4th, 2024]
- How to rebuild democracy to truly harness the power of the people - New Scientist - October 4th, 2024 [October 4th, 2024]
- The Assault On Democracy Goes Global - Foreign Policy In Focus - October 4th, 2024 [October 4th, 2024]
- How political bettors are gambling on the future of democracy - MSNBC - October 4th, 2024 [October 4th, 2024]
- Democracy by Design: How IFES and AEOBiH Built Bosnias Election Blueprint - The International Foundation for Electoral Systems - October 4th, 2024 [October 4th, 2024]
- Democracy Is Fading in the Birthplace of the Arab Spring - Bloomberg - October 4th, 2024 [October 4th, 2024]
- Leveraging AI for Democracy: Civic Innovation on the New Digital Playing Field - National Endowment for Democracy - October 4th, 2024 [October 4th, 2024]
- Hawthorn Hill Journal: Of Signs and Democracy - AllOTSEGO - October 4th, 2024 [October 4th, 2024]
- Truth and democracy in an era of misinformation - Science - October 4th, 2024 [October 4th, 2024]
- Readers are concerned about democracy, but in very different ways - San Antonio Express-News - October 4th, 2024 [October 4th, 2024]
- The Maine Idea: Republicans join the battle to save democracy - Press Herald - October 4th, 2024 [October 4th, 2024]
- The Democratic Party is the real threat to democracy - Washington Examiner - October 4th, 2024 [October 4th, 2024]
- Why trying to protect freedom may work better than campaigning to protect democracy - The Conversation Indonesia - October 4th, 2024 [October 4th, 2024]
- Opinion: Democracy has the right to defend itself against the clown car - The Mercury News - October 4th, 2024 [October 4th, 2024]
- Three Lesser-Known Democracy Funders That Front-Loaded Support This Year - Inside Philanthropy - October 4th, 2024 [October 4th, 2024]
- Saed and the Mirage of Direct Democracy - ISPI - October 4th, 2024 [October 4th, 2024]
- Vance: Post-Trump President and Future of the Anti-Democracy Movement - LA Progressive - October 4th, 2024 [October 4th, 2024]
- Israels Attacks on Gaza Have Wiped Out 902 Entire Palestinian Families - Democracy Now! - October 4th, 2024 [October 4th, 2024]
- VP Debate Exchange on the Transfer of Power and State of Democracy - C-SPAN - October 3rd, 2024 [October 3rd, 2024]
- WATCH: Voters react in real time to key Vance-Walz debate moments on immigration, democracy, abortion - Fox News - October 3rd, 2024 [October 3rd, 2024]
- Commentary: Democracy does not start or end at the ballot box - Ithaca College The Ithacan - October 3rd, 2024 [October 3rd, 2024]
- The Judiciary Reform and the risk of Playing with the Pillars of Democracy - Wilson Center - October 3rd, 2024 [October 3rd, 2024]
- Fred Upton talks on protecting democracy, harms of dark money at WMU event - MLive.com - October 3rd, 2024 [October 3rd, 2024]
- Defending Democracy in the US - Human Rights Watch - October 3rd, 2024 [October 3rd, 2024]
- Part of the conversation | Our Shared Democracy connects people through civic engagement - NCWLIFE News - October 3rd, 2024 [October 3rd, 2024]
- How WITF is using democracy reporting to build trust and tamp down political rhetoric - Editor And Publisher Magazine - October 3rd, 2024 [October 3rd, 2024]
- Jabonero (OEI): The problems of Latin America are solved with democracy, not by enlightened saviors - The Diplomat in Spain - October 3rd, 2024 [October 3rd, 2024]
- Religious scholar uncovers the 'spiritual warriors' threatening Democracy - WYPR - October 3rd, 2024 [October 3rd, 2024]
- The crucial role of opposition in safeguarding democracy - The Jakarta Post - October 3rd, 2024 [October 3rd, 2024]
- Deliberative Democracy and Climate Change: Exploring the Potential of Climate Assemblies in the Global South - International IDEA - October 3rd, 2024 [October 3rd, 2024]
- Hakeem Jeffries on Winning the House and Defending Democracy Against Another January 6 - Vanity Fair - October 3rd, 2024 [October 3rd, 2024]
- 'The Teamsters are paragons of democracy' - The Week - October 3rd, 2024 [October 3rd, 2024]
- Dan Rather: The Real Threat That Trump Poses to Our Democracy - OB Rag - October 3rd, 2024 [October 3rd, 2024]
- Elon Musk: Voting for Trump only way to save democracy - The Hill - October 1st, 2024 [October 1st, 2024]
- Opinion | The hard and sacred work of renewing democracy - The Washington Post - October 1st, 2024 [October 1st, 2024]
- Opinion | The Teamsters Make a Lonely Stand for Democracy - The Wall Street Journal - October 1st, 2024 [October 1st, 2024]
- Spreading Democracy May Not Be in the United States Best Interest - AIER - Daily Economy News - October 1st, 2024 [October 1st, 2024]