Trench Lawfare: Inside the Battles to Save Democracy From the Trump Administration – TIME
Black-clad security forces armed with riot shields advance on a mass of peaceful demonstrators. Rubber bullets and gas canisters fly. The embattled head of state, flanked by his top prosecutor and general, emerges from his estate to stake a claim for order. The scene looked like something out of a banana republic, but it unfolded in Washingtons Lafayette Square on June 1. And soon after, an obscure nonprofit got a call from a state attorney generals office, asking the perennial questions of the Donald Trump era: Can he do that? How can we stop that from happening here?
These are questions the nonprofit Protect Democracy was founded to answer. When the call came in (from a state the group declines to name), its lawyers got to work on an analysis of the Insurrection Act of 1807, aiming to equip local leaders to fight back if the Administration seeks to send in the military over their objections, as President Trump has threatened to do. And they began rounding up bipartisan signatories for a statement on behalf of Department of Justice veterans decrying Attorney General Bill Barrs conduct.
Since the beginning of the Trump presidency, Protect Democracy has cast itself in the role its name suggests: defender of Americas system of government against the threat of authoritarianism. Started by two former Obama White House lawyers who were concerned that the new President would undermine the rule of law, the group has filed lawsuits to block Trumps retaliation against critics and to curtail his use of emergency powers. It has organized groups of civil servants to speak out against what they say is Trumps politicization of law enforcement. And it has built bipartisan congressional support to rein in presidential powers.
Protect Democracy has notched some big wins. The groups lawsuits invalidated Trumps emergency declaration for the southern border and blocked the Administration from making it harder for low-income green-card holders to become citizens. They successfully argued in New York federal court that the Presidents retaliation against media outlets may violate the Constitution, and helped ensure that a defamation lawsuit brought by a former mistress could proceed in state court. Their advocacy has gotten states to reform election procedures and Congress to act to limit Executive power.
Its an impressive record for a three-year-old startup. They are innovative, imaginative, energetic and extremely effective, says Benjamin Wittes, senior fellow at the Brookings Institution and editor in chief of Lawfare, whose work with the group led to the release of the Watergate prosecutors road map that had been sealed for more than 40 years.
The June 1 spectacle at Lafayette Square seems to have brought some reticent figures closer to Protect Democracys view of things. Former President George W. Bush and former Defense Secretary Jim Mattis were among those who spoke out in favor of the protesters. When you see military helicopters above the streets of D.C., using tactics from war zones, using tear gas on peaceful protesters exercising their First Amendment rights, says Ian Bassin, co-founder and executive director of Protect Democracy, these things so match what people imagine when they think of the toppling of democracies that it struck a chord.
From the beginning, however, Protect Democracy has argued the onset of authoritarianism in America would come not with a flash-bang grenade but with the whimper of institutions gradually succumbing to the erosion of long-standing norms. Ideas that seemed far-fetched three years ago have become routine: a President who declares himself immune to congressional or judicial oversight; whose Attorney General seeks to exempt the Presidents friends from responsibility while prosecuting his political enemies; whose lawyers argue in open court that he could, in fact, shoot someone on Fifth Avenue without consequence. The events of recent days appear to validate the groups concerns, with Trumps former National Security Adviser accusing him of corrupting the electoral process and the Administration firing a U.S. prosecutor whose office was investigating the Presidents close associates. Trump continues to sow doubt about the integrity of the upcoming election, recently declaring on Twitter that it would be the most RIGGED Election in our nations history.
As the election nears, Protect Democracy is focused on securing the Nov. 3 contests against foreign and domestic meddling. The group, which is officially nonpartisan, is funded by foundations and individual donors, including the LinkedIn founder Reid Hoffman and Boston-based investor Seth Klarman, who before Trump was the GOPs largest donor in New England. Protect Democracy is lobbying and advising states on election procedure with an eye to ensuring a legitimate result. Yet the group is also looking beyond Trump, seeing him as a symptom of a system whose weakened defenses leave it open to abuse, and figuring out what can be done to strengthen American democracy in the future, regardless of who is in the White House next year.
Trump tours a section of the border wall in Otay Mesa, Calif., on Sept. 18, 2019
Evan VucciAP
If you believed your government was slouching toward dictatorship, what would you do about it? The answer, to judge from Protect Democracys routine, can seem mundane. On a recent Monday, 55 people are assembled as squares on a screen in a Google Meet video chat. Long before COVID-19 turned nearly all white collar workers into video-chat adepts, Protect Democracy was a work-from-anywhere organization, its 66 employees scattered from coast to coast. (Bassin is based in the Bay Area, co-founder Justin Florence in Boston; the group maintains a lease on a WeWork space in D.C.)
But the topics on such calls reach to the highest levels of government. Im working on a letter calling on the Justice Department inspector general to open an investigation into Barrs involvement in Lafayette Square, Justin Vail, a lawyer for Protect Democracy, tells the team. Vail, a former Obama White House and Democratic Senate aide, tells the group hes assembled more than a thousand signatories, former federal prosecutors from Republican and Democratic Administrations.
These sorts of current and former government insiders are disdained by the President and his allies as the deep statepetty bureaucrats dedicated to undermining Trumps necessary disruption of the status quo. But a competent, nonpolitical civil service is an important component of democracy. In America, officials from the President to the lowest-ranking soldier swear an oath pledging loyalty not to any ruler, Administration or party, but to the Constitution itself.
For many civil servants, that nonpartisanship has traditionally extended from one Administration to the next, and even past their time in government. Its hard to overstate how unusualbasically unprecedentedit is to have former career officials speaking out in this way, says Ben Berwick, who spent six years in the DOJs Civil Division during the Obama Administration. He left a few months after Trump took office, and became one of Protect Democracys earliest hires. The group has now massed hundreds of DOJ alums on a series of letters like the one Vail is preparing. Among the most high-profile was one stating that any ordinary American who committed the acts described in Robert Muellers Russia report would have been prosecuted for obstruction of justice, and another deploring Barrs extraordinary move to request a lighter sentence for former Trump campaign aide Roger Stone.
The group says such letters have brought concrete changes. We have seen [current Justice officials] resign, withdraw from cases, object and file internal complaints as a result, Vail says. Its a reminder that people on the outside support them having the courage to stand up and continue to work with integrity. As the group was preparing its 2,500-signatory letter on the Stone case, Barr publicly distanced himself from the Presidenta sign, the group says, that he was feeling pressure in his ranks. The department subsequently backtracked on its sentencing recommendation. On June 23, a former prosecutor testified to Congress that Stones softened sentence had been the result of heavy pressure from the highest levels of the Department of Justice to cut Stone a break because of his relationship to the President.
Protect Democracys founders, Bassin and Florence, both served in the White House counsels office during the Obama Administration. By the time Trump took office, both had left government and moved on to other thingsBassin to international antipoverty work, Florence to a comfortable gig at a top law firm. But as the new Presidents actions set off alarm bells, the two began corresponding. They realized that there was no single organization doing what they were talking about: safeguarding basic principles, like checks and balances, and the idea that no one is above the law, against a perceived threat to democracy itself.
Bassin and Florence began consulting scholars who study authoritarianism abroad, hoping on some level that experts would say they were out of their minds. But the scholars shared the same worries. The scary thing was that no one rolled their eyes; nobody said, Oh, come on, really, youre being hysterical,' Bassin says.
Experts pointed to places like Poland and Turkey, where authoritarian leaders won elections and turned their countries into what scholars of the region describe as Potemkin democracies by curtailing civil rights and undermining popular control of the government. Democracies today die in a much more subtle fashion than they used to, says Harvard political scientist Steven Levitsky, co-author of the book How Democracies Die. Its pretty rare to see the generals all at once seize power, dissolve the constitution, and imprison dissidents and the press. Instead you see elected leaders graduallyimperceptibly to many citizenstransform the machinery of government to protect their friends and harass and punish their enemies.
Bassin recalls one early, telling example. Under Obama, one of his jobs had been to advise Executive Branch officials on how to follow rules set out in thick binders and handed down from Administration to Administration starting with President Eisenhowers in the 1950s. Many werent laws so much as norms and codes intended to embody the spirit of public service. Among the precepts, for example, is a 14-page memo dating to the Carter Administration that lays out specific rules for when and how White House officials could contact the Justice Department, to avoid the perception of politics influencing law enforcement. In February 2017, then White House chief of staff Reince Priebus contacted the FBI to ask the agency to publicly refute a New York Times report about contacts between Trump associates and Russian agents, and the White House openly acknowledged he had made the contact. It was already clear back thenbefore Trump fired FBI Director James Comey, before Mueller began his investigation, before Ukraine and impeachment and everything elsethat the new Administration was not interested in the binders and memos, the rules and norms, that had prevailed for generations.
Bassin and Florence wanted their organization to be bipartisan. It really is something that Republicans and Democrats, all people of good faith, should be able to agree on, that the President is not a monarch who is above accountability of any kind, says Jamila Benkato, who joined the group after clerking for a federal judge in California. But most of the groups early hires were liberals. Even Trump-skeptical conservatives wanted to give the new President a chance to grow into the job. And the group has struggled to establish a public identity that transcends its liberal roots.
Yet the mission has attracted some Republicans. Protect Democracys employees include a former GOP presidential campaign operative and consultant for the Koch brothers political outfit; a former clerk to the conservative federal judge Edith Brown Clement; and a former GOP Senate staffer and writer for the conservative Weekly Standard. In March, the group assembled 37 former Republican members of Congress and Administration officials to file a friend-of-the-court brief in Trump v. Vance, arguing that the Presidents accountants must comply with a subpoena for documents related to his hush-money payments to alleged mistresses.
From a conservative standpoint, its clear to me that the President is offending the rule of law generally and the Constitution specifically, says Stuart Gerson, who headed the DOJs Civil Division under President George H.W. Bush. Gerson worked with Protect Democracy on its successful lawsuit in a conservative court in Texas, which thwarted Trumps attempt to build his border wall without permission or funding from Congress. Im an apostle of the unitary executiveI argued all the war-powers cases in the Bush Administration, Gerson says of the idea that the Constitution gives the President expansive powers over the workings of the Executive Branch. But that [doctrine] puts the President in charge of the Executive Branch, not the other two.
Protect Democracy has organized former Justice Department officials to speak out against Barr, left, and President Trump
Doug MillsThe New York Times/Redux
Sometime in the coming weeks, the Supreme Court is set to rule on Trump v. Vance and two related cases having to do with the validity of subpoenas into the Presidents private conduct. The cases will test the idea that no one is above the law, by resolving whether a President can be investigated and held accountable for any activities, even those that precede or have nothing to do with the office. Protect Democracys advocates say the cases are part of a broader set of questions about presidential power, which they have been fighting to constrain.
One of Trumps first moves as President was the creation of an election-integrity commission, which sought to examine allegations of voting abuse, like his baseless claim that the 2016 election was tainted by millions of illegal votes. Working with other advocacy groups, Protect Democracy sued based on a technicalitythe Administrations failure to follow the Paperwork Reduction Act, which mandates the procedures for establishing such commissionsand informed states they were not required to provide the Administration with the voter data it sought. The commission, Protect Democracy argued, represented not a good-faith effort to secure the vote but an attempt to sow doubt based on a nonexistent problem. Within a few months, the commission was shuttered.
Later that year, when Trump pardoned Joe Arpaio, the former Maricopa County, Arizona, sheriff convicted of contempt of court for racially profiling Latinos, Protect Democracy filed a brief arguing the pardon was unconstitutional. The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit agreed to appoint a private attorney to argue the matter. And when the Administration released a report claiming that immigrants were responsible for most acts of terrorisminformation Trump cited in his 2017 address to Congressthe group sued based on an obscure statute, the Information Quality Act, thats typically used by Big Business to dispute environmental regulations. It was a legally creative approach to a vexing question: If the government decides to simply make up statistics, does the public have any recourse? While that litigation is still pending, the Justice Department admitted in court that the terrorism report was inaccurate.
When the former Apprentice contestant Summer Zervos sued Trump for defamation in 2017 after he called her a liar for accusing him of sexual assault, Protect Democracy filed the only outside brief, arguing the President was not immune from civil lawsuits. It was a little-noticed case, but one the group thought could establish a dangerous precedent. In ruling Zervos suit could go forward, the court drew extensively on Protect Democracys arguments. It is the first time a court has ruled the President is subject to civil lawsuits in state court.
In October 2018, Protect Democracy filed another lawsuit on behalf of PEN America, a journalists organization, arguing that Trump was violating the First Amendment by revoking press credentials to punish journalists and threatening media businesses bottom lines: stalling the proposed merger of CNNs parent company, raising postal rates on Amazon (whose founder, Jeff Bezos, owns the Washington Post) and threatening to revoke broadcast licenses. In March, the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York ruled the suit could go forward.
Over the course of this presidency, Protect Democracy has broadened its purview, on the theory that threats to American democracy do not begin or end with Trump, and that many of the weaknesses he is exploiting predate him. Presidents of both parties have steadily expanded executive power, while Congress has willingly ceded more and more of its constitutional authorities. Protect Democracy has worked with both parties in Congress to reclaim some power from the Executive Branch, teaming up with GOP Senator Mike Lee on a bill putting new limitations on presidential emergency powers. The legislation advanced out of committee on a bipartisan 11-2 vote. Protect Democracy is also collaborating with advocates who have been working for years to reassert congressional authority over war powers; the group filed lawsuits to force the Administration to release the memos justifying its military strikes on Syrian chemical-weapons sites and the Iranian general Qasem Soleimani.
In 2018, Protect Democracy broke away from its federal work and intervened in recounts under way in two states, Georgia and Florida, where candidates were overseeing elections in which they were also competing. In Georgia, their lawsuit helped prompt gubernatorial candidate Brian Kemp to resign as secretary of state. Since then, the group has sought to find and fix weaknesses in voting systems, lobbying and advocating for new voting machines in South Carolina and Pennsylvania. It has also tackled voter suppression, using an old statute aimed at the Ku Klux Klan to stop a Trump ally from harassing Latino voters in Virginia and working with a North Carolina group, Forward Justice, to bring a lawsuit that would force the state to re-enfranchise felons.
More than a year ago, Protect Democracy formed a bipartisan election task force to examine such threats and recommend responses. Ironically, one of the crises they originally decided not to plan for was a potential pandemic. Now, as COVID-19 has thrown states election plans into doubt, the group has made a set of recommendations for moving forward with mail balloting and other changes.
For now, Protect Democracy says it wants to ensure that the November election is free and fair, producing a result that can be widely accepted as legitimate regardless of who wins. Whenever Trump leaves office, the group envisions a brief window for Congress to pass reforms, similar to the burst of legislation that followed President Nixons resignation. The organization has been gearing up for this with a 100 days agenda of recommendations for the next President, including changes to election systems, prohibitions on election interference and campaign-finance reform.
In a democracy, the people are the ultimate check on power. Protect Democracys central argument is that institutions dont protect themselves; people have to be activated to use the tools the system provides. In a timely metaphor, the groups leaders compare authoritarianism to a virus sweeping the globe: first you treat the patient by activating the bodys immune system to fight off the illness; over time, you formulate a vaccine to provide immunity in the future.
When Ian and I first started talking about this, we thought it would be an organization that lasted however long Trump was in office, then folded up shop, says Florence, the groups co-founder and legal director. What weve learned is that were seeing a moment that requires a generation-long response. Ultimately, weve got to rebuild our institutions to make our system more resistant to a future authoritarian-minded leader.
With reporting by Leslie Dickstein and Josh Rosenberg
This appears in the July 06, 2020 issue of TIME.
Thank you! For your security, we've sent a confirmation email to the address you entered. Click the link to confirm your subscription and begin receiving our newsletters. If you don't get the confirmation within 10 minutes, please check your spam folder.
Write to Molly Ball at molly.ball@time.com.
The rest is here:
Trench Lawfare: Inside the Battles to Save Democracy From the Trump Administration - TIME
- 45 pro-democracy activists face sentencing in Hong Kong. Heres who some of them are - The Associated Press - November 21st, 2024 [November 21st, 2024]
- Rifle and Coal Ridge High students dive into democracy as student election judges - Glenwood Springs Post Independent - November 21st, 2024 [November 21st, 2024]
- Is social media doing more harm than good to democracy? | The Hindu parley podcast - The Hindu - November 21st, 2024 [November 21st, 2024]
- Amir Alis Civil Rights Experience Will Strengthen Our Judiciary and Democracy - Civilrights.org - November 21st, 2024 [November 21st, 2024]
- The Daily Heller: Democracy, Where Art Thou? - PRINT Magazine - November 21st, 2024 [November 21st, 2024]
- Is social media doing more harm than good to democracy? - The Hindu - November 21st, 2024 [November 21st, 2024]
- Diverse Democracy: Reflections Covering Religion and the 2024 Elections - Interfaith America - November 21st, 2024 [November 21st, 2024]
- Is the EUs Democracy Defence Package Enough to Counter Disinformation and Cyber Threats? - Visegrad Insight - November 21st, 2024 [November 21st, 2024]
- Hong Kong sentences 45 pro-democracy leaders to prison terms of up to 10 years - The Washington Post - November 21st, 2024 [November 21st, 2024]
- Senegals elections were a triumph for democracy what went right - The Conversation Indonesia - November 21st, 2024 [November 21st, 2024]
- International outrage over sentencing of 45 pro-democracy activists in Hong Kong - The Guardian - November 21st, 2024 [November 21st, 2024]
- After the elections, whats next for democracy? - Brookings Institution - November 21st, 2024 [November 21st, 2024]
- Daughter of Political Prisoner in Azerbaijan: Govt Is Using COP29 as Chance to Enrich the Regime - Democracy Now! - November 21st, 2024 [November 21st, 2024]
- Without access to the truth, we cannot have a democracy, says GW law professor - MSNBC - November 21st, 2024 [November 21st, 2024]
- Democracy first: In Guyana, PM Modi says never moved forward with expansionist vision - The Indian Express - November 21st, 2024 [November 21st, 2024]
- The Trump Cabinet picks who seriously threaten democracy and the ones who dont - Vox.com - November 21st, 2024 [November 21st, 2024]
- Trump Goes Dark MAGA and Calls Harris Threat to Democracy - The Daily Beast - October 14th, 2024 [October 14th, 2024]
- Nikole Hannah-Jones, Center for Journalism and Democracy Host Third Annual Democracy Summit - The Dig - October 14th, 2024 [October 14th, 2024]
- Democracy requires us to consider the hypotheticals all of them - Star Tribune - October 14th, 2024 [October 14th, 2024]
- The Militarys Role in Democracy the topic Oct. 22 at URI Rhody Today - The University of Rhode Island - October 14th, 2024 [October 14th, 2024]
- Dr. Heather Cox Richardson on Democracy Awakening: Notes on the State of America, Part 1 of 2 - Brene Brown - October 14th, 2024 [October 14th, 2024]
- Opinion | Lies, liars and lying threaten democracy and lives - The Washington Post - October 14th, 2024 [October 14th, 2024]
- October 21 Safeguarding Democracy Project Webinar: "A.I., Social Media, the Information Environment and the 2024 Elections" (Klonick, Nyhan,... - October 14th, 2024 [October 14th, 2024]
- US Supreme Court term opens with the stench of a democracy in shambles - WSWS - October 14th, 2024 [October 14th, 2024]
- Opinion | The project to bring democracy west of Pittsburgh - The Washington Post - October 14th, 2024 [October 14th, 2024]
- Be well informed to make best vote for democracy - Polkio.com - October 14th, 2024 [October 14th, 2024]
- Is the Constitution threatening democracy? Former UCI law dean argues it is - Inland Valley Daily Bulletin - October 14th, 2024 [October 14th, 2024]
- Democracy and reality are on the ballot - The Hill - October 14th, 2024 [October 14th, 2024]
- Motaz Azaiza, Acclaimed Journalist from Gaza, on Photographing War & Making Art from the Pain - Democracy Now! - October 14th, 2024 [October 14th, 2024]
- Proving Democracy's Resolve and Resilience: Forum 2000 opens in Prague - Radio Prague International - October 14th, 2024 [October 14th, 2024]
- Stanford Olivier Nomellini Senior Fellow speaks on the global crisis of democracy - The Tiger - October 14th, 2024 [October 14th, 2024]
- In an Era of Mistrust and Upheaval, Democracy Seeks a Path Forward - The New York Times - October 14th, 2024 [October 14th, 2024]
- Over a billion have voted in 2024: has democracy won? - The Economist - October 7th, 2024 [October 7th, 2024]
- Whats at stake is the world: Nobel winner Maria Ressa warns U.S. election a tipping point for democracy - POLITICO - October 7th, 2024 [October 7th, 2024]
- Why trying to protect freedom may work better than campaigning to protect democracy - The Fulcrum - October 7th, 2024 [October 7th, 2024]
- Editorial: Democracy doesnt have to be a beast of burden - TBR News Media - October 7th, 2024 [October 7th, 2024]
- Spreading Democracy May Not Be In The United States Best Interest OpEd - Eurasia Review - October 7th, 2024 [October 7th, 2024]
- Opinion: Trump lost the respect of veterans including me. He's a risk to our democracy. - USA TODAY - October 7th, 2024 [October 7th, 2024]
- Dont panic: AI can strengthen democracy too - College of Social Sciences and Humanities - October 7th, 2024 [October 7th, 2024]
- Mathews: Democracy is not in decline, but the global nation-states are - The Mercury News - October 7th, 2024 [October 7th, 2024]
- Rooks: Republicans join the battle to save democracy - Seacoastonline.com - October 7th, 2024 [October 7th, 2024]
- Everything your kids wont learn in school about our democracy: Can parents fill the void? - KCRW - October 7th, 2024 [October 7th, 2024]
- Saed drives the last nail in the coffin of Tunisian democracy - Institute for Security Studies - October 7th, 2024 [October 7th, 2024]
- JD Vance is the handpicked leader of the anti-democracy movement in the US - The Guardian - October 4th, 2024 [October 4th, 2024]
- How to rebuild democracy to truly harness the power of the people - New Scientist - October 4th, 2024 [October 4th, 2024]
- The Assault On Democracy Goes Global - Foreign Policy In Focus - October 4th, 2024 [October 4th, 2024]
- How political bettors are gambling on the future of democracy - MSNBC - October 4th, 2024 [October 4th, 2024]
- Democracy by Design: How IFES and AEOBiH Built Bosnias Election Blueprint - The International Foundation for Electoral Systems - October 4th, 2024 [October 4th, 2024]
- Democracy Is Fading in the Birthplace of the Arab Spring - Bloomberg - October 4th, 2024 [October 4th, 2024]
- Leveraging AI for Democracy: Civic Innovation on the New Digital Playing Field - National Endowment for Democracy - October 4th, 2024 [October 4th, 2024]
- Hawthorn Hill Journal: Of Signs and Democracy - AllOTSEGO - October 4th, 2024 [October 4th, 2024]
- Truth and democracy in an era of misinformation - Science - October 4th, 2024 [October 4th, 2024]
- Readers are concerned about democracy, but in very different ways - San Antonio Express-News - October 4th, 2024 [October 4th, 2024]
- The Maine Idea: Republicans join the battle to save democracy - Press Herald - October 4th, 2024 [October 4th, 2024]
- The Democratic Party is the real threat to democracy - Washington Examiner - October 4th, 2024 [October 4th, 2024]
- Why trying to protect freedom may work better than campaigning to protect democracy - The Conversation Indonesia - October 4th, 2024 [October 4th, 2024]
- Opinion: Democracy has the right to defend itself against the clown car - The Mercury News - October 4th, 2024 [October 4th, 2024]
- Three Lesser-Known Democracy Funders That Front-Loaded Support This Year - Inside Philanthropy - October 4th, 2024 [October 4th, 2024]
- Saed and the Mirage of Direct Democracy - ISPI - October 4th, 2024 [October 4th, 2024]
- Vance: Post-Trump President and Future of the Anti-Democracy Movement - LA Progressive - October 4th, 2024 [October 4th, 2024]
- Israels Attacks on Gaza Have Wiped Out 902 Entire Palestinian Families - Democracy Now! - October 4th, 2024 [October 4th, 2024]
- VP Debate Exchange on the Transfer of Power and State of Democracy - C-SPAN - October 3rd, 2024 [October 3rd, 2024]
- WATCH: Voters react in real time to key Vance-Walz debate moments on immigration, democracy, abortion - Fox News - October 3rd, 2024 [October 3rd, 2024]
- Commentary: Democracy does not start or end at the ballot box - Ithaca College The Ithacan - October 3rd, 2024 [October 3rd, 2024]
- The Judiciary Reform and the risk of Playing with the Pillars of Democracy - Wilson Center - October 3rd, 2024 [October 3rd, 2024]
- Fred Upton talks on protecting democracy, harms of dark money at WMU event - MLive.com - October 3rd, 2024 [October 3rd, 2024]
- Defending Democracy in the US - Human Rights Watch - October 3rd, 2024 [October 3rd, 2024]
- Part of the conversation | Our Shared Democracy connects people through civic engagement - NCWLIFE News - October 3rd, 2024 [October 3rd, 2024]
- How WITF is using democracy reporting to build trust and tamp down political rhetoric - Editor And Publisher Magazine - October 3rd, 2024 [October 3rd, 2024]
- Jabonero (OEI): The problems of Latin America are solved with democracy, not by enlightened saviors - The Diplomat in Spain - October 3rd, 2024 [October 3rd, 2024]
- Religious scholar uncovers the 'spiritual warriors' threatening Democracy - WYPR - October 3rd, 2024 [October 3rd, 2024]
- The crucial role of opposition in safeguarding democracy - The Jakarta Post - October 3rd, 2024 [October 3rd, 2024]
- Deliberative Democracy and Climate Change: Exploring the Potential of Climate Assemblies in the Global South - International IDEA - October 3rd, 2024 [October 3rd, 2024]
- Hakeem Jeffries on Winning the House and Defending Democracy Against Another January 6 - Vanity Fair - October 3rd, 2024 [October 3rd, 2024]
- 'The Teamsters are paragons of democracy' - The Week - October 3rd, 2024 [October 3rd, 2024]
- Dan Rather: The Real Threat That Trump Poses to Our Democracy - OB Rag - October 3rd, 2024 [October 3rd, 2024]
- Elon Musk: Voting for Trump only way to save democracy - The Hill - October 1st, 2024 [October 1st, 2024]
- Opinion | The hard and sacred work of renewing democracy - The Washington Post - October 1st, 2024 [October 1st, 2024]
- Opinion | The Teamsters Make a Lonely Stand for Democracy - The Wall Street Journal - October 1st, 2024 [October 1st, 2024]
- Spreading Democracy May Not Be in the United States Best Interest - AIER - Daily Economy News - October 1st, 2024 [October 1st, 2024]