The vote fraud that Democrats refuse to see – New York Post

265 + 742 + 765 + 953 + 7,474 = 0.

This fuzzy math sums up Democrats orthodoxy on vote fraud: As the bulletproof evidence of fraud adds up, they still claim, Theres nothing to see here. Not even these hard numbers, based on verified vote-fraud cases, move their acceptance of this reality into the realm of positive integers.

This pathological denial is even more intense, now that President Trump has taken vote fraud seriously enough to appoint a bipartisan panel to get to the bottom of it.

While the Presidential Advisory Commission on Election Integrity is chaired by Republicans Vice President Mike Pence and co-chaired by Kansas Secretary of State Kris Kobach (whom I have known since college, thanks to the Washington Crossing Foundations scholarship program for civic-minded students), its members include two Democratic secretaries of state Maines Matthew Dunlap and New Hampshires Bill Gardner and Alabamas Alan Lamar King, a Democratic judge.

Never mind, leading Leftists insist. The issue is bogus, and the commission is evil.

Craftier liberals have inched away from the baseless Vote fraud = Loch Ness Monster argument. Now, some claim, vote fraud is not widespread.

As MSNBC host Katy Tur recently soothed her viewers: Nobody has found any widespread instances of voter fraud. Well, Katy, how widespread must vote fraud be before Democrats and their defenders agree that, at least, it should be investigated?

Gov. Terry McAuliffe (D-Va.), a long-time Clinton confidante, vetoed a bill in February that would have required probes of elections in which the number of ballots cast exceeded the number of voters eligible to cast them. How could any honest person oppose such a measure?

During the 2000 Bush v. Gore disaster, Democrats shouted, Count every vote! In their more admirable moments, Democrats were among those who demanded, One man. One vote.

Today, in order to preserve the dodgy electoral system that seems to benefit them when fishy things happen, their battle cries have devolved into Count every vote, but dont worry if some of them are negated by fake ones and One man. One vote. Usually.

This is pathetic. If Democrats will tolerate non-widespread vote fraud, how many phony ballots are they willing to see neutralize genuine ones? 265? 765? 7,474?

And whose legitimate ballots should be vaporized so that, in essence, fraudulent ballots can be cast and counted in peace? Sen. Sanders, lets start with yours.

Read more here:
The vote fraud that Democrats refuse to see - New York Post

Related Posts

Comments are closed.