‘Assure the right to life’: Lewis urges Southern Baptists to support pro-life amendment in US Constitution – The Pathway
EDITORS NOTE: This article includes reporting by Tom Strode of Baptist Press.
JEFFERSON CITY Longtime Missouri Southern Baptist statesman and pro-life advocate Larry Lewis is calling Southern Baptists to lead out in support of a pro-life amendment to the United States Constitution.
Lewis was among many Southern Baptist pro-life advocates who rejoiced, June 24, when the high court overruled its 1973 Roe v. Wade opinion as well as the 1992 Planned Parenthood v. Casey ruling that affirmed Roe and returned abortion policy to the states.
JEFFERSON CITY Longtime Missouri Southern Baptist statesman and denominational leader Larry Lewis and his wife, Creeda, greet Missouri Baptist Directors of Missions and other guests, March 29, during the dedication of the Larry Lewis Strategy Room at the Missouri Baptist Conventions building here. (Pathway photo by Benjamin Hawkins).
The Supreme Courts opinion in Dobbs v. Mississippi Womens Health Organization brought an end to an abortion rule established by Roe that cost the lives of more than an estimated 63 million preborn children.
The Supreme Courts reversal of Roe was a decision for which Lewis had long prayed. He was pastor of Tower Grove Baptist Church in St. Louis when he wrote and defended from the platform as a member of the 1980 Resolutions Committee the first pro-life resolution approved by messengers to the SBCs annual meeting. After his election as president of the Home Mission Board (now North American Mission Board) in 1987, the board inaugurated the same year under his leadership the Alternatives to Abortion Ministries to help churches and associations establish crisis pregnancy centers.
He is delighted the Roe v. Wade ruling has been overturned, Lewis said. Roe v. Wade is probably the worst decision ever rendered by the [U.S.] Supreme Court, with the possible exception of Dred Scott, the high courts 1857 opinion that said free and enslaved Black Americans were not U.S. citizens, he said.
Never in the history of our republic has any court ever found in the Constitution a right for a mother to kill her children, either born or unborn, he wrote in a statement for Baptist Press.
Of course, reversing Roe v. Wade doesnt assure the right to life for the unborn but simply transfers the issue to the states to fashion whatever laws they think appropriate, Lewis said. Fortunately, there are several states that will likely prohibit or strictly regulate abortion except for extreme circumstances, such as where the life of the mother is seriously threatened. Unfortunately, many others will freely allow abortions with few or any restrictions.
[W]e have a fight for life on our hands! We must fight hard to assure our state legislatures fashion strong right-to-life legislation. We must fight equally as hard against those who will undoubtedly seek to amend the Constitution to assure the right to abort is constitutional. Instead, we should seek to amend the Constitution to assure the right to life, already clearly embedded in the Constitution, applies to the unborn as well as to anyone else.
This month, Lewis delivered to The Pathway a statement calling for an amendment to the U.S. Constitution. His statement is based on an appeal he previously made in 1981, while serving as a board member for Southern Baptists for Life. Read the statement below:
When our founding fathers drafted the United States Constitution, they wisely included a provision whereby it could be amended. The persuasive arguments of James Madison convinced the others that providing a means to amend the constitution was not only desirable but imperative. Madison observed, in framing a system which we wish to last for ages, we should not lose sight of the changes which ages will produce.
Since that time the constitution has been amended many times for many reasons. To be exact, there have been 27 amendments in the nearly 250 year history of our republic, an average of at least one per decade! I believe most have been for the good of the country.
If it were not for amendments to the constitution our cherished right to worship would not be secure. It is the first amendment (not the constitution itself) that gives us the right to worship, freedom of speech, freedom of the press, and the right to peaceable assembly.
If it were not for amendments, women would not have a right to vote and black men and women would still be slaves. In fact, most of the cherished rights we enjoy in America today are provided through amendments to the constitution, rather than by the constitution itself. Perhaps most important of these are the first ten, commonly called The Bill of Rights.
But why is there a need for yet another amendment to secure the right to life for the unborn? Doesnt the constitution speak eloquently of certain unalienable rights, among these the right to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness? Unfortunately, this beautiful rhetoric found in the Declaration of Independence never made it into the constitution. The constitution itself says nothing about a right to life for either the born or unborn. Thank God for the fifth and fourteenth amendments or there would be no right to life assured by the United States Constitution!
The fifth amendment states that a person cannot be deprived of life, liberty, or property without due process of law. Life, liberty, and property can be taken, but only by due process of law. Also, this provision applies only to persons.
In the infamous Dred Scott decision the obvious rights of black men and women were abridged in order to sustain slavery. The Supreme Court ruled that since black men and women were slaves, they should be classified as property rather than as persons. Therefore, the right to own slaves, abuse slaves, and even kill slaves was sustained on the grounds that they were not really persons and therefore could not enjoy any rights provided by the constitution and the fifth amendment. Does this not remind one of the muddled reasoning the Supreme Court used in Roe v. Wade in 1973 concluding that the unborn were not protected by the constitution because they were not persons?
The twisted thinking of the Dred Scott case was rectified several years later with the passage of the fourteenth amendment. This amendment specifically states that all persons born or naturalized in the United States are citizens of the United States and the state in which they reside and prohibits any state from depriving any person of life, liberty, or property without due process of law.
For years it was assumed that the right to life thus secured by the fifth and fourteenth amendments applied not only to citizens of the United States but to their unborn offspring. History is replete with countless instances where large monetary awards were given parents of unborn offspring who were damaged as a result of accident or violence. Abortion was prohibited by law in every state of the Union except in cases where the life of the mother was in danger or (in a few states) in cases of incest and/or rape. The idea that a mother would want to destroy her unborn baby was abhorrent.
This all changed in January, 1973. In the infamous Roe v. Wade decision, the Supreme Court concluded (1) a womans right to privacy included her right to decide to terminate her pregnancy and (2) states interest in unborn life is not sufficiently compelling to permit regulation of abortion (at least prior to viability). The court considered the argument that even if the unborn are not persons, they are at least human beings and that the state has a compelling interest in protecting the life of human beings. However, the court concluded that the unborn baby possessed only potential life and the interest of the state in protecting potential life is not compelling.
Thus the Supreme Court, the highest deliberative body in the land, concluded there was no right to life secured by the United States Constitution for the unborn. They question whether or not the unborn child is really a human being and they definitely conclude the unborn is not a person. Therefore, since he is not a person the fifth and fourteenth amendments provisions cannot apply since they are explicitly attributed to persons. They further conclude that since the rights secured by the constitution apply only to citizens of the United States and a citizen is defined as one who is born or naturalized in the United States they cannot apply to the unborn since they have neither been born or naturalized.
To say the unborn baby is not a person is the exact antithesis of the testimony of Jeremiah, before thou comest forth out of the womb I sanctified thee and I ordained thee a prophet unto the nations (Jer. 1:5). Likewise the Psalmist declared (referring to himself in the first person), I will praise thee, for I am fearfully and wonderfully made; and that my soul knoweth right well. My substance was not hid from thee when I was made in secret, and curiously wrought in the lowest parts of the earth. Thine eyes did see my substance, yet being unperfect; and in thy book all my members were written, which in continuance were fashioned, when as yet there was none of them (Ps. 139:14-16).
To imply, as did the Supreme Court in 1973, that the unborn is not a human being is absurd! If the unborn child is not a human being, what kind of being is it? From the moment the child is conceived it has every attribute of a human being. From that point it merely grows and develops.
Opposition to Roe v. Wade was immediate, even among the Justices themselves. In his dissent Justice White observed: I find nothing in the language or history of the constitution to support the courts judgement. The court simply fashions and announces a new constitutional right for pregnant mothers. Likewise, Justice Rehnquist stated in his dissent: To reach its result the court necessarily has had to find within the scope of the fourteenth amendment a right that was completely unknown to the drafters of the amendment.
Since that infamous decision in 1973, over 65 million unborn babies have been killed by abortion in the United States alone. Every 20 seconds we delay in correcting this terrible decision, another unborn baby is destroyed and discarded as so much trash!
If in 1964 it was important to amend the constitution so that the poll tax could be eliminated, is it not at least equally important to amend the constitution now so the senseless slaughter of unborn babies can be restrained?
In 1971 we amended the constitution so 18-year-olds might have the right to vote. Is it not just as important now to amend the constitution so that unborn babies may have the right to live?
In 1951, we amended the constitution so the President of the United States would be prohibited from serving more than two terms. Is it not just as important to amend the constitution now so a mother may be prohibited from destroying her unborn child?
Baptists should be at the forefront leading the effort to secure a human life amendment. Just as we have been quick and forceful in leading the effort to oppose gambling, the lottery, pornography, alcohol and drugs, we should be leading the effort to oppose the abortion holocaust in America today.
Southern Baptists are firmly on record in support of a human life amendment. Most resolutions on the issue passed by the Southern Baptist Convention since 1980 have included a strong statement supporting an amendment.
Likewise, most of our outstanding Southern Baptist leaders are outspoken in their support of this cause. Former SBC President, Dr. Adrian Rogers, identified abortion as the most important issue in our contemporary list of social concerns, and was a longtime supporter of those who sought to get a human life amendment approved by Congress. To my knowledge, all of our former Southern Baptist presidents since 1979 have been opponents of abortion and supporters of a human life amendment.
A human life amendment is imperative even though the muddled reasoning of Roe v. Wade has been corrected. Even though there has been a change in the consistency of the Supreme Court and more conservative, pro-life Justices have been appointed and even though the new court reversed Roe v. Wade, the potential for disaster still remains. An amendment is needed to make it explicitly clear that the right to life provided through the fifth and fourteenth amendments applies not only to the mother but to the unborn offspring as well.
I personally favor an amendment designed to return to the states the authority to make laws governing abortion. I do not believe it is the role of the constitution to become a criminal code, but rather to protect and secure those laws of the people, by the people, and for the people, enacted by the Congress and the state legislatures. Also, from the standpoint of political expediency, I believe this type of amendment has greater possibility of passage in Congress and ratification by the states.
For many years now in our state conventions and in our Southern Baptist Convention we have debated the abortion issue and we have passed strong resolutions opposing abortion and affirming the sanctity of human life. From our pulpits we have condemned the abortion clinics and opposed abortion vociferously. But the carnage continues!
Resolutions and eloquent preachments alone will not stop the abortion holocaust. Although not the total solution, a human life amendment is imperative if this avalanche of human carnage is to be stemmed.
See more here:
'Assure the right to life': Lewis urges Southern Baptists to support pro-life amendment in US Constitution - The Pathway
- Karen Read accused of weaponizing Fifth Amendment by seeking to delay civil trial - CBS Boston - October 31st, 2024 [October 31st, 2024]
- Mother and grandmother of Willacy County murder victim invoke Fifth Amendment during trial - KRGV - August 20th, 2024 [August 20th, 2024]
- This Is What the Twenty-fifth Amendment Was Designed For - The New Yorker - July 4th, 2024 [July 4th, 2024]
- Young Thug trial: State witness held in contempt, taken into custody - The Atlanta Journal Constitution - June 12th, 2024 [June 12th, 2024]
- That's Not How Pleading The Fifth Works - Above the Law - June 12th, 2024 [June 12th, 2024]
- Why was Lil Woody arrested? Rapper invokes Fifth Amendment against self-incrimination to avoid testifying in Young ... - Sportskeeda - June 12th, 2024 [June 12th, 2024]
- New Ad Taunts Trump: 'Take the Stand, Donald, or Admit You're a Coward' - The New York Times - May 18th, 2024 [May 18th, 2024]
- How Democrats In Arizona Are Damaging The Fifth Amendment - The Daily Wire - May 1st, 2024 [May 1st, 2024]
- Social Media Platforms Have Property Rights Too - Reason - April 16th, 2024 [April 16th, 2024]
- Utah high court rules suspects don't have to provide police with phone passcodes - The Record from Recorded Future News - December 21st, 2023 [December 21st, 2023]
- Utah Supreme Court says accused don't have to share cellphone passwords with police - Salt Lake Tribune - December 21st, 2023 [December 21st, 2023]
- High court must uphold constitutional taking clause to protect ... - The Midwest Center for Investigative Reporting - November 9th, 2023 [November 9th, 2023]
- Jump Crypto chief pled Fifth over alleged backroom Do Kwon deal - Protos - November 9th, 2023 [November 9th, 2023]
- Donald Trump civil trial in Manhattan: Maybe he's not trying to win ... - Slate - November 9th, 2023 [November 9th, 2023]
- Commission weighs whether to discipline Illinois judge who ... - St. Louis Post-Dispatch - November 9th, 2023 [November 9th, 2023]
- Smith Sentenced To Probation In Break-In At Sheriff's Residence - wkdzradio.com - November 9th, 2023 [November 9th, 2023]
- SCOTUS accepts 43 cases this term; 20 scheduled for argument so ... - Ballotpedia News - November 9th, 2023 [November 9th, 2023]
- Movie Review - Anatomy of a Fall | The-m-report | wboc.com - WBOC TV 16 - November 9th, 2023 [November 9th, 2023]
- Another Result Before It Happens: The Trump Civil Case In New York - Above the Law - November 9th, 2023 [November 9th, 2023]
- The inherent American rights involved during and after an arrest - FOX 29 - June 15th, 2023 [June 15th, 2023]
- She was killed walking home. Two men are now on trial for her ... - CBS 6 News Richmond WTVR - June 15th, 2023 [June 15th, 2023]
- Are Abortion Bans Takings? - Reason - June 15th, 2023 [June 15th, 2023]
- Ex-San Francisco Official Offers Alibi for One of Series of Bear-Spray ... - The San Francisco Standard - June 15th, 2023 [June 15th, 2023]
- Road project threatens preserved farmland | News | dailycourier.com - Front Page - June 15th, 2023 [June 15th, 2023]
- Teacher, accused of seven felonies, pleads his case to Grand Island ... - Grand Island Independent - June 15th, 2023 [June 15th, 2023]
- "That is a crime of cinema": After Saving Vin Diesel's Career With an ... - FandomWire - June 15th, 2023 [June 15th, 2023]
- There Is No 'Moving On' From Corruption, by Laura Hollis - Creators Syndicate - June 15th, 2023 [June 15th, 2023]
- Left-wing Democrats Running Roughshod Over Constitutional ... - The New York Sun - June 15th, 2023 [June 15th, 2023]
- Tether SEC Action? USDT Selling Floods Liquidity Pools in Wake of ... - CCN.com - June 15th, 2023 [June 15th, 2023]
- Essential Education: Professor, attorney discuss importance of ... - LA Downtown News Online - June 4th, 2023 [June 4th, 2023]
- Inside The Murder Of Kristin Smart And How Her Killer Was Caught - All That's Interesting - June 4th, 2023 [June 4th, 2023]
- Louisiana's Sabine River Authority Not Entitled To Sovereign Immunity - The Energy Law Blog - May 27th, 2023 [May 27th, 2023]
- Ken Paxton Impeached on 20 Charges Including Bribery ... - The Texan - May 27th, 2023 [May 27th, 2023]
- Don Carmignani Recounts Brutal Beating From Witness Stand - The San Francisco Standard - May 27th, 2023 [May 27th, 2023]
- Simply losing it: Bitter fight brews over federal judges forced retirement effort - Yahoo! Voices - May 27th, 2023 [May 27th, 2023]
- Trump Organization finishes last in brand reputation survey for second straight year - The Hill - May 27th, 2023 [May 27th, 2023]
- Jekyll Island Authority board names new director | Local News ... - Brunswick News - May 27th, 2023 [May 27th, 2023]
- They held down a Black teen who tried to shoplift. He died from ... - Wisconsin Examiner - May 27th, 2023 [May 27th, 2023]
- Police officer charged with obstruction for allegedly leaking information to Proud Boys leader - WAPT Jackson - May 20th, 2023 [May 20th, 2023]
- Deputies ordered to answer questions about knowledge of gangs in LA County Sheriffs Department - Daily Breeze - May 20th, 2023 [May 20th, 2023]
- The 1950s Hollywood Blacklist Was an Assault on Free Expression - Jacobin magazine - May 20th, 2023 [May 20th, 2023]
- Will There Finally be Some Development on the Land Condemned ... - Reason - May 8th, 2023 [May 8th, 2023]
- Justice Scalia's Unpublished Dissent in Kelo v. City of New London - Reason - May 8th, 2023 [May 8th, 2023]
- Jurors to continue deliberations in trial for Woodson man accused of ... - Northwest Arkansas Democrat-Gazette - May 8th, 2023 [May 8th, 2023]
- The Red Scare Led to One of the Greatest Westerns of All Time - Collider - May 8th, 2023 [May 8th, 2023]
- The Ghost of Ayn Rand as a Climate Activist? - InDepthNH.org - May 8th, 2023 [May 8th, 2023]
- Florida oversight board sues Walt Disney Company in ongoing legal ... - JURIST - May 8th, 2023 [May 8th, 2023]
- Suspended gynecologist accused of getting aroused during vaginal deliveries faces massive lawsuit from dozens of women - Law & Crime - May 8th, 2023 [May 8th, 2023]
- Suffolk grand jury could bring criminal charges against CPS workers in Thomas Valva child-abuse case - Newsday - May 8th, 2023 [May 8th, 2023]
- Trump will answer questions in New York fraud lawsuit, lawyer says - Daily Herald - April 13th, 2023 [April 13th, 2023]
- Why the Founding Fathers passed the Fourth Amendment to the ... - Tennessean - April 13th, 2023 [April 13th, 2023]
- Appeals court rejects Peter Navarro's bid to retain hundreds of ... - POLITICO - April 13th, 2023 [April 13th, 2023]
- In Proud Boys Jan. 6 Sedition Trial, FBI Informants Abound - The New York Times - March 28th, 2023 [March 28th, 2023]
- Supreme Court Should Take and Reverse Fifth Circuit Decision that ... - Reason - March 28th, 2023 [March 28th, 2023]
- Court Action Underscores Peril for Trump in Documents Investigation - The New York Times - March 28th, 2023 [March 28th, 2023]
- CINCINNATI FINANCIAL CORP : Creation of a Direct Financial Obligation or an Obligation under an Off-Balance Sheet Arrangement of a Registrant,... - March 28th, 2023 [March 28th, 2023]
- Hartselle police: Chiropractor ingested lead to allay suspicion - Yahoo! Voices - March 28th, 2023 [March 28th, 2023]
- Georgia judge orders Fulton County DA to respond to Trumps motion seeking to quash grand jury report - Yahoo News - March 28th, 2023 [March 28th, 2023]
- Missing Franklin woman's children await answers on 2-year ... - WDJT - March 28th, 2023 [March 28th, 2023]
- Congressional oversight of the Trump International Hotel, civil rights ... - SCOTUSblog - March 28th, 2023 [March 28th, 2023]
- Rajya Sabha adjourned for the day over opposition protest - The Economic Times - March 28th, 2023 [March 28th, 2023]
- Why Civil Asset Forfeitures Need To End And Soon Could - Forbes - March 28th, 2023 [March 28th, 2023]
- The Dangerous Journey of John Eastman - Washington Monthly - March 28th, 2023 [March 28th, 2023]
- The Speaker Gets to do What he Wants to do,' Michael Madigan is Heard Saying at Secretly Recorded Leadership Meeting - NBC Chicago - March 28th, 2023 [March 28th, 2023]
- Letter to the editor: Rent control is government intrusion - Press Herald - March 28th, 2023 [March 28th, 2023]
- 1 year after FreeFall tragedy: Where the criminal investigation stands - WESH 2 Orlando - March 28th, 2023 [March 28th, 2023]
- Lange Refuses to Stop Demolition of Strizheus House, But Says City ... - Dakota Free Press - March 28th, 2023 [March 28th, 2023]
- Form 10-K Evolve Transition Infras For: Dec 31 - StreetInsider.com - March 28th, 2023 [March 28th, 2023]
- 11 exonerated men sue city detective Reynald Guevara - CBS News - March 28th, 2023 [March 28th, 2023]
- California man charged with felony cocaine possession at airport - Idaho Mountain Express and Guide - March 28th, 2023 [March 28th, 2023]
- Alex Murdaugh and whether to testify in your own defense - ABA Journal - March 28th, 2023 [March 28th, 2023]
- B.C. 'pump and dump' defendants' assets can be frozen by SEC - Vancouver Is Awesome - March 28th, 2023 [March 28th, 2023]
- self-incrimination | Wex | US Law | LII / Legal Information Institute - March 14th, 2023 [March 14th, 2023]
- TeraWulf Inc. Enters into the Fifth Amendment to Its Loan, Guaranty and Security Agreement - Marketscreener.com - March 14th, 2023 [March 14th, 2023]
- Tmc the Metals Company Inc. Enters into Fifth Amendment to Pilot Mining Test Agreement and Third Amendment to Strategic Alliance Agreement, Which Is... - February 24th, 2023 [February 24th, 2023]
- THE OTHER SIDE: Orange Jesus took the Fifth - theberkshireedge.com - October 5th, 2022 [October 5th, 2022]
- Hillary Clinton remixes Trump's 'lock her up' chant with DOJ probe remarks - MSNBC - September 13th, 2022 [September 13th, 2022]
- LETTERS TO THE EDITOR: Election issues and Trump GOP choice - Independent Tribune - September 13th, 2022 [September 13th, 2022]
- Sen. Rick Scott exemplifies the politics of pouting | Column - Tampa Bay Times - September 13th, 2022 [September 13th, 2022]
- The goal is to end open-field burning by growers success may be in the air - The Bakersfield Californian - September 13th, 2022 [September 13th, 2022]