Twenty-fifth Amendment to the United States Constitution – Wikipedia
The Twenty-fifth Amendment (Amendment XXV) to the United States Constitution deals with succession to the Presidency and establishes procedures both for filling a vacancy in the office of the Vice President, as well as responding to Presidential disabilities. It supersedes the ambiguous wording of Article II, Section 1, Clause 6 of the Constitution, which does not expressly state whether the Vice President becomes the President or Acting President if the President dies, resigns, is removed from office or is otherwise unable to discharge the powers of the presidency.[1] The Twenty-fifth Amendment was adopted on February 10, 1967.[2]
Section 1. In case of the removal of the President from office or of his death or resignation, the Vice President shall become President.
Section 2. Whenever there is a vacancy in the office of the Vice President, the President shall nominate a Vice President who shall take office upon confirmation by a majority vote of both Houses of Congress.
Section 3. Whenever the President transmits to the President pro tempore of the Senate and the Speaker of the House of Representatives his written declaration that he is unable to discharge the powers and duties of his office, and until he transmits to them a written declaration to the contrary, such powers and duties shall be discharged by the Vice President as Acting President.
Section 4. Whenever the Vice President and a majority of either the principal officers of the executive departments or of such other body as Congress may by law provide, transmit to the President pro tempore of the Senate and the Speaker of the House of Representatives their written declaration that the President is unable to discharge the powers and duties of his office, the Vice President shall immediately assume the powers and duties of the office as Acting President.
Thereafter, when the President transmits to the President pro tempore of the Senate and the Speaker of the House of Representatives his written declaration that no inability exists, he shall resume the powers and duties of his office unless the Vice President and a majority of either the principal officers of the executive department or of such other body as Congress may by law provide, transmit within four days to the President pro tempore of the Senate and the Speaker of the House of Representatives their written declaration that the President is unable to discharge the powers and duties of his office. Thereupon Congress shall decide the issue, assembling within forty-eight hours for that purpose if not in session. If the Congress, within twenty-one days after receipt of the latter written declaration, or, if Congress is not in session, within twenty-one days after Congress is required to assemble, determines by two-thirds vote of both Houses that the President is unable to discharge the powers and duties of his office, the Vice President shall continue to discharge the same as Acting President; otherwise, the President shall resume the powers and duties of his office.[3]
Article II, Section 1, Clause 6 of the Constitution states:
In Case of the Removal of the President from Office, or of his Death, Resignation, or Inability to discharge the Powers and Duties of the said Office, the Same shall devolve on the Vice President, and the Congress may by Law provide for the Case of Removal, Death, Resignation or Inability, both of the President and Vice President, declaring what Officer shall then act as President, and such Officer shall act accordingly, until the Disability be removed, or a President shall be elected.
That clause was unclear regarding Presidential succession and inability; it did not state who had the power to declare a President incapacitated.[1] Also, it did not provide a mechanism for filling a Vice Presidential vacancy prior to the next Presidential election. The vagueness of this clause caused difficulties many times before the Twenty-fifth Amendment's adoption:
President Dwight D. Eisenhower attempted to clarify procedures through a signed agreement with Vice President Richard Nixon, drafted by Attorney General Herbert Brownell Jr.. However, this agreement did not have the authority of a constitutional amendment.[9]
All of these incidents made it evident that clearer guidelines were needed.[1] There were two proposals for providing those guidelines.
In 1963, Senator Kenneth Keating of New York proposed a Constitutional amendment which would have enabled Congress to enact legislation providing for how to determine when a President is "unable to discharge the powers and duties of his office", rather than, as the Twenty-fifth Amendment does, having the Constitution so provide.[10] This proposal was based upon a recommendation of the American Bar Association in 1960.[11]
The text of the proposal read:[12]
In case of the removal of the President from office or of his death or resignation, the said office shall devolve on the Vice President. In case of the inability of the President to discharge the powers and duties of the said office, the said powers and duties shall devolve on the Vice President, until the inability be removed. The Congress may by law provide for the case of removal, death, resignation or inability, both of the President and Vice President, declaring what officer shall then be President, or, in case of inability, act as President, and such officer shall be or act as President accordingly, until a President shall be elected or, in case of inability, until the inability shall be earlier removed. The commencement and termination of any inability shall be determined by such method as Congress shall by law provide.
Senators raised concerns that the Congress could either abuse such authority[13] or neglect to enact any such legislation after the adoption of this proposal.[14]Tennessee Senator Estes Kefauver, the Chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee's Subcommittee on Constitutional Amendments, a long-time advocate for addressing the disability question, spearheaded the effort until he died of a heart attack on August 10, 1963.[15][16] Senator Keating was defeated in the 1964 election, but Senator Roman Hruska of Nebraska took up Keating's cause as a new member of the Subcommittee on Constitutional Amendments.[9]
The assassination of John F. Kennedy showed the need for a clear way for determining presidential disability in the context of the Cold War.[17] The new President, Lyndon B. Johnson, had once suffered a heart attack,[18] and the next two people in line for the presidency were the 71-year-old Speaker of the House John McCormack,[17][19] and the 86-year-old Senate President pro tempore Carl Hayden.[17][19] Senator Birch Bayh succeeded Kefauver as Chairman of the Subcommittee on Constitutional Amendments and set about advocating for a detailed amendment dealing with presidential disability.[17]
On January 6, 1965, Senator Birch Bayh proposed S. J. Res. 1 in the Senate and Representative Emanuel Celler (Chairman of the House Judiciary Committee) proposed H. J. Res. 1 in the House of Representatives. Their proposal specified the process by which a President could be declared "unable to discharge the powers and duties of his office", thereby making the Vice President an Acting President, and how the President could regain the powers of his office. Also, their proposal provided a way to fill a vacancy in the office of Vice President before the next presidential election. This was as opposed to the KeatingKefauver proposal, which neither provided for filling a vacancy in the office of Vice President prior to the next presidential election nor provided a process for determining presidential disability. In 1964, the American Bar Association endorsed the type of proposal which Bayh and Celler advocated.[20] On January 28, 1965, President Johnson endorsed S. J. Res. 1 in a statement to Congress.[9] Their proposal received bipartisan support.[21]
On February 19, the Senate passed the amendment, but the House passed a different version of the amendment on April 13. On April 22, it was returned to the Senate with revisions.[9] There were four areas of disagreement between the House and Senate versions:
On July 6, after a conference committee ironed out differences between the versions,[22] the final version of the amendment was passed by both Houses of the Congress and presented to the states for ratification.[23]
The Congress proposed the Twenty-fifth Amendment on July 6, 1965, and the amendment was ratified by the following states:[2]
The following states have not ratified the amendment:
Just six days after its submission, Nebraska and Wisconsin were the first states to ratify the amendment. On February 10, 1967, Minnesota and Nevada were the 37th and 38th states to ratify, respectively. On February 23, 1967, in a ceremony in the East Room of the White House, General Services Administrator Lawson Knott certified the amendment's adoption.
Section 1 codified the "Tyler Precedent" regarding when a President is removed from office, dies, or resigns. In any of these situations, the Vice President immediately becomes President.
Prior to the Twenty-fifth Amendment's adoption, a Vice Presidential vacancy remained until the start of the next presidential term. The Vice Presidency has been vacant several times due to death, resignation, or succession to the Presidency. Often these vacancies lasted for several years.
Under Section 2, whenever there is a vacancy in the office of Vice President, the President nominates a successor who becomes Vice President if confirmed by a majority vote of both Houses of the Congress.
Section 3 provides that when the President transmits a written declaration to the President pro tempore of the Senate and the Speaker of the House of Representatives, stating that he is unable to discharge the powers and duties of the Presidency, and until the President sends another written declaration to the aforementioned officers declaring himself able to resume discharging those powers and duties, the Vice President discharges those powers and duties as Acting President.
Section 4 is the only part of the amendment that has never been invoked.[25] It allows the Vice President, together with a "majority of either the principal officers of the executive departments or of such other body as Congress may by law provide", to declare the President "unable to discharge the powers and duties of his office" by submitting a written declaration to the President pro tempore of the Senate and the Speaker of the House of Representatives. As with Section 3, the Vice President would become Acting President.
Section 4 is meant to be invoked should the President's incapacitation prevent him from discharging his duties, but he is unable or unwilling to provide the written declaration called for by Section 3. The President may resume exercising the Presidential duties by sending a written declaration to the President pro tempore and the Speaker of the House.
Should the Vice President and Cabinet believe the President is still "unable to discharge the powers and duties of his office", they may within four days of the President's declaration submit another declaration that the President is incapacitated. If not already in session, the Congress must then assemble within 48 hours. The Congress has 21 days to decide the issue. If within the 21 days two-thirds of each house of Congress vote that the President is incapacitated, the Vice President would "continue" to be Acting President. Should the Congress resolve the issue in favor of the President, or make no decision within the 21 days allotted, then the President would "resume" discharging the powers and duties of his office. The use of the words "continue" and "resume" imply that the Vice President remains Acting President while Congress deliberates.
However, the President may again submit a written declaration of recovery to the President pro tempore and the Speaker of the House. That declaration could be responded to by the Acting President and the Cabinet in the same way as stated earlier. The specified 21-day Congressional procedure would start again.
The Twenty-fifth Amendment has been invoked six times since its ratification. The first three times were applications of Sections 1 and 2 in the context of scandals surrounding the Nixon Administration. The latter three were applications of Section 3 in connection to the President's undergoing a medical procedure requiring general anesthesia.
On October 12, 1973, following Vice President Spiro Agnew's resignation two days earlier, President Richard Nixon nominated Representative Gerald Ford of Michigan to succeed Agnew as Vice President.
The United States Senate voted 923 to confirm Ford on November 27 and, on December 6, the House of Representatives did the same by a vote of 38735. Ford was sworn in later that day before a joint session of the United States Congress.[26]
President Richard Nixon resigned on August 9, 1974, resulting in Vice President Gerald Ford succeeding to the office of President.[27] Gerald Ford is the only person ever to be Vice President, and later President, without being elected to either office.[28]
When Gerald Ford became President, the office of Vice President became vacant. On August 20, 1974, after considering Melvin Laird and George H. W. Bush, President Ford nominated former New York Governor Nelson Rockefeller to be the new vice president.
On December 10, 1974, Rockefeller was confirmed 907 by the Senate. On December 19, 1974, Rockefeller was confirmed 287128 by the House and sworn into office later that day in the Senate chamber.[26]
On July 12, 1985, President Ronald Reagan underwent a colonoscopy, during which a pre-cancerous lesion called a villous adenoma was discovered. Upon being told by his physician (Dr. Edward Cattow) that he could undergo surgery immediately or in two to three weeks, Reagan elected to have it removed immediately.
That afternoon, Reagan consulted with White House counsel Fred Fielding by telephone, debating whether to invoke the amendment and, if so, whether such a transfer would set an undesirable precedent. Fielding and White House Chief of Staff Donald Regan recommended that Reagan transfer power and two letters doing so were drafted: the first letter specifically invoked Section 3 of the Twenty-fifth Amendment; the second only mentioned that Reagan was mindful of this provision. At 10:32a.m. on July 13, Reagan signed the second letter and ordered its delivery to the appropriate officers as required under the amendment.[29]
Books such as The President Has Been Shot: Confusion, Disability and the 25th Amendment, by Herbert Abrams, and Reagan's autobiography, An American Life, argue President Reagan's intent to transfer power to Vice President Bush was clear. Fielding himself adds:
I personally know he did intend to invoke the amendment, and he conveyed that to all of his staff and it was conveyed to the VP as well as the President of the Senate. He was also very firm in his wish not to create a precedent binding his successor.
On June 29, 2002, President George W. Bush underwent a colonoscopy and chose to invoke Section 3 of the amendment, temporarily transferring his powers to Vice President Dick Cheney. The medical procedure began at 7:09a.m. EDT and ended at 7:29a.m. EDT. Bush woke up twenty minutes later, but did not resume his presidential powers and duties until 9:24a.m. EDT after the president's doctor, Richard Tubb, conducted an overall examination. Tubb said he recommended the additional time to make sure the sedative had no aftereffects. Unlike Reagan's 1985 letter, Bush's 2002 letter specifically cited Section 3 as the authority for the transfer of power.[29]
On July 21, 2007, President Bush again invoked Section 3 in response to having to undergo a colonoscopy, temporarily transferring his powers to Vice President Cheney. President Bush invoked Section 3 at 7:16a.m. EDT. He reclaimed his powers at 9:21a.m. EDT. As happened in 2002, Bush specifically cited Section 3 when he transferred the Presidential powers to the Vice President and when he reclaimed those powers.[29]
There are two documented instances in which invocation of Section 4 of the Twenty-fifth Amendment was considered, both of which involved the 40th President of the United States, Ronald Reagan.
Following the attempted assassination of Ronald Reagan on March 30, 1981, Vice President George H. W. Bush did not assume the presidential powers and duties as Acting President. Reagan was unable to invoke Section 3, because he was in surgery. Bush did not invoke Section 4, because he was on a plane returning from Texas. Reagan was out of surgery by the time Bush arrived in Washington.[30] In 1995, Birch Bayh, the primary sponsor of the amendment in the Senate, wrote that Section 4 should have been invoked.[31]
Upon becoming the White House Chief of Staff in 1987, Howard Baker was advised by his predecessor's staff to be prepared for a possible invocation of the Twenty-fifth Amendment[32] due to Reagan's perceived laziness and ineptitude.[33][34]
According to the PBS program American Experience,
What Baker's transition team was told by Donald Regan's staff that weekend shocked them. Reagan was "inattentive, inept", and "lazy", and Baker should be prepared to invoke the 25th Amendment to relieve him of his duties.
Reagan biographer Edmund Morris stated in an interview aired on the program,
The incoming Baker people all decided to have a meeting with him on Monday, their first official meeting with the President, and to cluster around the table in the Cabinet room and watch him very, very closely to see how he behaved, to see if he was indeed losing his mental grip.
Morris went on to explain,
Reagan who was, of course, completely unaware that they were launching a death watch on him, came in stimulated by the press of all these new people and performed splendidly. At the end of the meeting, they figuratively threw up their hands realizing he was in perfect command of himself.[33][34]
Read more:
Twenty-fifth Amendment to the United States Constitution - Wikipedia
- Ex-IU doctor Brad Bomba Sr. invoked Fifth Amendment 45 times in deposition over alleged abuse - Yahoo! Voices - December 18th, 2024 [December 18th, 2024]
- President Muizzu ratifies the fifth amendment to the Criminal Procedure Act - The Edition - December 18th, 2024 [December 18th, 2024]
- Doctor accused of abusing Indiana University athletes repeatedly invokes Fifth Amendment in deposition - NBC News - December 16th, 2024 [December 16th, 2024]
- Ex-IU doctor Brad Bomba Sr. invoked Fifth Amendment 45 times in deposition over alleged abuse - The Herald-Times - December 16th, 2024 [December 16th, 2024]
- The Constitution: The Twenty-Fifth Amendment - Houston Public Media - November 28th, 2024 [November 28th, 2024]
- Karen Read accused of weaponizing Fifth Amendment by seeking to delay civil trial - CBS Boston - October 31st, 2024 [October 31st, 2024]
- Mother and grandmother of Willacy County murder victim invoke Fifth Amendment during trial - KRGV - August 20th, 2024 [August 20th, 2024]
- This Is What the Twenty-fifth Amendment Was Designed For - The New Yorker - July 4th, 2024 [July 4th, 2024]
- Young Thug trial: State witness held in contempt, taken into custody - The Atlanta Journal Constitution - June 12th, 2024 [June 12th, 2024]
- That's Not How Pleading The Fifth Works - Above the Law - June 12th, 2024 [June 12th, 2024]
- Why was Lil Woody arrested? Rapper invokes Fifth Amendment against self-incrimination to avoid testifying in Young ... - Sportskeeda - June 12th, 2024 [June 12th, 2024]
- New Ad Taunts Trump: 'Take the Stand, Donald, or Admit You're a Coward' - The New York Times - May 18th, 2024 [May 18th, 2024]
- How Democrats In Arizona Are Damaging The Fifth Amendment - The Daily Wire - May 1st, 2024 [May 1st, 2024]
- Social Media Platforms Have Property Rights Too - Reason - April 16th, 2024 [April 16th, 2024]
- Utah high court rules suspects don't have to provide police with phone passcodes - The Record from Recorded Future News - December 21st, 2023 [December 21st, 2023]
- Utah Supreme Court says accused don't have to share cellphone passwords with police - Salt Lake Tribune - December 21st, 2023 [December 21st, 2023]
- High court must uphold constitutional taking clause to protect ... - The Midwest Center for Investigative Reporting - November 9th, 2023 [November 9th, 2023]
- Jump Crypto chief pled Fifth over alleged backroom Do Kwon deal - Protos - November 9th, 2023 [November 9th, 2023]
- Donald Trump civil trial in Manhattan: Maybe he's not trying to win ... - Slate - November 9th, 2023 [November 9th, 2023]
- Commission weighs whether to discipline Illinois judge who ... - St. Louis Post-Dispatch - November 9th, 2023 [November 9th, 2023]
- Smith Sentenced To Probation In Break-In At Sheriff's Residence - wkdzradio.com - November 9th, 2023 [November 9th, 2023]
- SCOTUS accepts 43 cases this term; 20 scheduled for argument so ... - Ballotpedia News - November 9th, 2023 [November 9th, 2023]
- Movie Review - Anatomy of a Fall | The-m-report | wboc.com - WBOC TV 16 - November 9th, 2023 [November 9th, 2023]
- Another Result Before It Happens: The Trump Civil Case In New York - Above the Law - November 9th, 2023 [November 9th, 2023]
- The inherent American rights involved during and after an arrest - FOX 29 - June 15th, 2023 [June 15th, 2023]
- She was killed walking home. Two men are now on trial for her ... - CBS 6 News Richmond WTVR - June 15th, 2023 [June 15th, 2023]
- Are Abortion Bans Takings? - Reason - June 15th, 2023 [June 15th, 2023]
- Ex-San Francisco Official Offers Alibi for One of Series of Bear-Spray ... - The San Francisco Standard - June 15th, 2023 [June 15th, 2023]
- Road project threatens preserved farmland | News | dailycourier.com - Front Page - June 15th, 2023 [June 15th, 2023]
- Teacher, accused of seven felonies, pleads his case to Grand Island ... - Grand Island Independent - June 15th, 2023 [June 15th, 2023]
- "That is a crime of cinema": After Saving Vin Diesel's Career With an ... - FandomWire - June 15th, 2023 [June 15th, 2023]
- There Is No 'Moving On' From Corruption, by Laura Hollis - Creators Syndicate - June 15th, 2023 [June 15th, 2023]
- Left-wing Democrats Running Roughshod Over Constitutional ... - The New York Sun - June 15th, 2023 [June 15th, 2023]
- Tether SEC Action? USDT Selling Floods Liquidity Pools in Wake of ... - CCN.com - June 15th, 2023 [June 15th, 2023]
- Essential Education: Professor, attorney discuss importance of ... - LA Downtown News Online - June 4th, 2023 [June 4th, 2023]
- Inside The Murder Of Kristin Smart And How Her Killer Was Caught - All That's Interesting - June 4th, 2023 [June 4th, 2023]
- Louisiana's Sabine River Authority Not Entitled To Sovereign Immunity - The Energy Law Blog - May 27th, 2023 [May 27th, 2023]
- Ken Paxton Impeached on 20 Charges Including Bribery ... - The Texan - May 27th, 2023 [May 27th, 2023]
- Don Carmignani Recounts Brutal Beating From Witness Stand - The San Francisco Standard - May 27th, 2023 [May 27th, 2023]
- Simply losing it: Bitter fight brews over federal judges forced retirement effort - Yahoo! Voices - May 27th, 2023 [May 27th, 2023]
- Trump Organization finishes last in brand reputation survey for second straight year - The Hill - May 27th, 2023 [May 27th, 2023]
- Jekyll Island Authority board names new director | Local News ... - Brunswick News - May 27th, 2023 [May 27th, 2023]
- They held down a Black teen who tried to shoplift. He died from ... - Wisconsin Examiner - May 27th, 2023 [May 27th, 2023]
- Police officer charged with obstruction for allegedly leaking information to Proud Boys leader - WAPT Jackson - May 20th, 2023 [May 20th, 2023]
- Deputies ordered to answer questions about knowledge of gangs in LA County Sheriffs Department - Daily Breeze - May 20th, 2023 [May 20th, 2023]
- The 1950s Hollywood Blacklist Was an Assault on Free Expression - Jacobin magazine - May 20th, 2023 [May 20th, 2023]
- Will There Finally be Some Development on the Land Condemned ... - Reason - May 8th, 2023 [May 8th, 2023]
- Justice Scalia's Unpublished Dissent in Kelo v. City of New London - Reason - May 8th, 2023 [May 8th, 2023]
- Jurors to continue deliberations in trial for Woodson man accused of ... - Northwest Arkansas Democrat-Gazette - May 8th, 2023 [May 8th, 2023]
- The Red Scare Led to One of the Greatest Westerns of All Time - Collider - May 8th, 2023 [May 8th, 2023]
- The Ghost of Ayn Rand as a Climate Activist? - InDepthNH.org - May 8th, 2023 [May 8th, 2023]
- Florida oversight board sues Walt Disney Company in ongoing legal ... - JURIST - May 8th, 2023 [May 8th, 2023]
- Suspended gynecologist accused of getting aroused during vaginal deliveries faces massive lawsuit from dozens of women - Law & Crime - May 8th, 2023 [May 8th, 2023]
- Suffolk grand jury could bring criminal charges against CPS workers in Thomas Valva child-abuse case - Newsday - May 8th, 2023 [May 8th, 2023]
- Trump will answer questions in New York fraud lawsuit, lawyer says - Daily Herald - April 13th, 2023 [April 13th, 2023]
- Why the Founding Fathers passed the Fourth Amendment to the ... - Tennessean - April 13th, 2023 [April 13th, 2023]
- Appeals court rejects Peter Navarro's bid to retain hundreds of ... - POLITICO - April 13th, 2023 [April 13th, 2023]
- In Proud Boys Jan. 6 Sedition Trial, FBI Informants Abound - The New York Times - March 28th, 2023 [March 28th, 2023]
- Supreme Court Should Take and Reverse Fifth Circuit Decision that ... - Reason - March 28th, 2023 [March 28th, 2023]
- Court Action Underscores Peril for Trump in Documents Investigation - The New York Times - March 28th, 2023 [March 28th, 2023]
- CINCINNATI FINANCIAL CORP : Creation of a Direct Financial Obligation or an Obligation under an Off-Balance Sheet Arrangement of a Registrant,... - March 28th, 2023 [March 28th, 2023]
- Hartselle police: Chiropractor ingested lead to allay suspicion - Yahoo! Voices - March 28th, 2023 [March 28th, 2023]
- Georgia judge orders Fulton County DA to respond to Trumps motion seeking to quash grand jury report - Yahoo News - March 28th, 2023 [March 28th, 2023]
- Missing Franklin woman's children await answers on 2-year ... - WDJT - March 28th, 2023 [March 28th, 2023]
- Congressional oversight of the Trump International Hotel, civil rights ... - SCOTUSblog - March 28th, 2023 [March 28th, 2023]
- Rajya Sabha adjourned for the day over opposition protest - The Economic Times - March 28th, 2023 [March 28th, 2023]
- Why Civil Asset Forfeitures Need To End And Soon Could - Forbes - March 28th, 2023 [March 28th, 2023]
- The Dangerous Journey of John Eastman - Washington Monthly - March 28th, 2023 [March 28th, 2023]
- The Speaker Gets to do What he Wants to do,' Michael Madigan is Heard Saying at Secretly Recorded Leadership Meeting - NBC Chicago - March 28th, 2023 [March 28th, 2023]
- Letter to the editor: Rent control is government intrusion - Press Herald - March 28th, 2023 [March 28th, 2023]
- 1 year after FreeFall tragedy: Where the criminal investigation stands - WESH 2 Orlando - March 28th, 2023 [March 28th, 2023]
- Lange Refuses to Stop Demolition of Strizheus House, But Says City ... - Dakota Free Press - March 28th, 2023 [March 28th, 2023]
- Form 10-K Evolve Transition Infras For: Dec 31 - StreetInsider.com - March 28th, 2023 [March 28th, 2023]
- 11 exonerated men sue city detective Reynald Guevara - CBS News - March 28th, 2023 [March 28th, 2023]
- California man charged with felony cocaine possession at airport - Idaho Mountain Express and Guide - March 28th, 2023 [March 28th, 2023]
- Alex Murdaugh and whether to testify in your own defense - ABA Journal - March 28th, 2023 [March 28th, 2023]
- B.C. 'pump and dump' defendants' assets can be frozen by SEC - Vancouver Is Awesome - March 28th, 2023 [March 28th, 2023]
- self-incrimination | Wex | US Law | LII / Legal Information Institute - March 14th, 2023 [March 14th, 2023]
- TeraWulf Inc. Enters into the Fifth Amendment to Its Loan, Guaranty and Security Agreement - Marketscreener.com - March 14th, 2023 [March 14th, 2023]
- Tmc the Metals Company Inc. Enters into Fifth Amendment to Pilot Mining Test Agreement and Third Amendment to Strategic Alliance Agreement, Which Is... - February 24th, 2023 [February 24th, 2023]