A First Amendment fight for the future of the internet – The Boston Globe
Storm was right about what it meant for him and his fellow creators of the app. That August, the US Treasury Department put Tornado Cash under harsh sanctions. Days later, officials in the Netherlands arrested codeveloper Alexey Pertsev. And a year later, the US Department of Justice indicted Storm and a third developer, Roman Semenov. They are charged with money laundering, violating US sanctions law, and operating an unlicensed money transmitter.
This May, a Dutch court found Pertsev guilty of money laundering and sentenced him to more than five years in prison. Semenov remains at large. Storms trial is scheduled to begin in September in New York. He faces up to 45 years behind bars.
Federal prosecutors say Storm helped the Lazarus Group launder money, even though they have presented no evidence he gave direct assistance. Storms defenders, who include blockchain technology advocates and the internet freedom group Electronic Frontier Foundation, say all he did was help create a software tool.
Storms lawyers say the First Amendment protects his actions, as for nearly three decades US courts have recognized software code as protected speech. At its heart, this prosecution represents an unprecedented attempt to criminalize the development of software, Storms lawyers argued in March in a motion to dismiss the indictment.
The dispute is technically and legally complex. But at its center is a long-running debate over whether software code is protected by the First Amendment. And the outcome could determine whether a new class of software is effectively off-limits for Americans.
In 1995, mathematician Daniel Bernstein sued the US Department of State. He said the government violated his First Amendment rights by requiring him to register as an arms dealer and apply for an export license before he could publish the source code for Snuffle, his encryption algorithm. A district court judge agreed with Bernstein, rejecting the governments argument that Snuffles code was conduct, not speech.
The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the lower courts decision in 1999. Several other lower court decisions in the late 1990s reached the same conclusion as in the Bernstein case. Judges viewed code as being like speech because it is written in a language and is a mode of communication its expressive.
But contrary to what many in the tech world seem to think, this legal matter isnt settled. In a dissent to the Ninth Circuits decision in Bernstein, Judge Thomas G. Nelson raised a compelling point: The basic function of encryption source code is to act as a method of controlling computers, he wrote. This functional aspect of encryption source code contains no expression; it is merely the tool used to build the encryption machine.
The code that runs Tornado Cash may be expressive, but it also functions. It instructs a blockchain network to anonymize cryptocurrency transactions by using advanced cryptography to untraceably transfer cryptocurrency from one software wallet to another. While the crypto is in the first wallet, it is linked to every transaction the wallet has ever participated in. In the second wallet, all that history is wiped away.
Crypto and privacy advocates are steadfast that encrypting transactions in this way has legitimate uses anonymous donations to a sensitive political cause, for instance. Like real cash, though, Tornado Cash also has illicit uses. The Lazarus Group used it to sweep away digital breadcrumbs that let investigators track criminal funds on blockchains.
What makes Tornado Cash new in the eyes of the law is that although Storm and the other developers knew the cryptocurrency thieves were using Tornado Cash, they couldnt stop the criminals. The core of the privacy tool is a set of smart contracts (a crypto term for software that runs on a blockchain) that no one, not even Tornado Cashs creators, can modify or shut down.
This is the whole point of blockchains: They operate free of the control of any single entity or person. Blockchain-based software can have built-in kill switches and ways for developers to make make upgrades, but the Tornado Cash developers chose to relinquish all control over the core application in 2020. They say their intention was to give cryptocurrency users privacy, not to help criminals.
Its really a question of whether you can be held criminally culpable for the bad things people do with the software you write, even if you didnt intend for them to do those bad things with that software, says Peter Van Valkenburgh, director of research at the policy advocacy group Coin Center, based in Washington, D.C.
In the Netherlands it appears the answer is yes, and Alexey Pertsev must spend more than five years in prison for it. The US Constitution makes Roman Storms case more complicated.
The sanctions law Storm allegedly broke is called the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA). Passed in 1976, it gives the president powers to regulate international commerce in the name of national security. In 1988, Congress amended IEEPA to clarify that the president cannot block the international exchange of First Amendment-protected items including books, music, artwork, and other informational materials. This update became known as the Berman Amendments.
Storms defense team has argued that the Tornado Cash software qualifies as informational materials under the Berman Amendments. And even if that law doesnt protect Storm, they argue that the First Amendment does.
The government responds that much of Storms defense rests on a simplistic notion: that he should not be held criminally liable because his conduct involved computer software. That idea would have breathtakingly broad implications, prosecutors wrote in April in a filing with the court. For example, they said, it would keep the president from blocking an American bank with a foreign branch from doing business with a sanctioned person or group over banking software.
But the bank parallel doesnt work, argues Van Valkenburgh. Banks have legal relationships with their customers promises, guarantees, terms of service, etc. Those relationships are conduct (and not expressive conduct, like flag burning), he says, and the First Amendment doesnt prevent the government from regulating that conduct. The Tornado Cash developers had no such relationships with their users, Van Valkenburgh says. Crucially, they never took control of any user funds. As Van Valkenburgh sees it, the developers only conduct, in the legal sense, was publishing software without a backdoor that would let them control its use once it was out in the world.
The complexity of the Tornado Cash case makes it challenging to parse the arguments. But ultimately it is about who is responsible when a novel piece of software is used to break the law.
Therein lies the problem with the claim that code is speech.
If we assume all code is speech, any regulation of software will be vulnerable to a First Amendment challenge. Given the role that software plays in so many of our interactions today, thats not workable, says Xiangnong (George) Wang, a staff attorney at the Knight First Amendment Institute at Columbia University.
In a 2021 article in the Wisconsin Law Review, Wang argued that whether code is speech is no longer the right question for lawyers, judges, and lawmakers to consider. Its really about how its used, he says. What are the actual values at stake? Is it an attempt to participate in democratic discourse? To disseminate useful information to the public? Or is it to distribute a product? There wont always be clear-cut answers, Wang says. But as software becomes even more pervasive and complex even autonomous the public will have to decide what exactly the First Amendment should protect.
Decentralized software applications and AI make things even less clear-cut. But Storms lawyers are still betting they can lean hard into the First Amendment.
Van Valkenburghs organization, Coin Center, has argued that Storms choice to write and publish Tornado Cash is the expression of a powerful political and scientific viewpoint in and of itself. In other words, its arguing that systems like Tornado Cash should be allowed despite the governments distaste for them.
Some in the US Government may strongly have preferred that (the developers) would have published their code with a secret vulnerability or a backdoor for law enforcement, or simply not published their viewpoints at all, Coin Center said in brief supporting Storm. It added: The defendants cannot and should not be held liable for having merely published software as they saw fit.
Mike Orcutt is a founding editor at Project Glitch, a newsletter focused on the future of the internet. He was previously an editor at MIT Technology Review and The Block, a cryptocurrency news publication.
Read more:
A First Amendment fight for the future of the internet - The Boston Globe
- Most Americans can name only one right protected by the First Amendment, Annenberg survey finds - The Daily Pennsylvanian - September 19th, 2024 [September 19th, 2024]
- A Majority of Americans Cant Recall Most First Amendment Rights - The Annenberg Public Policy Center of the University of Pennsylvania - September 19th, 2024 [September 19th, 2024]
- Can you list all the First Amendment rights? Only 7% of Americans can, poll finds - Miami Herald - September 19th, 2024 [September 19th, 2024]
- Todays TikTok Appeal Pressure Tests The First Amendment - Forrester - September 19th, 2024 [September 19th, 2024]
- Heres what to know about free speech protections outlined by the First Amendment - Fort Worth Star-Telegram - September 19th, 2024 [September 19th, 2024]
- DC Circuit skeptical of TikToks First Amendment effort to stave off looming ban - Courthouse News Service - September 19th, 2024 [September 19th, 2024]
- Can candidates lie & get away with it? See if First Amendment rules vary for GA elections - Columbus Ledger-Enquirer - September 19th, 2024 [September 19th, 2024]
- McConnell On The Judicial Bureaucracy And The First Amendment - Remark | Remarks | THE NEWSROOM | Republican Leader - September 19th, 2024 [September 19th, 2024]
- Mistreatment of Indian journalist in Texas may have violated First Amendment rights: NPC - Daily Excelsior - September 19th, 2024 [September 19th, 2024]
- University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Says Pro-Hamas Groups Threats Are Protected by First Amendment - Algemeiner - September 8th, 2024 [September 8th, 2024]
- State of the First Amendment Address to focus on free speech, free exercise and the establishment clause - UK College of Communication and Information - September 8th, 2024 [September 8th, 2024]
- Letter to the Editor: Defending our First Amendment rights - Daily Bulldog - September 8th, 2024 [September 8th, 2024]
- Opinion | Only the First Amendment Can Protect Students, Campuses and Speech - The New York Times - September 6th, 2024 [September 6th, 2024]
- The Growing Threat of State Domestic Terrorism Laws to the First Amendment - Just Security - September 6th, 2024 [September 6th, 2024]
- First Amendment or foreign interference? Jury to decide in federal trial of Uhuru members - WTSP.com - September 6th, 2024 [September 6th, 2024]
- State of the First Amendment Address to focus on free speech, free exercise and the establishment clause - UKNow - September 6th, 2024 [September 6th, 2024]
- Interpreting the First Amendment through an equality lens - University of Miami: News@theU - September 6th, 2024 [September 6th, 2024]
- Andrew Walker: The importance of the First Amendment - WORLD News Group - September 6th, 2024 [September 6th, 2024]
- Daily Herald opinion: Free speech and election politics: Chilling-sounding 'First Amendment Zones' pose a legitimate, not insurmountable, challenge... - September 6th, 2024 [September 6th, 2024]
- Phil Donahue: The man who brought robust talk to TV an interview with Ken Paulson about the man and his legacy First Amendment News 438 - Foundation... - September 6th, 2024 [September 6th, 2024]
- Private Universities That Reject First Amendment Principles Put Themselves At Legal Risk (Updated) - Reason - September 6th, 2024 [September 6th, 2024]
- Federal Judge Who Ruled Ald. Gardiner Violated First Amendment Admonishes Him for Approaching Her - WTTW News - September 2nd, 2024 [September 2nd, 2024]
- Law professors: Northwestern University must embrace the First Amendment standard of speech - Chicago Tribune - September 2nd, 2024 [September 2nd, 2024]
- Trump Says We Gotta Restrict the First Amendment - Rolling Stone - September 2nd, 2024 [September 2nd, 2024]
- Constitution Day speaker to discuss the First Amendment, 2024 Election - Fredonia.edu - September 2nd, 2024 [September 2nd, 2024]
- Does the First Amendment Protect A.I.? The Supreme Court May Soon Have Its Say. - Slate - September 2nd, 2024 [September 2nd, 2024]
- The First Amendment and practical implications of SEA 202 - Indiana Lawyer - September 2nd, 2024 [September 2nd, 2024]
- Arizona Woman Arrested for Exercising First Amendment Rights, Criticizing Public Official - Turning Point USA - September 2nd, 2024 [September 2nd, 2024]
- First Amendment / Second Amendment Lawyer Jobs in California - Reason - August 25th, 2024 [August 25th, 2024]
- Nashville mayor introduces legislation aimed at safety and protecting First Amendment rights - WSMV 4 - August 25th, 2024 [August 25th, 2024]
- A few reflections on the Benjamin Gitlow story as that landmark case nears its centennial anniversary First Amendment News 436 - Foundation for... - August 25th, 2024 [August 25th, 2024]
- 72 People Have Been Arrested Related to First Amendment Activities During the DNC, Including 3 Journalists - WTTW News - August 25th, 2024 [August 25th, 2024]
- 72 People Have Been Arrested Related to First Amendment Activities During the DNC, Including 3 Journalists WTTW (Chicago) - Wirepoints - August 25th, 2024 [August 25th, 2024]
- Europes outrageous attack on the First Amendment - Washington Examiner - August 20th, 2024 [August 20th, 2024]
- Who's for the First Amendment and who's against - Martinsburg Journal - August 20th, 2024 [August 20th, 2024]
- Catholic Charities asks Supreme Court to protect First Amendment rights in battle against the state - AOL - August 20th, 2024 [August 20th, 2024]
- Five ways the First Amendment protects your speech and three ways it does not - ACLU of DC - August 20th, 2024 [August 20th, 2024]
- Video Democrats can handle protests and protecting the First Amendment: Brandon Johnson - ABC News - August 20th, 2024 [August 20th, 2024]
- University I-Team launched, tasked with supporting First Amendment rights - Daily Illini - August 20th, 2024 [August 20th, 2024]
- TikTok fights the DOJ on the First Amendment, compares itself to these American news outlets - Fast Company - August 20th, 2024 [August 20th, 2024]
- Whose Bible (and First Amendment) is it, anyway? | Opinion - NJ.com - August 20th, 2024 [August 20th, 2024]
- Anti-abortion organizations claim N.Y. attorney general is violating First Amendment over info on treatment - Spectrum News - August 20th, 2024 [August 20th, 2024]
- In Response to City-Promoted Religious Walk: First Amendment Activist Proposes 'Chicken Wings, Piatas, and a Satanic Rave' - Tamarac Talk - August 20th, 2024 [August 20th, 2024]
- Pushing back against the state - WORLD News Group - July 14th, 2024 [July 14th, 2024]
- So to Speak Podcast Transcript: The First Amendment at the Supreme Court - Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression - July 14th, 2024 [July 14th, 2024]
- Ruling boosts social media free speech protections, some say - Roll Call - July 14th, 2024 [July 14th, 2024]
- Can the First Amendment Protect Americans From Government Censorship? - The New York Sun - July 14th, 2024 [July 14th, 2024]
- The aftermath of the Supreme Courts NetChoice ruling - The Verge - July 14th, 2024 [July 14th, 2024]
- Oklahoma Supreme Court ruling 'inconsistent' with First Amendment - ADF Media - June 25th, 2024 [June 25th, 2024]
- Gag orders and First Amendment rights - Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression - June 25th, 2024 [June 25th, 2024]
- Car shows, the First Amendment, and $30 - The Citizen.com - June 25th, 2024 [June 25th, 2024]
- ACLU lawsuit claims Rose Bud ordinance restricts First Amendment rights - KARK - June 25th, 2024 [June 25th, 2024]
- DOJ report on Phoenix PD contains guidance on First Amendment rights at protests - Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press - June 25th, 2024 [June 25th, 2024]
- Chicago Police Department Revises Plan to Handle Protests Around DNC After Reform Groups Object - WTTW News - June 25th, 2024 [June 25th, 2024]
- Is Promotion of Free Services "Commercial Speech" for First Amendment Purposes? - Reason - June 20th, 2024 [June 20th, 2024]
- Opinion | Alito comments threaten the First Amendment - The Washington Post - The Washington Post - June 20th, 2024 [June 20th, 2024]
- Six West Virginia Schools Notified of First Amendment Violations in Student Handbooks - WV News - June 20th, 2024 [June 20th, 2024]
- Missouri AG joins 23 states to defend Trump's First Amendment rights - kttn - June 20th, 2024 [June 20th, 2024]
- Voting assistance covered by First Amendment, say plaintiffs in absentee ballot case Alabama Reflector - Alabama Reflector - June 20th, 2024 [June 20th, 2024]
- ACLU Urges Six WV Schools to Review Student Policies Violating First Amendment - The 74 - June 20th, 2024 [June 20th, 2024]
- Do Anti-CRT Laws Violate the First Amendment? - Vanderbilt Law - June 20th, 2024 [June 20th, 2024]
- Book Review: The Indispensable Right, by Jonathan Turley - The New York Times - June 20th, 2024 [June 20th, 2024]
- Perspectives: Tale of two Cohens: promissory and profane - Minnesota Lawyer - June 20th, 2024 [June 20th, 2024]
- SPJ urges Mississippi Supreme Court to overturn lower court order that threatens journalists' First Amendment rights - Society of Professional... - June 20th, 2024 [June 20th, 2024]
- Anti-Semitism and the First Amendment | | khq.com - KHQ Right Now - June 20th, 2024 [June 20th, 2024]
- Personal Reflections: First Amendment and Religious Freedom | Opinion and Editorials | Lewiston Tribune | lmtribune ... - Lewiston Morning Tribune - June 20th, 2024 [June 20th, 2024]
- Fort Worth City Reinforces First Amendment Rights with True Texas Project Event Reinstatement at Botanic Garden - Hoodline - June 20th, 2024 [June 20th, 2024]
- Supreme Court Clears Way for N.R.A. to Pursue First Amendment Challenge - The New York Times - May 31st, 2024 [May 31st, 2024]
- SCOTUS unanimously backs NRA on First Amendment ruling - JURIST - May 31st, 2024 [May 31st, 2024]
- Unanimous First Amendment Victory for the NRA (Represented by the ACLU) - Reason - May 31st, 2024 [May 31st, 2024]
- Supreme Court Says Government Bullying Can Violate the First Amendment - Goldwater Institute - May 31st, 2024 [May 31st, 2024]
- SCOTUS Unanimously Sides With NRA in First Amendment Case - The Reload - May 31st, 2024 [May 31st, 2024]
- Supreme Court unanimously sides with NRA in First Amendment dispute with New York official - Washington Times - May 31st, 2024 [May 31st, 2024]
- Why Justice Sotomayor just handed the NRA a big Supreme Court victory - Vox.com - May 31st, 2024 [May 31st, 2024]
- John Stockton Loses Case Over Regulation of COVID Speech - Sportico - May 31st, 2024 [May 31st, 2024]
- More on the New York Trump Case and the First Amendment - Reason - May 5th, 2024 [May 5th, 2024]
- Campus encampment bans rarely violate the First Amendment. Here's why. - Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression - May 5th, 2024 [May 5th, 2024]
- Trump's Trial and the First Amendment - Reason - May 5th, 2024 [May 5th, 2024]
- Are gag orders constitutional? SCOTUS says it depends - VERIFYThis.com - May 5th, 2024 [May 5th, 2024]
- Donald Trump Has a First Amendment Right to Pay Hush Money to Support his Electoral Ambitions - Reason - May 5th, 2024 [May 5th, 2024]