Berschauer threat of legal action not carried through – Portland Tribune
Save Yamhill County organizers say commissioner's goal was to misdirect voters days before ballots were mailed
Less than a week before ballots began arriving in mailboxes across the county, attorneys for Commissioner Lindsay Berschauer demanded that the organization seeking her recall, Save Yamhill County, retract statements made on the petitions circulated over the past several months. The embattled commissioner's attorneys threatened legal action if the statements were not retracted.
"On the recall petition filed Nov. 18 during subsequent circulation of that petition, and likely in other subsequent communications, you have made numerous allegations about Commissioner Berschauer without providing factual support," attorney Steve Elzinga of the Portland firm Sherman Sherman Johnnie & Hoyt wrote on Feb. 25.
It appears the threat of legal action was without teeth.
"Despite her promise in her March 4 Facebook Live video to bring a lawsuit against Save Yamhill County, chief petitioner Phil Fovre and myself, we have heard nothing further from either the commissioner or her attorney, and don't expect that she will follow through with her threat," Lynette Shaw, the co-petitioner on the recall effort, said in an email. Berschauer defeated Shaw in a 2020 race for Position 2 on the commission.
Shaw dismissed the threatened lawsuit as a political ploy to distract voters from the real issue: Berschauer's fitness for office.
"Instead of answering the concerns of her constituents or talking with the community about what troubled them enough to call for her resignation, the commissioner has, from the very first day the recall was filed, followed a strategy of casting doubt on the recall effort with lies and mischaracterizations and, even more disturbing, making repeated personal attacks on her constituents who have supported her recall. The threatened lawsuit is just more of the same," Shaw said.
Berschauer countered that her intent in threatening a lawsuit was to maintain the integrity of county governance.
"My purposes in pursuing legal action against this fraudulent recall effort are not only to protect taxpayers from having to pay for these unwarranted and unlawful pursuits in the future (this is costing county taxpayers $80,000), but to also reinforce that recalls should be reserved for egregious and unlawful behavior, not differences of opinion over public policy decisions," she said in an email. "I have also incurred considerable costs in having to defend myself against this unlawful recall attempt, therefore economic damages would be pursued as well."
Berschauer further argued that the wording on the petition, circulated during the first of the year and garnering more than 7,000 signatures, differed significantly from the petition circulated in November that was disqualified by the county on a technical error. She said her team had concerns about the statement on the first petition, but its disqualification rendered it unnecessary to retain an attorney to question its legality.
"When Mr. Fovre filed the second petition, we were shocked to see that his statement changed considerably," Berschauer said. "The language and accusations were markedly different from 'round one.'"
At that point Berschauer hired an attorney, who suggested that the statements were fundamentally false and could be proven as such.
"The statute says that the individual must have known at the time that their statements were false," said Berschauer, who owned and operated a political consulting firm prior to being elected. "We believe, given that Mr. Fovre had spent months on this effort, that he and Save Yamhill County knew the statements provided in the recall petition were false."
Shaw explained that the wording on the petition, technically called a "recall statement," was approved by County Clerk Brian Van Bergen, which allowed SYC to begin circulating the petition and collect signatures.
"That approval happened for this recall on Nov. 18," Shaw said. "The petition is a public document and has been accessible to Commissioner Berschauer and her legal counsel since Nov. 18. We never heard anything from the commissioner or her counsel about the wording on our statement until well after our signatures were submitted for certification and ballots were soon to be delivered to voters."
Shaw said Berschauer's goal was misdirection, plain and simple.
"We believe the commissioner's threat of a lawsuit was intended to harass and intimidate our recall effort," Shaw said. "It's a political strategy she has used with us before: threaten and claim violations of some sort, but never follow through because the damage is done with the threat and misleading messaging that she stands up around it. It's a hardball political tactic, and it has no place here in local politics, especially when used against members of the community."
Shaw responded to Berschauer's threat of legal action with a promise: "If a suit is ever filed, it will most definitely be met with an anti-SLAPP motion. It's highly doubtful she'll take it further, because she understands that this is a classic SLAPP suit, denying us our First Amendment rights, and it's not winnable."
SLAPP is an acronym for Strategic Lawsuit Against Public Participation and is intended to silence critics by forcing them to mount a costly legal defense. Anti-SLAPP laws were adopted in Oregon and many other states more than a decade ago to protect individuals and organizations from litigation while protecting their First Amendment rights.
Berschauer argued that SYC's actions violated state statute that make it illegal to complete and file a recall petition with reckless disregard and that it contains false statement of material fact related to the public officer subject to the recall.
"We also believe that their actions won't qualify for anti-SLAPP protections given the statute's clear language."
You count on us to stay informed and we depend on you to fund our efforts.Quality local journalism takes time and money. Please support us to protect the future of community journalism.
Read the original post:
Berschauer threat of legal action not carried through - Portland Tribune
- Kansas Statehouse clownery has torn First Amendment to shreds. Who will tape it back together? - Kansas Reflector - March 18th, 2025 [March 18th, 2025]
- Is Mahmoud Khalil protected by the First Amendment? - CNN - March 18th, 2025 [March 18th, 2025]
- D.C. Media's Gridiron Dinner Features A Toast To The First Amendment --- And Not To The President - Deadline - March 18th, 2025 [March 18th, 2025]
- Mayors Threat to Close Miami Cinema Over No Other Land Screening Condemned by Film Groups as First Amendment Violation - Yahoo - March 18th, 2025 [March 18th, 2025]
- TSA Screeners' Union Sues the Trump Administration for Violating Its First Amendment Rights - Reason - March 18th, 2025 [March 18th, 2025]
- Kevin McCabe: Why defending the First Amendment means protecting the Second - Must Read Alaska - March 18th, 2025 [March 18th, 2025]
- Murder the Truth explores the campaign against the First Amendment - The Washington Post - March 18th, 2025 [March 18th, 2025]
- The Trump-Musk Administration Is Running Out of Ways to Ignore the First Amendment - Balls & Strikes - March 18th, 2025 [March 18th, 2025]
- From Gods to Google: DU Law Professor Sounds Alarm Over First Amendment and Technology Regulation - University of Denver Newsroom - March 18th, 2025 [March 18th, 2025]
- Intimidating abridgments and political stunts First Amendment News 461 - Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression - March 18th, 2025 [March 18th, 2025]
- Opinion | The Khalil case is a threat to First Amendment rights - The Washington Post - March 18th, 2025 [March 18th, 2025]
- Fallout from campus protests sparks debate on limits of the First Amendment - Spectrum News - March 18th, 2025 [March 18th, 2025]
- Troy Carico: Stabbing the First Amendment in the back in Alabama | - 1819 News - March 18th, 2025 [March 18th, 2025]
- Donald Trump Is Tearing Up The First Amendment - HuffPost - March 18th, 2025 [March 18th, 2025]
- Sorry Mahmoud Khalil, Aliens Do Not Have the Same First Amendment Rights as American Citizens - Immigration Blog - March 18th, 2025 [March 18th, 2025]
- BREAKING: Bill Nye to headline annual Loyolan First Amendment Week - Los Angeles Loyolan - March 18th, 2025 [March 18th, 2025]
- Spokane and Bonner county sheriff's offices can no longer hide or delete critical Facebook comments after First Amendment concerns, judges rule - The... - March 18th, 2025 [March 18th, 2025]
- Paula Rigano: Last time I checked, the First Amendment still stood - GazetteNET - March 18th, 2025 [March 18th, 2025]
- Trump is using antisemitism as a pretext for a war on the first amendment | Judith Levine - The Guardian - March 18th, 2025 [March 18th, 2025]
- Professor Can Continue with First Amendment Claim Over Denial of Raise for Including Expurgated Slurs on Exam - Reason - March 18th, 2025 [March 18th, 2025]
- Free Mahmoud Khalil and protect students exercising their First Amendment rights! - MoveOn's petitions - March 18th, 2025 [March 18th, 2025]
- Guy Ciarrocchi: The lesson from Covid the experts hate our First Amendment - Broad + Liberty - March 18th, 2025 [March 18th, 2025]
- Trump Administration Faces Growing Backlash Over First Amendment Concerns and Threats to Free Speech - Arise News - March 18th, 2025 [March 18th, 2025]
- The Lobby, Mahmoud Khalil & the First Amendment - Consortium News - March 18th, 2025 [March 18th, 2025]
- Expressive Discrimination: Universities' First Amendment Right to Affirmative Action Part 2 - Reason - March 3rd, 2025 [March 3rd, 2025]
- Inside Israel's Plan To Resume the War and 'Eradicate Hamas.' Plus, Trump's Press Pool Takeover Is Not an Assault on the First Amendment. - Washington... - March 3rd, 2025 [March 3rd, 2025]
- Expressive Discrimination: Universities' First Amendment Right to Affirmative Action - Reason - March 3rd, 2025 [March 3rd, 2025]
- OPINION: Attacking the First Amendment and America's free press - Midland Daily News - March 3rd, 2025 [March 3rd, 2025]
- Press pool takeover drowns First Amendment - Freedom of the Press Foundation - March 3rd, 2025 [March 3rd, 2025]
- First Amendment Victory! Wyoming Airport Agrees to Settlement After Rejecting PETA Ad - PETA - March 3rd, 2025 [March 3rd, 2025]
- Our View: Theres nothing murky about the First Amendment - Palestine Herald Press - March 3rd, 2025 [March 3rd, 2025]
- Ohio Universitys complicated history with the First Amendment and student expression - The New Political - March 3rd, 2025 [March 3rd, 2025]
- A free press makes a country free The First Amendment protects the liberty of all - Hawaii Tribune-Herald - March 3rd, 2025 [March 3rd, 2025]
- Whats the First Amendment Got to Do With It? The White Houses Associated Press Ban - Law.com - March 3rd, 2025 [March 3rd, 2025]
- Opinion | The First Amendment Isnt on Trumps Side - The Wall Street Journal - March 3rd, 2025 [March 3rd, 2025]
- Trump Tries To Carve Out a First Amendment Exception for 'Fake News' - Reason - March 3rd, 2025 [March 3rd, 2025]
- MTHS receives its 15th First Amendment Press Freedom Award - MLT News - March 3rd, 2025 [March 3rd, 2025]
- The White House takeover of the press pool is a brazen attack on the First Amendment - MSNBC - March 3rd, 2025 [March 3rd, 2025]
- Donald Trump violated the First Amendment when he barred The Associated Press from the White House - The Observer - March 3rd, 2025 [March 3rd, 2025]
- D.C.'s U.S. Attorney Is a Menace to the First Amendment - Reason - March 3rd, 2025 [March 3rd, 2025]
- Ominous Move to Strip Americans of First Amendment Rights - DCReport - March 3rd, 2025 [March 3rd, 2025]
- Editorial New York Daily News: A free press makes a country free The First Amendment protects the liberty of all - The Daily News Online - March 3rd, 2025 [March 3rd, 2025]
- Narrow Applicability Is Not the Same As Narrow Tailoring: Applying the First Amendment in First Choice Womens Resource Centers v. Platkin - The... - February 27th, 2025 [February 27th, 2025]
- More to Every Story: First Amendment rights and public events - KREM.com - February 27th, 2025 [February 27th, 2025]
- Trumps lawsuit barred by the First Amendment, pollsters team argues - The Washington Post - February 27th, 2025 [February 27th, 2025]
- Judge orders local newspaper to remove editorial; owner says this violates First Amendment rights - WLBT - February 27th, 2025 [February 27th, 2025]
- AP sues Trump officials over Oval Office ban, citing First Amendment - Axios - February 27th, 2025 [February 27th, 2025]
- A free press makes a country free: The First Amendment protects the liberty of all - New York Daily News - February 27th, 2025 [February 27th, 2025]
- Ilya Shapiro is back . . . with a new book First Amendment News 458 - Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression - February 20th, 2025 [February 20th, 2025]
- People exercising their First Amendment rights aren't 'wreckers' | Letters - South Bend Tribune - February 20th, 2025 [February 20th, 2025]
- Trump bans AP and words he doesn't like. 'Free speech' was never about First Amendment. | Opinion - USA TODAY - February 20th, 2025 [February 20th, 2025]
- Silenced: The Joby Weeks Case and the Erosion of First Amendment Rights - NewsBreak - February 20th, 2025 [February 20th, 2025]
- White House barring AP from press events violates the First Amendment - Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression - February 16th, 2025 [February 16th, 2025]
- A New Hampshire town and a bakery owner are headed for trial in a First Amendment dispute - The Associated Press - February 16th, 2025 [February 16th, 2025]
- New Hampshire town and bakery take their 'First Amendment' legal battle over colossal pastry mural to trial - New York Post - February 16th, 2025 [February 16th, 2025]
- A.P. Accuses White House of Violating First Amendment - The New York Times - February 16th, 2025 [February 16th, 2025]
- First Amendment law legend: Fight back - Freedom of the Press Foundation - February 16th, 2025 [February 16th, 2025]
- First Amendment in Trump's second term: 'We're going to be busy,' free speech group says - Tallahassee Democrat - February 16th, 2025 [February 16th, 2025]
- Expression Over Radio Waves Is Not Exempt from the First Amendment - The Federalist Society - February 16th, 2025 [February 16th, 2025]
- Iowa lawmakers try again to pass anti-SLAPP bill expediting First Amendment cases - Iowa Capital Dispatch - February 16th, 2025 [February 16th, 2025]
- Three Senators Blast FCC for 'Weaponizing its Authority,' Cite First Amendment Concerns - Adweek - February 16th, 2025 [February 16th, 2025]
- The AP says Trump blocking its reporter from Oval Office over not using Gulf of America "violates the First Amendment" - CBS News - February 16th, 2025 [February 16th, 2025]
- Wave of state-level AI bills raise First Amendment problems - Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression - February 16th, 2025 [February 16th, 2025]
- Legendary First Amendment lawyer begs press to fight Trumps attacks - Freedom of the Press Foundation - February 16th, 2025 [February 16th, 2025]
- Timothy Zicks Executive Watch: Introduction First Amendment News 457 - Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression - February 16th, 2025 [February 16th, 2025]
- Trump accused of violating First Amendment after AP reporter barred from event over Gulf of America renaming - The Independent - February 16th, 2025 [February 16th, 2025]
- Editorial: Trump goes to war on the First Amendment - Detroit News - February 16th, 2025 [February 16th, 2025]
- Voices are meant to be heard: the First Amendment and you - Northern Iowan - February 16th, 2025 [February 16th, 2025]
- CBS News Lesley Stahl to be honored at First Amendment Awards - Editor And Publisher Magazine - February 16th, 2025 [February 16th, 2025]
- The AP says Trump blocking its reporter from Oval Office over not using Gulf of America violates the First Amendment - KWTX - February 16th, 2025 [February 16th, 2025]
- Trump takes another dump on the First Amendment - Daily Kos - February 16th, 2025 [February 16th, 2025]
- Spreading the news and defending the First Amendment since August 1787 - Lexington Herald Leader - February 16th, 2025 [February 16th, 2025]
- Publishing Pro-Hamas Propaganda Is Protected by First Amendment - Reason - February 7th, 2025 [February 7th, 2025]
- "Title VI Must Be Applied Consistent with First Amendment Principles" - Reason - February 7th, 2025 [February 7th, 2025]
- Coming soon: Executive Watch Tracking the Trump Administrations free speech record First Amendment News 456 - Foundation for Individual Rights and... - February 7th, 2025 [February 7th, 2025]
- Q&A: Professor emphasizes the impact the TikTok ban could have on the First Amendment - Elon News Network - February 7th, 2025 [February 7th, 2025]
- First Amendment Audit of ELPD Draws Widespread Attention Online - East Lansing Info - February 7th, 2025 [February 7th, 2025]
- Groups demand U.S. attorney for D.C. respect First Amendment - Freedom of the Press Foundation - February 7th, 2025 [February 7th, 2025]
- Maryland age assurance lawsuit shows NetChoice digging in on First Amendment - Biometric Update - February 7th, 2025 [February 7th, 2025]
- What does the first amendment protect during public comment? - Spectrum News 1 - February 7th, 2025 [February 7th, 2025]