FBI Thought Threats to Capitol Before 1/6 Were ‘First Amendment-Protected’ – Newsweek
A major Senate report regarding the January 6 attack on the Capitol has found that neither the FBI nor the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) gave sufficient warning of any potential violence that day, having dismissed online threats as "First Amendment-protected speech."
The bipartisan report revealed there had been a number of failures from law enforcement and government agencies in the run-up to the insurrection, which saw hundreds of Donald Trump supporters and far-right extremists storm the building in Washington, D.C. Five people died during the violence.
One of the main criticisms in the report was that neither the FBI nor the DHS deemed posts on social media and message board sites calling for violence at the Capitol as credible.
Representatives from both agencies testified that they believed much of the rhetoric expressed online prior to January 6 was "First Amendment-protected speech" of limited credibility.
Neither the DHS Office of Intelligence and Analysis (I&A) nor the FBI issued intelligence specific to January 6, despite being aware of the threat of extremist violence emanating from social media and online posts.
Late on January 5, the FBI's Norfolk Field Office did circulate a Situational Information Report that warned people were traveling to Washington, D.C. for "war" at the Capitol the following day, but did not provide any formal intelligence assessment.
"When asked how I&A did not identify any of the social media posts calling for attacking the Capitol prior to January 6, one DHS I&A official cautioned that social media is 'nuanced' and that it can be difficult to distinguish between mere rhetoric and overt threats," the report states.
During previous testimony, Jill Sanborn, then-assistant director of the FBI's Counterterrorism Division, said she did not believe that the FBI was aware of specific conversations on social media calling for violence in the lead-up to January 6.
"Under our authorities, because being mindful of the First Amendment and our dual-headed mission to uphold the Constitution, we cannot collect First Amendment-protected activities without sort of the next step, which is the intent," Sanborn said.
The report is also critical of the United States Capitol Police department (USCP) for not fully conveying the potential scope of the violence being planned that day, despite its Intelligence and Interagency Coordination Division (IICD) being aware of calls for violence at the Capitol on January 6.
These threats included a "plot to breach the Capitol, the online sharing of maps of the Capitol Complex's tunnel systems, and other specific threats of violence," the report states.
"Yet, IICD did not convey the full scope of known information to USCP leadership, rank-and-file officers, or law enforcement partners."
Officers on the day were also let down by poor management and planning, including USCP's Incident Command System breaking during the attack, leaving frontline officers "without key information or instructions as events unfolded."
Some senior officers were also found engaging and fighting with those trying to storm the Capitol instead of giving orders.
"USCP leadership never took control of the radio system to communicate orders to frontline officers," the report found.
The report was initiated by Senators Gary Peters (D-MI) and Rob Portman (R-OH), Chairman and Ranking Member of the Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee, and Amy Klobuchar (D-MN) and Roy Blunt (R-MO), Chairwoman and Ranking Member of the Committee on Rules and Administration.
"The events of January 6 were horrific, and our bipartisan investigation identified many unacceptable, widespread breakdowns in security preparations and emergency response related to this attack," Peters said in a statement.
"Our report offers critical recommendations to address these failures and strengthen security for the Capitol to prevent an attack of this nature from ever happening again."
See the article here:
FBI Thought Threats to Capitol Before 1/6 Were 'First Amendment-Protected' - Newsweek
- Matt Gaetz says the First Amendment was "harmed gravely" by January 6 prosecutions - Media Matters for America - January 26th, 2025 [January 26th, 2025]
- New FCC Chair Revives Complaints About ABC, CBS And NBC Content That His Predecessor Rejected As "At Odds With The First Amendment" -... - January 26th, 2025 [January 26th, 2025]
- Trumps stated promise: Stop all government censorship and his free speech Executive Order First Amendment News 454 - Foundation for Individual Rights... - January 26th, 2025 [January 26th, 2025]
- We Must Protect The First Amendment At All Costs vs. No Thanks, Ill Just Take My Freedoms For Granted Until They Disappear - The Onion - January 26th, 2025 [January 26th, 2025]
- TikTok and the First Amendment Robert G. Natelson - Law & Liberty - January 26th, 2025 [January 26th, 2025]
- De Pere man sued city of Green Bay for violating his First Amendment rights. The city settled. - Green Bay Press Gazette - January 26th, 2025 [January 26th, 2025]
- UChicago Student Sues University, Alleging First Amendment and Tenant Rights Violations - The Chicago Maroon - January 26th, 2025 [January 26th, 2025]
- Dr. Rand Paul Introduces Free Speech Protection Act to Safeguard Americans First Amendment Rights Against Government Censorship - Senator Rand Paul - January 26th, 2025 [January 26th, 2025]
- Capistrano School District Accused of Trampling First Amendment Rights of Student - California Globe - January 26th, 2025 [January 26th, 2025]
- Jerry Zahorchak | Keeping the First Amendment on Facebook | Columns | tribdem.com - TribDem.com - January 26th, 2025 [January 26th, 2025]
- 2 blockbuster cases about the First Amendment and online speech - The Hill - January 26th, 2025 [January 26th, 2025]
- The First Amendment is First for a Reason - The Wilson Quarterly - January 26th, 2025 [January 26th, 2025]
- Takeaways from the Supreme Courts TikTok decision and what it may mean for the First Amendment - CNN - January 19th, 2025 [January 19th, 2025]
- Oral Argument in TikTok v. Garland: Does the First Amendment Apply, and How? - The Federalist Society - January 19th, 2025 [January 19th, 2025]
- TikTok, HamHom, and the First Amendment - Reason - January 19th, 2025 [January 19th, 2025]
- Supreme Court weighs First Amendment rights and porn in Texas case - NPR - January 19th, 2025 [January 19th, 2025]
- "Strong stand for the First Amendment": TikTok announces U.S. return after Trump promise to stay ban - Salon - January 19th, 2025 [January 19th, 2025]
- FCCs Rosenworcel Takes Parting Swipe at Incoming Trump Administration Over First Amendment - TV Technology - January 19th, 2025 [January 19th, 2025]
- Upholding TikTok ban, Supreme Court attacks First Amendment ahead of Trump inauguration - WSWS - January 19th, 2025 [January 19th, 2025]
- Rand Paul Reacts to TikTok Ruling: 'Violation of the First Amendment' - Newsweek - January 19th, 2025 [January 19th, 2025]
- Supreme Court Denies TikTok First Amendment Pass, Effectively Shuttering the Social Media Platform in the U.S. on Jan. 19 Unless Sold to Third Party -... - January 19th, 2025 [January 19th, 2025]
- "Satan loves the First Amendment" banner lawsuit allowed to proceed against Broward schools - CBS News - January 6th, 2025 [January 6th, 2025]
- Claim Against School Board That Refused to Display "Satan Loves the First Amendment" Banner Can Go Forward - Reason - January 6th, 2025 [January 6th, 2025]
- First Amendment gives way to national security: Countdown on for TikTok - Virginia Mercury - January 6th, 2025 [January 6th, 2025]
- Settlement puts Disneys business interests above First Amendment - Freedom of the Press Foundation - January 6th, 2025 [January 6th, 2025]
- Federal Judge Temporarily Blocks Protect Tennessee Minors Act Over First Amendment Concerns - SValleyNow.com | Local News for Marion County and the... - January 6th, 2025 [January 6th, 2025]
- Sullivan and the Central Meaning of the First Amendment Lee Levine & Matthew Schafer - Law & Liberty - January 1st, 2025 [January 1st, 2025]
- Tennessee age verification law blocked from taking effect due to First Amendment concerns - WZTV - January 1st, 2025 [January 1st, 2025]
- FIRE to SCOTUS: TikTok ban violates Americans' First Amendment rights - Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression - January 1st, 2025 [January 1st, 2025]
- Ald. Jim Gardiner Agrees to Pay $157K to Settle Lawsuit Claiming He Violated First Amendment by Blocking Critics From Official Facebook Page - WTTW... - January 1st, 2025 [January 1st, 2025]
- First Amendment the first casualty in Oklahoma school chiefs weird war on woke | Opinion - Wichita Eagle - January 1st, 2025 [January 1st, 2025]
- Donald Trump Asks Supreme Court to Delay TikTok Ban Over First Amendment Concerns - TheWrap - January 1st, 2025 [January 1st, 2025]
- How Washington State Stifles the First Amendment for the Incarcerated - Solitary Watch - December 22nd, 2024 [December 22nd, 2024]
- Opinion | Theres Still Time for the Senate to Support the First Amendment - The New York Times - December 22nd, 2024 [December 22nd, 2024]
- First Amendment Censorship Claims Against Stanford Internet Observatory Can Go Forward to Discovery as to Jurisdiction and Standing - Reason - December 22nd, 2024 [December 22nd, 2024]
- S. Ct. Will Hear First Amendment Challenge to TikTok Divestment on Jan. 10 - Reason - December 22nd, 2024 [December 22nd, 2024]
- Counterpoint: Reporters shouldnt have more First Amendment rights than the rest of us - Citrus County Chronicle - December 22nd, 2024 [December 22nd, 2024]
- Deal reached in First Amendment -Facebook lawsuit against Ald. Gardiner, as city agrees to pay some costs - Nadig Newspapers - December 22nd, 2024 [December 22nd, 2024]
- Iowa Republicans are afraid of the First Amendment - Bleeding Heartland - December 22nd, 2024 [December 22nd, 2024]
- TikTok Asks Supreme Court to Block Law Banning Its U.S. Operations - The New York Times - December 18th, 2024 [December 18th, 2024]
- Supreme Court agrees to hear TikToks First Amendment challenge to U.S. ban if not sold - Spectrum News NY1 - December 18th, 2024 [December 18th, 2024]
- Chris Hayes Says Trumps Media Lawsuits Are Meant to Open the Floodgates to Overturn Key First Amendment Rights | Video - Yahoo! Voices - December 18th, 2024 [December 18th, 2024]
- Media on the run: A sign of things to come in Trump times? First Amendment News 451 - Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression - December 18th, 2024 [December 18th, 2024]
- KERC Approves First Amendment to Multi-Year Transmission, Distribution, and Retail Supply Tariff Regulations 2024 - SolarQuarter - December 18th, 2024 [December 18th, 2024]
- Masked Protests and First Amendment Rights The Chickenman Case in Smyrna - Wgnsradio - December 18th, 2024 [December 18th, 2024]
- First Amendment attorneys say Ohio bill aimed at curbing antisemitism may infringe on rights - 10TV - December 18th, 2024 [December 18th, 2024]
- First Amendment warning: 100% chance of Ryan Walters tweeting - NonDoc - December 18th, 2024 [December 18th, 2024]
- Chris Hayes Says Trump's Media Lawsuits Are Meant to 'Open the Floodgates' to Overturn Key First Amendment Rights | Video - TheWrap - December 18th, 2024 [December 18th, 2024]
- SJC expands First Amendment protection to true threats over the Internet, by text, and in person - The Boston Globe - December 14th, 2024 [December 14th, 2024]
- OPINION: The First Amendment is the Biggest Story of the 2024 Presidential Election - Nevada Globe - December 14th, 2024 [December 14th, 2024]
- First Amendment: Anathema or weapon? - Workers World - December 14th, 2024 [December 14th, 2024]
- Justices Will Hear First Amendment Challenge to Denial of Tax Exemption for Catholic Charities - Law.com - December 14th, 2024 [December 14th, 2024]
- The Press and The People Must Not Willingly Surrender First Amendment Rights to Trump - Daily Kos - December 14th, 2024 [December 14th, 2024]
- La. TikTok creator says potential app ban infringes on First Amendment right - KPLC - December 14th, 2024 [December 14th, 2024]
- Opinion | The TikTok Ruling Is a Blow for the First Amendment and Free Speech - The New York Times - December 10th, 2024 [December 10th, 2024]
- TikTok failed to save itself with the First Amendment - The Verge - December 10th, 2024 [December 10th, 2024]
- Newsoms War on Political Speech: ADF Defends Rumble in the First Amendment Case - California Family Council - December 10th, 2024 [December 10th, 2024]
- Opinion | The TikTok Sale and the First Amendment - The Wall Street Journal - December 8th, 2024 [December 8th, 2024]
- Secret court hearing threatens the First Amendment and more - The Hill - December 8th, 2024 [December 8th, 2024]
- President Trump lacks standing: CBS rubbishes lawsuit over Kamala Harris 60 Minutes interview as procedurally baseless and prohibited by the First... - December 8th, 2024 [December 8th, 2024]
- Perspective: Colorado vs. the First Amendment - Colorado Springs Gazette - December 8th, 2024 [December 8th, 2024]
- Annenberg Classroom Film on First Amendment Wins Anthem Award - The Annenberg Public Policy Center of the University of Pennsylvania - December 8th, 2024 [December 8th, 2024]
- Trumps calls to investigate pollster put First Amendment at risk - Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression - December 8th, 2024 [December 8th, 2024]
- First Amendment Likely Protects Referring Patients for Out-of-State Abortions - Reason - December 8th, 2024 [December 8th, 2024]
- Trumps FBI director pick Kash Patel: A clear and present danger to freedom of the press First Amendment News 449 - Foundation for Individual Rights... - December 8th, 2024 [December 8th, 2024]
- Federal judge tosses First Amendment retaliation claim in Gibbs lawsuit - News From The States - December 8th, 2024 [December 8th, 2024]
- Litigation: First Amendment rights violated by Cabarrus County - The Courier=Times - November 26th, 2024 [November 26th, 2024]
- Lee C. Bollinger on the First Amendment, Free Speech, Affirmative Action, and More - Columbia University - November 26th, 2024 [November 26th, 2024]
- 'Free Speech Was Given to Us by God': Why the First Amendment Is in Danger Like Never Before - CBN.com - November 26th, 2024 [November 26th, 2024]
- The Impact of The First Amendment: Essays on the Imperative of Intellectual Freedom - New Ideal - November 26th, 2024 [November 26th, 2024]
- Journal of Free Speech Law: "The Press Clause: The Forgotten First Amendment," - Reason - November 26th, 2024 [November 26th, 2024]
- Kansas nurse Elaine Gebhardt claims First Amendment protection in state board probe of her social media posts - The Sentinel - November 26th, 2024 [November 26th, 2024]
- Thomas pushed to overrule Kagans order in COVID-related First Amendment case where RFK Jr. serves as co-counsel - Law & Crime - November 26th, 2024 [November 26th, 2024]
- Counterpoint: Reporters shouldnt have more First Amendment rights than the rest of us - TribLIVE - November 26th, 2024 [November 26th, 2024]
- Trump Resumes His Endless War Against the First Amendment - The New Republic - November 26th, 2024 [November 26th, 2024]
- Anti-porn lawyers ready to profit from a Kansas age-gating law that may violate the First Amendment - Kansas City Pitch - November 26th, 2024 [November 26th, 2024]
- Its the First Amendment, stupid. Judge tells Florida to stop threatening TV stations - The Daily News Online - October 21st, 2024 [October 21st, 2024]
- Californias deepfake ban cant fool the deep protections of the First Amendment - The Hill - October 14th, 2024 [October 14th, 2024]
- Florida health department defies First Amendment, threatens to prosecute TV stations for airing abortion rights ad - Foundation for Individual Rights... - October 14th, 2024 [October 14th, 2024]
- Hands Off The ConstitutionNever Mess With The First Amendment - Forbes - October 14th, 2024 [October 14th, 2024]