In Call Before Jan. 6 Riot, a Plea to Descend on the Capitol – The New York Times
One week before an angry mob stormed the Capitol, a communications expert named Jason Sullivan, a onetime aide to Roger J. Stone Jr., joined a conference call with a group of President Donald J. Trumps supporters and made an urgent plea.
After assuring his listeners that the 2020 election had been stolen, Mr. Sullivan told them that they had to go to Washington on Jan. 6, 2021 the day that Congress was to meet to finalize the electoral count and descend on the Capitol, according to a recording of the call obtained by The New York Times.
While Mr. Sullivan claimed that he was not inciting violence or any kind of riots, he urged those on the call to make their presence felt at the Capitol in a way that would intimidate members of Congress, telling the group that they had to ensure that lawmakers inside the building understand that people are breathing down their necks.
He also pledged that Mr. Trump was going to take action on his own; the president, he said, was going to impose a form of martial law on Jan. 6 and would not be leaving office.
Biden will never be in that White House, Mr. Sullivan declared. Thats my promise to each and every one of you.
The recording of the call, which took place on Dec. 30, 2020, emerged as the Justice Department has expanded its criminal investigation of the Capitol attack. It offers a glimpse of the planning that went on in the run-up to the storming of the Capitol and the mind-set of some of those who zeroed in on Jan. 6 as a kind of last stand for keeping Mr. Trump in office.
It also reflects the complexities that federal prosecutors are likely to face as they begin the task of figuring out how much or even whether people involved in the political rallies that preceded the assault can be held accountable for the violence that erupted.
After more than a year of focusing exclusively on rioters who took part in the storming of the Capitol, prosecutors have widened their gaze in recent weeks and have started to question whether those involved in encouraging protests like the one that Mr. Sullivan was describing can be held culpable for disrupting the work of Congress.
Mr. Sullivans remarks during the call appeared to be an effort to motivate a group of people aggrieved by the election to take direct action against members of Congress on Jan. 6, presaging what Mr. Trump himself would say in a speech that day. While it remains unclear whether anyone on Mr. Sullivans call went on to join the mob that breached the Capitol, he seemed to be exhorting his listeners to apply unusual pressure on lawmakers just as they were overseeing the final count of Electoral College votes.
In a statement provided by his lawyer, Mr. Sullivan played down the nature of the call, saying he had merely shared some encouragement with what he described as people who all felt their votes had been disenfranchised in the 2020 elections. Mr. Sullivan said he had been asked to participate in the call by a group of anti-vaccine activists or what he called health freedom advocate moms who were hosting a small, permitted event at the Capitol on Jan. 6.
I only promoted peaceful solutions where Americans could raise their voices and be heard as expressed in our First Amendment, Mr. Sullivan said in the statement. I in no way condone the violence of any protesters.
Still, in the recording of the call, Mr. Sullivan can be heard telling his listeners that the lawmakers inside the Capitol need to feel pressure.
If we make the people inside that building sweat and they understand that they may not be able to walk in the streets any longer if they do the wrong thing, then maybe theyll do the right thing, he said. We have to put that pressure there.
As the Justice Department widens its inquiry, federal prosecutors are using a grand jury in Washington to gather information on political organizers, speakers and so-called V.I.P.s connected to a series of pro-Trump rallies after the 2020 election. One prominent planner of those rallies, Ali Alexander, received a subpoena from the grand jury and said last week that he intended to comply with its requests.
In the run-up to Jan. 6, Mr. Alexander publicly discussed a pressure campaign against lawmakers that was meant to stop the final electoral count, saying he was working with Representative Mo Brooks of Alabama and Representatives Andy Biggs and Paul Gosar of Arizona, all Republicans.
We four schemed up of putting maximum pressure on Congress while they were voting, Mr. Alexander said in a since-deleted video on Periscope. The plan, he said, was to change the hearts and the minds of Republicans who were in that body, hearing our loud roar from outside.
It is unclear if the Justice Department is aware of Mr. Sullivans conference call; the department declined to comment. The House committee investigating the events of Jan. 6 was provided with a copy of the recording some months ago by the woman who made it, Staci Burk, a law student and Republican activist from Arizona.
Shortly after the election, Ms. Burk became convinced that phony ballots had been flown in bulk into Phoenix Sky Harbor International Airport. She eventually submitted an anonymous affidavit concerning the ballots in an election fraud case filed in Federal District Court in Phoenix by the pro-Trump lawyer Sidney Powell.
Debating a criminal referral. The Jan. 6 House committee has grown divided over whether to make a criminal referralto the Justice Department of former President Donald J. Trump, even though it has concluded that it has enough evidence to do so. The debate centers on whether a referral would backfire by politically tainting the expanding federal investigation.
A Trump ally agrees to cooperate. Ali Alexander, a prominent organizer of pro-Trump events after the 2020 election, has agreed to cooperatewith the Justice Departments newly expanded investigation of the attack on the Capitol last year.
The effort to disqualify insurrectionists. New lawsuitswere filed against three Arizona officials, including Representatives Paul Gosar and Andy Biggs, to bar them from office under the 14th Amendment. This is part of a larger legal effort to disqualify G.O.P. lawmakers from re-election if they participated in events surrounding the Jan. 6 attack.
Contempt charges. The House voted to recommend criminal contempt of Congress chargesagainst Peter Navarro and Dan Scavino Jr., two close allies of Mr. Trump, after the pair defied subpoenas from the special committee investigating the Jan. 6 attack.
After becoming involved with Ms. Powell, Ms. Burk said she had been approached by several members of a right-wing paramilitary group, the 1st Amendment Praetorian, which was associated with a former legal client of Ms. Powells, Michael T. Flynn, Mr. Trumps first national security adviser.
Ms. Burk said that members of the group then placed her under unwanted surveillance, insisting on moving into her home in what they described as an effort to protect her from people who might want to retaliate against her for coming forward about voter fraud.
It was a member of the 1st Amendment Praetorian, Ms. Burk said, who had joined the conference call that featured Mr. Sullivan. Ms. Burk said she recorded the call, much like she recorded other activities by the 1st Amendment Praetorian, because she felt threatened and unsafe by the groups presence in her home.
At one point during the call, Mr. Sullivan was asked by an unknown questioner whether Mr. Trump intended to impose martial law on Jan. 6. That explosive notion had been raised publicly two weeks earlier by Mr. Flynn during an appearance on the right-wing television network Newsmax.
Mr. Sullivan answered the question by telling the man that he foresaw Mr. Trump putting in place a limited form of martial law on Jan. 6.
I dont see any other way around it, because hes not going to allow an election fraud to take place, Mr. Sullivan said. Its not going to happen.
A social media consultant who calls himself the Wizard of Twitter, Mr. Sullivan worked for a political action committee run by Mr. Stone, a longtime confidant of Mr. Trumps, during the 2016 presidential campaign. According to Reuters, one of the projects he did for Mr. Stone was a strategy document describing how to use Twitter swarms to amplify political messages.
More recently, Mr. Sullivan has taken an active role in promoting the QAnon conspiracy theory, which holds that prominent liberals belong to a cult of Satan-worshipping pedophiles. At a public appearance last year with Ms. Powell and Mr. Flynn, Mr. Sullivan called Hillary Clinton a godawful woman and then made a gesture suggesting she should be hanged.
On the conference call ahead of Jan. 6, Mr. Sullivan told his listeners that he was an expert at making things go viral online, but that it was not enough to simply spread the message that the election had been stolen.
There has to be a multiple-front strategy, and that multiple-front strategy, I do think, is descend on the Capitol, without question, he said. Make those people feel it inside.
Luke Broadwater contributed reporting.
Excerpt from:
In Call Before Jan. 6 Riot, a Plea to Descend on the Capitol - The New York Times
- Takeaways from the Supreme Courts TikTok decision and what it may mean for the First Amendment - CNN - January 19th, 2025 [January 19th, 2025]
- Oral Argument in TikTok v. Garland: Does the First Amendment Apply, and How? - The Federalist Society - January 19th, 2025 [January 19th, 2025]
- TikTok, HamHom, and the First Amendment - Reason - January 19th, 2025 [January 19th, 2025]
- Supreme Court weighs First Amendment rights and porn in Texas case - NPR - January 19th, 2025 [January 19th, 2025]
- "Strong stand for the First Amendment": TikTok announces U.S. return after Trump promise to stay ban - Salon - January 19th, 2025 [January 19th, 2025]
- FCCs Rosenworcel Takes Parting Swipe at Incoming Trump Administration Over First Amendment - TV Technology - January 19th, 2025 [January 19th, 2025]
- Upholding TikTok ban, Supreme Court attacks First Amendment ahead of Trump inauguration - WSWS - January 19th, 2025 [January 19th, 2025]
- Rand Paul Reacts to TikTok Ruling: 'Violation of the First Amendment' - Newsweek - January 19th, 2025 [January 19th, 2025]
- Supreme Court Denies TikTok First Amendment Pass, Effectively Shuttering the Social Media Platform in the U.S. on Jan. 19 Unless Sold to Third Party -... - January 19th, 2025 [January 19th, 2025]
- "Satan loves the First Amendment" banner lawsuit allowed to proceed against Broward schools - CBS News - January 6th, 2025 [January 6th, 2025]
- Claim Against School Board That Refused to Display "Satan Loves the First Amendment" Banner Can Go Forward - Reason - January 6th, 2025 [January 6th, 2025]
- First Amendment gives way to national security: Countdown on for TikTok - Virginia Mercury - January 6th, 2025 [January 6th, 2025]
- Settlement puts Disneys business interests above First Amendment - Freedom of the Press Foundation - January 6th, 2025 [January 6th, 2025]
- Federal Judge Temporarily Blocks Protect Tennessee Minors Act Over First Amendment Concerns - SValleyNow.com | Local News for Marion County and the... - January 6th, 2025 [January 6th, 2025]
- Sullivan and the Central Meaning of the First Amendment Lee Levine & Matthew Schafer - Law & Liberty - January 1st, 2025 [January 1st, 2025]
- Tennessee age verification law blocked from taking effect due to First Amendment concerns - WZTV - January 1st, 2025 [January 1st, 2025]
- FIRE to SCOTUS: TikTok ban violates Americans' First Amendment rights - Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression - January 1st, 2025 [January 1st, 2025]
- Ald. Jim Gardiner Agrees to Pay $157K to Settle Lawsuit Claiming He Violated First Amendment by Blocking Critics From Official Facebook Page - WTTW... - January 1st, 2025 [January 1st, 2025]
- First Amendment the first casualty in Oklahoma school chiefs weird war on woke | Opinion - Wichita Eagle - January 1st, 2025 [January 1st, 2025]
- Donald Trump Asks Supreme Court to Delay TikTok Ban Over First Amendment Concerns - TheWrap - January 1st, 2025 [January 1st, 2025]
- How Washington State Stifles the First Amendment for the Incarcerated - Solitary Watch - December 22nd, 2024 [December 22nd, 2024]
- Opinion | Theres Still Time for the Senate to Support the First Amendment - The New York Times - December 22nd, 2024 [December 22nd, 2024]
- First Amendment Censorship Claims Against Stanford Internet Observatory Can Go Forward to Discovery as to Jurisdiction and Standing - Reason - December 22nd, 2024 [December 22nd, 2024]
- S. Ct. Will Hear First Amendment Challenge to TikTok Divestment on Jan. 10 - Reason - December 22nd, 2024 [December 22nd, 2024]
- Counterpoint: Reporters shouldnt have more First Amendment rights than the rest of us - Citrus County Chronicle - December 22nd, 2024 [December 22nd, 2024]
- Deal reached in First Amendment -Facebook lawsuit against Ald. Gardiner, as city agrees to pay some costs - Nadig Newspapers - December 22nd, 2024 [December 22nd, 2024]
- Iowa Republicans are afraid of the First Amendment - Bleeding Heartland - December 22nd, 2024 [December 22nd, 2024]
- TikTok Asks Supreme Court to Block Law Banning Its U.S. Operations - The New York Times - December 18th, 2024 [December 18th, 2024]
- Supreme Court agrees to hear TikToks First Amendment challenge to U.S. ban if not sold - Spectrum News NY1 - December 18th, 2024 [December 18th, 2024]
- Chris Hayes Says Trumps Media Lawsuits Are Meant to Open the Floodgates to Overturn Key First Amendment Rights | Video - Yahoo! Voices - December 18th, 2024 [December 18th, 2024]
- Media on the run: A sign of things to come in Trump times? First Amendment News 451 - Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression - December 18th, 2024 [December 18th, 2024]
- KERC Approves First Amendment to Multi-Year Transmission, Distribution, and Retail Supply Tariff Regulations 2024 - SolarQuarter - December 18th, 2024 [December 18th, 2024]
- Masked Protests and First Amendment Rights The Chickenman Case in Smyrna - Wgnsradio - December 18th, 2024 [December 18th, 2024]
- First Amendment attorneys say Ohio bill aimed at curbing antisemitism may infringe on rights - 10TV - December 18th, 2024 [December 18th, 2024]
- First Amendment warning: 100% chance of Ryan Walters tweeting - NonDoc - December 18th, 2024 [December 18th, 2024]
- Chris Hayes Says Trump's Media Lawsuits Are Meant to 'Open the Floodgates' to Overturn Key First Amendment Rights | Video - TheWrap - December 18th, 2024 [December 18th, 2024]
- SJC expands First Amendment protection to true threats over the Internet, by text, and in person - The Boston Globe - December 14th, 2024 [December 14th, 2024]
- OPINION: The First Amendment is the Biggest Story of the 2024 Presidential Election - Nevada Globe - December 14th, 2024 [December 14th, 2024]
- First Amendment: Anathema or weapon? - Workers World - December 14th, 2024 [December 14th, 2024]
- Justices Will Hear First Amendment Challenge to Denial of Tax Exemption for Catholic Charities - Law.com - December 14th, 2024 [December 14th, 2024]
- The Press and The People Must Not Willingly Surrender First Amendment Rights to Trump - Daily Kos - December 14th, 2024 [December 14th, 2024]
- La. TikTok creator says potential app ban infringes on First Amendment right - KPLC - December 14th, 2024 [December 14th, 2024]
- Opinion | The TikTok Ruling Is a Blow for the First Amendment and Free Speech - The New York Times - December 10th, 2024 [December 10th, 2024]
- TikTok failed to save itself with the First Amendment - The Verge - December 10th, 2024 [December 10th, 2024]
- Newsoms War on Political Speech: ADF Defends Rumble in the First Amendment Case - California Family Council - December 10th, 2024 [December 10th, 2024]
- Opinion | The TikTok Sale and the First Amendment - The Wall Street Journal - December 8th, 2024 [December 8th, 2024]
- Secret court hearing threatens the First Amendment and more - The Hill - December 8th, 2024 [December 8th, 2024]
- President Trump lacks standing: CBS rubbishes lawsuit over Kamala Harris 60 Minutes interview as procedurally baseless and prohibited by the First... - December 8th, 2024 [December 8th, 2024]
- Perspective: Colorado vs. the First Amendment - Colorado Springs Gazette - December 8th, 2024 [December 8th, 2024]
- Annenberg Classroom Film on First Amendment Wins Anthem Award - The Annenberg Public Policy Center of the University of Pennsylvania - December 8th, 2024 [December 8th, 2024]
- Trumps calls to investigate pollster put First Amendment at risk - Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression - December 8th, 2024 [December 8th, 2024]
- First Amendment Likely Protects Referring Patients for Out-of-State Abortions - Reason - December 8th, 2024 [December 8th, 2024]
- Trumps FBI director pick Kash Patel: A clear and present danger to freedom of the press First Amendment News 449 - Foundation for Individual Rights... - December 8th, 2024 [December 8th, 2024]
- Federal judge tosses First Amendment retaliation claim in Gibbs lawsuit - News From The States - December 8th, 2024 [December 8th, 2024]
- Litigation: First Amendment rights violated by Cabarrus County - The Courier=Times - November 26th, 2024 [November 26th, 2024]
- Lee C. Bollinger on the First Amendment, Free Speech, Affirmative Action, and More - Columbia University - November 26th, 2024 [November 26th, 2024]
- 'Free Speech Was Given to Us by God': Why the First Amendment Is in Danger Like Never Before - CBN.com - November 26th, 2024 [November 26th, 2024]
- The Impact of The First Amendment: Essays on the Imperative of Intellectual Freedom - New Ideal - November 26th, 2024 [November 26th, 2024]
- Journal of Free Speech Law: "The Press Clause: The Forgotten First Amendment," - Reason - November 26th, 2024 [November 26th, 2024]
- Kansas nurse Elaine Gebhardt claims First Amendment protection in state board probe of her social media posts - The Sentinel - November 26th, 2024 [November 26th, 2024]
- Thomas pushed to overrule Kagans order in COVID-related First Amendment case where RFK Jr. serves as co-counsel - Law & Crime - November 26th, 2024 [November 26th, 2024]
- Counterpoint: Reporters shouldnt have more First Amendment rights than the rest of us - TribLIVE - November 26th, 2024 [November 26th, 2024]
- Trump Resumes His Endless War Against the First Amendment - The New Republic - November 26th, 2024 [November 26th, 2024]
- Anti-porn lawyers ready to profit from a Kansas age-gating law that may violate the First Amendment - Kansas City Pitch - November 26th, 2024 [November 26th, 2024]
- Its the First Amendment, stupid. Judge tells Florida to stop threatening TV stations - The Daily News Online - October 21st, 2024 [October 21st, 2024]
- Californias deepfake ban cant fool the deep protections of the First Amendment - The Hill - October 14th, 2024 [October 14th, 2024]
- Florida health department defies First Amendment, threatens to prosecute TV stations for airing abortion rights ad - Foundation for Individual Rights... - October 14th, 2024 [October 14th, 2024]
- Hands Off The ConstitutionNever Mess With The First Amendment - Forbes - October 14th, 2024 [October 14th, 2024]
- TikTok v. Garland Oral Argument: Did TikTok Admit It Doesnt Have First Amendment Rights? - The Federalist Society - October 14th, 2024 [October 14th, 2024]
- Balancing First Amendment Rights and Youth Protection | Age and Access in the Social Media Era - R Street - October 14th, 2024 [October 14th, 2024]
- Are we not all Americans living by our first amendment? - TAPinto.net - October 14th, 2024 [October 14th, 2024]
- 476. Words, Actions, and Liberty: Tara Smith Decodes the First Amendment - Skeptic Magazine - October 14th, 2024 [October 14th, 2024]
- Council approves a nine-day clean zone for the Super Bowl. A First Amendment lawyer says its excessive. - WWNO - October 14th, 2024 [October 14th, 2024]
- Newsoms anti-satire law tries to kill the joke and the First Amendment - The San Diego Union-Tribune - October 14th, 2024 [October 14th, 2024]
- A Sign Of The Times: Bourne Bylaw Change Off STM Warrant Amid First Amendment Concerns - CapeNews.net - October 14th, 2024 [October 14th, 2024]
- Banned Books Week? Try First Amendment Week instead - Thomas B. Fordham Institute - October 7th, 2024 [October 7th, 2024]
- Stephens City mayor addresses heated exchange with First Amendment auditor - Northern Virginia Daily - October 7th, 2024 [October 7th, 2024]
- What the US Supreme Courts next term holds for the First Amendment - Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press - October 7th, 2024 [October 7th, 2024]
- John Kerry Says First Amendment Is Major Block to Stopping Disinformation, Hopes to Implement Change to That - CBN.com - October 7th, 2024 [October 7th, 2024]
- Can AI regulation survive the First Amendment? - Platformer - October 7th, 2024 [October 7th, 2024]