No, Blocking Traffic Is Not Protected by the First Amendment – Reason
On Saturday, Ronald Reagan Washington National Airport (DCA) posted a warning on X, formerly known as Twitter. "TRAFFIC ALERT," it read. "Expect delays around the airport due to a group in vehicles exercising first amendment rights in roadway. Use caution and expect slow moving vehicles."
The post was a reference to a caravan, with several vehicles flying Palestinian flags, that claimed every lane as they inched along the roadway to the airport, reportedly causing hefty traffic delays.
It is certainly a driver's free speech prerogative to fly their flag of choice. That has nothing to do, however, with obstructing traffic, which is entirely irrelevant to the First Amendment.
One legally confused post from an airport in Virginia doesn't necessarily say much when viewed in a vacuum. But the assertion is indicative of a larger trend, as highway blockades continue to pick up steam across the country. In January, pro-Palestine activists cut off access to the Brooklyn, Manhattan, and Williamsburg Bridges, along with the Holland Tunnel, during rush hour. We've seen similar demonstrations in Seattle, Boston, Chicago, San Francisco, and Philadelphia. That list is not exhaustive. And DCA is not the first airport targeted by protesters: In late December, for example, demonstrators obstructed traffic outside Kennedy International Airport and Los Angeles International Airport during one of the busiest travel weeks of the year.
A settlement in New York essentially seeks to sanction the practice. "Where an FAA [First Amendment Activity] temporarily blocks vehicular or pedestrian traffic or otherwise obstructs public streets or sidewalks, the NYPD [New York Police Department] shall whenever possible accommodate the demonstration," reads a proposed agreement between the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) of New York, the Legal Aid Society, New York Attorney General Letitia James, and the NYPD in response to lawsuits pertaining to the police's handling of various protests in 2020.
The settlement is still up in the air; the police union is trying to fight it. But there is something richly ironic about the state's top law enforcement officer attempting to give the public a green light to break the law. And the ACLU, also involved in the settlement, acknowledges in its own guidance that detaining people by blocking a roadway is not a legal, First Amendmentprotected activity.
"The right to peacefully assemble and protest is sacrosanct and foundational to our democracy," said New York Attorney General James in September after the settlement was unveiled. "Too often peaceful protesters have been met with force that has harmed innocent New Yorkers simply trying to exercise their rights."
James is correct that freedom of expression is crucial and central to the American project. It's also not a force field by which people are shielded from other rules. If I want to get people's attention by, say, driving 120 miles an hour while sporting a Palestinian flag, I cannot tell the officer who pulls me over for reckless driving that I'm simply exercising my free speech rights. The First Amendment does not give carte blanche to violate the law.
Activists may invoke the father of the civil rights movement, Martin Luther King Jr., when defending blockades. That's understandable. It's also misguided. As I wrote in 2022:
Though King did lead a protest from Selma to Montgomery, famously filling the Edmund Pettus Bridge, it was a march. It did not block interstate and highway traffic indefinitely for the sake of ita tactic King was not comfortable with, despite pressure in the 1960s to get on board. "Even though King didn't come out and criticize it in public, in private he thought it was a misguided tactic," said Brandon Terry, assistant professor of African and African American Studies and Social Studies at Harvard University. "The NAACP thought it was ridiculous." King reportedly posited that such a move pushed the boundaries of acceptable demonstrations and would come back to bite the movement politically.
Protesting isn't meant to be convenient. But you might find it difficult to convince people you're the good guy when your blockades are hurting the vulnerable people you often claim to stand for, like this man who may have lost his parole, or this woman who went into labor.
Some folks may disagree. That is indisputably their right, and I'm thankful for that. Also not in dispute: It is not their right to detain people, no matter how righteous they believe their cause to be.
Read the original:
No, Blocking Traffic Is Not Protected by the First Amendment - Reason
- Free speech BACKLASH as even members of Trump's base reject his attack on the First Amendment - MSNBC News - September 21st, 2025 [September 21st, 2025]
- The Observer view: Save the First Amendment - The Observer - September 21st, 2025 [September 21st, 2025]
- How does the First Amendment protect free speech? - Post and Courier - September 21st, 2025 [September 21st, 2025]
- Anna Gomez Calls Kimmel Suspension Most Alarming Attack on the First Amendment in Recent Memory - Vanity Fair - September 21st, 2025 [September 21st, 2025]
- Larson, Crockett, and Jeffries Speak Out Against Trump Administration Report Targeting Them for Exercising First Amendment Rights - Congressman John... - September 21st, 2025 [September 21st, 2025]
- Editorial: Using the First Amendment to protect our rights - Everett Herald - September 21st, 2025 [September 21st, 2025]
- League of Women Voters to host program on Free Speech, First Amendment - Midland Daily News - September 21st, 2025 [September 21st, 2025]
- Republicans railroad the First Amendment, and the Pentagon's war crime worries - Daily Kos - September 21st, 2025 [September 21st, 2025]
- Free Speech on Trial: The Jimmy Kimmel Case and the First Amendment - The Boca Raton Tribune - September 21st, 2025 [September 21st, 2025]
- Trump and his allies are suddenly downplaying the First Amendment - CNN - September 19th, 2025 [September 19th, 2025]
- Jimmy Kimmel, the FCC, and Why Broadcasters Still Have Junior Varsity First Amendment Rights - Cato Institute - September 19th, 2025 [September 19th, 2025]
- Does the First Amendment apply in Jimmy Kimmel's suspension? - CBS News - September 19th, 2025 [September 19th, 2025]
- What to Know About Hate Speech and the First Amendment - The New York Times - September 19th, 2025 [September 19th, 2025]
- Why Jimmy Kimmels First Amendment rights werent violated but ABCs would be protected if it stood up to the FCC and Trump - The Conversation - September 19th, 2025 [September 19th, 2025]
- First Amendment discussion takes Tim Heaphy back to the days writing 2017 report - Cville Right Now - September 19th, 2025 [September 19th, 2025]
- First Amendment advocates increasingly worried after ABC pulled Jimmy Kimmel's show - USA Today - September 19th, 2025 [September 19th, 2025]
- While you may not agree with the content, canceling Jimmy Kimmel Live! out of fear of retaliation from a President who quite literally cant take a... - September 19th, 2025 [September 19th, 2025]
- Is hate speech protected by the First Amendment? What to know after Charlie Kirk's killing - IndyStar - September 19th, 2025 [September 19th, 2025]
- What does Jimmy Kimmels suspension really say about the First Amendment? | ChicagoNOW - FOX 32 Chicago - September 19th, 2025 [September 19th, 2025]
- Press Freedom and the First Amendment - Concord Monitor - September 19th, 2025 [September 19th, 2025]
- Philanthropies and Nonprofits Speak Out Against Attacks on First Amendment - Inside Philanthropy - September 19th, 2025 [September 19th, 2025]
- Daily Herald opinion: The first amendment is under assault. We should all be defending it - Daily Herald - September 19th, 2025 [September 19th, 2025]
- The First Amendment and judicial proceedings: Mary McCord in conversation - The Contrarian - September 19th, 2025 [September 19th, 2025]
- SPJ announces 2025 winners of Distinguished Teaching in Journalism, Galvan Outstanding Graduate in Journalism, Lewis First Amendment Awards - Society... - September 19th, 2025 [September 19th, 2025]
- R.I.P. the First Amendment, Killed by Cowardice and Greed - The Daily Beast - September 19th, 2025 [September 19th, 2025]
- Free speech in the workplace? A First Amendment attorney weighs in - WKYC - September 19th, 2025 [September 19th, 2025]
- Do you think the Trump administration is a threat to First Amendment free speech protections with its recent efforts to stifle dissent? - Wyoming... - September 19th, 2025 [September 19th, 2025]
- First Amendment advocates increasingly worried after ABC pulls Jimmy Kimmel. Here's why - Yahoo - September 19th, 2025 [September 19th, 2025]
- Mass. teachers are being placed on leave for posts on Charlie Kirks death. What are their First Amendment rights? - The Boston Globe - September 19th, 2025 [September 19th, 2025]
- The First Amendment is for we, not just thee - Baptist News Global - September 19th, 2025 [September 19th, 2025]
- Charlie Kirk And The Chill Effect Ices The First Amendment - Colorado Times Recorder - September 19th, 2025 [September 19th, 2025]
- Opinion | Censoring Jimmy Kimmel Is Not The Biggest Threat To The First Amendment - Common Dreams - September 19th, 2025 [September 19th, 2025]
- LAUSD has a social media policy for parents. ACLU says it violates the First Amendment - LAist - September 19th, 2025 [September 19th, 2025]
- What does the First Amendment mean and how does it work? - CBS News - September 19th, 2025 [September 19th, 2025]
- Pam Bondi's hate speech comments exposed a stunning ignorance of the First Amendment - MSNBC News - September 19th, 2025 [September 19th, 2025]
- Jon Stewart Responds to Jimmy Kimmel Live! Being Pulled: 'We Have a Little Thing Called the First Amendment' - People.com - September 19th, 2025 [September 19th, 2025]
- Private unions and the limits of First Amendment claims - Daily Journal - September 19th, 2025 [September 19th, 2025]
- The first amendment is not what it used to be: Nicolle Wallace reacts to Jimmy Kimmels suspension - MSNBC News - September 19th, 2025 [September 19th, 2025]
- ISU legal scholar on the First Amendment: 'Its very misunderstood' - WGLT - September 19th, 2025 [September 19th, 2025]
- Cruz says First Amendment absolutely protects hate speech in wake of Charlie Kirk killing - Politico - September 17th, 2025 [September 17th, 2025]
- Does the First Amendment protect you at work? Charlie Kirk critics are learning the answer - The Hill - September 17th, 2025 [September 17th, 2025]
- Pam Bondi Is Clueless About the First Amendment - New York Magazine - September 17th, 2025 [September 17th, 2025]
- The rights free speech defenders declare war on First Amendment over Charlie Kirk murder reactions - The Independent - September 17th, 2025 [September 17th, 2025]
- Federal judge overturns part of Floridas book ban law, drawing on nearly 100 years of precedent protecting First Amendment access to ideas - The... - September 17th, 2025 [September 17th, 2025]
- How online reactions to Charlie Kirk's killing test limits of First Amendment - USA Today - September 17th, 2025 [September 17th, 2025]
- From TikTok to the First Amendment: Exploring journalism and democracy in a USC Annenberg course open to all majors - USC Annenberg - September 17th, 2025 [September 17th, 2025]
- Charlie Kirk comments got them fired: Do they have First Amendment protection? - NewsNation - September 17th, 2025 [September 17th, 2025]
- Law professor on First Amendment and social media in the wake of Charlie Kirk assassination - WCTV - September 17th, 2025 [September 17th, 2025]
- Hiding Behind Kirk, Team Trump Launches 'Biggest Assault on the First Amendment' in Modern US History - Common Dreams - September 17th, 2025 [September 17th, 2025]
- Donald Trump vs the First Amendment - The Spectator World - September 17th, 2025 [September 17th, 2025]
- New Yorks Ban on Addictive Social Media Feeds for Kids Takes Shape With Proposed Rules - First Amendment Watch - September 17th, 2025 [September 17th, 2025]
- Republicans are honoring Charlie Kirks memory by declaring war on the First Amendment - The Verge - September 17th, 2025 [September 17th, 2025]
- Charlie Kirk comments got them fired: Do they have First Amendment protection? - MSN - September 17th, 2025 [September 17th, 2025]
- South Bend responds to teacher comments about Charlie Kirk's death, cites First Amendment - South Bend Tribune - September 15th, 2025 [September 15th, 2025]
- What are the limits of free speech? Online controversies spark First Amendment debate - WKRC - September 13th, 2025 [September 13th, 2025]
- Are teachers' social media posts on Charlie Kirk protected by the First Amendment? - CBS News - September 13th, 2025 [September 13th, 2025]
- Federal Court Blocks Trump Administrations Freeze of Grants to Harvard University: Implications for First Amendment and Title VI Enforcement -... - September 13th, 2025 [September 13th, 2025]
- Dunleavy: A tribute to Charlie Kirk and the First Amendment - Juneau Empire - September 13th, 2025 [September 13th, 2025]
- This Just In: The Very First Amendment - Chapelboro.com - September 13th, 2025 [September 13th, 2025]
- FWC is limiting social media comments, raising First Amendment concerns - Creative Loafing Tampa - September 13th, 2025 [September 13th, 2025]
- On the First Amendment and the Fourth Estate - Boca Beacon - September 13th, 2025 [September 13th, 2025]
- WATCH: The first amendment vs. fascism - The.Ink | Anand Giridharadas - September 11th, 2025 [September 11th, 2025]
- Opinion | Vivek Ramaswamy: An Ohio County vs. the First Amendment - The Wall Street Journal - September 11th, 2025 [September 11th, 2025]
- Former Backpage CEO Gets Three Years of Probation After Testifying at Trial About Sites Sex Ads - First Amendment Watch - September 11th, 2025 [September 11th, 2025]
- Charlie Kirk Died Protecting the First Amendment Says Grant County GOP Chair - Source ONE News - September 11th, 2025 [September 11th, 2025]
- This school year, attacks on the First Amendment extend to our schoolhouse doors | Opinion - Bergen Record - September 9th, 2025 [September 9th, 2025]
- A Decades-Long Peace Vigil Outside the White House Is Dismantled After Trumps Order - First Amendment Watch - September 9th, 2025 [September 9th, 2025]
- Woman sues Madison County attorney, former Madison city clerk over alleged violation of First Amendment rights - norfolkneradio.com - September 9th, 2025 [September 9th, 2025]
- Talkative Defendant Is Told He Misunderstands First Amendment By Harvey Weinstein Judge - Inner City Press - September 9th, 2025 [September 9th, 2025]
- 'South Park' keeps tying Trump to Satan. What to know about satire and the First Amendment - USA Today - September 6th, 2025 [September 6th, 2025]
- Man told to take down Trump flag says it's a First Amendment issue. Mayor says it has to be on a flag pole - News 12 - Westchester - September 6th, 2025 [September 6th, 2025]
- First Amendment Rights and Protesting in Tennessee - Nashville Banner - September 6th, 2025 [September 6th, 2025]
- Northwestern University President Says He Will Resign Following Tenure Marked by White House Tension - First Amendment Watch - September 6th, 2025 [September 6th, 2025]
- Surprise resident's First Amendment fight against city far from over one year later - yourvalley.net - September 6th, 2025 [September 6th, 2025]
- Letter: Trump crushes the First Amendment - InForum - September 5th, 2025 [September 5th, 2025]
- From Kozminski to Cherwitz: The TVPA's Transformation from Anti-Trafficking Tool to First Amendment Weapon - The National Law Review - September 5th, 2025 [September 5th, 2025]
- Graham Linehans arrest shows we need a UK First Amendment - Spiked - September 5th, 2025 [September 5th, 2025]
- First Amendment battles loom over another religious law in Texas - yahoo.com - September 5th, 2025 [September 5th, 2025]
- Trump Administration Agrees To Restore Health Websites and Data - First Amendment Watch - September 5th, 2025 [September 5th, 2025]
- MFIA Clinic Urges FTC to Withdraw Proposed Consent Order on First Amendment Grounds - Yale Law School - September 5th, 2025 [September 5th, 2025]