Say ‘Yes’ to the First Amendment Minding The Campus – Minding The Campus
For in politics, as in religion, it is equally absurd to aim at making proselytes by fire and sword. Heresies in either can rarely be cured by persecution. Alexander Hamilton, Federalist 1
All university-level students should read, study, and discuss The Federalist Papers (178788). This most sacred document of the American founding explains the logic of the Constitution. Its more important than ever to understand that logic because the advent of Artificial Intelligence means that we are rapidly approaching a dystopian singularity that requires serious thinking about individual rights and freedom. For this reason, above all others, the sanctimonious mob that currently tyrannizes academia poses a major risk to Western Civilization. The time is now. Either we learn from the past by taking it seriously, or else we will be consumed by our future. A good exercise is to write an essay that supplements The Federalist Papers for todays citizen. This is one of mine. If you object, then write your own.
Ive already written a basic introduction to the negative logic that is the scientific basis for the Bill of Rights. Consider this lesson an immediate corollary. The First Amendment to the United States Constitution is vital above all the others, and theres a single sociological reason that so much of what we hear in public discourse undermines it.
First, the reasons the First Amendment is vital. The right to believe and say anything is fundamental to the proper functioning of markets and political systems. Mental freedom provides the antifragile underpinnings of commerce and the law. Without competition among a variety of products, services, and ideas, we end up making big decisions without the price signals and public debates that allow us to consider important information.
Think of East Germany or North Korea. Life becomes painful, gray, feeble, and unfixable without prices and ideas. And when that happens, external and internal changes become problematic. Those who control rigid markets and governments dig themselves into negative feedback loops. They grow even more tyrannical because they cant see change as creative destruction. To them, change amounts to apocalyptic suicide. An alternative product or idea can make it obsolete overnight.
In the social sphere, reasoning must operate effectively, even though achieving absolute truth and perfection is impossible. Allowing individuals to think freely and express diverse ideas is essential for this purpose. Similarly, in markets, having a wide range of options contributes to stability, especially when facing creative destruction.
A product or service can almost always be improved upon or substitutedi.e., just as theres no ideal political arrangement, theres no absolutely true or perfect outcome to market competition. But thats precisely why we must keep these active as systemic processes and not end goals. Not all products and services will endure, and when they become obsolete a lot of people will lose their livelihoods and no longer get what they want over the short term. Thats precisely why options are important: so that people can make and do other things and adapt to change more easily. Moreover, in politics, as it is with markets, stagnation can lead to decay and corruption, which accentuates the pain of social and commercial change.
But how do we know finally what is good and proper in government and business?
The answer is that we dont. We cant. If we did, human activity would be meaningless and would just make the world a more loathsome place. We dont intuitively know whats best. Individuals will have opinions. Some individuals will be more right more often than others. But if we merely assume that all human beings can be wrong at least once in life, then we still must discover what is preferable through individual experimentation and comparison.
Now, for the sociological reason, the First Amendment is always under attack: the mob.
Were social creatures. Theres no doubt about that. We need partners, family, and friends. The kindness, communication, and company of others are desirable and keep us sane. We have a tribal instinct wired into us. Sacrifice and cooperation have always been keys to our survival during a crisis. But it goes deeper than that. We even need enemies to coordinate and locate our groups. For these reasons, the social instinct is so intense that when we lack a collective identity, well make one up out of thin air. Its also so strong that when we sense that our group is threatened, it alters how we feel, think, and behave. And perhaps the true tragedy is that the mob instinct has its most powerful effect on successful people. In other words, the very people who, in theory, should be much more inclined to favor rugged individualism and independent thinking are the ones most vulnerable to groupthink.
Its this group instinct thats constantly attacking the First Amendment, threatening and retarding human progress in social, economic, and scientific terms.
Our tribal confirmation bias means truth unavoidably devolves into tyranny at some point. While its true that we need others, its not true that, therefore, others should be allowed to trump our individuality. But they do, and we let them. Look at every major institution in the United States today. Conformity to the most irrational and diabolical ideas is now the norm.
At universities, corporations, and government agencies in the United States, its now routinely expected that people must agree that the accused are guilty until proven innocent, that men can be women if they so choose, and that we must live according to a racial and sexual hierarchy with black homosexual females at the top and white heterosexual men at the bottom. Theres even a convoluted ideology called intersectionality, which attempts to define and promote people by their collective identities rather than their abilities or accomplishments.
America is now the antithesis of itself.
These ideas are dominant at our most respected institutions. MIT, arguably the most advanced university on earth, is plagued by well over 75 DEI administrators. Why? It turns out that, on aggregate, the smarter you are, the more prone you are to accede to the pressure of the group. This does not mean that a few brilliant individuals wont emerge to challenge the status quo. It means that most brilliant individuals will make sacrifices to the tribe in order to assuage their guilt and fear.
Ive listened to some very smart peopleCharles Murray, Richard Brookhiser, Pedro Schwartz, Mark Cuban, and Jonah Goldbergmaintain that Donald J. Trump is bad for America because hes autocratic, corrupt, and ill-mannered. But what they object to is style not substance.
There are a lot of things wrong with Trump. Hes human. However, refusing to see that government officials have targeted him unjustly and, in the process, unwittingly proven his absolute innocence in juridical terms means disregarding the only method we have of assessing such matters. When over thirty highly trained lawyers, including Robert Mueller, Andrew Weissmann, and Rush Atkinsona team that NBC News called the best prosecutors in the businesswere given more money than the Vatican and two years to investigate Trump, they found nothing. All they could say was, we cant prove his innocence. When a team of lawyers with such extreme incentives, skills, and biases resorts to inverting the essence of Western jurisprudencei.e., the principle that citizens are innocent until proven guiltythen, as far as such things can be determined in the public sphere, Trump is the antithesis of corruption. He might be the most pristine president the U.S. has ever had, and all claims to the contrary are most likely deceptive, emotional, and self-interested.
Furthermore, the notion that Trumps disagreeableness disqualifies him from public office ignores the most realistic political advice formulated by everyone from Thucydides to Machiavelli: historians and citizens must evaluate the actions and policies of their leaders and eschew the pretense of fretting about their personal virtues.
What does all of this have to do with the First Amendment?
Well, many very smart people are incapable of reason in politics. Theyve succumbed to the sacred anger of the crowd. Theyre either joining that crowd or appeasing it out of fear or greed, or both. But theyre not thinking logically about the differences between Joe Biden and Donald Trump. Why? Because powerful people are those most at risk of crowd violence. French anthropologist and sociologist Ren Girard wrote multiple books about what he called the scapegoat mechanism, wherein the mob attacks any wrinkle of difference in the social field to which it might attribute the cause of any crisis that throws it into a frenzy.
I call this the Romantic anti-hero effect.
Behind everyones romantic nightmare, from Dr. Frankenstein to Dracula to Dorien Gray, is the perception of evil as weirdness. This explains why so many talented and successful people spout utter nonsense when it comes to politics. Great actors, musicians, scientists, engineers, and even entrepreneurs and financiers feel the weight of the public eye. Thus, they tend to hold political views that they think will placate the mob. Its usually not even conscious. Its just an instinct that ensures their survival.
Recently, Dr. Jay Bhattacharya, an incredibly smart man with whom I agree on just about everything, tweeted that his mother had been watching CNN until 2021 when she saw a report that criticized her son. Dr. Bhattacharya was proud to report that his mother no longer watches CNN because she does not suffer from the Gell-Mann amnesia effect. But with all due respect, here is the problem.
A very smart mans mother, a woman he claims does not suffer from an inability to perceive the propaganda of a major news service, was still watching CNN as late as 2021. In fact, she didnt stop watching CNN until the networks reporters took a swipe at her own son. Very smart people spend so much time in the light of moral rectitude and political certainty that they confuse these for reason (see the movie Poltergeist, 1982).
You might object. You might hold that society must regulate the First Amendment because someone might act on their evil thoughts or the evil thoughts of others. Okay, hurting people is bad. But we punish those who hurt people, not those who express the ideas that might inspire them. This is the only we way we can lay claim to the idea that people should think before they act. Moreover, the definition of suffering is itself part of our problem. To harm the bodies or property of others is wrong. But people will do anything for money and approval. This especially includes false claims to have been hurt by anyone who angers the mob. Further, what people consider an evil idea today might be good tomorrow, and vice versa.
Censuring what we consider evil can only promote tyranny in the end, not alleviate it.
In sum, yes, there will always be moments when the principle of liberty gets elided due to a crisis or a particular case, but we must always reassert that principle. This is what Reagan meant when he said that freedom is never more than one generation away from extinction. And freedom of thought is the most basic principle of all, the one upon which depend the other personal freedoms listed in the Bill of Rights.
This is simply because without the freedom to think and say what we want, sooner or later, well find ourselves unable to defend all the other personal rights. Artificial Intelligence is rapidly approaching the ability to read our minds. By definition, many smart and powerful people will use this technology to offer up all of our rights to the mob as a means of gaining power over and safety from that same mob. And nobody will be allowed to object without tremendous risk to themselves. I find the moral argument for my personal liberty the most compelling one. Who are you to make me confess or conform? However, given that individuals shape the world by developing the ideas, tools, and practices that enhance it, the true stakes here include wealth creation, scientific progress, and our ability to improve life.
Art by Joe Nalven
Eric-Clifford Graf (PhD, Virginia, 1997) teaches and writes about the liberal tradition as authored by men like Alexander Hamilton, Frederick Douglass, and Jorge Luis Borges. His latest book is ANATOMY OF LIBERTY IN DON QUIJOTE DE LA MANCHA (Lexington, 2021). All of his work can be found here: ericcliffordgraf.academia.edu/research.
View all posts
Excerpt from:
Say 'Yes' to the First Amendment Minding The Campus - Minding The Campus
- Expressive Discrimination: Universities' First Amendment Right to Affirmative Action Part 2 - Reason - March 3rd, 2025 [March 3rd, 2025]
- Inside Israel's Plan To Resume the War and 'Eradicate Hamas.' Plus, Trump's Press Pool Takeover Is Not an Assault on the First Amendment. - Washington... - March 3rd, 2025 [March 3rd, 2025]
- Expressive Discrimination: Universities' First Amendment Right to Affirmative Action - Reason - March 3rd, 2025 [March 3rd, 2025]
- OPINION: Attacking the First Amendment and America's free press - Midland Daily News - March 3rd, 2025 [March 3rd, 2025]
- Press pool takeover drowns First Amendment - Freedom of the Press Foundation - March 3rd, 2025 [March 3rd, 2025]
- First Amendment Victory! Wyoming Airport Agrees to Settlement After Rejecting PETA Ad - PETA - March 3rd, 2025 [March 3rd, 2025]
- Our View: Theres nothing murky about the First Amendment - Palestine Herald Press - March 3rd, 2025 [March 3rd, 2025]
- Ohio Universitys complicated history with the First Amendment and student expression - The New Political - March 3rd, 2025 [March 3rd, 2025]
- A free press makes a country free The First Amendment protects the liberty of all - Hawaii Tribune-Herald - March 3rd, 2025 [March 3rd, 2025]
- Whats the First Amendment Got to Do With It? The White Houses Associated Press Ban - Law.com - March 3rd, 2025 [March 3rd, 2025]
- Opinion | The First Amendment Isnt on Trumps Side - The Wall Street Journal - March 3rd, 2025 [March 3rd, 2025]
- Trump Tries To Carve Out a First Amendment Exception for 'Fake News' - Reason - March 3rd, 2025 [March 3rd, 2025]
- MTHS receives its 15th First Amendment Press Freedom Award - MLT News - March 3rd, 2025 [March 3rd, 2025]
- The White House takeover of the press pool is a brazen attack on the First Amendment - MSNBC - March 3rd, 2025 [March 3rd, 2025]
- Donald Trump violated the First Amendment when he barred The Associated Press from the White House - The Observer - March 3rd, 2025 [March 3rd, 2025]
- D.C.'s U.S. Attorney Is a Menace to the First Amendment - Reason - March 3rd, 2025 [March 3rd, 2025]
- Ominous Move to Strip Americans of First Amendment Rights - DCReport - March 3rd, 2025 [March 3rd, 2025]
- Editorial New York Daily News: A free press makes a country free The First Amendment protects the liberty of all - The Daily News Online - March 3rd, 2025 [March 3rd, 2025]
- Narrow Applicability Is Not the Same As Narrow Tailoring: Applying the First Amendment in First Choice Womens Resource Centers v. Platkin - The... - February 27th, 2025 [February 27th, 2025]
- More to Every Story: First Amendment rights and public events - KREM.com - February 27th, 2025 [February 27th, 2025]
- Trumps lawsuit barred by the First Amendment, pollsters team argues - The Washington Post - February 27th, 2025 [February 27th, 2025]
- Judge orders local newspaper to remove editorial; owner says this violates First Amendment rights - WLBT - February 27th, 2025 [February 27th, 2025]
- AP sues Trump officials over Oval Office ban, citing First Amendment - Axios - February 27th, 2025 [February 27th, 2025]
- A free press makes a country free: The First Amendment protects the liberty of all - New York Daily News - February 27th, 2025 [February 27th, 2025]
- Ilya Shapiro is back . . . with a new book First Amendment News 458 - Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression - February 20th, 2025 [February 20th, 2025]
- People exercising their First Amendment rights aren't 'wreckers' | Letters - South Bend Tribune - February 20th, 2025 [February 20th, 2025]
- Trump bans AP and words he doesn't like. 'Free speech' was never about First Amendment. | Opinion - USA TODAY - February 20th, 2025 [February 20th, 2025]
- Silenced: The Joby Weeks Case and the Erosion of First Amendment Rights - NewsBreak - February 20th, 2025 [February 20th, 2025]
- White House barring AP from press events violates the First Amendment - Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression - February 16th, 2025 [February 16th, 2025]
- A New Hampshire town and a bakery owner are headed for trial in a First Amendment dispute - The Associated Press - February 16th, 2025 [February 16th, 2025]
- New Hampshire town and bakery take their 'First Amendment' legal battle over colossal pastry mural to trial - New York Post - February 16th, 2025 [February 16th, 2025]
- A.P. Accuses White House of Violating First Amendment - The New York Times - February 16th, 2025 [February 16th, 2025]
- First Amendment law legend: Fight back - Freedom of the Press Foundation - February 16th, 2025 [February 16th, 2025]
- First Amendment in Trump's second term: 'We're going to be busy,' free speech group says - Tallahassee Democrat - February 16th, 2025 [February 16th, 2025]
- Expression Over Radio Waves Is Not Exempt from the First Amendment - The Federalist Society - February 16th, 2025 [February 16th, 2025]
- Iowa lawmakers try again to pass anti-SLAPP bill expediting First Amendment cases - Iowa Capital Dispatch - February 16th, 2025 [February 16th, 2025]
- Three Senators Blast FCC for 'Weaponizing its Authority,' Cite First Amendment Concerns - Adweek - February 16th, 2025 [February 16th, 2025]
- The AP says Trump blocking its reporter from Oval Office over not using Gulf of America "violates the First Amendment" - CBS News - February 16th, 2025 [February 16th, 2025]
- Wave of state-level AI bills raise First Amendment problems - Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression - February 16th, 2025 [February 16th, 2025]
- Legendary First Amendment lawyer begs press to fight Trumps attacks - Freedom of the Press Foundation - February 16th, 2025 [February 16th, 2025]
- Timothy Zicks Executive Watch: Introduction First Amendment News 457 - Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression - February 16th, 2025 [February 16th, 2025]
- Trump accused of violating First Amendment after AP reporter barred from event over Gulf of America renaming - The Independent - February 16th, 2025 [February 16th, 2025]
- Editorial: Trump goes to war on the First Amendment - Detroit News - February 16th, 2025 [February 16th, 2025]
- Voices are meant to be heard: the First Amendment and you - Northern Iowan - February 16th, 2025 [February 16th, 2025]
- CBS News Lesley Stahl to be honored at First Amendment Awards - Editor And Publisher Magazine - February 16th, 2025 [February 16th, 2025]
- The AP says Trump blocking its reporter from Oval Office over not using Gulf of America violates the First Amendment - KWTX - February 16th, 2025 [February 16th, 2025]
- Trump takes another dump on the First Amendment - Daily Kos - February 16th, 2025 [February 16th, 2025]
- Spreading the news and defending the First Amendment since August 1787 - Lexington Herald Leader - February 16th, 2025 [February 16th, 2025]
- Publishing Pro-Hamas Propaganda Is Protected by First Amendment - Reason - February 7th, 2025 [February 7th, 2025]
- "Title VI Must Be Applied Consistent with First Amendment Principles" - Reason - February 7th, 2025 [February 7th, 2025]
- Coming soon: Executive Watch Tracking the Trump Administrations free speech record First Amendment News 456 - Foundation for Individual Rights and... - February 7th, 2025 [February 7th, 2025]
- Q&A: Professor emphasizes the impact the TikTok ban could have on the First Amendment - Elon News Network - February 7th, 2025 [February 7th, 2025]
- First Amendment Audit of ELPD Draws Widespread Attention Online - East Lansing Info - February 7th, 2025 [February 7th, 2025]
- Groups demand U.S. attorney for D.C. respect First Amendment - Freedom of the Press Foundation - February 7th, 2025 [February 7th, 2025]
- Maryland age assurance lawsuit shows NetChoice digging in on First Amendment - Biometric Update - February 7th, 2025 [February 7th, 2025]
- What does the first amendment protect during public comment? - Spectrum News 1 - February 7th, 2025 [February 7th, 2025]
- FOX News Trey Yingst to be honored at First Amendment Awards - Editor And Publisher Magazine - February 7th, 2025 [February 7th, 2025]
- NetChoice sues to block Marylands Kids Code, saying it violates the First Amendment - The Verge - February 7th, 2025 [February 7th, 2025]
- Stevens: Oklahoma tests First Amendment in move to fund Catholic charter school - The Post and Courier - February 7th, 2025 [February 7th, 2025]
- OPINION: Keeping the First Amendment on Facebook - Lebanon Reporter - February 7th, 2025 [February 7th, 2025]
- RFK Jr. wants to ban pharma ads on TV. The First Amendment may have something to say. - MSNBC - February 1st, 2025 [February 1st, 2025]
- Standing Up for the First Amendment: The Roundtable Submits Comment Letter Opposing Amicus Brief Disclosure Requirements - Philanthropy Roundtable - February 1st, 2025 [February 1st, 2025]
- Trial begins in First Amendment suit against St. John the Baptist Parish - The Lens NOLA - February 1st, 2025 [February 1st, 2025]
- RCFP reviews Pam Bondis record on newsgathering, First Amendment issues - Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press - February 1st, 2025 [February 1st, 2025]
- Texas county challenges First Amendment ruling on library book bans in 5th Circuit hearing - Yahoo! Voices - February 1st, 2025 [February 1st, 2025]
- Trump "Global Gag Rule" as to Abortion Likely Doesn't Violate the First Amendment - Reason - February 1st, 2025 [February 1st, 2025]
- It was a violation of our First Amendment rights: FIU students react to the TikTok ban - PantherNOW - February 1st, 2025 [February 1st, 2025]
- CWRU First Amendment clinic receives crucial grant from the Stanton Foundation - Crain's Cleveland Business - February 1st, 2025 [February 1st, 2025]
- Matt Gaetz says the First Amendment was "harmed gravely" by January 6 prosecutions - Media Matters for America - January 26th, 2025 [January 26th, 2025]
- New FCC Chair Revives Complaints About ABC, CBS And NBC Content That His Predecessor Rejected As "At Odds With The First Amendment" -... - January 26th, 2025 [January 26th, 2025]
- Trumps stated promise: Stop all government censorship and his free speech Executive Order First Amendment News 454 - Foundation for Individual Rights... - January 26th, 2025 [January 26th, 2025]
- We Must Protect The First Amendment At All Costs vs. No Thanks, Ill Just Take My Freedoms For Granted Until They Disappear - The Onion - January 26th, 2025 [January 26th, 2025]
- TikTok and the First Amendment Robert G. Natelson - Law & Liberty - January 26th, 2025 [January 26th, 2025]
- De Pere man sued city of Green Bay for violating his First Amendment rights. The city settled. - Green Bay Press Gazette - January 26th, 2025 [January 26th, 2025]
- UChicago Student Sues University, Alleging First Amendment and Tenant Rights Violations - The Chicago Maroon - January 26th, 2025 [January 26th, 2025]
- Dr. Rand Paul Introduces Free Speech Protection Act to Safeguard Americans First Amendment Rights Against Government Censorship - Senator Rand Paul - January 26th, 2025 [January 26th, 2025]
- Capistrano School District Accused of Trampling First Amendment Rights of Student - California Globe - January 26th, 2025 [January 26th, 2025]
- Jerry Zahorchak | Keeping the First Amendment on Facebook | Columns | tribdem.com - TribDem.com - January 26th, 2025 [January 26th, 2025]
- 2 blockbuster cases about the First Amendment and online speech - The Hill - January 26th, 2025 [January 26th, 2025]
- The First Amendment is First for a Reason - The Wilson Quarterly - January 26th, 2025 [January 26th, 2025]