The Coronavirus Protests Are Protected by the Constitution – The New York Times
Around the nation, state lockdown orders during the coronavirus pandemic have led to sharp debates over the trade-offs inherent in such orders. We have no doubt that states have and should have extremely broad authority to take steps to protect public health during an outbreak that has sickened so many Americans.
But we also have no doubt that some of the restrictions imposed by states are utterly inconsistent with the First Amendment.
Consider California. Three weeks ago, hundreds gathered at the Capitol to protest the state's stay-at-home order. In response, the California Highway Patrol indefinitely banned all in-person protests at state facilities.
Such a ban on protests is at odds with the way California treats other activities. Gov. Gavin Newsoms initial stay-at-home order carved out exceptions for socially distant exercise and visits to gas stations, pharmacies, grocery stores and other essential businesses. On May 8, Governor Newsom permitted bookstores, toy stores, clothing stores and florists to reopen for curbside delivery, yet the blanket ban on protests remains.
California is not alone in ignoring the constitutionally protected status of public protests. In New York City, protesters who were wearing masks and abiding by social distancing requirements were arrested or issued summonses. While we greatly, greatly respect the right of people to protest, there should not be protests taking place in the middle of a pandemic, New Yorks police commissioner, Dermot Shea, has said. Mayor Bill de Blasio has asserted that people who want to make their voices heard there are plenty of ways to do it without gathering in person.
The power of the states to restrict protests at parks and state capitols is very limited. States can surely prohibit violent protests, as the First Amendment protects the right of the people peaceably to assemble. But other restrictions must be narrowly tailored to serve a significant government interest, which is precisely what Californias ban is not.
California could permit protests on the condition that individuals abide by social distancing guidelines and mask rules. It could reasonably limit the number of protesters so that social distancing is feasible. To protect the health of state employees, it could impose buffer zones around entrances and exits at state buildings.
But that is not what California did. Instead, it chose to indefinitely strip Californians of their fundamental right to protest.
In one of the first rulings on the subject in the new Covid-19 world, a federal judge on May 8 upheld Californias ban on in-person protests. The court reasonably concluded that California has a legitimate interest in limiting person-to-person interactions and that permitting 500- or 1,000-person protests would undermine that interest.
But in the absence of any narrower alternative having been provided by the litigants, he upheld the ban. The courts decision was at a preliminary stage of the case and is subject to later change.
The courts ruling, which afforded the California order substantial deference, remains troubling. Applying the emergency measures test, the court held that it could strike down Californias ban only if it bore no real or substantial relation to public health, or if the measure was beyond all question a plain, palpable invasion of rights secured by fundamental law. The Supreme Court developed that test to ensure that states have the authority they need to protect public health; it is not a license for suspending constitutional rights.
Protecting public health while preserving the freedoms of speech and assembly is no easy task amid a pandemic. But the Supreme Court has declared that the First Amendment reflects our profound national commitment to the principle that debate on public issues should be uninhibited, robust and wide-open.
Our commitment to public debate on public issues has been a lodestar through good times and bad. As our political leaders navigate our collective response to the worst public health crisis in a century, it is critical that we preserve, to the maximum extent possible, opportunities for political dissent. The First Amendment sometimes requires discomforting results to protect the liberties of our people.
Floyd Abrams, a constitutional lawyer who is a visiting lecturer at Yale Law School, is the author of The Soul of the First Amendment. John Langford is counsel at Protect Democracy.
The Times is committed to publishing a diversity of letters to the editor. Wed like to hear what you think about this or any of our articles. Here are some tips. And heres our email: letters@nytimes.com.
Follow The New York Times Opinion section on Facebook, Twitter (@NYTopinion) and Instagram.
View original post here:
The Coronavirus Protests Are Protected by the Constitution - The New York Times
- Kansas Statehouse clownery has torn First Amendment to shreds. Who will tape it back together? - Kansas Reflector - March 18th, 2025 [March 18th, 2025]
- Is Mahmoud Khalil protected by the First Amendment? - CNN - March 18th, 2025 [March 18th, 2025]
- D.C. Media's Gridiron Dinner Features A Toast To The First Amendment --- And Not To The President - Deadline - March 18th, 2025 [March 18th, 2025]
- Mayors Threat to Close Miami Cinema Over No Other Land Screening Condemned by Film Groups as First Amendment Violation - Yahoo - March 18th, 2025 [March 18th, 2025]
- TSA Screeners' Union Sues the Trump Administration for Violating Its First Amendment Rights - Reason - March 18th, 2025 [March 18th, 2025]
- Kevin McCabe: Why defending the First Amendment means protecting the Second - Must Read Alaska - March 18th, 2025 [March 18th, 2025]
- Murder the Truth explores the campaign against the First Amendment - The Washington Post - March 18th, 2025 [March 18th, 2025]
- The Trump-Musk Administration Is Running Out of Ways to Ignore the First Amendment - Balls & Strikes - March 18th, 2025 [March 18th, 2025]
- From Gods to Google: DU Law Professor Sounds Alarm Over First Amendment and Technology Regulation - University of Denver Newsroom - March 18th, 2025 [March 18th, 2025]
- Intimidating abridgments and political stunts First Amendment News 461 - Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression - March 18th, 2025 [March 18th, 2025]
- Opinion | The Khalil case is a threat to First Amendment rights - The Washington Post - March 18th, 2025 [March 18th, 2025]
- Fallout from campus protests sparks debate on limits of the First Amendment - Spectrum News - March 18th, 2025 [March 18th, 2025]
- Troy Carico: Stabbing the First Amendment in the back in Alabama | - 1819 News - March 18th, 2025 [March 18th, 2025]
- Donald Trump Is Tearing Up The First Amendment - HuffPost - March 18th, 2025 [March 18th, 2025]
- Sorry Mahmoud Khalil, Aliens Do Not Have the Same First Amendment Rights as American Citizens - Immigration Blog - March 18th, 2025 [March 18th, 2025]
- BREAKING: Bill Nye to headline annual Loyolan First Amendment Week - Los Angeles Loyolan - March 18th, 2025 [March 18th, 2025]
- Spokane and Bonner county sheriff's offices can no longer hide or delete critical Facebook comments after First Amendment concerns, judges rule - The... - March 18th, 2025 [March 18th, 2025]
- Paula Rigano: Last time I checked, the First Amendment still stood - GazetteNET - March 18th, 2025 [March 18th, 2025]
- Trump is using antisemitism as a pretext for a war on the first amendment | Judith Levine - The Guardian - March 18th, 2025 [March 18th, 2025]
- Professor Can Continue with First Amendment Claim Over Denial of Raise for Including Expurgated Slurs on Exam - Reason - March 18th, 2025 [March 18th, 2025]
- Free Mahmoud Khalil and protect students exercising their First Amendment rights! - MoveOn's petitions - March 18th, 2025 [March 18th, 2025]
- Guy Ciarrocchi: The lesson from Covid the experts hate our First Amendment - Broad + Liberty - March 18th, 2025 [March 18th, 2025]
- Trump Administration Faces Growing Backlash Over First Amendment Concerns and Threats to Free Speech - Arise News - March 18th, 2025 [March 18th, 2025]
- The Lobby, Mahmoud Khalil & the First Amendment - Consortium News - March 18th, 2025 [March 18th, 2025]
- Expressive Discrimination: Universities' First Amendment Right to Affirmative Action Part 2 - Reason - March 3rd, 2025 [March 3rd, 2025]
- Inside Israel's Plan To Resume the War and 'Eradicate Hamas.' Plus, Trump's Press Pool Takeover Is Not an Assault on the First Amendment. - Washington... - March 3rd, 2025 [March 3rd, 2025]
- Expressive Discrimination: Universities' First Amendment Right to Affirmative Action - Reason - March 3rd, 2025 [March 3rd, 2025]
- OPINION: Attacking the First Amendment and America's free press - Midland Daily News - March 3rd, 2025 [March 3rd, 2025]
- Press pool takeover drowns First Amendment - Freedom of the Press Foundation - March 3rd, 2025 [March 3rd, 2025]
- First Amendment Victory! Wyoming Airport Agrees to Settlement After Rejecting PETA Ad - PETA - March 3rd, 2025 [March 3rd, 2025]
- Our View: Theres nothing murky about the First Amendment - Palestine Herald Press - March 3rd, 2025 [March 3rd, 2025]
- Ohio Universitys complicated history with the First Amendment and student expression - The New Political - March 3rd, 2025 [March 3rd, 2025]
- A free press makes a country free The First Amendment protects the liberty of all - Hawaii Tribune-Herald - March 3rd, 2025 [March 3rd, 2025]
- Whats the First Amendment Got to Do With It? The White Houses Associated Press Ban - Law.com - March 3rd, 2025 [March 3rd, 2025]
- Opinion | The First Amendment Isnt on Trumps Side - The Wall Street Journal - March 3rd, 2025 [March 3rd, 2025]
- Trump Tries To Carve Out a First Amendment Exception for 'Fake News' - Reason - March 3rd, 2025 [March 3rd, 2025]
- MTHS receives its 15th First Amendment Press Freedom Award - MLT News - March 3rd, 2025 [March 3rd, 2025]
- The White House takeover of the press pool is a brazen attack on the First Amendment - MSNBC - March 3rd, 2025 [March 3rd, 2025]
- Donald Trump violated the First Amendment when he barred The Associated Press from the White House - The Observer - March 3rd, 2025 [March 3rd, 2025]
- D.C.'s U.S. Attorney Is a Menace to the First Amendment - Reason - March 3rd, 2025 [March 3rd, 2025]
- Ominous Move to Strip Americans of First Amendment Rights - DCReport - March 3rd, 2025 [March 3rd, 2025]
- Editorial New York Daily News: A free press makes a country free The First Amendment protects the liberty of all - The Daily News Online - March 3rd, 2025 [March 3rd, 2025]
- Narrow Applicability Is Not the Same As Narrow Tailoring: Applying the First Amendment in First Choice Womens Resource Centers v. Platkin - The... - February 27th, 2025 [February 27th, 2025]
- More to Every Story: First Amendment rights and public events - KREM.com - February 27th, 2025 [February 27th, 2025]
- Trumps lawsuit barred by the First Amendment, pollsters team argues - The Washington Post - February 27th, 2025 [February 27th, 2025]
- Judge orders local newspaper to remove editorial; owner says this violates First Amendment rights - WLBT - February 27th, 2025 [February 27th, 2025]
- AP sues Trump officials over Oval Office ban, citing First Amendment - Axios - February 27th, 2025 [February 27th, 2025]
- A free press makes a country free: The First Amendment protects the liberty of all - New York Daily News - February 27th, 2025 [February 27th, 2025]
- Ilya Shapiro is back . . . with a new book First Amendment News 458 - Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression - February 20th, 2025 [February 20th, 2025]
- People exercising their First Amendment rights aren't 'wreckers' | Letters - South Bend Tribune - February 20th, 2025 [February 20th, 2025]
- Trump bans AP and words he doesn't like. 'Free speech' was never about First Amendment. | Opinion - USA TODAY - February 20th, 2025 [February 20th, 2025]
- Silenced: The Joby Weeks Case and the Erosion of First Amendment Rights - NewsBreak - February 20th, 2025 [February 20th, 2025]
- White House barring AP from press events violates the First Amendment - Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression - February 16th, 2025 [February 16th, 2025]
- A New Hampshire town and a bakery owner are headed for trial in a First Amendment dispute - The Associated Press - February 16th, 2025 [February 16th, 2025]
- New Hampshire town and bakery take their 'First Amendment' legal battle over colossal pastry mural to trial - New York Post - February 16th, 2025 [February 16th, 2025]
- A.P. Accuses White House of Violating First Amendment - The New York Times - February 16th, 2025 [February 16th, 2025]
- First Amendment law legend: Fight back - Freedom of the Press Foundation - February 16th, 2025 [February 16th, 2025]
- First Amendment in Trump's second term: 'We're going to be busy,' free speech group says - Tallahassee Democrat - February 16th, 2025 [February 16th, 2025]
- Expression Over Radio Waves Is Not Exempt from the First Amendment - The Federalist Society - February 16th, 2025 [February 16th, 2025]
- Iowa lawmakers try again to pass anti-SLAPP bill expediting First Amendment cases - Iowa Capital Dispatch - February 16th, 2025 [February 16th, 2025]
- Three Senators Blast FCC for 'Weaponizing its Authority,' Cite First Amendment Concerns - Adweek - February 16th, 2025 [February 16th, 2025]
- The AP says Trump blocking its reporter from Oval Office over not using Gulf of America "violates the First Amendment" - CBS News - February 16th, 2025 [February 16th, 2025]
- Wave of state-level AI bills raise First Amendment problems - Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression - February 16th, 2025 [February 16th, 2025]
- Legendary First Amendment lawyer begs press to fight Trumps attacks - Freedom of the Press Foundation - February 16th, 2025 [February 16th, 2025]
- Timothy Zicks Executive Watch: Introduction First Amendment News 457 - Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression - February 16th, 2025 [February 16th, 2025]
- Trump accused of violating First Amendment after AP reporter barred from event over Gulf of America renaming - The Independent - February 16th, 2025 [February 16th, 2025]
- Editorial: Trump goes to war on the First Amendment - Detroit News - February 16th, 2025 [February 16th, 2025]
- Voices are meant to be heard: the First Amendment and you - Northern Iowan - February 16th, 2025 [February 16th, 2025]
- CBS News Lesley Stahl to be honored at First Amendment Awards - Editor And Publisher Magazine - February 16th, 2025 [February 16th, 2025]
- The AP says Trump blocking its reporter from Oval Office over not using Gulf of America violates the First Amendment - KWTX - February 16th, 2025 [February 16th, 2025]
- Trump takes another dump on the First Amendment - Daily Kos - February 16th, 2025 [February 16th, 2025]
- Spreading the news and defending the First Amendment since August 1787 - Lexington Herald Leader - February 16th, 2025 [February 16th, 2025]
- Publishing Pro-Hamas Propaganda Is Protected by First Amendment - Reason - February 7th, 2025 [February 7th, 2025]
- "Title VI Must Be Applied Consistent with First Amendment Principles" - Reason - February 7th, 2025 [February 7th, 2025]
- Coming soon: Executive Watch Tracking the Trump Administrations free speech record First Amendment News 456 - Foundation for Individual Rights and... - February 7th, 2025 [February 7th, 2025]
- Q&A: Professor emphasizes the impact the TikTok ban could have on the First Amendment - Elon News Network - February 7th, 2025 [February 7th, 2025]
- First Amendment Audit of ELPD Draws Widespread Attention Online - East Lansing Info - February 7th, 2025 [February 7th, 2025]
- Groups demand U.S. attorney for D.C. respect First Amendment - Freedom of the Press Foundation - February 7th, 2025 [February 7th, 2025]
- Maryland age assurance lawsuit shows NetChoice digging in on First Amendment - Biometric Update - February 7th, 2025 [February 7th, 2025]
- What does the first amendment protect during public comment? - Spectrum News 1 - February 7th, 2025 [February 7th, 2025]