U.S. Citizens and Russian Intelligence Officers Charged with … – Department of Justice
A federal grand jury in Tampa, Florida, returned a superseding indictment charging four U.S. citizens and three Russian nationals with working on behalf of the Russian government and in conjunction with the Russian Federal Security Service (FSB) to conduct a multi-year foreign malign influence campaign in the United States. Among other conduct, the superseding indictment alleges that the Russian defendants recruited, funded and directed U.S. political groups to act as unregistered illegal agents of the Russian government and sow discord and spread pro-Russian propaganda; the indicted intelligence officers, in particular, participated in covertly funding and directing candidates for local office within the United States.
Additionally, in a separate case out of the District of Columbia, a criminal complaint was unsealed charging Russian national Natalia Burlinova with conspiring with an FSB officer to act as an illegal agent of Russia in the United States.
Russias foreign intelligence service allegedly weaponized our First Amendment rights freedoms Russia denies its own citizens to divide Americans and interfere in elections in the United States, said Assistant Attorney General Matthew G. Olsen of the Justice Departments National Security Division. The department will not hesitate to expose and prosecute those who sow discord and corrupt U.S. elections in service of hostile foreign interests, regardless of whether the culprits are U.S. citizens or foreign individuals abroad.
Efforts by the Russian government to secretly influence U.S. elections will not be tolerated, said Assistant Attorney General Kenneth A. Polite, Jr. of the Justice Departments Criminal Division. As todays announcement demonstrates, the Criminal Division is committed to eradicating foreign malign influence from the U.S. political system and helping ensure the integrity of our elections.
Todays announcement paints a harrowing picture of Russian government actions and the lengths to which the FSB will go to interfere with our elections, sow discord in our nation and ultimately recruit U.S citizens to their efforts, said Acting Assistant Director Kurt Ronnow of the FBIs Counterintelligence Division. All Americans should be deeply concerned by the tactics employed by the FSB and remain vigilant to any attempt to undermine our democracy. The FBI remains committed to confronting this egregious behavior and ultimately disrupting our adversaries and those who act on their behalf.
United States v. Ionov, et al.
According to the superseding indictment returned in the Middle District of Florida, Aleksandr Viktorovich Ionov, a resident of Moscow, was the founder and president of the Anti-Globalization Movement of Russia (AGMR), an organization headquartered in Moscow, Russia, and funded by the Russian government. Ionov allegedly utilized AGMR to carry out Russias malign influence campaign. Ionovs influence efforts were allegedly directed and supervised by Moscow-based FSB officers, including indicted defendants Aleksey Borisovich Sukhodolov and Yegor Sergeyevich Popov.
The prosecution of this criminal conduct is essential to protecting the American public when foreign governments seek to inject themselves into the American political process, said U.S. Attorney Roger B. Handberg for the Middle District of Florida. We thank our partners at the FBI for their tireless investigation of these events and their commitment to ensure justice is done.
Among other illegal activities, the superseding indictment alleges that Ionov, Sukhodolov and Popov conspired to directly and substantially influence democratic elections in the United States by clandestinely funding and directing the political campaign of a particular candidate for local office in St. Petersburg, Florida, in 2019. For instance, the superseding indictment alleges that Popov expressly referred to this effort on behalf of the FSB as our election campaign, and Ionov referring to the candidate as the candidate whom we supervise. Ionov and Popov allegedly intended that this election interference plot would extend beyond the 2019 local election cycle in St. Petersburg, and subsequently discussed that the USA Presidential election was the FSBs main topic of the year.
Moreover, from at least November 2014 until July 2022, Ionov allegedly engaged in a years-long foreign malign influence campaign targeting the United States. As a part of the campaign, Ionov allegedly recruited members of political groups within the United States, including the African Peoples Socialist Party and the Uhuru Movement (collectively, the APSP) in Florida, Black Hammer in Georgia and a political group in California (referred to in the superseding indictment as U.S. Political Group 3), to participate in the influence campaign and act as agents of Russia in the United States, including the following indicted defendants:
One focus of Ionovs alleged influence operation was to create the appearance of American popular support for Russias annexation of territories in Ukraine. For example, in May 2020, Ionov allegedly sent a request he stated was from Russia, the Donetsk Peoples Republic an apparent reference to a Russian-occupied region in eastern Ukraine to Yeshitela and members of other U.S. political groups to make statements in support of the independence of the so-called Donetsk Peoples Republic, a Russian-backed breakaway state in eastern Ukraine. Ionov later allegedly touted to the FSB that Yeshitelas video-recorded statement of support was the first time that American nonprofit organizations congratulated citizens of the occupied region.
Ionovs use of the APSP to promote Russian propaganda relating to Ukraine allegedly continued after Russias invasion of Ukraine. On the day Russia invaded Ukraine, Feb. 24, 2022, Ionov allegedly emailed Nevel an URGENT MESSAGE which contained pro-Russian talking points in support of the invasion. Thereafter, throughout March 2022, the APSP repeatedly hosted Ionov via video conference to discuss the war, during which Ionov falsely stated that anyone who supported Ukraine also supported Naziism and white supremacy, and Yeshitela and another APSP member allegedly made statements of solidarity with the Russian government.
Ionov, Sukhodolov, Popov, Yeshitela, Hess, Nevel and Romain are charged with conspiring to have U.S. citizens act as illegal agents of the Russian government within the United States without providing prior notification to the Attorney General, as required by law. If convicted, they each face a maximum penalty of five years in prison. Yeshitela, Hess and Nevel are also charged with acting as agents of Russia within the United States without such prior notification. If convicted, they each face a maximum penalty of 10 years in prison. If convicted, a federal district court judge will determine any sentence after considering the U.S. Sentencing Guidelines and other statutory factors.
Assistant U.S. Attorneys Daniel J. Marcet and Risha Asokan for the Middle District of Florida, Trial Attorney Menno Goedman of the Justice Departments Counterintelligence and Export Control Section, and Trial Attorney Demetrius Sumner of the Criminal Divisions Public Integrity Section are prosecuting the case.
United States v. Burlinova
According to the affidavit in support of the criminal complaint unsealed in the District of Columbia, Russian national Natalia Burlinova, a resident of Moscow, conspired with an FSB officer to recruit U.S. citizens from academic and research institutions to travel to Russia to participate in a public diplomacy program called Meeting Russia. The program was operated by PICREADI, a Russian organization led by Burlinova, funded by the Russian government and devoted to promoting Russian national interests.
The defendant is accused of subverting our foreign agent notification laws to promote Russian national interests here in the United States, concealing from the public that her recruitment efforts were funded by a Russian security service, said U.S. Attorney Matthew M. Graves for the District of Columbia. We will continue to expose these serious crimes and hold all who perpetrate them accountable.
The affidavit alleges that the FSB officer provided funding and other support for Burlinovas foreign recruitment and her efforts to advance Russian interests in the United States. In return, Burlinova provided the FSB officer with extensive information about U.S. citizens who were recruited to attend her programs, including their rsums, passport information, photographs and analyses of their views toward Russia. Burlinova further identified for the FSB officer particular U.S. citizens who, in Burlinovas view, had expressed positive attitudes towards Russia and were prepared to continue to collaborate. During a recruitment trip to the United States in fall 2018, Burlinova met with U.S. citizens at various universities and research institutions and provided to photographs of her meetings to the FSB officer. The FSB officer used the information Burlinova provided prepare FSB intelligence reports. Burlinova never notified the Attorney General of these efforts or otherwise disclosed to the public that her recruitment efforts were supported and funded by a Russian security service.
Assistant U.S. Attorney Michael J. Friedman for the District of Columbia and Trial Attorney Emma D. Ellenrieder of the National Security Divisions Counterintelligence and Export Control Section are prosecuting the case.
An indictment and a complaint are merely an allegation. All defendants are presumed innocent until proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt in a court of law.
Original post:
U.S. Citizens and Russian Intelligence Officers Charged with ... - Department of Justice
- Takeaways from the Supreme Courts TikTok decision and what it may mean for the First Amendment - CNN - January 19th, 2025 [January 19th, 2025]
- Oral Argument in TikTok v. Garland: Does the First Amendment Apply, and How? - The Federalist Society - January 19th, 2025 [January 19th, 2025]
- TikTok, HamHom, and the First Amendment - Reason - January 19th, 2025 [January 19th, 2025]
- Supreme Court weighs First Amendment rights and porn in Texas case - NPR - January 19th, 2025 [January 19th, 2025]
- "Strong stand for the First Amendment": TikTok announces U.S. return after Trump promise to stay ban - Salon - January 19th, 2025 [January 19th, 2025]
- FCCs Rosenworcel Takes Parting Swipe at Incoming Trump Administration Over First Amendment - TV Technology - January 19th, 2025 [January 19th, 2025]
- Upholding TikTok ban, Supreme Court attacks First Amendment ahead of Trump inauguration - WSWS - January 19th, 2025 [January 19th, 2025]
- Rand Paul Reacts to TikTok Ruling: 'Violation of the First Amendment' - Newsweek - January 19th, 2025 [January 19th, 2025]
- Supreme Court Denies TikTok First Amendment Pass, Effectively Shuttering the Social Media Platform in the U.S. on Jan. 19 Unless Sold to Third Party -... - January 19th, 2025 [January 19th, 2025]
- "Satan loves the First Amendment" banner lawsuit allowed to proceed against Broward schools - CBS News - January 6th, 2025 [January 6th, 2025]
- Claim Against School Board That Refused to Display "Satan Loves the First Amendment" Banner Can Go Forward - Reason - January 6th, 2025 [January 6th, 2025]
- First Amendment gives way to national security: Countdown on for TikTok - Virginia Mercury - January 6th, 2025 [January 6th, 2025]
- Settlement puts Disneys business interests above First Amendment - Freedom of the Press Foundation - January 6th, 2025 [January 6th, 2025]
- Federal Judge Temporarily Blocks Protect Tennessee Minors Act Over First Amendment Concerns - SValleyNow.com | Local News for Marion County and the... - January 6th, 2025 [January 6th, 2025]
- Sullivan and the Central Meaning of the First Amendment Lee Levine & Matthew Schafer - Law & Liberty - January 1st, 2025 [January 1st, 2025]
- Tennessee age verification law blocked from taking effect due to First Amendment concerns - WZTV - January 1st, 2025 [January 1st, 2025]
- FIRE to SCOTUS: TikTok ban violates Americans' First Amendment rights - Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression - January 1st, 2025 [January 1st, 2025]
- Ald. Jim Gardiner Agrees to Pay $157K to Settle Lawsuit Claiming He Violated First Amendment by Blocking Critics From Official Facebook Page - WTTW... - January 1st, 2025 [January 1st, 2025]
- First Amendment the first casualty in Oklahoma school chiefs weird war on woke | Opinion - Wichita Eagle - January 1st, 2025 [January 1st, 2025]
- Donald Trump Asks Supreme Court to Delay TikTok Ban Over First Amendment Concerns - TheWrap - January 1st, 2025 [January 1st, 2025]
- How Washington State Stifles the First Amendment for the Incarcerated - Solitary Watch - December 22nd, 2024 [December 22nd, 2024]
- Opinion | Theres Still Time for the Senate to Support the First Amendment - The New York Times - December 22nd, 2024 [December 22nd, 2024]
- First Amendment Censorship Claims Against Stanford Internet Observatory Can Go Forward to Discovery as to Jurisdiction and Standing - Reason - December 22nd, 2024 [December 22nd, 2024]
- S. Ct. Will Hear First Amendment Challenge to TikTok Divestment on Jan. 10 - Reason - December 22nd, 2024 [December 22nd, 2024]
- Counterpoint: Reporters shouldnt have more First Amendment rights than the rest of us - Citrus County Chronicle - December 22nd, 2024 [December 22nd, 2024]
- Deal reached in First Amendment -Facebook lawsuit against Ald. Gardiner, as city agrees to pay some costs - Nadig Newspapers - December 22nd, 2024 [December 22nd, 2024]
- Iowa Republicans are afraid of the First Amendment - Bleeding Heartland - December 22nd, 2024 [December 22nd, 2024]
- TikTok Asks Supreme Court to Block Law Banning Its U.S. Operations - The New York Times - December 18th, 2024 [December 18th, 2024]
- Supreme Court agrees to hear TikToks First Amendment challenge to U.S. ban if not sold - Spectrum News NY1 - December 18th, 2024 [December 18th, 2024]
- Chris Hayes Says Trumps Media Lawsuits Are Meant to Open the Floodgates to Overturn Key First Amendment Rights | Video - Yahoo! Voices - December 18th, 2024 [December 18th, 2024]
- Media on the run: A sign of things to come in Trump times? First Amendment News 451 - Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression - December 18th, 2024 [December 18th, 2024]
- KERC Approves First Amendment to Multi-Year Transmission, Distribution, and Retail Supply Tariff Regulations 2024 - SolarQuarter - December 18th, 2024 [December 18th, 2024]
- Masked Protests and First Amendment Rights The Chickenman Case in Smyrna - Wgnsradio - December 18th, 2024 [December 18th, 2024]
- First Amendment attorneys say Ohio bill aimed at curbing antisemitism may infringe on rights - 10TV - December 18th, 2024 [December 18th, 2024]
- First Amendment warning: 100% chance of Ryan Walters tweeting - NonDoc - December 18th, 2024 [December 18th, 2024]
- Chris Hayes Says Trump's Media Lawsuits Are Meant to 'Open the Floodgates' to Overturn Key First Amendment Rights | Video - TheWrap - December 18th, 2024 [December 18th, 2024]
- SJC expands First Amendment protection to true threats over the Internet, by text, and in person - The Boston Globe - December 14th, 2024 [December 14th, 2024]
- OPINION: The First Amendment is the Biggest Story of the 2024 Presidential Election - Nevada Globe - December 14th, 2024 [December 14th, 2024]
- First Amendment: Anathema or weapon? - Workers World - December 14th, 2024 [December 14th, 2024]
- Justices Will Hear First Amendment Challenge to Denial of Tax Exemption for Catholic Charities - Law.com - December 14th, 2024 [December 14th, 2024]
- The Press and The People Must Not Willingly Surrender First Amendment Rights to Trump - Daily Kos - December 14th, 2024 [December 14th, 2024]
- La. TikTok creator says potential app ban infringes on First Amendment right - KPLC - December 14th, 2024 [December 14th, 2024]
- Opinion | The TikTok Ruling Is a Blow for the First Amendment and Free Speech - The New York Times - December 10th, 2024 [December 10th, 2024]
- TikTok failed to save itself with the First Amendment - The Verge - December 10th, 2024 [December 10th, 2024]
- Newsoms War on Political Speech: ADF Defends Rumble in the First Amendment Case - California Family Council - December 10th, 2024 [December 10th, 2024]
- Opinion | The TikTok Sale and the First Amendment - The Wall Street Journal - December 8th, 2024 [December 8th, 2024]
- Secret court hearing threatens the First Amendment and more - The Hill - December 8th, 2024 [December 8th, 2024]
- President Trump lacks standing: CBS rubbishes lawsuit over Kamala Harris 60 Minutes interview as procedurally baseless and prohibited by the First... - December 8th, 2024 [December 8th, 2024]
- Perspective: Colorado vs. the First Amendment - Colorado Springs Gazette - December 8th, 2024 [December 8th, 2024]
- Annenberg Classroom Film on First Amendment Wins Anthem Award - The Annenberg Public Policy Center of the University of Pennsylvania - December 8th, 2024 [December 8th, 2024]
- Trumps calls to investigate pollster put First Amendment at risk - Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression - December 8th, 2024 [December 8th, 2024]
- First Amendment Likely Protects Referring Patients for Out-of-State Abortions - Reason - December 8th, 2024 [December 8th, 2024]
- Trumps FBI director pick Kash Patel: A clear and present danger to freedom of the press First Amendment News 449 - Foundation for Individual Rights... - December 8th, 2024 [December 8th, 2024]
- Federal judge tosses First Amendment retaliation claim in Gibbs lawsuit - News From The States - December 8th, 2024 [December 8th, 2024]
- Litigation: First Amendment rights violated by Cabarrus County - The Courier=Times - November 26th, 2024 [November 26th, 2024]
- Lee C. Bollinger on the First Amendment, Free Speech, Affirmative Action, and More - Columbia University - November 26th, 2024 [November 26th, 2024]
- 'Free Speech Was Given to Us by God': Why the First Amendment Is in Danger Like Never Before - CBN.com - November 26th, 2024 [November 26th, 2024]
- The Impact of The First Amendment: Essays on the Imperative of Intellectual Freedom - New Ideal - November 26th, 2024 [November 26th, 2024]
- Journal of Free Speech Law: "The Press Clause: The Forgotten First Amendment," - Reason - November 26th, 2024 [November 26th, 2024]
- Kansas nurse Elaine Gebhardt claims First Amendment protection in state board probe of her social media posts - The Sentinel - November 26th, 2024 [November 26th, 2024]
- Thomas pushed to overrule Kagans order in COVID-related First Amendment case where RFK Jr. serves as co-counsel - Law & Crime - November 26th, 2024 [November 26th, 2024]
- Counterpoint: Reporters shouldnt have more First Amendment rights than the rest of us - TribLIVE - November 26th, 2024 [November 26th, 2024]
- Trump Resumes His Endless War Against the First Amendment - The New Republic - November 26th, 2024 [November 26th, 2024]
- Anti-porn lawyers ready to profit from a Kansas age-gating law that may violate the First Amendment - Kansas City Pitch - November 26th, 2024 [November 26th, 2024]
- Its the First Amendment, stupid. Judge tells Florida to stop threatening TV stations - The Daily News Online - October 21st, 2024 [October 21st, 2024]
- Californias deepfake ban cant fool the deep protections of the First Amendment - The Hill - October 14th, 2024 [October 14th, 2024]
- Florida health department defies First Amendment, threatens to prosecute TV stations for airing abortion rights ad - Foundation for Individual Rights... - October 14th, 2024 [October 14th, 2024]
- Hands Off The ConstitutionNever Mess With The First Amendment - Forbes - October 14th, 2024 [October 14th, 2024]
- TikTok v. Garland Oral Argument: Did TikTok Admit It Doesnt Have First Amendment Rights? - The Federalist Society - October 14th, 2024 [October 14th, 2024]
- Balancing First Amendment Rights and Youth Protection | Age and Access in the Social Media Era - R Street - October 14th, 2024 [October 14th, 2024]
- Are we not all Americans living by our first amendment? - TAPinto.net - October 14th, 2024 [October 14th, 2024]
- 476. Words, Actions, and Liberty: Tara Smith Decodes the First Amendment - Skeptic Magazine - October 14th, 2024 [October 14th, 2024]
- Council approves a nine-day clean zone for the Super Bowl. A First Amendment lawyer says its excessive. - WWNO - October 14th, 2024 [October 14th, 2024]
- Newsoms anti-satire law tries to kill the joke and the First Amendment - The San Diego Union-Tribune - October 14th, 2024 [October 14th, 2024]
- A Sign Of The Times: Bourne Bylaw Change Off STM Warrant Amid First Amendment Concerns - CapeNews.net - October 14th, 2024 [October 14th, 2024]
- Banned Books Week? Try First Amendment Week instead - Thomas B. Fordham Institute - October 7th, 2024 [October 7th, 2024]
- Stephens City mayor addresses heated exchange with First Amendment auditor - Northern Virginia Daily - October 7th, 2024 [October 7th, 2024]
- What the US Supreme Courts next term holds for the First Amendment - Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press - October 7th, 2024 [October 7th, 2024]
- John Kerry Says First Amendment Is Major Block to Stopping Disinformation, Hopes to Implement Change to That - CBN.com - October 7th, 2024 [October 7th, 2024]
- Can AI regulation survive the First Amendment? - Platformer - October 7th, 2024 [October 7th, 2024]