Explosive Revelation of Obama Administration Illegal Surveillance of Americans – National Review
During the Obama years, the National Security Agency intentionally and routinely intercepted and reviewed communications of American citizens in violation of the Constitution and of court-ordered guidelines implemented pursuant to federal law.
The unlawful surveillance appears to have been a massive abuse of the governments foreign-intelligence-collection authority, carried out for the purpose of monitoring the communications of Americans in the United States. While aware that it was going on for an extensive period of time, the administration failed to disclose its unlawful surveillance of Americans until late October 2016, when the administration was winding down and the NSA needed to meet a court deadline in order to renew various surveillance authorities under the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA).
The administrations stonewalling about the scope of the violation induced an exasperated Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court to accuse the NSA of an institutional lack of candor in connection with what the court described as a very serious Fourth Amendment issue. (The court is the federal tribunal created in 1978 by FISA; it is often referred to as a secret court because proceedings before it are classified and ex parte meaning only the Justice Department appears before the court.)
The FISA-court opinion is now public, available here. The unlawful surveillance was first exposed in a report at Circa by John Solomon and Sara Carter, who have also gotten access to internal, classified reports. The story was also covered extensively Wednesday evening by James Rosen and Bret Baier on Fox Newss Special Report.
According to the internal reports reviewed by Solomon and Carter, the illegal surveillance may involve more than 5 percent of NSA searches of databases derived from what is called upstream collection of Internet communications.
As the FISA court explains, upstream collection refers to the interception of communications as they transit the facilities of an Internet backbone carrier. These are the data routes between computer networks. The routes are hosted by government, academic, commercial, and similar high-capacity network centers, and they facilitate the global, international exchange of Internet traffic. Upstream collection from the Internets backbone, which accounts for about 9 percent of the NSAs collection haul (a massive amount of communications), is distinguished from interception of communications from more familiar Internet service providers.
Upstream collection is a vital tool for gathering intelligence against foreign threats to the United States. It is, of course, on foreign intelligence targets non-U.S. persons situated outside the U.S. that the NSA and CIA are supposed to focus. Foreign agents operating inside the U.S. are mainly the purview of the FBI, which conducts surveillance of their communications through warrants from the FISA court individualized warrants based on probable cause that a specific person is acting as an agent of a foreign power.
The NSA conducts vacuum intelligence-collection under a different section of FISA section 702. It is inevitable that these section 702 surveillance authorities will incidentally intercept the communications of Americans inside the United States if those Americans are communicating with the foreign target. This does not raise serious Fourth Amendment concerns; after all, non-targeted Americans are intercepted all the time in traditional criminal wiretaps because they call, or are called by, the target. But FISA surveillance is more controversial than criminal surveillance because the government does not have to show probable cause of a crime and when the targets are foreigners outside the U.S., the government does not have to make any showing; it may target if it has a legitimate foreign-intelligence purpose, which is really not much of a hurdle at all.
So, as noted in coverage of the Obama administrations monitoring of Trump-campaign officials, FISA section 702 provides some privacy protection for Americans: The FISA court orders minimization procedures, which require any incidentally intercepted Americans identity to be masked. That is, the NSA must sanitize the raw data by concealing the identity of the American. Only the masked version of the communication is provided to other U.S. intelligence agencies for purposes of generating reports and analyses. As I have previously explained, however, this system relies on the good faith of government officials in respecting privacy: There are gaping loopholes that permit American identities to be unmasked if, for example, the NSA or some other intelligence official decides doing so is necessary to understand the intelligence value of the communication.
While that kind of incidental collection raises the concerns of privacy advocates, it is a small problem compared to upstream collection, the technology of which poses profound Fourth Amendment challenges.
In a nutshell, it is not possible to capture a single e-mail related to a single target as it transits the backbone routes (or switches) that connect networks. The NSA must instead capture packets of e-mail data which include lots of e-mails beside the targeted e-mail. It sifts through these packets, finds and assembles the components of the email it was looking for, and then discards the rest. (A New York Times report by Charlie Savage earlier this week, in connection with a different FISA issue, provides a good explanation of this process. By contrast, the relevant discussion in the FISA court opinion of multiple communications transactions, or MCTs, is brief and heavily redacted see the opinion at 1516.) Even if the NSA does exactly what it is supposed to do (i.e., sift and discard), this means American communications are being seized and subjected to an inspection however cursory in the absence of any warrant, probable cause, or foreign-intelligence relevance.
Now, couple this problem with the way the NSA targets. The upstream communications it collects end up in databases. When the NSA has a target about whom it seeks intelligence, it runs a search through the databases using what is variously called an identifier, a selection term, or a selector some e-mail address, phone number, or other identifying information related to the target. For years, U.S. intelligence agencies have not just sought any communications to or from this target; they have also sought any communications about this target e.g., when the target merely appears to have been referred to. This means the communications of people, including Americans inside the United States, are far more likely to be accessed and analyzed even though, again, there is no warrant or probable cause, there may be no direct communication with a proper intelligence target, and the Americans communications may be of no foreign-intelligence value.
So, to summarize, we have the communications of Americans inside the United States being incidentally intercepted, stored, sifted through, and in some instances analyzed, even though those Americans are not targets of foreign-intelligence collection. The minimization procedures are supposed to prevent the worst potential abuses, particularly, the pretextual use of foreign-intelligence-collection authority in order to conduct domestic spying. But even when complied with, there is a colorable argument that the minimization procedures do not eliminate the Fourth Amendment problem i.e., they permit seizure and search without adequate cause.
Now we know the minimization procedures have not been complied with. The new scandal involves their flouting.
In 2011, it became clear to the FISA court that the minimization procedures were providing insufficient protection to Americans. Of special concern was the use of identifiers of American citizens as selection terms for database searches. While the activities of these Americans might have made them worthy foreign-intelligence targets, there are other ways to monitor them under FISA. Targeting them for section 702 searches increased the likelihood that wholly domestic communications between Americans would be collected.
Thus, the minimization procedures were ratcheted up. The most significant change, as the FISA court opinion relates, was that the revised procedures categorically prohibited NSA analysts from using U.S.-person identifiers to query the results of upstream Internet collection (emphasis added).
This meant the NSA was not supposed to use an Americans phone number, e-mail address, or other identifier in running searches through its upstream database.
It is this prohibition that the NSA routinely and extensively violated. Evidently, there was widespread use of American identifiers throughout the years after the 2011 revision of the minimization procedures. The violation was so broad that, at the time the Obama administration ended, its scope had still not been determined.
The Trump Justice Department proposed new procedures in late March, which the FISA court has approved. These include the elimination of searches about a target henceforth, searches are limited to communications in which the target is presumptively a participant (i.e., to or from). The new procedures redouble efforts to assure that the database collects only foreign communications (i.e., at least one end of the communication is outside the U.S.).
We should note that section 702 is due to lapse unless reauthorized later this year, so the new rules will obviously be subjected to close scrutiny. A salient question will be whether this new scandal is mainly a case of technology outpacing the capacity to formulate rules that bring its use into constitutional compliance.
Im sure there is a good deal of that going on; that means the system is inadvertently inputting communications that should not be collected and stored. Plainly, though, something more insidious has also gone on. Even if the inputting has been inadvertently flawed, the outputs what is actually accessed from the database and analyzed would be less likely to violate American privacy if the minimization procedures were followed. The rules from 2011 forward were simple: Do not use American identifiers. Yet NSA used them not once or twice because some new technician didnt know better. This violation of law was routine and extensive, known and concealed.
Clearly, this new scandal must be considered in context.
The NSA says it does not share raw upstream collection data with any other intelligence agency. But that data is refined into reports. To the extent the data collected has increased the number of Americans whose activities make it into reports, it has simultaneously increased the opportunities for unmasking American identities. Other reporting indicates that there was a significant uptick in unmasking incidents in the latter years of the Obama administration. More officials were given unmasking authority. At the same time, President Obama loosened restrictions to allow wider access to raw intelligence collection and wider dissemination of intelligence reports.
This geometrically increased the likelihood that classified information would be leaked as did the Obama administrations encouragement to Congress to demand disclosure of intelligence related to the Trump campaign (the purported TrumpRussia connection). And of course, there has been a stunning amount of leaking of classified information to the media.
Enabling of domestic spying, contemptuous disregard of court-ordered minimization procedures (procedures the Obama administration itself proposed, then violated), and unlawful disclosure of classified intelligence to feed a media campaign against political adversaries. Quite the Obama legacy.
Andrew C. McCarthy is a senior policy fellow at the National Review Institute and a contributing editor of National Review.
View original post here:
Explosive Revelation of Obama Administration Illegal Surveillance of Americans - National Review
- Permissibility of Cross-Border Share Swap: Understanding the Fourth Amendment of the NDI Rules and its Implications - SCC Online - November 23rd, 2024 [November 23rd, 2024]
- Does the Fourth Amendment protect smartphone users? - Lewiston Morning Tribune - October 12th, 2024 [October 12th, 2024]
- The Fourth Amendment shouldn't stop once you get up to drone level: Albert Fox Cahn - Fox Business - September 21st, 2024 [September 21st, 2024]
- The Reasonableness of Retaining Personal Property Post-Seizure and the Ascendancy of Text, History, and Tradition in Fourth Amendment Jurisprudence -... - September 21st, 2024 [September 21st, 2024]
- Gujarat's Proposes Fourth Amendment To Net Metering Regulations For Rooftop Solar Systems Up To 100 KW - SolarQuarter - July 26th, 2024 [July 26th, 2024]
- Nearly 96% of Private Property Is Open to Warrantless Searches, New Study Estimates - Reason - March 15th, 2024 [March 15th, 2024]
- Heres what to do (and not do) if you get pulled over in California. What are my rights? - Yahoo Movies Canada - December 12th, 2023 [December 12th, 2023]
- FBI Seized $86 Million From People Not Suspected Crimes. A Federal Court Will Decide if That's Legal. - Reason - December 12th, 2023 [December 12th, 2023]
- Digital justice: Supreme Court increasingly confronts law and the internet - Washington Times - December 12th, 2023 [December 12th, 2023]
- MCHS goes on lockout after weapons found on campus - Mineral County Independent-News - November 19th, 2023 [November 19th, 2023]
- Cops Stormed Into a Seattle Woman's Home. It Was the Wrong ... - Reason - November 19th, 2023 [November 19th, 2023]
- Ron Wyden, U.S. Senator from Oregon The Presidential Prayer ... - The Presidential Prayer Team - November 19th, 2023 [November 19th, 2023]
- Bill Maher Slams Critics of the West Amid Israel Conflict: Marginalized People Live Better Today Because of Western Ideals (Video) - Yahoo... - November 5th, 2023 [November 5th, 2023]
- Surveillance authority change could harm ability to stop attacks, FBI ... - Roll Call - November 5th, 2023 [November 5th, 2023]
- New York's progressive chief judge joins with conservatives to ... - City & State - November 5th, 2023 [November 5th, 2023]
- Should domestic abusers have gun rights? | On Point - WBUR News - November 5th, 2023 [November 5th, 2023]
- The Biden administrations latest executive order calls for a ... - R Street - November 5th, 2023 [November 5th, 2023]
- DPS Presents Purple Hearts, Medal of Valor and Other Prestigious ... - the Texas Department of Public Safety - November 5th, 2023 [November 5th, 2023]
- Senators Katie Britt and John Kennedy Call for Investigation into ... - Calhoun County Journal - October 15th, 2023 [October 15th, 2023]
- Trump and Section 3 of the Fourteenth Amendment: An Exploration ... - JURIST - October 15th, 2023 [October 15th, 2023]
- Expert Q&A with David Aaron on FISA Section 702 Reauthorization ... - Just Security - October 15th, 2023 [October 15th, 2023]
- A Constitution the Government Evades - Tenth Amendment Center - October 15th, 2023 [October 15th, 2023]
- Imagine If Feds Hunted More Real Terrorists, Not Conservatives - The Federalist - October 15th, 2023 [October 15th, 2023]
- Lake Orion Voters Could Decide Removing TIF Funding for ... - Oakland County Times - August 24th, 2023 [August 24th, 2023]
- A marriage of convenience: Why the pushback against a key spy program could cave in on progressives - Yahoo News - August 24th, 2023 [August 24th, 2023]
- Iowa Public Information Board accepts one complaint against ... - KMAland - August 24th, 2023 [August 24th, 2023]
- Burleigh County weighs OHV ordinance to crack down on reckless ... - Bismarck Tribune - August 8th, 2023 [August 8th, 2023]
- AI targets turnstile jumpers to fight fare evasion, but experts warn of ... - 1330 WFIN - August 8th, 2023 [August 8th, 2023]
- As of July 1, police won't be able to stop people for smell of cannabis - The Baltimore Banner - May 20th, 2023 [May 20th, 2023]
- Baby Ninth Amendments Part V: Real Life, Potpourri, and the Big ... - Reason - May 20th, 2023 [May 20th, 2023]
- COA affirms SVF firearm conviction, finds stop and search by police ... - Indiana Lawyer - May 20th, 2023 [May 20th, 2023]
- BARINGS BDC, INC. : Entry into a Material Definitive Agreement, Creation of a Direct Financial Obligation or an Obligation under an Off-Balance Sheet... - May 20th, 2023 [May 20th, 2023]
- Column: : Justice, tyrants and the mob (5/19/23) - McCook Daily Gazette - May 20th, 2023 [May 20th, 2023]
- Alabama appeals court reverses murder conviction of Ala. officer ... - Police News - May 20th, 2023 [May 20th, 2023]
- Oakland narrows town manager search to five | West Orange Times ... - West Orange Times & SouthWest Orange Observer - May 20th, 2023 [May 20th, 2023]
- The Durham Report Is Right About the Need for More FBI Oversight - Reason - May 20th, 2023 [May 20th, 2023]
- Hashtag Trending May 19- U.S. government use invasive AI to track refugees; OpenAI releases iOS ChatGPT app; Microsoft bets on nuclear fusion - IT... - May 20th, 2023 [May 20th, 2023]
- Collective knowledge doctrine applies to a traffic stop - Police News - May 18th, 2023 [May 18th, 2023]
- Privacy and civil rights groups warn against rapidly growing mass ... - TechSpot - May 18th, 2023 [May 18th, 2023]
- There Is No Defensive Search Exception to the Fourth Amendment ... - Center for Democracy and Technology - May 8th, 2023 [May 8th, 2023]
- Napolitano: Does government believe in the Constitution ... - The Winchester Star - May 8th, 2023 [May 8th, 2023]
- Constitution might as well be abandoned if amendments are not ... - Washington Times - May 8th, 2023 [May 8th, 2023]
- One police officer opens a car door, and another looks inside. Did ... - SCOTUSblog - May 8th, 2023 [May 8th, 2023]
- Biden retains option of invoking 14th Amendment to avoid default - Geo News - May 8th, 2023 [May 8th, 2023]
- North Carolina Legislature Pushing Bill That Would Allow Cops To ... - Techdirt - May 8th, 2023 [May 8th, 2023]
- Letter: Threat to our freedom | Opinion | news-journal.com - Longview News-Journal - May 8th, 2023 [May 8th, 2023]
- Parents file lawsuit alleging civil rights violations after children were ... - The Boston Globe - May 8th, 2023 [May 8th, 2023]
- Nevada moves to strengthen protections around use of sexual ... - This Is Reno - May 8th, 2023 [May 8th, 2023]
- Feds rethink warrantless search stats and oh look, a huge drop in numbers - The Register - May 8th, 2023 [May 8th, 2023]
- Its literally cost me everything. Missouri man gets jail time in Capitol riot case - Yahoo News - May 8th, 2023 [May 8th, 2023]
- Board Member Rallies to Student Who Vandalized LGBTQ Posters - FlaglerLive.com - May 8th, 2023 [May 8th, 2023]
- 4th Circuit upholds $730K award to Black Secret Service agent - Virginia Lawyers Weekly - April 19th, 2023 [April 19th, 2023]
- Suspected drug dealer who used alias to rent condo wins reversal in ... - Indiana Lawyer - April 19th, 2023 [April 19th, 2023]
- Do Priests Have a Right to Privacy? - Commonweal - April 19th, 2023 [April 19th, 2023]
- This Deceptive ICE Tactic Violates the Fourth Amendment - ACLU - April 13th, 2023 [April 13th, 2023]
- LDF Appeals Grant of Qualified Immunity in Case Involving Invasive ... - NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund - April 13th, 2023 [April 13th, 2023]
- Livestreaming police stop constitutionally protected - North Carolina Lawyers Weekly - April 13th, 2023 [April 13th, 2023]
- F.B.I. Feared Lawmaker Was Target of Foreign Intelligence Operation - The New York Times - April 13th, 2023 [April 13th, 2023]
- Houston police officer who opened fire in Family Dollar parking lot also shot Mario Watts in separate 2021 incident, HPD confirms - KTRK-TV - April 13th, 2023 [April 13th, 2023]
- Jayland Walker: What's legal and what's illegal during protests - Akron Beacon Journal - April 13th, 2023 [April 13th, 2023]
- IMPD officers indicted for death of Herman Whitfield III - WISH TV Indianapolis, IN - April 13th, 2023 [April 13th, 2023]
- You can support Second Amendment and want gun reform, too ... - Straight Arrow News - April 13th, 2023 [April 13th, 2023]
- Does the five-second rule apply to extending a traffic stop to permit a ... - Police News - April 13th, 2023 [April 13th, 2023]
- Charlotte moves to dismiss lawsuit from man injured during 2020 ... - Carolina Journal - April 13th, 2023 [April 13th, 2023]
- TRAVEL & LEISURE CO. : Entry into a Material Definitive Agreement, Creation of a Direct Financial Obligation or an Obligation under an Off-Balance... - April 11th, 2023 [April 11th, 2023]
- Socialism and the Equal Sharing of Misery | Business ... - The Weekly Journal - April 11th, 2023 [April 11th, 2023]
- Top 10 Court Cases That Changed the U.S. Justice System - Listverse - April 11th, 2023 [April 11th, 2023]
- A new look at the lives of ultra-Orthodox Jews: Shtetl.org provides ... - New York Daily News - April 11th, 2023 [April 11th, 2023]
- VERISK ANALYTICS, INC. : Entry into a Material Definitive Agreement, Creation of a Direct Financial Obligation or an Obligation under an Off-Balance... - April 11th, 2023 [April 11th, 2023]
- Power Of Arrest In India, USA And UK - BW Legal World - April 11th, 2023 [April 11th, 2023]
- Jalil Muntaqim: The time to end prison slavery is now - The Real News Network - April 11th, 2023 [April 11th, 2023]
- Race and the Fourth Amendment: Defendants Raise Issue in ... - Law.com - April 9th, 2023 [April 9th, 2023]
- Why Founding Fathers passed the Third Amendment to the ... - Tennessean - April 9th, 2023 [April 9th, 2023]
- The journey of the Constitution - Pakistan Observer - April 9th, 2023 [April 9th, 2023]
- Former MPD officer sued - McMinnville - Southern Standard - April 9th, 2023 [April 9th, 2023]
- No, the RESTRICT Act wouldnt give the government access to data from your home devices - WCNC.com - April 9th, 2023 [April 9th, 2023]
- Analysis: How Strict Enforcement of Strict Gun Laws Begets ... - The Reload - April 9th, 2023 [April 9th, 2023]
- New York Court Rules Due Process Must be Considered for 'Red ... - National Shooting Sports Foundation - April 9th, 2023 [April 9th, 2023]
- Opinion: Democracy can't exist without "legal technicalities" - The Connecticut Mirror - April 9th, 2023 [April 9th, 2023]
- Commentary: Police and District Attorneys Dont Want to Give Up ... - The Peoples Vanguard of Davis - April 9th, 2023 [April 9th, 2023]