Thirty-fourth Amendment of the Constitution of Ireland …
Thirty-fourth Amendment of the Constitution (Marriage Equality) Act 2015 Location Ireland Date 22May2015(2015-05-22) Results Votes Of total Yes 1,201,607 700162070000000000062.07% No 734,300 700137930000000000037.93% Valid votes 1,935,907 700199290000000000099.29% Invalid or blank votes 13,818 69997100000000000000.71% Total votes 1,949,725 100.00% Voter turnout 700160520000000000060.52% Electorate 3,221,681 Results by constituency How the electorate voted, by constituency. Proportion of the valid poll voting yes:
72.5%75%
70%72.49%
67.5%69.99%
65%67.49%
62.5%64.99%
60%62.49%
57.5%59.99%
55%57.49%
52.5%54.99%
50%52.49%
48.58%
The Thirty-fourth Amendment of the Constitution is an amendment to the Constitution of Ireland, requires the state to provide for same-sex marriage. It was effected by the Thirty-fourth Amendment of the Constitution (Marriage Equality) Act 2015 (previously Bill No. 6 of 2015), which was approved at a referendum on 22 May 2015 by 62% of voters on a turnout of 61%.[1][2] This was the first time a country has legalised same-sex marriage in a nationwide popular vote.[3][4] The bill's signing into law by the President was delayed by two petitions challenging the conduct of the referendum, which were dismissed by the Court of Appeal on 30 July 2015.[5] It was signed into law by the President on 29 August 2015.[6]
The amendment inserted a new section 4 to Article 41 of the Constitution on The Family. In the English text:
4. Marriage may be contracted in accordance with law by two persons without distinction as to their sex.
And in the Irish text:
4. Fadfaidh beirt, gan beann ar a ngnas, conradh psta a dhanamh de rir dl.
The text in Irish and English is intended to have the same meaning; in the event of a conflict, the Irish version takes precedence.[7][8]
The Irish text of the amendment as introduced was:[9]
4. Fadfaidh beirt, cib acu is fir n mn iad, conradh a dhanamh i leith psadh de rir dl.
Journalist Bruce Arnold argued against the bill in two articles in The Irish Times, one of which focused on alleged issues with the Irish text.[7][10] Arnold argued that the Irish text describes only same-sex couples, thus rendering opposite-sex marriage illegal.[7] Government sources pointed out the words impugned by Arnold ("beirt" and "cib acu is fir n mn") are already used with similar intent elsewhere in the constitution.[11] Counterpoints from legal academics were that Arnold's strict constructionist interpretation would be trumped by the doctrine of absurdity, and that failure to mention opposite-sex marriage would not make it illegal.[11] Some argued that the Irish text should nevertheless be changed to remove all doubts.[11] Enda Kenny announced on 10 March 2015 that such a change would be made.[12] Frances Fitzgerald moved the amendment in the Dil the following day.[13]
Katherine Zappone and Ann Louise Gilligan lost a case in the High Court in 2006 for the recognition by Ireland of their Canadian same-sex marriage.[14] The Civil Partnership and Certain Rights and Obligations of Cohabitants Act 2010 instituted civil partnership in Irish law. After the 2011 general election, the Fine Gael and Labour parties formed a coalition government, whose programme included the establishment of a Constitutional Convention to examine potential changes on specified issues, including "Provision for the legalisation of same-sex marriage". The Convention considered the issue in May 2013 and voted to recommend that the state should be required, rather than merely permitted, to allow for same-sex marriage.[15] Its report was formally submitted in July and the government formally responded in December, when Taoiseach Enda Kenny said a referendum would be held "no later than mid-2015".[16] All amendments to the Irish constitution must be approved by the people in a referendum before becoming law.
Some legal academics claimed that extending marriage to same-sex couples did not require a constitutional amendment and could have been accomplished by an ordinary Act of the Oireachtas.[17][18] Then-minister Shatter disagreed in November 2013, stating that there was "ample case law" to the effect that "marriage is understood as being between one man and one woman".[19]
In January 2015, the wording of the proposed amendment was agreed at a special cabinet meeting and published in the press, and the bill was formally introduced in the Dil by the Minister for Justice and Equality, Frances Fitzgerald.[20][21]
A separate Children and Family Relationships Act 2015 was passed in April 2015. This included adoption rights for same-sex couples prior to the passing of the Act, single gay or lesbian people, or one of the partners in a same-sex couple could adopt, but joint adoption by both partners was not possible.[22] The general scheme of this bill was published for consultation in January 2014,[23] and in 2015 it was passed by the Dil on 12 March and the Seanad on 30 March.[24][25] The legislation is yet to come into force.
Simultaneous referendums were held on 22 May 2015, on the marriage bill and another constitutional amendment, to reduce the age of candidacy for the presidency.[26][27] Referendums need a simple majority of the votes cast to pass. A Dil by-election in CarlowKilkenny was held on the same day.[26]
According to the Referendum Commission, if the referendum is passed:[28]
The Thirty-fourth Amendment of the Constitution (Marriage Equality) Bill 2015 was debated in the Dil on 10 and 11 March 2015. Several deputies from different parties spoke in favour. The only speaker to oppose it was independent TD Mattie McGrath; it was passed without a division (i.e., by voice vote). It was then debated in the Seanad on 25 and 27 March. Votes were held on a number of proposed amendments, all of which were defeated, and the Bill was finally passed by 29 votes to three. Among those speaking in favour was Katherine Zappone, now a Senator. Those who voted against were Senators Rnn Mullen, Jim Walsh and Feargal Quinn; the opposition amendments were also supported by Senator Fidelma Healy Eames.[30]
All four main parties in the Dil support the bill: the governing Fine Gael and Labour, and the opposition Fianna Fil and Sinn Fin. Members of the Green Party, Anti-Austerity Alliance, People Before Profit Alliance and independents are also on record in support of the amendment.[31] "Yes Equality" is an umbrella campaign by Gay and Lesbian Equality Network (GLEN), the Irish Council for Civil Liberties and Marriage Equality.[32]
Religious bodies in Ireland officially adopted stances that were either neutral or opposed to the referendum. The Irish Catholic Bishops' Conference is opposed to same-sex marriage, and has distributed a booklet to all parishes.[33][34] In February 2015, the Methodist Church in Ireland issued a statement supporting the traditional view of marriage as being between a man and woman.[35] In April 2015, a cross-denominational group issued a leaflet urging a No vote. Two bishops (one Roman Catholic and one Church of Ireland), and ministers and lay members of the Methodist, Presbyterian various Pentecostal churches signed and distributed the leaflet.[36] On 22 April 2015, the leaders of the Presbyterian Church in Ireland issued a statement advocating a no vote, saying "the change proposed in the same-sex marriage referendum denies the rights of children and the natural responsibilities of a father and a mother in nurturing them".[37] The Iona Institute, a mainly-Catholic religious think tank, also opposed the amendment.[38]
However, in February 2015, the Church of Ireland announced that it was not taking a stance on the referendum, but was urging its members to vote according to their conscience.[39][40] Two Church of Ireland bishops called for a Yes vote. Similarly, the Islamic Centre in Ireland issued a statement on 17 April stating that "As Muslims we must believe in equality and inclusiveness. People should not be discriminated for any reason. It is important to humanise people and not to de humanise. The Islamic tradition teaches to hate the sin but not the sinner. The attitude of some Muslims towards homosexuals is incompatible with the spirit of mercy and kindness in Islam. The Irish constitution guarantees all Irish citizens the freedom of conscience and Muslims must exercise this right when voting on 22nd May 2015."[41]
A petition initiated by a number of religious groups including the Islamic Cultural Centre of Ireland, the Irish Council of Imams, and the Galway branch of the Reformed Presbyterian Church on 15 April called for a "conscience clause", which would allow individuals and businesses to discriminate against same-sex couples in the provision of goods and services. In response, Taoiseach Enda Kenny said: "The Government has made its decision very clear here in respect to the question that the people will be asked on the 22nd of May. That question of course is to give their approval, if they see fit and I hope they do, to allow for marriage in civil law irrespective of sexual orientation." Brendan Howlin said "The one issue at the core of this referendum is equality under the Constitution and anything else is extraneous."[42]
However, some religious-affiliated groups were in favour of the referendum. In January 2015, the Church of Ireland LGBT group Changing Attitude Ireland welcomed the publication of the wording of the Marriage Equality Referendum. Dr Richard OLeary, the organisation's chair, said that marriage should be "available to couples without distinction as to their sex", just as civil marriage "may be contracted by two persons without distinction as to their race or religion".[39] On 7 May, at a Changing Attitude Ireland event, former Archdeacon of Dublin, Gordon Linney said "We are being given an opportunity on May 22 finally to show the gay community that we value them for who they are. We welcome them as they are fully into society and so give them the recognition they are entitled to and that those who are in stable relationships and wish to marry should be allowed to do so. Marriage is a civil contract. No church will be forced to solemnise any union it does not approve of."[43]
Many business groups advocated for the passing of the referendum. On 16 April, Business for Yes Equality launched, with high-profile companies such as Twitter, eBay, Paypal and 150 Irish-based international and local companies joining.[44][45] Stephen McIntyre, MD of Twitter in Ireland, said "As I see it, this case has three key elements. First, people perform better in the long run when they can be themselves. Second, talent is attracted to organisations which demonstrate an appreciation for diversity, inclusiveness and equality. Finally, Irelands international reputation as a good place to do business will be enhanced by a Yes vote."[46] Martin Shanahan, the head of IDA Ireland, the Industrial Development Authority, called for a Yes vote on 1 May, saying "A Yes vote on May 22 would tell the business world that Ireland is open, inclusive and welcomes diversity and that would be a very positive message to be sending internationally."[47] He also said he believed that a No vote would send a negative signal to international businesses.[48]
Also on 1 May, the Irish Congress of Trade Unions announced its support for the Yes campaign with the launch of its "Trade unions for civil marriage equality" campaign.[49] Other trade unions and staff representative associations supporting a Yes vote include the Garda Representative Association, Mandate, and Ireland's largest trade union, SIPTU.[50][51][52]
On 7 May, eBay CEO John Donahoe announced that the company was backing a Yes vote. Donahoe said that its position on equality issues such as same-sex marriage, in addition to being "the right thing to do", also helps the company attract, retain and develop the right people.[53]
Other prominent groups to support the referendum included a coalition of Ireland's main children's charities called "BeLonG To Yes". Constituent organisations include the ISPCC, Barnardo's, Forige, Youth Work Ireland, the Migrant Rights Centre, Headstrong, Yes Equality, the Children's Rights Alliance, Pavee Point, EPIC and the National Youth Council of Ireland. Speaking at the launch, Fergus Finlay said they had come together to call for a Yes vote in part because groups within the No campaign were "using children as pawns" and that every time he saw a poster calling for a No vote because "every child deserves a mother and father", he saw "a sickening insult to the thousands of lone parents and children who love and care for each other in Ireland. The message is exploitative, hurtful and dishonest. What every child deserves is love, respect, safety. That can come from two parents of either sex, two parents of the same-sex, or a single parent."[54][55] The Union of Students in Ireland launched its "Students for Marriage Equality" campaign in January together with its dedicated website, voteforlove.ie.[56]
Amnesty International launched their 'Lets Make History'[57] campaign for marriage equality on 22 March 2015 to thousands of people outside the historic General Post Office, Dublin.[58] Speakers included Colm O'Gorman, Pat Carey, Sabina Brennan, Gavin Brennan and Grace Dyas.
On 5 May, the "Yes for Health" campaign was launched by Liam Doran, general secretary of the Irish Nurses and Midwives Organisation and Kieran Ryan, CEO of the Irish College of General Practitioners. Speaking at the launch, Minister for Health Leo Varadkar said that a No vote would be a "big step backwards" for the country, and that it would have an adverse effect on the mental health of members of the LGBT community.[59] The following day, the National Women's Council of Ireland and launched their 'Yes' campaign. The launch was attended by representatives of various groups, including the Irish Feminist Network, Digi Women and the Association of Childcare Professionals.[60] On 7 May, the Law Society of Ireland announced its support for a Yes vote. Ken Murphy, the society's Director General, said that the society was taking a public stance because marriage equality was an issue of fundamental human rights. The decision followed a report from the society's human rights committee, which found that there there were 160 ways in which civil partnership, compared to civil marriage, was the lesser of the two unions.[61]
Some groups were also formed in opposition to the referendum. On 18 April, Mothers and Fathers Matter, formed in 2014 to oppose the Children and Family Relationships Bill, launched its No campaign.[62][63] First Families First, a group of three people headed by children's and disabilities campaigner Kathy Sinnott, and fathers rights campaigner John Waters launched its campaign for a No vote on 1 May.[64] On 7 May, a new group called StandUp4Marriage launched. Its founder, Senator Jim Walsh said the launch was sparsely attended because people who want to vote no are afraid to speak out.[43]
The following organisations registered as "approved bodies" to monitor postal voting and vote counting: Comhar Crosta, Marriage Equality, Yes Equality Cork, Green Party, Mothers & Fathers Matter, Fianna Fil, Labour Party, BeLonG to Youth Services, Irish Council for Civil Liberties, GLEN Campaign for Marriage, National LGBT Federation, Sinn Fin, and Fine Gael.[65][66][67]
A 2014 poll showed that support was strongest among younger voters, and that Sinn Fin and Labour voters were somewhat more in favour than Fine Gael and Fianna Fil.[84][78][82]
Counting began at 09:00 IST on 23 May (08:00 UTC). Early tallies quickly began to indicate a victory for the Yes campaign, with Minister for State Aodhn Rordin declaring a "landslide" victory across Dublin only 8 minutes into counting.[88] Key figures in the No campaign, including David Quinn began conceeding defeat as early as 10:00, long ahead of any constituencies declaring their final count.[89]
Urban regions generally recorded higher approval ratings for the change. The highest Yes percentages were recorded in the Dublin Region with the all of the top ten by Yes vote percentage being in the region (with a total yes vote of 71% for the region), and all of the top 15 located in the Greater Dublin Area. Cork's urban constituencies also ranked above the national average, as did Limerick city. Although the Donegal constituencies had been expected to return a No vote,[90] and indeed, of all constituencies reporting a majority Yes vote, the lowest margin was recorded in Donegal South-West where a Yes vote was carried by a margin of only 33 votes Roscommon-South Leitrim was the only constituency to return a majority No vote.
The national results were as follows:[1][91]
72.5%75%
70%72.49%
67.5%69.99%
65%67.49%
62.5%64.99%
60%62.49%
57.5%59.99%
55%57.49%
52.5%54.99%
50%52.49%
48.58%
Dublin Castle, where the result of referendum was officially announced, was opened to the public for the duration of the count, with numbers limited to 2,000 at any one time. A carnival atmosphere prevailed all day after early count tallies indicated that the result would be a Yes. Celebrations and street parties took place at many venues in cities around Ireland, with Dublin celebrations centred between gay venues Pantibar and The George, and Dublin Castle.[93]
Taoiseach Enda Kenny said "With today's Yes vote we have disclosed who we are a generous, compassionate, bold and joyful people. The referendum was about inclusiveness and equality, about love and commitment being enshrined in the constitution. The people have spoken. They have said yes. Ireland thank you."[94]
Tnaiste Joan Burton described Ireland as a "rainbow nation" and said "In Ireland, we are known as a nation of storytellers and today, the people have told quite some story. Together, the people of Ireland have struck a massive blow against discrimination as we extend the right of marriage to all our citizens." Leo Varadkar, Minister for Health and Ireland's first openly gay cabinet minister, said "It is a historic day for Ireland. We are the first country in the world to enshrine marriage equality in our constitution and to do it through popular mandate. That makes us a beacon of equality and liberty to the rest of the world, so it's a very proud day for the Irish people."[94]
Michel Martin, Fianna Fil leader and Leader of the Opposition (but a supporter of the Yes side, like almost all the Government and Opposition deputies in Dil ireann), said "there is something in the DNA of Irish people that reacts to inequality", adding "It is something that Irish people do not accept historically and I believe this ballot is a vote in favour of a more inclusive, equal and just society."[95] However, Senator Averil Power resigned from Fianna Fil after the referendum, alleging that many of its TDs and Senators had refused to canvass or leaflet for a Yes vote, and that its low profile in the Yes campaign was "cynical and cowardly".[96][97]
The leader of Sinn Fin, Gerry Adams, said "We have a new era of equality and that is a good day for Ireland."[94]
Veteran gay and civil rights campaigner, Senator David Norris, who was one of the key figures in having homosexuality decriminalised, said "I think it's wonderful. It's a little bit late for me. As I said the other day, Ive spent so much time pushing the boat out that I forgot to jump on and now it's out beyond the harbour on the high seas, but it's very nice to look at."[98]
Katherine Zappone, the first openly lesbian member of the Oireachtas, proposed remarrying her wife on air.[99]
Diarmuid Martin, the Roman Catholic Archbishop of Dublin told RT that the church needed a "reality check." He said "I appreciate how gay and lesbian men and women feel on this day. That they feel this is something that is enriching the way they live. I think it is a social revolution." He added "I ask myself, most of these young people who voted yes are products of our Catholic school system for 12 years. I'm saying there's a big challenge there to see how we get across the message of the Church"[100]
The Church of Ireland issued a statement indicating that it "defines marriage as between a man and a woman, and the result of this referendum does not alter this." The Archbishops and bishops also called for "a spirit of public generosity, both from those for whom the result of the referendum represents triumph, and from those for whom it signifies disaster"[101][102]
The Presbyterian Church in Ireland said it was "deeply disappointed and saddened that the Constitution will no longer reflect the historic and Christian view of marriage that it is exclusively between one man and one woman."[103]
Under the Referendum Act 1994, the returning officer issued a provisional certificate of the referendum result to the Master of the High Court and published a notice in Iris Oifigiil, the official gazette.[1][119][120] Citizens have seven days in which to lodge a petition challenging the result.[121][120] If no petition is upheld, the provisional certificate is certified as final by the Master of the High Court and the bill is sent to the President of Ireland to be signed into law, thereby amending the constitution.[122][120] After petitions against the referendum had been heard in the High Court and the Court of Appeal, it was signed into law by the President on 29 August 2015.[6][123]
Two separate petitions were lodged within the time limit and considered in the High Court on 5 June 2015.[124] The petitioners, Gerry Walshe and Maurice J. Lyons, were lay litigants.[125] Walsh argued that political parties receiving state funding should have been prohibited from campaigning; that copies of the amendment should have been available at post offices; and that the secrecy of the ballot was compromised by serial numbers on ballot papers and CCTV cameras in some polling stations.[125] Lyons argued that the amendment is too vaguely worded and incompatible with the constitution's Christian ethos and reference to "woman ... in the home"; and also that non-voters should have been counted as no-voters.[126]Nicholas Kearns, President of the High Court, dismissed both applications and awarded costs against the petitioners.[127][126] Walshe and Lyons appealed the decisions, and on 29 June the Court of Appeal scheduled hearings for 30 July.[128][129][130][131] On 30 July the court upheld the dismissals and the costs awards against both petitioners.[5] Both men appealed to the Supreme Court on 27 August, although this did not prevent the President signing the amendment into law on 29 August.[123]
In March 2015, the Department of Justice published the general scheme of the Marriage Bill 2015, setting out the changes to be made to marriage law if the proposed amendment is enacted. These include removing the current legislative bar on same-sex couples marrying,[132] allowing foreign same-sex marriages to be registered in Ireland as marriages rather than as civil partnerships,[133] and dissolving a civil partnership if the partners marry each other.[134] Authorised solemnisers of marriage from religious groups would be allowed to refuse to officiate at same-sex ceremonies.[135][136] Lawyer Benedict Floinn felt the bill's drafting should have been completed before the referendum, to minimise the lacuna during which statute law is out of step with the constitution.[137] The Gender Recognition Act 2015 requires a transgender person to be unmarried to recognise a change of legal sex;[138] the Marriage Bill intends to remove this restriction.[139][140]
The government hoped to have the Marriage Bill enacted before the Oireachtas' summer adjournment, but the referendum petition hearings in the Court of Appeal delayed this.[128][129][141] The bill provides that applications for civil partnership pending when it comes into force can be converted into applications for marriage.[142] The government intends to enact the Marriage Bill "as early as possible" after the Dil's resumption on 22 September 2015.
Visit link:
Thirty-fourth Amendment of the Constitution of Ireland ...
- Permissibility of Cross-Border Share Swap: Understanding the Fourth Amendment of the NDI Rules and its Implications - SCC Online - November 23rd, 2024 [November 23rd, 2024]
- Does the Fourth Amendment protect smartphone users? - Lewiston Morning Tribune - October 12th, 2024 [October 12th, 2024]
- The Fourth Amendment shouldn't stop once you get up to drone level: Albert Fox Cahn - Fox Business - September 21st, 2024 [September 21st, 2024]
- The Reasonableness of Retaining Personal Property Post-Seizure and the Ascendancy of Text, History, and Tradition in Fourth Amendment Jurisprudence -... - September 21st, 2024 [September 21st, 2024]
- Gujarat's Proposes Fourth Amendment To Net Metering Regulations For Rooftop Solar Systems Up To 100 KW - SolarQuarter - July 26th, 2024 [July 26th, 2024]
- Nearly 96% of Private Property Is Open to Warrantless Searches, New Study Estimates - Reason - March 15th, 2024 [March 15th, 2024]
- Heres what to do (and not do) if you get pulled over in California. What are my rights? - Yahoo Movies Canada - December 12th, 2023 [December 12th, 2023]
- FBI Seized $86 Million From People Not Suspected Crimes. A Federal Court Will Decide if That's Legal. - Reason - December 12th, 2023 [December 12th, 2023]
- Digital justice: Supreme Court increasingly confronts law and the internet - Washington Times - December 12th, 2023 [December 12th, 2023]
- MCHS goes on lockout after weapons found on campus - Mineral County Independent-News - November 19th, 2023 [November 19th, 2023]
- Cops Stormed Into a Seattle Woman's Home. It Was the Wrong ... - Reason - November 19th, 2023 [November 19th, 2023]
- Ron Wyden, U.S. Senator from Oregon The Presidential Prayer ... - The Presidential Prayer Team - November 19th, 2023 [November 19th, 2023]
- Bill Maher Slams Critics of the West Amid Israel Conflict: Marginalized People Live Better Today Because of Western Ideals (Video) - Yahoo... - November 5th, 2023 [November 5th, 2023]
- Surveillance authority change could harm ability to stop attacks, FBI ... - Roll Call - November 5th, 2023 [November 5th, 2023]
- New York's progressive chief judge joins with conservatives to ... - City & State - November 5th, 2023 [November 5th, 2023]
- Should domestic abusers have gun rights? | On Point - WBUR News - November 5th, 2023 [November 5th, 2023]
- The Biden administrations latest executive order calls for a ... - R Street - November 5th, 2023 [November 5th, 2023]
- DPS Presents Purple Hearts, Medal of Valor and Other Prestigious ... - the Texas Department of Public Safety - November 5th, 2023 [November 5th, 2023]
- Senators Katie Britt and John Kennedy Call for Investigation into ... - Calhoun County Journal - October 15th, 2023 [October 15th, 2023]
- Trump and Section 3 of the Fourteenth Amendment: An Exploration ... - JURIST - October 15th, 2023 [October 15th, 2023]
- Expert Q&A with David Aaron on FISA Section 702 Reauthorization ... - Just Security - October 15th, 2023 [October 15th, 2023]
- A Constitution the Government Evades - Tenth Amendment Center - October 15th, 2023 [October 15th, 2023]
- Imagine If Feds Hunted More Real Terrorists, Not Conservatives - The Federalist - October 15th, 2023 [October 15th, 2023]
- Lake Orion Voters Could Decide Removing TIF Funding for ... - Oakland County Times - August 24th, 2023 [August 24th, 2023]
- A marriage of convenience: Why the pushback against a key spy program could cave in on progressives - Yahoo News - August 24th, 2023 [August 24th, 2023]
- Iowa Public Information Board accepts one complaint against ... - KMAland - August 24th, 2023 [August 24th, 2023]
- Burleigh County weighs OHV ordinance to crack down on reckless ... - Bismarck Tribune - August 8th, 2023 [August 8th, 2023]
- AI targets turnstile jumpers to fight fare evasion, but experts warn of ... - 1330 WFIN - August 8th, 2023 [August 8th, 2023]
- As of July 1, police won't be able to stop people for smell of cannabis - The Baltimore Banner - May 20th, 2023 [May 20th, 2023]
- Baby Ninth Amendments Part V: Real Life, Potpourri, and the Big ... - Reason - May 20th, 2023 [May 20th, 2023]
- COA affirms SVF firearm conviction, finds stop and search by police ... - Indiana Lawyer - May 20th, 2023 [May 20th, 2023]
- BARINGS BDC, INC. : Entry into a Material Definitive Agreement, Creation of a Direct Financial Obligation or an Obligation under an Off-Balance Sheet... - May 20th, 2023 [May 20th, 2023]
- Column: : Justice, tyrants and the mob (5/19/23) - McCook Daily Gazette - May 20th, 2023 [May 20th, 2023]
- Alabama appeals court reverses murder conviction of Ala. officer ... - Police News - May 20th, 2023 [May 20th, 2023]
- Oakland narrows town manager search to five | West Orange Times ... - West Orange Times & SouthWest Orange Observer - May 20th, 2023 [May 20th, 2023]
- The Durham Report Is Right About the Need for More FBI Oversight - Reason - May 20th, 2023 [May 20th, 2023]
- Hashtag Trending May 19- U.S. government use invasive AI to track refugees; OpenAI releases iOS ChatGPT app; Microsoft bets on nuclear fusion - IT... - May 20th, 2023 [May 20th, 2023]
- Collective knowledge doctrine applies to a traffic stop - Police News - May 18th, 2023 [May 18th, 2023]
- Privacy and civil rights groups warn against rapidly growing mass ... - TechSpot - May 18th, 2023 [May 18th, 2023]
- There Is No Defensive Search Exception to the Fourth Amendment ... - Center for Democracy and Technology - May 8th, 2023 [May 8th, 2023]
- Napolitano: Does government believe in the Constitution ... - The Winchester Star - May 8th, 2023 [May 8th, 2023]
- Constitution might as well be abandoned if amendments are not ... - Washington Times - May 8th, 2023 [May 8th, 2023]
- One police officer opens a car door, and another looks inside. Did ... - SCOTUSblog - May 8th, 2023 [May 8th, 2023]
- Biden retains option of invoking 14th Amendment to avoid default - Geo News - May 8th, 2023 [May 8th, 2023]
- North Carolina Legislature Pushing Bill That Would Allow Cops To ... - Techdirt - May 8th, 2023 [May 8th, 2023]
- Letter: Threat to our freedom | Opinion | news-journal.com - Longview News-Journal - May 8th, 2023 [May 8th, 2023]
- Parents file lawsuit alleging civil rights violations after children were ... - The Boston Globe - May 8th, 2023 [May 8th, 2023]
- Nevada moves to strengthen protections around use of sexual ... - This Is Reno - May 8th, 2023 [May 8th, 2023]
- Feds rethink warrantless search stats and oh look, a huge drop in numbers - The Register - May 8th, 2023 [May 8th, 2023]
- Its literally cost me everything. Missouri man gets jail time in Capitol riot case - Yahoo News - May 8th, 2023 [May 8th, 2023]
- Board Member Rallies to Student Who Vandalized LGBTQ Posters - FlaglerLive.com - May 8th, 2023 [May 8th, 2023]
- 4th Circuit upholds $730K award to Black Secret Service agent - Virginia Lawyers Weekly - April 19th, 2023 [April 19th, 2023]
- Suspected drug dealer who used alias to rent condo wins reversal in ... - Indiana Lawyer - April 19th, 2023 [April 19th, 2023]
- Do Priests Have a Right to Privacy? - Commonweal - April 19th, 2023 [April 19th, 2023]
- This Deceptive ICE Tactic Violates the Fourth Amendment - ACLU - April 13th, 2023 [April 13th, 2023]
- LDF Appeals Grant of Qualified Immunity in Case Involving Invasive ... - NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund - April 13th, 2023 [April 13th, 2023]
- Livestreaming police stop constitutionally protected - North Carolina Lawyers Weekly - April 13th, 2023 [April 13th, 2023]
- F.B.I. Feared Lawmaker Was Target of Foreign Intelligence Operation - The New York Times - April 13th, 2023 [April 13th, 2023]
- Houston police officer who opened fire in Family Dollar parking lot also shot Mario Watts in separate 2021 incident, HPD confirms - KTRK-TV - April 13th, 2023 [April 13th, 2023]
- Jayland Walker: What's legal and what's illegal during protests - Akron Beacon Journal - April 13th, 2023 [April 13th, 2023]
- IMPD officers indicted for death of Herman Whitfield III - WISH TV Indianapolis, IN - April 13th, 2023 [April 13th, 2023]
- You can support Second Amendment and want gun reform, too ... - Straight Arrow News - April 13th, 2023 [April 13th, 2023]
- Does the five-second rule apply to extending a traffic stop to permit a ... - Police News - April 13th, 2023 [April 13th, 2023]
- Charlotte moves to dismiss lawsuit from man injured during 2020 ... - Carolina Journal - April 13th, 2023 [April 13th, 2023]
- TRAVEL & LEISURE CO. : Entry into a Material Definitive Agreement, Creation of a Direct Financial Obligation or an Obligation under an Off-Balance... - April 11th, 2023 [April 11th, 2023]
- Socialism and the Equal Sharing of Misery | Business ... - The Weekly Journal - April 11th, 2023 [April 11th, 2023]
- Top 10 Court Cases That Changed the U.S. Justice System - Listverse - April 11th, 2023 [April 11th, 2023]
- A new look at the lives of ultra-Orthodox Jews: Shtetl.org provides ... - New York Daily News - April 11th, 2023 [April 11th, 2023]
- VERISK ANALYTICS, INC. : Entry into a Material Definitive Agreement, Creation of a Direct Financial Obligation or an Obligation under an Off-Balance... - April 11th, 2023 [April 11th, 2023]
- Power Of Arrest In India, USA And UK - BW Legal World - April 11th, 2023 [April 11th, 2023]
- Jalil Muntaqim: The time to end prison slavery is now - The Real News Network - April 11th, 2023 [April 11th, 2023]
- Race and the Fourth Amendment: Defendants Raise Issue in ... - Law.com - April 9th, 2023 [April 9th, 2023]
- Why Founding Fathers passed the Third Amendment to the ... - Tennessean - April 9th, 2023 [April 9th, 2023]
- The journey of the Constitution - Pakistan Observer - April 9th, 2023 [April 9th, 2023]
- Former MPD officer sued - McMinnville - Southern Standard - April 9th, 2023 [April 9th, 2023]
- No, the RESTRICT Act wouldnt give the government access to data from your home devices - WCNC.com - April 9th, 2023 [April 9th, 2023]
- Analysis: How Strict Enforcement of Strict Gun Laws Begets ... - The Reload - April 9th, 2023 [April 9th, 2023]
- New York Court Rules Due Process Must be Considered for 'Red ... - National Shooting Sports Foundation - April 9th, 2023 [April 9th, 2023]
- Opinion: Democracy can't exist without "legal technicalities" - The Connecticut Mirror - April 9th, 2023 [April 9th, 2023]
- Commentary: Police and District Attorneys Dont Want to Give Up ... - The Peoples Vanguard of Davis - April 9th, 2023 [April 9th, 2023]