Case involving officers who tased mentally ill man to death goes to Georgia Supreme Court – The Atlanta Voice

On a blisteringly hot day in July2017, Helen Gilbert called 911 in Washington County, halfway between Macon and Augusta. She was worried about her brother, Eurie Martin.

Im concerned about him being out in all that weather, Gilbert told a 911 dispatcher. She sounds near tears.

Now where hes going to, I have no clue, Gilbert said.

It turns out Martin was on a 30-mile walk from Milledgeville to Sandersville.

Gilbert told the dispatcher Martin had a history of mental illness and was well past 50 years old. She wanted someone to find him and help him.

But unbeknownst to Gilbert, she called too late. Several minutes earlier, someone else had already called the authorities about Martin, and that call had led to his death.

Case Tests Law Enforcement Use Of Stand Your Ground

The legal path following Martins death has led to a hearing before the Georgia Supreme Court, a hearing that could have important implications for how police officers are held accountable when they kill while on the job. At issue is how Georgias stand your ground law applies to law enforcement.

Martins thirst in the over 90-degree heat had caused him to stop on the outskirts of the town of Deepstep, which bills itself as The Heart of Kaolin at the city limits in honor of the clay mining industry that sustains a handful of east Georgia communities.

There, Cyrus Harris was cutting grass in front of his home, across the road from a chalk white and red kaolin pit, when Martin asked to fill the Coke can hed cut in half to use as a cup with water from Harris spigot.

He just walked right up in my yard. I dont see no car, I dont see nothin, Harris told a 911 dispatcher.

I told him to get out, Harris said.

Harris knew nothing about Martins history of mental illness. All he knew, he said, was that he was afraid for his wifes safety and that the thirsty Black man in his yard was filthy. Because of that call, when Washington County sheriffdeputies arrived, they were looking for a suspicious person.They apparently had no knowledge of Martins mental illness, either.

In Martins case, though, murder charges were brought immediately. The deputies were also fired shortly after the killing forviolating several department procedures.

The first indictment was tossed on a technicality. In the second, the defense argued in a pretrial hearing the deputies should be immune from prosecution.In late 2019, a Superior Court judge granted that immunity.

This immunity that theyre talking about here is immunity from criminal prosecution based on the fact that you were justifiably acting in self-defense, said Jim Fleissner, professor atMercer University School of Law and an expert in the 4th Amendment.

Its not unlike the law in Florida that they call the Stand Your Ground law, Fleissner said.

Fleissner said over the last 20 or so years, officers asking for immunity under stand your ground laws has become a kind of trend. Stand your ground lawsallowthe use of deadly force without an individual needing to retreat from the situation.It was under Floridas stand your ground law that George Zimmerman was acquitted in the shooting death of Trayvon Martin.

Prosecutor: You Cant Be The Aggressor And Claim Stand Your Ground

Heyward Altman is the Middle Georgia Judicial District Attorney who presented the case against the deputies who tased Martin to deathto both grand juries. He will challenge the immunity ruling in the Georgia Supreme Court.

Altman said a stand your ground defense ultimately rests on who started the fight.

You cannot be the initial aggressor, Altman said. If you bring the fight to somebody, you cant later complain that person fought back.

In his ruling, Judge H. Gibbs FlandersJr. notes Martin neverdisplayed overt aggression, even though he was clearly agitated and tense.However, Flanderssaid under Georgias stand your ground law,and because of Martins non-compliance with officers who suspectedhim of themisdemeanors of loitering and walking in a public roadway, the use of force was justified.

Altman said because the deputies initiated the violence, the ruling could carve out special protections for law enforcement to understand your ground.

What were saying is the court expanded that to include an officer and his use of force in making an arrest, Altman said.It expands the statute beyond what it was originally intended to be.

Civil rights activist and attorney Francys Johnson represents Martins family. He said Georgia has a lot riding on the immunity appeal.

We stand to gain everything when it comes to whether the value of a Black life is truly respected in the law and in Georgia, Johnson said.

Already Martins death has changed the way the Georgia law officers are trained to use Tasers. Johnson said he hopes the case leads to bigger changes in how police are trained.

Train them to preserve life, he said.

In addition to the Georgia Supreme Court hearing on immunity for the three former deputies, some state legislators have begun considering changes to Georgias stand your ground law, especially in wake of the Ahmaud Arbery killing earlier this year near Brunswick.

Here is the original post:
Case involving officers who tased mentally ill man to death goes to Georgia Supreme Court - The Atlanta Voice

Related Posts

Comments are closed.