Mediaboss Marketing

Image licensed via Adobe Stock.

C. S. Lewiss 1946 science fiction novelThat Hideous Strengthis almost eighty years old now. Written during the throes of World War II, the novel is the culmination of Lewiss cosmic trilogy, preceded byOut of the Silent PlanetandPerelandra. There are hosts of other articles attending to the prescience of Lewiss terrifying novel, and for good reason;That Hideous Strengthis a warning against using technology to dehumanize people and ultimately cripple the world into submission. Its a great book as a novel, but it seems especially appropriate to revisit in lieu of the growing interest in transhumanism and the rapidacceleration of AI development.

It feels like much of the talk on AI in recent months involves its surface-level manifestations or consequences. It might take away jobs in journalism and help college kids cheat on exams. These are real concerns. The other dangers involvingAI scams, disinformation, and deepfakes are formidable, too. And yet a novel likeThe Hideous Strengthshows the danger behind the danger: the temptation to reject being merely human.

The novelists protagonist, Mark Studdock, must decide whether hell opt into a scheme to destroy humanity via machine intelligence. Mark, a sociologist in training, gets caught up in a secret society known as N.I.C.E., which stands for theNational Institute for Coordinated Experiments. N.I.C.E. is the perfect symbol of todays benevolent-sounding yet bloated and banal administrative state, carrying out power initiatives that impact everyday people. While its unclear exactly what the overall goals of the Institute are, one thing is clear: its time to throw off the limits of being human and transcend into the world of pure intelligence.

Mark Studdock and his wife, Jane, both have a lot to learn in the book. Mark is eager to find acceptance among elites at N.I.C.E., while Jane, who is a lapsed academic struggling to finish her dissertation onJohn Donne, longs for a kind of freedom and independence that her married life fails to afford her. Through their own journeys, both learn that accepting their limits and choosing to commit to each other is the real path to freedom. In the end, domestic family life, which includes birth, growth, and death, is envisioned as a kind of antidote to the mad quest for human immortality and domination.

Okay, so that was 1946. Its 2023. OpenAI, ChatGPT, Altos Labs, bio-longevity; is any of that relevant to C. S. Lewiss great book?Paul Kingsnorththinks so. Kingsnorth writes often on the state of our tech-intoxicated culture. He doesnt own a smartphone. He apologetically writes on Substack while decrying all the bad things the Internet has done to us. But, his voice is among the few out there pointing out how merging ourselves with the Machine will compromise our humanity. In a recent piece, The Abbey of Misrule, Kingsnorth asks what we gain by developing these new AI tools. He writes,

Nearly sixty years back, the cultural theoristMarshall McLuhanoffered a theory of technology which hinted at an answer. He saw each new invention as an extension of an existing human capability. In this understanding, a club extends what we can do with our fist, and a wheel extends what we can do with our legs. Some technologies then extend the capacity of previous ones: a hand loom is replaced by a steam loom; a horse and cart is replaced by a motor car, and so on.

What human capacity, then, is digital technology extending? The answer,saidMcLuhan, was our very consciousness itself.

While technologies made life more convenient, faster, or efficient, artificial intelligence is about extending human consciousness. Do we want that? What would that mean to our ability to think, understand, and reason on our own? Beyond that, AI at its worst will be a kind of divinity, a man-made God. At least, thats what our friends over in the transhumanist camp would like. Kingsnorth continues,

Transhumanist Martine Rothblattsaysthat by building AI systems we are making God. Transhumanist Elise Bohansayswe are building God. Kevin Kellybelievesthat we can see more of God in a cell phone than in a tree frog. Does God exist? asks transhumanist and Google maven Ray Kurzweil. I would say, Not yet. These people are doing more than trying to steal fire from the gods. They are trying to steal the gods themselves or to build their own versions.

For the last two years, I have found myself writing a lot here about God; more than I had intended. I have claimed several times thatthere is a throne at the heart of every culture,and that someone is always going to sit on it. Humans are fundamentally religious animals. We are drawn towards transcendence whether we like it or not. But here in the West, we have dethroned our old god, and now we can barely look at him.

Kingsnorths article is worth reading in full, and his Substack is consistently interesting and compelling.

We dont like to try and predict the future here atMind Matters, since it seems so difficult to do. Nonetheless, C. S. Lewiss novel and Kingsnorths warning rightly point out the dangers of depending too much on the machines we create. They might make us feel powerful, but in reality, they leave us weak.

Peter Kreeft, a philosopher at Boston College, wrote about this idea in his great bookThe Philosophy of Tolkien:The Worldview Behind The Lord of the Rings.As the title indicates, the book goes into depth on Tolkiens intricate worldview, conception of ethics, and the battle between good and evil. Kreeft writes,

We have done exactly what Sauron did in forging the Ring. We have put our power into things in order to increase our power. And the result is, as everyone knows but no one admits, that we are now weak little wimps, unable to survive a blow to the great spider of our technological network. We tremble before a nationwide electrical blackout or a global computer virus. Only hillbillies and Boy Scouts would survive a nuclear war. In our drive for power we have deceived ourselves into thinking that we have become more powerful when all the time we have been becoming less.

This is why it probably wouldnt be so great an idea toforce everyone to get electric stoves. Power goes out, and everyones basically doomed. I appreciate the technology of a lighter, but if Im ever trapped in the Colorado wilderness and need to keep warm, Id probably need a how-to manual for making fire from friction. Technology shows the remarkable ingenuity of human beings, but the more sophisticated it gets, the more tempting it will be to compromise the creativity that makes us unique and live as makeshift drones.

In short, we create technology, but we seem to be at a point where its compromising the very things that allowed us to develop it in the first place: innovation, creativity, hard work. If its ever stripped away, will we have the skills, stamina, and discipline to recover? If I upload my memories, consciousness, and relationships into the Machine, will I have laid myself at the altar of that hideous strength?

Here is the original post:

At the Altar of that Hideous Strength - Discovery Institute