Letter to the Editor: Packing the Supreme Court with liberals would undermine our Constitution – St George News
Visitors walk outside the Supreme Court building on Capitol Hill in Washington, D.C., Feb. 21, 2022. Members of high court (inset) pose for a group photo Oct. 7, 2022 | Associated Press file photos, St. George News
OPINION In response to the recent Letter to the Editor published on St. George News about the proposed Judiciary Act, support for court packing shows a severe lack of comprehension regarding our Constitution and the separation of power.
The writer laments that current Supreme Court rulings do not reflect the will of the people. Perhaps the public education system needs to be teaching U.S. Government instead of gender theory, considering such a statement shows dangerous ignorance regarding checks, balances and the purpose of judicial review.
It is the elected representatives who make up Congress, the legislative branch, who are to write constitutional legislation that hopefully represents the will of the people. The system of checks and balances leaves it up to the judicial branch to interpret whether or not such legislation is constitutional. Obviously, not every act of central power is protected in our Constitution, nor should it be, considering such a stance is a slip n slide into federal tyranny.
The ideological issue is this: Conservatives are what are traditionally known to be strict constructionists, while liberals tend to be loose constructionists. That is to say, strict constructionists interpret the language of the Constitution within its historical context, intent and explicit language; while loose constructionists interpret the founding document arbitrarily and can be framed as relatively good for the country, even if the Constitution does not explicitly allow it.
Here is a fundamental issue with loose constructionists good is entirely subjective to personal values and social ideology. For example, one day, a loose constructionist court can determine that overpopulation is a threat to the prosperity of our Union and thus determine that it is good for Congress to enact legislation that would limit reproduction to state-approved families. Within the explicit context of the Constitution, there is no circumstance where a strict constructionist court would allow such tyranny.
Another issue is that liberals tend to believe that the central government has to be the solution to all problems, while conservatives believe that problems tend to exist because of personal choices, thus can be solved by personal choices. Conservatives believe you should turn to yourself, your family and your local community/charity before you look to the government to bail you out.
Regarding the writers statements regarding recent Supreme Court decisions: First, they claimed that the Supreme Court gutted voting rights. Since he or she never actually states what cases they are fear-mongering on, readers can only speculate the decisions in reference. Allen v. Milligan was decided in June of this year, which affirmed a lower court ruling that Alabamas congressional maps for 2020 likely violated the Voting Rights Act, thus requiring Alabama to redraw congressional maps by the 1st of October. If anything, this decision errs more to liberal favor. Personally, I think it is a terrifying precedent set that states must district according to racial demographics rather than statistically reviewed voting patterns.
Secondly, the writer complains about the court opening the floodgates to unlimited corporate money within our elections. This is another complaint that I am very confused as to what the writer is referring to. There is a 2010 case, Citizens United vs. FEC, where the court ruled that prohibiting corporate and union independent expenditures violated the First Amendment. The dissent in this case essentially wrote that the potential for taking bribes was far greater than the First Amendment.
If your fear is corruption, then we need to constantly hold our elected representatives up to ethical standards as citizens rather than infringe on First Amendment rights as a preventative measure for potential corruption. Dont expect the government to hold itself accountable. If you think your representatives are voting solely in the interests of corporate donors and not their constituents, vote them out. This is also why we have laws against taking bribes and we have ethical standards in Congress. The onus is on you, the constituency, to pay attention.
Thirdly, the writer whines about the courts overturning what is broadly referred to as gun safety laws. My assumption is that she is referencing the Bruen decision, which ruled that requiring a state-approved reason for wanting to conceal carry was unconstitutional. The wording in the 2nd amendment is very clear the right of the people to bear arms shall not be infringed. The use of the term militia also implies bearing arms extends to the public domain.
The New York law that was struck down required citizens to have proper cause to conceal carry. Shall-issue permitting requires applicants for firearms to satisfy objective criteria, such as a background check; the court did not take issue with this. What the court deemed unconstitutional was the may-issue policy that meant your right to arm yourself against tyranny was dependent on local authorities agreeing with your reason for wanting to own a gun.
Fourthly, regarding the Dobbs decision and the overturning of Roe v. Wade sending abortion back to the states the writers personal turmoil is simply a result of their social ideology and holds no constitutional weight. Abortion was loosely interpreted as a personal liberty when Roe was initially decided. When you disingenuously simplify abortion to merely the choice between parenthood or not, it is very easy to then view it as a personal liberty. However, when you are honest about the conversation, you realize abortion is not simply choosing to have children, but it is medically intervening in the life of ones own child who already exists in the womb.
The Constitution does not define liberty, and it would be negligent for the justices to use their own arbitrary feelings of what should be included in the word to define it for the country. They instead interpreted what the founding fathers meant when they wrote the Constitution, and to do so, they examined abortion in its historical context. Prior to Roe v Wade in 1973, abortion was overwhelmingly criminalized; such a pattern of criminalization shows that abortion was not considered essential to American liberty. To add to this, the Jackson Womens Health Organization attempted to prove that America had a pattern of allowing abortion prior to quickening before Roe as a way to show the historical context in allowing abortion.
What is quickening? It is approximately 15 weeks gestation when the mother can feel her son or daughter moving inside the womb. Think about this: why would quickening be the cut-off point for ending a pregnancy during a time when we lacked prenatal technology? It was the point in fetal development where mothers would objectively know that their childs life in the womb had begun. Considering modern technology, Jackson Womens Health Organization may have inadvertently provided the historical context that when human life begins has always been important to criminalizing abortion, thus laying the groundwork for broader abortion bans.
To be clear, the court did not ban abortion, it ruled that abortion is not constitutionally protected and thus should be left to the states.
With all things said, the Supreme Court is doing exactly what the founding fathers intended it to do interpret the meaning and constitutionality of legislation and federal power. Citizens should be scared for their rights when the court is full of loose constructionists who lack objectivity and arbitrarily decide what they think is relatively good for the public.
Submitted by MELANIE COX, St. George.
Letters to the Editor are not the product of St. George News, its editors, staff or news contributors. The matters stated and opinions given are the responsibility of the person submitting them. They do not reflect the product or opinion of St. George News and are given only light edit for technical style and formatting.
Letters to the Editor are received from the public and are not the product of St.George News, its editors, staff or contributors. The matters stated and opinions given are strictly the responsibility of the person submitting them; they do not reflect the product or opinion of St. George News. Letters to the Editor, op-eds, and other news matters may be submitted for consideration to St. George News via email to: [emailprotected]
- Canada Liberals to vote on Trudeau's successor as trade war with US heats up - FRANCE 24 English - March 9th, 2025 [March 9th, 2025]
- The Liberals are on the verge of a remarkable comeback. Theres one thing the new leader must do to clinch a win - Toronto Star - March 9th, 2025 [March 9th, 2025]
- The Liberals Choose a Leader in the Shadow of Trumps Threats - The New York Times - March 9th, 2025 [March 9th, 2025]
- Liberals to turn the page on the Justin Trudeau era as party selects successor - CTV News - March 9th, 2025 [March 9th, 2025]
- Tesla, Inc. (TSLA): Jim Cramer Warns Liberals Arent Buying Their Cars! - Yahoo Finance - March 9th, 2025 [March 9th, 2025]
- Canada Liberals to reveal Trudeaus successor amid trade war with US - The News International - March 9th, 2025 [March 9th, 2025]
- Disgusting, Ugly Liberals Try To Smear Riley Gaines For The Dumbest Reason Possible - Outkick - March 9th, 2025 [March 9th, 2025]
- The Liberals are about to choose the next prime minister. What happens next? - CTV News - March 9th, 2025 [March 9th, 2025]
- Canada's ruling Liberals move on from Trudeau with Trump boost - Reuters - March 7th, 2025 [March 7th, 2025]
- Liberals torch trash Gavin Newsom for launching podcast with Charlie Kirk interview - The Independent - March 7th, 2025 [March 7th, 2025]
- Canadas Liberals were heading into a crushing defeat. Then came Trump. - The Washington Post - March 7th, 2025 [March 7th, 2025]
- Carson Jerema: Free trade is dead. Someone should tell the Liberals - National Post - March 7th, 2025 [March 7th, 2025]
- Austrian liberals' vote removes last obstacle to coalition government - Reuters - March 7th, 2025 [March 7th, 2025]
- Gould hoping progressive Liberals will propel her to party leadership - iPolitics.ca - March 7th, 2025 [March 7th, 2025]
- Liberals torch trash Gavin Newsom for launching podcast with Charlie Kirk interview - AOL - March 7th, 2025 [March 7th, 2025]
- Opposition PCs hammer NL Liberals on health cuts to hit savings goal - SaltWire N.L. powered by The Telegram - March 7th, 2025 [March 7th, 2025]
- Gavin Newsom splits from California liberals and condemns transgender athletes in women's sport in chat with C - Daily Mail - March 7th, 2025 [March 7th, 2025]
- Analysis-Canada's ruling Liberals move on from Trudeau with Trump boost - MSN - March 7th, 2025 [March 7th, 2025]
- An Emotional Torture Chamber for Liberals: 3 Writers on Trumps First Month - The New York Times - March 1st, 2025 [March 1st, 2025]
- What conservative women know and liberals don't about happiness | Opinion - USA TODAY - March 1st, 2025 [March 1st, 2025]
- What conservative women know and liberals don't about happiness | Opinion - Institute for Family Studies - March 1st, 2025 [March 1st, 2025]
- Liberals', conservatives' trust in US government's use of digital health data diverged during COVID - University of Minnesota Twin Cities - March 1st, 2025 [March 1st, 2025]
- The changing face of gun ownership... Liberals reveal the bold reasons they're taking up arms - Daily Mail - March 1st, 2025 [March 1st, 2025]
- Omar El Akkad on Genocide, Complicit Liberals, and the Terrible Wrath of the West - Literary Hub - March 1st, 2025 [March 1st, 2025]
- WA Liberals' Albany candidate Thomas Brough back in spotlight over abortion comments - ABC News - March 1st, 2025 [March 1st, 2025]
- John Ivison: Why Conservatives say they arent sweating the Liberals Lazarus-like revival - National Post - March 1st, 2025 [March 1st, 2025]
- Liberals top Tories for 1st time in years, new Ipsos polling says - Global News Toronto - March 1st, 2025 [March 1st, 2025]
- Why White Christian Nationalists are Freaked out: Liberals are More likely to be Non-Religious than Christian - Informed Comment - March 1st, 2025 [March 1st, 2025]
- The Week in Polling: Liberals gaining fast on the Conservatives; Canadians think Trump is serious about the 51st state; Carney not far ahead of... - March 1st, 2025 [March 1st, 2025]
- Letters to the editor, Feb. 27: One of my greatest regrets is voting for the Liberals in the last election - The Globe and Mail - March 1st, 2025 [March 1st, 2025]
- How the shattered German Liberals will be shaped from Brussels - EURACTIV - March 1st, 2025 [March 1st, 2025]
- Preston Manning: The Liberals' disingenuous deathbed conversion in the face of Trump tariffs - National Post - March 1st, 2025 [March 1st, 2025]
- Opinion: Before electing Mark Carney as leader, the Liberals should pause for a moment of reflection - The Globe and Mail - March 1st, 2025 [March 1st, 2025]
- New poll puts Liberals ahead of the Conservatives for the first time since 2021 - CityNews Vancouver - March 1st, 2025 [March 1st, 2025]
- There could have been a better result Liberals regain official party status but remain in third place - iPolitics.ca - March 1st, 2025 [March 1st, 2025]
- FIRST READING: The most telling indicator that the Liberals remain doomed - National Post - March 1st, 2025 [March 1st, 2025]
- CPACs MAGAfest returns to rub it in the faces of DCs liberals - The Independent - February 23rd, 2025 [February 23rd, 2025]
- Austrian liberals join talks on forming a centrist coalition government - Reuters - February 23rd, 2025 [February 23rd, 2025]
- Conservatives and liberals will give free theater performance at local church - Decaturish.com - February 23rd, 2025 [February 23rd, 2025]
- Liberals loved this earnest Kate McKinnon moment on SNL but Lorne Michaels wasnt a big fan - New York Post - February 23rd, 2025 [February 23rd, 2025]
- Liberals need to take a chill pill for Trump headaches and other opinions you read most - Yahoo - February 23rd, 2025 [February 23rd, 2025]
- WA Liberals endure bruising week as election race gets tough - ABC News - February 23rd, 2025 [February 23rd, 2025]
- Some Liberals say mistakes costing party, while others defend campaign team punching above its weight - iPolitics.ca - February 23rd, 2025 [February 23rd, 2025]
- Liberals have me worried. Their fury and stress is hurting someone. It isn't Trump. | Opinion - The Columbus Dispatch - February 20th, 2025 [February 20th, 2025]
- The boom of in vitro fertilization in Poland after the return of the Liberals to power - Le Monde - February 20th, 2025 [February 20th, 2025]
- Jon Stewart reveals the anti-Trump insult he's sick of liberals using and warns it has lost its power - Daily Mail - February 20th, 2025 [February 20th, 2025]
- The Guilting of the Liberals - lareviewofbooks - February 20th, 2025 [February 20th, 2025]
- Teslas Used to Be Cool. For Liberals, Now They're Anything But - Newsweek - February 20th, 2025 [February 20th, 2025]
- Michel Maisonneuve: Only an election can save Canada from the old, tired Liberals - National Post - February 20th, 2025 [February 20th, 2025]
- Inside Winnipeg Politics: Could the Liberals really win again? - Winnipeg Sun - February 20th, 2025 [February 20th, 2025]
- Letter: Canada cannot afford to re-elect the Liberals - Cowichan Valley Citizen - February 20th, 2025 [February 20th, 2025]
- Opposition MPs criticize Liberals for failing to rein in record federal spending on outsourcing - The Globe and Mail - February 20th, 2025 [February 20th, 2025]
- Federal vote intention tightens to near-tie as Liberals and New Democrats rally around Carney - Angus Reid Institute - February 20th, 2025 [February 20th, 2025]
- Meet the new Liberals. Same as the old Liberals - The Globe and Mail - February 14th, 2025 [February 14th, 2025]
- Bell: What's up Canada? Liberals could win the election, are you nuts? - Calgary Herald - February 14th, 2025 [February 14th, 2025]
- Liberals are up 7 in a month, but the Conservatives still hold a 19-point lead - inFocus with David Coletto - February 14th, 2025 [February 14th, 2025]
- Liberals will soon pick the next prime minister. Here's what candidates are promising - CBC.ca - February 14th, 2025 [February 14th, 2025]
- You may not like Trump. But his attempts to seize the Fed contain a lesson for liberals | Leah Downey - The Guardian - February 14th, 2025 [February 14th, 2025]
- Liberals will soon pick the next prime minister. Here's what candidates are promising - MSN - February 14th, 2025 [February 14th, 2025]
- Doctor compares liberals reaction to President Trump to Americas shock after 9/11 attacks: It is affecting their lives - New York Post - February 14th, 2025 [February 14th, 2025]
- Liberals would be tied with Conservatives with Carney as leader: poll - National Post - February 14th, 2025 [February 14th, 2025]
- For Israeli liberals, Trumps a double-edged sword - The Times of Israel - February 14th, 2025 [February 14th, 2025]
- Canadians are focused on the here and now: Darrell Bricker on what accounts for the Liberals polling resurgence - The Hub - February 14th, 2025 [February 14th, 2025]
- GOLDSTEIN: Federal Liberals can't be trusted with the economy - Toronto Sun - February 14th, 2025 [February 14th, 2025]
- NDP, Liberals ask integrity commissioner to probe Ford's anti-tariff trip to Washington, D.C. - Yahoo News Canada - February 14th, 2025 [February 14th, 2025]
- Conservatives still frontrunners but hemorrhaging support to Liberals: Nanos survey - CTV News - February 14th, 2025 [February 14th, 2025]
- Terry Newman: Ontario Liberals stalked by the ghost of Kathleen Wynne - National Post - February 14th, 2025 [February 14th, 2025]
- Radical rights mission is to wind up liberals - The Times - February 5th, 2025 [February 5th, 2025]
- PODCAST: Have the Liberals given up on Sault Ste. Marie? - SooToday - February 5th, 2025 [February 5th, 2025]
- Michael Higgins: Finally, the Liberals start tackling the scourge of fentanyl - National Post - February 5th, 2025 [February 5th, 2025]
- Where are they? Liberals, Greens remain Ontario election no-shows in Windsor-Essex - Windsor Star - February 5th, 2025 [February 5th, 2025]
- Nunavut MP calls on Liberals to extend Inuit child funding program - EverythingGP - February 5th, 2025 [February 5th, 2025]
- Nunavut MP calls on Liberals to extend Inuit child funding program - pentictonherald.ca - February 5th, 2025 [February 5th, 2025]
- Morning Update: PC Party, Liberals promise to take over LRT if they win election - CTV News - February 5th, 2025 [February 5th, 2025]
- In Israel, Even the Liberals Love Trump. This Is Why - Haaretz - February 3rd, 2025 [February 3rd, 2025]
- FIRST READING: The Liberals' extremely low-barrier plan to pick the next prime minister - National Post - February 3rd, 2025 [February 3rd, 2025]
- Young families grappling with the cost of living are the focus of policies announced by WA Labor and Liberals in upcoming state election - MSN - February 3rd, 2025 [February 3rd, 2025]
- Trump should send a bouquet of flowers to the Liberals: Poilievre - CTV News - February 3rd, 2025 [February 3rd, 2025]
- Allan R. Gregg: 1993 redux? Not necessarily. How the failing Liberals may just win again - The Hub - February 3rd, 2025 [February 3rd, 2025]
- Letters: Liberals can't be trusted to navigate Trump's tariffs - National Post - February 3rd, 2025 [February 3rd, 2025]